Top Banner
Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012
17
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

Presented to the R2PC Executive CommitteeApril 12, 2012

Page 2: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Census Bureau has been collecting data on migratory patterns since 1940• Migration data released March 28 as

part of American Community Survey (ACS)• First release of migration data since

2000 • ACS Data collected on a rolling annual

average

Page 3: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Question from ACS: “Where did this person live 1 year ago.

• Respondents provide full address.

• Sample gathered over five years.

Page 4: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• In-Migration – 128,400

• Out-Migration – 206,600

• Difference – 78,200 net loss

Page 5: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.
Page 6: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

1. Florida – 13,3002. Ohio – 13,2593. Illinois – 11,1504. California – 7,8285. Indiana – 7,4616. Texas – 6,7397. New York – 4,8878. Wisconsin – 4,8649. North Carolina – 3,70010.Georgia – 3,520

Page 7: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.
Page 8: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

1. Florida – 23,6452. Ohio – 16,2133. Illinois – 13,7424. Texas – 13,1445. Indiana – 12,0896. California – 11,7647. Arizona – 10,8268. North Carolina – 7,8299. Georgia – 7,55610.Tennessee – 6,404

Page 9: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

1. Alaska - 8052. Connecticut – 4393. Vermont - 1444. New Hampshire – 95. Rhode Island - 9

Page 10: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.
Page 11: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Michigan has had a net outflow of population since 1998-99

• Still losing population due to negative out-migration, but significant improvement since 2007-2008

• Dependent on economic conditions the automobile industry

• Out-migration peaks in mid-1970’s, early 1980’s (worst), and since 2000.

Page 12: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Estimates released April, 2012 by Census Bureau

• Components of population change include:• Natural increase/decrease (births minus deaths)• Net international migration (immigrants, emigrants,

military personnel)• Net domestic migration

Page 13: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 46,626

• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 73• Net international migration – 27• Net domestic migration – (208)

• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 46,518

Page 14: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 160,168

• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 319• Net international migration – 72• Net domestic migration – (815)

• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 159,744

Page 15: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 99,762

• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 116• Net international migration – 83• Net domestic migration – (524)

• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 99,437

Page 16: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

• Estimated population, July, 2010 – 306,556

• Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 508• Net international migration – 182• Net domestic migration – (1,547)

• ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 305,669

Page 17: Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012.

Timothy Anderson, AICP, Principal Planner(517) [email protected] sites of interest:American Community Surveyhttp://www.census.gov/acs/www/index.htmlMichigan Censushttp://www.michigan.gov/cgi/US Census Bureauhttp://www.census.gov/