Language : ENGLISH Original : FRENCH RURAL DRINKING WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROJECT COUNTRY : CAMEROON PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Date : May 2010 Appraisal Team Team Leader : I. A. TRAORE, Principal Water and Sanitation Engineer OWAS.1 A. BELLA, Water and Sanitation Engineer/Environmentalist OWAS.1 Team Members : P. HORUGAVYE, Senior Socio-economist OWAS 1 S. BARA, Senior Gender Specialist OWAS1 C. AHOSSI, Regional Procurements Coordinator ORPF.1 B. CISSE, Financial Analyst OWAS 1 M. YARO, Principal Financial Management Expert ORPF.2 S. MBA, Infrastructure Specialist CMFO J. FRANSEN, Environmentalist (Consultant) OWAS1. Sector Division Manager : A. BAMBA OWAS.1 Resident Representative : A. GAHUNGU CMFO Sector Director : S. JALLOW, Officer in charge OWAS Regional Director : J.M. GHARBI, Director ORCE ; Peer Review El ARKOUBI, Senior Water and Sanitation Engineer OWAS 1 B. KEBA, Chief Financial Analyst OWAS.1 M. Moumni; Water and Sanitation Engineer OWAS 1 A. EYEGHE, Socio-economist OSHD.1 J. NGUEMA, Electrical Engineer OINF.3 AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND
33
Embed
PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Date : May 2010 · 2019-06-29 · PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Date : May 2010 Appraisal Team Team Leader : I. A. TRAORE, Principal Water and Sanitation Engineer
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Language : ENGLISH
Original : FRENCH
RURAL DRINKING WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROJECT
COUNTRY : CAMEROON
PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Date : May 2010
Appraisal Team
Team Leader : I. A. TRAORE, Principal Water and Sanitation Engineer OWAS.1
A. BELLA, Water and Sanitation Engineer/Environmentalist OWAS.1
Team Members : P. HORUGAVYE, Senior Socio-economist OWAS 1
S. BARA, Senior Gender Specialist OWAS1
C. AHOSSI, Regional Procurements Coordinator ORPF.1
B. CISSE, Financial Analyst OWAS 1
M. YARO, Principal Financial Management Expert ORPF.2
S. MBA, Infrastructure Specialist CMFO
J. FRANSEN, Environmentalist (Consultant) OWAS1.
Sector Division Manager : A. BAMBA OWAS.1 Resident Representative : A. GAHUNGU CMFO Sector Director : S. JALLOW, Officer in charge OWAS Regional Director : J.M. GHARBI, Director ORCE
;
Peer Review
El ARKOUBI, Senior Water and Sanitation Engineer OWAS 1
B. KEBA, Chief Financial Analyst OWAS.1
M. Moumni; Water and Sanitation Engineer OWAS 1
A. EYEGHE, Socio-economist OSHD.1
J. NGUEMA, Electrical Engineer OINF.3
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND
TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Information Sheet ............................................................................................................................................. ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... iii
Results-based logical framework ................................................................................................................................... v
Project Implementation Schedule .............................................................................................................................. viii
I. STRATEGIQUE ORIENTATION AND RATIONALE ................................................................................ 1
1.1. Project Links with Country Strategy and Objectives ................................................................................ 1
1.2. Rationale for Bank Intervention ............................................................................................................... 1
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Technical Solutions Adopted and Alternative Solutions Considered....................................................... 5
2.3 Project Type ............................................................................................................................................... 6
2.4 Project Cost and Financing Arrangements .............................................................................................. 6
2.5 Project Area and Beneficiaries .................................................................................................................. 8
2.6 Participatory Approach to Project Identification, Design and Implementation ...................................... 8
2.7 Bank Group Experience and Lessons Learnt from Project Design ......................................................... 9
4.6 Knowledge Development ......................................................................................................................... 18
V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................................. 18
5.2 Conditions Governing the Bank’s Intervention ...................................................................................... 18
5.3 Conformity with Bank Policies................................................................................................................ 19
VI. RECOMMENDATION. ............................................................................................................................. 19
Appendix I. Comparative socio-economic indicators ............................................................................................... 1
Appendix II. Table of ongoing Bank Group operations in the country .................................................................. 1
Appendix III: Major related projects financed by the Bank and other partners ............................................. 1
Appendix IV. Map of the project area ....................................................................................................................
