SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2013 The information contained in this document is confidential and restricted, and is to be used only for the purposes established in the document. No modification, exploitation, reproduction, communication to any third party, dissemination or distribution of the whole or any part of the document is permitted without the prior written consent of SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas, S.A.. Failure to respond to any request for such consent shall in no way be construed as authorization for use. PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY AND MASTER PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF BIJWASAN NEW DELHI RAILWAY STATION OF THE INDIAN RAILWAY NETWORK KD4 – FINAL CONCEPT, MASTER PLAN AND FEASIBILITY REPORT (COMPLETE) WWW.SENER.ES
212
Embed
preparation of technical feasibility study and master plan for ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2013
The information contained in this document is confidential and restricted, and is to be used only for the purposes established in the document. No modification, exploitation, reproduction, communication to any third party, dissemination or distribution of the whole or any part of the document is permitted without the prior written consent of SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas, S.A.. Failure to respond to any request for such consent shall in no way be construed as authorization for use.
PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY AND MASTER PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF BIJWASAN NEW DELHI RAILWAY STATION OF THE INDIAN RAILWAY NETWORK
KD4 – FINAL CONCEPT, MASTER PLAN AND FEASIBILITY REPORT (COMPLETE)
WWW.SENER.ES
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 2 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Signature Control
Written Reviewed Approved
Juan Francisco Paz Juan Fernández Aller Juan Francisco Paz
María Ugarte José Manuel Almoguera
José Manuel Almoguera María Ugarte
Osvaldo Gandini
Patricia Díaz
Ernesto Sánchez Larios
Rohit Kumar
Sandip Kumar
Krishna Choudhary
K. Vineela
Gaurav Wahi
February 2017 February 2017 February 2017
Date and Signature Date and Signature Date and Signature
Changes Record
Rev Date Author Affected section Changes
0 13/09/2013 Juan Francisco Paz Modified submission
1 15/07/2016 Juan Francisco Paz Modified submission
2 11/11/2016 Juan Francisco Paz Modified submission
3 10/02/2017 Juan Francisco Paz Modified submission
Addition of New Chapters and Section
Chapter 11 - Environmental Impact Assessment
Chapter 13 - Risk Analysis and Mitigation.
Section 8.8 - Block working of Railways
Addition of New Drawings
Master Plan Zoning (BWSN-MP-KD4-ARC-PLN-103)
Master Plan Phase-1 Station Area (BWSN-MP-KD4-ARC-PLN-104)
Master Plan Phase-1 Rag picking Zone (BWSN-MP-KD4-ARC-PLN-105)
Central Data Controller Scheme (BWSN-RS-KD4-COM-SKM-001)
Addition of 3D Views for Phase-1 and Phase-2 Development
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 3 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Figure 1: Directional Terminal in MPD-2021
Bijwasan is presently a suburban station and is located located on Delhi-Rewari section of Delhi
Division, NR. It lies at Km 24.365 from Delhi. Adjoining stations are Palam, towards Delhi 6.52
Km away and Gurgaon, 6.89 Km towards Rewari. There is also a passenger halt between Bijwasan
and Palam at Shahabad Mohammadpur, 3 Km away. Figure n°
Bijwasan is lying within the proposed development of Dwarka subcity, it is flanked by residential
area/built up area on its north, west and north-west, the Delhi-Rewari line is on its east, Bijwasan
road on its south and a 6-lane road running through the proposed site connecting to the National
Highway 8 (NH8), which is about 5 km east of the site. Villages like Bagdola on the north and
Bhartal on the south west side are also surrounding the station area. A railway map of Delhi area
is shown below.
Figure 2: Railway Map of Delhi
Delhi development Authority (DDA) has earmarked land near this station for development of
directional terminal which has been acquired by the railway. NR has been planning to develop a
coaching terminal at Bijwasan to deal with the trains coming from South West direction.
Ministry of Railways (MOR) has decided to develop/redevelop certain identified railway stations
across India through a Special Purpose Vehicle named as ‘Indian Railway Stations Development
Corporation Limited’ (IRSDC). One of them is Bijwasan.
IRSDC has awarded the joint venture formed by SENER and BARSYL with the contract “Architect
and Technical Consultant for development/redevelopment of Bijwasan-New Delhi Railway
station on Indian Railway network”.
SENER and BARSYL are multinational companies and leaders in Railways and other Civil Projects
around the world. While SENER has been associated with large number of Railway/Metro and
High Speed Railway Projects in Spain and Latin America, BARSYL sums the ability, the territory
and local characteristics knowledge, since they are an Indian company and have carried out a
number of Metro and railway related consultancies in India and abroad.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 18 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The contract was signed on 4th March 2013.
2.2 Purpose of this Report
This report forms the first part of deliverable for Key Date 04, as outlined in the Terms of
Reference of the contract. It summarizes all the previously submitted deliverables under the
contract. In summary these are:
KD1: Inception Report and Quality Assurance Plan
KD2: Traffic Planning Report (TPR), Infrastructure Development Report (IDR), Land
Redevelopment Report (LRR), and Geotechnical Investigation Report (GIR)
KD3: Draft Concept Plan and Feasibility Report
KD4 : Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report
The purpose of this document is to present the final Concept Plan, Master Plan and Feasibility
Study to develop the new Bijwasan station as a World Class one, together with the whole
surrounding area, implementing new uses that can help from the financial point of view to make
the proposal feasible.
This document, called Final Concept, Master Plan & Feasibility Report, develops the called
Option 1, which was selected in the previous stage of this Consultancy for developing the area
and the Railway Station building. The inputs received have been considered for this submission.
KD4 (Part 1 of 2) was submitted for statutory approval. Consequently, the various comments
received from IRSDC and Northern Railways, the impact from revised yard plan from Northern
Railways and changes during design development have been incorporated in the present KD4
(Complete), which includes Preliminary Drawings, Output Specifications, Design Calculations,
Costs & Revenue for the project.
2.3 Structure of this Report
This report has been structured to present the feasibility of all the aspects of related to the
development of a world class station. The structure of this report is as follows:
Chapter 2 of the report provides an introduction about the project background,
provides an insight into the purpose and structure of the report and project objectives.
Also, provides developed planning and studies including development control norms
and project financial feasibility.
Chapter 3 of the report summarizes the outputs of the station user surveys and the
passenger simulation. This chapter analyses how the station is being used by the
passengers and explains the constraints in the usage of the existing station and provide
recommendation for improvements.
Chapter 4 of the report reviews the capacity of the yard and the railway systems
infrastructure such as track work, signaling & telecom, overhead line (OHE) and other
railway systems infrastructure that are fundamental for continue and safe operation
of the railway. The condition of existing railway assets are discussed and
recommendations outlined to enable redevelopment of the station to World class
Station taking in consideration the increase in train traffic throughput at Bijwasan
Station.
In Chapter 5 of the report the functional performance of the proposed station is
analyzed, and recommendations for improvements in mobility in the area are
discussed.
Chapter 6 of the report summarizes the overall master planning of the station
development area, focusing on commercial development.
Chapter 7 of the report summarizes the Structural & Geotechnical concepts used to
design the proposed station building.
Chapter 8 of the report summaries the construction methodology and plan envisaged
for the construction of the proposed station building, taking in consideration the
relocation of structures, road diversion and passenger movement during the
construction period.
Chapter 9 of the report includes the approach to the utilities and infrastructure around
the railway land and outlines improvements necessary to serve the new station and its
surrounding.
In Chapter 10 of the report the existing road network around the station area is
reviewed, the impact of the proposed new development on the surrounding road traffic
is analyzed.
In Chapter 11 of the report, the capital expenditure or the fund/ investment required
by the company/ developer to develop the station and its infrastructure including site
development has been discussed.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 19 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
2.4 Master Plan Main Objectives
The objective of this consultancy is to undertake Technical Feasibility Study and Prepare a Master
& Concept Plan of new Bijwasan Railway Station for the development and construction of the
Project Railway Station and Project Facilities, and enabling the prospective developers to assess
IRSDC’s requirements in a clear and predictable manner through the management of Request of
Technical proposal with a view to ensuring:
a) Segregation of arrival/departure passenger movement and circulation at the Railway
Station
b) Safe and comfortable world class passenger services, with maximum possible modern
amenities in a clean and pleasing ambiance;
c) Superior road connectivity with the city for quick and easy access to the Project Railway
Station and adequate parking within the station premises, efficient multi-modal
interface, providing flexibility for integration facilities with future transport
infrastructure;
d) Superior train operation (including allied services e.g. parcel, posts etc.) and
maintenance facilities affording greater flexibility and enhanced operational efficiency
for Indian Railways;
e) Smooth arrival/departure and movement of pedestrians, passenger vehicles, parcel,
luggage, linen & catering material etc. within and around station premises, state of the
art passenger information and display systems, security systems and fire safety systems
etc.
f) Providing user-friendly facilities and passenger services and passenger services for the
convenience of common/unfamiliar passengers;
g) Special amenities and services for the old, infirm and physically challenged passengers;
h) Employing leading edge technologies and design innovative services and solutions;
i) Integrated development with the surrounding city and creation of an iconic urban
infrastructure and architecturally distinctive gateway to the city;
j) Least possible inconvenience to passengers, road commuters and residents during
construction
k) Adequate and coherent commercial development at and around the station for an
optimal financing model and attainment of the above public policy goals based on life-
cycle cost minimization approach
l) Harmonious and complementary co-existence of the railway terminal and the real estate
proposed to be developed.
m) The Project to be executed as a Green Building Project and therefore environment
factors to be given very high priority.
As a summary, the main objective of this Master Plan is to create an area that will be a reference
for the new development of Delhi.
2.5 Developed Planning & Studies
The two main documents that have been considered for designing new Bijwasan World Class
Station and its surrounding Area are:
Master Plan for Delhi 2021(Delhi Development Authority, 2009)
“Inception Report. Development of Bijwasan as a World Class Station” (Northern
Railways, 2010).
These documents establish most of the requirements to be considered in this report and Master
plan studies.
2.5.1 Development Control Norms
2.5.1.1 General
Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Floor Space Ratio (FSR), Floor Space Index (FSI), site ratio and plot ratio
are all terms for the ratio of a building´s total floor area to the size of the piece of land upon
which it is built. The terms can also refer to limits imposed on such a ratio. As a formula: Floor
area ratio=total covered area on all floors of all buildings on a certain plot/area of the plot.
The permissible FAR on Site is 100. However we have achieved 84 FAR on the complete master
plan development. However the phase 1 master plan utilizes only 30 FAR. The height restrictions
are regulated as per AAI norms as the station building falls under the air funnel. This was also
the prime factor, for designing the station building eccentric to the platform. The master plan
approval for transportation and circulation as received from UTTIPEC and the subsequent
approval from DUAC (vide letter no. 27 (01) 2016-DUAC Code 10051627001) is based on an FAR
of 100.
The development of Delhi is governed by the Master Plan of Delhi-2021 (MPD 2021). It was notified
by the Central Government under the Delhi Development Act 1957 on 1/8/90, shows that the
National Capital Territory of Delhi is divided into 15 zones, out of which 8 zones (A-H) are in
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 20 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
urban Delhi, 6 zones (J to N&P) are in urban extension /rural area. Zone-O is for River Yamuna
(River Front Area). A zone could be divided into sub-zones.
Future Bijwasan Railway Station falls under Dwarka sub-city, which belongs to zone-K and forms
part of the urban extension plan approved by the Authority vide Agenda no.79 dt. 30.06.1987 as
part of Master Plan of Delhi 2001.
The existing Land use of the surrounding area is primarily Residential (villages like Bagdola,
Bhartal, Bijwasan and Dwarka subcity), Industrial (proposed integrated freight complexes) and
Transportation (proposed ISBT Dwarka).
The urban extension plan was prepared to accommodate the projected population and was
conceived to be developed in four phases. Dwarka sub-city forms part of Phase 1A of the urban
extension plan. The Area where this Master Plan is developed is in the zone called K-II, as shown
in the next page. Railway Station is clearly been demarcated as a MPT.
Under Chapter 12.0 Transportation, (12.01.1 Rail), 5 directional Metropolitan Passenger
Terminals (MPT) has been proposed to clear the central area. Bhartal in Dwarka, South-West
Delhi, is the second in this list and is the same as is called Bijwasan in this document.
Figure 3: Planning Zone K-II
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 21 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Figure 4: Bijwasan Existing Conditions
Though the MPT talks about TOD along MRTS corridor, with enhanced FAR in case of integrated
schemes, it is largely silent on the development controls for MPT´s
The Master Plan of Delhi is currently under revision. Meanwhile some other studies are being
developed:
Figure 5: New Developments Planned in the Area including New Dwarka-Gurgaon Highway
2.5.1.2 Development Controls
The development control guidelines as per MPD 2021 for a railway station are described in the
table below:
S. no Use premises Activities permitted
Development controls
Area under
operation (%)
Area under
building (%)
FAR*
Floor area that can be utilised for passenger accomodation
1.
Rail
terminal/integra
ted passenger
terminal
All facilities related to
railway passengers,
operations, goods
handling, passengers
change over facilities,
including watch and
ward, hotel.
70 30 100 15%
Note: the FAR is to be calculated on the building plot
Other examples of FSIs in other stations developments in India and all over the world are:
Station name Site area (Ha) Built-up area (m2) FSI
Seawood Darave, Navi Mumbai 16.5 2,32,257 1.5
New Delhi Railway station 84.7 11,00,000 1.3 (proposed)
New Guangzhou station (China) 25.4 495,900 1.95
Kowloon station (Hong-Kong) 13.5 220,000 1.62
King Cross station (London, UK) 6 80,000 1.33
Table 1: Other examples of FSI in Stations
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 22 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
2.5.1.3 FSI in various cities
Some examples of FAR in various cities of the world are:
City FSI Notes
Mumbai Ranges from 1 to 4 Higher in some zones in order to
spur slum redevelopment
Seoul 8 in general, up to 10 in Central Business District (CBD)
In residential areas it ranges from 0.5 to 4
Higher FSI are permitted in the
vicinity of metro stations
New York -
Manhattan
In Manhattan 10 along main avenues, up to 15 in Central
Business District (CBD)
In residential areas it ranges from 0.6 in the suburbs to 10
in Manhattan, next to CBDs 4
Manhattan is the main borough of
the 5 in which NYC is divided
Singapore In CBD it ranges from 8 to 25.
From 1.5 to 4 in majority of residential areas, up to 6 in
the proximity of CBD
Probably the highest in the world,
together with Hong Kong, prob
Table 2: FAR in various Cities of the World
2.5.1.4 FAR in Delhi
FAR in Delhi depends on land use, not on location. As per MPD-2021, the FAR according to the
various uses is tabulated.
2.5.1.5 Consumed FSI at Site
The consumed FSI has been calculated based on the Built-up area, which is 14,53,920 m2
TOTAL GROSS PLOT AREA 15,40,929
TOTAL NET PLOT AREA 14,53,920
FAR SCENARIO 1 (1)
TOTAL PLOT AREA 14,53,920
FLOOR AREA UNDER OPERATION 10,17,744
(70% )
FLOOR AREA UNDER BUILDING 4,36,176
(30%)
FLOOR AREA PASSENGER ACCOMMODATION 2,18,088
(15%)
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA 14,53,920
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA (RAILWAYS) 2,31,576
BUILT UP AREA MIXED USES (PHASE-1) 3,99,579
Built Up Area from Multilevel Parking (25%*14405) 3,601
BUILT UP AREA MIXED USES (PHASE-2) 7,03,615
Table 3: FSI and Built-up Area on Site
Note that the total built up area for Railways include not only the station and platform, but the
Railways facilities and Railways housing.
The Multilevel Parking for the station is being developed in phase-2 has an area of 14,405 m2, as
per the chapter 12.13.7 from the MPD 2021 permit to increase the built up area based on 25% of
its gross floor area. The total built up area that is considerate for mixed uses is 11,03,194 m2.
2.5.1.6 Parking standards
MPD-2021 describes the parking standards depending on use premises:
Use premises Permissible Equivalent Car Spaces (ECS) per 100m2 of Floor Area
Residential 2.0
Commercial 3.0
Manufacturing 2.0
Government 1.8
Public and Semi Public facilities 2.0
Table 4: Master Plan of Delhi 2021 - Parking Standards
2.5.1.7 Permissible development based on the Development Control Guidelines for Railway
stations
For the purpose of calculating FAR, a global FAR is considered for the total Site of 14,53,920 m2
2.5.1.8 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) policy
The MPD‐2021 targeted 80‐20 modal shift in favour of public transportation. To help achieve this
target the UNIFIED TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE (PLANNING &
ENGINEERING) CENTRE (UTTIPEC) was set up by Delhi Development Authority. Its view is to
enhance mobility, reduce congestion and to promote traffic safety by adopting standard
transport planning practices, capacity building, enforcement measures, road safety audits,
traffic engineering practices and better organizational co-ordination for improved traffic
management by efficient lane capacity and work zone management, utilities coordination,
developing traffic culture and avoiding transport planning pitfalls in the National Capital
Territory of Delhi,
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 23 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
As per the notification, all transportation projects/transport engineering solutions in Delhi by
any agency having road engineering/infrastructure implication would require clearance of the
centre (UTTIPEC). This would ensure the latest technology and research finding support is
available to all new roads and projects
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) has been set up by UTTIPEC. It is essentially any
development – macro or micro – that induces people to prefer the use of public transportation.
The Primary Goals of TOD are to:
Reduce private vehicle dependency and induce public transport use – through design,
policy & enforcement measures.
Provide PT access to the maximum number of people through densification and
enhanced connectivity.
Transit‐Oriented Development (TOD) is generally characterized by compact, mixed use
development near new or existing public transportation infrastructure that provides housing,
employment, entertainment and civic functions within walking distance of transit. Pedestrian‐
oriented design features of TODs are essential to encourage residents and workers to drive their
cars less and ride public transit more.
TOD can also be a significant source of non‐farebox revenue for the participating transport
agency.
Under the Gazette of India notification dated 14 July, 2015 broad development controls norms
have been framed for TOD. The following development control norms shall apply FAR and Density
a. TOD norms of FAR and density may be availed through the preparation and approval of
comprehensive integrated scheme of minimum size 1 Ha, with maximum ground
coverage of 40%. In case of MRTS/Government Agencies, the minimum plot size for
development shall be 3000 sq.m, but all other development norms apply as per this
Chapter.
b. Cluster Block approval may be given to DE for a minimum area of 3000 sq. m only if an
approved influence zone plan or integrated scheme for the area exists.
c. For any integrated scheme, a max. FAR of 400 and a maximum density of 2000 persons
per hectare (PPH) is permissible. The entire amalgamated plot will be considered for
calculating the FAR and density. FAR utilization shall not be less than 400. Mandatory
EWS FAR of 15% over and above the maximum permissible FAR shall be applicable.
Additional FAR may be availed through TDR only, for schemes larger than 1 Ha.
d. All residents residing in that scheme area shall have to be accommodated within the
same scheme only, with no induced displacement of existing residential population.
Mix of Uses
In all integrated schemes, a minimum of 30% of overall FAR shall be mandatory for Residential
use, a minimum 10% of FAR for commercial use and minimum 10% of FAR for community facilities.
Mix of uses and FAR utilization for the remaining 50% FAR shall be as per the land use category
designated in the Zonal Plan.
Indicative FAR utilization and mix of uses for Transportation falling within TOD Zone
Landuse as per ZDP (At Least 50% of total
FAR to be as per ZDP Use)
Indicative Mix of Uses within FAR Utilization
Minimum Residential*
Minimum Commercial**
Minimum Facilities** Indicative Mix of Uses within remaining
50% FAR, as per ZDP landuse
TRANSPORTATION 30% 10% 10% Remaining 50% of FAR may be for any use after meeting all operational requirements for transportation facilities.
Notes: *1. The mandatory residential component shall comprise of 50% units of size ranging between 32-40 sq.m. and the balance 50% comprising of homes ≤a65 sq.m. EWS FAR of 15% over and above the permissible FAR will be applicable. **2. The mandatory facilities and commercial component shall include the requirements of the residential population in that land parcel. 3. DMRC/RRTS/Railways (MRTS) to be exempted from providing the minimum 30% Residential component which is part of the TOD norms applicable to all other DE. In case residential is provided in MRTS projects, the mix of dwelling unit sizes (for middle income group) may not be made applicable to DMRC/RRTS/Railways. Minimum scheme area for development to be relaxed to 3000 sq.m. for DMRC/RRTS/Railways (MRTS) agencies.
Note: These are draft regulations of the TOD policy which are under Gazette of India notification
for public objection/ suggestion. These are not entirely considered in the project till the time
being it gets fully functional and implemented by GOI.
2.5.2 Proposed Master Plan from Northern Railways in 2014
Works planned initially by Northern Railways at Bijwasan are explained in the following
paragraphs.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 24 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The work of land acquisition for development of Bijwasan terminal at BWSN was sanctioned in
Works Programme item no.2016-17. The estimated cost for this work was for Rs.216.87 crores.
Land measuring 122.98 ha was earmarked by DDA for Northern Railway, out of this 110.07 ha was
acquired from DDA under this work. However, according to the land survey demarcation 109.57
ha of plot is only established at ground for development as Taj Vivanta Hotel and DMRC depot
may have occupied some part of the plot. Remaining 12.91ha is under litigation between DDA &
occupants and will take time for acquisition. In addition to this approximately 22.90 ha of land
abutting this plot under existing main line will also be available for development. Contract for
providing boundary wall for protection of land has been awarded and the work is under progress.
Approximately 12.91 ha of land is currently inhabited by village, farmhouses, school, cremation
ground, grave yard etc., which is yet to be handed over by DDA to NR. The location of these plots
is critical and will affect optimum planning of station and yard if not handed over.
The work of “Provision of coaching/freight handling terminal at Bijwasan was sanctioned in the
year 2016-17 with an abstract cost of 91.97 crores. A tentative concept plan prepared by
DyCE(C), Tilak Bridge for development at Bijwasan provided for:
a) Proposed facility in phase 1
3 no. island platform (620 m each)
4 no. washing cum stabling lines (3 nos. 660 m & one 700m)
2 no. Loco stabling line (106m &178m each)
Over run lines (120 m each)
2 shunting neck (620 m)
4 sick lines spur (2 nos 628m, 620m & 636meach)
Station Building and Circulating area
7 passenger lines & common center lines (724 m, 715m,704m, 702m, 736m, 877m &
750m each)
b) Proposed facility in phase 2
3 passenger lines & common center lines (720 m, 806m, 660m each)
1 no. island platform (620 m each)
The proposed yard plan made by Northern Railways in 2014 is shown in Fig. no. 6:
Figure 6: Track Yard Proposed by Northern Railways in Inception Report from 2014
Drawing no. BWSN-TL-KD4-ARC-PLN-100 of this report contains this track layout.
i. The terminal is proposed to be planned for horizon year 2053 only for handling passenger.
ii. Area is to be earmarked for commercial development to enable financing of proposed
terminal.
iii. The development is planned in two phases.
A Road over bridge in lieu of level crossing No.21, in south of the existing BWSN station on the
Delhi –Rewari main is currently under construction, amounting to Rs.59.3 crores. Expenditure up
to march is 20.43 Cr and allotment for 2016-17 is 1.0 Cr.
The existing provision of MPD 2021 would require modifications with respect to permitted use
premise, ground coverage, floor area ratio (FAR) and parking norms. Northern Railways Report
already proposed some modifications to MPD 2021 determinations, in terms of land uses, ground
coverage, floor area ratio (FAR) and parking standards. This proposal was submitted to DDA, duly
approved by GM/NR. The letter sent in this regard is enclosed at Annexure 8 of this document,
called “Communication with DDA”.
Northern Railways (NR) has addressed a letter to Delhi Development Authority regarding the
development of the area. The letter sent can also be found in Annexure 8.
2.5.3 Financial Feasibility Study of Bijwasan
Subject Site lies in Bijwasan along the Delhi – Rewari Railway line. It is located in South-West
Delhi. The figure below provides an indicative location of the subject site within Delhi-NCR:
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 25 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Figure 7: Indicative Location of the Site
The details of the site and location aspects have already been covered in detail in the initial
write-ups.
2.5.3.1 Land Use Implications
The World Class stations also envision a transit-oriented development (TOD) which is a mixed-
use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transport and
incorporates features to encourage transit ridership. A TOD neighbourhood typically has a center
with a train station, metro station, tram stop, or bus stop, surrounded by relatively high-density
development with progressively lower-density developments spreading outwards from the
center. TODs generally are located within a radius of one-quarter to one-half mile (400 to 800
m) from a transit stop, as this is considered to be an appropriate scale for pedestrians.
The Master Plan of Delhi 2021, also has a clear thrust for Transit oriented Development and
provides for the higher FAR in influence zone of MRTS corridors. Para 12.0 of MPD2021, lays a
clear emphasis on providing a significant increase in efficient rapid public transport system and
facilities with a corresponding reduction in individual private transport usage.
At present Master Plan of Delhi (MPD) 2021 has common Development Control Norms for Railway
Terminals, Integrated Passenger Terminals or Metropolitan Passenger Terminals. The concept
and requirements of a World Class Station for IPT & MPT, are however, not fully met in the
Development Control Norms provided for them in Master Plan of Delhi 2021.
It is assumed that the real estate component within the subject site is developed under the
applicable development norms under the current land use assigned for the subject site. The
following table, as per the provisions on development controls norms mentioned in Chapter 12
of the Delhi Master Plan 2021 highlights the development norms applicable under the scenario.
The real estate component shall comprise of the FAR that can be used for passenger
accommodation and commercial use.
Land Use Activities Permitted Development Controls
Rail Terminal/ Integrated
Passenger
Terminal Metropolitan.
Passenger Terminal
All facilities related to Railway
passengers, operations, goods
handling, passengers change over
facilities, including watch & ward,
Hotel
Area Under Operation - 70%
Area Under Building - 30%
FAR – 100
FAR that can be used for
Passenger Accommodation –
15%
Table 5: Master Plan of Delhi 2021 - FAR on Site
Further, it is assumed that the land shall be provided on a 45 year lease period to private
developers for development.
Cost of Station building development is approximately INR 384.75 Crores (Refer Preliminary
Estimate for Bijwasan Railway Station, New Delhi, Revision 12).
As per the current land use plan, interpretation of the area under buildings precedents of other
transport projects in the contiguous area may be referred. The area under buildings is
interpreted as any development which is not needed for “operations”. For example in ISBT of
(Anand Vihar) New Delhi this 30% has been earmarked for hotels. However under Railway stations
only 15% is allowed for passenger accommodations, i.e. hotels and the remaining 15% is for any
other development other than hotels or operational use. This 15% could be commercial
development which will support the development of a railway station.
2.5.3.2 Key Financial Indicators
It is anticipated that with the current market trends and the present land use, the land premium
can be availed with a FSI value of INR 2,054 per sq. ft approximately for Phase-1 commercial
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 26 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
development and for Phase-2 with a the FSI value of INR 1,121 approximately (for details refer
Report - Real Estate Market Scan and Potential Development Typology Determination for Site
Located at Bijwasan, New Delhi). Therefore to meet the objectives of the station development
change in land use is not warranted.
However Railways can further enhance their revenue from this piece of real estate by changing
the land use to commercial.
