Primary experimental results of suppressing MHD instabilities in HT-7 by biased electrode Zhong Fangchuan, Luo Jiarong Shu Shuangbao College of Science, Donghua University Shanghai, 201620 HT-7 Data Meeting and Workshop, July 19-20
Dec 16, 2015
Primary experimental results of suppressing MHD instabilities in HT-7 by
biased electrode
Zhong Fangchuan, Luo Jiarong Shu Shuangbao
College of Science, Donghua UniversityShanghai, 201620
HT-7 Data Meeting and Workshop, July 19-20
Introduction
Experimental Setup
Results MHD instabilities
Plasma rotation
Profile
Conclusion
Outline
Introduction
MHD instabilities is one of the main obstacles to realize the tokamak advance operation with high parameters.
MHD instabilities suppression and control is a basic and important topic of tokamak plasma research.
It has been proved that plasma rotation and
shear flow is benefit for MHD stabilities.
Locked mode and disruption
Introduction
A
crit
V
Device DIII-D JET JT-60U NSTX
12% 0 . 61% 1% 46%
Minimum ration of plasma toroidal rotation to Alfven speed to keep the RWM stable in Tokamaks
Introduction
How to maintain or increase the plasma rotation?
NBI(most used one) RF Wave Biased Electrode
BvBvPen
E iri
r 1
Change Er Vary V 、 V .
Introduction
By using a biased electrode to add an externa
l electrical field on plasma. Through EB drif
t, the plasma edge rotation will be changed, an
d the MHD instabilities will be reduced.
Introduction
Device name
Coutry R/a(cm)
Bt(T) IP(kA) Ne(/m3) Te(eV)
SINP India 30/7.5 0.45 10-30 1-31019 ? KT-5 China 32.5/8.5 0.5 10 1.0 1019 20
CASTOR Czech 40/8.5 1 15 1-21019 ? ISTTOK Portugal 46/8.5 0.6 8 71018 260
TCABR Brazil 61/18 1.1 110 1-41019 600
TdeV Canada 87/27 1.5 210 ? ?Phased-T USA 93/26 0.7-1.0 70-100 1.0 1019 400
CCT USA 150/40 0.3 50 21018 150
T-10 Russia 150/33 2.5 200-300
1-41019 ?
TEXTOR Germany 175/46 2.35 190 1-21019 1000-1500
Tokamaks which have conducted the biased electrode experiments
Device name
Biased polarity
Electrode size ( mm)
Distance to limiter (mm)
Bias voltage/cuurent
SINP negative 6 10 -20 300V/100A
KT-5 positive 30 4 10 150V/200A
CASTOR positive 50 >0 200V/40A
ISTTOK, bipolar 3 125 0 300V/400A
TCABR, positive 20 5 -20 600V/150A
TdeV( multi divertor 0 300V/100A
Phased-T positive 25 30 -30 500V/300A
CCT negative ? ? 1000V/40A
T-10 positive 154555 -20 450V/80-200A
TEXTOR bipolar 130 35 15
-60 900 V/100A
( 1 ) Improve confinement ( LH)
Biased experiment in TEXTOR
* R.R. WEYNANTS, et. al, NUCLEAR FUSION, Vo1.32, NOS (1992)
* E.Y. WANG*, Xin WANG, D.A. DIEBOLD,et al, NUCLEAR FUSION, Vol. 35. No.4
BIASED H MODE EXPERIMENTS IN PHAEDRUS-T
Only Positive Biased trigger the LH Same results in T-10
In N biased, Ion current is too small to trigger LH ?
Biased experiment in ISSTK
Negative biased improve the confinement.Positive biased degrade the confinement.
* J A C Cabraly, et. Al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 40 (1998) 1001–1019
Which is critical, Polarization ?Current ?
(2)Change rotation
Biased experiment in KT-5
Current injection Plasma biasing Hybrid biasing
Biased experiment in Tdev
Rotation experiment in HBT-EP ( 2009 APS meeting)
(3)Effect on MHD
I.C. Nascimento et. al, Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) 1570–1576
Suppression and excitation of MHD activity at TCABR
Biased Electrode can
(1 ) Improve confinement ( LH)
(2) Change the plasma rotation
(3) Suppress or stimulate the MHD
instabilities
Introduction
But the action mechanism is still not clear.
