Top Banner
Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway
27

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Jan 18, 2016

Download

Documents

Shaun

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway. Norway n=425. 187. UK n=187. Finland n=221. Ireland n=17. Sweden n=401. 292. Germany n=292. 330. Denmark n=330. Patients Randomized by Country. Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print). SEAS Steering Committee. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Presented byTerje R. Pedersen, M.D.

Oslo, Norway

Page 2: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Patients Randomized by Country

187

330

292

Denmark n=330

Sweden n=401

Norway n=425UK n=187

Germany n=292

Ireland n=17

Finland n=221

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 3: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

SEAS Steering Committee

Terje R. Pedersen (Chairman)

Anne B. Rossebø (Coordinator)

Kurt Boman

John Chambers

Kenneth Egstrup

Eva Gerdts

Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf

Ingar Holme (Statistician)

Antero Y. Kesäniemi

Christoph Nienaber

Simon Ray

Terje Skjærpe

Kristian Wachtell

Ronnie Willenheimer

Nonvoting members:

Philippe Brudi (MSP)

William Malbecq (MSD statistician)

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 4: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

SEAS Study Design

Randomized

Double-blind

Placebo-controlled

Multicentre

4 weeks placebo/diet run-in

Simvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo

Median duration: 4.5 years

(minimum follow-up 4 years)

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 5: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

SEAS: Primary End Point

Major Cardiovascular (CV) Events: CV death

Aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR)

CHF as a result of progression of AS

Non-fatal myocardial infarction

CABG

PCI

Hospitalized unstable angina

Non-hemorrhagic strokePCI = percutaneous coronary intervention

CHF= congestive heart failure

CABG = coronary-artery bypass grafting

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 6: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

SEAS: Secondary End Points

Aortic Valve Events Aortic valve replacement

CHF as a result of progression of AS

CV death

Ischemic CV Events CV death

Nonfatal MI

CABG

PCI

Hospitalized unstable angina

Nonhemorrhagic stroke

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 7: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Other Objectives

Echocardiography

Safety

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 8: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Patient Definition

Men and women

Age 45 - 85 years

Asymptomatic

Valvular AS:

▬ Aortic valve thickening on echocardiographic

evaluation

▬ Doppler jet velocity ≥2.5 - ≤4.0 m/sec

Normal LV systolic function

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 9: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Exclusion Criteria

Statin therapy or indication for statins

Coronary heart disease

Other important valvular disease:

▬ Significant mitral valve stenosis or regurgitation

▬ Severe or predominant aortic regurgitation

▬ Rheumatic valvular disease or AV prosthesis or

subvalvular (hypertrophic, obstructive

cardiomyopathy) or supravalvular AS

Diabetes mellitus

Other conditions precluding participation

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 10: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Baseline Characteristics

Placebo Simvastatin + Ezetimibe

n= 929 n= 944

Age (years) 67.4 67.7

Women (%) 38.8 38.5

SBP (mm Hg) 144 146

DBP (mm Hg) 82 82

Smoker (%) 18 20

Ex-smoker (%) 37 35

Never smoker (%) 45 45

BMI (kg/m2) 26.8 26.9

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 11: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Baseline Medications

Placebo Simvastatin + Ezetimibe

n= 929 n= 944

ACE inhibitors 16.0 14.7

A-II blockers 10.5 10.1

Ca antagonists 17.2 16.6

Beta-blockers 28.8 25.6

ASA 28.0 25.0

Diuretics 24.7 22.1

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 12: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Baseline Lipids and Lipoproteins

Fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein levels at baseline (n=1,873)

Concentration (mmol/L)

Concentration (mg/dL)

Total cholesterol 5.74 222

LDL cholesterol 3.60 139

HDL cholesterol 1.49 58

Triglycerides 1.42 126

Apolipoprotein B - 1.31 (g/L)

Values given as mean ± SD

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 13: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Baseline Echocardiography

Mean Values

Placebo Simvastatin + Ezetimibe

n= 929 n= 944

Transaortic

Peak velocity (m/sec) 3.10 3.09

Peak gradient (mm Hg) 39.6 39.3

Mean gradient (mm Hg) 23.0 22.7

Aortic valve area (cm2) 1.27 1.29

Bicuspid valve (%) 6.3 5.0Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 14: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

LDL-Cholesterol

Intention-to-Treat Population

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

Year

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

Me

an

(m

g/d

L)

±SE

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 15: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Primary End Point MCE

Intention-to-Treat Population

0 1 2 3 4 5Years in study

0

10

20

30

40

50

Pat

ien

ts w

ith

fir

st e

ven

t (%

)

