8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
1/25
Planning for success:Culture, engagement and powerin English language education
innovationDavid Hayes
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
2/25
Success in English, beginning at theschool level is a key factor in national
competitiveness and is of paramountimportance to national economies in a
globalised world.
Developing proficiency in English is ofpressing concern to education ministries
around the world.
Research shows that, in some countries,proficiency in English, in the context of
additive bilingualism, has beendemonstrated to correlate positively withincreased earning power for individuals
(Posel and Casale 2011).
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
3/25
O
Governments Investment in projects
LCE
CLT
These investments do not appearto have produced the changes toestablished patterns of classroom
interaction to accord with newcurriculum guidelines or to haveraised student achievement as
their funders intended
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
4/25
What lies behind this consistent pattern of failure?
Schweisfurth (2011) identifies a number of barriers toimplementation of LCE ( Learner-centred education) andCLT (Communicative Language teaching)
O The nature of the change expected is too great and the
speed at which it is required to happen is too rapid.O In many countries, the resources to support innovation
school infrastructure, class size, teaching-learningmaterials, and teacher capacityare severelyconstrained.
O
Innovations based on imported pedagogy are oftenopposed to local cultural values in various ways.
O Change is driven by people who do not have to implementit, either donor agencies external to the context oreducational administrators and policy makers internal to it.
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
5/25
The export of educational
reformsCLT is seen by some as part of thelinguistic imperialism of the west
(Phillipson 1992;2001).
O Western English language educators areseen, wittingly or unwittingly, to colludewith commercial publishing interests toexport CLT around the globe.
O Some version of CLT and a learner-centred curriculum for English is to beseen in state education systems in mostcountries.
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
6/25
Examples of the negative effects of theLinguistic imperialism
O Curriculum Reform Implementation project (CRIP)in Papua New Guinea.
Australian CRIP consultants pushed the projectthrough quickly and soon started producing policydocuments like the National Curriculum Statementand Assessment Policy, which they claimed werewritten by Papua New Guineans for Papua New
Guineans.But it didnt ring true.
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
7/25
Examples of the negative effects of the
Linguistic imperialism
Gu (2005) analyses the experience of British Council
projects advocating the use of CLT in Chinese
universities and comments that:
O As Chinese teachers saw it, what British
specialists were lacking were crosscultural
adaptability and an understanding of the
Chinese educational context.(Gu ibid.:292)
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
8/25
O Though there may indeed be something to be
learnt from others experience, the attemptsimply to transfer best practice in education
from one country to another is a cause of
failure in much innovation.
O Any conclusions about what may be best
practice in English language (or any other)educational innovation need to be framed
within the constraints and opportunities of the
context(s) in which the innovation is to be
implemented, as well as within an
understanding of the sociocultural and
historical context of the system from which the
innovative practices derive.
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
9/25
What makes for successful
innovationThe systemic nature of innovationthe importance of
joined-up thinking
Some causes of failure of pedagogical innovations
O Policy tends to ignore the fact that reform in one area hasan impact on other areas of the systemthere is nojoined-up thinking.
O Even where individual teachers do manage to overcomethe cultural change factors, they may encounter resistancefrom other teachers who feel that new pedagogical
behaviour does not fit with local accepted school norms.O Mismatches between mandated teaching-learning
approaches and high-stakes examinations.
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
10/25
The Systematic Nature of Innovation:Lessons from experience
O Those responsible for English language innovation mustnot think of it in isolation from other aspects of an
education system
O Human and material resources
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
11/25
O Understand its likely impact on the wider educational
context.
O Evaluation (innovation design)
O High-stakes examination procedures
O Necessary commitment (Teachers)
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
12/25
Grass-roots stakeholder involvement the importance of listening to teachers
O A cause of persistent failure in educational innovation
(Schweisfurth, 2011). Wedell remarks that:
at national level educational-change policy makers and plannersoften seem able to delude themselves that it is not necessary to think
about how the people affected by implementation will react to change,
or about how the implementation process might be affected by the
existing classroom conditions.
(Wedell op.cit.: 45)
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
13/25
Fullan and Stiegelbauer state that:
If educational change depends on what teachers do and think its as simple
and complex as that, then central to effective innovation is an appreciation of
teachers views of what will and will not work in their classrooms.