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(November 2009)
UA 1 = CFAF 704
UA 1 = EUR 1.07
UA 1 = USD 1.61
FISCAL YEAR
1st January – 31st December
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
m = meter
ml = linear meter
m3
= cubic meter
km = kilometer
l/inh/d = liter per inhabitant per day
1 kg = 1 kilogram
LIST OF ABREVIATIONS AFCO Administrative, Financial and Accounting Officer
AFD Agence française de Développement
AFS Administrative and Financial Services
CAA Autonomous Sinking Fund
CAMWATER Cameroon Water Utilities Corporation
CDE Camerounaise des Eaux (Cameroon Water Company)
CIDA Canadian International Development Agency
CSP Country Strategy Paper
DGA Directorate of General Affairs (MINEE)
DHH Directorate of Hydraulics and Hydrology
DRI Directorate of Regional Integration
DWS Drinking water supply
DWSS Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
FEICOM Special Council Support Fund for Mutual Assistance
GESP Growth and Employment Strategy Paper
GTC Gender-sensitive toilet complex
IEC Information, Education and Communication
INS National Institute of Statistics
IsDB Islamic Development Bank
IWRM Integrated water resources management
MINATD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Decentralization
MINDUH Ministry of Urban Development and Housing
MINEDUB Ministry of Basic Education
MINEE Ministry of Energy and Water Resources
MINEPAT Ministry of the Economy, Planning and Territorial Development
MINFI Ministry of Finance
MINPROFF Ministry of Women’s Empowerment and Family Affairs
MINSANTE Ministry of Public Health
PAE Public Administrative Establishment
PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability
PEMFAR Public Expenditure Management and Fiduciary Accountability Review
PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
RDEW Regional Delegation for Energy and Water Resources
RFC Regional Follow-up Committee
RWSSI Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Initiative
SNEC Société Nationale des Eaux du Cameroun (Cameroon National Water Corporation)
STECOM Steering committee
UA Unit of Account
VDC Village Development Committee
VIP Ventilated improved pit (latrine)
ii
Project Information Sheet
BORROWER : Republic of Cameroon EXECUTING AGENCY : Ministry of Energy and Water Resources
Financing plan
Source Amount (UA) Instrument
ADF 10,000,000
Loan
RWSSI Trust Fund 5,000,000 Grant
Government 1,500,000
Beneficiaries (“Councils” –refers to
the local administrative organs as
well as the districts they represent)
0,750,000
TOTAL COST 17,250,000
Important ADB financial information
Loan currency
UA
Type of interest NA
Interest rate margin NA
Commitment fee 0.5% of the disbursed amount
taking effect 120 days after
signature of the loan agreement
Service commission 0.75% per year of the amount
disbursed and outstanding.
Maturity Every 6 months from the 11th
to the
50th
year
Grace period 10 years
ERR (base-case scenario)
NPV
33.92 %
CFA.F 19.33 billion
Duration – Main stages (expected)
Approval of Design Note November 2009
Project approval May 2010
Effectiveness August 2010
Last disbursement June 2015
Completion February 2015
Last reimbursement December 2060
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. The goal of the Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Project is to support Government
efforts to increase access to drinking water and sanitation and strengthen the sector’s managerial
capacity. It falls under implementation of the Government's 2008-2015 action plan whose
ultimate goal is to raise rural drinking water and sanitation access rates to to 80% and 60%
respectively.
2. The project covers four regions in Cameroon, namely the West, North West, South-
West and South Regions. The main expected outputs of this project are: (i) rehabilitation and
construction of 88 drinking water supply networks; (ii) construction of 285 six-compartment
ventilated pit latrines in schools and health centers, 1332 single-compartment ventilated pit
latrines on private plots and 2 gender-sensitive toilet complexes in the South and North-West
Regions respectively; (iii) rehabilitation of MINEE and its regional delegations (DREEs) in the
South-West and North- West Regions, and construction of MINEE regional delegation (DREEs)
offices in the South and West Regions; (iv) training and awareness-raising for beneficiary
communities on drinking water use, sanitation and hygiene; (v) capacity-building for sector
management structures.
3. The project will raise the drinking water access rate from 33% currently to 60% in 2015
and the sanitation access rate from 17% on average to 22% in 2015 within the project area. It is
also expected to generate a change of attitude and behavior with respect to hygiene and health,
within the beneficiary community, and the average prevalence rate for diseases associated with
the lack of safe water and sanitation will decline by 30% - from 19% to 13.5%- during this
period. Hence, the project will meet the drinking water needs of 668,000 inhabitants and, through
IEC, prompt a change of behavior with regard to hygiene and health. About 750,000 inhabitants
(52% women) are expected to adopt improved latrines. The institutional structures involved in
project implementation, namely MINEE (DHH), the Councils, national enterprises and
consultancy firms, community interest groups and women’s associations will also benefit from
the project. The project will create about 300 non-permanent jobs during implementation and
154 permanent jobs at completion, in the maintenance, repair and management of water and
sanitation infrastructure.
4. The estimated project cost is UA 17.25 million, of which UA 11.56 million is in foreign
exchange and UA 5.69 million in local currency. The project will be financed with an ADF loan
of UA 10 million, a grant of UA 5 million from the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Initiative
(RWSSI) Trust Fund as well as counterpart funds of UA 1.5 million from the Government and
UA 0.75 million from beneficiaries.
5. To better assess needs over the entire national territory, the Government prepared an
inventory of rural water supply infrastructure and used the results to design a national DWSS
plan for rural areas. Pending the commencement of this operation, the Government financed
water supply infrastructure inventories in the four project regions and used the inventory results
and the ensuing technical studies as a basis for designing the project. The lessons learned from
this project will enhance preparation of the national program and ensure better quality at entry.
iv
6. The Government sought Bank financing for the project because the Bank has the
advantage of knowing the sector better, considering its previous investments in two DWSS
operations in Yaoundé and in 16 semi-urban centers. The Bank has solid experience in
implementing rural drinking water supply and sanitation projects, especially through RWSSI
programs. Furthermore, it has sound knowledge of project basis, its environment and the
concerns of beneficiaries. The Bank's intervention will also encourage other donors, who have
hitherto focused more on urban areas, to pay attention to rural areas.
7. Knowledge management will be implemented through the "monitoring/evaluation"
component to be executed by a project monitoring/evaluation expert. Studies on rural sanitation
strategy, water resource reference data to enhance IWRM, the IEC reference study, the DHH
water database to be updated, as well as DWSS feasibility studies, will all generate a
considerable knowledge base that will lead to preparation of future strategies and operations.
v
Results-based logical framework
HIERARCHY OF
OBJECTIVES
EXPECTED
OUTPUTS SCOPE
(beneficiaries) PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
BASELINE SITUATION
INDICATIVE TARGETS AND TIMELINE
RISKS/
ASSUMPTIONS
1. GOVT’s NATIONAL
PROGRAM GOAL
Help to improve the living
conditions of Cameroonian
rural communities through
sustainable access to drinking
water and sanitation.
