Top Banner
Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation Roland Wanker Johann C. Wurzenberger
23

Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

Jun 26, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

Roland WankerJohann C. Wurzenberger

Page 2: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 2

Contents

� Aftertreatment Simulation Strategy

� Aftertreatment Simulation Workflow

� Examples

� 1D: DOC Light-Off and NEDC

Cycle with HC Storage

� 3D: SCR Spray with Multi-

Component Evaporation

� 1D/3D: DPF Flexible Channel

Geometry and Filtration

Model

� Summary

Page 3: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 3

� Reduction of Diesel Engine Emission

Pollutant Formation

Aftertreatment Simulation Strategy, I

Aftertreatment

System Control

Page 4: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 4

Aftertreatment Simulation Strategy, II

Inte

gra

tion

� Identical Physical and Chemical Aftertreatment Models

� BOOST 1D standalone

� BOOST 1D coupled with engine

� BOOST 1D coupled with engine and vehicle

� BOOST 1D as s-function in Matlab/Simulink

� FIRE 2D/3D standalone

Applic

atio

nF

lexib

ility

� Dedicated Kinetic Models for each Specific Application

� Diesel Oxidation Catalyst

� Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF, CSF)

� Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)

� NOx Trap Catalyst

� Three Way Catalyst

� Customer’s Proprietary Kinetic Models

� Use BOOST 1D Aftertreatment as Platform

� User Coding Interface allows 100% Access to all Feature

Page 5: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 5

Aftertreatment Simulation Workflow

End

User-Defined Variation

Parameter

Start

User-Defined Objective

(i.e. based on experimental

data)

Yes/No

Model

Solver

DOE, RSM

OptimizationPost-Processor Check Objective

Ste

p 1

:

Para

mete

r Identific

atio

n

VehicleComponent/System Level

Component/System Level

Ste

p 2

:

Optim

izatio

n

Matlab/Simulink

Vehicle Simulation

3D Simulation1D Simulation

Page 6: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 6

Contents

� Aftertreatment Simulation Strategy

� Aftertreatment Simulation Workflow

� Examples

� 1D: DOC Light-Off and NEDC

Cycle with HC Storage

� 3D: SCR Spray with Multi-

Component Evaporation

� 1D/3D: DPF Flexible Channel

Geometry and Filtration

Model

� Summary

Page 7: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 7

� extended by:

� AVL BOOST/FIRE pre-defined DOC kinetic model

DOC Kinetic Model

� actual mole fraction

� equilibrium mole fraction

Page 8: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 8

DOC Kinetic Model: HC Storage

� Langmuir Isotherm:

Page 9: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 9

� Parameter identification using DOE in combination with

direct optimization tools

DOC: Model Parameterization using Light-Off

Data

Adsorption Desorption Oxidation

Page 10: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 10

� Passenger Car NEDC cycle test

DOC: Influence of HC storage on a NEDC cycle

simulation

Page 11: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 11

Contents

� Aftertreatment Simulation Strategy

� Aftertreatment Simulation Workflow

� Examples

� 1D: DOC Light-Off and NEDC

Cycle with HC Storage

� 3D: SCR Spray with Multi-

Component Evaporation

� 1D/3D: DPF Flexible Channel

Geometry and Filtration

Model

� Summary

Page 12: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 12

SCR, V-HSO System

� Pre (Vor)-Catalyst

� Hydrolysis, SCR and Oxidation Catalyst

SAE 2005-01-0948: (Wurzenberger and Wanker, AVL)

� Steady-state kinetic model validation

� Transient kinetic model validation

� Component level simulation

� System level simulation

SAE 2006-01-0643: (Birkhold et al., BOSCH)

� Urea spray model validation

� Wallfilm model validation

� Evaporation and thermolysis reaction model validation

CLEERS 2006: (Masoudi, BOSCH)

� „BOSCH Urea Dosing Approach for Future Emissions

Legislature for Light and Heavy Duty SCR Applications“

Page 13: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

3 May, 2007 | Page 13

Advanced Simulation Technologies

Progress in SCR spray simulation

Spray wall interaction:

