Page 1
Price Discovery in the U.S. Stock Options Market∗
YUSIF E. SIMAAN †
Graduate School of Business, Fordham University
L IUREN WU‡
Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College
This version: December 16, 2003
First draft: March 1, 2002
∗We thank Automated Trading Desk, LLC for providing data and computing assistance. We thank Robert Battalio, Joel Has-
brouck, Charles Jones, Maureen O’Hara, Martin Resch, Dan Weaver, David Whitcomb, and seminar participants at the 2003
Western Finance Association and the 2003 European Finance Associationfor insightful comments. We also thank Eric Crampton
for help on the data preprocessing, and Sandra Size Moore for copy editing. Part of the results in this paper were circulated in an
earlier draft titled “Price Discovery in the Equity Options Market: An Integrated Analysis of Trades and Quotes.”†113 West 60th Street, New York, NY 10023; tel: (212) 636-6116; fax:(212) 765-5573;[email protected] .‡One Bernard Baruch Way, Box B10-225, New York, NY 10010; tel: (646) 312-3509; fax: (646) 312-3451;
Liuren [email protected] ; http://faculty.baruch.cuny.edu/lwu/.
1
Page 2
Price Discovery in the U.S. Stock Options Market
ABSTRACT
Five U.S. exchanges compete to provide quotes and attract order flows on a common set of stock
options: the American Stock Exchange, the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, the International Se-
curities Exchange, the Pacific Stock Exchange, and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange. In this paper,
we investigate the price discovery in the U.S. stock optionsmarket. Our analysis shows that the newly
founded, fully electronic International Securities Exchange has become the leader in providing options
quotes that are the most informative, the most binding, and also the most executable.
Page 3
Price Discovery in the U.S. Stock Options Market
The financial industry has come to recognize the importance of derivativesecurities in providing unique in-
vestment opportunities and risk-management vehicles. Trading volume on derivatives has increased tremen-
dously during the past few years. Accompanying this expansion in derivatives have been rapid expansions
and transformations in the options market. In the United States, in an effort to reduce trade-throughs and
other market segmentations, a series of regulatory changes have taken place since the late 1990s. Currently,
five options exchanges compete to provide quotes and attract order flowson a common set of stock op-
tions: the American Stock Exchange, the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, the International Securities
Exchange, the Pacific Stock Exchange, and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange.
Compared to the vast empirical market microstructure literature on the stock market, there has been
little research on the market microstructure, and price discovery in particular, of the options market. In this
paper, we investigate the price discovery process on the most actively traded options that are listed on all
five U.S. stock options exchanges. Based on the real-time feeds from the Options Price Reporting Authority
(OPRA) during January of 2002, we filter out both the quotes and tradeson the 50 most actively traded
stock options. We measure the Hasbrouck (1995) information share by using the second-by-second quote
book, and we analyze the link between price discovery and other market conditions. We also investigate the
general statistical properties of the bids and asks from each exchangeand analyze how they match with the
transactions.
Our analysis shows that the newly founded, fully electronic exchange, the ISE, has become the leader
in providing the most informative quotes. Comparing the information-share estimates with the trading
activities of each option contract shows that ISE’s leadership in price discovery is more pronounced when it
has a larger market share in the options contract and when the options contract has higher aggregate trading
activity.
We also find that the quotes from the ISE have the narrowest mean bid-askspread and represent the
national best bid or offer (NBBO) for most of time. In contrast, the other four traditional exchanges rarely
provide quotes that are at the NBBO alone. Furthermore, by comparing theoptions transaction price to the
quotes at different exchanges, we find that transactions on the ISE occur exactly at the bid or offer for 84.48
1
Page 4
percent of the time, the highest among all five options exchanges. This observation shows that quotes from
the ISE are not only the most binding, but also the most executable.
The ISE leads in both price discovery and in providing the tightest and the most executable quotes.
The differences among the quotes from the other four traditional options exchanges are much smaller. The
relative ranking of the four traditional exchanges also differs when weexamine them by different measures.
The modified outcry systems on the CBOE and the PCX are better than the specialist systems on the AMEX
and the PHLX in providing more informative quotes. On the other hand, the average bid-ask spreads on the
AMEX and the CBOE are narrower than those on the PHLX and the PCX. We also find that quotes on the
PCX have the widest spread and are noncompetitive most of the time, but trades on the PCX are executed
inside its posted spread for over 70 percent of the time.
The microstructural design at the ISE differs from that at the traditional exchanges in several important
ways. On the traditional floor-based option exchanges, only one marketmaker drives the quotes for each
option contract, and the identity of this market maker is known to the public. This market maker is referred
to as a specialist at the AMEX and PHLX, a designated primary market maker (DPM) at the CBOE, and a
lead market maker (LMM) at the PCX. In contrast, on the ISE, 11 market makers, including one primary
market maker (PMM) and ten competitive market makers (CMMs), send in quotes electronically via their
respective terminals to a central quote-consolidating system. The market observes a consolidated quote
book from these 11 market makers. The identity of the specific market makerthat underlies each quote is
not known to the public.
Our empirical analysis shows that the microstructural design at the ISE leads to better quotes in terms
of price discovery, average spreads, and executability. Over time, the high-quality quotes at the ISE have
also attracted order flows. The ISE became the third largest options exchange in the United States in trading
volume 18 months after its launch. By mid 2003, the market share of the ISE hadbecome the largest in
options trading volume, excluding the S&P index options, which are solely licensed to the CBOE.
We believe that our paper is the first study to address the price discoveryissue among different options
exchanges. The few known empirical microstructure studies on the optionsmarket include Battalio, Hatch,
and Jennings (2003); Chakravarty, Gulen, and Mayhew (2003); deFountnouvelle, Fishe, and Harris (2003);
2
Page 5
Mayhew (2002); Neal (1987, 1992); and Wang (2000). None of these studies directly address the issue of
price discovery among different options exchanges.
Battalio, Hatch, and Jennings (2003) use a data sample that is similar to ours, and investigate whether
the options market approaches that of a national market system. They findthat compared to the options
market in June 2000, the market much more closely resembles a national market during our sample period
in January 2002. Chakravarty, Gulen, and Mayhew (2003) analyze the price discovery between the stock
market and the stock options market. Their analysis is based on an old sample (1988-1992) and option quotes
from a single options exchange (the CBOE). The landscape of the optionsmarket has changed dramatically
since then. Since 1999, many option classes list on several exchanges (de Fountnouvelle, Fishe, and Harris
(2003)). The options quotes are now legally required to be firm. Most important of all, the new exchange,
the ISE, has become the leader over the traditional exchanges in providingthe most informative quotes.
In this paper, Section 1 provides some background information on the unique characteristics of the op-
tions market making. We also discuss the recent development in the U.S. options market, the microstructure
design of the new options exchange, the ISE, and its key structural differences from the four traditional
options exchanges. Section 2 describes the data source and the criteria for our sample selection. Section 3
describes the econometrics underlying our price discovery analysis. Section 4 discusses the results on the
price discovery in the options market. Section 5 provides further analysis of the trades and quotes on the
five options exchanges. Section 6 concludes.