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

Placebo

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

No. at risk

Hazard ratio: 0.96, P=0.591

906 817 713 618 53

884 791 696 586 56

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 16: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Second End Point: Aortic Valve Events

Years in study

PlaceboEzetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mgNo. at risk

914 836 732 635 55 895 814 725 611 58

Intention-to-Treat Population

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

0 1 2 3 4 50

10

20

30

40

50

Hazard ratio: 0.97, P=0.732

Pat

ien

ts w

ith

fir

st e

ven

t (%

)

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 17: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Aortic Valve Replacement

896 816 728 618 61

50Intention-to-Treat Population

0 1 2 3 4 5Years in study

0

10

20

30

40

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

No. at risk

Hazard ratio: 1.00, P=0.968

915

837

734

640

55

Pat

ien

ts w

ith

fir

st e

ven

t (%

)

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).Placebo

Page 18: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Peak Aortic - Jet Velocity

Intention-to-Treat Population

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

Year 1 Year 2 Last follow-up

Time

0.00

0.15

0.30

0.45

0.60

0.75

Ch

ang

e fr

om

bas

elin

e (m

/sec

) m

ean

(±S

E)

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 19: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Second End Point: Ischemic CV Events

PlaceboEzetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

No. at risk

917 898

867 838

823 788

769 729

76 76

Pat

ien

ts w

ith

fir

st e

ven

t (%

)

Intention-to-Treat Population

Years in study

Hazard ratio: 0.78, P=0.024

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

0 1 2 3 4 50

10

20

30

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 20: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

30

Years in study

Placebo

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

No. at risk

925

909

887

862

848

819

797

761

80

80

Pat

ien

ts w

ith

fir

st e

ven

t (%

)Intention-to-Treat Population

Hazard ratio: 0.68, P=0.015

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

0 1 2 3 4 50

10

20

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 21: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Clinical Adverse Events (AE)

Placebo Ezetimibe/ Simvastatin

N=929 N=943*

n n P=

Any serious AE (SAE) 463 468

Drug discontinuationdue to SAE 79 77

All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 22: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Clinical Adverse Events

Placebo Ezetimibe/ Simvastatin

N=929 N=943

n n P=

Any SAE 463 468

Drug disconuationdue to SAE 79 77

Musculoskeletal AE 181 165 0.28

Myopathy / rhabdomyolysis 0 0

All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 23: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Clinical Adverse Events

Placebo Ezetimibe/ Simvastatin

N=929 N=943

n n P=

Any SAE 463 468

Drug disconuationdue to SAE 79 77

Musculoskeletal AE 181 165 0.28

Myopathy / rhabdomyolysis 0 0

New cancer 65 102 0.01

Recurrent cancer, same site 5 3

Cancer (total ) 70 105 0.01

All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 24: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Fatal Cancer

PlaceboEzetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

No. at risk

930 916

912 890

884 865

855 835

89 94

P=0.05 UnadjustedP=0.06 With Log-rank continuity correction

0 1 2 3 4 5Years in study

0

5

10

15

20

Hazard ratio: 1.67

Cu

mu

lati

ve p

erce

nta

ge

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Placebo

Intention-to-Treat Population

n=23 (2.5%)

n=39 (4.1%)

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 25: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Incident Cancer

Site

Placebo(N=929)

Ezetimibe/simvastatin(N=943)

n n

Lip, oral pharynx, oesophagus 1 1

Stomach 1 5 Large bowel / intestine 8 9 Pancreas 1 4 Liver, gallbladder, bile ducts 3 2Lung 10 7Other respiratory 0 1Skin (any) 8 18 Breast 5 8Prostate 13 21 Kidney 2 2

Bladder 7 7

Genital 4 4

Hematological 5 7

Other/unspecified 7 12

All differences are non-significant

All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 26: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

All-cause Mortality

Intention-to-Treat Population

Placebo

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

No. risk

930

916

912

890

884

865

855

835

89

94

Years in study

Hazard ratio: 1.04, P=0.799

0 1 2 3 4 50

10

20

30

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

PlaceboCu

mu

lati

ve p

erce

nta

ge

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).

Page 27: Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway

Major CV Events - Components

ITT Population

Major CV Events

CV Death

AVR

CHF

Nonfatal MI

CABG

PCI

Hospitalized UAP

Nonhematological stroke

End Points

0.1 1.0 10.0

Favours PlaceboFavours Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/40 mg

Hazard ratio (95% CI)# of Events

Placebo Ezetimibe/Simvastatin

355

56

278

23

26

100

17

8

29

333

47

267

25

17

69*

8

5

33

*P=0.02 vs. placebo

Rossebø et al. NEJM 2008;359 (Epub ahead of print).