Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI WELCOME to the GROUP SABARI of AEEs of 2008 BATCH VIJAYAKUMAR SREEKANTA M.Tech;MHRM; Master Trainer (GoI) FACULTY,WALAMTARI
Dec 16, 2015
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
WELCOME
to the
GROUP SABARIof
AEEs of 2008 BATCH
VIJAYAKUMAR SREEKANTAM.Tech;MHRM;
Master Trainer (GoI)FACULTY,WALAMTARI
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OFF - TAKE SLUICE - IMPORTANCE
- DESIGN PRINCIPLES
by
VIJAYAKUMAR SREEKANTAM.Tech;MHRM;
Master Trainer (GoI)FACULTY,WALAMTARI
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OFF –TAKE SLUICE- IRRIGATION SYSTEM
OT-L2
OT-L3
OT –R 1 OT-L1
HR
OT Channel
OT C
hannel
Left Main CanalRight Main Canal
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OFF TAKE SLUICE- It is the main structure in an irrigation
system
- Draws a specified amount of water from parent canal to the distributory
- It is at the head of a distributory
- It passes the required designed discharge
- It is to organize water delivery in a planned way in an irrigation system
- It can be of barrel or Pipe
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OFF- TAKE SLUICE COMPONENTS
• Vent way
Barrel , Pipe
• Head walls / Wings & Returns
Up stream & Down Stream
• Hoist
Shutters & Hoist Equipment
• Upstream & Down Stream Bed Levels
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OFF- TAKE SLUICE - DESIGN FEATURES
• Flow condition for which the OT vent way is to be designed (Full supply / Half supply)
• Fixation of sill of Off Take sluice in reference to parent canal Bed level (atio of ‘q / Q’)
• Using appropriate formula for Vent way design (Barrel / Pipe) from DRIVING HEAD point of view
• Provision of control arrangements; Hoist etc• Floor thickness ( Uplift conditions)
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OFF- TAKE SLUICE – DESIGN DATA REQUIRED
-Hydraulic particulars of
Parent canal
Distributory
at the point of proposed OT location
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
So to ensure delivery of required quantity of water in the
irrigation channel ….
we need to
Design an Off take sluice at the head of every distributory / channel
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OFF- TAKE SLUICE –
WORKED OUT EXAMPLE
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
s.no Particulars Parental Canal Off-take
1 F.S. discharge 11.5 cumecs 0.84 cumecs
2 Velocity 0.44 m / sec -----------------
3 Section 10.5 mx 1.52 m 2.44m x 0.68m
4 Surface fall 1/5280 1/3000
5 Banks L/R 3.66m/1.82m 1.82m/1.82m
6 Half supply level +48.46 -----
7 Bed level +47.40 +47.55
8 F.S. Level +48.92 +48.23
9 T.B. Level +49.83 +48.84
10 Ground level +48.46 +48.46
HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
OT DESIGN:
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
Perecentage of off take discharge to parent canal discharge
Height of sill above the bed of parent canal when the F.S.D. in the parent
canal is Above 2.13 below 2.13 m to 1.22 m 1.22M
Remarks
15% and above
0.07m 0.07m 0.07m The sill of the sluicesShould also be fixedSuch that Lower and lower as the location goes towards the end of the distributaries and minors.
10% to 15% 0.15m 0.07m 0.07m
5% to 10% 0.30m 0.15m 0.07m
2% to 5% 0.46m 0.30m 0.15m
1% to 2% 0.61m 0.46m 030m
0.5% to 1% 0.76m 0.61m 0.46m
Less than 0.5%
0.91m 0.76m 0.61m
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
Hence a vent way of 0.91 m x 0.65 m is provided giving an area of 0.59 m2 The dimensions of the shutter may be 1.06m x0.71 m
B ) Scour depth Calculations: a)Scour depth at the entrance
q = discharge per meter width = 11.5/10.81 = 1.063 cumecs
(Average width= 10.05 + 1.52/2 = 10.81 m) f = silt factor , equal to 1
q2
R = depth of scour below water surface = 1.346 (-----)1/3 f
As this is only a normal reach without any obstruction, no factor of safety is
Considered and R = 1.346 x 1.0632/3 = 1.403 m. below F.S.L.(against 1.52 m FSD) However 0.46m. deep cut off is provided.
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
b) Scour depth at the end of Downstream wings: q = 0.84/2.44 = 0.3481 or 0.348 cumecs f = silt factor equal to 1
R (with a factor of safety of 1.5) = 1.343 x 1.5 x 0.342/3= 0.99 m
Depth below B.L. = 0.99 – 0.68 = 0.31 m
Floor thickness itself is 0.46 m No cut off is therefore provided.