Proposed real estate development components
Retail Mall Development
Commercial Development – Office space
Hospitality Development - Hotels
Area Statement – Phase I and II
The table below lists the details of development at the Subject Property under Phase 1 and
Phase 2:
Particulars Unit Area
Property Development for Phase 1 Sq. ft. 4,301,070
Property Development for Phase 2 Sq. ft. 7,573,715
Total Area Sq. ft. 11,874,785
Product Mix for Phase I
Table below lists the proposed product mix at the subject development under Phase I
Proposed Product Mix Distribution Built up Area (sq ft)
Hotel 215,054
Retail Development 408,602
Commercial Development – office space 3,677,415
Total Development under Phase I 4,301,070
Development Assumptions – Hospitality
Table below lists the key development assumptions for hotel development at the subject
property:
Construction Cost
Construction Cost Per unit cost (per sq. ft) Area Cost (in INR)
Base construction cost 3,000 215,054 645,160,560
Hotel construction and interiors 4,500 215,054 967,740,840
Total Construction Cost 1,612,901,400
Total Cost per room 4,500,000
Summation of Cashflows
The table below lists the summary of cashflows that the subject development will generate
over a 45 year period.
Particulars Total
Cash Outflows (INR Mn)
Land Cost 12,629
Development Costs, Other Exps 19,734
Operating Exps 132,414
Total Cash outflows 164,777
Cash Inflows (INR Mn)
Revenues from Hotel / Serviced Suites 243,824
Large Format Retail and Commercial Development 729,170
Total Cash inflows 972,994
Net Cashflows 808,217
Project IRR 22.5%
FSI value (INR / sq.ft) 2,054
The net cashflows generated from the subject property during a 45 year period is INR 808,217
Mn. IRR generated by the project is 22.5%.
Product Mix for Phase II
Table below lists the proposed product mix at the subject development under Phase II
Proposed Product Mix Distribution Built up Area (sq ft)
Hotel 378,686
Retail Development 719,503
Commercial Development – office space 6,475,526
Total Development under Phase II 7,573,715
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 27 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Development Assumptions – Hospitality
Table below lists the key development assumptions for hotel development at the subject
property:
Construction Cost
Construction Cost Per unit cost (per sq. ft) Area Cost (in INR)
Base construction cost 3,000 378,686 1,136,057,215
Hotel construction and interiors 4,500 378,686 1,704,085,822
Total Construction Cost 2,840,143,037
Total Cost per room 4,500,000
Summation of Cashflows
The table below lists the summary of cashflows that the subject development will generate
over a 45 year period.
Particulars Total
Cash Outflows (INR Mn)
Land Cost 12,136
Development Costs, Other Exps 35,128
Operating Exps 246,046
Total Cash outflows 293,311
Cash Inflows (INR Mn)
Revenues from Hotel / Serviced Suites 455,376
Large Format Retail and Commercial Development 1,232,239
Total Cash inflows 1,687,614
Net Cashflows 1,394,303
Project IRR 22.5%
FSI value (INR / sq.ft) 1,121
The net cashflows generated from the subject property during a 45 year period is INR 1,394,303
Mn. IRR generated by the project is 22.5%.
Detailed Cost Calculations and Financial Feasibility Analysis are provided in separate reports
‘Preliminary Estimate for Bijwasan Railway Station and Real Estate Market Scan and Potential
Development Typology Determination for Site Located at Bijwasan, New Delhi’. The Preliminary
Drawings are included in this report and Specifications is provides in a separate report.
2.6 Clearances
All the proposals for public works must be prepared as per specific requirements of Client
Ministries / Departments and the residential and office space norms prescribed by the
Government. The proposals must comply with the local master plan, zoning regulations and
building byelaws and environment regulations. All the proposals must include provisions for
barrier free movement for physically challenged people i.e. providing non-handicapping built
environment for differently-abled people. The proposal must also conform to the regulations
pertaining to fire-protections, fire detection and fire-fighting as per National Building Code and
local fire office. All the public buildings must include provisions for green building environment
(complying with requirements of at least three star rating). Apart from obtaining conceptual
and administrative approval from the clients, financial approval/ expenditure sanction from the
competent authority in Government, the proposal should have all the requisite local approvals,
clearances, NOCs etc. before start of construction.
As per Delhi Master Plan (MPD) 2021, the list of various local approvals and clearances required
for construction of a large scale project in Delhi -such as Bijwasan station- as compiled by CPWD
is given below:
(A) PROJECT FEASILIBILITY/ PRE-SANCTION STAGE:
(A.1) APPROVALS FROM DDA
(A.1.1)* Land use plan approval for the plot is required from Delhi Development Authority (DDA)
and the Ministry of UD, when the land use is shown as Government land in the Master Plan of
Delhi (MPD-2021). The land use plan for land area is to be notified by the Ministry of UD after
the same is approved by DDA.
(A.1.2)* Approval for change in land use of the plot is required from DDA and the Ministry of UD
when the land use shown in MPD-2021/Zonal Plan (where the plot is located)/land allotment
letter is to be changed (as the same is not permitted / not compatible with MPD-2021/Zonal
Plan). The land use plan for land area is to be notified by the Ministry of UD after the same is
approved by DDA.
(A.1.3)* Relaxation in respect of density/ground coverage / FAR / setbacks / height prescribed
in MPD=2021 is required from DDA and the Ministry of UD for public works / projects of National
Importance.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 28 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
(A.2) APPROVAL FROM AIRPORT AUTHORITYY OF INDIA
(A.2.1)* No Objection Certificate (legal document) is required for height clearance of buildings
/ structures Masts from the Directorate of Air Traffic Management, Airport Authority of India
(AAI), when the project lies within 20 km radius of the air strips / funnel.
(A.3) APPROVAL FROM L&DO
(A.3.1)* No Objection Certificate is required from L&DO when the land is leasehold, owned by
L&DO and no construction was undertaken within the time limit stipulated in the allotment
letter.
(B) SANCTION STAGE – LAYOUT PLAN / LOCAL AREA PLAN /URBAN DESIGN PLAN (for large
scale / multi-building proposals)
(B.1) APPROVAL FROM NATIONAL MONUMENT AUTHORITY
(B.1.1)* No Objection Certificate is required from the National Monument Authority (MNA)/
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) when the entire project site or part/s of it is within 300 mtr.
radius from the declared boundary of any monument project under Ancient Monument Act and
is under the control of ASI.
(B.2) APPROVAL FROM FOREST DEPARTMENT
(B.2.1)*Approval is required from the Forest Department, GNCTD when there is a proposal for
tree cutting / felling and transplantation at the site.
(B.3) APPROVAL FROM DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION
(B.3.1)* NOC is required from the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) when the project site is
along or on the metro alignment or lies within 20 mtr. on either side of the metro alignment /
MRTS corridor (outer line of a metro line / structure)
(B.4) APPROVAL FROM GNCTD
(B.4.1)* NOC is required from the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD)
when the project site is 500 m on either sides of Major Surface Transport Corridor like BRTS.
(B.5) APPROVAL FROM ROAD OWNING AGENCY
(B.5.1)* NOC is required from the Road Owning Agency (MCD, Delhi PWD, NDMC, DDA) when
cutting of footpath or road or service lane or right of way (ROW) is involved.
(B.6) APPROVAL FROM TRAFFIC POLICE
(B.6.1)* NOC is required from the Delhi Traffic Police when the proposal involves disruption of
general traffic movement / circulation pattern temporarily or permanently during and after the
construction of the project.
(B.7) APPROVAL FROM UTTIPEC
(B.7.1)* Clearance is required from the Unified Traffic & Transportation Infrastructure (Planning
& Engineering) Centre of DDA for all transportation projects, transport engineering solutions in
Delhi by any agency having road engineering /infrastructure implication.
(B.8) APPROVAL FROM CHIEF FIRE OFFICER
(B.8.1) Approval / Fire Safety Certificate is required from Chief Fire Officer (CFO) / Director,
Delhi Fire Service for the proposals at layout plan stage as stipulated in the Delhi building byelaws
and National Building Code (NBC)
(B.9) APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FROM DELHI URBAN ART COMMISSION (DUAC) for the proposals as
layout plan stage as stipulated in the DUAC Act.
(B.10)* ENVIRONMENT CLERANCE IS REQUIRED FROM MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS (MEF)
/ State level expert committee for all buildings / construction projects having built up area more
than 20,000 sq. m and area development projects / townships covering an area more than 50
hectare or built up area more than 1,50,000 sq. m
(C) SANCTION / BUILDING PERMIT STAGE
(C.1) APPROVAL FROM LOCAL BODY
(C.1.1) Approval is required from the local body / authority (DDA/ MCD/ NDMC) for sanction of
building plans / building permit under the provisions of Delhi Building byelaws, Master Plan of
Delhi and Local Body Acts. The local body forwards the proposals to the various other concerned
authorities (as mentioned above at S. No. B.2.1) in the city as required for issue of case specific
proposal / NOC before granting building permit.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 29 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
(C.2) APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FROM THE POWER DISTRIBUTING SUPPLY AGENCY (NDMC / BSES /
NDPL)
(C.2.1) Approval is required from the Power distributing / supply agency (NDMC / BSES / NDPL)
for sanction of electrical load and requirement for the electrical substation and provision of
transformers. The temporary construction of power supply needs to be obtained from the
concerned authority before start of construction.
(C.3) APPROVAL / NOC / ASSURANCE IS REQUIRED FROM THE WATER SUPPLY AGENCY (NDMC for
NDMC area / DJB for rest of Delhi)
(C.5.1) Approval /NOC / Assurance is required from the water supply agency for NDMC area/ DJB
for rest of Delhi) for uninterrupted water supply, drainage and sewerage connections. The
temporary connection for water supply needs to be obtained from the concerned authority
before start of the construction.
(D) CONSTRUCTION STAGE
(D.1) PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FROM THE CENTRAL GROUND WATER AUTHORITY (CGWA)
(D.1.1) Permission is required from the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) to obstruct
ground water permission to obstruct ground water through any energize means i.e. for digging /
installation of a bore well water connection in the site for taking water in a notified /non-notified
area for household / industrial / infrastructure projects as per guide lines dated 15.11.12 under
Environmental Protection Act (EPA) (1986).
(D.2) INTIMATION TO THE LOCAL AUTHORITY (DDA / NDMC / MCD)
(D.2.1) The owner / applicant who has been granted a building permit shall intimate the local
authority (DDA/ NDMC / MCD) in writing before seven days of starting of construction work at
site in the prescribed form (Form-III, Appendix B, Byelaw No.7.2.1). An acknowledgement needs
to be obtained from the Authority of this notice.
(D.3) PLINTH LEVEL NOTICE
(D.3.1) Plinth Level Notice (information of completion of work up to plinth level in the prescribed
forms along with requisite documents, fee and charges mentioned therein is required to be
submitted by every owner lessee to the authority (DDA / NDMC / MCD). Ministry of Urban
Development & Poverty Alleviation, Government of India vide Notification No. 01154 (E) dated
21.11.2001 abolished C and D certificates and introduced intimation of completion of work up to
plinth level.
(E) COMPLETION CUM OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE STAGE
(E.1) COMPLETION CUM OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE from local body (DDA / NDMC / MCD).
(E.1.1) Completion cum occupancy certificate is required from local body /authority (DDA /
NDMC / MCD) before occupation of a building or part of a building for any purpose. The local
body forwards the proposals to the various other concerned authorities (as mentioned above at
B.2.1 and 2.3 and 2.4) in the city as required for issue of case specific approvals / NOC before
granting permission cum occupancy certificate.
(E.2) APPROVAL FROM LIFT INSPECTOR
(E.2.1) NOC is required from Lift Inspector, GNCTD before granting completion cum occupancy
certificate when lifts are installed in a building.
Note: (*) These approvals are project specific.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 30 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
3 STATION USERS STUDY
3.1 Rail station complex design
3.1.1 Rail Passenger count at entry exit
The present Bijwasan station deals with a total of 4000 passengers per day – about 2000 inward
and 2000 outward. These passengers use the 10 pair of passenger train and one mail/express
which currently stop at Bijwasan. 600 passengers are dealt every day at Shahbad Mohammadpur
Halt.
However since both these stations – Bijwasan and Shahbad Mohammadpur Halt are proposed to
be closed after the new World Class Station at Sector 21 Dwarka is commissioned, these
passengers will no doubt be transferred partly to the new station and those with destinations
closer to Gurgaon station will shift to Gurgaon station since the new station will be about 2 Kms
further away towards Delhi.
Since no station exists at the site where the new Terminal is proposed to be constructed, it is
not possible to carry out any rail passenger count at this station. In view of this the projected
number of passengers at this new station has been assessed based on secondary survey data and
projections on the basis of planning of trains to be handled at this station.
These trains will approximately carry 26000 passengers each way that are supposed to be
transferred to Bijwasan. This assumes that trains which originate at present from New Delhi/Old
Delhi and Sarai Rohilla going towards West and South West of the Country will, in future, originate
from Bijwasan station and as such, the passengers from all over Delhi area bound for Western
and South Western India will necessarily come to Bijwasan to board the train. All trains in the
time horizon of 2030, the first year of commencement of operations, will have a composition of
26 coaches/train. Based on this train consist, a forecast of 26000 passengers per day is
considered reasonable as the train composition will be mostly of second class sleeper and general
second class coaches (70%) which will carry 75 passengers per coach. In addition, 32 trains
(against 21 pairs of trains at present) originate from elsewhere each way, are expected to stop
at Bijwasan station and by which about 10000 passengers will entrain/detrain at Bijwasan per
day. Thus, a total of 72000 passengers per day are likely to be dealt with at Bijwasan from the
first year of commencement of operation. Assuming a modest growth rate of 2% per annum, this
figure is likely to be increased to 129000 per day by the terminal year 2053. Considering the
effect of local development in the coming years and the number of railway staff and service
providers as well as platform ticket holding visitors who have come to receive and see off
passengers, a figure of 1, 38,000, footfalls are forecast which is also the number assessed in the
traffic report based on the line capacity has been adopted as station capacity for design of
facilities at this station.
While the Financial Consultant has given a projection of 1, 79,000 passengers per day, for reasons
explained above, we are sticking to 1, 38,000 passengers per day.
3.1.2 Entry and exit surveys at landing of the FOB
Since the existing station will be closed, the traffic on the FOB of this station is not relevant.
The new station has yet to come up and no FOB exists as such no survey was possible in this
regard.
There is no FOB proposed at this station. All passenger flows will be through sub-ways of which
adequate number and size have been planned and these have been discussed in the station
planning section of this report.
3.1.3 Entry and Exit surveys at the Reservation Counter
There are no Reservations counters at existing station and at the site of the proposed station. A
computerized Passenger Reservation Office, having state of the art facilities, is being planned
close to the Station. This has been included in the Master Plan and is discussed in the relevant
section of this report.
3.1.4 Analysis of interviews at ticket counters
Since this is a new station no interview for ticket counters could be conducted, however the
ticket counters are being designed as per MSSRS and international best practices. Details of these
are in the station planning section of this report
3.1.5 Willingness to Pay
An assessment based on similar developments generally indicates that the people are willing to
pay a small fee in return for improved amenities and services at the all new railway stations. It
is felt that the users will be willing to pay a nominal fee provided improved facilities are provided
to them.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 31 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
3.1.6 Parking Demand Survey
As the station has yet to come up, it has been not possible to carry out any study on parking
demand based on actual utilization. According to Delhi Development Authority’s Master
Development Plan (DDA 2010), the modal split from the year 2011 to 2022 is projected as given
below.
Mode Modal Split %
Public transport (including Rail/Light-rail/MRTS/IRBT/Bus/Tram) 80.0
Personal modes (including personal fast modes/ Hired fast modes/ Hired slow
modes/ Bicycle)
20.0
Table 6: Modal Split in Delhi 2011 - 2022 (Source: DDA Delhi Master Plan -2021 (2010)
Though the above modal split shows that public mode will constitute 80% of the commuters, and
20% using private modes like Cars and Two Wheelers, this report has taken into account, the
tremendous increase witnessed in the recent years in private transport due to increase
purchasing power and pegged the public transport mode into Bijwasan at 60% and private
transport mode at 40%. This is also corroborated by the Parking Demand Projection by 2053,
calculated based on modal share sourced from “The study on transportation policies and
strategies in Urban areas” prepared by Ministry of Urban Development.
Phase –1
The passenger demand for the proposed Bijwasan railway station (post commission) is about
88,000 passengers per day. This projects to around 88,000 foot falls per day. Accordingly, the
distribution of trips according to the mode of travel is represented below: (MoUD, 2008).
Serial No Mode Modal Share % Peak Hour Flow
1 Train – walk 5 % 385
2 Train – bus 30% 2310
3 Train-metro 30% 2310
4 Train - airport 0% 0
5 Train – car 15% 1155
6 Train-cycle 2% 154
7 Train-Tw 18% 1386
Table 7: (a) Distribution of Trips - Phase 1
Phase -2
For the year 2053, the traffic demand for the same is projected to be 1, 38,000 passengers per
day. This translates to 69,000 trips each way every day.
Accordingly, the distribution of trips according to the mode of travel is represented below:
(MoUD, 2008).
Serial No Mode Modal Share % Peak Hour Flow
1 Train – walk 5 % 690
2 Train – bus 30% 4140
3 Train-metro 30% 4140
4 Train - airport 0% 0
5 Train – car 15% 2070
6 Train-cycle 2% 276
7 Train-Tw 18% 2484
Table 8: (b) Distribution of Trips - Phase 2
The above assessment of distribution of passengers by various modes, into and out of Bijwasan,
during morning and evening peak hours, works out to around 10% of the total traffic of 138000
passengers to be dealt per day at Bijwasan.
Hence, based on the above modal share, and for the 69,000 trips made per day (one direction),
the PCU value is generated, taking into account the following considerations:
600 workers will get the Station by car or two wheels; these workers would park for 8
to 10 hours
Only 5% of the demand will be long term parkers using the parking facility for more
than one day.
The majority of the car users and two wheels users will use kiss & ride methods
(including taxis) and won’t need the parking facilities (more than 20%, depending on
the arrival hour)
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 32 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Figure 8: Stay Cars considered
Figure 9: Stay Two Wheelers Considered
Based on this, we anticipate a peak parking demand of 765 PCE in the year 2030 and 1200 PCE
in the forecasts for 2053.
3.1.7 Influence area of railway station
The direct influence area of Bijwasan railway station can be taken as covering Dwarka sub-city,
West and South West and Gurgaon. However since the proposed station is a directional terminal
and a number of important trains going from Delhi area to Western and South Western India will
originate and terminate at this terminus, people with origin in entire Delhi and surrounding NCR
towns of Noida, Faridabad and Gurgaon travelling by trains originating and terminating at New
Bijwasan Terminal (Dwarka) will be travelling to and from the proposed station, as such the
extended influence area of this railway station would be the entire Delhi city, Noida, Faridabad
and Gurgaon for long distance traffic and Dwarka sub-city and nearby area of Gurgaon for local
commuters.
3.1.8 Travel and socio economic characteristics
Since the existing station will be closed, and the new station has yet to come up no survey was
possible in this regard.
However, an assessment based on the details collected from secondary sources and its analyses
to understand the travel characteristics of the access and dispersal trips of the rail users has
been done.
The proposed station would be located in Dwarka Sector 21 on the South west of New Delhi
bearing the co-ordinates 28.5370751 N and 77.0513138. Dwarka sector-21 is a zone which has
well planned residential and commercial areas and houses the Dwarka Sector 21 metro station
and is also close to Indira Gandhi International airport. Also the area is poised for development
as the ISBT, the convention centre and the NPR and other major developments are in the
pipeline. Therefore, this zone shows promising travel and socio economic characteristics.
The UER II is the major road which will convey the traffic from the new station to other parts of
Dwarka. Based on our traffic study, the distribution of traffic on the UER II road is shown below:
Distribution of Traffic
From To Bijwasan Station (Peak Hour)
UER Road II 273
Towards Dwarka 136
Towards Gurgaon 136
Table 9: Distribution of Traffic Dwarka
Further, various modes of transport are available for the public in the Dwarka sector 21 area and
the travel characteristics of the zone is in favour of public transport comprising mostly of public
buses and the Delhi Metro.
Since the area shows a well-planned and mixed land use, the socio economic characteristics of
the region indicate lower to upper middle class residential layouts which have rely both on
private and public transport. Also, there are various commercial establishments and a few are
also proposed like the proposed convention Centre which will enable business trips.
3.1.9 Rail passengers characteristics
As no station exists at the new site at present, no such survey was possible. Accordingly sex, age,
monthly income and the distribution of passengers in male, female, Children and Sr. Citizen is
not available.. Details regarding type of ticket used, accompanying luggage, purpose of travel
and frequency of travel therefore cannot be ascertained as well as the scope for the same is non-
existent.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 33 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
3.1.10 Type of ticket used
For the long distance trains, tickets for First AC, Second AC, Third AC , sleeper class and second
class sitting compartments will mostly be reserved tickets booked through computer on IRCTC
sites and travel agents as well as at computer reservation centers throughout the country. For
unreserved second class general coaches, Unreserved Ticketing System (UTS) tickets will be
available at the ticket windows at the station. Tickets can also be purchased directly from
Automatic Ticket Vending Machines (ATVM) for journeys upto approximately 200 kms.
For local trains, monthly season tickets (MST) and Quarterly Season tickets (QST) are used by
daily passengers. However UTS and ATVM tickets are also available for casual passengers.
Frequent/daily passengers prefer MST tickets which are very economical and there is saving of
time as they do not have to stand in queue. However there is a distance restriction of
approximately 200kms for such tickets.
3.1.11 Trip frequency to Bijwasan station
Currently, 16 Mail/Express and 9 passenger trains pass through Bijwasan though the number of
trains halting at this station is only 21. Most of these trains are inter-city and suburban trains
which ply mainly to Dwarka, Gurgaon (commuter) and also to Jaipur and Ahmadabad (Inter-city).
The trip frequency distribution of these rail passengers indicates that daily and weekly trips at
the existing Bijwasan station are 55 % to 60% for departure and arrival respectively. Most of the
people from Gurgaon and Dwarka (39%) were found to travel frequently on a daily and weekly
basis. This indicates mostly an outward movement to the main city of Delhi for work and business
trips. Also, long distance trips to states such as Rajasthan and Gujarat constituted 19% on weekly
and fortnightly basis.
3.1.12 Travel characteristics of main trip
Since Bijwasan railway station is proposed to be a new terminal, the survey of passengers at the
existing Bijwasan station is not relevant. However, the OD passenger survey was conducted to
understand the travel characteristics of the passengers as a study to gauge the travel pattern of
the region as a whole. The characteristics of main trips and access/dispersal trips were analysed
separately for each leg of the travel and are presented in this section:
The travel time for the passengers was also found from the data collected from passenger OD
survey. The travel time for various legs of the journey for passengers accessing and dispersing
from the railway station was found. It is observed that the maximum number of commuters (61%)
accessing the Bijwasan railway station travel for 15 to 30 minutes in their first leg of their journey
followed by 37% travelling to 30 to 60 minutes for the first leg of their journey to reach the
Bijwasan station. About 63% of the passengers travel for 10 to 30 minutes from the first halt to
Bijwasan station followed by 31% of passengers travelling 30 to 60 minutes to reach the railway
station from the first leg of their journey.
For passengers dispersing from the station, maximum percentage of passengers (65%) travel for
10 to 30 minutes for their first leg of their journey from the Bijwasan station and 21% of
passengers travel for 30 to 60 minutes for their first leg of the journey. For the second leg of
their journey i.e from the first halt to their final destination 47 % of the passengers travel for 10
to 30 minutes and 28% of the passengers travel for 30 to 60 minutes.
Further, the maximum numbers of passengers have a travel cost of between Rs.15 to Rs.50 for
both arriving and departing passengers and their percentage share being 41% and 46%
respectively. Also, the highest share is of passengers having a travel cost between Rs.250 and
Rs.350 was 14% and 16% for the arriving and departing passengers respectively.
3.1.13 Travel characteristics of access/dispersal of trip
The passengers accessing the Bijwasan railway station for their onward journey is based on the
modal split of the type of transport mode used to make the trip to the station. The public
transport, namely bus, was found to have a miniscule share of 9 % as there is no suitable access
by bus in the vicinity of Bijwasan station. Auto and cars were the next most preferred modes of
transport at 33% and 18% respectively. Also, walking was preferred by 29% of the passengers.
Also, the distribution of passengers using various modes of travel for their journey once they
reach their destination using the train has been found, which again indicates that the passengers
prefer car, auto and walking for this leg of journey. In case of arrival trips by passenger in which
there is dispersal from the station, maximum number of passengers use auto for their first leg of
their journey which is 41% followed by car and bus which has a share of 19% & 11% respectively.
Also, it is seen that the maximum number of passengers (33%) departing from the Bijwasan
station have a waiting time of 10 to 20 minutes for their first halt and 42% of the passengers have
0-5 minutes as a waiting time for their second halt and 25% of the passengers have 5-10 minutes
as the waiting time for their end mile connectivity which is their last leg of their journey after
arriving by train.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 34 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Passengers were also enquired about the cost of their travel in the OD also for their various legs
of the access and dispersal journeys to and from the station. It can be seen that 41% of passengers
spend INR20 to INR 50 for their first leg of the journey for accessing the railway station. This was
followed by 34% of passengers spending between INR10 to INR20 for this leg of their journey.
Also, 21% of passengers were found to have spent more than INR100 for undertaking this leg of
their journey.
3.1.14 O-D pattern of Rail Passenger Traffic
The results of the Origin-Destination pattern depict the major origin and destination points based
in the influence area of the Bijwasan railway station. As it has been mentioned in the earlier
section of the report that about 66% comprise of non-reserved Sub-urban, Inter-city, and regional
nature mostly generated by the business district centres in Dwarka and the outward traffic from
Janak Puri, Dwarka, Gurgaon etc and other places from the Delhi area.
Under the Destination pattern or departures, the maximum number of trips was local travel
based and intended for the commuter travel and the suburb trips. Maximum numbers of trips
departing from the Bijwasan railway station were made to the Dwarka (1459 trips), Gurgaon
followed next with 875 trips. The rest of the trips include other suburban areas like Manesar and
Rohini.
3.1.15 Distribution of passengers
The OD data collected was analysed and the trip matrix for the entire area was developed. The
distribution of trips into suburban trips and long distance trips was found from the data collected
from users of the passenger trains plying at this station every day and they include long distance
trains as well as the local commuter trains. It was observed that 60 % of the traffic movement
was by suburban commuter trains. Most of these trips were generated by the Delhi-Rewari
passenger, Rewari-Delhi-Nizamuddin, Delhi-Sarai-Rohilla, Rewari Meerut cantonment etc. Trip
time from these suburban trains was of 15 min to 45 min duration. Mode wise distribution of
traffic was found to be mainly from Gurgaon, Manesar, Bhiwadi, and Rewari in Haryana etc.
As per this analysis, long distance passenger’s volume stood second at 40% as this was the number
of passengers at the Bijwasan terminal who travelled in long distance trains. This is also due to
the fact that most of the long distance passenger trains do not halt at this station. However,
some of the prominent long distance passenger trains like the Rajasthan Sampark Kranti Express,
Howrah-Bikaner link etc.
3.1.16 Bus Stop Boarding / Alighting
At the moment there is no station and as such no bus stop serving the station and hence the Bus
stop boarding/alighting survey could not be conducted. However, an Inter-State Bus Terminal
(ISBT) of area about 10 ha in sector 22 has been proposed on 100 m road connecting Dwarka with
NH8 & NH10. There is also a link proposed from this ISBT to the proposed Bijwasan station in the
form of a skywalk and thus there is a tremendous scope to promote multi-modal transport
between the ISBT, the metro station and the proposed Bijwasan station.
