cpha.ca Canadian Experiences in Public Health Advocacy: Canadian Public Health Association The authoritative non-governmental voice for public health in Canada since 1910 Presentation to Increasing Policy Influence and Engagement of National Public Health Associations in Africa; Progress and Challenges 13 th World Congress on Public Health April 23, 2012 James Chauvin, Director of Policy [email protected]
29
Embed
Presentation to Increasing Policy Influence and Engagement of National Public Health Associations in Africa; Progress and Challenges
Canadian Experiences in Public Health Advocacy: Canadian Public Health Association The authoritative non-governmental voice for public health in Canada since 1910. Presentation to Increasing Policy Influence and Engagement of National Public - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
cpha.ca
Canadian Experiences inPublic Health Advocacy:
Canadian Public Health Association
The authoritative non-governmental voice for public health in Canada since 1910
Presentation toIncreasing Policy Influence and Engagement of National Public
Health Associations in Africa; Progress and Challenges
13th World Congress on Public HealthApril 23, 2012
• Social Determinants of Health• Implications for CPHA
cpha.ca
CPHA: What is it?
• Founded in 1910• Act of Parliament 1912• Represents public health in Canada with links to
the international public health community• Only Canadian NGO solely focused on public
health• Only national voice for PH in Canada until 2003
cpha.ca
CPHA: Who are we?
• National in scope, international in reach• Voluntary individual membership• Charitable status• Primarily an advocacy organization• CPHA members believe in universal and
equitable access to the basic conditions which are necessary to achieve health for all Canadians
cpha.ca
Some days, policy advocacy feels like this….
cpha.ca
And some days you may need some of this….
cpha.ca
And then there are the days when it all goes like this….
cpha.ca
CPHA’s Policy Advocacy History
• 101 years advocating for healthy public policy & practice
• Application for intervener status before Supreme Court (Insite appeal)
• Analysis of CPHA’s Documents and Statements over 30 years and Recommendations for Future Action
• Response to the 2010 and 2011 Federal Budgets• Presentation to several Parliamentary committees• NCD Prevention, SDH/health equity
11
cpha.ca
CPHA Policy/advocacy 2012+
• Position Papers on Ecosystem Health and Illegal Psychoactive Substances
• Endorsement of Low-Risk Cannabis Guidelines
• The place of Public Health within a renewed Federal/Provincial/Territorial Health Fund Transfer Agreement
• The SDH/Health Equity as they affect particularly vulnerable populations (youth, indigenous people)
12
cpha.ca
Mining and Export of Chrysotile Asbestos
Photo: Sonumadhavan
photo by Alexey Plovarov
cpha.ca
CPHA’s Position
1. Ban mining, use and export of asbestos2. Cease funding of Chrysotile Institute3. Establish national surveillance system and registry for
asbestos-related diseases and workers exposed to asbestos4. Just/adequate transition assistance income support and
training for asbestos industry workers and financial assistance to their communities
5. Complete removal and replacement of asbestos-containing insulation in indigenous community housing
6. Fair compensation provided to people suffering from asbestos-related diseases
7. All public and commercial buildings have asbestos-containing materials identified and managed to observe strict OH&S standards
cpha.ca
Quo vadis?
• Investigate the use of federal funds provided to the Chrysotile Institute
• Continue to communicate CPHA’s position and concerns to GoC and media
• Advocate for Cdn technical assistance to build OH&S policies and practice in export recipient countries
• Continue engaging Cdn PH community on the issue
cpha.ca
Safe Injection Drug Facility: Insite
cpha.ca
What is Insite?
• PHS Community Services Society – non-profit community NGO
• Provides housing and support to hard to reach, house and treat people in Vancouver’s downtown east side
• Health & social services facility authorized and funded by British Columbia gov’t
• Houses Canada’s only safe injection facility
cpha.ca
Population of DTES
• Injection drug use = 15 years average• 51% inject heroin; 32% cocaine• 87% infected with HCV; 17% HIV• 18% aboriginal• 20% homeless, majority living in poor housing• 80% have been incarcerated• 38% involved in sex trade• 59% reported a non-fatal overdose• 21% using methadone
cpha.ca
The Issue
• People using illegal injection drugs within confines of safe injection facility liable to prosecution for possessing a controlled substance [CDSA, s. 4(1)]
• Insite staff liable to prosecution for trafficking [CDSA, s 5(1)]
• Users and staff afforded exemption from prosecution by federal Minister of Health under CDSA s. 56 (September 2003, for 3 yrs)
cpha.ca
Judicial Issues
• Federal constitutional power to legislate re criminal law cannot interfere with provincial power re health care – interjurisdictional immunity/paramountcy
• CDSA sections 4(1) and 5(1) unconstitutional – deprive people addicted to one or more controlled substances access to health care – violates S7 of Charter of Rights and Freedoms
• Unfettered discretion of Minister of Health unconstitutional
cpha.ca
Judicial Interventions
• Supreme Court of British Columbia (2008). Plaintiff: PHS Community Services et al/Defendant: Attorney General of Canada
• Court of Appeal for British Columbia (2010). Plaintiff: Attorney General of Canada et al/Defendant: PHS Community Services et al.
• Supreme Court of Canada (May 2011). Appellant: Attorney General of Canada et al/Respondent: PHS Community Services et al
• Several interveners, including CPHA
cpha.ca
CPHA’s Position
• Addiction is an illness, not a lifestyle choice• Insite reduces risk to overdose and infection,
promotes counselling/treatment• Drugs do not cause HIV or HCV• Risk morbidity/mortality associated with injecting
reduced with presence of qualified health professional
• Insite did not increase drug-related loitering, drug dealing, drug-related crime, drug use nor promote “drug use acceptable” messaging
cpha.ca
CPHA’s Legal Arguments
• CDSA s. 4(1) is unconstitutional as applied to health care services delivered at Insite – deprives individuals of their life, liberty and security interests
• s. 4(1) fails to protect the public from harms associated with drug use
• s. 4(1) provision “overboard, arbitrary and grossly disproportionate, violating s. 7 of Charter
• “discouraging the use of safe-injection services harms individual and public health and safety”
cpha.ca
Supreme Court Decision (30/09/11)
• Unanimous, written by Chief Justice• The delivery of health care services is not
immune from federal interference• CDSA constitutionally valid and applicable to
Insite under fed/prov division of powers• However, application of CDSA ss. 4(1) & 5(1)
deprives Insite clients of Charter rights (s. 7)• Covers staff (possession/trafficking) and clients• Minister of Health compelled to provide
exemption
cpha.ca
Where do we go from here?
• Insite can operate – Minister obliged to provide exemption
• Future safe-injection drug sites• Application of Charter 7 to other harm
reduction situations
cpha.ca
cpha.ca
Frontline Health: Beyond Health Care
• Building the case for investments in public health and in particular the SDH
• Develop position statement on a whole-of-government approach to health equity/SDH
• Creating awareness/understanding among media, politicians and press
• Knowledge exchange/transfer within Cdn PH community (experiential)
• Telling the story about HE/SDH in Canada
cpha.ca
Implications for CPHA
• Raises visibility of CPHA• Impact/influence on policy and practice• Reinforced/expanded advocacy activities• Puts us in the federal government’s sites
cpha.ca
“The world we have created is a product of our thinking; it cannot be changed