Using Combined Air Toxic Concentrations to Discern Patterns of School Absenteeism and Academic Performance Principal Investigators (PIs) Dr. Paul Mohai Dr. Byoung-Suk Kweon Post-doctoral Research Fellow Dr. Sangyun Lee April 13, 2011 School of Natural Resources & Environment University of Michigan Sponsor The Kresge Foundation
29
Embed
Principal Investigators (PIs) Dr. Paul Mohai Dr. Byoung-Suk Kweon Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Using Combined Air Toxic Concentrations to Discern Patterns of School Absenteeism and Academic Performance. Principal Investigators (PIs) Dr. Paul Mohai Dr. Byoung-Suk Kweon Post-doctoral Research Fellow Dr. Sangyun Lee. April 13, 2011 School of Natural Resources & Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Using Combined Air Toxic Concentrations to Discern Patterns of School
Absenteeism and Academic Performance
Principal Investigators (PIs)Dr. Paul Mohai
Dr. Byoung-Suk Kweon
Post-doctoral Research FellowDr. Sangyun Lee
April 13, 2011
School of Natural Resources & EnvironmentUniversity of Michigan
Sponsor The Kresge Foundation
Locations of 3660 public schools in the State of Michigan in 2007
2
Total Air Toxic Concentrations from Industrial Sources (RSEI-GM) in the State of Michigan
(Total of All Chemicals in 2006)
3
Total Air Toxic Concentrations from Industrial Sources (RSEI-GM) in the State of Michigan
(Total of All Chemicals in the Top 10 Percentile)
4
2006 Toxic Concentration Contours in Michigan(For Manganese)
About 30% of cells have zero toxic concentration
5
2006 Toxic Concentration Contours in Michigan(For Manganese and Top 10 Percentile)
6
2006 Toxic Concentration Contours in Michigan(For Lead)
7
2006 Toxic Concentration Contours in Michigan(For Lead and Top 10 Percentile)
8
Estimating toxic air concentrations from industrial sources (RSEI-GM) within 2 km of schools
using areal apportionment
Estimating toxic air concentrations from industrial sources (RSEI-GM) within 2 km of schools
using areal apportionment
Mean air toxic concentration within 2 km circle of the school =
∑ %CGi * TCi
%CGi = Percent of area of the 2 km circle captured by grid celliTCi = Total toxic concentration in grid celli
n
i=1
9
Data obtained from Scorecard: http://www.scorecard.org.
Top 12 chemicals in areas within 2 km of schoolsand identified adverse health effects
Deciles of toxic air concentrations (TC) by land area in Michigan and school-based demographics
Deciles of toxic air concentrations (TC) by land area in Michigan and school-based demographics
Based on 2006 RSEI-GM
Percent of Students Not Meeting MEAP Standards by Quintiles of Total Air Toxic Concentrations
Percent of Students Not Meeting MEAP Standards by Quintiles of Total Air Toxic Concentrations
12
MEAP scores are for 2007. Total air toxic concentrations are for 2006. Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards are based on averages across all schools in Michigan.
English
Math
Toxicity Quintiles 1st
Toxicity Quintiles 1st
Regression analysis of percent of students not meeting English MEAP standards by quintiles of total air toxic
Regression analysis of percent of students not meeting math MEAP standards by quintiles of total air toxic concentrations
14* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001•Grades 3rd to 8th combined
Math (N=2633)Model 1 Model 2
Beta Sig Beta Sig
1st Quintile
2nd Quintile 0.025 -0.026
3rd Quintile -0.005 -0.029
4th Quintile 0.149*** 0.022
5th Quintile 0.361*** 0.051*
Rural
Central cities 0.025
suburbs 0.097***
Attendance rates -0.113***
Expenditure per pupil -0.004
#Students (100) 0.130***
Student/Teacher Ratio 0.053***
%Free lunch students 0.566***
R2 0.120*** 0.478***
Regression analysis of school attendance rates by quintiles of total air toxic concentrations
N=3417Model 1 Model 2
Beta Sig Beta Sig
1st Quintile -- -- -- --
2nd Quintile -0.021 -0.012
3rd Quintile -0.028 -0.042 ***
4th Quintile -0.099 *** -0.080 ***
5th Quintile -0.243 *** -0.129 ***
Rural -- --
Central cities -0.086 ***
Suburbs 0.066 **
Expenditure per pupil 0.042 **
#Students (100) 0.026
Student/Teacher Ratio -0.113 ***
%Free lunch students -0.249 ***
R2 0.049 *** 0.167 ***
* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001
Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards by quintiles of manganese concentrations
Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards by quintiles of manganese concentrations
18
MEAP scores are for 2007. Concentrations of manganese are for 2006 RSEI. Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards are based on averages across all schools in Michigan.
