Exploring PPP options to renovate buildings, best practices, and applicability for the Palais des Nations Private and Public Partnerships (PPP) Seminar The Strategic Heritage Plan (SHP) Renovation of the Palais des Nations Mr. Francesco Savarese 6 December, 2012
30
Embed
Private and Public Partnerships (PPP) Seminar The ... · Private and Public Partnerships (PPP) Seminar The Strategic Heritage Plan (SHP) Renovation of the Palais des Nations Mr. Francesco
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Exploring PPP options to renovate buildings, best practices, and applicability for the Palais des Nations
Private and Public Partnerships (PPP) Seminar
The Strategic Heritage Plan (SHP) Renovation of the Palais des Nations
Mr. Francesco Savarese 6 December, 2012
History of the Palais des Nations
Overview of the Palais des Nations
Pending Challenges
Renovation Concept
Preparing for the SHP
Funding for the SHP
Future of the SHP
Briefing Outline
History of the Palais des Nations
The Palais is one of the biggest and busiest conference centres in the world.
Approximately 10,000 meetings are held here every year attended by thousands of delegates.
History of the Palais des Nations
Since its construction in 1937 the Palais des Nations included:
Secretariat building Council building Assembly building Library building
in 1973 the E-building increased Office and Conference space
…and
History of the Palais des Nations
The League of Nations included 58 Member States and the United Nations
includes today 193 Member States.
The Palais des Nations serves as a vibrant platform for the United Nations’ daily work in Europe.
Originally constructed for the League of Nations and handed over to the United Nations in 1946.
The layout of the original building still reflects the requirements and the technologies available at the time it was built.
2,800 Offices
32 Major Conference Rooms
4,000 Staff
Overview of the Palais des Nations
Building E (1976)
10,000 Meetings per year held
28,000 Delegates per year attend
100,000 Paying visitors per year tour
Original buildings (1937)
Pending Challenges
What is behind the facade
Rusting, Leaking, and Clogged Pipes
Thousands of metres of piping are in need of replacement
Deteriorating Piping Systems
Pending Challenges
Corrosion and aging of concrete structures
Skylights structurally unsound and not thermally insulated
Deteriorating Building Structure
Pending Challenges
Current health, safety and fire standards are not met
Outdated electrical installations
Asbestos presence impedes upgrades and refurbishments
Health and Safety Standards
Pending Challenges
Poor sound quality from old analog interpretation/recording equipment
Negative impact on conference effectiveness
Interruption to conferences caused by equipment breakdowns
Conference rooms cannot be fully utilized due to rigid configuration
Outdated Conference Rooms
Pending Challenges
Office Space Utilization
Investigate the potential to increase office space utilization and add up to 800 desks
Reconfigure existing office space to gain efficiencies
Convert existing under utilized spaces into additional office space
Pending Challenges
Pending Challenges
Accessibility to Persons with Disabilities
Stairs
Elevators
Toilets
Braille signs
Premises built when persons with disables’ rights were not recognized
Energy Efficiency
Additional capital investments needed: 1600 windows dating from 1937 (in progress) Roof and skylights (in progress) LED and automatic lighting (in progress) Solar panels (in progress) E-Building façade (SHP) And more….
Fuel Electricity Water
Results obtained with resources:
- 490 MWh/year less electricity
- 8 000m³/year less water
- 34%/year less CO2 emissions.
Pending Challenges
Renovation Concept
“Strategic Heritage Plan”
(SHP)
The UNOG premises must be updated in order to remain a centre of excellence for international diplomacy
The complexity and cost of the problems facing the Palais necessitate a comprehensive approach the….
Renovation Concept
Goals and Key Objectives
To ensure the continued function of the Palais and serve the Member States as an essential conference centre;
To safeguard the health and safety of delegates and staff by meeting current standards and regulations;
To reduce operational and maintenance costs by providing a sustainable and energy efficient facility;
To consolidate Geneva United Nations staff within a single compound through efficient space utilization;
To enable full accessibility to persons with disabilities;
To preserve the historical and heritage value of the site.
Renovation Concept
Key Project Features To maintain the visitor’s experience
To respect the UNESCO classification of the League of Nations’ institutional memory
To be the most cost effective solution
Extraterritorial premises are not subject to specific Host Country authority
• Strict security controls
• No need for building permits
Renovation Concept
.
Proposed Implementation Phasing
Phase 2 Phase 1
Phase 3 Phase 4
Renovation Concept
SHP Preliminary Cost Estimate and Duration
Refurbishment & Construction CHF 392M
Associated Costs CHF 34M
Consultancy & Project Management CHF 79M
Contingencies CHF 113m
Total CHF 618m
Implementation Duration 8 Years
SHP - Project Stages
Activity Outcome Tasks and Deliverables
Pre-Planning Completed 2007-2011
Planning In progress 2012-2013
Draft progress report of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly at the 68th Session
June 2013
Implementation Not yet begun
Duration 8 years
Develop implementation alternatives for recommendation to Member States
• Dedicated SHP project management team
•Engage the Programme Management Company
SHP Team and Programme
Management Company on board
•Implementation strategy •Space efficiency plan •Risk management plan •Detailed Cost plan •Funding alternatives, PPP
Design and Construction
Phased renovation utilizing swing space
Dependent on approval by Member States subject to completion of the NY-CMP
•Preliminary Study •Conceptual Engineering & Architectural Study
Member States approved: • Planning phase • 8 year implementation
option
Preparing for the SHP
Preparing for the SHP
Current Status:
Energy savings projects (Swiss contribution): Completed by Dec 2013
Emergency repairs (UN funds): on going
Dedicated SHP team: in place
Programme Management Firm: in place
Risk Management Consultant: soliciting bids
Space utilization and swing space consultant: request for expression of interest
Overall strategies for PPP funding: in progress
New 1,600 windows
Skylights and roofs insulation
New LED and automatic lighting
New solar panels, photovoltaic and thermal
New air conditioning units
Upgrading the Building Management System (20,000 control points)
Preparing for the SHP
Swiss Funded Energy Saving Projects:
Thermal insulation and waterproofing of roofs
Skylight of General Assembly room
New accessible elevators
New toilets for disabled
Storm water drainage
Rehabilitation of concrete structures
New Courtroom
Preparing for the SHP
UN funded Urgent Maintenance projects:
Detailed implementation plan
Detailed multi-capital investment plan
Alternative Funding options
Governance plan and communication strategy
Project administration and management plan
Procurement plan
Heritage preservation plan
Preparing for the SHP
SHP Team and Programme Management Firm:
Activities for reporting to the General Assembly at the 68th Session, fall 2013 :
Funding
Assessed contribution from Member States (current funding model for capital projects)
Tennant rental income to off-set costs
Donor sponsorship of specific restoration works:
• Conference Rooms
• Visitor’s experience • Renovation of annexes, Etc.
Sale of a portion of UN real estate to private investors
Host Country long-term low cost loan(s)
Public and Private Partnerships (PPP) projects
Other options to be considered?
Preparing for the SHP
Alternative Funding Options
The Strategic Heritage Plan is essential to ensure that the Palais will continue to serve as a safe, cost-effective and sustainable conference and diplomacy centre for Member States.
To develop a proper funding strategy, all alternatives must be explored and supported by a cost benefit analysis.
It is essential to meet Member States mandate that this exploration be completed with the next three months