1. The Market Microstructure of the Options Exchanges
Option prices provide information about the underlying security that is not readily available from the primary
security market. The price quote of a stock represents a mean valuation of the stock, but the prices of options
underlying this stock at the whole spectrum of strike prices and maturities present a complete picture on
the conditional distribution of the stock value at different possible realizations and conditioning horizons.
Therefore, it is important to understand the information flow in the options market.
Market making in the options market has its own unique characteristics. An important characteristics
of the options markets is the different risk profiles faced by the market makers. In the options market,
3
Page 6
underlying one stock are hundreds of options at different strike prices and maturities. The values of these
options are inherently linked by many no-arbitrage relations. When a marketmaker adjusts her quote on
one option contract, she should also consider the quotes on other options underlying the same stock, so that
she will not be locked in an arbitrage trading program.
The options market maker must also pay constant attention to the underlying stock market. Any stock
quote update necessitates the updates of hundreds of options underlyingthis stock. For example, an informed
trader who knows that a stock price will go up soon can buy the stock up to the ask size of the stock market
maker. On the options market, this informed trader can simultaneously buy all thecalls and sell all the puts
underlying this stock. Therefore, if we think of the risk exposure of the stock market maker as her current
ask size, then the risk exposure of the options market maker is the summation ofher ask sizes on all call
options and her bid sizes on all put options underlying this stock.
The unique characteristics of the options market dictate that the options market maker needs to have not
only the intricate knowledge of many different no-arbitrage relations, butalso the technology to update her
quotes rapidly across all options underlying the same stock as each stock quote updates. Furthermore, the
increased risk exposure due to the highly correlated moves among all options underlying the same stock also
necessitates the options exchanges to create a market microstructure to protect themselves.
1.1. The recent development of the options market
In July 2000, to reduce trade-throughs and other market segmentations,the Securities and Exchange Com-
mission (SEC) approved a plan to electronically link the various market centers.1 The SEC has also adopted
more stringent quoting and disclosure rules on the options market.
Another important development in the options market was the launch of a new exchange, the ISE. The
ISE started its first day of option trading on May 26th, 2000. By November 2001, the ISE had grown to
become the third-largest U.S. options exchange, trailing only the CBOE and the AMEX among the nation’s
1See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43086 (July 28, 2000), 65 FR 48023 (August 4, 2000) (“Linkage Plan”).
4
Page 7
five options exchanges.2 The traditional exchanges are facing significant pressure to either modify their
exchange structures to be more in line with the market trend, or face the risk of being forced out of the
competition. Thus, the need for microstructure research on the options market is more important and urgent
than ever.
1.2. The microstructure of the options exchanges
The four floor-based legacy exchanges provide market making for equity options under two slightly different
structures. The AMEX and the PHLX apply a specialist structure resemblingthat used in stock markets. The
CBOE trades options under a “Designated Primary Market Maker” (DPM), a modification of the original
open outcry structure used in the futures pit. The PCX also follows a similar modified outcry structure, and
trades options under a “Lead Market Maker” (LMM). The responsibilities of the DPM or LMM include
disseminating quotes, providing liquidity to thin markets by trading on his own account, and representing
public limit orders. The roles are similar to those of a specialist. The difference is that options traded under
a DPM may also be traded by other market makers. However, the DPM maintainsthe right to a certain
percentage of the public order flow (Mayhew (2002)).
In contrast to the four traditional exchanges, market making on the ISE is fully electronic and does
not have a floor. Market makers send in their quotes via their quoting engines. These quotes are then
consolidated via a centralized consolidating system. Both ISE’s central exchange system and trading stations
are provided by OM, part of the Swedish OM Group. APIs (Application Programmers Interface) on a
variety of platforms are provided to allow broker/dealers to link their order delivery systems to ISE’s order
management system. In this way, orders from participating broker/dealerscan be routed, executed, and
reported all electronically with no paper.
The ISE combines auction market principles with electronic trading. The ISE isnot an electronic com-
munications network (ECN) or alternative trading system (ATS), but an SEC-registered exchange. The ISE
has three classifications of members, all of whom are registered broker/dealers. They include ten Primary
Market Makers (PMMs), one hundred Competitive Market Makers (CMMs), and an unlimited number of
2The market share is reported in a news release from the ISE, based ontotal volume transacted in all listed options, equity as
well as index products, traded during the month of October, 2001.
5
Page 8
broker/dealers functioning as Electronic Access Members (EAMs). In the ISE system, floor brokers are not
needed, since orders are input by broker/dealers directly to the point-of-sale (electronic order book).
PMMs are market makers with significant market-making responsibilities, including overseeing the
opening, providing continuous quotations in all of their assigned stock options, and ensuring that customer
orders are not automatically executed at prices inferior to those available at other options exchanges. Op-
tions traded on the ISE are divided into ten groups (“bins”), with one PMM assigned to each bin. PMMs
may also conduct a limited amount of trading (up to ten percent of their quarterly contract volume) in other
options traded on the ISE. A PMM must purchase or lease a PMM membership.PMMs are not permitted to
represent agency orders.
CMMs are market makers who quote independently and add depth and liquidityto the market. Each
CMM is required to provide continuous quotations in no less than 60 percent of the stock options in their
assigned group. There are up to ten CMMs appointed to each bin of options. CMMs may also conduct a
limited amount of trading (up to 25 percent of their quarterly contract volume)in other options traded on
the ISE. Like a PMM, a CMM must purchase or lease a CMM membership. Also,CMMs are not permitted
to represent agency orders.
EAMs are broker/dealers that represent agency and/or proprietaryorders on the exchange. An EAM
does not purchase a membership. Rather, once approved as an ISE member, an EAM pays an access fee that
permits the firm to place orders in all of the options traded on the exchange. EAMs cannot enter quotations
or otherwise engage in market making on the exchange.
An organization may obtain more than one membership. It is possible to be a PMM inone group of op-
tions, obtain several CMM memberships to provide markets in other groups, and have an EAM membership
to enter agency and proprietary orders in all groups. Firms that are bothmarket makers and EAMs must
conduct those activities separately. A member may not be both a PMM and CMMin the same group of
options.
The quotes and trades on the ISE proceed as follows: One PMM and ten CMMs provide quotes through
their own electronic quote engine on each options contract. These quotes are sent electronically to a central
quote consolidating machine provided by OM. The quote-consolidating machine generates a quote book
6
Page 9
(bid, bid size, ask, ask size) that represents the best bid and ask fromthe 11 market makers. The market
(public) has access to the consolidated quote book, but not the market maker’s identity underlying each
quote.
On the other side, the unlimited number of EAMs enter their orders through theirelectronic terminals.
These orders are consolidated to generate an order book. Finally, the order book and the quote book meet in
the trading engine, also provided by OM, to generate transactions. The flow chart in Figure 1 summarizes
the quote and trade procedures at the ISE.
1.3. Key structural differences between the options exchanges
The key difference between the ISE and the four traditional exchangesis the number of market makers
who can drive quotes. On the ISE, 11 market makers can send in two-sided quotes into each option class.
