Presentation downloadable from 1 Sustainability Workshop – Hobart 1 st May, 2008.

11Presentation downloadable from www.tececo.com

Sustainability Workshop – Hobart 1st May, 2008


Urgent Fixes are Needed Water

• 1/3 of world population stressed for water

• By 2050 2/3 due to global warming

Waste• Around 600 million tonnes.• The underlying moleconomic

flow is poisoning our world CO2

• Causing global temperature rises

Energy• Peak oil has passed and fossil

fuel energy costs set to rise. Food

• Growing food shortages due to climate change and production of bio fuels

To solve these problems we need to change the way we do things and what we do them with!

All these problems are interconnected


The Atmosphere

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

Yrs

CFC CO2 CH4 PCBs SO2 Water PM10

Emission

Lifetime in Atmosphere

High Low

Source: Sam Nelson Greenbase

Source: IPCC

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_atmosphere 17 Feb 08

Even if the annual flow of emissions was frozen today, the level of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere would still reach double its pre-industrial levels by 2050. In fact, emissions are increasing rapidly and the level of 550 ppm could be reached as early as 2035.

Stern review Executive Summary Page 3 para 6

The Challenge is to Keep the Atmosphere Stable. To do this we must take a long term view and engineer a new way for us to live.


CO2 in the AtmosphereGigaton CO2

Year

BAUEmissions

450 ppm

?

?

CO2 in the Atmosphere


The Kyoto Protocol

A treaty intended to implement the objectives and principles agreed in the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Requires governments to agree to quantified limits on their greenhouse gas emissions, through sequential rounds of negotiations for successive commitment periods.

The Kyoto treaty is the result of political negotiation and diplomatic compromise and on the surface not a lot more than short term promises to reduce emissions that make politicians look good that their successors cannot possibly keep. It is not a strategy for survival in the future. A long term view is required.

Constraint alone is not going to work


We are Hooked On Fossil Fuel Energy

Emissions targets are unlikely to be met whilst fossil fuels remain

Assuming Kyoto commitments are met (which is unlikely) it is estimated that global emissions will be 41% higher in 2010 than in 1990 ( Ford, M., Matysek, A, Jakeman, G., Gurney, A & Fisher B. S. 2006, Perspectives on International Climate Change, paper presented at the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics society 50th Annual Conference). www.aares.info/files/2006_matysek.pdf.

A solution is needed of the utmost urgency to preserve history for many, many generations to come.

Sir Richard Branson at the launch of the Virgin Earth Prize

Gaia Engineering is the way to do so – John Harrison


Correlation Between WIP and Emissions

World Industrial Product (deflated world `GDP' in real value - i.e. World physical production).

CO2 emissions (in CO2 mass units: Doubling time = 29 years. Data: CDIAC; statistics: GDI.

The correlation between the WIP and the CO2 emissions is very high. The correlation coefficient r= 0.995, i.e. practically 1 (total correlation). Di Fazio’s work demonstrates that we cannot achieve sustainability through efficiency alone.

Di Fazio, Alberto, The fallacy of pure efficiency gain measures to control future climate change, Astronomical Observatory of Rome and the Global Dynamics Institute


Synopsis We are too many and our influence too great. We must

therefore accept our role of maintaining “spaceship earth” as planetary engineers and find ways of maintaining the level of carbon dioxide, oxygen and other gases in the atmosphere at desirable levels.

We are too hooked on fossil fuels and cannot possibly arrest the alarming increases in carbon dioxide currently occurring through efficiency, emissions reduction or substitution by renewables.

Constraint will not lift the third world to our level of affluence.

We must find new technology platforms that will otherwise we have no hope of controlling population


Synopsis We have a good chance of preserving the future if we mimic

nature by finding uses for carbon and other wastes.

Uses for carbon and other wastes must result in a real value that puts profit in the pocket of a large number who will as a consequence wish to engage otherwise they cannot be implemented on the massive scale required.

The markets created must be insatiable, large and indefinitely continuing.

Building with man made carbonate is doable and most likely presents the only option we have for saving the planet from runaway global warming until such time as safe and reliable forms of energy alternative to fossil fuels can be developed, we more seriously take our relationship with the planet and our role as planetary engineers and custodians.


Affect of Leakage on Geosequestration

Source: CANA (2004). Carbon Leakage and Geosequestration, Climate Action Network Australia.

