© 2009 | Jos Arets | Vivian Heijnen | Lei Ortmans | TU220 1. Informal learning Funeral I & II 2. HPI Funeral III 3. Social so6ware / Web 2.0 Funeral IV 4. The Wedding?
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
1. InformallearningFuneral I & II
2. HPIFuneral III
3. Socialso6ware/Web2.0Funeral IV
4. TheWedding?
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Themostimportantcontribu?onmanagementneedstomakeinthe21stcenturyistoincreasetheproduc?vityofknowledgeworkandknowledgeworkers.Itisontheirproduc?vity,aboveall,thatthefutureprosperityandindeedthefuturesurvivalofthedevelopedeconomieswillincreasinglydepend.PeterDrucker
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
‘Asmartenterpriseisahigh‐performingorganizaGonthatallowsknowledgeandcapabiliGes,enabledbytechnology,togrowandflowfreelyacrossdepartmental,geographical,orhierarchicalboundaries,whereitissharedandmadeacGonablefortheuseandbenefitofall.‘– FocusonknowledgeandapplicaGon– EffecGveuseoftechnology– SystemaGcanddynamicapproach– Anemphasisonbothindividualsandteams
– AperformancefoundaGon
MarcRosenberg(2006)
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Searching
Referencing
Conversa?ons
Modeling
Feedback
Collabora?ng
Sharing
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Incontextlearning
Informallearning
Formallearning
Performancesupport
24/7/365
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
However,thereisnoresearchtobackuptheamountofmoneyspentoninformalandformallearningintheabovechart.Thenumbersweresimplypulledoutofthinair(Cross,2007).
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
workworkworkwork work work
searching referencing collabora?ng
learning
traintrain
LanceDublin,2007
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
"ExecuGvesdon’twantlearning;theywantexecuGon.”
Theywantperformance.Companiesuseitto:
‐ImproveknowledgeworkerproducGvity20%‐30%
‐IncreasesalesbyGoogle‐izingproductknowledge
‐GeneratefreshideasandincreaseinnovaGon
‐Reducestress,absenteeism,andhealthcarecosts
‐Increaseprofessionalismandprofessionalgrowth
‐Cutcostsandimproveresponsivenesswithself‐service
learning“ JayCross,informallearning2006
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
• Determinebusinessgoals• Ar?culaterela?onshiptohumanperformance
Desiredperformancestate
Actualperformancestate
• Knowledge• Mo?ves• PhysicalResources• Structure/Process• Informa?on• Wellness
• Typeofrootcause• Matchinterven?ons• Recommenda?ons
• Managetheproject• Helptheorganiza?ontoadapttothechanges• Gatherforma?veevalua?ondata
• Forma?veevalua?on
• Summa?veevalua?on
BusinessAnalysis CauseAnalysis
PerformanceAnalysis
IntervenGonSelecGon
IntervenGonImplementaGonEvaluaGon
ofResults
Gap
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
ConGnuingperform
anceimprovem
entcustom
erserviceonteam/perform
erlevel• Measurementscurrentsitua?on• Management:desiredsitua?on• Performancegap• Rootcauseanalyses(performancebarriers)• Ac?onplan(solu?ons)
• Insmallteamsimplementa?onac?onplans• Supportmanagementandexternalcoach• Learningonthejob• Addi?onalskills
• Evalua?on• Measurements‐bestandbadprac?ces• Gapclosed?• Addi?onalac?onsrequired• Recommenda?ons
• Addi?onalac?onstaken• Fromprojecttorou?ne
Financial Objectives
Internal Processes
Change & Growth
Voice of the Customer
Vision &
Strategy
Business Results
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Standards,ergonomics
Designprocess(steps)
Outputsperformerclear
func?onali?es/structure
Performancemanagementsystem
Strategy
Processresultsalignedtoclientdemands
process
performer
organiza?on
Knowledge,feedback
Managingwhitespaces
results design management
|©2008|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|June3rd2008|
Barrierscustomerserviceknownbyprofessionalsandprojectorganiza?on?
Visionandgoalscustomerservicecommunicatedinteam?
Bestprac?cescustomerserviceknownbyprofessionalsandprojectorganiza?on?
checklist A Operational management
Customerservicevaluesdeterminedbyteam?
SWOTcustomerserviceteamlevel?
Bestperformersknownbyprofessionals?
Badprac?cescustomerserviceknownbyprofessionalsandprojectorganiza?on?
Jobcriteriacustomerserviceknownbyandvisibleforprofessionals?
Competenciescustomerserviceusedforimprovementandmonitoring?
|©2008|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|June3rd2008|
Currentversus–performancecustomerservicedetermined?
Rootcausesdetermined?
Measurementsysteminusetomonitorcustomerserviceimprovements?
MonitoringindividualimprovementviaHRMcycle?
Peerreviewcustomerserviceinuse?
Customerserviceonagendateammee?ngs?
Ac?onplancustomerserviceknownprofessionalsandprojectorganiza?on(commitment)?