C) Exit gradient (GE), Uplift pressures and Thickness of floor Calculations:
a) Exit Gradient:The total effective horizontal length of floor b = 10.97m. d = depth of downstream cut off =
0.46 m Head acting H = 48.92 – 47.55 = 1.37 m 1/α = D/B = 0.46/10.97 = 0.417 Φ D’ = 8% = 8/100 x 1.37 = 0.1096 m
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
GE = 0.84 x 0.1096/0.46 = 0.20 < 0.3
Which is less than 0.3, hence safe.
b)Uplift Pressure:
Uplift head resisted by floor of the barrel:
The thickness of floor under barrel = 0.38 m
R2 = 0.4552 + (R-0.19)2 = 0.21 + R2 – 0.38 R + 0.036
= 0.246 – 0.38 R
R = 0.246/0.38 = 0.64
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
0.64 – 0.19Cot α = ------------------- = 0.99 0.455µ L t--- x ----- x cot α = --- x p1 2 2Where µ = the maximum safe uplift pressure head taken by arch action.L= span of arch = 0.91 m (width of barrel)T = thickness of floor = 0.38 mP = mean permissible stress at the crown of the arch section and is taken equal to
27.34 t/m2
µ 0.91 0.38--- x -------- x 0.99 = -------- x 27.341 2 2
0.38 x 27.34µ = -------------------- = 11.53 m
0.91 x 0.99Hence the floor of the barrel is safe against uplift head of 48.92 – 47.40 = 1.52 mc) Thickness of floor:Percentage of pressure at D/s head wall
(92-8)= 8 + ------- x 2.51 = 8 + 19.3 = 27.3%
10.97Considering buoyant weight of foundation concrete and 75% of theoretical head.
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
The thickness of floor required27.3 75 1
= 1.37 x ---------x --------- x ------- = 0.22 m00 100 1.25
as against 0.46m thick provided. Hence safeD) DESIGN OF SUB-STRUCTURE:
1. Design of upstream head wall:
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
S.No
Force
Particulars
Magni-tude
Lever arm (mrs)
Moment in t.m.
1. W1 0.52x415x1/100 = 0.2158 0.26 0.0561
2. W2 0.52x0.93x2243/1000 = 1.0847 0.26 0.2820
3. PV 0.0384[(1.54)2 – 0.61)2] x 2083/1000
=0.1600
------ -----
Total vertical load (V) 1.46054.
PH
0.134[(1.54)2 – (0.61)2] x 2083/1000
= 0.556 0.372 0.2072
Total Moments (M) 0.5453
Taking moments about point ‘A’W1 = 415 kg/m2 live load
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
M 0,5453L.A of the resultant load = --- = ------------- = 0.37 m V 1.4605
0.52Eccentricity = 0.37 - --------- = 0.11 m
2 1.4605 6x0.11Stresses = ------------ (1 ± -------- )
0.52 0.52 1.4605 = --------------- (1±0.66/0.52) 0.52
Stress = 6.33 t/m2 (Compressive) & 0.725 t/m2 (tension)
As there will be arch action due to abutting of side walls these stresses may be neglected.
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
2.Design of Lintel under upstream head wall:
(a) Main reinforcement : Slab in proximity to earth or moisture
The clear Span = 0.91
Thickness of slab assumed = 10.2 cm (overall)
Effective depth = 7.75 cm (assumed)
Effective span = 0.98 m.
Maximum compressive stress = 6.33 t/m2
6.33 Average loading = --------- x 8000 = 3165 kg/m2
210.2 x 2403
Dead weight of slab = ------------------ 100
= 245 kg/m
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
Total uniformly distributed load = 3165 + 245 = 3410 kg.
3410 x 0.982
B.M. due to this U.D.L. = ---------------------- x 100 8
= 32750 kg. cm. Adopt HYSD bars & M15 mix
32750Effective depth = ------------------ --= 6.319 cm
8.203 x 100
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
However adopt 7.75 cm as assumed
Using 10 mm.dia.bars
Total depth = 7.75 + 0.50 + 1.92 = 10.17 or 10.2 cm 32750
Area of steel required = -------------------- = 3.22 cm2
500 x 0.875 x 7.75
Area of 10mm. dia bar = 0.79 cm2
Spacing of 10mm.dia bars
0.79 x 100= --------------- = 24.54 3.22
Adopt a spacing of 15cm centres (equal to the spacing of barrel slab reinforcement)
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
(b) Check for Shear: 3410 x 0.98
Maximum shear at the support = ---------------------- = 1551 kg 2
1551Shear stress =---------------------------- = 2.00 kg/cm2
1.0 x 75 x 100
Percentage steel = 0.68. allowable shear stress as per tables = 3.26 kg /cm2
Check for Bond:Maximum shear force at the support = 1551 kg.
100Perimeters of bars = (----------- +1) π X 1/m width
2 x 15Bond stress, for M 15 alternate bars cranked 1551 = ---------------------------------------------- = 16.82 kg/cm2
100 0.875 x 7.75 x π x 1 (----------- +1)
2 x 15 Provide 50 Φ anchorage
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
3. Design of slab over barrel:
(a) Main reinforcement:
Clear span = 0.91 m
The thickness of slab = 10.2 cm
Using 10 mm.dia. bars and a clear cover of 1.92 cm
The effective depth = 10.2 – 0.50 – 1.92 = 7.78 cm or 7.75 cm.
