The Non-Electric Dental Pump Anna Bandecca, Katie Beittenmiller, Samantha Shoemaker, Margaret-Anne Smith Advisors: Conrad M. Zapanta, Ph.D., Nicole Huang, Angela Lai MOTIVATION • Dental decay affects 3.5 billion people worldwide • Resources for dental care are scarce in impoverished areas • Facilities have noelectricity • Dental tools are bulky, heavy, & difficult to transport • Procedures to treat dental decay require suctioning ofblood, saliva • Traditional pumps use electricity • Other solutions are uncomfortable for the patient, expensive NEED STATEMENT:A portable method to provide fluid suctionfor medical practitionersin any locationto allow for increasedmobile medical services. IMPORTANCE • 92% of people aged 20-64 have had at least one cavity 16 • 190 million new cases of dental decay emerge each year 15 • Volunteer organizations (e.g. Global Medical Brigades) treat dental decay cases • No electricity, difficulty transporting tools Current Solutions for Fluid Suction OUR SOLUTION • Utilize fluid mechanics to generate suction • Requires pressurized air to flow through diameter reduction (venturi) • Pressure in smaller diameter decreases to compensate for increased air velocity à Suction generated (Bernoulli’s principle, below) FINAL PROTOTYPE RESULTS REFERENCES 1. "Oral Heal th ." W o rl d Heal th Organ i zati o n .Accessed No vemb er 1 0 , 2 01 6. http ://www.wh o.i nt/med i acen tre/factsh eets/fs3 1 8 /en /. 2. "Gu m Disease an d Heart Disease -- Wh at Yo u Sh o u l d Kn ow. " Web M D. A ccessed No vemb er 1 0 , 2 01 6. http ://www. web md . co m/o ral -heal th /featu res/h eal th y-teeth - h eal th y-h eart. 3. "HP I R esearch B riefs - Yo u n g Ad u ltsM o stLikely to P urch ase ..." Accessed No vemb er 1 0 , 20 1 6. http ://www.ad a.o rg/~/med ia/ADA/Scien ce an d R esearch /HP I/Fi l es/HP IB ri ef_0 8 1 4 _3 .ash x. 4. "Vo lu n teerin g in P u blic Health | P ub licHealth .o rg." P ub licHealth .o rg. 20 16 .Accessed No vemb er 1 0 , 2 01 6. http ://www.pu b lich ealth .org/vo lu n teerin g/. 5. Vo l u n teeri n g i n th e Uni ted States. Accessed No vemb er 1 0 , 2 0 16 .h ttp://www.b l s.go v/n ews.rel ease/p d f/vo l u n .pd f. 6. Amo l Ash o k Bah ekar, Sarab jeet Sin gh , San d eep Sah a, Jan o s M o ln ar, Ro hit Aro ra. “Th e p revalen ce an d in ciden ce o f co ro nary h eart d isease is sign ifican tly increased in p erio d o n titis: A meta-an alysis”. American Heart Jo u rn al, Vo lume 1 5 4, Issu e 5, Novemb er 2 0 0 7, Pages 8 3 0 -83 7 ,ISSN 0 00 2-8 70 3, h ttp ://d x. d o i . o rg/1 0 . 1 0 16 /j .ah j .20 07 .06 . 037. 7. "V acu u m Asp i rato r P u mp ." SP SCIENCEWARE Va cu um Asp irato rPump - 21 TP48 |3 29 47 -00 00 - Gra i n ger. Grain ger, n.d .Web .2 4 Nov. 2 01 6. 8. To p p a, Sab rin a, “On e-Th ird o f the Wo rld ’s P op ulatio n Su ffers Fro m Un treated To o th Decay”. Time Health Research , M arch 2 0 1 5. <h ttp://ti me.co m/3 7 3 29 25 /o ne- th i rd -wo rl d -to o th-d ecay/> 9. “Den tal C ari es (To o th Decay) i n A d u l ts (A ge 2 0 to 6 4)”. h ttp s://www. ni d cr.n i h. go v/DataStati sti cs/Fi n d DataB yTo p i c/Den tal C ari es/Den tal C ari esA d u l ts2 0 to 64 . h tm ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • We would like to thank Dr. Conrad Zapanta and Angela Lai for all of their help and advising on this project. We would also like to thank our project mentor, Nicole Huang, who developed the first prototype and without whom this final prototype would not exist. Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the Undergraduate Research Office for providing the funding for this project. Solution 1: Personal battery poweredvacuum • 1 – 3 hour battery life • 110 – 240V battery • Small collecting canister Solution 2: Dixie cup – used inmobile clinics in rural areas • Inefficient (slows procedure) • Uncomfortable for patients Simulated runtime withpressure regulator at 40 psi • No moving parts • simple & easy to clean " + 1 2 " ( + ℎ " = ( + 1 2 ( ( + ℎ ( • No electricity required • Compact Venturi System CAD model of final prototype • Pumped up via manual foot pump to minimumof 40 psi in ~45 minutes • Run time of ~25 minutes • Carrying suitcase for portability • Aluminum air tank to holdpressurized air • Foot pedal for controlling suction • Pressure regulator to extendruntime • Collecting canister on side of tank • Stage 1 Testing (Water): Ensure backflow is eliminated, flow through the tubing is smooth and uninterrupted, and determine a relative suction rate à Results: 10 mL/15 sec = 0.66 mL/s suction rate, nobackflow • Stage 2 Testing (Glycerol as Imitation Blood): Determine if increased viscosity affects device performance à Results: 8mL/15 sec = 0.53 mL/ssuction rate Due to the increased viscosity, pressure built in the venturi that was enough to drive liquid through the air tubing to the foot pedal Liquid was found coming out of the3rd connection spot from the pedal Conclusions: While the pump had no issues suctioning water, increased viscosity led to backflow and pressure buildup. Therefore, we recommend the device be used for basic dental procedures involving minimal blood rather than major procedures.