On the traditional exchanges, only one market maker can drive quotes. As a result, on the four traditional
exchanges, one market maker must be on both sides of the market, bid and offer, but on the ISE it is normal
for the bid to be from one market maker and the offer from another marketmaker. For some actively traded
options, the firms that are the specialists (LMMs, DPMs) on the traditional exchanges are often also CMMs
on the ISE. Most of the time, these specialists provide the same quote to both exchanges. Therefore, for
these options, the traditional exchanges will almost never be the best quoteby itself.
Another difference between these exchanges is the anonymity of the market makers who send the quote.
On the traditional exchanges, it is public information on which firm is the specialist that provides the quotes.
But on the ISE, the quotes can come from any of the 11 firms. The identity of the market maker underlying
each quote on the consolidated quote book is essentially anonymous. Simaan,Weaver, and Whitcomb
(2003) find that market makers often quote more aggressively under anonymity.
The methods that can be used to drive quotes on the five exchanges are also different. The specialists at
the AMEX and PHLX can only enter quotes through their respective exchange’s trading system. The PCX
and the CBOE allow the firms to drive quotes two ways, either through the exchange’s trading system or
remotely through the firm’s own quote engine. In contrast, the ISE does nothave a floor. Market makers
enter quotes only through their quote engine. Without a floor and floor brokers, transactions at the ISE are all
7
Page 10
executed and reported electronically via user terminals. Orders from participating broker/dealers are routed,
executed, and reported electronically with a turnaround time of under one second. Such an automated system
can reduce the lags between trades and reports. It also provides quotes that are firmer and more reliable. In
essence, unless there are unusual conditions, any posted quotes arefirm and can be executed on until the
next update.
2. Data Source and Sample Selection
We extract the quotes and trades data on stock options from the electronic message feeds of S&P ComStock
XpressFeed. The feeds contain updates on both quotes and transactions, including both the quote or trade
prices and sizes.
The options data provider is the Options Price Reporting Authority. OPRA communicates to the public
all of the transactions and quotations from each options exchange through the facilities of its processor,
the Securities Industry Automation Corporation (SIAC). Each transaction and quote update is reported to
OPRA as a “message.” The options markets generate such messages for asubstantial number of products.
Currently, there are approximately 3,900 equity securities and indexes underlying listed option products,
and more than 178,000 individual option series. Trade and quote data aregenerated continuously for each
options product listed on each options exchange during the hours that markets are open.
Quote message traffic comprises most of the options message traffic. For example, in February 2000,
the average number of quotes per day was 37.5 million, while the average number of trades per day was
183,000.3 Quotes are usually generated automatically for individual options series based on changes in the
underlying stock price or index value: Every time a price changes for a particular equity security, the quotes
for all of the options on that security or an index in which that security is represented can be automatically
updated on each exchange that trade those options.
We select option contracts that are traded on all five exchanges and across all 20 business days in January
2002. During that month, 70,946 option contracts are traded on the five options exchanges. Five percent
3SEC Release No. 34-43621; release date: November 27, 2000.
8
Page 11
(3,397 contracts) of them are traded simultaneously in all five exchanges at least for one day. Of the 3,397
contracts, 835 of them are traded on all business days in January. Theother contracts are either not as active
or expire in the middle of January.
Trading activities vary significantly among these 835 options contracts. Themost actively traded option
in both trades and volume is CYQBD, a February 2002 (maturity) call option onCSCO with a strike price at
$20.00. The option has 3,608 trades (239,100 contracts) over the 20 days in January 2002, an average of 180
trades per day. The least active in number of trades is VMFAT, a January 2003 call option on Microsoft with
a strike price at $100.00. This option only trades 78 times (7,688 contracts) during January 2002, averaging
less than four trades a day. The least active in trading volume is EMCDV with only 120 trades and 709
contracts. It is an April 2002 call option on EMC with strike price at $12.50.
Although all the 835 options contracts are traded on all five exchanges, for 290 of these contracts one
exchange takes up more than half of the market share in number of trades.For our empirical analysis, we
focus on the contracts where no exchange has a market share higher than 50 percent. Then, we choose the
50 most active contracts in number of trades from among them.
The 50th contract, the least active, is CYQND, a February 2002 put option on CSCO with a strike
price of $20.00. This contract has 833 trades in January 2002, averaging about 42 trades per day. The quote
updates are sufficiently frequent to span the trading activities. For the selected 50 option contracts in January
2002, the median quote updating frequency is about seven seconds.
Table 1 reports the summary statistics of the 50 options contracts. Panel A reports the total number of
trades and the market share for each exchange in January 2002 for the 50 options. The number of trades
ranges from 833 for CYQND to 3,608 for CYQBD, with an average of 1,431 trades over 20 days. On
average, 20.8 percent of the trades occur on the AMEX, 29.6 percenton the CBOE, 16.2 percent on the ISE,
25.2 percent on the PCX, and 8.2 percent on the PHLX.
Panel B reports market shares based on the trading volume. Compared to the market share based on
number of trades, the market share based on trading volume increases for the AMEX and the ISE, but
decrease for the PCX. This difference in market share implies that on average, transactions on the AMEX
9
Page 12
and the ISE have a larger size than transactions on the PCX. As a result, thePCX reports more trades but
less volume.
3. Econometric Specifications
3.1. Data processing
We filter out the quotes and trades on the 50 active option contracts secondby second. We bundle trades that
happen at the same exchange at the same time (second) and transaction price. For the quote updates, if we
observe more than one quote update on a certain contract from a certain exchange within the same second,
we pick the last one in the sequence of the electronic message. Then, we expand the quote updates into a
second-by-second book. In this expanded book, quotes remain the same until the next update.
Using quotes from the five options exchanges, we also construct a series of national best bids and offers.
We define the national best bid as the maximum of the available bid quotes from the five options exchanges
and the national best ask as the minimum of the available ask quotes from the five options exchanges.
Therefore, for each options contract, we have six second-by-second series on the bid and six second-by-
second series on the ask. For each exchange, we also have a time-stamped series of transactions that include
both the transaction prices and transaction sizes.
3.2. Price discovery among the five options exchanges
When different exchanges provide competitive quotes on the same security, these quotes are cointegrated,
because all these quotes are noisy representations of the same fundamental value. Although each series
of bid or ask quotes may be nonstationary, the differences between the quotes from different exchanges
are stationary, representing temporary deviations from the long-run equilibrium relation. Engle and Granger
(1987) propose an vector error correction model (VECM) accommodating the cointegrating relation. Further
assuming that the fundamental value of the security price follows a random walk, Hasbrouck (1995) uses
this VECM specification to derive an information share measure that captures the percentage of the variance
10
Page 13
of the permanent component explained by each quote series.4 Here, we use this information share measure
to gauge the price discovery in the five options exchanges.