"The assumption of exclusive reliance on storage may be an extreme one, however the example illustrates that emphasis on energy efficiency and increased reliance on renewable energy must be priority areas for greenhouse gas mitigation. The higher the expected leakage rate and the larger the uncertainty, the less attractive geosequestration is compared to other mitigation alternatives such as shifting to renewable energy sources, and improved efficiency in production and consumption of energy."

Downloadable Model at http://www.tececo.com/files/spreadsheets/GaiaEngineeringVGeoSequestrationV1_26Apr08.xls


Size of Carbon Sinks

Modified from Figure 2 Ziock, H. J. and D. P. Harrison. "Zero Emission Coal Power, a New Concept." from http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/2b2.pdf by the inclusion of a bar to represent sedimentary sinks


Carbonate sediment40,000,000 Gt

Fossil Fuels 8,000 Gt

Soils and Detritus 1600 Gt

Plants 600 Gt

Methane Clathrates100,000 Gt

Sequestration Permanence and time

Carbon Sink Permanence


Gaia Engineering will Modify the Carbon Cycle

Photosynthesis by plants and

algae

Consumed by heterotrophs

(mainly animals)

Organic compounds made

by autotrophs

Organic compounds made by heterotrophs

Cellular Respiration

Cellular Respiration burning and

decay

Limestone coal and oil

burning

Gaia Engineering, (Greensols, TecEco

Kiln and Eco-Cements)

Decay by fungi and bacteria

CO2 in the air and water

More about Gaia Engineering athttp://www.tececo.com.au/simple.gaiaengineering_summary.php


Can Building and Construction Represents an Insatiable, Large and Indefinitely Continuing Market for Carbonate?

The built environment is made of materials and is our footprint on earth.• It comprises buildings and infrastructure.

Construction materials comprise• 70% of materials flows (buildings, infrastructure etc.)• 40-50% of waste that goes to landfill (15 % of new

materials going to site are wasted.) Around 25 billion tonnes of building materials are used

annually on a world wide basis. The single biggest materials flow (after water) is concrete at

around 17 billion tonnes or > 2 tonnes per man, woman and child on the planet.

40% of total energy in the industrialised world (researchandmarkets)

Why not use magnesium carbonate aggregates and building components from Greensols and Eco-Cements from TecEco to bind them together?


The Earth System

Anthropo-

sphere

The earth system consists of positive and negative feedback loops.

Small changes caused by man such as CO2 and other climate forcing as well as pollution impact right across all interconnected systems throughout the global commons.


Earth Systems Science

Source graphic: NASA

Earth system science treats the entire Earth as a system in its own right, which evolves as a result of positive and negative feedback between constituent systems (Wiki). These systems are ideally homeostatic.

Earth Systems

Atmospheric composition, climate, land cover, marine ecosystems, pollution, coastal zones, freshwater salinity etc.


The Techno-ProcessUnderlying the techno-process that describes and controls the flow of matter and energy through the supply and waste chains are molecular stocks and flows. If out of synch with earth systems these moleconomic flows have detrimental affects.

To reduce the impact on earth systems new technical paradigms need to be invented and cultural changes evolve that result in materials flows with underlying molecular flows that mimic or at least do not interfere with natural flows and that support rather than detrimentally impact on earth systems.

Detrimental affects on earth systems

Move 500-600 billion

tonnes

Use some 50 billion

tonnes

Take

Waste

Materials

Materials

I am contemplating profitable bottom up change of immense proportion and importance.

John Harrison, TecEco


Detrimental Impacts of the Techno-Process

Take manipulate and make impacts

End of lifecycle impacts

Greater Utility Less Utility

Materials are everything between the take and waste and affect earth system flows.

There is no such place as “away”

Use impacts.Materials are in

the Techno-Sphere Utility

zone

Detrimental Linkages that affect earth

system flows


Moleconomic FlowsTake → Manipulate → Make → Use → Waste

[ ←Materials flow→ ]

[ ← Underlying molecular flow → ]

If the underlying molecular flows are “out of tune” with nature there is damage to the environment

e.g. heavy metals, cfc’s, c=halogen compounds and CO2

Moleconomics is the study of the form of atoms in molecules, their flow, interactions, balances, stocks and positions. What we take from the environment around us, how we manipulate and make materials out of what we take and what we waste result in underlying molecular flows that affect earth systems. These flows should mimic, balance or minimally interfere with natural flows.