Effective span = 0.91 + 0.0775 = 0.98 m
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
Dead weight of slab/metre width = 10.2 x 2403/100 = 245 kg.
Weight of earth (including live load) = 1.90 x 2.83 x 1.0 = 3958 kg
.Total U.D.L = 4203 kg.
Assuming partial fixity
4203 x 0.982 x 100B.M = ------------------------- = 40366 kg.cm
10 40366
Effective depth = √-------------------- = 7.015 cm 8.203 x 100
Adopt 7.75 cm. effective depth as assumed.Area of steel
40366 = ( --------------------------- ) = 3.96 cm 2 1500 x 7.75 x 0.875
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
0.79 x 100Spacing of 10 mm dia. Bars = ------------------------ = 19.91 cm
3.968Adopt a spacing of 15cm.
5.266Percentage steel = ---------- = 0.68
7.75(b)Check for shear:
Maximum shear force at support = 4203 x 0.98/2 = 2060 kg.
2060Actual shear stress = (-------------------)
7.75 x 100= 2.66 kg/cm2 < allowable shear stress as per tables = 3.26. Hence safe.
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
(c)Check for Bond:
Maximum shear force = 2069 kg.
Perimeter of 50% bars per metre width, alternate bar cracked. 100= (----------- +1) π X 1 = 13.61 cm 2 x 15
060Bond stress = ------------------------------ = 22.32 kg/cm2
0.875 x 7.75 x 13.61
Provide 30cm of anchorage
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
4 Design of side walls for the barrel
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
Force Particulars
Magnitude (t)
Level arm (m)
Moment in t.m
W1 0.68 X 1.90 X 2083/1000 = 2.679 0.497 1.331
W2 0.68 X 10.2/100 X 2403/1000
= 0.159 0.497 0.079
W3 0.225 X (0.76 + 0.08) X 2403/1000
= 0.424 0.497 0.211
W4 0.225 X 1.90 X 2083/1000 = 1.009 0.273 0.275
W5 0.225 X 1.90 X 2243/1000 = 0.475 0.273 0.129
W6 0.16 X 2.02 X 2083/1000 = 0.667 0.08 0.053
(a) Stresses in masonry: Taking moments about point A.
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
W7 0.16 X 0.84/2 X 2083/1000
= 0.140 0.053 0.008
W8 0.16 X 0.84/2 X 2243/1000
= 0.151 0.11 0.017
PV 0.384 (2.542 – 1.902) 2083/1000
= 0356 ----------- -----------
Total vertical load (V)
6.060PH 0.134 (2.842 – 1.902)
2083/1000 1.244 0.372 0.46
Total Moments (M) 2.563
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
2.563L.A. of the resultant = ---------------- = 0.42 m
6.060
Eccentricity = 0.42 - 0.61/2 = 0.12 m
1/6th of base width = 0.61 / 6 = 0.10m
6.060 6 x 0.12Stresses = -----------(1±--------------------) = 9.934 (1±1.2) 0.61 0.61
Maximum stress (compressiove)= 9.934 x 2.2 = 21.86 t/m2
Minimum stress (tension) = 9.934 x 0.2 = 2.0 t/m2
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
Force Particulars Magnitude (t) Level arm (m)
Moment( tm)
W1 Same as force = 2.579 0.717 1.927
W2 “ = 0.159 0.717 0.114
W3 “ = 0.424 0.717 0.303
W4 “ = 1.009 0.493 0.497
W5 “ = 0.475 0.493 0.234
W6 “ = 0.667 0.30 0.200
W7 “ = 0.140 0.273 0.038
W8 “ = 0.151 0.33 0.050
W9 0.22 x 2.84 x2.83/1000 = 1.301 0.11 0.143
W10 1.05 x 0.38 x 2243/1000 = 0.895 0.525 0.470
PV 0.384 (3.222 – 1.902) 2083/1000 = 0.541/8.441 ----------- -----------
Total vertical load (V) 8.441
PH 0.134 (2.842 – 1.902) 2083/1000 = 1.886 0.48 0.905
Total Moments (M) 4.881
(b) Stress on soil:
Taking moments about point B.
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
L.A of the resultant = 4.881/8.441 = 0.578 m
Eccentricity = 0.578 – 0525 = 0.053 m
1/ 6th of the base width = 1.05/6 = 0.175 m
8.441 6 x 0.053Stresses = -----------(1±--------------------) = 9.934 (1±1.2) 1.05 1.05
Maximum compressive stress = 8.039 x 1.3029 = 10.47 t/m2
Minimum compressive stress = 8.039 x 0.697 = 5.60 t/m2
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Presentation of S.VIJAYA KUMAR,Faculty WALAMTARI
THANK YOU