We use a price vectorpt = [p1t , p2t , · · · , pnt]⊤ to denote the quotes from different exchanges. We treat
bids and asks separately and usen = 5 to denote the five options exchanges. We assume that underlying all
these price quotes is a random walk component that represents the true value of the security, or the efficient
price. The difference between the quotes and the true value constitutes transient noise. Therefore, quotes
from each exchange are nonstationary, but quotes across exchanges are cointegrated. We write out the vector
error correction model of orderk as follows:
∆pt = A1∆pt−1 +A2∆pt−2 + · · ·+Ak∆pt−k + γ(zt−1−µz)+ut , (1)
where the coefficient matricesAi , i = 1,2, · · · ,k, are square matrices of ordern, ut denotes the innovation
vector with covariance matrixΩ, and(zt−1−µz) denotes the error correction term with
zt = [p1t − p2t , p1t − p3t , · · · , p1t − pnt]⊤ , (2)
andµz being the mean vector ofzt . The vector moving average representation of the model is
∆pt = B0ut +B1ut−1 +B2ut−2 + · · · , B0 = I . (3)
We calculate the moving average coefficientsB by forecasting the system subsequent to a unit perturbation.
Our primary interest is the cumulative impulse response function:
Ck =k
∑i=0
Bk. (4)
4Recent microstructure applications of the Hasbrouck information shareinclude Chakravarty, Gulen, and Mayhew (2003),
Hasbrouck (2003), and Huang (2002).
11
Page 14
The first columns of theCk matrix describe the prices subsequent to a shock in the first price, etc. Of
particular importance is the response to the permanent component by taking the limit,
C = limk→∞
Ck. (5)
The rows ofC are identical. If we usec to denote any row ofC, the variance of the common random walk
component of the quotes is
σ2w = cΩc⊤. (6)
If Ω is diagonal, we can define the information share of thei-th market as
ISi =c2
i Ω2ii
σ2w
. (7)
WhenΩ is not diagonal, the information share is not uniquely defined. We compute thelower and upper
bound of the information share by considering the Cholesky factorization of the all the rotations of the
disturbances.
We estimate the VECM model in equation (1) each day on the five ask series andthe five bid series
from each options contract separately. We specify a lag of ten minutes (600 seconds). To reduce the size
of the parameter set, we apply polynomial distributed lags (Greene, 1993) over lags 1-10 (seconds), 11-20,
and 21-30, and then apply moving averages on lags 31-60, 61-120, 121-300, and 301-600. To compute the
impact of the permanent component in (5), we letk = 10,800 (three hours). When we experiment with
different lags and different averages, the results are qualitatively similar.
4. Price Discovery in the Stock Options Market
We estimate the VECM model in equation (1) each day on each options contract.We estimate the model
using the five bid series and the five ask series separately. From the estimated model, we compare the lower
bound and upper bound estimates of the information share from each options exchange.
12
Page 15
4.1. Average information share
Table 2 reports the sample averages of the information-share estimates for the five option exchanges. Panels
A and B are lower (Min) and upper (Max) bound estimates on the bids and Panels C and D are the lower
and upper bound estimates on the asks. We obtain the average across 1,000 sample estimates from the 50
options contracts multiplied by the 20 business days in January 2002. In each panel, we report the maximum
(MAX), mean (MEAN), minimum (MIN), and standard deviation of the sample estimates.
Of the five options exchanges, the ISE has the largest average information share (bolded numbers),
regardless of whether the comparison is based on the lower or upper bounds of the information share, or
whether we estimate the model using bid or ask quotes.
Differences among the other four exchanges are much smaller. The average information share by bid
quotes shows the following ranking, from the highest to the lowest: ISE, CBOE, PCX, AMEX, and PHLX.
The ranking by the ask quotes is: ISE, PCX, CBOE, AMEX, and PHLX. The ranking of PCX and CBOE
is different depending on whether we measure the information share usingbids or asks. However, in either
case, the difference between the information-share estimates of these two exchanges is very small.
The average ranking separates the three major microstructure designs ofthe five exchanges. On top
of the ranking is the ISE. The second group includes the CBOE and the PCX. The least informative quotes
come from the specialist systems adopted at the AMEX and the PHLX. As discussed in Section 1, these three
groups have three different types of microstructure design for optionsmarket making. Our information-share
analysis shows that the design at the ISE leads to the most price discovery.
To determine the statistical significance of the leadership of the ISE over other exchanges in terms of
price discovery, we investigate the statistical properties of the information-share difference between the ISE
and the other four options exchanges.
L i ≡ ISISE− ISi , i = AMEX,CBOE,PCX,PHLX. (8)
We label the differenceL i as the leadership of the ISE over the options exchangei. A positive estimate for
the leadership measure indicates that the ISE leads the other exchange in providing more informative quotes.
13
Page 16
We construct at-statistic on the leadership over the four options exchanges based on the mean and standard
deviation estimates of the 1,000 samples,
t-statistici =AVERAGE(L i)
STDEV(L i)/√
N, (9)
whereN = 1000 denotes the number of sample points, AVERAGE denotes the sample average, and STDEV
denotes the sample standard deviation estimate. Table 3 reports thet-statistic estimates, which are all
strongly significant, regardless of whether we use the lower or upper bounds, bids or asks.
Thet-statistics also reveal another interesting feature of the options quotes. The statistics are larger for
asks than for the corresponding bids. The differentt-statistics imply that the price leadership of the ISE is
more significant in its ask quotes than in its bid quotes.
Also informative is the cumulative impulse response functions of the VECM model from different ex-
changes, as plotted in Figure 2. The left panels are based on estimates using the bid quotes and the right
panels are based on the ask quotes. These plots show the cumulative priceimpacts implied by an initial
unit shock to the quote in one exchange. For 50 option contracts over 20 business days, we have 1,000
estimates for each point in the response function. The lines in Figure 2 represent the sample averages of
these estimates.
By construction, att = 0, the impact is unity on one exchange and zero on others. The five figures
under each panel represent a unit initial shock on each of the five options exchanges. In the long run, the
impact for each initial shock is essentially identical for all exchanges. Thisconvergence is a consequence of
cointegration. However, the convergence speed and level differ fordifferent options exchanges. The most
obvious difference is between the behavior of the ISE and the behavior of the other four options exchanges.
For a unit initial shock to any other exchanges, the ISE always responds the fastest and converges to the
stationary state the earliest. On the other hand, when the unit shock is on the ISE, this unit shock has a larger
permanent impact on the market than all other cases.
The conclusions from bids and asks are approximately the same. The permanent impact of a unit shock
from the ISE is about 23 percent, and that from the other four exchanges is about 20 percent or less.
14
Page 17
Therefore, based on the estimated VECM model and Hasbrouck (1995)’s information-share measure,
we find that out of the five options exchanges, the newly launched ISE stands out in providing the most
informative quotes. The mean information-share estimate is the largest for theISE quotes. A unit shock
on the ISE quotes has a larger permanent impact on the market than a unit shock on any other options
exchanges. The difference among the four floor-based options exchanges is much smaller.
