Top Banner
11/8/2013 1
16

Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Jan 12, 2016

Download

Documents

reilly

Program Evaluation and Program Improvement. Kirsten Bennett MS RD LD November 8, 2013 Asthma Educator Institute Albuquerque, New Mexico. Scope of Practice. The NAECB definition of Asthma Educator includes: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

111/8/2013

Page 2: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Kirsten Bennett MS RD LDNovember 8, 2013Asthma Educator InstituteAlbuquerque, New Mexico

Page 3: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

3

Scope of Practice

The NAECB definition of Asthma Educator includes:

“…. The educator monitors asthma education program outcomes and recommends modifications to improve quality and effectiveness.”

(NAECB Candidate Handbook, 2002, p. 1)

11/8/2013

Page 4: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

All improvement will require change

but not all change will be an improvement!

G. Langley et al The Improvement Guide. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1996; xxi

Page 5: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

5

Application of Quality Improvement (QI) Methodology in Asthma Education

How can we apply QI methodology and strategies to individual care of patients with asthma?

How can we apply QI methodology and strategies to healthcare systems to improve asthma care and outcomes?

11/8/2013

Page 6: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Four Types of Program Evaluation

Programimplementation

ends here

Impact

Process

Formative

Outcome

Programimplementatio

noccurs here

Page 7: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Evaluation

Development

Evaluation

Implementation

Page 8: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

3 Steps to Successful QI Define the best care that

can be provided in this setting

Identify the gap between current practice and best practice

Participate in closing that gap

Page 9: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

F -O -C -U -S Find a time to talk Organize your team Clarify processes Understand variations Select a process to

improve

QI is a Team Sport!

Page 10: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Identify the gap between current practice and best practice (or current care for the individual)What is the baseline?What are the potential causes of our baseline observations?

What are potential alternatives to current practice?

Page 11: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

S3 : The Goals of QI (Individuals or Groups)

Simple operational change

Short cycle evaluation of change

Sustainable after change is made

Page 12: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Applying QI to the Evaluation and Change Process

Formative P (plan)

What do we need to do and for whom and by when? Process

D (do) How will we attempt this process and who specifically will be

responsible for the various parts? Outcome

S (study) How will we measure what we are doing and what will we

compare it to? Impact

A (act) Did this attempt at change or implementation meet our

objective?

Page 13: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

13

Where do you fit?

PDSA personality exercise

11/8/2013

Page 14: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

Outcomes = Benefits to or changes

Inputs

Resources dedicated

or consumed

by the program;

Constraints

Activities

What the program does with its inputs

to fulfill its mission

Outputs

The direct products of

program activities

Outcomes

Initial

All providers using EBP

with all asthma patients

Intermediate

Better asthma

control and QOL

Long-term

Fewer ED visits;

lower cost for

management

Page 15: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

15

Let’s Practice

PDSA handouts Flip Charts with Markers Scenario 1: How will we know if the current

asthma management plan documented for a patient (or population of patients) results in acceptable control (routinely and objectively?

Scenario 2: Reduce ED visits in a particular patient.

Scenario 3: Ensure every child with asthma has at least one planned visit for asthma management every 6 months.

11/8/2013

Page 16: Program Evaluation and Program Improvement

1611/8/2013

Thank you