[email protected]| Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective | EARLI 2013 Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective EARLI-symposium on formative feedback in digitale interaction to enhance learning 28 august 2013 Drs. Esther van Popta SCO-ICTO Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen Prof. dr. Robert-Jan Simons Prof. dr. Rob Martens en Dr. Gino Camp Dr. Marijke Kral
16
Embed
Presentation on Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective for EARLI2013
Presentation on Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective for EARLI2013 in EARLI-symposium on formative feedback in digitale interaction to enhance learning 28 august 2013
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
[email protected] | Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective | EARLI 2013 27-31 Aug
Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective
EARLI-symposium on formative feedbackin digitale interaction to enhance learning28 august 2013Drs. Esther van PoptaSCO-ICTO Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen
Prof. dr. Robert-Jan SimonsProf. dr. Rob Martens en Dr. Gino CampDr. Marijke Kral
[email protected] | Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective | EARLI 2013 27-31 Aug
Focus (1)• This study focuses on peerfeedback • Peerfeedback is a practice where feedback is given by one
student to another. Peer feedback is used to provide students more opportunities to learn from each other. After students finish an assignment, student work together to check each other's work and give comments to the peer partner. Comments from peers are called as peer feedback. Peer feedback can be in the form of corrections, opinions, suggestions, ideas to each other. Thus, peer feedback is a two-way process in which one cooperates with the other
[email protected] | Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective | EARLI 2013 27-31 Aug
Focus (2)• Most of the research on the added value of peerfeedback
focuses on the benefits for the receiver (Kim (2005), Sluijsmans e.a. (2002) Prins e.a. (2006), Gielen e.a. (2010)).
• Little research is done on the learning benefits for the giver of the peerfeedback (Boud (2010), Cowan (2010), Sadler (2010), vd Berg e.a. (2006))
• Findings from the Giver’s Perspective (Nicol, Thomson and Breslin, 2013) show that: ‘producing feedback engages students in multiple acts of evaluative judgement both about the work of peers and, through a reflective process, about their own work’.
[email protected] | Quality of Online Peer Feedback from the Giver’s Perspective | EARLI 2013 27-31 Aug
AimIf students benefit from producing/giving peerfeedback, it
would be interesting to find out if the feedback can be used as evidence for the development of competences
Is it possible for students to demonstrate their own understanding of the course content (this defines the quality of the feedback) in their given peer feedback?
Aim of this study is to determine if the given peer feedback can be used to assess the development of competence of the giver