4.2. Information share and the market share
Although all the selected option contracts trade at all five exchanges, the relative activity across different
exchanges varies significantly. For example, when we measure the marketshare in number of trades, we
find that for CYQBD, the most active multiple-listed option contract, CBOE accounts for 43 percent of the
trading activity but PCX accounts for a meager 16 percent. In contrast, for QQQBN, the second most active
contract in our sample, CBOE only accounts for 12 percent of the tradingactivity but PCX accounts for 41
percent.
When the trading activities of a certain contract concentrate on one exchange, we expect that this ex-
change has more incentive to keep its quotes updated and lead in price discovery. From another perspective,
the trading of a certain contract might be concentrated at one exchange because that exchange provides
the most informative quotes. Both arguments imply a positive correlation between market share and price
leadership.
To investigate how the concentration of the trading activity of a certain optionscontract is related to
the price leadership of that contract, we compute the average price leadership of ISE over the other four
exchanges on that contract,
L =180
20
∑t=1
4
∑i=1
L t,i , i = AMEX,CBOE,PCX,PHLX. (10)
Then, we compute the correlation between this ISE average price leadership and the market share of ISE on
that contract, both by the number of trades and by the trading volume.
In Table 4, in the columns titled “Market Share of ISE,” we report the correlation estimates between
ISE’s price leadership as defined in equation (10) and its market share by both the number of trades and the
15
Page 18
trading volume. We observe positive correlations between ISE’s price leadership and its market share. The
positivity of the correlation estimate is robust whether we measure the information share by using the lower
or upper bounds, from the bids or asks, or whether we measure the market share by the number of trades or
trading volume. Therefore, ISE’s leadership in price discovery is more pronounced when the ISE possesses
a larger market share in trading activities.
Nevertheless, we must interpret our results with caution, because thet-statistics show that many of the
correlation estimates are not statistically significant. Thet-statistics are greater than two only when we
measure the market share of the ISE by trading volume and the information share by using the upper bounds
and the ask quotes. The lowt-statistics suggest that a positive correlation, if it exists, is a mild one.
To visually inspect the relation, we average ISE’s price leadership further across bids and asks, and lower
and upper bounds. Then, in Figure 3 we plot the ISE’s price leadershipon each option contract against ISE’s
market share in that contract. We observe a weak positive correlation between ISE’s market share and its
leadership in price discovery.
From the scatter plots, we also see that ISE’s average leadership in pricediscovery is positive for 45 of
the 50 option contracts. Only five of the contracts generate slightly negativeresults.
4.3. Information share and trading activity
The 50 options contracts also differ significantly in aggregate trading activities. The most active contract
averages 180 trades per day, but the least active contract averages only 42 trades per day. When a contract
is very active and generates large order flows, the exchanges have the incentive to compete and provide the
best quotes on this contract to attract order flow. On the other hand, foran inactive contract, the incentive is
less, since the total order flow on that contract is small. Therefore, stronger competition in the more liquid
contract may more vividly reveal the structural differences among different options exchanges.5
5An options market maker uses the options on QQQ as an example, saying,“We may not actively compete in quoting on many
other options contracts, but we cannot afford not competing strongly for options on QQQ because they constitute the largest order
flow.”
16
Page 19
The columns in Table 4 titled “Aggregate Trading Activity” report the correlation estimates between the
price leadership of ISE for each contract and the aggregate trading activity of that contract on all five options
exchanges. The correlation estimates are larger than the correlations with market shares. Furthermore,
when we measure the aggregate trading activity by the number of trades, allthe correlation estimates are
statistically significant at 95 percent confidence level. The statistical significance declines when we measure
the aggregate trading activity by trading volume.
The two scatter plots in Figure 4 show the relation between the average price leadership of ISE on each
options contract and that option’s trading activity. We observe a generally positive trend in the relation. We
also see that the ISE’s leadership is strongly positive for the most active options contracts.
If more active contracts lead to stronger competition, which in turn show evenmore clearly the structural
differences between different option exchanges, then the results in Figure 4 show that the leadership of the
ISE in price discovery is due to its microstructural design, not to some other factors such as historical client
relations. The latter factor is also unlikely for the ISE because the ISE has only been operating for a short
time and therefore has less of a legacy.
5. Further Analysis of Quotes and Trades
Our information-share analysis shows that ISE’s quotes are the most informative. However, an informative
quote does not necessary lead to a transaction if the bid and ask spread isvery wide. Furthermore, an
exchange can avoid the duty of market making by providing wide bid-ask spreads but agreeing to execute
trades at the best bid offer available. Hence, it is also important to understand how wide the quoted spread
is and whether the posted quotes are readily executable at each options exchange.
5.1. Quote spreads
The magnitude of the bid-ask spreads is a simple and direct measure of transaction cost when all transactions
happen at the quotes. When trades do not always happen on the quotes, the bid-ask spread reveals the
aggressiveness of a specific exchange in providing binding quotes. Since market liquidity often varies
17
Page 20
across different times of a day, we divide each day into half-hour periods and compute the average bid-ask
spreads for each exchange under each half-hour period. The average is a simple time average based on the
expanded second-by-second quote book.
Figure 5 plots the average bid-ask spreads, across both time and the 50 options contracts, for quotes
from the five options exchanges. Of the five option exchanges, the quotes from the ISE have the narrowest
average spreads. The average spread from the ISE is about five cents narrower than the next best, quotes
from the AMEX and the CBOE.
From all exchanges, we also observe wider mean bid-ask spreads in themorning when the market has
just opened. The spread declines as trades proceed, flattening out bynoon.6 Nevertheless, this intraday
pattern does not in any way obscure the predominant leadership of the ISE in providing the narrowest bid-
ask spreads.
In an integrated market, all transactions should happen at the NBBO. Quotes outside the NBBO become
nonbinding. To understand the percentage of times when an exchange provides binding quotes, we compute
the percentages of quotes from a certain exchange that are on the NBBOand on the NBBO alone. We
construct the NBBO by defining the highest bid as the national best bid andlowest ask as the national best
ask.
Figure 6 plots the percentage of quotes from each options exchange thatare on NBBO and on NBBO
alone at different times of the day. About 70 percent of time, ISE’s quotes, both bids and asks, are the NBBO.
The next best (AMEX and CBOE) only have 50 percent of their quotes on NBBO. About 15 percent of time,
ISE’s quotes are the only ones that are at the NBBO. In contract, the percentages of times that quotes from
any other exchanges are on the NBBO alone are less than ten percent.
We can trace the narrow bid-ask spread of the ISE quotes to its unique microstructural design. Quotes
from the ISE are consolidated quotes from 11 market makers, but quotesfrom the other four exchanges are
from one specialist only. Many times, the specialist on the four traditional exchanges is also a competitive
market maker on the ISE. Therefore, if the specialist provides the same quotes to both exchanges, the con-
solidated quotes from the ISE are going to dominate the single-source quote from the other four exchanges
6The information story in Easley and O’Hara (1992) can generate such intraday patterns
18
Page 21
by default. If the specialist provides different quotes to different exchanges, empirical evidence such as in
Simaan, Weaver, and Whitcomb (2003) shows that a specialist is likely to provide more aggressive quotes
when his or her identity is not known to the public. The specialist’s identity is public information on the four
traditional exchanges, but unknown to the public when he or she sends quotes to the ISE. Both arguments
imply that ISE should generate narrower quotes than the other four traditional exchanges do.
