Top Banner
1 Mobility policies in the Paris area J.P. Orfeuil Université Paris Est Atelier Transit City 1 Juillet 2011
25

Presny

Mar 28, 2016

Download

Documents

vilmouv v

J.P. Orfeuil Université Paris Est Atelier Transit City 1 Juillet 2011 1 • This process leads to give the responsibility of local and regional networks (investment, operations) to local / regional authorities • They will « do the job »: restriction of the access of the car to the central city (Paris municipality), land use planning and new transport investment in a long term view (region Sdrif) • Dominance of « environmental justification » 2
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Presny

1

Mobility policies in the Paris

area

J.P. OrfeuilUniversité Paris Est

Atelier Transit City 1 Juillet 2011

Page 2: Presny

2

1982-2007 A decentralization process

• This process leads to give the responsibility of local and regional networks (investment, operations) to local / regional authorities

• They will « do the job »: restriction of the access of the car to the central city (Paris municipality), land use planning and new transport investment in a long term view (region Sdrif)

• Dominance of « environmental justification »

Page 3: Presny

3

2007-now

Intervention of the central governmentThe capital region, which is a world city, is

loosing jobs, international influence, etc. The governance of the transport/ land use

system is not at the topAs a result, the “metropolitan idea” is

insufficiently taken into account

Page 4: Presny

4

2007-now

Some support on the diagnosis• From experts on the metropolitan

dimension• From residents, due to lack of quality of

service of the PT system• From residents, who are opposed to new

roads in the “core part” of the region

Page 5: Presny

5

Les TC du Sdrif

Page 6: Presny

6

Exemple(plusieurs pages de ce type)

Page 7: Presny

7

L’annonce du Grand Huit dans la presse

Page 8: Presny

8

Ideas at the departure point• A quick transport network (150 km) opening

the opportunities of urban development and serving current or future clusters

• Financed by private money (on the growth of the land values)

• Contracts for operations not necessarily to “historic operators”

• A development through a specific company, the “Greater Paris company”

Page 9: Presny

9

Au moment de l’accord « historique »(janvier 2011)

Page 10: Presny

10

La carte de mai 2011

Page 11: Presny

11

A guaranted emotional reaction

Immediate perception of the ambitionAssociated with a good story telling

EstheticsNo need to go through rationality process

Evaluation through seduction more than through public participation

Page 12: Presny

12

(Portzamparc)

Page 13: Presny

13

A major criticism

• “We have first to improve the existing network” is the first requirement issued

from the public participation process

Page 14: Presny

14

A storytelling … which is wrong

• A million more jobs in relation to the project…

• Private funding will be marginal only

• Taxes (mainly on companies) will be the solution

• Monopoly of RATP by law

Page 15: Presny

15

The final agreement between the government and the regional authority

• Yes, the existing network will be improved

• Yes, the “Grand Paris network will be built

For a total of 32,4 billion euros from now to 2025

With a usage fee for the operator which ill not exceed 0,8 % of the total investment value

Page 16: Presny

16

Unsolved problems

Page 17: Presny

17

Unsolved problems• Usually, the final investment cost is much higher

than the predicted ones“Underestimated costs + overestimated benefits=

project approval”(Flyjvberg)

• Patronage has very good reasons to be overestimated (hypothesis of a land use control

very strict)• “The infostructure” linked to the

“infrastructure” not taken in consideration

Page 18: Presny

18

Unsolved problems

• “The infostructure” (fare structure, relations to companies, level of

“versement transport) linked to the “infrastructure” not taken in

consideration• Very few expected modal shifts from

cars, so congestion remains, and car remains the main transport mode

Page 19: Presny

19

Unsolved problems

• Impossible to anticipate productivity progresses from the operator

• New taxes on companies and region’s attractivity

• New expenses in the context of economic crisis

Page 20: Presny

20

Sur 225 méga projets dans le monde

Coûts réels / coûts anticipés

Trafics réels / trafics anticipés

Rail +45 % -51 %

Route +20 % +9 %

Page 21: Presny

21

Can we continue that way?

Subsidies to PT operations+ 46 %

Régional GDP2000-2009 + 16 %

Page 22: Presny

22

Comparaison du prix du km pour l’usager Idf / province (2007)

(différence de salaire: + 37 %)Normal, pas normal, ça aurait pu se discuter…

Idf Province

Prix du km TC pour l’usager(c€)

8,7 14,0

Page 23: Presny

23

Fare structures in favor of long commuting

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2z 3 z 4 z 5 z 6 z

Coût / km

Page 24: Presny

24

A huge public support to long distance commuting

2 zones: around 800 euros / year6 zones: environ 5200 euros / year

Page 25: Presny

25

No effort to “import” the “Oyster system from London