Based on our traffic forecasts for the ISBT, the total traffic demand per day is found to be 37500
passengers currently. However, with a 24 % [figure of 24 % obtained thus: current- 37500/
(192000(projected)-37500) = 24%] the traffic demand for 2030 for the ISBT is projected to be
190500 passengers. Thereafter, with an anticipated growth of 10%, the traffic demand for the
year 2053 is forecasted to be 208820 passengers.
We can estimate that at least 10% of the passengers, i.e, 20880 will also be diverted to the
proposed Bijwasan terminal to provide a multi-modal connectivity or even as a feeder service.
3.1.17 Major observations
The current Bijwasan station is presently a sub-urban station and is located on the Delhi-Rewari
line. It is served by 21 passenger trains which halt at this station comprising of express/mail &
passenger trains though the number of through trains is 68. Based on the Passenger count survey
at the station entry/exit, a total of approximately 4000 passengers per day comprising of 2000
inward and outward passengers respectively were found at the existing Bijwasan station.
However, since no station exists at the site where the new terminal is proposed to be built, it is
not possible to carry out any rail passenger survey/count.
The proposed Bijwasan station will have more trains plying and also some of the trains from Delhi
will be diverted here. Thus the new station will have more long distance trains and more
commuter trains. This will extend the influence area of this railway station to the entire Delhi
city, Noida, Faridabad and Gurgaon for long distance traffic and Dwarka sub-city and nearby area
of Gurgaon for local commuter travel.
The existing Bijwasan railway station has limited passenger carrying capacity and has poor
connectivity with other modes of transport. However, the proposed station at Dwarka sector 21
will be located in a hub which has a significant scope for intermodal transport given that the
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 35 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Dwarka metro station and the IGI airport are located in the vicinity. Also, the ISBT is proposed
which will improve connectivity by buses both for intercity travel and as a feeder service for the
Delhi metro station at Dwarka.
3.2 Station Performance Assessment
3.2.1 Employee Strength Analysis
At this juncture, it is not possible to work out the department wise future strength of railway
staff that will get posted at New Bijwasan Terminal. However, considering the existing staff
strength at working stations of similar size and capacity in Delhi area, like Hazrat Nizammuddin
and Delhi Sarai Rohilla, we can make an approximate assessment of the staff that will be required
at this station.
While doing so, we have also considered that railways are now out-sourcing certain activities and
except for supervisory or monitoring staff for these activities, no railway staff will be there.
However, even for this contract staff, suitable accommodation for their sitting, tools and
equipment will have to be planned.
The activities for which outsourcing has so far been privatized and accordingly the following
categories of staff are no longer being recruited by the Railway-
1. Watermen
2. Box Porters
3. Khalasies
4. Running Room Cook /Bearers
5. Safaiwalas
6. Waiting Room attendents
7. P.Way maintenance- selected items
8. Works- zonal contract maintenance
9. Coach Maintenance- safaiwalas
10. Coach Servicing- Housekeeping Services
Department Approx staff ( 3 shifts )
Phase-1
Approx staff ( 3 shifts )
Phase-2
Misc staff (Medical,
Administration of complex etc.
accounts and auditing)
32 8
Operations 88 22
Commercial 192 48
C&W 200 50
Traction 104 26
Signalling 100 25
Works 40 10
Electrical train lighting, and
Electrical General 272 68
Telecommunication 72 18
P.Way 96 24
RPF 103 27
1. Train Operation Staff: Total strength- 110. Includes Senior Station Manager (Day Shift ),
Station Managers, Goods and Passenger train Guards, Traffic Assistants (Pointsmen
),Shunting Master and trains clerks- working in shifts around the clock.
The proposed strength of 110 shall be in all categories in the year 2053 in the interest of
smooth functioning and efficiency in train operations.
2. Commercial staff: Total strength of 240. It will include functional supervisors and
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Proposed Facilities / Amenities
S. No. Type Proposed Amenities Phase 1
Proposed Amenities Phase- 2
(with existing platform configuration but passenger estimated for design year
2053)
1. Ticketing Block Ticketing blocks will be located at ground floor hosted into the Control Area. Ticketing blocks will be located at both ground and first floor hosted into the
Control Area, with an approximated surface of more than 80 sq. m per block.
2. Booking Windows Booking windows located in the Control area, hosting travel information centers,
foreign exchange centers, Fare vending and ticketing/information.
Booking windows located as well in the Control area, hosting travel information
centers, foreign exchange centers, Fare vending and ticketing/information with a
total surface of approximated of 250 sq. m per floor.
3. Enquiry Office Enquiry offices are provided at the entrance at ground floor. No enquiry office is planned; instead, Information centers are thought to be
located at every floor, with an approximated surface of 20 sq. m per block.
4. Parking Facilities Surface parking is proposed in the ground floor as per immediate traffic
projections.
Provisions are made in the Master Plan for the traffic projection for the year
2053.Parking Area proposed is 42,000 sq. m
5. Entry points: Security check + Ticket check Security check and ticket check located in the Control Gates as stated by Manual
of Standards at ground floor as well as first floor before the concourse
Security check and ticket check located in the Control Gates as stated by Manual of
Standards with an approximated surface of 300 sq. m
6. Concourse Concourses are developed at first floor level, hosting reserved waiting areas,
unreserved waiting areas and lounge zones and retail areas.
Concourses are developed in underground (13000 sq. m) and first level (18000 sq.
m), this last one hosting reserved waiting areas ( more than 2012 sq. m) ,unreserved
waiting areas(more than 1074 sq. m) and lounge zones (more than 326 sq. m for
the first class lounge and more than 378 sq. m for the executive lounge)
7. Waiting Rooms The waiting areas are primarily located at the first floor and platforms. These
areas are serviced with seating, and retails including food and beverage kiosks,
and toilet block
Each level is catered with waiting cores and lounges spread all over the walking
zones. These cores, host seating, food shops, toilet blocks and retail shops.
8. Toilets/Lavatories Each area is provided with toilet blocks as per NBCC standards and norms. Each zone stated by the Manual for Standards and Specifications will be provided of
Toilet blocks of an approximated surface of 50 sq. m per block.
9. FOB There is an FOB connecting the drop off area and the main station building.
However there are no FOB’s planned for access to the platforms, as we have
provided a concourse for that purpose. The passengers alighting from arriving
trains will have to use the tunnels connecting each platform to the main building
as per the overall scheme of segregation.
No fly over bridges are thought to be located in this station, as the access to the
platforms will be done by the main building and the arrivals hall will be located in
the underground..
10. Platform Based in studies of demand in the worst case (Passengers) /Centre Platform with
a width result of 11.25 for each Platform center(m)
Based in studies of demand in the worst case (Passengers) /Centre Platform with a
width result of 11.25 for each Platform center(m)
11. Platform height and finishing Will be provided as per MSSRS. Will be provided as per MSSRS.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 67 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Proposed Facilities / Amenities
S. No. Type Proposed Amenities Phase 1
Proposed Amenities Phase- 2
(with existing platform configuration but passenger estimated for design year
2053)
12. Snacks bar Provision as stated by manual for standards Provision as stated by manual for standards
13. Parcel Movement A separate tunnel has been provided for the parcel movement from the platform
to the station building. However in the first phase the parcel handling area and its
dispersal and loading/unloading bays has been kept the basement level with a
separate traffic movement so that there is a segregation from the arrival passenger
traffic.
A central parcel path way is provided in the underground floor with full access from
the exterior, besides, the side passengers´ underpass can be used in case that is
needed.
14. Information screen Available per each floor ,provision as stated by manual for standard Available per each floor ,provision as stated by manual for standard
15. Clocks Digital clocks are available per each floor, provision as stated by manual for
standards
Digital clocks are available per each floor, provision as stated by manual for
standards
16. Coaching information Board Available at each floor, provision as stated by manual for standard Available per each floor ,provision as stated by manual for standard
Table 17: Proposed Facilities / Amenities in Station
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 68 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
However, it has to be taken into account that the areas and surfaces presented above are based
in the studies done during the KD3 stage, according to that, these areas represents the basis to
adjust and develop the definitive surfaces for this report.
5.10 Logistic Area
The Landuse Zonal Plan K-II for the Dwarka Project determines an exclusive Railway Passenger
Area for the Sector 21.
In addition to this use, a Logistic area is proposed to be developed on the other side of the UER
II road.
5.10.1 Logistic Area Planning Objective
Bijwasan World Class Station shall been designed following the principles detailed in the ¨Manual
for Specification for standards and specifications for railway stations¨.
The development of the Master Plan shall include a Logistic Area. This space has been designed
under the next key elements:
Accessibility
Safety and Security
Fast and Efficient handling zone
Flexible open spaces for tracks
Adequate storage areas
Controlled areas
5.10.2 Logistic Area Sizing and Location
The Logistic area is designed integrating the local planned development and shall incorporate
exiting urban resources wherever possible.
The road system proposed for this area is a ring road system that surrounds a central storage
core. One line of storage buildings is directly linked to the loading/unloading parcel platform. In
addition to this development, some facility buildings (such as railway administration and Hotel
for truckers or Railway personnel) are proposed to be located in this area to give service to
handling processes.
The rest of the area will be developed with Mixed Uses, mainly related to logistics and stores
due to the closeness to the Railways parcel area and to the logistic area proposed by DDA in the
neighbour sector. The height restrictions imposed by the airport lead to recommend logistic and
commercial uses like wholesalers, furniture stores, etc.
5.10.3 Connections to Traffic Pattern
The ring road system proposed in the Logistic area is connected directly to the UER II road which
is sufficiently broad to assimilate heavy traffic. Some roundabouts of the interior road system
are designed to connect with future urban pattern developments.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 69 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
6 MASTER PLANNING
6.1 General Considerations
One of the objectives of the project is to transform Dwarka Sector 21 into a modern centre of
attraction for Delhi citizens.
The adopted design takes advantage of the strategic location to generate an inviting urban centre
where different uses can evolve respectfully and can permit Delhi´s citizens enjoy a new modern
and healthy public space.
The main criteria and elements to be considered in the development of the Master Plan for
Bijwasan are following:
Efficient connectivity between different transportation systems
Improve the integration with the current urban pattern
Inviting urban design
Promote the internal functionality of the station also its permeability, with new
accesses from the urban space
Modern and attractive architecture (Specially the Railway Station)
Pleasant Green zones
Effective road system
Isolation from acoustic contamination (airport, railway)
Environment improvement
Efficient parcel area
Propose a successive and phased implementation that gradually relocate some uses
and remove others. Relocations will only be possible at a long term.
6.2 Urban Context
With a population of 23 Million inhabitants and covering an area of 1482 square kilometres, Delhi
is the capital of India. As one of the fastest growing cities in the world, Delhi is incorporating
several remarkable infrastructure projects.
Among the multitude transport infrastructure in development, railways have been given special
attention. The existing Bijwasan Station, which lies on the south west of New Delhi, shall be
replaced by a modern railway station, offering world class facilities to the passengers.
The future Bijwasan Station will be developed on Dwarka Sector 21. Dwarka area is one of the
zones of Delhi with more development in the last years.
The railway land available at Bijwasan for the construction of the new terminal is 145.39 ha.
Land measuring 110.07 ha has been earmarked by DDA (Delhi Development Authority) for
Northern Railways; remaining of approximated 12.91 ha is under litigation between DDA and
current occupants (village, farmhouses, school, cremation yard, grace yard…). However,
according to the land survey demarcation 109.57 ha of plot is only established at ground for
development as Taj Vivanta Hotel and DMRC depot may have occupied some part of the plot. In
addition to this, 22.90 ha of land abutting this plot under existing main line will also be available
for development.
Figure 37: Land Area Available
AREA STATEMENT
A Sq.m Hect.
Area under road /main line 229000 22.90
B Land acquired from DDA by NR 1095795 109.58
C
Land under litigation
Govt .girls sr sec school 24267 2.43
Grave yard 4806 0.48
Cremation ground-1 5299 0.53
Anup narang farm 17014 1.70
Chawla&jain narang farm 21218 2.12
Govt. Boys sr. Sec school 21510 2.15
Pond 8901 0.89
Mohmad shahbadpur village 25605 2.56
Cremation ground-2 505 0.05
Total land to be acquired 129125 12.91
TOTAL LAND (A+B+C) =145.39 Ha ******
Table 18: Area Statement Table
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 70 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
This site is crossed longitudinally by the current railway line from Delhi-Jaipur and is located
close to the Indira Gandhi International Airport. The Site is also crossed transversally by the UER
II road. There is a metro station, called Dwarka-21, which was recently finished. It is served by
2 lines: Airport Express Line and Blue Line. Several Metro extensions are planned in the area:
Blue Line is to be extended within Dwarka
Airport Express Line will connect Dwarka-21 with Gurgaon through Bijwasan
A new Light Rail Transit (LRT) line following the Northern Peripheral Road [NPR] is planned
Figure 38: Other Planned Infrastructures
The Government of Delhi is also planning to develop an Inter State Bus Terminal (ISBT) adjoining
the railway land on the west. This ISBT is expected to cater about 1.5 Lakhs commuters daily
and the plan is to have all interstate buses from Haryana and Rajasthan to terminate here itself
to reduce congestion in the city and provide an organized system of intercity bus movement.
This state of the art bus terminus is being planned to have separate bus bays for local and
intercity buses with waiting area, book stalls, restaurant, internet cafes and a hotel for transiting
passengers. It is being visualized to connect diverse transportation modes like interstate buses,
commercial passengers’ shuttle, intercity metro rail, airport shuttle, taxis and auto rickshaws.
Skywalks or subway is envisaged between the metro station and the ISBT.
Second diplomatic enclave, housing embassies of about 40 nations, is planned to come up in
sector 26 – 29 of Dwarka. Sec 26 is adjoining the site on its south.
An International Convention and Exhibition Centre has been planned by DDA in sector 24, which
is about 2.5 km west of the site. It will have an auditorium with capacity for 12000 persons in an
area 86,400 sq. m, a hotel complex of 60,000 sq. m and a commercial complex of 36,600 sq. m.
Integrated freight complex was provided in the MPD 2021 but this is under review considering
the objections to congesting the roads by trucks. In any case the proposal for railway freight
terminal which had been planned here has since been dropped, as advised by Northern Railway
in the meeting held on 02.05.2013.
At this moment, the area is basically empty and unlinked to the current urban pattern. At the
moment some farm fields, a government school and a crowded village can be found in the site.
As previously explained, all these elements are inside Sector 21, but do not belong to the
Northern Railways property. Railway has some temporary facilities not to be considered in the
future development.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 71 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The Landuse Zonal Plan K-II for the Dwarka Project determines an exclusive Railway Passenger Area for
the Sector 21.
Figure 39: Master Plan of Delhi 2021 Zone K-II (Dwarka)
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 72 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Figure 40: General Plot
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 73 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
6.3 Station Master Plan
6.3.1 Station as a Link
The development of the station must not see the new building only just an isolated iconic item,
but understand that a world class station has to be also a fully integrated part of the Master
Plan, thus to become a key piece to link the surroundings.
Figure 41: Aerial View of the Station and the Master Plan
6.3.2 Intermodal transportation Hub
The location of the new world class station is strategic due to the transport systems that are
settled around it. Therefore, when designing the new Bijwasan world class station, the
connections between them, have to be taken into account accurately.
As stated before in this document, the future Bijwasan Station is proposed to be developed on
Dwarka Sector 21, over approximated 145.39 ha flat field owned by Northern Railway. This site
is crossed longitudinally by the current railway line from Gurgaon to Delhi and located close to
the Indira Gandhi International Airport. The site is also crossed transversally by the UER II road.
Besides, the Delhi Metro provides connectivity to this site through a new Metro Station recently
finished inside the Sector 21.
In addition to this, an Inter State Bus Terminal and a Park & Ride area are proposed to be
developed near the site. All these features make the area especially interesting from the point
of view of transportation.
6.3.3 Public spaces development
The development of the public open spaces has a relevant importance, because these spaces
have the objective of linking uses and protecting the urban areas from acoustic and visual
contamination. They also grant an overall view of the whole development and serve as a symbolic
link to the local culture, to the series of Delhi´s famous landscaped gardens and parks.
The aim of this Master Plan is to provide a new urban space in which several uses can be
developed and dialogue efficiently.
In addition to this and due to the specific location of the Sector 21 (close to a railway line,
airport, UER II and metro line), the urban equipment tries to define friendly urban spaces
protecting citizens and buildings from the possible impact of these urban facilities.
The main public space is located in a “core” square that serves as the urban hall. All transport
lines are linked to this space. A green pedestrian path starts and ends in this square and runs
along the area facing the north and south crossing a modern office area. This green axis must be
treated with a special project of landscaping in order to grant a friendly urban response to the
citizens.
Less aggressive native plant species and artificial lakes will be promoted along this path.
The landscaping around the development prevents the different uses from the acoustic impact
that comes from airport and the railway yard.
6.4 Master Plan
The proposed solution is based on the development of a clear and efficient urban pattern that
can be divided into three different parts:
Mixed Uses Area in the north
Commercial and Transport zone in the center
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 74 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Mixed Uses in the south
Mixed Uses have been broadly categorized into hospitality, commercial offices and retail areas.
Refer attached drawings in the report for details.
The Master Plan follows TOD suggestion of dividing the plot into blocks of no more than 300m
length, in order to provide appropriate connectivity between the different areas. Wide green
spaces are proposed to serve also as pedestrian connection. A green route passes through the
core space where all transport systems (metro, railway station, road main access, future bus
station, park & ride) have a station.
The basic principles are:
Efficient connectivity through the UER II road (both South and North Area of the plot)
and with other road systems
Optimal sized interior road system
Interior “ring” road system, finer street network
Transport central square (Urban core)
Green pedestrian path, wide green areas.
Mixed uses around the Station
Good connection between transport buildings
World class railway station with clear flow separation
The main access to the south area is made through a new large roundabout on the UER II. An
interior ring road system is proposed in both sides (south and north areas of the plot) divided by
this express way. This type of urban pattern permits to leave the interior spaces free. A green
pedestrian path is proposed to be placed on these interior spaces, seeking to create friendly
urban spaces within walking distances.
The spaces distribution and the building heights are adapted to the constraints originated by the
airport runway and its air funnel (the routes of the planes landing and taking off). These
limitations are located basically in the central-south part of Sector 21. The less height buildings
are proposed to be placed in this part. The height of buildings grows as distance from the runway
increases.
Native tree species will be planted around the whole area seeking to reduce the acoustic impact
of both the Airport and UER-II highway.
The characteristics of the adopted solution are:
Cross disposition of the station connected with the existing metro station on its side
façade.
Parcel and logistic placed at the west side of the plot combined with commercial uses.
Green axis along the plot.
Commercial mall located near the station.
Figure 42: General Layout
Plot areas are as follows:
MASTER PLAN FINAL PHASE
USE GROUND COVERAGE
(SQ.M) PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SITE AREA
BUILT-UP AREA (SQ.M)
WORLD CLASS RAILWAY STATION 65,590.00 4.51 1,31,397.00
RAILWAY FACILITIES 23,079.00 1.59 23,079.00
MIXED USES 5,97,371.00 41.09 11,03,194.45
YARD PLAN 4,22,888.00 29.09 0.00
OPEN SPACES 1,15,719.00 7.96 0.00
ROADS 1,87,638.00 12.91 0.00
LAKES 41,635.00 2.86 0.00
TOTAL PLOT 14,53,920.00 100.00
Table 19: Summary of Plot Areas
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 75 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
6.5 Phase 1 for the Master Plan
As it is said in the chapter before, the first phase considers the assumption of Far 1, as established
by DDA, distributing the land use as follows; 70% of the land under railway operations, 30% under
building operations and only 15% related to hospitality.
S.no Use premises Activities permitted
Development controls
Area under
operation (%)
Area under
building (%)
Far*
Floor area that can be utilised for passenger accomodation
1.
Rail
terminal/integra
ted passenger
terminal
All facilities related to
railway passengers,
operations, goods
handling, passengers
change over facilities,
including watch and
ward, hotel.
70 30 100 15%
Table 20: FAR as per MPD 2021
According to this policy, there are some areas that must be constructed in the initial phase, so
the areas taken into account to be developed in the first phase are the following:
Figure 43: Phase-1 Development Landuse
Based on Development Controls Norms, the following table show the Areas on site:
TOTAL GROSS PLOT AREA 15,40,929
TOTAL NET PLOT AREA 14,53,920
FAR SCENARIO
TOTAL PLOT AREA 14,53,920
FLOOR AREA UNDER OPERATION 10,17,744 (70% )
FLOOR AREA UNDER BUILDING 4,36,176 (30%)
FLOOR AREA PASSENGER ACCOMMODATION 2,18,088 (15%)
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA 14,53,920
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA (RAILWAYS) 2,31,576
BUILT UP AREA MIXED USES (PHASE-1) 3,99,579
Built Up Area from Multilevel Parking (25%*14405) 3,601
BUILT UP AREA MIXED USES (PHASE-2) 7,03,615
Table 21: Phase - 1 Area Statement
In 2010, Northern Railways proposed the layout for tracks. After deliberations, this proposal
suffered several changes:
i. The terminal has to be planned for horizon year 2053 only for handling passenger. There
will be no freight traffic in future Bijwasan terminal, since space for loading/unloading
of freight in the tentative plan was considered inadequate.
ii. Area is to be earmarked for commercial development to enable financing of proposed
terminal.
iii. Washing line and sick line complex is to be provided on both ends due to land
constraints.
iv. The handing over of remaining land i.e. 12.91ha will take time hence; development
could be planned in two phases: before vacation & after vacation of remaining area.
A Road over bridge in lieu of level crossing No.21, in south of the existing BWSN station on the
Delhi –Rewari main is currently under construction, amounting to Rs.59.3 crores.
Due to the aforementioned changes, the track layout for Bijwasan station has been changed and
refined. Current yard plan, recently redesigned by Northern Railways, can be found in drawing
nos. BWSN-TL-KD4-ARC-PLN-100 to 105 of this document.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 76 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Figure 44: Phase-1 Development
Figure 45: Phase-1 Development Aerial View
6.5.1 Phase 1
The works that will be done during the initial phase of the Master Plan will be the following:
Construction of the station
Construction of the ring Road that cater the station and the surroundings
Construction of all the facilities related with the operation of the station
Construction of housing blocks for the station operation staff
Maintenance of farms
Maintenance of the village
Maintenance of school
Maintenance of the lakes
Construction of the computer passenger reservation office
The built up Area is calculated based on the current norms with a FAR under 100. The proposed
multi storey parking, as per the chapter 12 in MPD norms:
The built up area can increase taking into account the gross area from the Parking (14405 m2).
The area of parking is given in the table below
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA 14,53,920
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA (RAILWAYS) 2,31,576
BUILT UP AREA MIXED USES (PHASE 1) 3,99,579
BUILT UP AREA FROM MULTILEVEL PARKING (25%*14405) 3,601
BUILT UP AREA MIXED USES (PHASE 2) 7,03,615
Table 22: Phase-1 Development Built-up Area
This Master Plan decides to spend the these built up area on Phase 1 i.e. 2,31,576 m2 for Railways
elements and 3,99,579.19 m2 for mixed uses under limitations from the MPD 2012.
The report in its subsequent chapters contains the details of this area called now as mixed uses
trying to show the different way for managing it in order to improve the revenues coming from
the investment in this plot.
Figure 46: Final Phase Development
12.1.3.7 MULTILEVEL PARKING
Multilevel Parking facility should preferably be developed in the designated parking spaces or in the
residential public-semi-public facilities, commercial, transport node, DTC depot, etc., with the
following Development Controls:
Minimum Plot size – 1000sqm.
In order to compensate the cost of Multi-level parking and also to fulfil the growing need of parking
space within urban area, a maximum of 25%of gross floor area may be utilized as commercial / office
space.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 77 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
6.5.2 Final Phase
Relocation of the village
Relocation of school
Urban equipment development
Master plan final development
There are 12.91 Ha of the land under litigation. Finale Phase or the Phase-2 will come when that
land was given to Railways and probably when the land available at this moment can develop
under UTTIPEC Guideline, who, probably, will increase the FAR of the Total Plot.
The proposal will change the actual view into a new Hub of Transportation. The area under
influence of UTTIPEC is, right now, 300m from the metro station and also from the railways
Station, That´s means the whole plot is under the shape of that influence and show this area for
the future as a real gold mine.
Figure 47: Influence Areas according to UTTIPEC Policy
Figure 48: Final Phase Aerial View
Figure 49: View of the Final Phase Completed
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 78 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
7 STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL CONCEPTS
7.1 Introduction
The structural design methodology explained in this chapter applies to the proposed station
buildings structure and all associated structures that are part of the development. The structural
concept design also contains brief references to all the facilities included on the Master Plan.
Bijwasan Railway Station Building will be a one-story building high over ground level structure,
and it will have a basement level and parking under this basement level at the west side (metro
station side).
The Station consists of a “bridge building” over the ground floor, leaving free room under their
spans for railway lines, roads and different vehicle or passenger access or exits.
7.2 Structural Considerations
The Design Concepts of the Structures is based on Limit State method of design as envisaged in
IS 456 – 2000, and all the structures will be designed for Dead loads, Imposed loads, Live loads,
Seismic loads and Wind loads taking into consideration the relevant Codes and load combination
specified in them. So, the objective of this chapter is to provide the concepts being adopted in
design of structures and facilities as per Relevant BIS, IRS and IRC codes while integrating
requirements of the project.
The proposed buildings will be designed in Reinforced Cement Concrete framed structures; steel
structures will be used for roofs and long span elements over the tracks. Concrete structures are
preferred because they need less maintenance than steel structures, which accounts to more
economic and sustainable buildings. Steel structures, on the other side, are required for easy
mounting and construction over non interruptible railway tracks, or where structural depth must
be keep to a minimum.
All underground structures, tanks, retaining walls, box culverts, etc. shall be designed as RCC
construction as per considered soil data. Waterproofing for water retaining structures shall be
carried out with injection type chemical grouting.
Given the huge dimensions of the Roof and its special variable shape, it will be worthy to conduct,
at a well-known Laboratory, a wind tunnel test to assess the real wind pressures on the structure.
These wind tunnels tests have long proved to be of economical and structural relevance. They
help to quickly point out potential local suction/pressure peak sources and also to produce subtle
changes in roof geometry and materials that greatly benefits the general output.
Wind tunnels structure tests generally let Designer use smaller global forces on the main
structure, due to the fact that Code formulae are envelopes of multiple possible (and generally
most adverse) situations, while a wind tunnel test is focused in the real structure to be built and
the actual or future conditions at its surroundings.
7.3 Design Codes and Standards
The designs of the structures shall comply with the following Codes will be used in various stages
of works.
IRC Codes:
IRC -5 – 1985 : Standard Specification and Code of practice for Road
Bridges General feature of designs
IRC -6 – 2010 : Standard Specification and Code of practice for Road
Bridges – Loads and Stress
IRC -21 – 2000 : Standard Specification and Code of practice for Road
Bridges – Cement Concrete (Plain and Reinforcement)
IRC -37 – 2001 : Guidelines for the Design Flexible Pavements
IRC -15 – 2002 : Standard Specification and Code of practice for
Construction of Concrete Roads
IRS Codes:
IRS Substructure and Foundation code - 1985
IRS Bridge Rules – 1986
IRS Concrete Bridge Code – 1997
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 79 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
IS Codes:
IS 456- 2000 : Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice.
IS 800- 1998 : Code of Practice for General Construction in Steel
IS 2950(Part–1) : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Raft Foundations.