Similar to the price discovery result, ISE’s relative aggressiveness in providing binding quotes is also
more obvious in providing asks than in providing bids. The percentage of ISE asks that are on the NBBO
alone is around 16 percent and that for the bids is about 14 percent.
Although the leading position of the ISE is unequivocal in both price discovery and in providing binding
quotes, the ranking of the four traditional exchanges in quoted spreadsis different from the ranking in price
discovery. For example, the quotes from the PCX are more informative thanthose from the AMEX and the
PHLX, but the quoted spreads from the PCX are the widest. The mean bid-ask spread at the PCX is about
ten cents wider than the mean spread at the ISE.
5.2. Quote executability
We investigate whether the options transactions at different exchanges occur at exactly the posted quotes. If
transactions often occur outside the quotes, either the quotes are not firmor the trades are reported with a
delay. On the other hand, if transactions often happen inside the quoted spread at an exchange, either this
exchange is giving preferential treatment to a certain group of clients or itis posting noncompetitive quotes
but agreeing to execute trades at a better price than the posted spreads.Therefore, comparing the percentage
of the trades inside and outside the quoted spreads provides important information on the executability of
the quotes.
We compute the percentage of the transactions at an exchange that occuron, inside, or outside the bid-
ask quotes. Panel A in Table 5 summarizes the results. The most striking observation from this panel is
that the ISE has the highest percentage (84.48 percent) of trades that happen exactly on the bid or ask. This
high percentages shows that the quotes posted at the ISE are not only themost binding, but also the most
executable. In contrast, the PCX has the largest percentages of transactions (70.34 percent) that happen
19
Page 22
inside their bid-ask quotes. Although the PCX mostly posts noncompetitive quotes, the exchange executes
trades that are mostly inside their posted spread.
Panel B of Table 5 reports the percentages of the inside trades that are outside, on, and inside the NBBO.
The most striking result is on the PCX, where 83.96 percent of the inside trades happen exactly on the
NBBO. This finding, together with its widest bid-ask spread and large proportion of noncompetitive quotes,
implies that the PCX attracts order flows by matching the best bid offer, but avoids providing competitive
quotes and hence is shunning part of their market-making duty.
We can also trace the findings on the PCX to its microstructure design. The PCXhas programmed an
“automatic step up” feature into its automatic execution system for small customer orders. An LMM at the
PCX is able to customize his aggressivesness based on the NBBO and the size of the order. There are six
different settings that vary from full, automatic NBBO execution regardless of the state of the market, to
protect from locked and crossed markets, to one tick step up, and to no step up.
Our analysis of the quotes shows a slight asymmetry in behaviors between theasks and bids. The ISE’s
leadership in price discovery is more pronounced in asks than in bids. Thepercentage of the ISE asks on the
NBBO alone is also two-percentage points higher than the percentage of theISE bids on the NBBO alone.
To understand the reason underlying this asymmetry, we investigate whetherthere is an asymmetry in
the buy and sell transaction. We label a transaction a buy from the customerside if the transaction occurs
on the ask side and a sell if the transaction occurs on the bid side. Panel C of Table 5 reports the ratio of
the number of buys to the number of sells on each options exchange. We classify buys and sells using two
criteria. In the first row in panel C, we classify as a buy transaction if the transaction occurs exactly on the
ask quote of this exchange and a sell if the transaction occurs exactly on the bid quote. Under this criterion,
we ignore trades that happen inside or outside the bid/ask quote. In the second row, we use a more inclusive
criterion by classifying any trades that happen above the mid-quote as buys and below the midquote as sells.
We ignore the trades that happen exactly at the midpoint of the quotes.
The two criteria generate similar results. The ratios of buy to sell transactionsare less than one on all
exchanges, indicating that there are more sell trades than buy trades during our one-month sample period.
The most balanced order flow is from the ISE, where the ratio is close to one.
20
Page 23
A buy transaction from the customer generates a short position on the optioncontract for the market
maker. This short position generates much bigger risk exposure than a long position due to the unique
payoff structure of an option contract. We conjecture that some market makers on the traditional exchanges
may be reluctant to take short positions and are therefore not as aggressive in competing for providing ask
quotes as in competing for providing bid quotes. As a result, the ISE is alone on the national best ask more
often than it is alone on the national bid. This reluctance to compete on asks also makes ISE’s leadership in
price discovery more pronounced when we estimate it by using the ask quotes.
5.3. The quoting and trading behavior of the PCX
The quotes from the PCX have a unique feature. Although these quotes are rarely binding and hence rarely
useful, when we measure by information share we find that they are more informative than the quotes from
the AMEX or the PHLX. The reason for this different ranking for PCX mightbe that the PCX mimics a
source of quote that is more informative than that for the quotes at the AMEXor the PHLX.
If the PCX always mimics the quotes from a certain exchange with an-second lag and a fixed spread,
the difference between time-t quote from the PCX and the time-(t −n) quote from this leading exchange
should be a constant for allt,
QPCXt −QL
t−n = constant (11)
Furthermore, this constant should be negative for bids and positive forasks. To identify which exchange the
PCX is mimicking, we run the following set of regressions on both bids and asks,
QPCXt = a+bQj
t−n +ejt,n, j = NBBO,AMEX,CBOE, ISE,PHLX; n = 0,1,2, (12)
whereejt,n denotes the regression residuals.7 From the regression that generates the best fit (the highest
R-square), we can identify the exchange (j) as the one that the PCX is the most likely mimicking and the
number of seconds (n) that the mimicking lags the original source. Furthermore, the slope estimate should
be close to unity under the null hypothesis of a fixed spread.
7We also experiment with regressions on the logarithm of quotes, under thenull hypothesis that the added spread is proportional
to the price level. The average results are similar and thus are not reported.
21
Page 24
We run the regression on each of the 50 option contracts on each of the 20business days. We use the
R-square estimates as a measure for the regression fit. Table 6 reports the sample averages of the regression
R-squares on bids (panel A) and asks (panel B). We observe that theaverageR-square of the regressions
is the largest when we run the regression on the NBBO with zero lags (the bolded numbers). This finding
implies that the PCX possibly mimics the national best bid offer, and does so almost synchronously.
Given a fixed lag, we find approximately the same ranking in terms of theR-square for both bids and
asks. The ranking is, from the largest averageR-square to the smallest NBBO, ISE, CBOE∼ AMEX, and
PHLX. Since quotes from the ISE represent the NBBO about 70 percent of the time (see Figure 6), following
the NBBO is equivalent to following the ISE most of the time. Therefore, it is not surprising to see that the
ISE follows the NBBO in generating the next bestR-square for the above regressions. Furthermore, given
a fixed exchange, the regression with zero-second lag (n = 0) generates the largestR-square, indicating that
the mimicking behavior, when it happens, can be done without visible lags (upto a second).
