Private Nuisance – use of property that interferes with your neighbor’s use and enjoyment of her property – defenses include failure to demonstrate causation failure to demonstrate injury balancing of the equities – coming to the nuisance
Jan 11, 2016
Private Nuisance
– use of property that interferes with your neighbor’s use and enjoyment of her property
– defenses includefailure to demonstrate causationfailure to demonstrate injurybalancing of the equities
– coming to the nuisance
Public nuisance
– unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public
– significant interference with the public health, safety or comfort
– defenses include failure to show causation failure to demonstrate harm balancing of the equities
Trespass
interference with the possession of property (chattels or land)– must prove: invasion; ownership; disturbance in the
property– need not demonstrate physical harm– need not prove wrongful motive– need not be a person
Negligence
failing to do something that a reasonable person, guided by ordinary considerations, would do
– defendant under a duty to conform to a standard of conduct– defendant breached that duty– “proximate cause” : injury would not have occurred but for that
action– plaintiff suffered loss
Strict liability
– assessment of liability for damages without a showing of negligence
– person engaged in ultrahazardous activity is liable for any harm that results, regardless of the care exercised to prevent that harm
Exercises
Sue Jones stores gasoline in a 55 gallon drum in her yard. A prankster throws a lit match into the drum. The explosion damages the neighbor’s garage. Cause(s) of action? Does Sue have any defense?
Michael Jackson comes into your yard and starts singing. What can you do?
Paula Jones, after winning a big lawsuit, buys a condo near the airport. She brings a nuisance action, arguing that the airplanes make too much noise. What are her chances?
Why not rely on common law?
Solid waste
RCRA Subtitle D (HSWA 1984)
– EPA required states to designate open dumps (those that posed a risk to public health/safety; 1979)
– required EPA to establish criteria for sanitary landfills
most provisions effective 1993 location and operation liners, caps and collection systems required groundwater monitoring closure and post-closure guarantees
Solid waste is primarily a state program
landfills must have a state permitEPA approves the state’s permitting system
Result?
increased the cost of managing solid waste, decreased the number of landfills
Number of landfills declined 62% between 1988 and 1995
Wisconsin lost 717 landfills; New York went from 1600 to 38
Effect on capacity: crisis?
Overall, no. —why?
Waste management strategies
recycling (about 28%) incineration siting of regional landfills interstate transport of waste
For Tuesday
CERCLA introduction Writing assignment is due Hand out case studies
RCRA subtitle C (quick review)
Two-step determination (solid; hazardous)– Listed or characteristic
Threshold determination– Over 220 lbs. in any month (2.2 lbs of acutely haz)
makes you a SQG; over 2,200 lbs. a LQG
Cradle to grave and universal tracking manifest Generator determines waste
Interstate transport of waste
49 states are exporting waste (24% of all municipal solid waste; 39 million tons)
percentages are increasing over time– NY: 8.2 million tons– Fresh Kills landfill (27% of all NY garbage)
some states don’t want to be “dumping grounds” (especially PA, VA and Michigan)
END OF THE ROAD: Mangled cars from the World Trade Center site at Fresh Kills landfill in New York
States v. the Commerce Clause
Version One: states seek to ban waste importation Version Two: local governments seek to control the
flow of waste Discussion questions