IS 2911
(Part1/sec.1)
: Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile. Foundations for Driven Cast
In – Situ Concrete Piles.
IS 2911
(Part 1/sec.2)
: Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile. Foundations for Bored Cast
In – Situ Concrete Piles.
IS 2911
(Part 1/sec.3)
: Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile. Foundations for Driven
Precast Concrete Piles.
IS 2911
(Part 1/sec.4)
: Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile.
Foundations for Bored Precast Concrete Piles.
IS 2911(Part III) : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile. Foundations for Under –
Reamed Piles.
IS 2911(Part IV) : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile. Foundations for Load Test
on Piles.
IS 6403 : Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations.
IS 9556 : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Diaphragm Walls.
IS 1904 : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Foundations in Soils –General
Requirements.
IS 14593 : Design and Construction of Bored Cast – in – situ Piles founded on Rock – General
Requirements.
IS 806 : Code of Practice for use of Steel Tubes in General Building Construction.
IS 1893 – 2002 : Criteria of Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures: Part – 1 – Buildings.
IS 875 : Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) Parts 1 to 5.
IS 4326 : Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings.
IS 13920 : Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces.
IS 8009 : Code of Practice for Calculation of Settlement of foundations (Part 1 and 2)
IS 1343 : Code of Practice for Prestressed Concrete.
IS 3370 : Code of Practice for concrete Structures for the Storage of Liquids (Parts 1 to 4)
IS 2974 : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Machine Foundations (Parts 1 to
5)
IS 4923 : Hollow Steel Sections for Structural use.
IS 10270 : Guidelines for Design and Construction of Prestressing Rock Anchors.
IS 12070 : Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations on Rock.
SP 16: 1980 : Design aids for reinforced concrete to IS 456: 1978
SP34: 1987 : Handbook on concrete reinforcement and detailing.
-- National Building Code of India
Table 23: IS Codes
Where the design is not covered by Indian Standards, reference shall be made to international
standards for guidance.
Standard Software:
STAAD Pro – for Analysis and Design
In-house developed Excel Spread Sheets for Designs
Auto Cad - for Drawings.
7.4 Materials
Concrete
Keeping the durability and structural requirement, the proposed strength of various elements of
structure will be as follows:
fck = 40 MPa (precast elements, if necessary)
fck = 30 MPa (all in situ structures, except foundations)
fck = 25 MPa (foundations)
fck = 10 MPa (levelling concrete)
Concrete characteristics as detailed above might need to be improved if the structure
environment is found to be particularly aggressive (soil or water). This shall be assessed on case-
by-case basis, determining the cement characteristics, water/cement ratio, additives, etc, as
required by the applicable Codes.
Reinforcement Steel
Thermo–Mechanically treated reinforcement bars of grade Fe500 conforming to IS – 1786 will be
adopted. Yield Stress: Fy – 500 MPa for Fe500.
Structural steel
Mild steel (MS) with a yield stress of 250 N/mm² shall be used for structural steel work. High
grade (H6) steel with a yield stress of 350 N/mm2.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 80 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
7.5 Loading Standards
Dead load
All self-weight of structural members shall be considered as per IS 875 Part – I. Unit weights of
various buildings materials used are as follows:
25 kN/m3 For prestressed concrete
25 kN/m3 For reinforced cement concrete
24 kN/m3 For plain cement concrete
20 kN / m3 For Brick masonry
14 kN / m3 For Ordinary Portland cements
15.5 kN / m3 For Earth dry
19.0 kN / m3 For Earth moist
27 kN / m3 For Natural stone / Granite
20 kN / m3 For Cement Mortar
18 kN / m3 For Fine river sand
23.5 kN / m3 For Stone Masonry
78.5 kN / m3 For Steel
10 kN / m3 For Water
Imposed Loads
All the Imposed Loads shall be considered as per IS 875 Part-II.
The imposed loads recommended herein are for UDL (Uniformly Distributed Load) over the Floor.
Loading for floor finishes / Utilities / Piping / Cables / Ducts / False Ceiling etc. hanging from
slabs / beams shall be taken separately, in addition to the live loads mentioned below.
Live loads
The following Live loads are the estimated for the structural designing of the commercial &
residential buildings:
Live Load of 500 kg. / Sq. m. for commercial & public areas
Live Load of 200 kg. / Sq. m. for residential areas on buildings.
Live Load of 150 kg. / Sq. m. for terrace floor
Water tanks, cooling towers etc. shall be taken as per the manufacturer’s specs.
Wind Load
The Design Wind Load on Buildings shall be in accordance with IS 875 (Part 3): 1987
The Wind load on Building shall be calculated for:
The Building as a whole
Individual Structural elements as roofs and Walls
Individual Cladding units and including glazing and their fixings.
The design wind parameters are:
Basic design wind speed = 39 m/s (10m height in open terrain)
Buildings’ design life of 100 years
Terrain category 1
Class C structure
Topography plain
Seismic loads
Seismic load calculations shall be considered as per IS 1893
The proposed site is in seismic zone IV as per seismic zone map of India. Zone IV is a
High Damage Risk Zone.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 81 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Since the geometry of structure is irregular and higher seismic zone, dynamic analysis
shall be carried out.
The IS code establishes a maximum ground acceleration of 0.24 g for Zone 4, so Seismic
Loads are therefore very important and will play an important role on structure design.
Various design parameters for seismic analysis are as follows:
1. Zone factor (Z) = 0.24
2. Importance factor for the structure (I) = 1.0 / 1.5
3. Response reduction factor (R) = 5.0
4. Soil Type = Hard Soil
5. The horizontal earthquake force shall be calculated for the full dead load and 50%
of live loads.
6. The permissible stresses for concrete and steel shall be increased by 25% while
considering the seismic load. The SBC value shall be enhanced for all EQ
combinations as per Table – I of IS – 1893.
7. Base shear for the building shall be calculated as V ~ AhW considering the
coefficient defining the flexibility of the structure.
8. The horizontal and vertical load resisting elements of the stilt storey are to be
designed for 2.5 times storey shear and moments calculated under seismic load.
Load Combinations
All load combination shall be considered as per IS 1893.
Following Load Combinations shall be adopted for Analysis and Design of various Buildings:
c) Iron (rarely in river water, but in bore well water as dissolved iron)
d) Salinity – TDS – Total dissolved salts
Since the water usage meant for non-potable, following treatment can be adopted:
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 104 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
a) Pumping to traditional clarification
b) Coagulation & Flocculation – on-line using diaphragm type dosing pump of 10%
diluted chemicals
c) Storage of clarified water – disinfectant dosing to eliminate bacteria
d) Pumping to multigrade sand filter followed by carbon filter
e) If iron found, strong hypo-chlorite dosing followed by aeration would be required
Initially before clarification.
Potable water requirement:
Usage – Mainly for drinking, cooking and other food related water requirement for canteen/ resort
/ hotels / railways free drinking water distribution network.
Apart from the above treatment, the filtered water will be pumped to membrane separation
technology called Reverse Osmosis to reduce the salinity to potable of < 30 mg/l TDS. This
requires maintenance of cleaning the RO membranes periodically to enhance life of membranes,
which are normally 3 to 5 years, subjected to proper & effective operation. Simply, an anti-
scalant would be used/dosed regularly to avoid scaling over the membranes, as otherwise
membranes are subjected to get choked and if not maintained will lose its ability to separate
salts.
9.2.4.2 Storage Reservoirs
In order to maintain the regular water supply and meet the water demand for daily consumption
for the development, three numbers of storage tanks has been proposed at the site.
The proposed water tank capacities for the development are as follows
1. Underground RCC Tank for Firefighting - 200 KLD
2. Underground RCC Tank for Domestic Water – 816 KLD
3. Overhead RCC Tank for Domestic Water – 200 KLD
Refer drawing no. BWSN-MP-KD4-ARC-PLN-120 in which the locations of these tanks have been
indicated.
Figure 66: Command Tank in Ter-Llobregat Network, Barcelona (Spain)
9.2.4.3 Water Distribution Network
From the reservoirs the potable water will be distributed to the consumers. The distribution may
be by gravity or by pressure. According to the topography of the area, it will be required to use
the pumping stations and pressure groups to supply the potable water with enough pressure in
the consumption point.
The piping in the water supply network shall consist of ductile iron or high density polyethylene
pipelines and fittings, for the main pipelines connecting the reservoirs with the buildings. In the
network inside the buildings, the piping shall consist of galvanized iron pipes and fittings. As far
as possible all piping inside the building shall run in shaft or ducts provided for this purpose.
Outside the buildings, the piping shall be installed as far as possible 60 cm below finished grade.
Each zone shall contain independent variable speed booster pumping system for domestic water
supply. Further independent variable speed booster pumping system shall be provide for flushing
water supply. The booster system shall be fully equipped with pre-charged, non- toxic food grade
bladder.
All inlets, outlets, washouts, vents, ball cocks, overflows control valves and all such other piping
connections including level indicator shall be provided for water storage tanks.
Full way gate valves of approved make shall be provided as close to the underground tank as
practicable on every outlet pipe from the storage tank, except the overflow pipe. Overflow and
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 105 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
vent pipes shall terminate with mosquito proof grating.
The overflow pipe shall be so placed as to allow the discharge of water being readily seen. The
overflow pipe shall be sized accordingly. A check valve shall also be provided in the inlet water
connection to the tank. The outlet pipes shall be fixed approximately 75mm above the bottom of
the tank towards which the floor of the tank is sloping to enable the tank to be nearly emptied
for cleaning.
The pipe sizing shall be based on fixture unit calculation as per Plumbing engineering and Design
development (ASPE) standard. The pipe size of riser shall be restricted to nearest 100 mm
diameter size to optimize on capital cost, and for ease of installation and maintenance. However,
the maximum velocity in the water supply piping shall not exceed 2.4 m/s.
Water meters shall be provided in identified areas for water consumption recording for
efficient monitoring and assessment. Head losses through water meter shall be accounted for in
water distributions calculations.
Colour coding for non-potable domestic and potable water supply piping shall be ensured for clear
identification of the piping.
The horticulture water supply system comprising of pumping, piping, water supply nozzles and
control equipment shall be designed and built by the appointed irrigation water supply vendor.
Water for irrigation of lawns shall be sourced from recycled treated water from STP.
9.3 Drainage Facilities
9.3.1 Storm Water Drainage Planning
The drainage system for Dwarka has been designed by DDA for the total catchment area of entire
Dwarka Project on the basis of storm intensities and 70% average run off. The existing natural
gradient towards Najafgarh drain side makes it vastly economical and eminently sensible
to use the natural slope to its advantage for working out a proper drainage system. It is proposed
to construct six major out fall drains which shall carry the discharge of Zone K II. These drains
will pass through the connected green areas so as to merge with the landscaping of adjoining
green. Few retention ponds have been proposed along with the Najafgarh drain which should
receive the discharge from the outfall drain. These should also help to raise the water table of
the surrounding area and could be used for water sports etc. The capacity of drain is about 3000
to 8000 cusecs in different segments with very gentle gradient of 1 in 25000. This drainage
system should take care of the requirements of the Railway Terminal Area.
A nallah is crossing the station site area near the northern boundary of the site which
connects to the Najafgarh drain. This would be adequate for taking care of the storm
water requirements.
9.3.2 Drainage Network in Bijwasan Station Area
The drainage network has been proposed as a gravity drainage system, if possible.
The rainfall flow shall be collected by surface elements such as gullies or longitudinal gutters
and shall be conducted by a network of secondary collectors to the main collector. The main
collector will carry the water to the discharge point connected to the city’s existing
network.
The following picture shows the proposed drainage network.
Figure 67: Proposed Bijwasan Station Area Drainage Network
The drainage system shall be designed to discharge the maximum rainfall. It occurs on the
wettest months (June-September) and subject to Monsoon rainfall, with moderate rainfall
and temperatures ranging from 22 to 28 °C (72 to 82 °F). Most of the 722mm (28.4inches)
of annual rainfall in the city fall between June and September, and July is the wettest month
of the year. Hailstorms are also common in this region.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 106 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Following the design criteria of the Development Plan of the zone KII (Dwarka), the drainage
system has been designed for a total catchment area on the basis of storm intensities and
70% average run off.
According to Indian Meteorological Department, for the calculation of the rainfall flow, it
has been assumed a rainfall intensity of 100 mm/hr for a 1:50 year return period.
Taking in account this initial data, the maximum run off flow has been calculated using the
Rational Equation.
Q=C.I.A
The Rational equation requires the following units:
Q = Peak discharge, m3/h
C = Rational method runoff coefficient
I = Rainfall intensity, mm/hour
A = Drainage area, m2
The Rational method runoff coefficient (c) is a function of the soil type and drainage basin
slope.
The Rainfall intensity (i) is typically found from Intensity/Duration/Frequency curves
for rainfall events in the geographical region of interest.
N T I C S Flow Flow
years
hours
mm/h
m2
m3/h
l/s
50 1.00 100 0.7 17,00,000 1,19,000 33,055.6
Table 38: Bijwasan Station Run-off Flow Calculation
With this flow value, it is expected that the diameter of the main collector (blue) should be
between 2.4 and 3.2 m, depending on the slope and other installation conditionings.
To avoid the erosion of the collector due to the sand transportation on the flow, the water
velocity shall be less than 2 m/s as is indicated in India Railway Works Manual 2000.
A suitable letter has already been addressed to the Chief Engineer Delhi Development
Authority Dwarka on 7th July 2013 requesting confirmation of their ability to discharge
this runoff through municipal drains.
9.4 Sewerage Facilities
9.4.1 Assessment of Future Sewage loads for the World Class Station and related
Commercial Development
The sewerage network will collect the sewage water from buildings separately from storm
water drainage.
The total flow of sewage water that will generate the Bijwasan Station area is directly
related to the water supply flow. The daily flow of sewage water will be the 80% of the daily
flow of supplied water subtracting the irrigation flow that will be infiltrated to the terrain.
Entire sewage load generated by the Bijwasan Station area would be treated at their
proposed STP
PHASE-1
Table 39: Sewage Water Discharge in Bijwasan Station Estimation Phase-1
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 107 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
As a conclusion, the Bijwasan Station will generate approximately 4686 m3/day of Sewage
discharge and 4217 m3/day of Recycled water.
PHASE-2
Table 40: Sewage Water Discharge in Bijwasan Station Estimation Phase-2
As a conclusion, the Bijwasan Station will generate approximately 4674 m3/day of Sewage
discharge and 4207 m3/day of Recycled water.
The daily flow of sewage water is calculated as 80% of the daily flow of supplied water. After
sewage treatment, 90% of the sewage water is calculated as recycled water.
Figure 68: Proposed Bijwasan Station Area Sewage Network
9.4.2 Proposed Sewage Disposal of the Remodelled Station and Related Development
As per DDA Development Plan, Zone K II will generate about 48 MGD and sewerage discharge.
A Sewage Treatment Plant has been constructed in Dwarka. The location of Sewage
Treatment Plant is guided by gradient and site conditions. The sewerage system consists of
gravity main, sewage pumping station (SPS) and rising. The STP is located adjoining
Najafgarh drain which will carry treated discharge for disposal and some of treated
sewage shall be used for maintaining proposed green areas.
The proposed sewer lines in Bijwasan Station area will be connected to the trunk sewer
system of Delhi Municipal Corporation, to lead the sewage for treatment in the MCD’s STP.
Chief Engineer DDA Dwarka has already been addressed on 7 July, 2013 to confirm that their
trunk sewers and STP would be able to handle the load of sewage water foreseen in Bijwasan
Station area.
9.4.3 Required Infrastructure
9.4.3.1 Sewage Treatment System
A. CONVENTIONAL – ATTACHED GROWTH FOLLOWED BY ULTRA-FILTRATION
Phase - 1
From the data obtained, the demand of sewerage wastewater generated would be to the
tune of 4686 m3/day for phase I. Out of this, recyclable wastewater after treatment
would be 4217 m3/day. Operational flow rate 176 m3/hr through 24 hours.
Phase 2
From the data obtained, the demand of sewerage wastewater generated would be to the
tune of 4674 m3/day for phase II. Out of this, recyclable wastewater after treatment
would be 4207 m3/day. Operational flow rate 175 m3/hr through 24 hours.
Treatment methodology
The raw sewerage would be subjected to the following stage-wise treatment
(a) Screening – coarse & fine
(b) De-gritting
1. Homogenization
2. Anoxic treatment
3. Aeration thro blowers
4. Secondary clarification
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 108 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
5. Disinfection
6. Sludge recirculation (This is to maintain required MLSS in the AT)
(c) Sludge collection, treatment thro decanter
(d) Caking thro sludge drying beds
(e) Tertiary treatment – through sand & carbon filtration
(f) Ultra-filtration using medium pore-treatment (for recycling water)
Under the above technology, say about 10% would go waste, which may be disposed-off
to nearest sea / storm water drain.
B. MBR – Advanced Technology
Under this technology, we need to depend on overseas manufacturers only, however, they
are freely available in India through either their own office or through their distributors/
agents. Now widely recognized advanced technology which are being adopted many public
/ private industries to treat their effluent / sewage.
An advanced technology available with different kind of modules, typically having pore size
of 0.4 – 0.5 micron, unlike Ultra filtration, which has pore size of 0.1 micron.
The treatment methodology up to aeration system is one and the same as conventional
treatment system, after which an MBR tank is deployed where membrane modules are kept
inside the tank. A sucking pump will be used to suck the permeate through the membranes
pores, which permeate will have the recycling water quality.
Typical MBR skid, which can handle up to 600 KLD, we can install in multiple nos. to treat
sewage.
Figure 69: Typical MBR Unit
9.4.3.2 Recycling of Wastewater
Recycling of wastewater has been proposed as it proves to be the most essential and reliable
option in view of sustainability and judicious use of available water resources, it is desirable
to consider the option of re-using the treated waste water for non-potable uses such as for
horticulture and gardening and residential flushing after achieving required degree of quality
for the desired purpose of usage.
9.4.3.3 Sewage Network
The sewerage system usually consists of a collection system of sewers and connections to
building network, main sewers and pumping stations, water treatment plants and disposal
system.
Sewer pipe material will be selected considering the provisions of the NBC-2005. Considering
its use in public buildings, heavy duty long life pipes are recommended. The alternative
materials are usually Stone Ware Glazed, Reinforced Concrete, Polyethylene, and UPVC.
Suitable manholes of prescribed sizes as per the relevant BIS Specifications/ National
Building code will be provided in the sewage system, at all junctions and at all points of
change of sewer size, gradient and direction.
Manholes should be cement concrete and masonry works. Manhole covers and frames shall
conform to the requirements of IS: 1726-1960. Gully traps at the feet of all waste pipes shall
be salt glazed. Grease traps shall be provided on kitchen waste line before it is connected
with main sewer lines. Catch basins shall be provided with cast iron gratings with
frame for effective collection and disposal of surface storm water.
Sewer manholes can be built of Reinforced concrete, Brick or Pre-cast concrete rings as per
relevant BIS standards and specifications.
9.5 Fire Fighting
The main objective of the fire protection systems is the detection and suppression the fire
at early stage. Also, it will alert the building personnel to orderly evacuate to point of safety.
The provided fire systems will be the following:
Fire Detection and Alarm Systems
Fire Protection Systems.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 109 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The chapter is focused in Railway Station and furthermore it is included the main lines to
be applied in the other buildings and surroundings areas
9.5.1 Codes and Standards
The basic code being followed for the Railway Station is NFPA-130. (It is understood from
the Manual on World Class Stations that this is the standard, for fire and life safety, for the
development of all world class stations by IR). The provisions of this code will be
supplemented for the design of the various sub systems as per related detailed codes for
different individual items, issued by NFPA. The important ones are listed below
Means of Egress/Evacuation Time Calculations NFPA-130/ NFPA-101
Fire Hydrants and Hose Reels NFPA-14
Automatic Sprinklers Systems NFPA-13/ IS:15105
Fire Pump, Fire Water Tanks NFPA-13/NFPA14; NBC–Pt.4
Wet Risers, Hydrants System NFPA-130; IS: 3844, IS: 13039
Automatic Gas Flooding System NFPA-2001
Portable Fire Extinguishers NFPA-10/ IS: 2190
Fire Detection & Alarm System NFPA -72/IS: 2189/IS: 15908
Smoke Extraction System NFPA-92/ NFPA-130
Emergency Lighting NFPA-130/ NFPA-70
Fire Stops/ Compartmentation NFPA-101/130;NBC–Pt.4
All fire protection systems in the Commercial/Retail/Residential areas would also be
designed to comply with the National Building Code Part-4 and the requirements of the Local
Fire Authority.
9.5.2 Railway Station
As specified in Manual for Standards and specifications for Railway Stations, Bijwasan railway
Station will be provided with automatic and manual suppression systems. Fire Detection and
Alarm Systems
All Common personnel areas and public areas
Offices
Critical Rooms
Electrical Rooms
Mechanical Rooms,
Workshops, trash room.
Automatic suppression systems shall be provided in:
Nonpublic areas with combustible loads (concessions areas, storage and trash
rooms)
Public areas (Escalators structures and enclosed public waiting areas)
Standpipe Systems: throughout the station
Portable firefighting equipment
9.5.2.1 Fire Detection and Alarm Systems
The fire alarm system shall be installed in the Railway Station. Related with its own activity,
each building area has its own hazard characteristic which will demand its own specific
alarm system, for instance public spaces shall be equipped with optical smoke sensors,
technical rooms shall be equipped with smoke sensors, mechanical rooms shall be equipped
with multi criteria sensors, etc. Critical rooms, such as main Communications room, shall be
equipped by aspirated sensors system to offer the most early and reliable fire detection.
The Fire Alarm System must be capable of interfacing with others systems such as, voice
evacuation system, fire extinguishing system, smoke extraction/ventilation system, train
SCADA/signaling system, etc. In emergency situation, the communication system, connected
to Fire Alarm Control Panels and to the Operating Control Center (OCC of IDR), shall provide
the safest procedure to follow.
The fire alarm system will have a -centralized in the local control room in the station system
The BMS (Building Management System) will interface with Fire Alarm System and allow
monitoring of the complete system. The monitoring features of the BMS of the fire alarm
system will include:
System status (Healthy, fault, alarm)
Loop status
Detector status
Planned Maintenance.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 110 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The fire alarm system for the project Buildings will harness the latest fire alarm technology
and be an advanced, expandable and scalable system.
The system will be an analogue addressable system and will be electrically supervised,
monitor the integrity of all conductors and will have proper approval from nationally
recognized agencies.
The system will be capable of providing the user with clear comprehensive information in
the event of a fire and also provide an entire historic log of the system’s management
information. Faults within the system will provide a detailed explanation allowing the user
to navigate through the faults history.
Fire Alarm Control Panel (FACP) located at Local Control room inside of the building to
control & monitor the fire devices.
The devices included in the fire detection and alarm systems are composed by
1. Initiating Devices
A combination of Photoelectric Smoke Detectors, Heat Detectors, Aspirating
Detector etc. will be used in the following areas:
All Common personnel areas,
Offices
Critical Rooms
Electrical Rooms
Plant Rooms
Workshops
In all areas with high background noise levels, xenon beacons will also be provided
in line with NFPA – 72. As per NFPA-72 addressable manual call point units will be
mounted in corridors within 1.5 meters of the entrances or exits or fire escape
route with a maximum travel distance of 60 meters to the nearest manual call point
unit.
Furthermore the NFPA – 72 international standard, in the design shall be applied the
Indian Standards: IS: 2189/IS: 15908
2. System Circuit Supervision
The fire alarm control panels will supervise all circuits to intelligent devices,
transponders, annunciators and peripheral equipment and annunciate loss of
communication with these devices. Interface unit will also be provided to monitor
the firefighting system components such as sprinkler system valves, standpipe control
valves, PRV, and main gate valves.
3. Interfacing with other systems
The FACP must have the ability to interface with other security, BMS, supervision of
sprinkler systems, smoke management systems, mechanical systems, etc. Following
are some of the 3rd party systems to be interfaced with the fire alarm system.
4. Systems/Devices to be monitored:
Clean Agent Gas - Control Panel
Pre-Action System
Smoke Extract Fan
Pressurization Fan
Damper associated with Smoke Extract Fan
Zone Control Valve for Sprinkler Pressure Switch & Supervisory Switch
Fire Pump Monitoring
Generator
5. Systems/Devices to be controlled
Sounder Circuit / Strobe Circuit
Access Control System
Smoke Extract Fan
Damper associated with Smoke Extract Fan
Pressurization Fan
AHU Shut Down
Fire Door
BMS System
Lighting Control
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 111 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The fire alarm system will be developed in coordination with the firefighting strategy
and fire engineering design and all other relevant disciplines in the following stages
of design to ensure the system meets with all requirements and codes.
9.5.2.2 Fire Protection Systems
The following fire protection systems shall be provided for the Station as applicable:-
In the Station, the fire protection system shall assure the safety in all escape routes and in
all critical equipment. Different types of fire protection systems such as automatic sprinkler
system, standpipe and hose system, portable fire extinguishers and automatic gas
suppression system shall be combined.
The following systems will be provided inside the building:
1. Standpipe and Hose System
The standpipe and hose system consists of galvanized steel pipes, hose valves, hose
pipes, branch pipe with nozzles, first-aid hose reels. All these equipment shall be
placed inside the fire hose cabinet.
Each hose point shall be tapped off from the combined system risers and serve the
corresponding floors. Minimum size required to hose point tapping shall be 65mm.
Each internal hose point shall consist of hose valve, associated piping, 2 nos. of hose
pipes, 1 no. of nozzle and fire aid hose reel of 36 m long x 19 mm dia with an isolation
valve.
The first aid hose reel shall be tapped of from the riser and minimum size required
for the tapping shall be 25mm.
Common breeching inlet for sprinkler and standpipe system shall be provided.
Standpipe and hose system design shall be in accordance with NFPA 14 and in
accordance with IS:3844 and IS:884.
Fire water demand for standpipe and hose system shall be computed based on
cumulative water demand of 2 hose points for a single riser and maximum of 3 hose
points for more than one riser.
Number of hose points per floor / level shall be based on 60 m coverage per hose point.
Fire water storage required shall be calculated for minimum 60 minutes of total water
demand of the standpipe and hose system.
2. Automatic Sprinkler System, and its main characteristics are
The automatic sprinkler system consists of galvanized steel pipes, alarm check valves,
zone control valves, flow switches, pressure gauges, drain valves, test valves,
sprinkler heads, etc.
The sprinkler system main lines shall be tapped from the combined system risers and
serve the corresponding floor areas via the zone control valve. Zone control valves
shall be monitored and interfaced with BMS and flow switches shall be interfaced with
fire alarm system.
All the sprinkler heads shall be either pendent or upright of standard response and standard
coverage type and temperature rating shall be 68º C or 79º C.
All Zone Control Valve (ZCV) shall be of monitored butterfly valve type and drain & test
valve shall be of ball valve type.
Common breeching inlet for sprinkler and standpipe and hose system shall be provided.
Automatic sprinkler system design shall be in accordance with NFPA 130 and NFPA 13.
Fire water storage computation for sprinkler system shall be based on minimum 60 Minutes of sprinkler operation. Sprinklers shall be provided for all the floor / grade levels such as mezzanine, and for areas
such as MEP rooms, building office rooms, building service rooms, etc.
Sprinklers shall not be required for electrical risk areas which shall be protected by clean
agent gas flooding system.
3. Portable Fire Extinguishers
In general, all the different spaces shall be protected by means of portable
extinguishers and it shall be selected based on the class of fire. The standard for selection
and installation is NFPA 10.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 112 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The following type of fire extinguishers shall be provided corresponding to the class of fire.