6. Conclusion
We perform price discovery analysis on the stock options market in the United States and find that the In-
ternational Securities Exchange has become the leader in providing the mostinformative, the most binding,
and the most executable quotes. Perhaps because of both the informativeness and the executability of its
quotes, the ISE has rapidly gained market share in options trading activities. The sample period in this study
shows that the ISE is the third largest in market share. By mid 2003, the ISE had claimed the largest market
share in the options trading activities, excluding the S&P 500 index options.
What makes the ISE quotes the most informative, binding, and executable liesin its key structural
difference from the four traditional options exchanges. In the traditional exchanges, only one market maker
makes the market for a certain class of options. At the ISE, one primary market maker and ten competitive
market makers compete to make market on the same class of options. In fact, most primary market makers
in the traditional exchanges are also competitive market makers on the ISE. When these market makers
provide the same quotes to both exchanges, the consolidated quotes from the ISE almost always dominate
the single-source quote from the other exchanges.
22
Page 25
Most of the traditional options exchanges have realized the challenges facing them and have been
proposing new or reformed trading systems (such as CBOE direct, PCX plus) that are closer to the de-
sign of the ISE. The market is still rapidly evolving. It will be interesting to seehow these options markets
consolidate and develop.
23
Page 26
References
Battalio, R., B. Hatch, and R. Jennings, 2003, “Toward a National Market System for U.S. Exchange-Listed
Equity Options,”Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
Chakravarty, S., H. Gulen, and S. Mayhew, 2003, “Informed Tradingin Stock and Option Markets,”Journal
of Finance, forthcoming.
de Fountnouvelle, P., R. P. H. Fishe, and J. H. Harris, 2003, “The Behavior of Bid-Ask Spreads and Volume
in Options Markets During the Competition for Listings in 1999,”Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2437–2463.
Easley, D., and M. O’Hara, 1992, “Time and the Process of Security Price Adjustment,”Journal of Finance,
47(2), 577–605.
Engle, R. F., and C. W. J. Granger, 1987, “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation,
and Testing,”Econometrica, 55, 251–276.
Greene, W. H., 1993,Econometric Analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, second edn.
Hasbrouck, J., 1995, “One Security, many Markets: Determining the Contributions to Price Discovery,”
Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1175–1199.
, 2003, “Intraday Price Formation in U.S. Equity Index Markets,”Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2375–
2399.
Huang, R. D., 2002, “The Quality of ECN and Nasdaq Market Maker Quotes,” Journal of Finance, 57(3),
1285–1319.
Mayhew, S., 2002, “Competition, Market Structure and Bid-Ask Spreadsin Stock Option Markets,”Journal
of Finance, 57(2), 931–958.
Neal, R., 1987, “Potential Competition and Actual Competition in Equity Options,”Journal of Finance,
42(3), 511–531.
, 1992, “A Comparison of Transaction Costs Between Competitive Market Maker and Specialst
Market Structures,”Journal of Business, 65(3), 317–334.
Simaan, Y., D. G. Weaver, and D. K. Whitcomb, 2003, “Market Maker Quotation Behavior and Pretrade
Transparency,”Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1247–1268.
24
Page 27
Wang, E., 2000, “Competition Among Exchanges: Does Multiple Listing AffectTrading Costs on Options
Market?,” Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.
25
Page 28
Figure 1Quote and trade procedures at the ISE
26
Page 29
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in SecondsP
rice
Impa
ct
Initial Unit Shock to AMEX Bids
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to AMEX Asks
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to CBOE Bids
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to CBOE Asks
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to ISE Bids
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to ISE Asks
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to PCX Bids
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to PCX Asks
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to PHLX Bids
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Lags in Seconds
Pric
e Im
pact
Initial Unit Shock to PHLX Asks
Figure 2Cumulative impulse response functionWe compute the cumulative price impacts based on the estimates of the VECM model. We estimate themodels daily for each option contract with one-second resolution. The plotsare grand averages across alloption contracts and 20 business days in January 2002. The five optionsexchanges are represented bydashed lines (AMEX), dash-dotted lines (CBOE), solid lines (ISE), and dotted lines (PCX, and PHLX).
27
Page 30
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40−0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
ISE Market Share in Number of Trades
ISE
Info
rmat
ion
Sha
re L
eade
rshi
p
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70−0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
ISE Market Share in Trading Volume
ISE
Info
rmat
ion
Sha
re L
eade
rshi
p
Figure 3Price leadership of the ISE and its market shareThe scatter plots depict the relation between the price leadership of ISE andits market share in number oftrades (left) and trading volume (right). The price leadership is the average difference between the informa-tion share of the ISE and the other four exchanges across dates, bids,asks, and lower and upper bounds.
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000−0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Total Number of Trades
ISE
Info
rmat
ion
Sha
re L
eade
rshi
p
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
x 105
−0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Total Trading Volume
ISE
Info
rmat
ion
Sha
re L
eade
rshi
p
Figure 4Price leadership of the ISE and the options trading activityThe scatter plots depict the relation between the price leadership of ISE on acertain options contract and theaggregate trading activity of the options contract. The aggregate trading activity is expressed through thenumber of trades in the left panel and trading volume in the right panel. The price leadership is the averagedifference between the information share of the ISE and the other four exchanges across dates, bids, asks,and lower and upper bounds.
28
Page 31
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1610
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Time of the Day
Mea
n B
id−
Ask
Spr
ead
Figure 5Mean bid-ask spreads for quotes from the five options exchangesThe figure shows the average bid-ask spreads for quotes from the five options exchanges at half-hour in-tervals. The five options exchanges are represented by square-dashed lines (AMEX), diamond-dash-dottedlines (CBOE), circle-solid lines (ISE), star-dotted lines (PCX), and plus-dotted lines (PHLX).
29
Page 32
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Time of the Day
Per
cent
age
on N
BB
O
Bids
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Time of the DayP
erce
ntag
e on
NB
BO
Asks
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.22
Time of the Day
Per
cent
age
on N
BB
O A
lone
Bids
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.22
Time of the Day
Per
cent
age
on N
BB
O A
lone
Asks
Figure 6Percentages of bids and asks on NBBO and NBBO aloneThe figure shows the percentages of quotes from each options exchange that are on the national best bidoffer (NBBO) and that are on the NBBO alone. The five options exchanges are represented by square-dashed lines (AMEX), diamond-dash-dotted lines (CBOE), circle-solid lines (ISE), star-dotted lines (PCX)and plus-dotted lines (PHLX).
30
Page 33
Table 1Trade composition of the 50 multiple listed optionsEntries report the sample mean, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the totalnumber of trades(panel A) and total trading volume (panel B), as well as market shares for each options exchange by tradesand volume, respectively. We compute the summary statistics based on the 50 multiple listed options con-tracts we use for the empirical analysis.