English
Math
Toxicity Quintiles 1st
Toxicity Quintiles 1st
Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards by quintiles of lead concentrations
Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards by quintiles of lead concentrations
19
MEAP scores are for 2007. Concentrations of lead are for 2006 RSEI. Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards are based on averages across all schools in Michigan.
English
Math
Toxicity Quintiles 1st
Toxicity Quintiles 1st
Regression analysis of % of students not meeting English MEAP standards by manganese and lead concentrations
20
English (N=2633)Model 1 Model 2
Beta Sig Beta SigLow lead-low mang. -- -- Low lead-med. mang. -0.027 0.006 Low lead-high mang. -0.043* 0.003 Med. lead-low mang. -0.012 0.008 Med. lead-med. mang. 0.046* 0.040*Med. lead-high mang. 0.083*** 0.043** High lead-low mang. -0.024 -0.014 High lead-med. mang. 0.056** -0.004 High lead-high mang. 0.381*** 0.052** Rural -- Central cities 0.087***suburbs 0.063** Attendance rates -0.103***Expenditure per pupil -0.011 #Students (100) 0.071***Student/Teacher Ratio 0.030*%Free lunch students 0.672***R2 0.142*** 0.571***
* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001•Grades 3rd to 8th combined
Regression analysis of % of students not meeting Math MEAP standards by manganese and lead concentrations
21
Math (N=2633)Model 1 Model 2
Beta Sig Beta SigLow lead-low mang. -- -- Low lead-med. mang. -0.029 -0.002 Low lead-high mang. -0.041* -0.003 Med. lead-low mang. -0.009 0.008 Med. lead-med. mang. 0.039 0.031 Med. lead-high mang. 0.078*** 0.040* High lead-low mang. -0.022 -0.012 High lead-med. mang. 0.053* -0.010 High lead-high mang. 0.355*** 0.053** Rural -- Central cities 0.081***suburbs 0.015 Attendance rates -0.119***Expenditure per pupil -0.005 #Students (100) 0.133***Student/Teacher Ratio 0.052***%Free lunch students 0.577***R2 0.125*** 0.477***
* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001•Grades 3rd to 8th combined
Respiratory risk contours in the state of Michigan (2005 National Air Toxics Assessment)
Contours based on accumulated area (in square kilometers) of census tracts in ascending order of respiratory risk ratio from 2005 NATA
22
Respiratory risk contours of the 10th decile in the state of Michigan (2005 National Air Toxics Assessment)
Contours based on accumulated area (in square kilometers) of census tracts in ascending order of respiratory risk ratio from 2005 NATA
23
Estimating respiratory risk ratios (NATA) within 2 km of schools using areal apportionment
Estimating respiratory risk ratios (NATA) within 2 km of schools using areal apportionment
Mean respiratory risk ratio within 2 km circle of the school =
∑ %CTi * RRRi
%CTi = Percent of the area of the circle captured tracti
Deciles of respiratory risk ratio in Michigan and school-based demographics
Deciles of respiratory risk ratio in Michigan and school-based demographics
Respiratory risk ratios are based on 2005 National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) and includes major, area, on-road mobile, non-road mobile, and background sources
Percent of Students Not Meeting MEAP Standards by Quintiles of Respiratory Risks
Percent of Students Not Meeting MEAP Standards by Quintiles of Respiratory Risks
26
MEAP scores are for 2007. Respiratory risks are for 2005. Percent of students not meeting MEAP standards are based on averages across all schools in Michigan.
Regression analysis of percent of students not meeting English MEAP standards by quintiles of total respiratory risk
27* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001•Grades 3rd to 8th combined
English (N=2633)Model 1 Model 2
Beta Sig Beta Sig
1st Quintile -- --
2nd Quintile -0.093*** -0.028
3rd Quintile -0.004 -0.017
4th Quintile 0.065** 0.003
5th Quintile 0.379*** 0.105***
Rural --
Central cities 0.059*
suburbs 0.104***
Attendance rates -0.086***
Expenditure per pupil -0.021
#Students (100) 0.061***
Student/Teacher Ratio 0.028*
%Free lunch students 0.636***
R2 0.165*** 0.587***
Regression analysis of percent of students not meeting math MEAP standards by quintiles of total respiratory risk
28
* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001
•Grades 3rd to 8th combined
Math (N=2633)Model 1 Model 2
Beta Sig Beta Sig
1st Quintile -- --
2nd Quintile -0.088*** -0.042
3rd Quintile -0.008 -0.044
4th Quintile 0.048* -0.034
5th Quintile 0.345*** 0.073**
Rural --
Central cities 0.033
suburbs 0.120***
Attendance rates -0.102***
Expenditure per pupil -0.011
#Students (100) 0.127***
Student/Teacher Ratio 0.052***
%Free lunch students 0.547***
R2 0.138*** 0.483***
Regression analysis of school attendance rates by quintiles of total respiratory risks