LONGER-TERM
OUTPUTS (Impact)
By 2020 Living conditions of
communities improved
through greater access to
drinking water and
sanitation.
Beneficiaries
Cameroonian
rural
population
(8.2 million)
Impact indicators
1) Increased drinking water
supply
(2) Greater access to sanitation
services
3) Reduced prevalence of
water-borne diseases
4) Reduced incidence of malaria
Sources: MINEE, INS, reports
of health structures
Long-term progress
Expected by 2020 1) Increased access rate to drinking water in rural
areas from the current 45% to 80% from 2015
(2) The sanitation access rate rises from 13.5% to
60% from 2015.
3) Reduced prevalence of water-borne diseases
from 19% to 13.5% from 2015; 4) Reduced
incidence of malaria from the current 15% to 3%
from 2015.
Assumptions
- Implementation
of GESP and
application of the
Rural Water
Supply and
Sanitation policy
- Consolidation of
governance and
decentralization
within the sector
2. ULTIMATE PROJECT
OBJECTIVE
Increase access to drinking
water and sanitation in 4
regions of Cameroon
(North-West, South-West,
West and South)
MEDIUM-TERM
OUTPUTS
By 2015 (impact)
Improved access to
drinking water and
sanitation for rural
communities in four
regions of Cameroon;
Beneficiaries
Communities
in four
regions:
North-West,
South, South-
West, West
Regions of
Cameroon;
increased
access to
drinking water
for 668,000
inhabitants
and to
sanitation for
750,000
inhabitants
(52% women).
Results indicators
1. Drinking water access rate;
2. Average water consumption
per capita and per day;
3. Sanitation access rate;
4). Number of jobs created:
5). Number of persons
sensitized;
6) Reduced distance for fetching
water;
7) Improved latrines
constructed.
Source: MINEE, progress
reports, monitoring/evaluation
reports, councils, associations
Expected medium-term progress
By 2015
1. By 2015, access to drinking water for rural
communities in the four regions rises from 33%
(current) to 60%;
2. Average water consumption rises from
10l/day/inhab. (current) to 25l/day/inhab.
3. Access to sanitation services in the rural areas
of the four regions rises from the (current)
average of 17% to 22%;
4.1 At least 100 jobs created for plumbers and
small-scale repairers;
4.2 At least 54 permanent jobs created by GTCs
for women and youth;
5. At least 176 management committee members
take over IEC activities in the communities of the
project area (60% of them women)
6. Access to water within less than 500 m
7. 30% of the communities sensitized use
improved latrines.
Risk
Inefficient repair and
maintenance of water
supply networks and
latrines;
Mitigative measures
- Regular
implementation and
monitoring of IEC on
maintenance
- Involvement of
mayors, municipal
councils and water
management
committees;
- Provision for
maintenance budgets
by councils.
vi
3. INPUTS / ACTIVITIES
3.1 Works
Rehabilitation and
construction of DWS
infrastructure in the rural
areas of the four regions;
Construction of family and
public sanitation
infrastructure in the project
area;
Construction of gender-
sensitive toilet complexes
(GTCs)
3.2 IEC Conduct of Information,
Education, Communication
(IEC) sessions on hygiene,
sanitation, malaria and
HIV/AIDS,
3.3 Capacity-building
- Drafting of the rural
sanitation strategy
- Conduct of DWSS
feasibility studies
- Rehabilitation / construction
of DHH offices
- Recruitment of Technical
Assistance
Assistance contract with
Dutch Cooperation
RESULTS / OUTPUT
By 2012 (mid-term)
Simplified DWS
networks constructed;
Six-compartment
ventilated public pit
latrines constructed as
well as single
compartment latrines on
private plots
Gender-sensitive Toilet
complexes constructed;
Campaigns organized for
awareness-raising,
hygiene education as
well as malaria and
HIV/AIDS control;
IEC campaigns
organized on the
importance of
constructing improved
family latrines
Rural sanitation strategy
study conducted;
DWSS feasibility studies
finalized for the
mobilization of potential
donors;
DHH water database
updated
Offices rehabilitated/
constructed;
Technical Assistance
recruited for project
oversight, information
Beneficiaries
Communities
in the four
regions
(North-West,
West, South,
South-West),
representing
750,000
inhabitants
(52% women)
DHH,/MINE
PAT
Donors
DHH
Experts from
the DHH and
other
Results indicators
1. Number of simplified DWS
networks
constructed
2. Number of six-compartment
ventilated pit latrine complexes
constructed
3. Number of family latrines
constructed
4. Number of GTCs constructed
per region
Number of committees trained
and sensitized on hygiene and
sanitation, malaria and
HIV/AIDS
Source: MINEE, DHH,
Regional Follow-up
Committees and councils
Methods: Population surveys for
IEC, supervision report, mid-
term evaluation reports and
progress report.
Study report and strategy paper
Number of studies conducted
Number of offices rehabilitated/
constructed
Number of technical assistance
experts recruited
Expected short-term progress:
By 2012 (mid-term)
1) Forty-four (44) DWS networks simplified,
representing 50%;
2) 200 six-compartment ventilated pit public
latrines in health centers and schools, representing
70%;
3) 266 improved family latrines constructed;
representing 20%.