Ac?onplancustomerserviceinac?on?
Checklist B Operational management
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
• Mistakes(2‐3?mesaweek)• Complainscustomersaboutstandardscare(2‐3?mesaweek)
Performancegap
• Unansweredphonecalls10‐15?mesaday
• Customerunsa?sfied:outsideac?vity–10‐10
Performancebarrier
• Unclearstandards• Noformalstandardindocuments• Diversitymaterials
• Responsibili?esunknown• Jobdescrip?onunclear• Infrastructure• Understaffedrecep?oninthemorning
• Insufficientvolunteersavailable• Insufficientresources(wheelchairs)Informa?on
Solu?on
• Learningindeworkplace• Jobaidproducedandintroduced
• Responsibili?esrenewedandcommunicated• Newsecretarialsupporthired
• Wheelchairssponsoredbycommunity• RecruitcampaignforVolunteersProcedureinforma?on
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Solu?on
• Jobaidproducedandintroduced• Learninginworkplace
• Responsibili?esrenewedandcommunicated• Newsecretarialsupporthired
• Wheelchairssponsoredbycommunity• Recruitcampaignforvolunteers
Ac?onplan
Who:3teammemberssubjectmaierexperts
Who• Management• Teammembers
Who• Management• Community• Teammembers
When1‐5‐2008
When:01‐04
When01‐5
• Prepara?onworkgroupprototype• Testandcommitmentteamandmanagement• Writejobaid• Introduc?onteam/learningworkplace• Evalua?on3weeks
• Taskanalysesandobserva?on• Jobdescrip?onsrenewed• Jobdescrip?onscommunicated• Infrastructuralredesign(copier)• Newsecretarialsupporthired
• brainstormteamresourceswheelchairs• wheelchairssponsoredbycommunity• Recruitcampaignforvolunteers(newspaper,family)• Procedureinforma?onduringmorningcare
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
AdaptedfromDonaldKirkpatrick.Evalua6ngTrainingPrograms:TheFourLevels.Berrei‐Koehler,1996.
TrainingEnvironment
WorkEnvironment
Level1:ReacGons
• Learner• Client
Level2:Learning
• Learner• OrganizaGon
LearningEvent
Level3:Behavior
• Learner• OrganizaGon
Level4:Results
• Performance• Financial
Level5:Results
• ROIDr.Phillips
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Solu?ons Level1 Level2 Level3 Level4 Level 5
Managementchecklist
Organiza?onalResults
Solu?onsAc?onPlan
ProjectManagement
Participant satisfaction Management satisfaction
Par?cipantsa?sfac?onManagementsa?sfac?on
Membersa?sfac?on
Coach,problemsolvingskillsresponsibility,asser?veness,
Increasedcommunica?onskills
Focusgroupsperformers,management
Focusgroupsperformers,management
Management,structurendprojects
Workplacemeasurements
AtWorkplace:customersa?sfac?on,organiza?onlevelmeasurements
Costs – benefits financial control
and management
Costs – benefits financial control
and management
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Return-On-Investment percentage (ROI) =
(Total Benefits - Total Costs) …………………… - ……………….
-------------------------------------- x 100 % = ………..... Total Costs
………………
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
“Economic Value Added,” EVA for short, is a measure of ROI that takes the cost of funds into account. Unlike ROI, EVA is an amount, not a ratio. This keeps you focused on overall value. You won’t trade off a project with a 2000% ROI that only yields $10,000 in returns against a project with 30% ROI that nets $850,000.
EVA is not difficult to calculate. Assume you’re making the case for a new program that you expect to return $32,000 for your $200,000 investment in its first year. Your ROI would be 32,000/200,000 = 16%. The EVA for this project deducts the cost of using the $200,000 ( x 10% = $20,000). Your EVA is based on your return less what you must pay for tying up the company’s capital, $32,000 - $20,000 = $12,000. Your EVA ratio is 12,000/200,000 = 6%.
EVA recognizes that there’s no free ride. Projects don’t get funded because they have a hefty ROI. They get funded when they are the best use of funds available. No company can afford to pursue all its upside opportunities.
EVA gets everyone thinking like owners. The carrying cost of excess inventory gripes the manager who’d like to use those funds for a new project.
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Financial Objectives
Internal Processes
Change & Growth
Voice of the Customer
Vision &
Strategy
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
RSSTagsBlogsVlogsPodcastVodcastYoutubeGoogleWikisBlikis
SocialnetworksScreencastMashupsTwiger
E‐learningWikipedia
EPSSGamesE‐mail
BestpracGces/performers
ReflecGon
Networking
PeerTeaching/reviewing
Theory
PracGce
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220
Theyfocusonperformanceinsteadoftraining
Theydon’tconfusee‐learningwithweb2.0/socialsonware
Theydon’tseparateformalandInformallearning
Theydon’tseparateworkandtraining
©2009|JosArets|VivianHeijnen|LeiOrtmans|TU220