(Fullan and Stiegelbauer, 1991)
O Murray and Christison describe teachers as the linchpinsin the implementation process.
O Teachers are an untappedresource. (Prapaisit de Segovia andHardison, 2009)
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
14/25
O The practical outcome of this failure to consult those
responsible for implementing innovations in theclassroom can be observed in Hayes (2010) casestudy of a teacher of English in north-east Thailand.The teacher spoke about the demands of trying toimplement reforms with inadequate training or support:
The Ministry of Education, I think they have a very good intention todevelop or
to reform education but people, people who are supposed to do their job,they
dont have any motivation or knowledge to do it. Like when they said writeyour
own material which is relevant to your students needs, for example.
(Hayes ibid.: 313)
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
15/25
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
16/25
O For Canagrajahs(2002), this teachers experience can be
seen as supportthis is perhaps the right moment to empower thelocal knowledge of teachers.
O Local pedagogical knowledge
O Prescriptive advice on methods
O Curriculum and syllabus development
O Inimical to educational systems
O Schools are generally rule-steered
O Berg, 2000, explains that street-level bureaucrats get directives
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
17/25
Grass-roots involvement:Lessons from experience
O Centralised control of teachers work
O In essence, their sense of a professional self is under
threat (Hayes 2006: 160)O Reform process
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
18/25
Adequate support during the process
of implementation
As the teacher in Hayes (2010) case study in section 3.2 lamented,
education officials may have very good intentions but they often fail to
appreciate the demands they are placing on teachers, when they ask them
to innovate.
O OSullivan(2001: 111) reminds us that:The process of implementing change can be very deep.
O For many education systems, the implementation of an innovation is
simply a matter of providing in-service courses for maximum
effectiveness in the classroom.
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
19/25
O Cascade systems have also been criticized for offering diluted trainingthe further one progresses down the cascade, though, where this hashappened, the lack of take-up at grass-roots level may be as much a
function of the lack of consultation with teachers by policy makers in theinitial stages of curriculum (re)design as the cascade model itself
(Gilpin 1997).
O Hayes (2000) feels that cascades can be made to work successfully
provided, inter alia, that they operate with notions of professional
development which go beyond top-down, skills-based training. Hisexperience is that the most productive courses are those that adopt areflexive approach vis--vis the curriculum innovation.
O Research also favours a cyclical programme of in-service courses formaximum effectiveness in the classroom. OSullivans (2001) study ofcourses in Namibia revealed that teachers benefited from linked
programmes of courses.
O One of the reasons for the lack of this type of coaching (or mentoring) isobviously the cost
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
20/25
Adequate support for implementation:
lessons from experience
O Supportive conditions
Muijs and Lindsay (2008: 195) note that the literature has confirmed
that where teachers are able to reflect, access new ideas, experiment, andshare
experiences within school cultures and where leaders encourage appropriate
levels of challenge and support, there is greater potential for school and
classroom improvement.
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
21/25
Power and leadership in Managing
InnovationO Innovation in English language education, like any other
form of change, should be seen as a process, and one
which needs to be managed (Wedell op.cit.).
O Ministry of Education
O Support from administrators for change, crucially
at local as well as national level, and effective management
of change at all levels of the educational system is vital
(Wedell op.cit.).
O Motivation/Demotivation
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
22/25
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
23/25
ConclusionsO All education systems must cope with change (Wedell
op.cit.) and if innovations are to be successfullyimplemented.
Policy and resourcesO Educational innovation is not value- or culture-free but
must be considered in relation to the context in which it isto be implemented.
1. Contextualized2. Pedagogical innovation
3. Human resources
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
24/25
Stakeholder Engagement
O No matter how sound an innovation might be
theoretically, if it does not secure the wholehearted
support of the people who have to transfer it from theory
to practice in the classroom, the chances of successful
implementation are very limited.
1.Support
2.Help at all stages (training)
3.Sharing practice
8/12/2019 Presentation of ELT
25/25
ManagementO Educational innovation is a process, rather than
something which is accomplished simply through
policy statements at ministry level, though these
official policies are clearly a necessary element in thatprocess.
1. Power from Ministries
2. Efective management
3. Support with other members charged with
management