Class A fire - ABC type
Class B fire - ABC type
Class C fire - CO2 type
All the fire extinguishers shall be placed inside the extinguisher cabinet or mounted in wall
by using the wall hooks.
4. Automatic Gas Suppression System
The automatic gas suppression system consists of Clean Agent gas inside the
gas cylinders, solenoid valves, manifolds, carbon steel pipes (seamless sch.40), and
gas discharge nozzles, etc., as part of mechanical items.
The electrical part of the system consists of gas release panels, wirings, abort
switches, manual releases, sounders and fire detectors.
Additionally, warning signage shall be provided at the entrance of the rooms to be
protected. The fire detectors shall be smoke or heat detector type. Fire detectors
shall wired based on cross zoning principle in order to avoid false discharge of gas.
The fire condition signal shall be interfaced to the main fire alarm panel through the
gas discharge panel.
In general, all the electrical risk rooms and areas shall be provided with total flooding
automatic gas suppression system. The gas agent shall be FM-200.
Electronics and telecommunication room
Electrical rooms
Generator rooms
Power supply rooms
Control rooms
5. Fire water storage and fire pumps
According to NFPA 13, standpipe systems shall be provided with an approved water
supply capable of supplying the system demand for a minimum of 1 hour. Taking into
account that the maximum flow rate expected will be about 3430 l/min (according
NFPA 14 – two fire hose of 947 l/min (250gpm) and 300m2 of sprinklers simultaneous),
the firefighting tank shall have a capacity of about 200 m3.
The Station shall be fitted out with a Fire Water Tank of 200 m3 and a Main Fire Pump,
a diesel engine operated Standby Fire Pump and a Jockey Pump. The Fire Pumps would
be in automatic operation mode. The Fire Pumps would be common to the Hydrant
and Sprinkler Systems. However, for Sprinklers there would be a dedicated mains right
from the fire pump delivery manifold.
The fire pump shall be designed and installed based on NFPA 20 standard. The fire
tanks shall be fitted with alarm detection, which shall be monitored by the Station
Fire Alarm Panel and Repeater Panel.
9.5.3 Mix and Other Uses
Regarding the surrounding buildings, each building will have its own automatic and manual
suppression systems. According to NFPA 14, standpipe systems shall be provided with
an approved water supply capable of supplying the system demand for a minimum of half an
hour (30 min). Taking into account that the maximum flow rate expected for each building
will be about 2918 l/min ((according NFPA 14 – two fire hose of 947l/min (250gpm) and
200m2 of sprinklers simultaneous), each building will have a firefighting tank of about 100
m3.
9.6 Power supply
In the following chapter, load estimation for Bijwasan station and surrounding buildings will
be done taking into account the surface of each building and the expected use.
9.6.1 Basis of Design
To determine the electric power considering the following design parameters:
1. Design surfaces
Railway station and Railway Station Parking
Railway facilities
Mixed Uses
It is considered to be allocated for the following uses according to the following
percentages:
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 113 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
9.5% retail
5% Hotel use
85.5% Office use
Open Space
Yard Plan
2. Power supply is required for the following subsystems
Lighting
Receptacle loads
Air conditioning and / or ventilation
Hot water (gas can be used instead)
3. Rates of the electric load estimation, taking into account the possible uses to be included:
ELECTRICAL LO ADS REQUIRED [VA/m2]
USE BUILDING/AREA lighting
Rec eptac le
loads
air
c onditioning
/ ventilation
hot water
Railway station 5 [3] 15.0 21,6 2.0
Railway fac ilities 5 [3] 15.0 44.0 2.0
Parc el logistic 3 [4] 3.0 33 [1] 0.0
Hotel 22 [4] 11.0 65 [1] 25 [1]
Commerc ial 33 [4] 3 [1] 44 [1] 0.0
O ffic e 39 [4] 11 [1] 65 [1] 6 [1]
Residential 33 [4] 11,0 44.0 25 [1]
Underground parking 6 [4] 0.0 20.0 0.0
Table 41: Power Rates per Area
The electrical rate of air conditioning and ventilation in Railway Station is an average
where is considered:
3.6% of total area: 65 VA/m2 to feed air conditioning/ventilation
Business lounge (621.18 m2)
VIP lounge (621.18 m2)
Reserved areas (4588.82 m2)
96.4% of total area: 20 VA/m2 to feed ventilation
The area of Railway Station is the total area included basement, ground floor and first
floor. The platform area is not included
9.6.2 Estimated Electrical loads
The estimated load requirements parameters are in accordance with the following standards
[1] IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Power Systems in Commercial
Buildings.
IEEE Std 241-1990
[2] National Building Code of India
[3] Manual for standards and specifications for railway stations. Ministry of
Railways
(Railway Board). Government of India
[4] NFPA 70. American National Electrical Code. 2008 Edition
The Electrical Power Load Calculation in Bijwasan Station Development for Phase-1 & Phase
2 are given in the table: Table nº 43 & 44. Once the electric load estimation has been
calculated, in order to know the simultaneous required power, the following demand factors
have been considered:
Table 42: Lighting Load Demand Factors
Fixed electric space heating loads shall be computed at 100 % of the total connected load,
as specified in NFPA 70, American National Electrical Code. 2008 Edition
Lighting load demand factors
Type of occupancy
Portion of Lighting Load to which
demand factors applies (VA)
Demand factor [%]
Hotels
≤ 20,000 VA
From 20,001 to 100,000 VA
Remainder over 100,000 VA
50 %
40 %
30 %
Dwelling units
≤ 3,000 VA
From 3,001 to 12,0000 VA
Remainder over 120000
100 %
35 %
25 %
Warehouses (storage)
≤ 12,500 VA
Remainder over 12,500
100 %
50 %
All others
100 %
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 114 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Regarding the air conditioning and ventilation, 70% of the total connected loads have been
considered. Furthermore, taking into account the different uses of the planned facilities, a
global demand factor of 0.7 has been considered.
The following results of the electric load estimation are shown, once the demand factors
have been applied:
The power required for BIJWASAN station for phase-1 & phase 2 are given in the tabular
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
11.3 Environmental setting of the project
Table 57: The Environmental setting of the activity area is presented
11.4 Relevant Extract of the Schedule of EIA notification
EIA Notification issued by the then MOEF and present MOEF&CC, GOI in 2006 under the
EPA, 1986 have not included the infrastructure projects of Railways and as such does not
attract the notification. However, the notification attracts for Building or Construction
Projects or Area Development Projects and Township having greater than threshold limits
of BUA requiring prior EC from the SEIAA/MOEF&CC in the absence of the state level
committees. The extract of the schedule of EIA notification is presented in Table 58.
Project or Activity Category with threshold limit Conditions if any
A B
8(a) Building and Construction projects
≥20000 sq m and
<1,50,000 sq m of built up area
The term “built up area” for the purpose of this Notification the built up or covered area on all the floors put together including its basement and other service areas, which are proposed in the building or construction projects.
Note 1.- The projects or activities shall not include industrial shed, school, college, hostel for educational institution, but such buildings shall ensure sustainable environmental management, solid and liquid waste management, rain water harvesting and may use recycled materials such as fly ash bricks.
Note-2.- “General Conditions” shall not apply.
8(b) Townships and Area Development projects.
Covering an area of > 50 ha and or built up area > 1,50,000 sq m
A project of Township and Area Development Projects covered under this item shall require an Environment Assessment report and be apprised as Category ‘B1’ Project.
Note. - “General Conditions” shall not apply.
Table 58: Relevant Extract of the Schedule of EIA notification
Sl.
No
Particulars Details
1 Project “Building Construction (Mixed Use)
Component” in the Development of
Bijwasan Railway Station at Dwaraka in New
Delhi on the Indian Railway Network
2 Climatological conditions
a) Nearest Indian Meteorological Centre New Delhi
b) Annual mean temperature, min 0C
(range 0C)
18.75
(7-27)
c) Annual mean temperature, max 0C
(range 0C)
30
(18-39)
d) Normal rain fall, mm 617
3 Topography Plain
Elevation above MSL, m 214
4 Present Land use The existing Land use of the surrounding
area is primarily Residential (villages like
Bagdola, Bhartal, Bijwasan and Dwarka sub-
city), Industrial (proposed integrated
freight complexes) and Transportation
(proposed ISBT Dwarka).
5 Nearest water body Pond
6 Nearest Airport Indira Gandhi International (1.6 km)
7 Protected areas as per the Wildlife
Protection Act,1972 (National Parks,
wildlife sanctuaries, community
reserves and conservation reserves)
Non within 10 km radius from the boundary
of the project area.
8 Reserved/Protected Forests Non in the study area
9 Seismicity Zone IV
10 Defense Installations None in the study area
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 138 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Since the present proposal exceeds the threshold limit 150000 sq m BUA becomes Category
B with ‘B1’ tag requiring prior EC from SEIAA, Delhi on the appraisal of SEAC, Delhi on the
basis of EIA/EMP study. Accordingly Form 1, Form 1A and Pre Feasibility Report have been
submitted to SEIAA, Delhi for their scoping and appraisal. Its appraisal is awaited.
Recently, MOEF&CC have amended the EIA notification vide their No. S.O. 3999 (E dated
09-12-2016 through which, inter-alia, the threshold limits have been changed. The
relevant extract of the notification is presented in Table 1.3. Aggrieved parties have
challenged the maintainability of the amended notification before NGT and its
admission is pending before it.
Project or Activity Category with threshold limit Conditions if any
A B
8 (a) Building and
Construction projects
> 20,000 sq m and < 1,50,000 sq m of built up area
The term “built up area” for the purpose of this notification is the built up or covered area on all floors put together including its basement and other service areas, which are proposed in the buildings and construction projects. Note 1. The projects or activities shall not include industrial shed, universities, college, hostel for educational institutions, but such buildings shall ensure sustainable environmental management, solid and liquid and implement environmental conditions given at Appendix-XIV. Note 2.-General Condition shall not apply. Note 3.-The exemptions granted at Note 1 will be available only for industrial shed after integration of environmental norms with building permissions at the level of local authority.
8 (b) Townships and Area Development projects
≥ 3,00,000 sq m of built up area or Covering an area ≥ 150 ha
≥1,50,000 sq m and < 3,00,000 sq m built up area or covering an area ≥ 50 ha and < 150 ha
Note.- General Condition shall not apply”.
Table 59: Relevant Extract of amended notification
Since the project BUA is much greater than the threshold limit of 300000 sq m becomes
‘A’ Category project requiring the project’s appraisal at central level by EAC and EC from
MOEF&CC from central level.
11.5 Review of Applicable Environmental Regulations
A review of the all applicable laws, regulations, notification and existing Institutions
relevant to the environmental issues in this project at the National/State levels are
presented here. The Government of India has laid out various policy guidelines, acts and
regulations for protection of environment, which have been summarized in the Table 60.
Act/Rules/Regulations Year Objective
Applicabi
lity
Yes/No
Responsible
Institution
The Environment
(Protection) Act.
1986
To protect and
improve the
overall
environment
Yes
MoEF&CC,
CPCB, DPCC
Notification on
Environment Impact
Assessment of
Development projects
(and amendments)
(referred to as the
Notification on
Environmental
Clearance)
2006
To provide
environmental
clearance to new
development
activities
following
environmental
impact
assessment.
No
MoEF&CC/
EAC
DEIAA/DSEA
C
The Water (Prevention
and Control of Pollution)
Act (and subsequent
amendments)
1974
To provide for the
prevention and
control of water
pollution and the
Yes
This Act
will be
applicable
DPCC
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 139 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Act/Rules/Regulations Year Objective
Applicabi
lity
Yes/No
Responsible
Institution
maintaining or
restoring of
wholesomeness of
water.
during
constructio
n for
establishme
nts
of hot mix
plant,
constructio
n
camp,
workers'
camp etc.,
as well as
during their
operations.
The Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act
(and subsequent
amendments)
1981
To provide for the
prevention,
control and
abatement of air
pollution
Yes
This Act
will be
applicable
During
constructio
n for
establishme
nt
of
constructio
n
workers'
camps etc.
and
operation
of air
pollution
equipment
and
machinery
as well as
during their
operations
DPCC
Act/Rules/Regulations Year Objective
Applicabi
lity
Yes/No
Responsible
Institution
The Construction and
Demolition
Waste Management Rules
2016
For handling and
disposal of
construction and
demolition waste
Yes
During
constructio
n operation
stages
Local
Authority
DPCC
The Solid Waste
Management Rules 2016
For segregation,
collection,
handling and
disposal of
domestic wastes
Yes
During
constructio
n operation
stages
Local
Authority
DPCC
The Hazardous and
Other Wastes
(Management and
Transboundary
Movement) Rules
2016.
For collection,
storage and
handling of waste
oil and other HW
Yes
During
constructio
n operation
stages
DPCC,
CPCB
The Plastic Waste
Management Rules 2016
Restricted use
based on
threshold limits
Yes
During
constructio
n operation
stages
DPCC,
CPCB
The Noise Pollution
(Regulation
and Control)
Rules 2000
2000 To regulate and
control Noise
pollution
These Rules
will be
applicable
during
constructio
n stage for
constructio
n
equipment
and
vehicular as
well as
operation
stage for
Vehicular
noise.
DPCC
The Central Motor
Vehicle Act
1988
1989
To control
vehicular air and
noise pollution.
To regulate
Yes Delhi Transport
Department
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 140 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Act/Rules/Regulations Year Objective
Applicabi
lity
Yes/No
Responsible
Institution
The Central Motor
Vehicle Rules
development of
the transport
sector, check and
control vehicular
air and noise
pollution.
Provisions of GOI,
Ministry of Civil Aviation
Order S.O.84 (E)
14-
01-
2010
NOC for height
clearance
Yes Airports
Authority of
India
Table 60: Policy guidelines, Acts and Regulations for protection of Environment
11.6 Approaches to EIA
The methodology to be followed for this study, strictly, is in accordance with the
September 2006 notification together with its amendments and the technical guidance
manual prepared by the Administrative Staff College of India on behalf of MoEF&CC.
11.6.1 Development Control Norms
The permissible FAR on Site is 100. However we have achieved 84 FAR on the complete
master plan (Phase-1 & Phase-2) while, the phase 1 master plan utilizes only 30 FAR. The
height restrictions are regulated as per AAI norms as the station building falls under the
air funnel. This was also the prime factor, for designing the station building eccentric to
the platform. The master plan approval for transportation and circulation as received
from UTTIPEC and the subsequent approval from DUAC (vide letter no. 27 (01) 2016-DUAC
Code 10051627001) is based on the FAR of 100. Future Bijwasan Railway Station falls under
Dwarka sub-city, which belongs to zone-K and forms part of the urban extension plan.
The urban extension plan was prepared to accommodate the projected population and
was conceived to be developed in four phases. Dwarka sub-city forms part of Phase 1A of
the urban extension plan. The Area where this Master Plan is developed is in the zone
called K-II of zone development plan.
S. No
Use Premises Activities Permitted
Development Controls
Area under operation (%)
Area under building (%)
FAR*
Floor area that can be utilized for passenger accommodation
1.
Rail terminal/integrated passenger terminal
All facilities related to railway passengers, operations, goods handling, passengers change over facilities, including watch and ward, hotel.
70 30 100 15%
Table 61: Development Control Guidelines for Railway Station
11.7 Area Statement
The project is planned to be implemented in two phases, so is the component of Building
construction activities for mixed use purpose. In the first phase 20 buildings are proposed
in seven plots having total plot area of 256640.9 m2. The floor levels have varied between
G+3 and G+6. Total built up area would be 399579.19 m2. Details of plot areas and BUAs
are presented in Table-62. In final phase 35 Buildings are proposed in 9 plots having a
total area of 335054.9 m2. Summary of details is presented in Table-63.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 141 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Table 62:Details of Plot and BUA in Phase-1.
Table 63: Summary of area statement for phase to buildings
11.8 Water Source and Supply
The Bijwasan terminal is located in Zone K-II of DDA MPD 2021. As per Zonal Development
Plan published by DDA, based on the projected population, water supply demand for Zone
K II is estimated to be 60 MGD. This would be supplied by the proposed water Treatment
Plant at Masoodabad village adjacent to Zone K-II. Water source is DDA.
Water requirement for the Phase 1 of the project is 5858m3/day. Out of which
2378m3/day is the mixed use requirement. Similarly for Phase 2 project the water
requirement is 5842m3/day. Out of which 4187m3/day is the mixed use requirement.
Total water requirement for the entire project is 11700m3/day. Summary of water
requirements for Phase-1 and Phase-2 are presented in Table 1.8 and 1.9 respectively.
S. No. Building Plot Area
(m2 )
Floor
Level
BUA (m2 )
1 MU4A 28304.78 G+4 19868.05
2 MU5A 59135.34 G+3 27337.71
3 MU5B G+3 16370.74
4 MU5C G+3 15426.56
5 MU5D G+3 21600.51
6 MU6A 33742.88 G+6 33589.94
7 MU6B G+6 26954.62
8 MU6C G+6 15585.72
9 MU6D G+6 20731.43
10 MU7A 38321.32 G+6 28644
11 MU7B G+6 28623.98
12 MU8A 28566.88 G+6 13023.67
13 MU8B G+6 18245.52
14 MU8C G+6 17945.58
15 MU9A 40478.4 G+6 13339.48
16 MU9B G+6 17079.53
17 MU9C G+6 15541.77
18 MU9D G+6 12294.87
19 MU16A 28091.3 G+6 24576.4
20 MU16B G+6 12799.11
Total 256640.9
399579.19
S. No. Plot No Area in
m2
No of
Buildings
1 MU1 34837.1 2
2 MU2 23606.65 2
3 MU3 44550 6
4 MU10 32422.55 2
5 MU11 31557.32 4
6 MU12 42977.65 4
7 MU13 41396.25 4
8 MU14 40083.59 4
9 MU15 43623.78 7
Total 335054.9 35
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 142 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
S
.No.
Use Building/Area Typical
Ratem2/Person
Typical flow rates
(I/unit/day)
Total No. of
Person/Coaches
Surface
(m2)
Total
(m3/day)
Passenger/Guest/
Employee. Litre/
Capita
Surface
Litre/m2
1 Railway Station 0 25 0 64281 45782 1607
2 Platform Washing 0 0 5 35100 176
3 Apron washing 0 0 10 25545 255
4 Railway Facilities
5 Offices 0 45 0 1200 3600 54
6 Double storage 0 30 0 570 1730 17
7 power cabin 0 30 0 10 325 0.3
8 Maintenance 0 30 0 50 6934 1.5
9 Electric loco-shed 0 30 0 100 697 3.0
10 Electric loco office 0 45 0 10 213 0.5
11 Diesel loco office 0 45 0 11 218 0.5
12 Diesel loco shed 0 30 0 123 632 3.7
13 Power car shed 0 30 0 15 426 0.5
14 Washing plant 0 30 0 34 630 1
15 Computer
passenger
reservation
0 45 0 30 1507 1.4
16 Saloon siding 0 45 0 4 1843 0.2
17 Railway Housing 0 200 0 2085 24104 417
18 Mixed used
19 Commercial (Hotel-
5%)
10 180 0 1998 19979 360
20 Commercial
(Retail-9.5%)
3 38 0 12653 37960 481
21 Commercial(Office-
85.5%)
10 45 0 34164 341640 1537
22 Railway
operations/Washing
Yard
23 Carriage Watering 0 1200 0 364 0 437
S
.No.
Use Building/Area Typical
Ratem2/Person
Typical flow rates
(I/unit/day)
Total No. of
Person/Coaches
Surface
(m2)
Total
(m3/day)
Passenger/Guest/
Employee. Litre/
Capita
Surface
Litre/m2
24 Automatic Carriage
Washing
0 300 0 364 0 109
25 Cleaning of
Carriage
0 500 0 364 0 182
26 Open Space (Green
space or land
scaping)
0 0 2.25 95000 214
27 Total 647465 5858
Table 64: Summary details of Water requirement for Phase - 1
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 143 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
S
.No
.
Use
Building/Ar
ea
Typic
al
Rate
m2/P
erson
Typical
flow rates
(I/unit/da
y)
Total
No. of
Perso
n/Co
aches
Surf
ace
(m2)
Total
(m3/
day)
Water
Design
Norms Unit
Rate
Water
Demand
Passenger/
Guest/
Employee
.Litre/
Capita
Surfa
ce
Liter/
m2
Potabl
e
No
n
Pot
abl
e
Pota
ble
Non
Potabl
e
Railway
Station
0 25 0 39219 8561
5
980.4
75
10 15 392.
19
588.2
85
1 Mixed used
a Commercial
(Hotel-5%)
10 180 0 3518 1997
9
633.2
4
110 70 386.
98
246.2
6
b Commercial
(Retail-
9.5%)
3 38 0 22281 6684
3
846.6
78
23 15 512.
463
334.2
15
c Commercial
(Office-
85.5%)
10 45 0 60159 6015
90
2707.
155
30 15 1804
.77
902.3
85
2 Railway operations/Washing Yard
a Carriage
Watering
0 1200 0 208 0 249.6 1200 0 249.
6
0
b Automatic
Carriage
Washing
0 300 0 208 0 62.4 0 300 0 62.4
c Cleaning of
Carriage
0 500 0 208 0 104 0 500 0 104
d Open Space
(Green
space or
land
scaping)
0 0 2.25 1150
00
258.7
5
0 2.2
5
0 258.7
5
5842.
298
3346
.003
2496.
295
Table 65: Summary details of Water requirement for Phase - 2
11.9 Sewage Treatment Plant
The daily flow of sewage water will be the 80% of the daily flow of supplied water. Entire
sewage load generated by the Bijwasan Station area would be treated at the proposed
STP. Sewage generation per day in phase-1 and Phase-2 are presented in Table- 66 and 67
respectively.
S .No. Use Building/Area Tot. water
demand
(m3/day)
Sewage
Generation
(m3/day)
1 Railway Station 1607 1285.6
2 Plat-from Washing 176 140.8
3 Apron washing 255 204
4 Railway Facilities
5 Offices 54 43.2
6 Double storage 17 13.6
7 power cabin 0.3 0.24
8 Maintenance 1.5 1.2
9 Electric loco-shed 3.0 2.4
10 Electric loco office 0.5 0.4
11 Diesel loco office 0.5 0.4
12 Diesel loco shed 3.7 2.96
13 Power car shed 0.5 0.4
14 Washing plant 1 0.8
15 Computer passenger
reservation
1.4 1.12
16 Saloon siding 0.2 0.16
17 Railway Housing 417 333.6
18 Mixed used
19 Commercial (Hotel-5%) 360 288
20 Commercial (Retail-
9.5%)
481 384.8
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 144 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
21 Commercial (Office-
85.5%)
1537 1229.6
22 Railway
operations/Washing
Yard
23 Carriage Watering 437 349.6
24 Automatic Carriage
Washing
109 87.2
25 Cleaning of Carriage 182 145.6
26 Open Space (Green
space or land scaping)
214 171.2
27
5858 4686.88
28 Say 5858 4687
Table 66: Showing Sewage generation in Phase - 1
S .No. Use Building/Area T. Water demand (m3/day)
WW Generation (m3/day)
1 Railway Station 980.475 784.38
2 Mixed used
3 Commercial (Hotel-5%) 633.24 506.592
4 Commercial (Retail-9.5%) 846.678 677.3424
5 Commercial(Office-85.5%) 2707.155 2165.724
6 Railway operations/Washing Yard
7 Carriage Watering 249.6 199.68
8 Automatic Carriage Washing
62.4 49.92
9 Cleaning of Carriage 104 83.2
10 Open Space (Green space or land scaping)
258.75 207
11 Total 5842.298 4673.8384
12 Say 5842 4674
Table 67: Showing Sewage generation in Phase - 2
Domestic sewage generated in construction phase will be disposed off through septic tanks
followed by soak pits with approval from the competent authority.
Sewage generated during operation phase of the project is treated in STP. Modular type
9.5MLD plant for Phase-I and Phase-II is proposed.
11.10 Fire Fighting
The project proposal included all fire protections systems complying the codes and
standards of NFPA. Provision of Effective Controls and Building Management Systems such
as Automatic Fire Alarm and Fire Detection and Suppression System are made. Adequate
access to fire tenders should be provided.
11.11 Solid Waste
It is estimated that about 69000 commuters will be utilizing the proposed railway station
with an expected total solid waste generation of about 13.8MT (considering an average
200g/capita/day based on mixed use). During construction phase, construction materials
will be sold to recyclers. Unusable, excess construction debris will be disposed at
designated places in tune with the local norms. Solid wastes likely to be generated during
operation phase of the project are of domestic and commercial in nature. Segregated
wastes at source will be collected and placed at designated locations with prior approval
from the competent authority so as to pick-up the waste regularly by DMC or their
approved waste processor.
11.12 Power requirement
The electric power required for the project during operation is assessed and
presented in Table 68.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 145 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Building Type Electrical
load
(VA/m2)
Area in
m2
Load (MVA)
Railway
Station
44.8 165736 7.425
Parking of
railway
station
26 16552 0.430
Railway
facilities
66 23079 1.523
Railway
Housing
113 24104 2.724
Mixed uses 103 1103194 113.629
Open space 2.2 95000 0.209
Open space
(Phase 2)
2.2 115000 0.253
Yard Plan 2.2 422888 0.930
Total Load Estimation [MVA] 127.12
General demand factor 0.7
Power required from Supplier [MVA] 88.98
Table 68: Summary of the electric power required
The estimated demand for mixed use component of the project is 113.629 MVA which will
be met from the power utility DISCOM.
Towards energy conservation, lighting fixtures will be of LED, CFL, T-5 or T-8 lamps which
will help in saving energy and reducing heating load emitted by the light fixture. For street
lighting and water heating at common uses solar power will be tapped.
The HVAC system has been designed to meet the specifications based on National Building
Code of India 2005, supplemented by BIS, ECBC and other relevant codes.
Standby emergency generator system (50% DG backup has been assumed for railway
station)-2 No 1500kVA DG sets are proposed for the railway station.
11.13 Green Belt
The landscape of the project has been planned to provide a clean, healthy and beautiful
environment. A 10% of the total plot area is earmarked for landscape and green belt
development in the project
11.14 Baseline environment
The development / compilation of environmental baseline data is essential to assess the
impact on environment due to the project. The environment includes water, land, air,
ecology, noise, socio – economic issues etc., the information presented in this section
stems from various sources such as reports, field surveys and monitoring. The information
presented in the Chapter have been collected from various sources and field studies.
Climatological data was collected from meteorological office. Efforts have been made to
compile the data from other sources through desk research.
Majority of data on water quality, air and noise quality was collected from Secondary
sources Central Ground Water Board(South-West), Delhi Pollution Control Committee,
CPCB online Air Quality Monitoring Station. This data will be further utilized to assess the
incremental impact if any due to the project once primary monitoring is carried out.
11.14.1 General Environment
The average elevation of Delhi plains is around 178-200-m above MSL. River
Yamuna flows across the eastern flank of the city. Many small watercourses
intersect the terrain causing a variation in relief. However, average gradient of
terrain is gentle, of the order of 1 to 3-m/km. The area has mature topography
with isolated hillocks. The depth of water table is observed between 3 and 7-m
below ground level. Delhi receives two seasonal rainfalls. These are due to South
– West and North –East monsoons. About 75% of rainfall occurs during July to
September due to South – West monsoon. North – East monsoon is active during
December – April. The annual rainfall is 714mm. The ground water occurs in silty
to sandy layers of the alluvial sediments. The permeability varies from 0.5 to 8m
per day and transmissivity from 10 to 100sqm./day. The hydraulic gradient is
reported 1.3 to 2.0 km/m. The mean monthly maximum temperature are highest
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 146 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
in April – May – June (43-450C) and lowest during January (30C). Air humidity varies
through out the year but seldom drop below 20%. Winds are light to moderate 0.9
to 4.1m/sec while directions are mostly from North, Northeast and North – West.
