Presentation title Presentation subhead Survey on nutrient measurements in laboratories (Task 3) Objectives 1. The need of using similar analytical methods for micronutrient measurements throughout Europe. 2. Identify protocols for nutrient measurement in laboratories, assess their validity and suggest improvements which will lead to new laboratory standards and/or methods.
17
Embed
Presentation title Presentation subhead Survey on nutrient measurements in laboratories (Task 3) Objectives 1.The need of using similar analytical methods.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Presentation title
Presentation subhead
Survey on nutrient measurements in laboratories (Task 3)
Objectives
1. The need of using similar analytical methods for micronutrient measurements throughout Europe.
2. Identify protocols for nutrient measurement in laboratories, assess their validity and suggest improvements which will lead to new laboratory standards and/or methods.
2
cp. FOODLAB Ltd
Nicosia- CYPRUS
3
What to Do
• Search for methods for analysis of micronutrients in Europe (e.g. vitamins, fatty acids, minerals, phytonutrients)
• Collate the methods.• Find out advantages and disadvantages of the methods in
measuring the levels of those micronutrients in food and food products.
• Study the problems and difficulties suggested. • Suggest any possible modifications in the analysis of these
components.• Propose protocols that could be used throughout European
analytical laboratories that could combine all the benefits of each specific analysis of the micronutrients
4
Skip Work…………..
Example Results …………..
5
Laboratories and MethodsMinerals in Food
(Cu, Se, Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Zn, Li)
Total no of Labs 127
Method AAS 77
Method GFAAS 17
Method Hydride 14
Method ICP MS 10
Method ICP OES 9
6
Laboratories and MethodsMinerals in Water
(Cu, Se, Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Zn)
Total no of Labs 440
Method AAS 86
Method GFAAS 19
Method titrimetric
19
Method ICP MS 115
Method ICP OES
201
7
Laboratories and Methods
Vitamin B12
Total no of Labs 23
Method ELISA 3
Method HPLC 10
Method Microbiological 10
8
General Comments
1. For methods with the number of laboratories reporting less than 3, no comments can be made.
2. AAS means Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer
3. GFASS mean Graphite Furnace AAS
4. Hydride means Hydride Generator Technique
5. ICP means Inductive Coupled Plasma Spectrophotometer
6. ICP OES mean ICP optical emission Spectrophotometer
7. ICP MS means ICP mass selective Spectrophotometer
9
Comments
For Iodine
It appears that the use of ICP - MS give an accurate measurement with no failing rates in performing the analyses.
The use of other methods appear to be problematic.
10
Comments
For Vitamins
It appears that today's methods do not always give an accurate measurement with a large failing rate.
11
Possible problems in the analytical procedure(Food Micronutrient Analyses)
Ashing procedure Possible Problems Microwave Procedure Possible Problems
Ashing at High Temperature
Loss of measurands and/or sample
Sampling Small size sample
Filtering Loss of sample and/or contamination
Dedicated containers for MW
Possible contamination
Dilution Arithmetic error or not cleaned containers
Digestion For multi-samples different procedures
are needed
Moisture determination
Arithmetic error and/or sample loss
About 4 hours are needed
About one hour is needed
12
Plus in the analytical procedure
Ashing procedure Microwave Procedure
High Sample mass No sample Loss
Single Sample procedure No filtering req.
Low Cost of consumables Digestion complete
Less expensive equipment Quicker
13
ICP-OES Vs ICP-MS
Water at mg/l Similar Performance
(8-11% failure rate)
Water at μg/l Better OES performance
Possible Reason:
The ICP-MS is a new instrument in the market and the experience in its use not quite as good
The environmental conditions affect the ICP-MS
14
Vitamins
• Three methods are used today for the determination of Vitamins:
– HPLC– Microbiological– Eliza
• A number of problems appear in any of the above methods. There is no evidence that one of the method is more successful than the rest, mainly due to the small size of the samples received.
• There is a general ‘feeling’ that the HPLC methods should be given a push. This is mainly due to the smaller time required to perform the analyses (as compared to the microbiological).
• It appears that the laboratories are not willing to participate in PTs. This is mainly due to the problematic participations and the frequent failures.
15
Suggestion
To continue to work on Vitamins. Meaning:
– Collaborate with Universities, official bodies, and/or other laboratories to examine the methods experimentally and possibly develop methods for vitamin determination.
16
Dissemination
Already
1. Presented the Work toa. The Council of the Cyprus Association of Dieticians and Nutritionistb. The Council of the Cyprus Consumer Associationc. An effort will be made to present the work to the conference of the
Dieticians and Nutritionists in Cyprus (Nov., 2008)
2. Article on the findings was accepted for publication by the Journal of Accreditation and Quality Assurance (reviewed Journal)