To fix the molecular flows that are impacting our planet we must first fix the materials flows in a bottom up approach


Innovative New Materials - the Key to Sustainability

Biosphere - Geosphere Techno - World

Materials are the substance of the techno-process, the link between the biosphere and techno-sphere and the key to sustainability. They are everything between and define the take and waste.

By changing how we make “things” and what we make them with we can fix the underlying molecular flows that are destroying the natural homeostasis of our planet

The choice of materials for building and construction controls emissions, lifetime and embodied energies, user comfort, use of recycled wastes, durability, recyclability and the properties of wastes returned to the bio-geo-sphere.


Economically Driven Sustainability

New, more profitable technical paradigms are required that result in more sustainable and usually more efficient moleconomic flows that mimic natural flows or better, reverse our damaging flows.$ - ECONOMICS - $

Change is only possible economically. It will not happen because it is necessary or right.


Consider Sustainability as Where Culture and Technology Meet

Increase in demand/price ratio for greater sustainability due to cultural change.

#

$

Demand

Supply

Increase in supply/price ratio for more sustainable products due to technical innovation.

Equilibrium

ShiftECONOMICSGreater Value/for impact (Sustainability) and economic growth

A measure of the degree of sustainability is where the demand for more sustainable technologies is met by their supply.

We must rapidly move both the supply and demand curves for sustainability


Changing the Technology Paradigm

“By enabling us to make productive use of particular raw materials, technology determines what constitutes a physical resource1”

1.Pilzer, Paul Zane, Unlimited Wealth, The Theory and Practice of Economic Alchemy, Crown Publishers Inc. New York.1990

It is not so much a matter of “dematerialisation” as a question of changing the underlying moleconomic flows. We need materials that require less energy to make them, do not pollute the environment with CO2 and other releases, last much longer and that contribute properties that reduce lifetime energies. The key is to change the technology paradigms

Or more simply – the technical paradigm determines what is or is not a resource!


Cultural Change is Happening! Al Gore (SOS) CSIRO reports STERN Report Lots of Talkfest IPCC Report Political change Branson Prize Live Earth

(07/07/07) The media have an important growing role


Recycle

Re-use

Take only renewables

Waste only what is biodegradable or can be re-assimilated

Manipulate Make Use

Reduce

Changing the Techno-Process

ReduceRe-useRecycle

=> Materials =>

Take => manipulate => make => use => waste

The Flow of Atoms and Molecules in the global commons

Driven by fossil fuel energy with take and waste impacts.

This is biomimicry!

By changing the technology paradigms we can change the materials flows and thus the underlying molecular flows.

Moleconomics


Nature is our Mentor (Biomimicry) All that is alive is very efficiently in balance with surrounding

conditions including all else that is alive.• The waste from one plant or animal is the food or home for another.• Photosynthesis balances respiration.• Growth balances disintegration.

There is a strong need for similar efficiency and homeostatic balance in the techno process.• To balance emissions of carbon dioxide with uses and waste nothing that

has no natural role on the planet.

By studying Nature we learn who we are, what we are and how we are to be.” (Wright, F.L. 1957:269)

Nature provides us with survival knowledge from a four billion year old experiment. It is this knowledge, not our genetics that is the key.

John Harrison


Biomimicry - Geomimicry

All natural processes are very economical. We must also be MUCH more economical

The term biomimicry was popularised by the book of the same name written by Janine Benyus

Biomimicry is a method of solving problems that uses natural processes and systems as a source of knowledge and inspiration.

It involves nature as model, measure and mentor. Geomimicry is similar to biomimicry but models geological

rather than biological processes.

The theory behind biomimicry is that natural processes and systems have evolved over several billion years through a process of research and development commonly referred to as evolution. A reoccurring theme in natural systems is the cyclical flow of matter in such a way that there is no waste of matter and very little of energy.Geomimicry is a natural extension of biomimicry and applies to geological rather than living processes


Biomimicry - Ultimate Recyclers As peak oil starts to cut in and the price of transport rises

sharply• We should not just be recycling based on chemical property requiring

transport to large centralised sophisticated and expensive facilities

• We should be including CO2 and wastes based on physical properties as well as chemical composition in composites whereby they become local resources.

