Top Banner
19

PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Apr 01, 2015

Download

Documents

Adan Deaton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.
Page 2: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study

J. Bourgon P.C., O.C.Canada, May 2009

Page 3: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Learning From the Past

• 1975-1984:

• Growing deficits and debt (1975)• Chronic deficit (1978 )• A divergent course (1982)

• Growth, prosperity (Post-War)

Page 4: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Federal Net Debt

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1961-62 1966-67 1971-72 1976-77 1981-82 1986-87 1991-92 1996-97 2001-02 2006-07

Year

Perc

ent o

f GD

P

Page 5: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Federal Budgetary Surplus or Deficit

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

1961-62 1966-67 1971-72 1976-77 1981-82 1986-87 1991-92 1996-97 2001-02 2006-07

Year

Perc

ent o

f GD

P

1982

1978

Page 6: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Changing Course

• 1984-1993: A balanced operating budget, structural reforms and agenda overload

• Across the board cuts• A balanced operating budget (1987-88)• Not enough, not fast enough

• Structural reforms• Canada-USA Free Trade and NAFTA• Tax reform• Cap on transfers

Page 7: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Federal Net Debt

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1961-62 1966-67 1971-72 1976-77 1981-82 1986-87 1991-92 1996-97 2001-02 2006-07

Year

Perc

ent o

f GD

P

Page 8: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Federal Operating Surplus or Deficit

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

1961-62 1966-67 1971-72 1976-77 1981-82 1986-87 1991-92 1996-97 2001-02 2006-07Year

Perc

ent o

f GD

P

Page 9: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Federal Budgetary Surplus or Deficit

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

1961-62 1966-67 1971-72 1976-77 1981-82 1986-87 1991-92 1996-97 2001-02 2006-07

Year

Per

cent

of G

DP

Page 10: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Charting a new course -1993-99

• The approach

• One team • A free hand• No target

• The process

• Common guidelines

Page 11: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Program Review Test: Decision Tree

Role of Government Test

Public Interest Test

Federalism Test Partnership Test

Efficiency Test

Affordability Test

Ab

an

do

n / T

rans

fer

Page 12: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Charting a new course -1993-00

• The approach

• One team • A free hand• No target

• The process

• Common guidelines• The machinery

• DMs committee• Cabinet committee• PM and Cabinet

• The chronology

Page 13: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Federal Budgetary Surplus or Deficit

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

1961-62 1966-67 1971-72 1976-77 1981-82 1986-87 1991-92 1996-97 2001-02 2006-07

Year

Per

cent

of G

DP

Page 14: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Federal Net Debt

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1961-62 1966-67 1971-72 1976-77 1981-82 1986-87 1991-92 1996-97 2001-02 2006-07

Year

Perc

ent o

f GD

P

Page 15: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Cumulative Provincial/TerritorialSurplus or Deficit

-3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00

Year

Page 16: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Changes in Federal Department Spending 1997-98 Realtive to 1994-95

Indian & Northern Aff airs

Regional Agencies

Industry - Department

Transport

Natural Resources

Human Resources Dev.

Environment

Fisheries & Oceans

Industry - S&T

Heritage and Culture

Agriculture

International Assistance

Foreign Aff airs & Int'l Trade

General Government Services

Defense

Veterans Aff airs

Parliament & Governor General

Citizenship and Immigration

Canada Mortgage & Housing

J ustice

Solicitor General

Health

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20

Percent Reduction

Page 17: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

Public Service Employment

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

Year

Page 18: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.

PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study

Page 19: PROGRAM REVIEW – A Canadian Case Study J. Bourgon P.C., O.C. Canada, May 2009.