Top Banner
Program Design in Malaysia Carbon/Energy Reporting Program
16

Program Design in Malaysia - 国立環境研究所 · 2020. 2. 6. · Malaysia National Target: 40% Reduction. in terms of emission intensity of GDP. Low Carbon City Framework (LCCF)

Feb 13, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Program Design in MalaysiaCarbon/Energy Reporting Program

  • • UTM and AIM have collaborated with City of Putrajaya and Iskandar Region Development Authority to create low carbon society plans (and completed).

    • Both of these cities are now moving on to the next stage “implementation” to realize low carbon society.

    2

    Low Carbon Society (LCS) Plans in Malaysia

    Implementation

    LCS Planningthrough quantitative approach

    Next Stage

    GHG Emission & Reduction

    LCS Policies & Actions

    City level LCS Plans

    COMPLETED!!

  • • In order to accomplish low carbon society certainly, progress and/or achievement of policies have to be checked periodically.

    • Thus, monitoring of policy implementation is indispensable in implementa-tion stage.

    Necessity of Monitoring Scheme

    3

    Without Monitoring With MonitoringBase

    Target

    Current Status…? Achievable..?

    Base

    Target

    Current Status

    Unachievable!

    More actions are required to fill the

    gap!

    Monitoring enables policy makers to confirm the current status of progress and to consider how to fill the gap between expected trend and actual trend

  • • Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG) has operated Carbon Reduction Reporting Program for mid-small scale buildings, which aims to enhance mitigation actions.

    • The program asks buildings to monitor and report their CO2 emission as well as mitigation actions taken by owners and/or tenants.

    Best Practice in Tokyo

    4CO2 Emission Reduction (10% reduction has achieved)

    Annual Report Submission

    Buildings

    1. Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission in Previous FY- Calculate CO2 emissions from previous FY’s fuel, energy, electricity, water and sewerage use

    2. Mitigation Actions Taken in Previous FY- Choose measures taken from 255 option menu which has been categorized by TMG

    TMG

    Disclosure Floor AreaCO2 emission/intensityImplementation status

    Continuous Efforts on the Global Warming Measures- Realize continuous understanding/management of energy consumption- Continuous efforts and improvement on the global warming measures

    http://portal.ppj.gov.my/web/guest/lesen_perniagaan_publichttp://portal.ppj.gov.my/web/guest/lesen_perniagaan_public

  • • Collaborative team comprised by UTM/TMG/AIM is trying to transfer the reporting program which has been implemented by TMG.

    • We works together with Putrajaya Corporation (PJC) and Iskandar Region Develop-ment Authorities to design and introduce a reporting program in these cities.

    • Trainings, workshops and intensive discussions many times among both cities’ staffs, TMG’s staffs and experts have been conducted so far.

    Transfer Knowledge from Tokyo to Malaysia

    Workshop

    Training

    Discussion

    Site VisitTraining

  • Proposed Scheme and its ImpactCase in City of Putrajaya

  • 7

    Proposed Scheme (1/2)

    1. Measure energy use 2. Estimate emission 3. Create action plan

    Consultation by experts

    Annual Report Submission

    Assessment / Support

    1. Building Profile

    Annual Report

    2. Energy Consumption & GHG emission

    Name Admin Office Complex

    Floor Area(m2)

    Gross 2,000Air Conditioned 1,357

    3. Actions for Emission Reduction

    Building Owners

    [Assessment]- the progress of taking actions- the status of achievement

    [Support]- dispatch experts / consultation- provide support tool- provide incentives / awards

    141

    67

    219

    224

    219

    341

    30

    29

    13

    12

    80

    76

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

    Mandatory+ Voluntary

    Mandatory

    with

    Pro

    g.CM

    BaU

    2025

    2025

    2014

    2007 Energy Use

    (Actual)

    Energy Use(projection)

    Phase 1(Gov't bldg)

    Phase 2(PA&U bldg)

    Phase 3(Comm bldg)

    • Buildings are required to submit report including energy consumption, GHG emission and action plan for reducing their emission.

    • The participating entities can receive feedbacks and support from the authority.