4) Two (2) gender-sensitive toilet complexes
constructed in the South and North West Regions
- Four (4) Regional Follow-up Committees set
up;
- 880 members of the DWS management
committee trained (30% women);
IEC study and strategy conducted
A rural sanitation strategy available from the end
of 2012;
At least 1 study conducted before the end of 2012
2 offices rehabilitated/constructed, representing
50% at the end of 2012
DHH water database updated
Six experts recruited (for project oversight,
information technology, archiving,
monitoring/evaluation, procurements and
accounting)
-1 IEC expert.
20 government experts (30% women) qualified
in various areas (geology, rural engineering,
hydrology, archiving, information technology)
will be recruited at the end of 2010 and their
Risk
Little transparency in
the procurements
process
Mitigative Measures
- Setting-up of the
special procurements
commission,
publication of bidding
results. Empowerment
of MINEE
Risk
Delay of national
counterpart funds
Mitigative Measure
Allocation of national
contribution to
activities that are
unrelated to DWSS
infrastructure
Risk
Limited capacity of
the DHH fore
coordination,
fiduciary
management and
implementation of the
project.
Mitigative measures
Human resource
capacity-building for
the DHH through the
recruitment and
training of experts,
technical assistance;
construction of
offices, procurement
of equipment.
Efficient
monitoring/evaluatio
n mechanism set up.
vii
- Training (20 experts)
3.4 Project management
Project coordination support
Baseline surveys and surveys
conducted at project
completion by INS
Financial, accounting and
technical audits
FINANCIAL RESOURCES ADF loan : UA 10,000,000
RWSSI grant : UA 5,000,000
Government : UA 1,500,000
Beneficiaries : UA 750,000 TOTAL : UA 17,250,000
technology, archiving,
accounting and
monitoring/evaluation;
Assistance agreement
with Dutch Cooperation;
Training of DHH experts
recruited by the
government and placed
at the disposal of the
project as well as experts
from other services.
implementation unit
functioning;
Project implementation
manual prepared;
Administrative, financial
and accounting
procedures manual
prepared;
Effective intervention by
the internal auditors of
FEICOM;
Effective financial and
accounting monitoring
under adequate internal
audit;
Disbursement of funds
and effective payment of
jobbers within FEICOM
regional structure;
IT equipment and
vehicles procured;
Additional surveys for
baseline data and project
completion;
Audits conducted
departments
involved in
the project
DHH
Number of training sessions
organized
Number of experts recruited by
the government, trained for the
DHH and the other agencies;
Project implementation manual
prepared and made available;
Project procedures and
implementation manual prepared
and made available;
Audit reports prepared by the
internal audit organs;
Interim and end-of-year
financial reports prepared
regularly and on a timely basis.
Status of implementation of
internal audit recommendations
prepared;
Appraisal of the investment
funds management system set up
in FEICOM regional agencies;
Number of vehicles, computers,
photocopiers and accessories
supplied;
Survey reports produced;
Annual financial audits and
periodic technical audits
conducted;
Source: Survey, supervision,
mid-term evaluation and project
completion reports
Methods: Field surveys;
appraisal, supervision and mid-
term review missions
Auditors’ opinion on the
accuracy of financial statements;
Auditors’ assessment of the
internal audit system in place;
capacity strengthened during the life of the
project up to the end of 2012.
Project implementation manual prepared
(September 2010);
Administrative, financial and accounting
procedures manual prepared (September 2010);
At least 1 report produced per year by each
internal audit organ;
1 end-of-year financial report
4 quarterly interim financial reports
4 quarterly status reports on the implementation
of recommendations
Effective settlement of jobbers’ fees by FEICOM
regional agencies
7 vehicles, 10 computers and accessories and 6
photocopiers (end of 2010), 6 scanners
2 reports prepared in 2010 and 2014
4 financial audits (1 audit per year) and 1
technical audit (end 2014)
Risk
- Limited ownership
Mitigative measure
- organization and
training of local water
management
committees and their
involvement in
monitoring
viii
Project Implementation Schedule
Report And Recommendation of Bank Group Management to The Boards of Directors
Concerning a Proposal for the Award of an ADF Loan and A RWSSI Grant
to Cameroon to Finance a Rural Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Project.
Management hereby submits this report and recommendation concerning a proposal for
the award of a UA 10 million ADF loan and a UA 5 million RWSSI Trust Fund grant to the
Government of Cameroon to finance a Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation (DWSS) project in
rural areas.
I. TRATEGIQUE ORIENTATION AND RATIONALE
1.1. Project Links with Country Strategy and Objectives
1.1.1. The 2003-2008 PRSP included the water and sanitation sector among its priorities. A
review of PRSP implementation shows rather limited results, since the poverty levels have not
improved (40.2% in 2001 and 39.9% in 2008). Accordingly, Cameroon has designed a second-
generation strategy (set out in its 2010-2019 Growth and Employment Strategy Paper -GESP),
intended to boost growth by focusing on infrastructure development, governance consolidation,
formal sector job creation and poverty reduction, and thereby scale down the incidence of
poverty from 39.9% currently to 25% in 2019 and achieve all the MDGs. With respect to the
rural water supply and sanitation sector, the Government’s 2008-2015 action plan targets access
rates of 80% and 60% for drinking water and sanitation respectively in 2015.
1.1.2. The Government’s goal as stated in the GESP is to raise the access rate for drinking
water from 45% to 80% in 2015 and for sanitation from 13.5% to 60%. To that end, and pursuant
to the 2008-2015 action plan, the Government hopes to create 22,000 water points, rehabilitate
6000 water point and provide 150,000 households with modern latrines each year up to 2015.
