Principals’ Retreat October 7, 2011
Jan 11, 2016
Principals’ RetreatOctober 7, 2011
Goals For Today:
• Provide context and background for Project LIFT.
• Offer insight on the strategic plan development.
• Present a cutting edge human capital strategy and assess interest.
• Garner your best/most innovative thinking and input to inform strategic plan development.
• Clarify the Communities In Schools Partnership.
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools
Welcome: Project LIFT’s Biggest Fans
Anna Spangler Nelson
Stick Williams
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools
Project LIFT: Changing the Odds
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools
Charlotte: A Tale of Two Cities
• 70% for all CMS students• Highest graduation rates
~ 92% Mallard Creek High School~ 92% Providence High School
• Lowest graduation rates~ 58% West Mecklenburg High School~ 52% Waddell High School~ 51% West Charlotte High School
Led to decision by Study Group to define initiative boundaries as West Charlotte High School Corridor
Charlotte: A Tale of Two Cities
Corridor ComparisonsProficiency Rates
School 2010-11
West Charlotte CorridorAllenbrook Elementary 59Bruns Academy 55Druid Hills Academy 55Thomasboro Academy 52Statesville Road Elementary 57Walter G. Byers School 38Ranson Middle School 62West Charlotte High School 68
South Charlotte CorridorProvidence Springs Elementary School
98
South Charlotte Middle School 94Providence High School 96
The achievement gap that separates thousands of our minority and low‐income students from their peers in Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools is unacceptable.
Innovative Solutions to Educational Issues
• Private sector interested in equity & reducing achievement gaps– Significant investments over the years from private
philanthropy– Geoffrey Canada discusses “zone” concept for
Charlotte (early 2010)– Levine and Spangler families begin dialogue– Superintendent is approached by both families– Potential funding opportunities are tossed around
• Levine & Spangler families approach other donors
• Additional foundations express interest• FFTC assists with process & funding evaluation
CMS Investment Study Group
Peter Gorman & Ann Clark
Community Engagement
• Six Study Group meetings– Examined current CMS data and
initiatives– Met with national consulting
organizations & experts– Reviewed local & national models– Large amounts of outside reading
material• Community engagement
activities– 5 community meetings with over
650 attendees– Included parents, grandparents,
business leaders, faith, youth, etc.– Free viewing of “Waiting for
Superman” facilitated by Mayor Foxx• All supported key early decision:
Narrow focus to a defined zone
Two Part Charge
• Develop a replicable model for closing the achievement gap and increasing graduation rates in CMS Schools
• Secure sufficient philanthropic resources to implement the model
Common themes emerged for the initiative: At the broad level
• Be bold and “out of the box”• But, geographically focused, replicable
and sustainable• Ensure impact and measurable outcomes• Think holistically about the needs in the
area• Coordinate with others where possible• Sense of urgency
Building Blocks
Policy Reform
Success requires leveraged collaborations
The return on investment and collective impact leveraging philanthropic dollars and coordinating partners on a common agenda will be much greater than that of any isolated intervention or investment.
Project LIFT Launch:
• August 1 Executive Director Hired– In collaboration with stakeholders, devise a
strategic plan.– Be innovative; resist the status quo– Use best practices from national turnaround
efforts and research– Communicate and coordinate– Leverage Resources– Support Fundraising
Work Plan Development
• Initial Priorities-Rejuvenate interest and excitement-Introduction and acknowledgement of funders-Engage the L.I.F.T. Board one on one-Outreach to key stakeholders-Assess Needs and Get Input
Work Plan Development
•Develop Theory of Action–Examining underlying issues–Investigating similar initiatives: Success & failure–Determining return on investment
•Articulate strategies•Prioritize strategies Years 2-5•Determine how to operationalize the strategy•Strategic Plan to be completed in December
Timeline: August-December 2011
Work Plan Development
•Engage/ endorse partners •Selection based on proven results•Begin implementation•Ensure coordination/collaboration on common goals
• -Training• -Communication• -Establish collective measurable goals
– Full launch: July 1
Timeline: January 2012-June 2012
Early Progress and Traction
• Policy Update• Meeting with Governor Perdue
– Proposals for policy reform– General endorsement– Working with CMS to determine next steps– Project L.I.F.T. schools may serve as proof point
Early Progress and Traction
• Initial Grant: Communities In Schools-$950,000
-Provides Initial Momentum and Intervention-Largest, proven dropout prevention program-Will serve 1900 students in the 8 LIFT Schools
Early Progress and Traction
• Initial Grant: Schools-Stimulate school level implementation-Seed funding to school PTSAs ($2500)• Establish a PTSA• Encourage shared decision making
-Discretionary grant to principals ($5000)
Early Progress and Traction
•A July Visit to the White House
-Recognized for focused philanthropic efforts-Endorsed by Colin Powell’s America’s Promise as a national exemplar for philanthropy
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent
Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools
Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher
Presentation to Project L.I.F.T.October 7, 2011
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools
Project LIFT: Agenda
• Overview and Welcome• Geoffery Canada: Setting the Tone• Overview of Project LIFT• Defining the District/LIFT Partnership• Survey Results & Strategic Planning• Reaching Every Student with an Excellent Teacher• Processing/Planning/Input• Changing the Odds in the LIFT Zone• Communities In Schools