Exchanges A C I P X
Panel A Trades Market Share, %
MEAN 1431.0 20.8 29.6 16.2 25.2 8.2MIN 833 2.3 9.6 5.4 1.9 2.3
MAX 3608 49.8 49.9 35.8 48.8 30.2STD 706.3 11.2 13.0 5.8 12.9 6.2
Panel B Volume Market Share, %
MEAN 46318.7 27.4 30.1 22.0 11.3 9.1MIN 7837 4.0 8.8 5.1 0.5 0.7
MAX 239100 50.9 61.0 67.9 33.8 38.9STD 45813.4 12.7 13.6 11.8 7.2 9.0
31
Page 34
Table 2Information shares of option quotesWe based our information share statistics on a vector error correction model of bids (panels A and B) andasks (panels C and D) from the five option exchanges AMEX, CBOE, ISE, PCX, and PHLX. We estimatethe models at each day for each of the 50 option contracts for January 2002. The table reports the summarystatistics of these daily estimates.
Exchanges AMEX CBOE ISE PCX PHLX
A. Max Information Share From Bids
MAX 0.836 0.881 0.942 0.845 0.801MEAN 0.196 0.226 0.266 0.215 0.143MIN 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000STD 0.166 0.169 0.178 0.172 0.143
B. Min Information Share From Bids
MAX 0.814 0.880 0.941 0.843 0.780MEAN 0.178 0.203 0.247 0.196 0.132MIN 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000STD 0.159 0.161 0.174 0.164 0.138
C. Max Information Share From Asks
MAX 0.810 0.943 0.973 0.984 0.835MEAN 0.189 0.210 0.280 0.215 0.147MIN 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000STD 0.162 0.166 0.181 0.169 0.150
D. Min Information Share From Asks
MAX 0.810 0.943 0.966 0.981 0.834MEAN 0.173 0.191 0.261 0.197 0.137MIN 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000STD 0.158 0.158 0.177 0.162 0.146
32
Page 35
Table 3Price leadership of the ISE over other options exchangesEntries report thet-statistics on the difference between the information share of the ISE and theinformationshare of the other four exchanges. We define the statistics as the mean difference over the standard deviationof the difference, scaled by the square-root of the number of sample points. We compute thet-statisticsbased on the lower bound (MIN) and upper bound (MAX) estimates of the information share on bids andasks.
Exchanges AMEX CBOE PCX PHLX
MAX from Bids 7.70 4.30 5.65 14.60
MIN from Bids 7.88 4.93 5.87 14.06
MAX from Asks 9.92 7.44 7.03 14.89
MIN from Asks 9.94 7.80 7.13 14.35
33
Page 36
Table 4Correlations between the price leadership of the ISE and the trading activitiesEntries report the correlation estimates between the price leadership of the ISE over other four optionsexchanges and trading activity variables. For each option contract, we define the price leadership of the ISEas the average difference between the information share of the ISE and the other four options exchanges,
L =180
20
∑t=1
4
∑i=1
I S t,ISE− I S t,i(τ), i = AMEX,CBOE,PCX,PHLX.
We measure the information share by both the lower and the upper bounds and from both the bids and theasks. The trading-activity variables include the market share of the ISE by both the number of trades andthe trading volume, and the aggregate trading activity of these 50 options by both the number of trades andthe trading volume. We also report thet-statistics of the correlation in parentheses.
Market Share of ISE in Aggregate Trading Activity inCorrelation Number of Trades Trading Volume Number of Trades Trading Volume
MAX from Bids 0.17 0.15 0.30 0.24( 1.17 ) ( 1.06 ) ( 2.15 ) ( 1.74 )
MIN from Bids 0.16 0.15 0.28 0.22( 1.12 ) ( 1.02 ) ( 2.02 ) ( 1.58 )
MAX from Asks 0.17 0.28 0.28 0.19( 1.22 ) ( 2.06 ) ( 2.03 ) ( 1.35 )
MIN from Asks 0.15 0.26 0.28 0.19( 1.03 ) ( 1.90 ) ( 1.99 ) ( 1.32 )
34
Page 37
Table 5Percentage of trades outside (on, inside) the bid-ask QuotesEntries in panel A report the percentages of trades at each exchangethat are outside, on, and inside thatexchange’s bid-ask quote range. For trades that are inside the quote range, panel B reports the percentage ofthese inside quotes that are outside, on, and inside the NBBO. We averagethe estimates across all trades onthe selected 50 option contracts during January of 2002 at each options exchange. Panel C reports the ratioof the number of buy transactions over the number of sell transactions. Weclassify a transaction as a buywhen the transaction happens exactly on the ask in the first row in panel C and when the transaction happensabove the midquote in the second row in panel C. Accordingly, the first rowin panel C defines the sell as atransaction that happens exactly on the bid and the second row defines thesell as a transaction that happensbelow the midquote.
Exchanges AMEX CBOE ISE PCX PHLX
A. Percentages Out Of Total Trades
Outside BA 2.83 3.47 1.81 1.48 3.55On BA 59.35 43.00 84.48 28.19 51.93Inside BA 37.82 53.53 13.71 70.34 44.52
B. Percentages Out Of Inside Trades
Outside NBBO 5.67 8.85 7.63 6.96 5.54On NBBO 75.98 74.99 68.86 83.96 78.33Inside NBBO 18.35 16.16 23.51 9.09 16.13
C. Buy to Sell Ratio
On Ask/Bid 0.78 0.73 0.95 0.82 0.81Above/Below Mid 0.74 0.79 0.95 0.79 0.69
35
Page 38
Table 6The mimicking behavior of PCXEntries report theR-square estimates of the following regression:
QPCXt = a+bQj
t−n +ejt,n, j = NBBO,AMEX,CBOE, ISE,PHLX; n = 0,1,2,
whereQ jt denotes the quote (bid in Panel A and ask in Panel B) from exchangej at timet (seconds). We
perform the regression daily on each option contract. Entries report thesample average (standard error inparentheses) of the estimates across the 50 option contracts and over the 20 business days in January, 2002.
( j,n) 0 1 2
A. Bids
NBBO 0.9275 ( 0.2354 ) 0.9198 ( 0.2486 ) 0.9196 ( 0.2486 )AMEX 0.8288 ( 0.2718 ) 0.8287 ( 0.2718 ) 0.8286 ( 0.2718 )CBOE 0.8326 ( 0.2599 ) 0.8326 ( 0.2599 ) 0.8325 ( 0.2599 )ISE 0.8750 ( 0.2433 ) 0.8750 ( 0.2432 ) 0.8749 ( 0.2432 )PHLX 0.8140 ( 0.2672 ) 0.8139 ( 0.2672 ) 0.8138 ( 0.2672 )
B. Asks
NBBO 0.8488 ( 0.2186 ) 0.8486 ( 0.2186 ) 0.8485 ( 0.2186 )AMEX 0.8057 ( 0.2411 ) 0.8057 ( 0.2411 ) 0.8056 ( 0.2411 )CBOE 0.8009 ( 0.2544 ) 0.8008 ( 0.2544 ) 0.8008 ( 0.2544 )ISE 0.8310 ( 0.2262 ) 0.8310 ( 0.2261 ) 0.8309 ( 0.2261 )PHLX 0.7885 ( 0.2918 ) 0.7884 ( 0.2917 ) 0.7883 ( 0.2917 )
36