The Government also envisages support actions in the form of IEC and capacity-building for
stakeholders and the regulatory mechanism. The overall cost estimate for these activities is UA
370 million for the 8 years. The Government expects to raise the necessary resources both
externally and internally. This project will thus support the implementation of the government's
DWSS policy and action plan set out in the GESP through: (i) rehabilitation of DWSS
infrastructure capacity-building for stakeholders; (ii) project ownership by the beneficiaries; and
(iii) sustainable DWSS services through better organization of the communities concerned.
1.2. Rationale for Bank Intervention
1.2.1. In Cameroon, the average rural drinking water access rate is 45%, compared to 77% in
urban areas. The population with access to adequate sanitation services is estimated at 13.5% in
rural areas compared to 17% in urban areas. Hence, Cameroon is still far from meeting the MDG
targets in this area envisaged in its strategy paper. To address this problem, the Government
adopted a rural DWSS policy and a 2008-2015 action plan in 2007 with a view to attaining
access rates of 80% for DWS and 60% for sanitation in rural areas. Furthermore, the water and
sanitation sector is fraught with constraints: (i) multiplicity of stakeholders and overlap of roles
and responsibilities, coupled with insufficient stakeholder coordination ; (ii) multiplicity of water
pump brands and unavailability of spare parts which poses serious difficulties in terms of
2
maintenance, repair and service continuity; (iii) inadequate financial resources for investment;
(v) shortcomings in project supervision/control entrusted by law to the decentralized territorial
entities (councils); and lastly (vi) the limited capacity of the agencies/departments currently
responsible for sector management.
1.2.2. In strict conformity with the GESP, the Bank's proposed strategy in Cameroon for the
2010-2014 period has two pillars: (i) promoting good governance; and (ii) contributing to
infrastructure improvement. Under the second pillar, the Bank proposes to contribute to
consolidation of the DWSS sector and the goal of this project is to support the implementation of
this second pillar and improve the living conditions of rural communities through drinking water
supply and sanitation.
1.2.3. For more effective assessment of needs, the Government prepared an inventory of rural
water supply infrastructure which it used in designing a national DWSS plan for rural areas. To
stave off other program implementation constraints, the Government has decided to execute this
project which should yield lessons to enhance the preparation and implementation of the national
program.
1.2.4. The Government has sought Bank financing for the project because the Bank has the
advantage of knowing the sector better, given its previous investments in two operations,
namely: the Yaounde Sanitation Project and the DWSS project in semi-urban areas. The Bank
also has the advantage of having implemented the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Initiative
(RWSSI) over the last few years. The stakeholder capacity-building and assistance in project
supervision, community organization in management, infrastructure repair and maintenance,
promotion of improved family latrines and GTCs as well as beneficiary participation as proposed
by the project will all pave the way for the management of the forthcoming National Program
and ensure the sustainability of its results.
1.3. Donor Coordination
1.3.1. Cameroon is a signatory of the Paris Declaration concerning the harmonization of aid
(2005). Aid coordination has traditionally involved organization of consultative groups. At the
national level, the Directorate General for Cooperation and Regional Integration, placed under
the Ministry of Economy and Planning, is the focal point of TFPs, including the Bank. A multi-
donor PRSP follow-up committee 1 (CMB) was set up in June 2001. It is a forum in which
donors can dialogue, exchange views, coordinate their activities and adopt a common position on
key development issues in Cameroon. The CMB is part of the alignment and harmonization
process promoted by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The CMB has gradually set up themed and
sectoral sub-groups (TSSGs). These sub-groups participate in the monitoring of PRSP
implementation, in accordance with the Paris Declaration concerning aid harmonization. They
are currently thirteen in number and cover all areas related to the economic, social and human
development of Cameroon. The Bank has been the lead agency for the Public Finance Sector
Committee since September 2008. Within the framework of a Multi-partner Committee, CMB
1 Germany, African Development Bank, World Bank, Canada, Spain, United States, France, IMF, Great Britain, Japan,
Netherlands, UNDP, European Union.
3
members also meet with Government officials and other stakeholders (private sector, civil
society, parliament, etc.) to exchange views on the implementation of the country's development
program.
1.3.2. The main rural DWSS sector donors are: Japanese Cooperation, the European Union (EU),
the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB), the French Development Agency (AFD), KFW, Belgian
Technical Cooperation, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the World Bank,
and UN agencies like UNICEF and the UNDP. These donors have often funded small-scale and
widely dispersed operations. Most of these operations ended in 2007. Only Japanese Cooperation,
the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB), UNICEF, the World Bank and ADB (with the water
infrastructure inventory study) are still active in the field. With this project, the Bank will become
one of the key donors of the sector. The table below presents a breakdown of the total
contributions of these donors from 2002 to 2009:
Sub-sector *
Percentage
GDP (average
2002-2007) Workforce
Rural drinking water
supply and sanitation 0.13% - -
Stakeholders – Average public expenditure from 2002 to 2009 (Rural DWSS)**
Government Donors
Japanese Cooperation : 36.19%
Belgian Cooperation : 11.52%
World Bank : 13.16%
IsDB : 23.03%
AFD : 0.66%
EU : 7.57%
ADB : 1.29%
CIDA : 6.58%
[UA 52.27 million] [43.17 UA million]
[56.9%] [43.12%]
Aid coordination level
Existence of thematic working groups [Yes]
Existence of a global sector program [Yes]
ADB’s role in aid coordination****
[M]
* the most appropriate; ** Years [Y1 to Y2]; *** for this sector or sub-sector
**** L : Lead donor; M: member (not leader): None: no role
4
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Project components
Name of
component
Component
cost
Description of components
A Drinking Water
Supply and
Sanitation
(DWSS)
Infrastructure
UA 11.94
million Drinking water supply
The project will entail the construction of 88 simplified DWS networks. Simplified drinking water
supply networks will be constructed, some gravity-based and others equipped with a pump. The
target is 22 simplified DWS networks in the West Region, 16 simplified DWS networks in the South
Region, 28 simplified DWS networks in the North-West Region and 22 simplified DWS networks in
the South-West Region.
