Top Banner
KIT University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and Large-scale Research Center of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu A.Yu.Konobeyev, U.Fischer, P.E.Pereslavtsev Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology, KIT A.Koning Nuclear Data Section, International Atomic Energy Agency M.Blann 75-5865 Walua Rd. D423, Kailua-Kona, Hi. 967409, US Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS
24

Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

Feb 18, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

KIT – University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and

Large-scale Research Center of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu

A.Yu.Konobeyev, U.Fischer, P.E.Pereslavtsev

Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology, KIT

A.Koning

Nuclear Data Section, International Atomic Energy Agency

M.Blann

75-5865 Walua Rd. D423, Kailua-Kona, Hi. 967409, US

Progress of implementation of the GDH model

in TALYS

Page 2: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

KIT – University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and

Large-scale Research Center of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu

Objective

Discussion of implementation of the GDH model in

the TALYS-1.74 code and results of test calculations

Page 3: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

3

The hybrid and GDH model

J.J.Griffin, 1966 : exciton model

G.D.Harp, J.M.Miller, B.J.Berne, 1968 : master-equation approach

M.Blann, 1971 : “hybrid” model

M.Blann, 1972 : “geometry dependent hybrid” model

M.Blann, H.K.Vonach, 1983 :modification and basic improvements

J.Bisplinghoff, 1986 : critical analysis. Configuration mixing

1994 : cluster emission in GDH

M.Blann, 1996 : hybrid Monte Carlo simulation (HMS)

2005 : improvement of cluster emission calculation in GDH

C.A.Soares Pompeia, B.V.Carlson, 2006 : new analysis

2010-2014 : further improvements

Page 4: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

4

Emission and transition rate

The GDH model

P U,C K O D

t t t t

d d d d

d d d d

0

e2 x

l n x nel 0 n nx x x

d ( p 1,h,U)( 2l 1)T X gD

d ( p,h,E )

inve x x x x xx 2 3

x

( 2S 1) ( ),

g

x 0 x l

V ( )

.

Cluster emission

0 10 20 30 40 50

100

101

Deuteron energy (MeV)

Bertrand (73)

Ep=61.5 MeV

D

K-O

F(1,1)

F(2,0)

EQ

TOTAL

54Fe(p,d)x

d

/d d

(m

b/M

eV

)

Page 5: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

5

GDH + TALYS

TALYS-1.0, 2009

TALYS-1.2, 2011

TALYS-1.74

Exciton and hybrid model

different, sometimes close results

Uncertainty of calculated cross-sections, particle distributions etc.

TALYS-1.0(p,x) reactions, targets Z=12-83,

Ep up to 150 MeV, N = 16,045

Factors default models

GDH

20.3 20.9

1.24 1.27

2.33 1.98

1.33 1.33

5.02

N

1iexp

i

calc

i

exp

i

N

1H

N

1iexp

i

calc

iCE

N

1R

N

1icalc

i

exp

iEC

N

1R

2/11

N

1i

2

expi

expi

N

1i

2

expi

expi

calci

expi

/

)lg()lg(

10S

Page 6: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

6

GDH in TALYS-1.74

GDH: mpreeqmode=5

different GDH options: subroutine gdhinput

added subprograms: 55

modified ALICE/ASH subprograms: 30

new subroutines: 10

modified TALYS subroutines: 6

Memory load: +0.15 %

Page 7: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

7

Nucleon energy distributions

Page 8: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

8

Page 9: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

9

Page 10: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

10

Page 11: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

11

Page 12: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

12

Page 13: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

13

Page 14: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

14

Deuteron energy distributions

Page 15: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

15

Page 16: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

16

Page 17: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

17

Page 18: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

18

Page 19: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

19

a-particle energy distributions

Page 20: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

20

Page 21: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

21

Page 22: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

22

Page 23: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

23

Page 24: Progress of implementation of the GDH model in TALYS

JEFF MeetingNovember 30 – December 4, 2015

24

Conclusion

The GDH model was implemented in TALYS-1.74

First test calculations were performed