Retractable electrode
Bias Power
plasma
Voltage 0 ~ 650V,
Current 0 ~ 300A
Experimental Setup
Experimental Setup
Three type of electrodes
Movable limiter 15050 40
Mushroom shape 60
Movable poloidal limiter 56010010
Results Effect on MHD
Typical time evolution of discharge with/without biased(Signals from top to bottom are : plasma current IP, line integrated density ne, SX-ray emision, H, Mirnov and biased current)
0 20000 40000 600000
30
60
90
120
Am
p. (
a.u
.)
Frequency (Hz)
113684 w/O biased 113692 with biased
Effect on MHD
It is a time delay for the MHD is suppressed and burst out again after the biased voltage on and off
~25ms
Time delay for the effect on
~60ms
Time delay for the effect decay away after bias voltage is off
Suppression effect depend on biased current .
Mushroom electrode
Suppression effect depend on biased current .
Small limiter
Suppression effect depend on biased current . Large limiter
Electrode typesurface area
(cm2)
Minimum action curre
nt(A)
current density(A/cm2 )
mushroon 28.27431 14 0.49514913
small limiter 150 45 0.3
large limimter 622.03482 80 0.128610164
Minimum biased current density for the MHD suppression for different electrode
MHD suppression effect is strongly depended on the biased current, there is a minimum biased current need for the action !!!
Results Effect on rotation
The effect on toroidal rotation M=ln(Is+/Is-)/K
-4
-2
0
2
4
Mir
no
ve
shot 13692
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
Ma
ch
nu
mb
er
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
0
70
140
Bia
se
d c
urr
en
t
Time ( s)
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.20.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2M
ach
Nu
mb
er
Time (s))
0A 80A 100A 110A 140A 160A 185A
Biasing on
Effect of biasing current on toroidal rotation
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.20.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2M
ach
Nu
mb
er
time (s)
275 Ibiase=0 275 Ibias=70A 278 Ibias=70A 281 Ibias=70A
Biasing on
Toroidal rotation behavior in different radius
The phase difference from two floating potential signals measured by Langmuir probes nearby along the poloidal field line can be used to calculate the poloidal rotation speed*.
Poloidal field line
Z
Suppose the cross phase of two probes signals is (t), then:
tt )(Where t is wave travel time between two position,
)(/ tVzt
*Rev Sci. Instru. Vol 70(1) , 874,1999
So V(t) can be calculated
Effect on poloidal rotation
Effect on ploidal rotation
When biasing, the phase difference is decrease, imply the poloidal rotation is increased
Shot 112252Shot 112254
0.30 0.45 0.60 0.750.0
5.0x103
1.0x104
1.5x104
2.0x104
2.5x104
3.0x1040.30 0.45 0.60 0.75
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
V
(m/s
)
Time(s)
shot 113252 w/o biasing shot 113254 with biasing biasing current
Time evolution of poloidal rotation with/without biasing
0.30 0.45 0.60 0.750.0
5.0x103
1.0x104
1.5x104
2.0x104
2.5x104
3.0x104
V(
m/s
)
Time (s)
275w/o Biasing 273 Ibias=70A 275 Ibias=70A 280 Ibias=70A
Biasing on
Poloidal rotation in different radius
Effect on profile
-20 -10 0 10 200
20
40
60S
X E
mis
sion
(a.
u.)
r (cm)
520 560 600 620 640 680 700 720 740 760 780
Time evolution of SX emission profile
-20 -10 0 10 200.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0S
X E
mis
sion
(a.
u.)
r (cm)
520 ms 600 680 700 720 740 760 780
Time evolution of normalzied SX emission profile
Conclusion
Biasing electrode can suppress MHD instabilities effectively.
Suppression effect is strong depended on the biased current
Edge plasma rotation is increased greatly by biasing voltage
Plasma profile is changed by biasing electrode.
Further study is need.
Acknowledgements
The supports and helps from ASIPP are great appreciated.
Great thank Dr. Zhao Hailin and Dr. Kong Defeng from USTC for provide the Langmuir probe data.
The research is supported by Ministry of Science and Technology with grant No. 2008CB717807 and 2009GB107006.
Thank you for your attention