Sanitation The project will involve the construction of 285 six-compartment ventilated pit latrines in schools
and health centers as follows: (i) 40 in schools and 31 in health centers of the West region; (ii) 40 in
schools and 31 in health centers of the South Region; (iii) 41 in schools and 31 in health centers of
the North West Region; and (iv) 40 in schools and 31 in health centers of the South-West Region.
Furthermore, a total of 1332 single compartment latrines (representing about 333 latrines per region)
will be constructed on private plots in each of the four regions as well as gender-sensitive toilet
complexes (GTCs) in the South and North West regions on an experimental basis.
B
.
Information,
education and
communication
UA 0.52
million
IEC activities shall entail: firstly, a diagnosis of attitudes and behavior with respect to hygiene
followed by the drafting of an adapted strategy on communication for behavior change (CBC);
secondly, the training of stakeholders (decentralized branches, management committees and VDCs);
and lastly, the conduct of field activities on the promotion of basic hygiene and sanitation.
Communication tools will be developed and used during the awareness-raising campaigns to be
organized on drinking water use, improved drinking water conservation, hygiene in dwellings and
public areass, promotion of sanitation infrastructure for households, regular hand-washing with soap,
and malaria and HIV/AIDS control.
C
.
Institutional
support to the
structures involved
in the project
UA 3.59
million
Capacity-building for the departments and agencies involved in the project
The capacity-building has several sub-components to improve performance in the DWSS sector in
general and in the rural sector in particular. The following have been planned:
The existence of a studies fund has enabled the conduct of: (i) a study on rural sanitation strategy;
(ii) a study on water resources to consolidate the IWRM and update the DHH database; (iii) a
rural DWSS feasibility study for localities in the project area that are not covered and which have
made a request to that effect;
Technical assistance to the DHH: (i) for project supervision, a technical assistant will be recruited
for the Sub-department of Rural Water Supply for a period of 24 months; (ii) a documentation
officer will be recruited for 6 months to help the DHH set up a good archiving system; (iii) an IT
specialist will be recruited for a period of one year to help the DHH optimize the IT system to be
installed and train the staff; and (iv) a monitoring/evaluation expert will be recruited for a period
of 24 months, renewable, for the monitoring/evaluation of the project within the DHH.
Various training sessions in water-sector specializations (planning and monitoring of DWS
works, operation of DWS systems, etc.) are envisaged for the DHH of MINEE, to enable it carry
out its duties;
Procurement of vehicles as well as IT and office equipment for the DHH: 7 vehicles, 10
computers, 6 photocopiers and accessories, 6 scanners;
Support to councils to phase them gradually into their role of project ownership and attendant
supervision. Such support will be provided through an agreement with the Dutch Cooperation
system, which has proven experience in supporting participatory local development as well as
qualified experts in this area.
D Project
management and
coordination
UA 1.20
million
This component concerns general project coordination (allowances, per diem and the operating costs
of the Project Coordination Unit). The operating costs relating to incentive bonuses for national staff
seconded to the project and the overheads (insurance, water and electricity bills, maintenance, sundry
management costs, etc…) shall be borne by the project. I will also finance the auditing of project
accounts (financial audit, procurement audit and technical audit to reconcile the actual outputs and
the expenses).
5
2.2. Technical Solutions Adopted and Alternative Solutions Considered
2.2.1 Cameroon has five rural drinking water supply (DWS) systems adopted in accordance
with the natural environment: (i) developed springs, (ii) equipped wells, (iii) gravity-based DWS
(or simplified water distribution networks), (iv) power-operated DWS, and (v) boreholes
equipped with hand-operated pumps (HOPs). Simplified water distribution networks or gravity-
based DWS option has been selected for the project because the areas it covers have a rolling
topography with abundant sources of good quality water which can be tapped through gravity.
The selection of this system was based on an analysis of the drinking water supply systems
constructed in the country, the requests of the communities concerned and the Government’s
policy to improve the water supply in rural areas. In addition to raising water supply, the gravity-
based system brings water distribution closer to consumers through standpipes and private
connections. Lastly, the solution adopted makes it possible to build the communities’ capacity to
manage simplified DWS network systems. The equipment used and the quality of water supplied
will be in keeping with the applicable international standards.
2.2.2 With respect to sanitation, the wastewater disposal options considered entailed choosing
between VIP latrines and manual flush toilets (MFTs). VIP latrines were preferred to MFTs
which consume more water and require a private connection to function properly. Considering
the Government’s ambitious latrine construction scheme (1,200,000 latrines by 2015), the option
to partially subsidize latrines on private plots was retained for the medium term, pending the
expected catalytic effect of IEC on hygiene and sanitation. Indeed, the awareness-raising should
gradually lead the communities to take full control of the construction and maintenance of their
own latrines. The table below presents the alternatives that were not adopted.
Table 2.2
Project Alternatives Considered and Reasons for Rejection Alternative Brief description Reasons for rejection
DWS: rehabilitation and
construction of boreholes
equipped with hand-operated
pumps
Construction of water-supply
boreholes fitted with hand-
operated pumps; one borehole
per 300 inhabitants with a
minimum flow of 0.5 m³ per
hour.
This type of water point is very rarely used in the
mountainous North-West and South-West regions and is
on the decline in the other regions of the country. Indeed, it
is not suitable for multi-village supply systems and the
service level is rather low. Furthermore, it does not require
a very high degree of community organization to manage.