Sky is moderately cloudy during July – August and generally clouds free for rest of
the year.
11.14.2 Water and Soil
The water and soil data from secondary sources have been collected and the
results are presented in Tables 69 and Table 70.
a. Ground water quality
Ground water is saline at deeper depths. Higher Iron content of 14 mg/l has been reported
at Daulatpur. Higher fluoride content of 2.05 mg/l is observed at Najafgarh.
S.No Chemical Constituents Range
1 pH 8.15-9.38
2 EC (µS/cm at 25ºC) 529-17240
3 Bicarbonate (mg/l) 123.46-355.83
4 Chloride (mg/l) 31.57-5639.53
5 Nitrate (mg/l) 11.3-462
6 Sulphate (mg/l) 2.3-1950
7 Fluoride (mg/l) 0.2-2.05
8 Calcium (mg/l) 15.35-429.9
9 Magnesium (mg/l) 21.62-1376.73
10 Total Hardness as CaCO3 (mg/l)
0-3807.88
11 Sodium (mg/l) 62.67-3318
12 Potassium (mg/l) 0.1-99.4
13 Iron (mg/l) 14
Source of information: Central Ground Water Board(South-West)
Table 69: General ranges of various chemical constituents in ground water
Electrical Conductivity in the district has been found to vary from 529 to 17240 µS/cm at
25ºC. Fluoride concentration in ground Water in the district varies from 0.2 to 2.05 mg/l.
Higher Nitrate concentration up to 462 mg/l is observed in the district.
b. Surface Water Quality
Surface Water Quality is taken from Delhi Pollution Control committee as Secondary source
and the results are presented from Table No70.
Source: Delhi Pollution Control Committee
Table 70: Surface Water Quality
11.14.3 Noise
Ambient Noise Levels Observed at Location Dwaraka presented in Table 15.
The observed values are compared to the Commercial area noise levels since the proposed
project houses no residential complexes.
The values are observed to be below the permissible limits prescribed for commercial
areas.
S.
No. Date
Sampling
Location pH
TSS COD BOD
Free
Ammonia
(as N)
Remarks
(mg/l
) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l)
Water Quality Criteria
for propagation of wildlife
and fisheries
6.5-8.5 _ - -
1.2mg/l or
less
1. 04/03/2010
Sample No.
Chhawala
Kaba Mohalla
7.5 138 324 80 2.6 Not meeting The Criteria
w.r.t Free Ammonia
2. 04/03/2010
Sample No
.3Chhawala
Kaba Mohalla
7.5 46 288 68 2.2 Not meeting The Criteria
w.r.t Free Ammonia
3. 04/03/2010
Sample No .3
Dirty water
entering
water body
7.3 82 207 60 3.1
Not meeting The Criteria
w.r.t Free Ammonia
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 147 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
NOISE LEVELS STANDARDS dB(A)
S.No. Standard For DAY NIGHT
1 Industrial Area 75 70
2 Commercial Area 65 55
3 Residential Area 55 45
4 Silence Zone 50 40
Table 71: Noise levels at Dwaraka
11.14.4 Air Quality
Baseline Air monitoring data collected from Secondary source CPCB online Air Quality
Monitoring Station at NSIT Dwaraka and is presented in Table-72
S.No Date PM2.5
µg/m3
SO2 µg/m3 NO2
µg/m3
CO
mg/m3
NAAQ Standards 60(24
hrs)
80(24 hrs) 80(24
hrs)
2(8 hrs)
1 14-01-2017 161.49 7.82µg/m3 60.5736 0.55
2 15-01-2017 180.38 5.05 68.432 0.57
3 16-01-2017 111.57 6.69 41.9052 0.35
4 17-01-2017 151.96 4.94 57.5656 0.52
5 18-01-2017 146.29 9.89 52.9972 0.43
S.No Date PM2.5
µg/m3
SO2 µg/m3 NO2
µg/m3
CO
mg/m3
6 19-01-2017 58.23 13.43 46.624 0.39
7 20-01-2017 85.14 17.38 73.1508 0.68
8 21-01-2017 126.4 18.34 81.9868 0.66
9 22-01-2017 116.7 16.51 87.9276 0.83
10 23-01-2017 121.49 13.35 77.9072 0.71
11 24-01-2017 218.37 16.70 166.5492 1.30
12 25-01-2017 109.22 14.12 50.4216 0.54
13 26-01-2017 123.27 8.30 40.8524 0.39
Table 72: AAQ data
From the above it can be seen that PM2.5 and NO2(on three occasions ) the values are found
to be beyond the NAAQ standards for 24 hrs
11.15 Flora of the Project area
Tree survey is being carried out in the project area. As such, no forest area exists. Since
it is an open piece of land most of the trees are native vegetation of the land. The main
species found during site visit which could be immediately identified commonly are Pipal,
Neem, Kikar, Eucalyptus, Ficus and Bakaan, etc. No rare or endangered species of trees
have been noticed during field studies. An inventory of trees, likely to be lost will be
presented in Detailed EIA Report.
11.16 Seismicity (State Disaster management plan)
Delhi is located in zone IV which has fairly high seismicity where the general
occurrence of earthquakes is of 5-6 magnitude, a few of magnitude 6-7 and occasionally
of 7-8 magnitude. Delhi thus lies among the high-risk areas.
Suitable seismic factor as per the India Meteorological Department (IMD) taking into
account adequate needs to be considered for design purpose for Civil Engineering
The city has been experiencing floods of various magnitudes in the past due to floods in
the Yamuna and the Najafgarh Drain system. The Yamuna crossed its danger level (fixed
at 204.83m) twenty five times during the last 33 years The details will be given in EIA
Report.
11.18 Socio-Economic Analysis
Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has earmarked land near this station for development
of directional terminal which has been acquired by the railways.
During social survey we made some observations on land details were collected, which are
as follows in Table 73:
Area Area in sq m
A Area under road/main line 229000
B Land acquired from DDA by
NR
1100700
Land under litigation
Anup Narang Farm 21854.862
Chawala and Jain Narang
Farm
15960.183
Cremation ground 4769.231
C Govt. Boys Senior
Secondary School
21115.3547
Mohammed Shahadadpur
Village
354799.4969
Grave yard 4261.645
Govt. Girls Senior
Secondary School
17300
Total land to be acquired 120060.7726
Total land (A+B+C) 1449747.12
Table 73: Observations on land details
11.19 Impact Identification, Analysis And Mitigation Measures
In order to assess the significance of the proposed project’s impacts, the impacts were
first identified from their source which are the project’s
activities/equipment/processes/materials and then the impact receptor which are the
baseline environmental and social conditions. This was carried out through the use of the
Impact Checklist Table 74 where the likely impacts were identified. The impacts were
then classified as either positive or negative. The impacts were lastly analyzed in terms
of their characteristics on the aforementioned baselines to define their significance by
using a matrix in order to identify the acceptable risk level.
Environmental aspect
Design Phase
Construction Phase
Operational Phase
Water Pollution
Air
Noise
Soil
Soil loss
Contamination
Compaction
Bio-Diversity
Loss of Flora
Loss of Fauna
Population and Social Dynamics
Population size
Diseases
Quality of Life
Employment
Utilities
Land uses
Others
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 149 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Environmental Opportunities
Economy
Landscape Design
KEY Denotes an Impact
Table 74: Checklist of Project's Likely Impacts
11.20 Analysis of Impacts
The positive and negative impacts likely in the proposed project are tabulated in Table
75 below.
Positive Impacts Negative Impacts
Design Phase
Creation of Employment and Business opportunities Generation of Income and Source for Government Revenue Environmental opportunities
Construction Phase
Creation of Employment Market for goods and services Increased population Increased Economic Activities and Revenue
Changes in Surface and Sub-Surface Hydrology Changes in soil characteristics Emission of Air pollutants Generation of Noise Increased Pressure on Utilities Increased Heavy Traffic Population Influx Generation of Construction Waste OHS Risks
Operational Phase
Increased Commercial Viability Creation of Employment Opportunities Increased Accommodation/Housing Increased Access to Goods, Services and Social Amenities Stimulation to Urban Development Aesthetic Enhancements Improved Roads Population Increase Impetus to Improve Amenities and Services
Increased Pressure on Available Utilities Increased Land Values and Land Use Changes Increased Air Pollution Increased Surface run-off Increased Traffic Generation of waste OSH Risks Generation of Noise
Table 75: Positive and Negative Impacts of Proposed Project
11.21 Mitigation Measures
The project’s significant impacts are analyzed, reviewed and mitigation measures are
proposed in Table 76 below that will enable the impacts to be managed, reduced or
avoided where possible.
Table 76: Likely/Residual impacts and Mitigation
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Construction Phase
Loss of Flora and Fauna Habitats
Landscaping with indigenous species on completion of construction.
Maintaining of landscaped gardens, terraces, conservation and management of the vegetation and lawns.
Clearing vegetation only in construction areas and demarcating areas where no clearing is required.
Low
Changes in surface and sub-surface hydrology
During construction, the design (of the drainage system) should ensure that surface flow is drained suitably into the public drains provided to control flooding within the site.
Drainage channels should be installed in all areas that generate or receive surface water such as car parking, driveways and along the building block-edges of the roofs.
The channels should be covered with gratings or other suitable and approved materials to prevent occurrence of accidents and entry dirt that would compromise flow of run-off.
The channels should be designed with regards to the peak volumes such as periods or seasons when there is high intensity of rainfall in the project area but just in case such an event occurs. They should never at any time be full due to the resulting heavy downpours.
The drainage channels should ensure the safe final disposal of run-off /surface water and should be self-cleaning which means it should have a suitable gradient.
Low
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 150 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Storm water generated from roof catchments should be harvested, stored and made use in various activities such as general cleaning. This will reduce run-off reaching the drainage channels.
Paving of the side walkways, driveways and other open areas should be done using pervious materials such as NFC1(No fine concrete) to encourage water recharge and reduce run-off volume
Changes in soil characteristics
Creating specific paths for the trucks
Ensuring there is enough space for normal percolation of water.
Preventing contamination from construction wastes by having specific sites for collection, sorting and transport of wastes.
Proper installation and configuration of drainage structures to ensure their efficiency.
Installing cascades to break the impact of water flowing into the drains.
Controlling the earthworks and ensuring the management of excavation activities.
Compacting areas with loose soil.
Landscaping.
Providing soil erosion control structures on the steeper areas of the site & controlling activities during the rainy season.
Medium
1 Maria Rasheeda and S.K. Rizvi, New Building Materials and Construction World, New Delhi. http://www.nbmcw.com/roads-pavements/5529-pervious-concrete-pavement-for-parking-areas-pathways-sustainable-porous-and-storm-water-drainage.html
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Emissions of Air pollutants
Sprinkling water on soil before excavation and periodically when operations are under way to prevent raising of dusts.
Enclosing the structures under construction with dust proof nets like tarpaulin.
Using efficient machines with low emission technologies for the ones that burn fossil fuels.
Controlling the speed and operation of construction vehicles.
Regular maintenance and services of machines and engines.
Use of clean fuels e.g. unleaded and de-sulphurized fuels.
Educate and raise awareness of construction workers on emission reduction techniques.
High
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 151 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Generation of Noise
Using equipment with noise suppressing technologies.
Providing workers with PPEs against noise e.g. ear plugs.
Placing signs around the site to notify people about the noisy conditions.
Regular maintenance of equipment to ensure they remain efficient and effective.
Complying with the noise regulation standards
Construction works should be carried out only during the specified time which is usually as from 0800 hrs to 20.00 hrs.
There should not be unnecessary honking of the involved machinery.
Provision of bill boards at the construction site gates notifying of the construction activity and timings
Medium
Increased Pressure on Utilities
Employing water conservation techniques and only using the required amounts of water to prevent wastage.
Employing power saving techniques such as switching off equipment when not in use, using natural light whenever possible.
Using machines with power saving technologies i.e. high efficiency equipment.
Providing proper sanitary facilities for construction workers.
Inspecting the drainage facilities regularly to ensure they are free of debris that may reduce their efficiency.
High
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Increased Heavy Traffic
Placing signs around the site notifying other vehicles about the heavy traffic and to set the speed limit around the site.
Ensuring all drivers for the project comply to speed regulations.
Making sure the construction doesn’t occupy the road reserves and complying to traffic and land demarcation obligations.
Ensuring all vehicles used for the project are in good working condition both legally and commensurate to their intended use.
Medium
Population Influx
Workers to be issued with job cards to monitor their movements in the site area
Only authorised personnel should be allowed entrance to the site
Presence of a work registry book where workers sign in and out
Educating the workers on proper sanitation methods
Sensitizing the worker on HIV/AIDS
Making available suitable facilities for the collection, segregation and safe disposal of the wastes.
Ensuring all waste is dumped in their designated areas and legally acceptable methods
Low to Medium
Generation of Construction waste
Employing proper waste management plan Using waste minimization techniques such as buying in required quantities with preplanned schedule of work.
Allocating responsibilities for waste management and identifying all sources of wastes, and ensuring wastes are handled by personnel licensed to do so.
Making available suitable facilities for the collection, segregation and safe disposal of the wastes.
Low
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 152 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Creating waste collection areas with clearly marked facilities such as colour coded bins and providing equipment for handling the wastes. The bins should be coded for plastics, rubber, organics, glass, timber, metals etc.
Ensuring all wastes are dumped in their designated areas and through legally acceptable methods and that the bins are regularly cleaned and disinfected.
Assessing and creating opportunities for Regulation, Reducing, Reusing, Recycling, Recovering and Rethinking of its probable usage.
Creating adequate facilities for the storage of building materials and chemicals and controlling access to these facilities.
Ensuring bins are protected from rain, animals and by chance trespassers.
OSH Risks Ensuring all potential hazards such as movable machine parts are labelled.
Raising awareness and educating workers on risks from equipment and ensuring they receive adequate training on the use of the equipment.
Providing the workers with adequate PPEs and monitoring regularly to ensure they are replaced on time when they wear out.
Placing visible and readable signs around where there are risks.
Ensuring there is security in and around the site to control the movement of people.
Providing safe and secure storage for equipment and materials in the site and maintaining MSDSs.
Placing visible and readable signs to control the movement of vehicles and notify motorists and pedestrians around and workers in the site.
Providing firefighting equipment and in easily accessible areas as well as ensuring site personnel
Low to medium
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
are well trained to use them as well as maintaining them regularly.
Labeling chemicals and material according to the risks they possess.
Creating safe and adequate fire and emergency assembly points and making sure they are well labeled.
Establishing emergency procedures against hazards and ensuring the workers stay aware/educated on following them and commensurate to the magnitude and type of emergency, by conducting regular drills and involving the neighbors.
Operational Phase
Increased Pressure on available utilities
Implementing water conservation techniques such as having faucets with dead man tap openers.
Using only the required amounts of water during normal operations.
Creating awareness through signs of conservation of water and electricity.
Using natural light during the day for lighting purposes.
Using machines and equipment with a high level of power efficiency in the offices and restaurants/hotels and servicing them as often as required to maintain their efficiency
Low
Increase Land Values and Land Use Changes
Complying to zoning by laws
Collaborating with public and planning officials on the development and future developments
Aligning the project’s objectives with those of national, and district development policies
Low
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 153 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Climate change
Advocating for the use of other renewable sources of energy such as wind and solar energy
Use of clean fuels e.g. unleaded and de-sulphurized fuels in vehicles
Paving should only be carried out where necessary to reduce the reflection of the solar radiations.
Landscaping the site with indigenous species of plants
Using sustainable drainage systems that mimic the natural percolation of water into the soil, and green roofs where possible
Using efficient equipment that emit little or no waste heat
Medium
Increased Air pollution
Install scrubbers in the exhausts of motor vehicles to filter the toxic fumes
Use of renewable energy
Use of de -sulphurized and unleaded fuels in vehicles
Banning the burning of wastes and other materials at the site.
Using efficient equipment, machines and engines that emit less pollutants
Low
Increased surface noff
Using materials that mimic natural percolation of water like(NFC).
Landscaping to ensure there are areas where water will percolate underground.
Ensuring the size of the drains to accommodate storm flows during the rainy season and Rainwater harvesting of
Low
Increased traffic
Erecting visible and clear signs to control the movement of vehicles in and out of the site.
Having alternative entrances and exits for emergency operations.
Low
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Placing signs around the site notifying other vehicles about the heavy traffic and to set the speed limit around the site.
Generation of waste
Developing and implementing a waste management plan.
Using waste minimization techniques as such required in the restaurants/hotels and canteens etc.
Allocating responsibilities for waste management and identifying all sources of wastes, and ensuring wastes are handled by personnel licensed to do so.
Making available suitable facilities for the collection, segregation and safe disposal of the wastes.
Creating waste collection areas with clearly marked facilities such as colour coded bins and providing equipment for handling the wastes. The bins should be coded for plastics, rubber, organics, glass, paper, electrical equipment etc.
Ensuring all wastes are dumped in their designated areas and through legally acceptable methods and that the bins are regularly cleaned and disinfected.
Assessing and creating opportunities for Regulation, Reducing, Reusing, Recycling, Recovering.
Creating adequate facilities for the storage of materials and chemicals and controlling access to these facilities.
Ensuring bins are properly covered
High
OSH Risks Employing and EHS/OSH plan.
Provision of PPEs to all personnel working in potentially hazardous areas or with potentially hazardous equipment, and replacing the PPEs on wear and tear.
Low
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 154 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Placing readable signs alerting people of hazardous such as for slippery floors.
Servicing equipment and machine to ensure efficiency.
Providing firefighting equipment and maintaining them to ensure they are fully functional.
Delineating fire and emergency assembly points and creating awareness to ensure all people at site are aware of them
e.g. through the use maps on elevators, staircases etc.
Putting in place and ERP and ensuring all people in the area are aware of it and the procedures to follow commensurate to the level of emergency.
Providing adequate storage for hazardous and flammable substances and controlling access to them.
Monitoring the movement, handling and management to ensure they safely managed and don’t present any EHS risks.
Working state agencies in the management of emergencies and disasters to ensure multilateral and inter-sectoral approaches to this management.
Performing emergency drills on a frequent basis, setting benchmarks for response and evaluating performance to ensure continuous improvement of response and preparedness.
Generation of Noise
Erecting signs and notifying other users of noisy activities.
Conducting all noisy activities during the day when permissible levels are higher.
Provision of PPEs such as ear plugs for employees working in noisy conditions or with noisy equipment.
Low
Likely Impact & Reference
Proposed Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Using equipment with low noise ratings or noise reduction technologies such as for the generators like noise dampers etc.
Vibration Control Vibration emanates from rail
To prevent development of surface irregularities on the rail, a fairly heavy rail section of 60-kg/m, 90 UTS, supported at every 60-cm. has been proposed. Further, rail grinding at regular intervals by Rail grinding machine and also lubrication of rail by vehicle-mounted lubricator have been contemplated.
Rail will be continuously welded and also will be laid to fine tolerances, so that any noise/vibration on account of irregular track geometry could be reduced.
The vibration generated from rail-wheel interaction will be greatly absorbed by the elastic fastening system proposed to be used.
Screening of noise to be arranged by providing parabolic noise reflecting walls on each sides of the track, along rail corridor where the mixed development is proposed.
Medium to Low
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 155 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
11.22 Environmental Management Plan
Based on environmental baseline conditions, planned project activities and its impacts
assessed, the set of measures to be taken during implementation and operation to avoid
or offset adverse environmental impacts or to reduce them to acceptable levels, together
with the action which needs to be taken to implement them are enumerated in Table 77.
S.N. Potential
Impact Action
Parameters for
Monitoring Timing
1. Air
Emissions
All equipments are
operated within
specified design
parameters.
Random checks of
equipment logs/
manuals
Construction
activities
Vehicle trips to be
minimized to the extent
possible
Vehicle logs
Site Clearance and
Construction
activities
Any dry, dusty materials
stored in sealed
containers or prevented
from blowing.
Absence of stockpiles or
open containers of dusty
materials.
Construction
activities
Compaction of soil during
various construction
activities
Construction logs Construction
activities
Ambient air quality
within the premises of
the proposed project to
be monitored.
The ambient air quality
will conform to the
standards for PM10,
PM2.5,SO2 and NOx,CO
and Pb
Construction
activities
as per schedule
Ambient air quality
within the premises of
the proposed project to
be monitored.
Exhaust from vehicles to
be minimized by use of
fuel efficient vehicles
and well maintained
vehicles having PUC
certificate.
The ambient air quality
will conform to the
standards for PM10,
PM2.5, SO2 and NOx, CO
and Pb as given by DPCC
Vehicle logs to be
maintained
During operation
phase
2 Noise
List of all noise
generating machinery
onsite along with age to
be prepared.
Equipment to be
maintained in good
working order.
Equipment logs, noise
reading
During
construction
phase.
Generation of vehicular
noise
Maintenance of vehicles
as per manufacturers
manual, speed limit of
20 kmph is to be
maintained
During
construction
phase.
Acoustic mufflers /
enclosures to be
provided in large engines
Leq dB(A) at 1m from
the equipment
As per the
requirement or
quarterly
whichever is
lesser.
3. Wastewater
Discharge
.
Septic tank followed by
soak pits for temporary
work camps erected.
Treatment of Waste
water through STP for
recycle and reuse
Construction Phase:
Visual inspection of
drainage and records
thereof.
Operational Phase
pH, BOD, COD, TSS, NH3
–N, N-Total and Fecal
coliform
During
construction
During operation
phase
4. Soil Erosion
Contour trenching, Slope
maintenance, sediment
basin, mulching, soil
stabilization and turf
grass are proposed to
protect the soil from
erosion during
construction and
operation phases.
-----
During
construction and
operational
phases.
5. Solid waste
Implement waste
management plan that
identifies and
characterizes every
waste arising associated
Comprehensive Waste
Management Plan in
place and available for
inspection on-site.
Prior to site
clearance,
constructional and
operational
phases.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 156 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
with proposed activities
and which identifies the
procedures for
collection, handling &
disposal of each waste.
Compliance with SW M
Rules, 2016 and C&D
Rules, 2016 and
Hazardous Wastes and
other (Management and
Transboundary Rules),
2016
6
Non-routine
events and
accidental
releases
Plan to be drawn up,
considering likely
emergencies and steps
required to
prevent/limit
consequences.
Mock drills and records
of the same
During
construction
phase
Table 77: Environmental Management Plan
11.23 Environmental Monitoring plan:
The environmental monitoring will be required during construction and operational
phases. The parameters need to be monitored are: Water Quality, Air quality and Noise
levels which are given in Table 78 & 79 .
Table 78: Environmental Monitoring Programme for Implementation during Project
Operational Phase
Table 79: Environmental Monitoring Programme for Implementation during Project
Construction Phase
11.24 Cost Of Environmental Monitoring
The estimated cost for Environmental Monitoring during construction phase and
operational phase is Rs 14.05 Lacs per year given in Table 80 & 81 respectively.
ITEM LOCATION PARAMETERS FREQUENCY
Ambient Air Quality At 6 locations in the
project area
PM10, PM2.5, SO2,
NOx,CO
Quaterly
Ambient Noise At 8 locations in &
around the complex
Day and night
equivalent noise level
Quaterly
Ground water At 6 locations As per standards Half Yearly
Surface water At 4 locations As per standards Half Yearly
Soil At 6location outside
the project site
As per standards Once in a Year
ITEM LOCATION PARAMETERS FREQUENCY
Ambient Air
Quality
At 6 location at
boundary and project
site
PM10, PM2.5,SO2, NOx &
CO
Monthly
Ambient Noise At 8 location at
boundary of the
project site
Day and night
equivalent noise level
Monthly
Surface water At 4 location nearest
to the project site
As per standards Monthly
Ground water At 6 location nearest
to the project site
As per standards Monthly
Soil At 6 location outside
the project site
As per standards Once in a Quarter
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 157 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
Particulars No of Location Frequency No of Samples Rate Cost
Ambient Air Quality 6 monthly 48 9500 456000
Surface water 4 monthly 32 3000 96000
Ground water 6 monthly 48 3000 144000
Noise 8 monthly 64 4000
256000
Soil 6 quarterly 48 3000 144000
Total 1096000
Table 80: The Cost Required for Implementation of Environmental Monitoring Programme
during Project Construction Phase
Particulars No of Location Frequency No of Samples Rate Cost
Ambient Air Quality 4 Thrice a year 12 9500 114000
Surface water 4 Thrice a year 12 3000 36000
Ground water 4 Thrice a year 12 3000 36000
Noise 8 Thrice a year 24 4000 96000
Soil 3 Thrice a year 9 3000 27000
Total 309000
Table 81: The Cost Required for Implementation of Environmental Monitoring Programme
during Project Operation Phase
11.25 Environmental Management System
The Environmental Management System constitutes provision of an Environmental
Division, which should be staffed by an Environmental Engineer/Officer, an Environmental
Assistant and two other assistants (miscellaneous works). The task assigned should include
supervision and co-ordination of studies, monitoring and implementation of environmental
mitigation measures. An Environmental Adviser shall review progress of the division every
year..
11.26 Cost Estimates
The cost required for implementation of Environmental Management Plan is estimated to
be about Rs.3187.00 lacs while recurring cost per year is estimated to be around Rs.747.00
lacs the details are given in Table 82
S.No. Capital Expenditure Cost(Rs. in
Lacs)
RecurringCost
(Rs.in lacs)
1. Green cover including 3yrs O&M 100 45
2. STP 1410 117
3. Recycling network 800 50
4. DG sets acoustic enclosures 100 300
5. Solid Waste Management 500 200
6. Rainwater Harvesting pits/tank(40pits)
(1MLD)
172 1
7. Environmental Monitoring Cost
14.05
8. Solar Power 105 20
Total 3187 747
* Capital Cost Included in the Project cost
Table 82: Capital Cost allocation for Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
The Environment Management Plan will be implemented in phases, so that optimum benefit could
be achieved and will be synchronized with the construction schedules.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 158 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
12 CAPEX
The estimated cost has been based on CPWD PAR 2013 and supplement 2013 published
by Central Public Works Department, Government of India. The Plinth Area Rates (PAR)
are considered reasonable and adopted all over India for estimation purposes of different
building works. These rates are applied per sq. m Built-up area. The CPWD DSR 2014 has
been further used to calculate the estimated costs of specific items of work not included
in PAR.
