Top Banner
Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott Chazdon, University of Minnesota Lena Etuk, Oregon State LEARNING FROM COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION (CLDE): CHALLENGES FOR EDUCATORS
13

Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Dec 11, 2015

Download

Documents

Kian Marter
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs

Ken Pigg, University of Missouri

Scott Chazdon, University of Minnesota

Lena Etuk, Oregon State University

LEARNING FROM COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION (CLDE): CHALLENGES FOR EDUCATORS

Page 2: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Thanks to participants of the NCRCRD Impacts of Community Leadership Development Think Tank

•Mary Emery, South Dakota State University•Scott Chazdon, University of Minnesota•Steven Deller, University of Wisconsin• Lena Etuk, Oregon State University•Stephen Gasteyer, Michigan State University•Ken Martin, Ohio State University•Deborah Meehan, Leadership Learning Community•Dan Otto, Iowa State University•Ken Pigg, University of Missouri•Claire Reinelt, Leadership Learning Community•Milan Wall, Heartland Center for Leadership Development

Page 3: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Objectives of Webinar

•Review what we have learned from recently completed research/evaluation of community leadership development programs

•Learning presented in form of five challenges to present practice

•Discussion of challenges raised

Page 4: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Community Effects of Community Leadership Development Education

•Research design

•Participant survey

•Civic engagement/social cohesion

•Community effects

•Organizational effects

•Time on task

Page 5: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Community Leadership Evaluation in Minnesota

Leadership competencies– Leadership competencies (retro pre-post)– Organizational affiliation data (pre-post)

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Page 6: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Ford Institute Leadership Program

•Oregon-based rural community effort

•Theory of change

•Evaluation of:

• Individual outcomes•Network outcomes•Community outcomes

Page 7: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Challenge #1:Leadership Development for What?

Challenges:

Leader Development or Leadership Development

Leadership for what: Civic Engagement or Capacity Building or Resolving Specific issue or Community Development

Page 8: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Challenge #2: Who Participates?

Diversity of ideas – we often use skin color, gender, etc. as indicators

Recruitment challenges

Integration issues

Demographics don’t affect individual level outcomes

Page 9: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Challenge #3:How to Design the Process?

How to cultivate an “acceptable state of disequilibrium”

Projects – maximizing the effect

Active Learning/experiential learning/anticipatory learning

Relationship building

Page 10: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Challenge #4:What Should We Teach?

3 Principles for curriculum development: Direction, alignment, & commitment

Navigating the three levels of content: skills for facilitation, communication/ collaboration, systems thinking

Civic education

Page 11: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Challenge #5:How Do We Know If It’s Working?

Formative vs. Summative Approaches

Community Capitals Framework

Identifying best sources of data

Constructing moveable dials

Page 12: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Next Steps for Educators and Researchers

Critically examine existing CLDE program purpose/theory of change and learning strategies

Design new evaluation approaches to address challenges

Create research efforts to support program learning and accountability

Page 13: Presented by members of a NCRCRD Small Grant-funded Think Tank Evaluating Impacts of Community Leadership Programs Ken Pigg, University of Missouri Scott.

Discussion

•Challenge #1: Leadership Development for What?•Challenge #2: Who Participates?•Challenge #3: How to Design the Process?•Challenge #4: What Should We Teach?•Challenge #5: How Do We Know If It’s Working?