Hence, it is of limited interest as a rallying point for
community capacity-building.
DWS: rehabilitation and
development of sources
Rehabilitation and
development of water sources
generally located outside the
locality concerned
This option is not suitable for multi-village supply systems
and the service level is rather low. The sanitary conditions
for drawing water are not always satisfactory.
Furthermore, this type of water point is often located
outside the target area and consequently does not really
ease the strain of fetching and transporting water.
Sanitation: the alternative
was to build MFTs
Build MFTs instead of VIP
latrines
MFTs would require a more costly initial investment from
the poor rural communities. Besides, MFTs consume more
water and require a private connection to function
properly, whereas these will be very limited in number in
the medium term. Only the most affluent segment of the
population is requesting MFTs.
6
2.3 Project Type
The current intervention is envisaged as a project loan and grant. Pending the
formulation of a national program and a Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) for the
sector, an autonomous project is the most appropriate instrument.
2.4 Project Cost and Financing Arrangements
2.4.1 The total project cost, net of taxes, is UA 17.25 million, of which UA 11.56 million in
foreign exchange (67%) and UA 5.69 million in local currency (33%). The ADF contribution to
project financing will be a loan of UA 10 million, representing about 58% of the total cost. The
RWSSI Trust Fund will contribute a grant of UA 5 million, representing 29% of the total cost.
The Government will contribute UA 1.5 million and beneficiaries will make a cash contribution
of UA 0.75 million. These costs, which are determined based on technical studies conducted by
the technical services of MINEE include a 10% provision for physical contingencies and a 4%
yearly provision for price escalation. This relatively high rate for physical contingencies stems
from the fact that the size of the network could vary depending on the selected locations for
water points in the villages covered by the network and also owing to the uncertain nature of the
subsoil to be excavated for the laying of buried pipes. The provision for the price escalation
which could stem from a 3% inflation rate in the CEMAC area, has been set at 4% based on the
real price increase observed for recent contracts awarded to MINEE. Furthermore, the
breakdown into local currency and foreign exchange was done based on similar contracts
recently financed by other donors.
Table 1
Project Cost by Component (in UA million) Components
Costs in foreign exchange Costs in local currency Total cost
A. Basic infrastructure development 7.14 2.78 9.92
B. IEC 0.33 0.13 0.46
C. Institutional support 2.63 1.02 3.65
D. Project management 0.00 1.05 1.05
Total base cost 10.10 4.98 15.08
Physical contingencies (10%) 1.01 0.50 1.51
Price escalation (4%) 0.44 0.22 0.66
TOTAL PROJECT COST 11.56 5.69 17.25
Table 2
Project Costs by Financing Source (in UA million)
Financing sources Costs in
F.E. L.C. Total
ADF loan 8.06 1.94 10.00
RWSSI grant 3.50 1.50 5.00
Government 0.00 1.50 1.50
Beneficiaries 0.00 0.75 0.75
Total 11.56 5.69 17.25
7
Table 3
Project Costs by Expenditure Category (in UA million)
Expenditure category Costs in
F.E. L.C. Total
Works 7.51 2.92 10.44
Goods 0.25 0.10 0.34
Services 2.34 0.91 3.25
Functioning 0.00 1.05 1.05
Base cost 10.10 4.98 15.08
Physical contingencies (10%) 1.01 0.50 1.51
Price escalation (4%) 0.44 0.22 0.66
TOTAL PROJECT COST 11.56 5.69 17.25
Table 4
Expenditure Schedule by Component (in UA million)
Table 5
Project Costs By Category and Financing Source (in UA million) Category/ Financing sources ADF RWSSI Government Beneficiaries
(FEICOM)
Total
Works 5.35 4.342 1.50 0.75 11.94
Goods 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39
Services 3.06 0.66 0.00 0.00 3.72
Functioning 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20
TOTAL PROJECT COST 10.00 5.00 1.50 0.75 17.25
2.4.2 The Government’s contribution will cover 12.5% of works and will mainly concern the
construction of offices for the DHH and the Regional Delegations for Water Resources and
Energy. The government will also finance the salaries of civil servants seconded to the project.
The national counterpart funds will be budgeted annually from 2011. The total contribution of
beneficiaries (households and councils) will be UA 0.75 million. Household contributions will be
10% of the cash cost of latrines (UA 0.085 million) and shall be one of the criteria for selection
of beneficiaries. The councils will contribute UA 0.665 million to public water supply and
sanitation through FEICOM, a council investment fund. The RWSSI Trust Fund grant will be
allocated essentially to sanitation infrastructure and passed on to FEICOM under the same
conditions as formulated by the Bank, except for a transfer commission of 0.5% of the grant
amount, which FEICOM will pay from its equity to the CAA.
2 The RWSSI contribution of UA 5 million will finance: (i) works for UA 4.34 million, of which UA 3.49 million will be
allocated to sanitation and UA 0.85 million to DWS; and (ii) assistance services to councils for project supervision
amounting to UA 0.66 million.
Components 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL
A. Infrastructure development 2.27 3.97 3.97 1.13 11.34
B. IEC 0.05 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.52
C. Institutional support 0.42 0.84 1.25 1.25 0.84 4.18
D. Project management 0.12 0.24 0.36 0.36 0.24 1.20
COUT TOTAL DU PROJET 0.59 3.45 5.74 5.74 2.32 17.25
8
2.5 Project Area and Beneficiaries
2.5.1 The rural DWSS project covers 4 (four) of the country’s 10 (ten) regions, namely: the
North-West, South, West and South-West Regions. In administrative terms, the project covers
125 council areas: 25 in the South, 41 in the West, 32 in the North-West and 27 in the South-
West. The drinking water access rates in the project regions are mostly below the national
average: 28.7% in the West, 35.4% in the South, 43.2% in the South-West and 52% in the North-
West. The project area was selected based on: (i) low access rates (33% on average); (ii) the
existence of an inventory of water resource infrastructure in the target areas; (iii) priority given
to water supply in local development plans; (iv) availability of feasibility studies on simplified
networks; and lastly (v) good rural community organization in the target regions.