• multi-component evaporation

• heat conduction in solid walls via lateral heat conduction

• heat transfer between droplets and wall

• wall temperature dependent splashing model

Spray / gas phase:

• multi-component evaporation

• urea/water mixture properties

• thermolysis

• hydrolysis

Page 14: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

3 May, 2007 | Page 14

Advanced Simulation Technologies

Multi-component evaporation model with integratedurea thermolysis

� Based on Abramson/Sirignano single component model with balancesfor mass and heat transfer in gas film around drop

� Coupled equations for mass transferand heat flux entering the drop solved

with iterative procedure

� Arrhenius approach for thermolysis:

H 0 (l)2

H 0 (g)2

H 02

(NH ) CO2 2

I.

(g) OH (l) OH 22 →

(g) HNCO (g) NH l)or (s CO)(NH3

kJ/mol 185.5 H

22+ →

+=∆

(g) CO (g) NH (g) OH (g) HCNO232 +→+

−⋅−=

RT

EAD

dt

dma

d

urea expπ

� Evaporation

� Thermolysis

� Hydrolysis

Page 15: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

3 May, 2007 | Page 15

Advanced Simulation Technologies

Testcase with 30000 cells ( 65 kg/h , 10 mg AdBlue per pulse)

Page 16: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 16

18°

18°

Spray Calibration

Spray Angle and Pattern is Adapted to Spray Box

Measurement

Page 17: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 17

Urea Distribution Study I

Base configuration

Urea vapor mass fraction at centre plane of pipe

Urea droplet size and distribution

Side injection Flow bypass Side bump S-bend

Investigation of urea vapor distribution during

steady-state operating conditions

� Impact of different pipe/injection geometries

Page 18: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 18

Urea Distribution Study II

Investigation of urea vapor distribution

during transient injection pulse

� Impact of mixing device

20 ms 40 ms 60 ms 80 ms

0 vapor concentration (ppm) 1000

Page 19: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 19

Contents

� Aftertreatment Simulation Strategy

� Aftertreatment Simulation Workflow

� Examples

� 1D: DOC Light-Off and NEDC

Cycle with HC Storage

� 3D: SCR Spray with Multi-

Component Evaporation

� 1D/3D: DPF Flexible Channel

Geometry and Filtration

Model

� Summary

Page 20: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 20

Generic Wall Flow DPF Model

� Different Channel Diameters(Octo-Square, Asymmetric Channels, Wavy-Cells)

� Inlet/Outlet Plugs

� Ash as Layer, Plug or Combination

� Deposition as in Depth and Cake Layers

�Impact on Pressure Drop Model

�Impact on Deposition and Regeneration Model

Page 21: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 21

Loading of Asymmetric Channel Structures

Pressure Drop of Empty DPF Pressure Drop of Loaded DPF

Experimental Data: SAE-2005-01-0949, Ibiden

OC has lower ∆∆∆∆p

OC has

higher ∆∆∆∆p

SC OC1 OC2 Square Cell (SC)

Octo-Square Cell (OC)

Page 22: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 22

Loading and ∆∆∆∆p due to Depth/Cake Filtration

Pressure Drop Split into Depth and Cake Portions

Soot Mass Split in a Depth and Cake Layer

Transition Soot Loading is Assumed as Depth Filtration Threshold

Experimental Data:

SAE-2000-01-1016,

Konstandopoulos

depth cake

Page 23: Progress in DOC, DPF and SCR Simulation

CLEERS, Dearborn, May 2007 | Page 23

Summary

� Catalyst and DPF Models

� robust solvers

�validated models for DOC, SCR, DPF,…

�automatic parameter identification (DOE and optimization)

� Integration of Aftertreatment Simulation

�standalone 1D and 3D

�engine combustion and pollutant

formation fully integrated with exhaust line and reactive aftertreatment devices

�vehicle + engine + emissions (measured)

linked with exhaust line and reactive aftertreatment devices