The areas used to calculate the above estimate is given below in the Table no 1.1
S. No. Description Floor Height (m) Area (Sq m)
1 Basement-1 (includes FOB) 5.85 18350.00
2 Ground Floor 7.0 9100.00
3 Ground Floor Stilted 7.0 11520.00
4 First Floor Roof 8.5 20470.00
5 First Floor Usable Area 17010.00
6 Superstructure (2+3+4) 41090.00
7 RCC (1+2+3) 38970.00
8 Total Building Area (1+2+3+4) 59440.00
9 Additional Area of Retaining Wall along the
Station Edge for the Sunken Road (Surface
Area)
2700.00
10 Arrival Area Sunken Road, Ramps,
Embankment and Retaining Wall
48200.00
11 Platform Area (4 Islands) – Flooring and
Shelter considered in costing
35100.00
12 Basement 1B (Two Tunnels) 3822.00
13 Basement Area for Access Ramps/ Staircases
to Tunnel (Finishes considered for costing)
4030.00
14 Non-Road Site Area 88605.00
15 Approach/ Exit Road Area 79275.00
16 Total Site Area (14+15) 167880.00
Table 83: Station Areas and Other Areas used for Cost Estimation
12.1 Station Structural and Architectural Building Works and Finishes Costing
The Internal Services costs are also added as per norms given in CPWD plinth area rate
Oct. 2012. For Items not covered in these plinth area rates, market rates have been
adopted. These cost estimates are approximates and are based on typical relationships
of quantities such as floor area/volume etc. The cost estimate is based on built-up
area/floor area worked out from the master plans and the plinth area rates applied to
arrive at reasonable costs for taking administrative and financial decisions. The
quantities are multiplied by unit rates to arrive at the estimated cost.
The total cost of the Station Building is INR 384,75,00,875 (Rupees Three Hundred
Eighty Four Crores Seventy Five Lacs and Eight Hundred and Seventy Five). In the total
building cost mentioned above, the Total Civil Cost is INR 94,51,67,472.40 (Rupees
Ninety Four Crore Fifty One Lacs Sixty Seven Thousand Four Hundred and Seventy Two)
which includes fixed interiors e.g. flooring railing, partitions, paints etc. on the first
floor and steel barrel roof structure complete to specifications mentioned in the PE.
Items for Vertical Circulations (lifts and escalators) is INR 16,84,00,000 (Rupees
Sixteen Crores Eighty Four lacs).
The Basement Cost is calculated for an area of 18350 sq. m which is INR 70,34,16,667
(Rupees Seventy Crore Thirty Four Lacs Sixteen Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty Seven
only). The Platform Finishes and Shelter has been calculated to an extent of INR
23,83,79,676 (Rupees Twenty Three Crores Eighty Three Lacs Seventy Nine Thousands
Six Hundred and Seventy Six) as a separate item.
The cost of Site Development which would include site levelling, retaining walls etc. is
INR 29,12,24,803 (Rupees Twenty Nine Crore Twelve Lacs Twenty Four Thousand Eight
Hundred and Three). The contingencies on the costs are kept at 3%. The detailed break-
up along with annexure can be referred from the ‘Preliminary Estimate for Bijwasan
Station report (Revision 12)’.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 159 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
12.2 Station MEP Services Costing
The Internal and external services costs are also added as per norms given in CPWD plinth
area rate Oct. 2012. For Items not covered in these plinth area rates, market rates have
been adopted. These cost estimates are approximates and are based on typical
relationships of quantities such as floor area/volume etc. The cost estimate is based on
built-up area/floor area worked out from the master plans and the plinth area rates
applied to arrive at reasonable costs for taking administrative and financial decisions. The
quantities are multiplied by unit rates to arrive at the estimated cost.
The cost incurred on the Internal Works for the station building which includes station
civil and electrical installations and connections, firefighting and fire alarm services is
coming approximately INR 62,46,47,746 (Rupees Sixty Two Crore Forty Six Lacs Forty
Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Forty Six Rupees)
The Services cost for Site Development which includes External Sewer connection, Filter
Water Supply and its supply network and connections, Storm Water Drainage System,
Horticulture System, Street Lighting and Site Signage is approximately INR 9,96,41,022
(Rupees Nine Crore Ninety Six Lacs Forty One Thousand and Twenty Two).
Water Tanks Cost which includes underground and overhead storage tanks is
approximately INR 1,87,23,931 (One Crore Eighty Seven Lacs and Twenty Three
Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty One Rupees)
Bulk Services Cost which includes Sub-station equipment, DG sets, Ventilation System for
Ground and First Floor, VRV/ VRF AC System, CCTV System, Hydropneumatic Water Supply
System, RO System, Scanning System and Equipment and Communications and SCADA is
approximately INR 27,21,76,144 (Twenty Seven Crore Twenty One Lacs Seventy Six
Thousand One Hundred and Forty Four Rupees)
Therefore, the Total MEP Cost estimated is coming approximately INR 101,51,88,843
(Hundred One Crore Fifty One Lakhs Eighty Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Three
Rupees Only). The contingencies on the costs are kept at 3%.
The detailed break-up along with annexures can be referred from the Preliminary Estimate
for Bijwasan Railway Station, New Delhi, Revision 12.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 160 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
13 RISK ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION
13.1 Introduction
Careful planning, construction and operation schemes are essential to implement safely and with
reliability a project of this magnitude. The Bijwasan railway terminal project has characteristics
that make the project more complex than existing railway projects. It utilizes non-indigenous
technology, and therefore foreign system technology is being selected to provide state of the art
world class facilities, following due process, which put an extra burden on project scheduling and
cost control. Because it is a Greenfield construction, combinations of railway yard alignment as
being planned and executed by Northern Railway ,system technologies for the station building
and allied commercial and operating facilities as well as the coach maintenance, and rake
stabling as well as loco stabling and fuelling facilities have to be taken up concurrently.
This calls for much more complex decision processes involving local governments in addition to
the central government. Furthermore, it involves high uncertainties in terms of political risks, in
addition to financial and technological aspects. This stems from the long project duration that
spans many government departments and the large number of components as well as project size
that encompasses different administrative bodies.
In view of the above factors, the project calls for extensive risk analysis and management for
successful and safe completion that is much more complex than many other railway projects in
India..
13.2 Risk Analysis and Mitigation on this Project.
Risk is made up of two parts: the probability of something going wrong, and the negative
consequences if it does. We have to prepare for and manage risks which can arise during the
project implementation if by a consequence that we hadn't planned for, costs, time, and
reputations could be on the line.
Efforts have been made to identify possible risks during the course of execution of this project
till its completion.
Risk Analysis is complex, and we have drawn on the detailed project report & plans, financial
data, security protocols, marketing forecasts, and other relevant information.
On this project, the following risks have been identified:
i. Construction risks.
ii. Equipment or technology failure, theft, staff sickness, or natural disasters.
iii. Changes in government policy.
iv. Human Risks – Strikes / Bandhs / Accidents or Loss of a key individual.
v. Operational – Disruption to construction supplies and operations, loss of access to essential
assets.
vi. Procedural – Failures of accountability, internal systems, or controls, or from fraud.
vii. Project – Going over the budget, taking too long on key tasks or contractual failures –
Contractor not deploying adequate equipments, manpower & other required resources in
time.
viii. Financial – Business failure, stock market fluctuations, interest rate changes, or non-
availability of funding.
ix. Technical – Advances in technology, or from technical failure.
x. Natural – Weather, natural disasters such as earthquake, floods etc. or disease.
xi. Political – Changes in tax, public opinion, government policy, or foreign influence.
xii. Structural –Inadequacy of design, poor workmanship and quality of work.
xiii. Safety features adopted proving inadequate, leading to site accidents or failure of parts
of structures resulting in manpower or the structure being harmed as well as delaying the
completion of the project.
xiv. Change in the scope of work by the Railways – During the execution of the project there
could be situations where the Railway operational requirements undergo certain revisions
due to the highly dynamic nature of Railway operations. This could necessitate changes
in the planning leading to delays and additional costs.
xv. Having identified the threats as above, we need to assess likelihood of these threats
materializing, and their possible impact. The risks identified above and suggested action
for their mitigation is summarized below.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 161 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
13.3 Proposals for the Mitigation of the Above Risks
i. Construction risks of station building and other related structures integrated with
concourse/airspace above the railway tracks as well as other commercial and residential
buildings which form a part of this project.
The above works which form a part of the Bijwasan project comprises of the design and
construction of all works and services necessary to complete the development / redevelopment
of the Station Buildings, railway yard, coach maintenance workshop & structures and loco shed
etc. as per the Development Agreement documents and the construction specifications.
The railway yard will be constructed by the Northern Railway with their own agency and under
their supervision and will not be the part of this project. However since the platforms and the
overhead structures above the platforms, the subways, escalators & other overhead structures
are to be constructed as a part of this project. These will be adjacent to the railway line; there
is an essential requirement of coordination between the execution of works by the Railway and
by the Concessionaire, since there could be a risk of infringement of the railway tracks. This can
be achieved by deployment of proper equipment and strict supervision. We have to ensure that
such infringements do not take place. No surplus excavated material should be stacked in any
infringing manner and such material should be taken away by the developer or disposed off in
the approved dumping area. Proper and safe scaffolding for construction of FOB’s, subways &
walkways which form part of this project. Safety precautions as required must be strictly
enforced in the installation, testing & commissioning of the lifts & escalators, underground &
above ground ancillary structures / facilities including plant room, water tanks & pumps ,
telecommunication and power cabling etc.
Proper barricading of construction site must be ensured to prevent unauthorised entry into the
protected area of the construction site to prevent unauthorised persons from accidental entry to
save them from falling debris, electric current.
Plumbing & pipelines must be made totally leak proof and electric cables, wires & ancillaries
must be carefully executed and taped to prevent short circuit or electrocution.
Water supply must be made contamination free by proper sealing and other required protection
works.
Suitable provisions in design will have to be made for safety at construction site during design &
erection of temporary woks to enable permanent construction since Delhi lies in a seismically
active zone and also keeping in mind the flooding at site as it is a low lying area (either due to
natural conditions or due to equipment failure such as pumps etc. during construction)
ii. Equipment or technology failure, theft, staff sickness or natural disasters, Weather or
disease.
In a project of this magnitude the quality and progress of work will be adversely affected if
adequate construction equipment is either not provided or is rendered ineffective by improper
maintenance or shortage of operators leading to idling
Further in case due to design defect or specification of selection of technology the work could
suffer. In view of this risk it is essential that selection of technology is done with great care and
implementation is carried out optimally and effectively. It is of great importance that utilities
such as fire fighting, communication & electricity are provided round the clock with proper back
up in case of any related equipment or power failure to avoid any untoward incident.
At large construction sites theft of spares, fuel etc are not uncommon but if they take place the
progress of work slows down besides idling of manpower. In view of this need for tight security
at work site cannot be understated.
The location of this project is in an area which is subject to seasonal sicknesses like skin diseases,
malaria, dengue etc which can affect the availability of manpower. It is therefore suggested that
proper sanitation & drainage at the worksite as well as arrangement of immunization of the
workmen should be arranged in time.
While natural disasters like earthquakes, floods etc cannot be wished away, adequate disaster
management plan must be in place to minimize the effect of such disasters. Also, Delhi being in
high seismic zone, the permanent and temporary structures both must be designed keeping
adequate and relevant provisions for seismic parameters in the design. The construction must
ensure that the safest and best engineering practices are followed while executing the project,
keeping seismic effects/ threats into consideration.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-RP-0002
Rev. 3
2017/02/10 Page 162 of 162
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
iii. Changes in government policy.
While the project is being taken up after due approvals from the different government bodies
like DDA, Delhi Jal Board, ASI, DUAC, AAI, UTTIPEC etc, nothing stops any of these bodies from
changing the policies which may affect the planning for this project. The effect of these changes
can be minimized by remaining in constant touch with these bodies & networking with them
suitably to know in advance of impending changes & planning to handle them.
iv. Human Risks – Strikes / Bandhs / Accidents or Loss of a key individual.
In India, it is not uncommon for strikes & bandhs, rallies & ‘dharnas’ to take place from time to
time in connection with agitations / representations etc, mostly for social and political issues not
related to the project. The effect of such activities results in occasional work stoppages. This is
perhaps inevitable & some provision for the days lost on this account should be planned initially
itself.
v. Operational – Disruption to construction supplies and operations.
Owing to short supply, transportation bottlenecks and interruptions and occasional non
availability of certain materials from time to time there could be delays and disruptions in certain
segments of work. This effect can be minimized by timely and early procurement and storage of
critical materials so that supply is not affected.
vi. Procedural – Failures of accountability, internal systems, or controls, or from fraud.
These are potential risks in all major projects & can be mitigated by having proper planning,
controls & monitoring systems in place during execution of the project.
vii. Project – Going over budget, taking too long on key tasks or contractual failures
The major reasons for delay in most projects is the contractor not deploying adequate
equipments, manpower & other required resources in time. This can be taken care of by providing
planned advances, timely payments for work done & proper monitoring of provision of equipment,
material & manpower by the contractor as required from time to time.
viii. Financial – Business failure, stock market fluctuations, interest rate changes, or non-
availability of funding.
These factors are normally not under the control of the project management team or the
contractor / concessionaire. They have to be factored in while estimating the project cost at the
time of taking up the project.
ix. Technical – Advances in technology, or from technical failure.
Due to this project involving provision of world class state of the art technology & facilities, it
may be necessary to change the proposed technology due to new developments which may come
about during the execution of the project.
x. Political – Changes in tax, public opinion, government policy, or foreign influence.
Since this project will be executed in about 650 days after commencement of work for the project
as per planning as such we must also factor in likely delays of up to 100 days for various reasons.
The possibility of changes in priority and annual allocation of funds not matching the planned and
required amounts, by the government cannot be ruled out. This may lead to further delay.
Changes in corporate tax may also affect the project finances & suitable provisions should be
made in the financial planning of the project.
Since this is a public utility project, at times the public opinion also builds up for provision,
shifting or shutting down of some activities which may result in some changes in the planning
with consequent variation in cost and requiring additional time . Adequate provisions should be
made both in funds and project schedules for meeting such contingencies.
xi. Insurance
Many of the above risks can be taken care by insurance coverage appropriate and adequate to
cover the extent of potential loses it may result from the risks. This should cover third party
risks, fire and theft, breakdown of equipment and group insurance for covering the workmen
against death and injury etc.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0001
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 1 of 5
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
ANNEXURE 1 - PHOTOGRAPHIC REPORT
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0001
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 2 of 5
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
SITE OF THE NEW BIJWASAN RAILWAY STATION
SIGHT OF THE GENERAL SITE.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0001
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 3 of 5
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
DWARKA - SECTOR 21
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0001
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 4 of 5
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
UER II - UNDERPASS
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0001
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 5 of 5
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
ROAD 45.0M R/W. PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0002
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 1 of 6
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
ANNEXURE 2 – EXAMPLES OF WORLD CLASS STATIONS
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0002
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 2 of 6
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
1 DESCRIPTION
In this appendix are provided examples of existing World Class Stations around the world which
can be considered as references for the Development of Bijwasan Station for New Delhi.
2 FRANKFURT (GERMANY)
Frankfurt Main Central Station is one of the busiest railway stations Europe, with about 350,000
passengers per day. It was inaugurated in 1888. It has suffered many ugradings along its history.
The last remarkable one happened in 1978, when the underground station for commuter services
was opened. During Second World World (1939-1945) it was destroyed almost completely, being
entirely rebuilt during the postwar.
Aerial view of the station. The 3 main canopies (plus 2 side ones) can be seen clearly.
Frankfurt Main Central is a terminal station wich has almost 100 tracks, 24 of them with
platforms attached. There are also 4 underground platfiorms for 8 tracks, for metropolitan and
commuter services. . The platforms are covered by three iron-and-glass halls.
View from the platforms of one of the 3 canopies
Daily traffic is considerable:
342 long distance
289 regional
1100 commuter (called S Bahn in Germany)
Frankfurt Station has connection with 3 Tramway lines.
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
5 MADRID ATOCHA (SPAIN)
Atocha station is the most important railway hub in Spain. It was first opened in 1851, and
reinaugurated in 1992 after a complete upgrading.
Atocha consists on 2 adjoing stations:
Madrid-Puerta de Atocha, groundlevel terminal station with 15 tracks with platform,
with a length of 450 metres. It is used exclusively for high-speed services (long
distance and regional HS services, called “AVANT”).
Madrid-Cercanías: underground station with 10 through tracks with platform of length
400 metros. It is used mainly by commuter services. It also has conventional regional
and long distance tracks.
View of the high-speed terminal “Madrid Puerta de Atocha”
The whole railway complex copes with 250.000 passengers per day. It has connection with Metro
Line 1, as well as with many bus lines. It is situated in the heart of Madrid.
Image of the historic building, that originally had 6 tracks with platforms. Due to lack of capacity, the two mentioned stations were built adjoining, and the former station was reconverted in a
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
6 NEW YORK GRAND CENTRAL (UNITED STATES)
Grand Central Terminal was first opened in 1871. In 1931 an extension was inaugurated. After
years of decadence, between 1994 and 2000 a considerable rehabilitation was carried out with
the purpose of recovering the glory days of this mythical railway station.
It has 67 tracks with platforms, distributed in 2 levels:
41 tracks in the upper level
26 track in the lowest one
Both levels are underground.A further station is planned. When it is completed there will be a
total of 75 tracks with platforms.
500.000 persons use the station daily. It has connection with several metro lines.
View of the main hall, where many films have been shot.
View from one of the 44 platforms of the station. Grard Central is considered the station with more platforms in the world. The track area is more functional than aesthetic, unlike the concourse zone.
Growth Rate (2030-2053) 2% 2) Optimistic projections of Corporate
Vision 2025 Indian Railways = 4%
Passengers/each direction *day Year Demand
22,000 2013 44,000
23,795 2015 47,590
28,950 2020 57,901
35,223 2025 70,445
42,854 2030 85,708
47,314 2035 94,628
52,239 2040 1,04,477
57,676 2045 1,15,351
63,679 2050 1,27,357
67,576 2053 1,35,152
On the commissioning of the proposed Bijwasan railway station, Northern Railway plans to
operate 14 pairs of trains originated/terminated at Bijwasan Station (Both Directions). Northern
Railway has advised that in this station, in the washing lines, room will be available for
maintenance of approximately 5 trains in the first phase and another 12 more trains in a second
phase.
After discussions with IRSDC and Northern Railway officers regarding station capacity at
Bijwasan, the estimated passenger demand has been reworked; Their indications are summarised
below:
Trains, which are planned for termination/origination at Bijwasan by N.R after
opening of new station : 14 pairs
Capacity of maintenance of trains, considering berthing platforms, washing lines,RPC-
4 lines and shunting operations required within the station and assuming the yard
facilities as shown in NR yard plan as frozen and final: the 14 pairs will be 44 trains-
22 originating and 22 terminating. These trains will all be 26 coach train trains.
Considering 90% occupancy at termination/origination station, this means 2000
passengers per train, or a total of 88000 passengers per day.
The line capacity, assuming that signaling can be upgraded to ABS in the coming years,
is 70 trains per day with maintenance block of 2 hours. Taking the same %age for
passenger utilization as considered in NR Line capacity chart having projection for
2016-17 to continue, the total number of passenger trains will be 47.Of these, 22 slots
will be originating services, and the residual 25 paths will be through trains, including
EMUs. Considering 1000 passengers per EMU train, this will give a total of 25,000
passengers. With intensive urbanization at the surroundings, this number is expected
to double during the coming years.
The station capacity will be at least 1,38,000 in 2053, a figure higher than the demand previsions.
However, station design shall take into account seasonal peak use to ensure that all station
components conform to a Level of Service (LOS) D during the period.
Additional Increase 20% (ISRDBWCS) Point 2.2.2.
SCENARIO A Year
26,400 2013 52,800
51,425 2030 1,02,849
81,091 2053 1,62,183
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
2013201520202025203020352040204520502053
Demand
Capacity of the Line
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0003
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 5 of 10
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The capacity of the various station areas is a percentage of the maximum practical capacity
depending on the location and usage; according to that fact several studies have been done. The
analysis considers the following aspects.
OVERALL STATION: Design year horizon average peak day (DEMAND USERS CRITERA).
CONCOURSES: Based on analysis of maximum number of trains alighting and detraining at peak
operation (may vary depending on extent of transfer activity) (SUPPLY’TRAINS CRITERIA).
CIRCULATION ELEMENTS: The maximum throughput established for each passenger circulation
element (the emergency egress requirements of the station as determined by the requirements
of NFPA 130 and 101).
PLATFORMS: Platforms – Peak train discharge as determined by analysis (min-center platform
two full capacity trains discharging simultaneously, min-side platform one full capacity train
discharging) (SUPPLY’TRAINS CRITERIA)
Entrance/Egress- Peak hourly load as determined by analysis (minimum of 10% of average peak
daily capacity) (DEMAND USERS CRITERIA)
The rest of Services (Ticketing/Information; Ticket Vending Machines…) have to be designed
basing normally in fixed dimensions).
The following chapters show the corresponding hypothesis and results for 2053 scenario:
4 ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY
4.1 Passenger Classification
IN THE 2053 THE FOLLOWING PASSENGERS DISTRIBUTION IS CONSIDERED
Share: Long Distance EMUs
4,416 2,484
Unreserved 20% 25%
Reserved 60% 70%
1ª Class Lounge 10% 3%
Executive Lounge 10% 3%
TOTAL Waiting Area 100% 100%
4.2 Waiting Areas and Lounge
Sources
INPUTS
Demand daily one way(2053) 69,000 Traffic Station
Demand season daily one way (2053)
82,800 Traffic Station
Demand peak hour one way(2053)
6,900 Calculation (10%)
Demand season peak hour one way (2053)
8,280 Calculation (10%)
Share: Long
Distance
EMUs Average waiting time(minutes)
METHODOLOGY
4,416 2,484 Long Distance EMUs
Hypothesis
Unreserved 20% 25% 30 15
Reserved 60% 70% 15 8
1ª Class Lounge 10% 3% 15 10
Executive Lounge 10% 3% 15 10
TOTAL Waiting Area 100% 100%
Waiting Area LOS square/p
Unreserved C 1,.8 Manual for Standards and Specifications for Railway Stations . Point 4.5.4.6. Waiting Areas an Lounges .2. Capacity : Table 2: Sample Calculation for Concourse Waiting Space
Reserved B 2.25
1ª Class Lounge A 2.61
Executive Lounge A+ 3
OUTPUS Surfaces of Design Peak Hour Season Peak
Hour Definitive Surface (m2)
Unreserved 1,074 1,031 1,074
Reserved 2,012 1,932 2,012
1ª Class Lounge 315 326 326
Executive Lounge 362 378 378
TOTAL Waiting Area 3,764 3,667 3,791
According to the Station design, the available area is 10,418 square meters. Therefore, there
won’t be capacity problems in the future.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0003
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 6 of 10
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
4.3 Circulating Areas
Sources
INPUTS Demand daily one way(2053)
69,000 Traffic Station
Demand season daily one way (2053) 82,800 Traffic Station
Demand peak hour one way(2053) 6,900 Calculation (10%)
Demand season peak hour one way (2053) 8,280 Calculation (10%)
Share: Average waiting time(minutes)
Hypothesis
Long Distance EMUs
4,416 2,484
Unreserved 20% 25% 15 15
Reserved 60% 70% 15 15
1ª Class Lounge 10% 3% 15 15
Executive Lounge 10% 3% 15 15
TOTAL Waiting Area 100% 100%
METHODOLOGY Terminal Area Allocated square meter per person
LOS A B C D E F
Chec-in Queue 1.71 1.53 1.35 1.17 0.99
System breakdown
Wait/Circulate 2.61 2.25 1.8 1.44 0.99
Hold room 1.35 1.17 0.99 0.81 0.54
OUTPUS Surfaces of Design Peak Hour Season Peak Hour Definitive Surface (m2)
Unreserved 677 650 677
Reserved 1975 1896 1975
1ª Class Lounge 227 218 227
Executive Lounge 227 218 227
TOTAL Circulate Area 3,105 2,981 3,105
According to the Station design, the available area is 11,000 square meters. Therefore, there
won’t be capacity problems in the future.
4.4 Ticketing Areas
Sources
INPUTS Demand daily one way(2053) 69,000 Traffic Station
Demand season daily one way (2053) 82,800 Traffic Station
Demand peak hour one way(2053) 6,900 Calculation (10%)
Demand season peak hour one way (2053) 8,280 Calculation (10%)
Share: Average waiting time(minutes)
Hypothesis
Long Distance EMUs
Long Distance EMUs
4,416 2,484
Unreserved 20% 25% 30 15
Reserved 60% 70% 15 8
1ª Class Lounge 10% 3% 15 10
Executive Lounge 10% 3% 15 10
TOTAL Waiting Area 100% 100%
METHODOLOGY Terminal Area Allocated square meter per person
LOS A B C D E F
Chec-in Queue 1.71 1.53 1.35 1.17 0.99 System
breakdown
Wait/Circulate 2.61 2.25 1.8 1.44 0.99
Hold room 1.35 1.17 0.99 0.81 0.54
Long Distance EMUs
Mean arrival (passengers/minute) 15 18 10.35 12.42
Mean service (passengers/minute) 15 18 12 14
Time service /passengers *tincketing (minutes) 2 2 0,5 0,5
Numbers of Ticketing 30 36 6 7
Mean time in queue 3.50 2.92 0.52 0.56 Mean Number of customers in the system 53 53 6 8
OUTPUS Surfaces of Design Peak Hour
Season Peak Hour
Definitive Surface
(m2)
Unreserved 79 87 87 TOTAL
Ticketing Area 79 87 87
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0003
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 7 of 10
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
According to the Station design, the surface provided is 680 square meters. Therefore, there
won’t be capacity problems in the future
4.5 Platforms
The capacity of platforms will assume in all instances the worst case scenario for the alighting
and detraining of trains in the station.
A center platform will assume two 100% capacity trains detraining and evacuating
from the platform at any given time.
A side platform assumes one 100% capacity train detraining and evacuating from the
platform at any given time
Source
INPUTS Number of Platforms 4
Master Plan Options 1,2,3, Type of Platform Side Platform 0
Centre Platform 4
Length platform (m) 620
Type of Train
Capacity/train (passengers ) 1,938 Calculation
Length train 620 Length platform
Length coach 24
Coaches/train 25.83 Calculation
Passengers/coach (100% capacity)
75 Manual for Standards and Specifications for Railway Stations . Point 4.5.4.5. Platform Area. 1 Capacity (Example)
METHODOLOGY
Manual for Standards and Specifications for Railway Stations. Point 4.5.4.5. Platform Area. 1 Capacity
OUTPUTS Demand in the worst case (Passengers) /Centre Platform
3875 Calculation according to Manual
Square meter /person (LOS C) 1.8 Manual for Standards and Specifications for Railway Stations. Table 3 of 4.5.3. Allocated Space per Person in the Terminal Area (Wait/Circulate)
Width of each Platform (m) 11.25 Calculation
According to the Station design, the width of the platforms is 12/15 m. Therefore, there won’t
be capacity problems in the future.
4.6 Summary
Square meters
Peak Hour Season Peak Hour Definitive Surface (m2)
TOTAL Waiting Area 3,764 3,667 3,764
TOTAL Circulate Area 3,105 2,981 3,105
TOTAL Ticketing Area 79 87 87
4.7 Vertical Circulation Elements (VCE)
Sources
INPUTS Demand daily one way (2053) 69,000 Traffic Station
Demand sesson daily one way (2053) 82,800 Traffic Station
Demand peak hour one way (2053) 6,900 Calculation (10%)
Demand season peak hou one way (2053) 8,280 Calculation (10%)
Demand peak hour one way (2053)
Basement to Ground floor/Platforms 100% 6,900
Groundfloor/Platforms to basement 3,875
Demand seasonal peak hour one way (2053)
Basement to Ground floor/Platforms 100% 8,280
Groundfloor/Platforms to basement 4,650
Demand peak hour one way (2053)
Groundfloor to 1st floor 100% 6,900
1st floor to groundfloor 100% 6,900
Demand seasonal peak hour one way (2053)
Groundfloor to 1st floor 100% 8,280
1st floor to groundfloor 100% 8,280
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
TOTAL Waiting Area TOTAL Circulate Area TOTAL Ticketing Area
Square meters
Square meters
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0003
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 8 of 10
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
VERTICAL CIRCULAR ELEMENTS
NUMBER (1 sens) CAPACITY
ELEVATORS ESCALATORS STAIRS
ELEVATORS ESCALATORS STAIRS
TOTAL (without Elevators)
NO WIDTH Daily Season Daily Season
Basement to Ground floor/Platforms 14 24 12 2 504 1,008
475.2 619.2 1,483.2 1,627.2
Groundfloor/Platforms to basement 14 24 12 2 504 1,008
475.2 619.2 1,483.2 1,627.2
Groundfloor to 1st floor 12 16 9 3 432 672
534.6 696.6 1,206.6 1,368.6
1st floor to groundfloor 12 16 9 3 432 672
534.6 696.6 1,206.6 1,368.6
METHODOLOGY LOS
Flow per unit width Flow per unit width
Manual for Standards and Specifications for Railway Stations. Point 4.5.4.5.
