1 Mobility policies in the Paris area J.P. Orfeuil Université Paris Est Atelier Transit City 1 Juillet 2011
Mar 28, 2016
1
Mobility policies in the Paris
area
J.P. OrfeuilUniversité Paris Est
Atelier Transit City 1 Juillet 2011
2
1982-2007 A decentralization process
• This process leads to give the responsibility of local and regional networks (investment, operations) to local / regional authorities
• They will « do the job »: restriction of the access of the car to the central city (Paris municipality), land use planning and new transport investment in a long term view (region Sdrif)
• Dominance of « environmental justification »
3
2007-now
Intervention of the central governmentThe capital region, which is a world city, is
loosing jobs, international influence, etc. The governance of the transport/ land use
system is not at the topAs a result, the “metropolitan idea” is
insufficiently taken into account
4
2007-now
Some support on the diagnosis• From experts on the metropolitan
dimension• From residents, due to lack of quality of
service of the PT system• From residents, who are opposed to new
roads in the “core part” of the region
8
Ideas at the departure point• A quick transport network (150 km) opening
the opportunities of urban development and serving current or future clusters
• Financed by private money (on the growth of the land values)
• Contracts for operations not necessarily to “historic operators”
• A development through a specific company, the “Greater Paris company”
11
A guaranted emotional reaction
Immediate perception of the ambitionAssociated with a good story telling
EstheticsNo need to go through rationality process
Evaluation through seduction more than through public participation
13
A major criticism
• “We have first to improve the existing network” is the first requirement issued
from the public participation process
14
A storytelling … which is wrong
• A million more jobs in relation to the project…
• Private funding will be marginal only
• Taxes (mainly on companies) will be the solution
• Monopoly of RATP by law
15
The final agreement between the government and the regional authority
• Yes, the existing network will be improved
• Yes, the “Grand Paris network will be built
For a total of 32,4 billion euros from now to 2025
With a usage fee for the operator which ill not exceed 0,8 % of the total investment value
17
Unsolved problems• Usually, the final investment cost is much higher
than the predicted ones“Underestimated costs + overestimated benefits=
project approval”(Flyjvberg)
• Patronage has very good reasons to be overestimated (hypothesis of a land use control
very strict)• “The infostructure” linked to the
“infrastructure” not taken in consideration
18
Unsolved problems
• “The infostructure” (fare structure, relations to companies, level of
“versement transport) linked to the “infrastructure” not taken in
consideration• Very few expected modal shifts from
cars, so congestion remains, and car remains the main transport mode
19
Unsolved problems
• Impossible to anticipate productivity progresses from the operator
• New taxes on companies and region’s attractivity
• New expenses in the context of economic crisis
20
Sur 225 méga projets dans le monde
Coûts réels / coûts anticipés
Trafics réels / trafics anticipés
Rail +45 % -51 %
Route +20 % +9 %
22
Comparaison du prix du km pour l’usager Idf / province (2007)
(différence de salaire: + 37 %)Normal, pas normal, ça aurait pu se discuter…
Idf Province
Prix du km TC pour l’usager(c€)
8,7 14,0
24
A huge public support to long distance commuting
2 zones: around 800 euros / year6 zones: environ 5200 euros / year