    Putrajaya

    http://portal.ppj.gov.my/web/guest/lesen_perniagaan_publichttp://portal.ppj.gov.my/web/guest/lesen_perniagaan_public

  • 8

    Proposed Scheme (2/2)

    Malaysia National Target: 40% Reductionin terms of emission intensity of GDP

    Low Carbon City Framework (LCCF)

    Putrajaya Green City 2025

    Existing InstrumentsMalaysian Standard (MS) 1525

    Green Building Certification Green Technology Financing Scheme (GTFS)

    Energy Management of Electricity Energy Regulations (EMEER) 2008

    Regulation on Energy Use

    Database, Certification, etc. Financing Scheme

    City of XXXCity of YYY

    Putrajaya Building Sector Carbon Emissions Monitoring & Reporting

    Programme

    Around 600 ktCO2 of emission can be reduced

    FeedbacksInteractions

    Expansion of Low Carbon Cities

    • The proposed scheme is an additional instrument to enhance the function of existing instruments for enhancing low carbon cities in Malaysia.

    BCiS

    Putrajaya

  • 9

    Expected Impacts of the Programme

    • In order to introduce the programme smoothly, the target buildings shall be expanded gradually.

    • Expected impacts are estimated according to Putrajaya Green City 2025. (abt 600 ktCO2 emission reduction at maximum; amounting to abt MYR 450 (US$ 100) million in saving through the reduction in energy use. )

    Gov’t buildings(sample cases)

    Phase 2(2019-2020)

    Phase 3(2021-2025)

    Gov’tbldg

    Public Amenity & Facilites bldg

    Commercial bldg

    Contribution to Emission Reduction

    (in total)

    100ktCO2

    170ktCO2

    600ktCO2

    Establishment of Taskforce

    Phase 1(2016-2018)

    Pilot project Phase(early 2016)

    amounting to about MYR450 (US$ 100) million in saving through the reduction in energy use

    Putrajaya

  • Proposed Scheme and its ImpactCase in Iskandar Malaysia

  • 11

    Proposed Scheme

    • Building submits reports summarizing their energy usage, emissions and actions to the authorities annually.

    • IRDA and/or 5-Las assess(s) the achievements of actions, provide(s) feedbacks and supports to encourage building to take actions.

    Iskandar

  • 12

    Expected Impacts of the Programme

    • Expected impacts of the programme are estimated according to Low Carbon Society Blue Print for Iskandar Malaysia towards 2025.

    • Expected energy saving amount is around 380 ktoe in 2025 at maximum which corresponds to around 2,000 kt CO2. Accompanying cost saving will reach around MYR 1.3 (US$ 0.3) billion.

    Emission Reduction: abt 2,000 ktCO2Cost Saving: abt MYR 1.3 (US$ 0.3) billion

    Iskandar

  • Positive Feedbacks of the Programme

  • • Various positive feedbacks are expected through the implementation of the Program.

    14

    Other Positive Feedbacks of the Programme

    Contribution to real measured GHG emission

    reduction

    Potential actual energy cost savings

    Possible enhancement in the scoring in Green Building Index, other

    certifications, etc.

    National and international exposure/publicity

  • Conclusion

  • • UTM and AIM have collaborated with City of Putrajaya and Iskandar Region Develop-ment Authority to create low carbon society plans and completed.

    • Both cities are now moving on to the implementation stage to create LCS. In implementation stage, monitoring of policy implementation is indispensable.

    • Collaborative team comprised by UTM/TMG/AIM is trying to transfer the reporting program which has been implemented by TMG.

    • The proposed Reporting Programs are expected to contribute emission reduction in Putrajaya (abt 600 ktCO2 at maximum) and Iskandar (abt 2,000 ktCO2 at maximum).

    • Various positive feedbacks are expected through the implementation of the Program.

    16

    Conclusion

    スライド番号 1Low Carbon Society (LCS) Plans in MalaysiaNecessity of Monitoring SchemeBest Practice in TokyoTransfer Knowledge from Tokyo to Malaysiaスライド番号 6Proposed Scheme (1/2)Proposed Scheme (2/2)Expected Impacts of the Programmeスライド番号 10Proposed SchemeExpected Impacts of the Programmeスライド番号 13Other Positive Feedbacks of the Programmeスライド番号 15Conclusion