Platform Area. 1 Capacity (Example)
(p/m/m) (p/m/m)
A <16 16
B 16-23 23
C 23-33 33
D 33-43 43
E 43-56 56
F Variable Variable
Affectation passengers by ratio luggage (surface free four passengers) 60% Hyphotesis
Maxim Service Time (minutes) 4 Manual (4.5.4.4.)
Escalator capacity (p/min) 70 Manual (4.5.4.4.)
Elevator Capacity (p/min) 60 OTIS
In the case Platform to Basement we have considered that all the vertical circulation elements will work in the same sens in order to evacuate people
Hyphotesis
OUTPUS Service Level Peak Hour
Season Peak Hour
Definitive Surface (m2)
Basement to Ground floor/Platforms (F/C) 0.08 0.08 0.08
Groundfloor/Platforms to basement (minutes) 2.61 2.86 2.86
Groundfloor to 1st floor (F/C) 0.08 0.08 0.08
1st floor to groundfloor (F/C) 0.10 0.10 0.10
In the analysis of capacity of the Vertical Circulation elements the following considerations have
been taken into account:
All the flows between floors have been considered, apart from the flows from/to the
parking
In all the cases, the flow has been estimated as a percentage of the flow number of
passengers at the peak hour (one direction), apart from the flow Platforms to Ground
floor. In this case the flow is the maximum capacity of two trains arriving to the station
at the same time when all the passengers leave them.
The capacity of the system has been estimated as the addition of the capacities of
escalators and stairs. The capacity of the elevators hasn’t been considered.
In the case of the flow between Platforms and Basement, the totalcapacity has been
estimated as the total of the capacity in two directions. In the rest of the cases, the
capacity considered has been just the capacity in one direction.
As a result of the analysis and according to the Station design we can conclude:
In all the cases the flow is lower than the capacity (F/C <0.1)
In the case of the Platform-Basement Floor the operation time (2.86 minutes) is lower
than the targeted time (4 minutes) according to the Manual.
Therefore, there won’t be capacity problems in the future.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0003
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 9 of 10
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
5 PARKING REQUIREMENTS (2053)
5.1 Passenger Classifications
INPUTS
Demand daily one day (2053) 69,000
Workers 600
Demand daily one way including workers (2053) 69,600
Demand season daily one way (2053) 81,091
Share Hourly Arrivals (%) Stay Time (Hours)
0:01 0,0% 0
1:02 0,0% 0
2:03 0,0% 0
3:04 0,0% 0
4:05 0,0% 0
5:06 0,0% 9
6:07 2,0% 9
7:08 5,0% 9
8:09 5,0% 9
9:10 5,0% 9
10:11 2,0% 9
11:12 2,0% 5
12:13 2,0% 5
13:14 2,0% 4
14:15 2,0% 4
15:16 2,0% 3
16:17 2,0% 3
17:18 4,0% 2.5
18:19 10,0% 2.5
19:20 10,0% 0.5
20:21 15,0% 0.5
21:22 15,0% 0.5
22:23 10,0% 0.5
23:24 5,0% 0
TOTAL 100%
Average Stay time 2.79
Modal Share
Train-Walk 5%
Train-Bus 30%
Train-Metro 30%
Train-Airport 0%
Train-Car 15%
Train-Cycle 2%
Train-Tw 18%
TOTAL 100%
5.2 Passengers Requirements of Capacity
The capacities shall be designed for the peak hours of the day of the maximum seasonal peak of
the design year. The provision of parking bays shall depend on average parking demand and
turnover time and level of
LOS C shall be considered for future requirements. Parking accumulation survey, parking duration
survey and classified traffic volume surveys at entry/exists shall be done on peak days of the
week for duration of 24 hours to determine parking demand in the present condition, modal
distribution of this demand in vehicle categories such as private cars, two wheelers, buses and
other category of vehicles.
Proposed parking shall have minimum provision of parking bays as per the baseline studies and
maintaining Level of Service C. However, the provision of parking for peak demand shall be as
follows, based on established peak parking demand.
PARKING CARS Hour Arrivals
(cars )
Arrivals
(Accumul)
Exits
(Hour)
Exits
(Cars)
Exists
(Accumul) Stay Cars
0 0 0 0 0 0 282
1 0 0 1 0 0 282
2 0 0 2 0 0 282
3 0 0 3 0 0 282
4 0 0 4 0 0 282
5 0 0 14 0 0 282
6 40 40 15 0 0 322
7 99 139 16 0 0 421
8 99 238 17 0 0 520
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0003
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 10 of 10
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
PARKING CARS Hour Arrivals
(cars )
Arrivals
(Accumul)
Exits
(Hour)
Exits
(Cars)
Exists
(Accumul) Stay Cars
9 99 337 18 0 0 619
NUMBERS OF BAYS
778
10 40 377 19 0 0 659
11 30 407 16 0 0 689
12 30 436 17 0 0 718
13 30 466 17 0 0 748
14 30 496 18 0 0 778
15 20 516 18 40 40 758
16 20 536 19 129 169 649
17 0 536 20 159 327 490
18 0 536 21 149 476 341
19 0 536 20 60 536 282
20 0 536 21 0 536 282
21 0 536 22 0 536 282
22 0 536 23 0 536 282
23 0 536 23 0 536 282
TOTAL 536 536
PARKING TW Hour Arrivals
(tw)
Arrivals
(Accumul)
Exists
(Hour)
Exits
(Tw)
Exists
(Accumul) Stay Tw
0 0 0 0 0 0 282
1 0 0 1 0 0 282
2 0 0 2 0 0 282
3 0 0 3 0 0 282
4 0 0 4 0 0 282
5 0 0 14 0 0 282
6 40 40 15 0 0 322
7 99 139 16 0 0 421
8 99 238 17 0 0 520
9 99 337 18 0 0 619
NUMBERS OF BAYS
778
10 40 377 19 0 0 659
11 30 407 16 0 0 689
12 30 436 17 0 0 718
13 30 466 17 0 0 748
14 30 496 18 0 0 778
15 20 516 18 40 40 758
16 20 536 19 129 169 649
17 40 575 20 159 327 530
18 0 575 21 149 476 381
19 0 575 20 60 536 322
20 0 575 21 40 575 282
21 0 575 22 0 575 282
22 0 575 23 0 575 282
23 0 575 23 0 575 282
TOTAL 575 575
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0004
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 1 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
ANNEXURE 4 - EVACUATION IN CASE OF FIRE. CRITERIA AND CALCULATION
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0004
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 2 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
1 ANALYSIS CRITERIA
The applied regulation for the calculation of evacuation times and for the station design, in
terms of means of egress, is NFPA 130 and its references to NFPA 101. In accordance with this
regulation, the main criteria taken into account are described below:
Regarding to time and travel distance restrictions for evacuation:
4 minutes or less for platform evacuation.
6 minutes or less to reach a point of safety.
100m is the maximum travel distance on the platform to a point at which a
means of egress route leaves the platform.
In relation with the number of passengers to evacuate, the most critical situation has
been considered:
Train load: that of two trains, fully charged (1950 passengers each), arriving
simultaneously to the platform they serve. Since the new platforms are
expected to be 600 m long, the trains arriving to the station are supposed to
be 620 m long.
Entraininig load awaiting a train: people waiting on the platform on the peak
15-minute period for the estimated scenario in 2053 (4140 passengers in each
direction).
One escalator in the whole station must be considered as being out of
service.
In connection with travel speeds, the adopted values for the different means of
egress are:
Corridors and ramps of 4% slope or less: 38 m/min.
Stairs, stopped escalators and ramps over 4% slope:
o Up direction: 15.24 m/min
o Down direction: 18.3 m/min.
To measure the number and width of these means of egress, the following capacities
have been considered:
Corridors and ramps of 4% slope or less: 89.4 pass/m.min.
Stairs, stopped escalators and ramps over 4% slope:
o Up direction: 62.6 pass/m.min.
o Down direction: 71.6 pass/m.min.
In an emergency situation, all the stairs and escalators serving the platform are
susceptible to be considered as means of egress, including sevice VCEs and VCEs
coming from waiting areas to enter the platform, and normally used for departures.
In addition to the NFPA criteria, the Manual for Standards and Specifications for Raiway
Stations offers some indications about the preferred minimum clear distance at platform level.
According to these advices:
Width of all means of egress and their surrounding structure (platform obstacles) on
the platform have been projected so that the minimum clear distance from the edge
of the platform to these obstacles shall be 2,640m.
A minimum of two side-by-side VCEs (two escalators or a stair and a escalator) shall
be provided as the minimum vertical circulation unit on each platform.
The following chart shows, step by step, how the full train load capacity (1950 passengers) has
been calculated. The data base is the length of the platform /length of the train: 620m, and
the length of each coach (24 m).
Length of
train / Length
of platform
Length
of a
coach
Number of coaches/
train
Passengers/coach
(100% capacity)
Capacity of a train
(100% capacity)
620 m. 24 m. 620 / 24 = 25.83
coaches ≈ 26 coaches. 75 pass./coach
75 pass./coach x 26
coaches = 1950 pass. /
train
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0004
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 3 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
2 CALCULATION
Considering all the previous criteria, and beeing the length and width of each platform has
been established, the number and width of stairs and escalators on each platform was
established as it is shown on the plans, and calculated as it is demonstrated on the following
charts. First, the calculation will be applied to the narrowest platform, the one located on the
south of the station with 12 m width.
Regarding the worse scenario:
PLATFORM PF7-PF8 (12 m)
NUMBER OF ESCALATORS per
platform ESCALATORS’ TOTAL WIDTH EVACUATION CAPACITY OF ESCALATORS TOTAl EVACUATION CAPACITY
UP 1 1 x 1m= 1m 55.5 pass./m.min. 55.5 pass./min
DOWN 4 4 x 1m= 4m 71.6 pass./m.min. 286.4 pass./min
OUT OF SERVICE 1 -- --
ESCALATORS EVACUATION CAPACITY IN 1 MIN. 342 pass. / min
ESCALATORS EVACUATION CAPACITY IN 4 MIN. 1368 pass.
Considering that 5970 passengers have to be evacuated in less than 4 minutes, the evacuation speed shall be at least 1492.5 pass/min (5970 pass./4min).
Known that the evacuation speed of the stairs is the same that for escalators, we can obtain the minimum width of stairs needed to evacuate the platform in 4 minutes or less.
CALCULATION OF STAIRS’ WIDTH
EVACUATION CAPACITY TO REACH 1493 pass./min
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF ESCALATORS 342 pass./min
NUMBER OF
STAIRS
TOTAL WIDTH OF
STAIRS (*)
EVACUATION CAPACITY
OF STAIRS per min.
EVACUATION CAPACITY NEEDED IN STAIRS 1151 pass./min.
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF THE 2 STAIRS TO THE WAITING AREA (UP) 55.5 pass./m.min 2 3.6 m 200
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF THE 2 STAIRS UNDER WAITING AREA 71.6 pass./m.min 2 3.6 m 258
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF THE 4 STAIRS TO UNDERGROUND CORRIDORS 71.6 pass./m.min 4 9.7 m 693
(*) The width of the stairs may be different to achieve the total width, but no stair may have less than 1,12m.
Having 5 escalators in operation and a total width of stairs of 16,9 m distributed along the platform, all passengers can be evacuated in less than 4 minutes.
This without considering that, according to NFPA 130 (2010), elevators are permitted to account for part of the means of egress capacity in stations; only using 5 of the escalators and the stairs, having these a
minimum of 16,9 m total width.
Two trains
load Entraining load awaiting on the platform (peak 15-min)
Total
passenger
load
3900 pass. 4140 pass./ h x 2 directions / 60 min/h x 15 min = 2070 pass. 5970 pass.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0004
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 4 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The same process can be applied to the rest of the platforms.
PLATFORMS PF1-PF2, PF3-PF4 and PF5-PF6 (15 m)
NUMBER OF ESCALATORS per
platform
ESCALATORS’ TOTAL WIDTH EVACUATION CAPACITY OF ESCALATORS TOTAl EVACUATION CAPACITY
UP 1 1 x 1m= 1m 55.5 pass./m.min. 55.5 pass./min
DOWN 8 8 x 1m= 8m 71.6 pass./m.min. 572.8 pass./min
OUT OF SERVICE 1 -- --
ESCALATORS EVACUATION CAPACITY IN 1 MIN. 628 pass. / min
ESCALATORS EVACUATION CAPACITY IN 4 MIN. 2515 pass.
CALCULATION OF STAIRS’ WIDTH
EVACUATION CAPACITY TO REACH 1493 pass./min
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF ESCALATORS 628 pass./min
NUMBER OF STAIRS TOTAL WIDTH OF STAIRS (*)
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF
STAIRS per min.
EVACUATION CAPACITY NEEDED IN STAIRS 865 pass./min.
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF THE 2 STAIRS TO THE WAITING AREA (UP) 55.5 pass./min 2 7.2 m 400
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF THE 2 STAIRS UNDER WAITING AREA 71.6 pass./min 2 3.6 m 258
EVACUATION CAPACITY OF THE 4 STAIRS TO UNDERGROUND CORRIDORS 71.6 pass./min 4 2.9 m 207
Having a 5 escalators in operation and a total width of stairs of 13,7 m distributed along the platform,
all passengers could be evacuated in less than 4 minutes. Anyway, the station design proposes a with
of no less than 1.80 m for all stairs along the platform.
The second criteria to be fulfilled is to reach a point of safety in 6 minutes or less.
Since, in options 1 and 3, the travelling distances along the basement level are too long to get otside
the station in less than 6 minutes, the solution is to provide a point of safety on the basement level
itself, by installating automatic doors at both ends of the underground corridors (perpendicularly to
the tracks). The characteristics and fire resistance of these automatic doors should be those which
guarantee at least that:
the remaining path till the closest exit can be considered a point of safety (in terms of
temperature and air quality)
the fire resistance of these doors provides, minimum, the time needed to reach this closest
exit.
Given that the travel speed through a corridor is 38 m/min., and knowing that the distance from the
furthest VCE to these automatic doors is 63.125m, the time to get these doors, and so, to reach a
point of safety is:
Horizontal travel speed Max. distance from VCE to point of safety Time to go through the corridor TOTAL time to reach a point of safety (6 min MAX.)
38 m/min. 63.125m 63.125m / 38 m/min = 1.66 min. 4 min (max.platform evac.time) + 1.66min = 5.66 min
Both time restrictions are accomplished in all platforms.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0005
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 1 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
ANNEXURE 5 – BOUNDARY CONSTRAINTS
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0005
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 2 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
1 BOUNDARY CONSTRAINTS
This document contains the regulation and constraints for the development of ground transport
infrastructures and constructions that somehow influence the design of the station and ofthe
entire Master Plan.
As stated before, the available railway land for the construction of the new World class station
at Bijwasan is 145.88 ha. Land measuring 110.07 ha has been earmarked by DDA (Delhi
Development Authority) for Northern Railways; 12.91 ha are under litigation between DDA and
current occupants (village, farmhouses, school, cremation yard, grace yard and approximately
22.90 ha of land abutting this plot under existing main line will also be available for
development. However, according to the land survey demarcation 109.57 ha of plot is only
established at ground for development as Taj Vivanta Hotel and DMRC depot may have
occupied some part of the plot.
AREA STATEMENT
A Sq.m Hect.
Area under road /main line 229000 22.9
B Land acquired from dda by nr 1095795 109.58
C
Land under litigation
Govt .girls sr sec school 24267 2.43
Grave yard 4806 0.48
Cremation ground-1 5299 0.53
Anup narang farm 17014 1.7
Chawla&jain narang farm 21218 2.12
Govt. Boys sr. Sec school 21510 2.15
Pond 8901 0.89
Mohmad shahbadpur village 25605 2.56
Cremation ground-2 505 0.05
Total land to be acquired 129125 12.91
TOTAL LAND (A+B+C) =145.88 Ha ******
However, there are some areas that, although being out of the property, must also be
developed to ensure the correct development of the master plan. These areas are necessary to
design the accesses to the site, such as the roundabout connection with the UER II. Those areas
are marked in blue in the picture below.
For the development of Bijwasan World Class station there are some constraints which need to
be considered from the initial design stages.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0005
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 3 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
1.1 Airport Land and Air Funnel
Due to its location, the PROJECT must be coherent with the constraints imposed by the nearby
airport, Indira Gandhi International Airport, considering not only the current configuration of
the airport but also its development in the short, medium, long and ultimate terms.
The main constraints imposed by the airport that might affect the PROJECT are:
Height limitations
Radio-electrical limitations
Noise impact
Safety concerns
The details of these are developed in a specific Annexure called Airport Constraints.
1.2 Existing Mainline Alignment
The existing railway line Delhi –Jaipur has double track. Currently there is no overhead contact
line, but it will be implemented in the future. Bijwasan station has been designed considering
this.
The total area under ROW/Mainline is 22.90 Ha.
Two existing stations will be affected by the construction of New Bijwasan World Class Station:
the current Bijwasan station and Shahabad Mohammadpur station. They will be demolished
after the new Bijwasan station is built.
1.3 Railway Land boundary towards Airport and existing road situated between
boundary and railway line
Railway Land boundary is just close to the existing Main Line. The existing road situated
between Airport boundary and railway Line links the UER II with Shahabad Mohammadpur
village.
Any development in this Area needs to be approved by DDA and the Airport Authority.
1.4 UER-II highway
The site is transversally crossed by the Urban Extension Road II (UER II), which is a 100 m ROW
road in Dwarka sector. The UER II road was built to improve connectivity between Dwarka and
the rest of Delhi and also to take the load off Delhi’s arterial roads. It is a very prominent road
and connects Dwarka to NH-8 and NH-10. The UER II road is also the primary access road to the
Dwarka Sector 21 Metro Station and the Indira Gandhi International Airport.
This road crosses under the existing Delhi-Rewari railway line through a Road Underpass Bridge
(RUB). The need to respect the vertical clearance of this road jeopardizes considerably the
design of the track layout in the future Bijwasan station.
1.5 Drain from airport
There is a drain which runs parallel to UER-II. Its functionality needs to be respected.
1.6 Underground Metro Lines and their proposed extensions
Exiting Dwarka-21 Metro terminal is adjacent to the Site. Metro Line 3 and the Airport Metro
Link end in this station. A future extension to Gurgaon at IFFCO Chowk is in study. DMRC has
prepared a DPR and submitted it to Haryana Govt. No decision regarding construction of this
line or its scheduling / funding has yet been taken.
The Blue Line of the Delhi Metro connects Dwarka to Noida/Anand Vihar, passing through the
Central Business District (CBD) of Delhi, i.e. Connaught Place, and as well some residential and
commercial hubs in that route.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0005
Rev. 1
2016/07/15 Page 4 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
The Delhi Airport Metro Express (DAMEL) runs from Dwarka Sector 21 Metro station to the New
Delhi Railway station, linking it with the Indira Gandhi International airport. A part of this line
is underground. This metro line is also known as the Orange line of the Delhi Metro.
Since, the Blue line and the Orange line meet at the Dwarka Sector 21 Metro terminal, this
metro station is already an Interchange station for commuters changing routes between the
Orange line and the Blue line.
1.7 Villages and farms yet to be shifted
There are several farms and villages in Dwarka Sector-21, which cover a total area of
12.91ha.The land acquisition of these plots is under litigation between DDA and their
occupants.
1.8 Drain across the plot
A natural drain across the plot needs to be respected.
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0006
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 1 of 3
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
ANNEXURE 6 – SUSTAINABILITY
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0006
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 2 of 3
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
1 INDIAN GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL (IGBC). DESCRIPTION
In terms of sustainability, the criteria applied on the project is that of the Indian Green Building
Council (IGBC). According to IGBC, “A green building is one which uses less water, optimizes
energy efficiency, conserves natural resources, generates less waste and provides healthier
spaces for occupants, as compared to a conventional building”. This will be the key principle on
the whole proposal.
2 LEED CHECK LIST. INDIA CERTIFICATION LEVELS.
The parameters IGBC measures are based on LEED check list, adapted to India circumstances and
context. The final aim of this check list is to be awarded with the LEED Certificate.
The factors (Credits) LEED measures in India can be grouped into 6 chapters. Besides these
Credits, some Prerequisites on each chapter are required to get the LEED Certificate.
During the check process, each Credit is assigned a score (points), so that the highest the final
score is, the most prestigious the LEED Certification is awarded.
The following charts resume the Credits and Prerequisites which are measured according to LEED
check list. The third column gathers the maximum score for each credit.
I. SUSTAINABLE SITES (13 possible points)
Prerequisite: Erosion & Sedimentation Control Required
Credit 1 Site Selection 1 point
Credit 2 Development Density & Community Connectivity 1 point
Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 point
Credit 4.1 Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access 1 point
Credit 4.2 Alternatie Transportation, Alternative Fuel Refueling Stations 1 point
Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity 1 point
Credit 5.1 Reduced Site Disturbance, Protect or Restore Open Space 1 point
Credit 5.2 Reduced Site Disturbance, Development Footprint 1 point
Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design, Quantity Control 1 point
Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design, Quality Control 1 point
Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect Non Roof 1 point
Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect Roof 1 point
Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1 point
II. WATER EFFICIENCY (6 possible points)
Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping: reduce by 50% 1 point
Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping. No Potable Use or No Irrigation. 1 point
Credit 2.1 Water Efficiency in Air-conditioning System: reduce by 50% 1 point
Credit 3 Innovative Wastewater Technologies. 1 point
Credit 4.1 Water Use Rrduction: 20% reduction. 1 point
Credit 4.2 Water Use Reduction: 30% reduction. 1 point
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0006
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 3 of 3
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
III. ENERGY & ATMOSPHERE (17 possible points)
Prerequisite 1: Fundamental Building Systems Commissioning Required
Prerequisite 2: Minimum Energy Performance Required
Prerequisite 3: CFC Reduction in HVAC & R Equipment Required
Credit 1.1 Optimize Energy Performance: 20% New / 10% Existing 2 points
Credit 1.2 Optimize Energy Performance: 30% New / 20% Existing 2 points
Credit 1.3 Optimize Energy Performance: 40% New / 30% Existing 2 points
Credit 1.4 Optimize Energy Performance: 50% New / 40% Existing 2 points
Credit 1.5 Optimize Energy Performance: 60% New / 50% Existing 2 points
Credit 2.1 Renewable Energy: 2.5% 1 point
Credit 2.2 Renewable Energy: 5% 1 point
Credit 2.3 Renewable Energy: 7.5% 1 point
Credit 3 Additional Commissioning 1 point
Credit 4 Ozone Depletion 1 point
Credit 5 Measurement & Verification 1 point
Credit 6 Green Power: 50% 1 point
IV. MATERIALS & RESOURCES (13 possible points)
Prerequisite 1: Storage & Collection of Recyclables Required
Credit 1 Building Reuse 3 points
Credit 2 Construction Waste Management 2 points
Credit 3 Resource Reuse 2 points
Credit 4 Recycled Content 2 points
Credit 5 Local/Regional Materials 2 points
Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 1 point
Credit 7 Certified Wood 1 point
V. INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (15 possible points)
Prerequisite 1: Minimum Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Performance Required
Prerequisite 2: Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Required
Credit 1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 1 point
Credit 2 Increased Ventilation 1 point
Credit 3 Construction IAQ Management Plans 2 points
Credit 4 Low-emiting Materials 4 points
Credit 5 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control 1 point
Credit 6 Controlability of Systems 2 points
Credit 7 Thermal Comfort 2 points
Credit 8 Daylight & Views 2 points
VI. INNOVATION & DESIGN PROCESS (5 possible points)
Credit 1 Innovation in Design 4 points
Credit 2 LEED® Accrediteed Proffesional 1 point
3 THE RESULT: LEED CERTIFICATION
Once the check list above is measured, the LEED certification is awarded. Depending on the
obtained score, the Centification is classified into levels, as follows:
Rating Points
LEED- Certified 26-32
LEED- Silver 33-38
LEED- Gold 39-51
LEED- Platinum 52-69
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0007
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 1 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
ANNEXURE 7 – AIRPORT CONSTRAINTS
SENER Doc. P210G04-01-KD4-SR-AN-0007
Rev. 0
2013/09/13 Page 2 of 4
KD4- Final Concept, Master Plan and Feasibility Report (Complete)
SENER Ingeniería y Sistemas S.A. - India 2014
1 CONTENT
This document contains the regulation and constraints for the development of ground transport
infrastructures and constructions in the vicinity of Delhi Indira Gandhi International Airport.
Bijwasan New Delhi Railway Station, considered as a development of ground transport
infrastructures, including constructions, is planned at the west side of Delhi Indira Gandhi
International Airport, just in front of threshold 11. It is thereafter referred to as "the PROJECT".
Due to its location, the PROJECT must be coherent with the constraints imposed by the nearby
airport, considering not only the current configuration of the airport but also its development in
the short, medium, long and ultimate terms.
The main constraints imposed by the airport that might affect the PROJECT are:
Height limitations
Radio-electrical limitations
Noise impact
2 HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
Aiming at maintaining the airspace around aerodromes free from obstacles so as to permit the
intended airplane operations at the aerodromes to be conducted safely and to prevent the
aerodromes from becoming unusable by the growth of obstacles around the aerodromes,
international and national civil aviation regulations (which are usually coincident) require that
the height of any artificial obstacles (such as buildings, trees, electrical lines, traffic panels,
vehicles, ...) must not exceed some imaginary tridimensional surfaces, called "obstacle
limitation surfaces", which are defined with respect to the runways of the airport and extend
beyond the limits of the airport.
The characteristics of the obstacle limitation surfaces for each airport are usually defined by the
national civil aviation authority, which also controls that no infringements of these surfaces are
produced at any time. Note that the obstacle limitation surfaces are defined for both the
current layout of the airport and the future layout as defined by the planned development of the
airport. National regulations (either/both aviation or land-planning) usually establish the height
limitations, the procedure to apply for authorization of new obstacles in the vicinity of the
airports, and the procedure in case of failing to observe the regulations.
The obstacle limitation surfaces that have been officially established for Delhi airport have not
been available. As preliminary information, it can be considered that the more stringent height
limitation at the area of the PROJECT will be that one imposed by the "approach surface" of
runway 11, the "take-off climb surface" of runway 29, the "transitional surface" of runway 11-29
and the "inner horizontal surface" of the airport, as defined in the India's CIVIL AVIATION
REQUIREMENTS SECTION 4, AERODROME STANDARDS & AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES, SERIES B,
AERODROME FACILITIES, PART I, AERODROME DESIGN AND OPERATIONS, chapter 4
(http://www.dgca.nic.in/cars/B4B-B1.pdf) and based on the information taken from Delhi