Jackdaws and bower bird recycle all sorts of things they find nearby based on physical property. The birds are not concerned about chemical composition and the nests they make could be described as a composite materials.

TecEco cements are benign binders that can incorporate all sort of wastes without reaction problems and bind strongly to them by polar bonding with them. We can do the same as the Jackdaw or bower bird


Localized Low Transport Embodied Energy Materials

No longer an option?

As the price of fuel rises past peak oil, the use of localised low embodied energy materials for construction will have to be considered. We will have to mimic the jackdaw or bower bird.


Utilizing Carbon and Wastes During earth's geological history large tonnages of carbon

were put away as limestone and other carbonates and as coal and petroleum by the activity of plants and animals.

Sequestering carbon in calcium and magnesium carbonate materials and other wastes in the built environment mimics nature in that carbon is used in the homes or skeletal structures of most plants and animals.

In eco-cement concretes the binder is carbonate and the aggregates are preferably carbonates and wastes. This is “geomimicry”

CO2

C

CO2

Waste

CO2

CO2

Pervious pavement


Geomimicry There are 1.2-3 grams of

magnesium and about .4 grams of calcium in every litre of seawater.

There is enoughcalcium and magnesiumin seawater with replenishmentto last billions of years at current needs for sequestration.

To survive we must build our homes like these seashells using CO2 and alkali metal cations. This is geomimicry

Carbonate sediments such as these cliffs represent billionsof years of sequestrationand cover 7% of the crust.


Geomimicry for Planetary Engineers? Large tonnages of carbon (7% of the crust) were put

away during earth’s geological history as limestone, dolomite and magnesite, mostly by the activity of plants and animals.• Orders of magnitude more than as coal or petroleum!

Shellfish built shells from carbon and trees turn it into wood.

These same plants and animals wasted nothing• The waste from one is the food or home for another.

Because of the colossal size of the flows involved the answer to the problems of greenhouse gas and waste is to use them both in an insatiable, large and indefinitely continuing market.

Such a market exists for building and construction materials.


Geomimicry for Planetary Engineers? Such a paradigm shift in resource usage will

not occur because it is the right thing to do. It can only happen economically. To put an economic value on carbon and

wastes• We have not choice but to invent new technical

paradigms such as offered by TecEco and the Global Sustainability Alliance (Gaia Engineering).

• Evolving culturally to effectively use these technical paradigms

By using carbon dioxide and other wastes as building materials we can economically reduce their concentration in the global commons.

Materials are very important!


Why Magnesium Carbonates? Because of the low molecular weight of

magnesium, it is ideal for scrubbing CO2 out of the air and sequestering the gas into the built environment:

Due to the lighter molar mass of magnesium more CO2 is captured than in calcium systems as the calculations below show.

At 2.09% of the crust magnesium is the 8th most abundant element

Sea-water contains 1.29 g/l compared to calcium at .412 g/l

Magnesium compounds have low pH and polar bond in composites making them suitable for the utilisation of other wastes.

%5284

44

3

2

MgCO

CO %43101

44

3

2

CaCO

CO

Seawater Reference Data

g/l H20

Cation

radius

(pm)

Chloride (Cl--) 19 167

Sodium (Na+) 10.5 116

Sulfate (S04--) 2.7 ?

Magnesium (Mg++) 1.29 86

Calcium (Ca++)0.41

2 114

Potassium (K+)

0.399 152


Making Carbonate Building Materials to Solve the Global Warming Problem Magnesium materials from Gaia Engineering are potential low

cost. New kiln technology from TecEco will enable easy low cost simple non fossil fuel calcination of magnesium carbonate to make binders with the CO2 recycling to produce more carbonate building material to be used with these binders.

How much magnesium carbonate would have to be deposited to solve the problem of global warming?

• The annual flux of CO2 is around 12 billion tonnes ~= 22.99 billion tonnes magnesite

• The density of magnesite is 3 gm/cm3 or 3 tonne/metre3 22.9/3 billion cubic metres ~= 7.63 cubic kilometres of

magnesite would have to be deposited each year. Compared to the over seven cubic kilometres of concrete we

make every year, the problem of global warming looks surmountable.

If magnesite was our building material of choice and we could make it without releases as is the case with Gaia Engineering, we have the problem as good as solved!

