Top Banner
When high-achieving women and minorities underperform: The dangers of stereotype threat Talia Ben-Zeev Psychology Department San Francisco State University
21
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Presentation File

When high-achieving women and minorities underperform:

The dangers ofstereotype threat

Talia Ben-Zeev

Psychology Department

San Francisco State University

Page 2: Presentation File

With the collaboration of:

Cristina CarrasquilloKristen McDonaldDaniel NewhallGillian PattonDavid RogersTonya Stoddard

Alison ChingTattiya KliengklomTiffany Stewart

Dr. Michael Inzlicht, NYUDr. Steven Fein, Williams College

The Team

Page 3: Presentation File

The real world

• Is there a sex difference in math performance?

Page 4: Presentation File

Poorer performancein a high achieving

population

Claude Steele (e.g., 1997) vs. Benbow & Stanley (1980)

Stereotype threat:A phenomenon, which occurs when an individual isplaced in a setting in which the individual is reminded thathe/she is at risk of confirming a negative stereotype abouthis/her group.

The experience of stereotype threat may, in turn, interfere with intellectual performance, especially whenindividuals are highly identified with success andachievement in the given domain.

Page 5: Presentation File

Stereotype threat andthe environment

Condition 1: All Female Condition 2: Female Minority

Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev (2000)

Page 6: Presentation File

Experiment 1: Subjects: 72 female undergraduates

Test Type

math verbal

Condition

All female

Femaleminority

same

same

higher

lower

same

same

Page 7: Presentation File

Experiment 1: Results

0.30.35

0.40.45

0.50.55

0.60.65

0.70.75

0.8

math verbal

Test

minoritysame-sex

Page 8: Presentation File

Experiment 2aSubjects: Ninety-two male and female undergraduates

Sex

females males

Condition

Same sex

Minority

same

same

higher

lower

same

same

Page 9: Presentation File

Experiment 2a: Results

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

females males

sex of participant

minority

same-sex

Page 10: Presentation File

Experiment 2b

Females in the same-sex condition scored the highest(M = .70, SE = .04)

Females in the minority condition scored the lowest(M = .58, SE = .03),

Females in the mixed-sex majority conditionscored in the middle (M = .64, SE = .03)

We added a mixed-sex majority condition for females

Page 11: Presentation File

A threatening environment can cause problem-solving

deficits

Simply placing a female in a test-taking situationwith males causes a decrease in her performance

The makeup of the social environment can induce problem-solving deficits but via which mediating processes?

Page 12: Presentation File

The theoretical framework:Threat vs. Challenge

Appraisals

Stereotypeactivation

Threat

Challenge

Underperformance

IncreasedCatecholamines

IncreasedCortisol

Optimalperformance

Cognitiveappraisal

PhysiologicalEffects (arousal)

Performanceeffects

Page 13: Presentation File

The Yerkes Dodson law

Robert M. Yerkes and John D. Dodson, The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation (1908)Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482).

Low Optimum High

Performance

Arousal

Page 14: Presentation File

Experiment 3Experiment 3Mis-attribution of arousalBen-Zeev, Inzlicht, & Fein (under review)

“subliminal noise” control

Condition

Same sex

Minority

higher

lower

same

same

Page 15: Presentation File

Experiment 3Experiment 3

“subliminal noise” control

Condition

Same sex

Minority32%

33% 44%

40%

Mis-attribution of arousalBen-Zeev, Inzlicht, & Fein (under review)

Page 16: Presentation File

At our SFSU labWork in Progress:

QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Daniel Newhall:Cortisol and Stereotype Threat

Page 17: Presentation File

At our SFSU labWork in Progress:

Cristina Carassquillowith Kristen McDonald and Alison ChingThreat vs. Challenge in Asian American Females

Page 18: Presentation File

At our SFSU lab:Work in Progress

Phoebe: “90% of a woman’s pheromones come out the top of her head. That’s why women are shorter, so that men will fall in love when they hug them.”

Tonya Stoddard and Tattiya Kliengklom:How subtle is stereotype threat?

Page 19: Presentation File

At our SFSU labWork in Progress:

Tiffany Stewart and Gillian PattonWho is most susceptible to threat?

Page 20: Presentation File

Our research agenda:Threat vs. Challenge

Stereotypeactivation

Threat

Challenge

Underperformance

IncreasedCatecholamines

IncreasedCortisol

Optimalperformance

Cognitiveappraisal

PhysiologicalEffects (arousal)

Performanceeffects

Page 21: Presentation File

Stereotypes, neurophysiology, &

intellectual performance

Turning threat into challenge:Understanding how stereotypes affectneurophysiology and intellectual performance mayhelp create interventions for stigmatized individualswho are susceptible to underperformance under threat