2.5.2 The project’s beneficiary population is estimated at about 668,000 persons for drinking
water and 750,000 persons for improved sanitation. Hence, the estimated average prevalence rate
of 19% for diseases associated with poor water and sanitation should decline by 30% at project
completion. The project will create temporary jobs during implementation and at least 154
permanent jobs on completion, relating to the management of drinking water networks and
GTCs. Such jobs will mainly be for plumbers and service providers. Furthermore, the water
point management committees and municipal councils concerned will receive training that will
enable them to manage the networks better and strengthen their project planning and supervision
capacity. At the central level, the organization of the DHH and MINEE is expected to improve
through consolidation of equipment and human resources. Indeed, the project provides for the
training of DHH experts, technical assistance in project supervision and control, technical
assistance in archiving and the procurement of appropriate IT equipment. The private sector will
benefit from the project indirectly by bidding for works, goods and service contracts.
2.6 Participatory Approach to Project Identification, Design And Implementation
2.6.1 This operation was conducted using a participatory approach. The various stakeholders
were consulted during preparation of inventories of water supply infrastructure built by the
Government in the four regions. This was done with the support of council mayors, village
development committees, the business community, village chiefs and MINEE. The Bank’s
preparation and appraisal missions visited the target project regions and met with the regional
authorities, council mayors, water management committees and some village chiefs in each
region to assess the project site selection process and the level of involvement of the potential
beneficiaries. These missions noted that the selection of sites and infrastructure was conducted in
a participatory manner which involved all stakeholders. They feature among the priorities
retained in the community development plans drafted under the National Participatory
Development Program (NPDP) supported by the World Bank. Initially focused on 6 regions, the
NPDP currently covers the country’s 10 regions and has led to confirmation of the priority given
to drinking water by the communities. In certain cases, support to councils for planning and
project supervision is provided with the help of Dutch cooperation.
2.6.2 The stakeholders consulted will also be involved in project implementation through the
village follow-up committees, council and regional follow-up committees, water point
9
management committees, participation in financing through FEICOM, participation in behavior
change campaigns on hygiene (through NGOs and women’s associations), works contracting and
infrastructure management with the private sector (large enterprises, SMEs and local jobbers).
As members of the various committees, these stakeholders will conduct a quarterly evaluation of
project execution in the target villages and council areas and give their opinions on the conduct
of the project and propose solutions in case of difficulty.
2.7 Bank Group Experience and Lessons Learnt from Project Design
2.7.1 The main lessons learnt from the implementation of Bank operations in Cameroon in
general and the DWSS sector in particular are essentially of three kinds: (i) the limited capacity
of management structures within the sector (case of DHH) and little coordination between
stakeholders (especially concerning sanitation); (ii) a procurement process which is long and not
transparent (case of PADY); and (iii) major delays in signing agreements and fulfilling
effectiveness and first disbursement conditions for grants and loans (DWSS project in semi-
urban areas). This situation results in poor ownership by beneficiaries which leads to lack of
maintenance. These lessons led the project team to: (i) provide for capacity-building for the
departments and agencies involved in project implementation at the central and decentralized
levels; (ii) take adequate measures to ensure that the procurement process is fluid and more
transparent; (iii) help strengthen the coordination mechanisms for various donors of the DWSS
sector; (iv) request the Government to set up the project management organs in advance so that
they can start preparing the various documents needed to fulfill the conditions precedent to first
disbursement upon conclusion of the negotiations; (v) simplify the conditions for effectiveness
and first disbursement; (vi) provide for the organization and training of water management
committees to ensure greater ownership; and lastly (vii) provide for technical audits to ascertain
that the sums disbursed correspond to the infrastructure constructed (value for money).
2.8 Key Performance Indicators
2.8.1 The main indicators defined for monitoring project impact are: for the impact indicators,
the prevalence rate trends for water-borne diseases and others associated with poor
environmental hygiene and sanitation; and the number of people with access to drinking water;
and for the intermediate effects (i) the additional number of people with access to drinking water
at a shorter distance (less than 500 m), (ii) the number of people who adopt a good attitude to
hygiene and build their own improved latrines, and (iii) the number of jobs created through the
management of simplified networks and gender-sensitive toilet complexes. With respect to the
outputs, performance will be measured through: (i) the number of DWS systems and the number
of public sanitation systems constructed in public buildings; (ii) the number of systems
constructed in private dwellings; (iii) the number of MINEE and DHH experts trained; and (iv)
the number of persons, management committees and municipal councils sensitized and educated
in hygiene and health.
2.8.2 At the start of the project, the INS will conduct a reference data update survey which
will provide additional data to be used for monitoring project impact. Later on, a project
monitoring/evaluation expert will pool all the data on the results of project activities and the
intermediate effects collected by the decentralized services of the relevant ministries, Regional
Directorates for Water Resources, women’s associations involved in IEC, water point
management committees and councils.. The expert will process this data and disseminate it to
10
MINEE project officials, the steering committee and the Bank for analysis and appropriate
corrective action. The INS will also conduct a survey at project completion to determine the
overall project impact on access to drinking water and sanitation, health and water-borne