We must build with carbonate and waste


Only the Built Environment is Big Enough

Source of graphics: Nic Svenningson UNEP SMB2007

The built environment is our footprint, the major proportion of the techno-sphere and our lasting legacy on the planet. It comprises buildings and infrastructure


Building is Going Ballistic!

The relative impact of the built environment is rising as the East catches up with the West!

Source of graphic: Rick Fedrizzi SMB 2007


Huge Potential for Sequestration and Waste Utilisation in the Built Environment

Reducing the impact of the take and waste phases of the techno-process by.• including carbon in materials

they are potentially carbon sinks.• including wastes for

physical properties aswell as chemical compositionthey become resources.

• re engineering materials toreduce the lifetime energyof buildings

A durable low pH high bondingbinder system is requiredfor effective waste utilisationsuch as TecEco Tec andEco-Cements

Many wastes including CO2 can contribute to physical properties reducing lifetime energies

CO2

C

CO2

Waste

CO2

CO2

Pervious pavement


Implementation of Carbon Trading The system must serve different

requirements• Incentives/costs as a result of increases or

decreases in emissions• National accounting

Not impose a burden on• The building construction and• Rental industries (Affordability crisis anyway)• Owners

Comply with the Kyoto Protocol• E.g. no double counting


WBCSD & WRI Published some guidelines that

the Australian government seem to be following.

According to the methodology:• Emissions can be accounted for on

a Control basis, or

• At an organisational or financial level Equity basis

• As in consolidations


WBCSD & WRI Everything must be accounted for at and

organisational or equity level in order to apply incentives or disincentives, but at a national level double counting must be eliminated

To help delineate direct and indirect emission sources, improve transparency, and provide utility for different types of organizations and different types of climate policies and business goals, three “scopes” (scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3) have been defined:


WBCSD & WRI Scopes Scope 1

Covers direct emissions from sources within the boundary of an organisation, such as fuel combustion and manufacturing processes.

Scope 2Covers indirect emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, steam or heat produced by another organisation. Scope 2 emissions result from the combustion of fuel to generate the electricity, steam or heat and do not include emissions associated with the production of fuel. Scopes 1 and 2 are carefully defined to ensure that two or more organisations do not report the same emissions under the same scope (i.e. so double counting can be eliminated at a national level).

Scope 3Includes all other indirect emissions that are a consequence of an organisation’s activities but are not from sources owned or controlled by the organisation. These estimates are provided for information only as Scope 3 emissions and are not be required to be reported under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 , but may be reported on a voluntary basis.


Implementation in Building and Construction

Characterised by• Long supply and waste chains with

many different operators all contributing to emissions

• Fragmented representation at both the building and construction as well as use levels

• Some scope 1 emissions but mostly scope 2 and 3.


Nick Svenningson UNEP at SMB2007

The Built Environment Materials in use

have a big influence on scope 2 emissions

AASMIC believe materials (using factors) should be included (scope 3)

Scope 3 emissions approx 10% (Interpreted from RMIT Report)

(RMIT 30-50%)

(GBCA 45%)

Mainly lifetime heating, cooling and other running costs


Players BPIC (http://www.bpic.asn.au/bpic_bpi.html)

• The Building Products Innovation Council will be a major driving force in advocating a technical and building regulatory environment that will support a world class Australian building product manufacturing and supply base

NATSPEC (http://www.natspec.com.au/)• Founded in 1975, is a not-for-profit organisation that is

owned by the design, build, construct and property industry through professional associations and government property groups. It is impartial and is not involved in advocacy or policy development. NATSPEC’s major service is the comprehensive national specification system endorsed by government and professional bodies. The specification is for all building structures with specialist packages for architects, interior designers, landscape architects, structural engineers, service engineers and domestic owners.


Players Green Building Council of Australia

(http://www.gbcaus.org/) • The GBCA is a national, not-for-profit organisation that is

committed to developing a sustainable property industry for Australia by encouraging the adoption of green building practices. It is uniquely supported by both industry and governments across the country.

GECA (http://www.aela.org.au/)• Good environmental choice - Committed to credible

product information for sustainable development Asbec (http://www.asbec.asn.au/about)

• Claims to be a peak body? Many others

Presentation downloadable from 1 Sustainability Workshop – Hobart 1 st May, 2008.

Documents

presentation downloadable

global emissions

atmosphere slide

co2 emissions

emissions reduction

interconnected slide

greenhouse gas emissions

annual flow of emissions