Top Banner
Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton, Marshall Moore, Matthew Lehmitz, Tal Wammen, Colin Lucas October 27, 2011 1
43

Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

1

Preliminary Design Review

Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton, Marshall Moore, Matthew Lehmitz, Tal Wammen, Colin Lucas

October 27, 2011

Page 2: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

210/27/2011

Mission Overview

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 3: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

3

Scientific Mission Overview

o Characterize the performance of electrically active heat shielding

oProposed method of reentry: o Electromagnetic Heat Shield

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 4: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

4

Engineering Mission Overview

o Develop a standardized probe and deployment system.

o Develop a reliable and reusable standard electronic system.

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 5: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

5

Theory and Concepts

o To design and build a standardized probe deployment system to test an advanced, electrically shielded reentry system.

o These concepts, as well as a standardized delivery mechanism, will provide a foundation to build future experiments.

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 6: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

6

Theory and Concepts

o Research based from several papers regarding preventing radio black out.

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

o A strong magnet should repel charged particles.

o Particles striking the payload impart energy on the probe causing heat.

Page 7: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

7

Concept of Operations

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

t ≈ 0 minLaunch

End of Terrier Malamute Burn

t ≈ 1.7 minShedding of Skin t ≈ 2.8 min

Apogee

t ≈ 4.0 minProbe Deployment

t ≈ 8.2 minChute Deploys t ≈ 15 min

Splash Down

Page 8: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

8

Success Criteria

o Reduce heat on reentry of a probe.

o Confirm results with control.

o Create a standardized probe deployment platform enabling future progression in the field.

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 9: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

910/27/2011

System Overview

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 10: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

10

Subsystem Definitions

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

System Abbreviation Description

AHHS

Electromagnet EM Generates a strong magnet force to reduce heat during reentry

Power POW Supplies power to the electromagnet and various sub systems.

Sensors SENS Provides data for temperature and other environment variables.

Wireless WR Provides wireless uplink to the rocket for safe data storage.Control CTRL Controls all major functions of the probe.

Recovery REC Slows descent so that radio uplink can be maintained.

Airframe AF Provides safe heat resistant housing for all components

Payload

Wallops Power WP Power provided by wallops during flight will control our systems.

Wallops Telemetry WT Telemetry provided by wallops during flight will allow us to transmit sensor data.

Sensors SENS Provide data for temperature as well as other environmental variables.

Wireless WR Provides the capability for the probe to transmit data for later recovery.

Payload Electrical System PES Provides necessary control, refines wallops interfaces, back up wallops interfaces.

Onboard Power POW Provides additional power as well as backup power after reentry.

Ejection System ES Provides the capability to retain probe safely as well as eject it freely.Wallops Deck WD Provides firm mounting of components.

Page 11: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

11

Subsystem Overview

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Air F

r am

e

Mag

net

Pow

er

Reco

very

Cont

rol

Sens

ors

Wire

l ess

CTRL/POW

WR/CTRL

CTRL/REC

SENS/CTRLMN/POW

Page 12: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

12

Subsystem Overview

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Nasa Deck

Ejection System

Wallops Power Wallops Telem

Onboard Power

PES

Wireless

WR/PESSENS/PES

POW/PES

WT/PES

ES/PES

WP/PES

Sensors

Page 13: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

13

Critical Interfaces

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Abbreviation Breif description Possible solution

AHHS

MN/POW

The magnet will have to have a direct high capacity route to the battery if an electromagnet is used. High current wires at the same guage of the battery will need to be used.

CTRL/POW

The control sytem will need to not only supply but also control the power system to boot the probe up and shut it down. Power mosfets may be able to couple these systems together safely.

SENS/CTRLThe control system will need to be able to read data from the sensors. This can be accomplished with either an ADC system or digital bus.

WR/CTRL

The wireless system will need to carry data from the ctrl system to the rocket base station. This will be done typically via a UART port.

CTRL/RECThe control system will need to be activated at the proper time.

Power mosfets or relays could activate the control surfaces to release the power chute.

*/AHHSAll sub systems within the probe will need to be mounted securely and safely.

The probe body will need mounting holes at various places to keep electronics mounted firmly.

AHHS/Payload

The AHHS prove will need to be mounted to the payload firmly during ascent and allow the probe to be ejected safely and reliably.

Several options are being reviewed. One possible solution is a nylon cover over the probes that is released by burning attachments with nicrome wire.

Payload

WP/PES

Power provided through wallops will need to be routed to the PES system for safe distribution. Poly fuses and mosfets will be used to manage the power supply from wallops.

SENS/PESThe PES system will need to get data from the sensor subsystem. This can be accomplished with either an ADC system or digital bus.

ES/PES

The ejection system will need to get control signals from the PES at the right time to release the probe.

This can be accomplshed with power mostfets or relays to activate the release mechanism.

WR/PES

The wireless system will need to receive signals from the probes and relay the data back to wallops. This will be done typically via a UART port.

POW/PES

The backup power system will need to be connected to the PES to supply power in the event of a power failure. This will be done with standard battery connectors.

WT/PES

The wallops telemetry system will need to communicate with the PES to transmit data from the probes and onboard sensors. This will be accomplished via the telemetry connector.

*/PayloadAll systems will need to be firmly mounted to the payload during ascent. This will be accomplished in variouse ways depending on the sub system.

Page 14: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

14

System/Project LevelRequirement Verification Plan

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Requirement Verification Method

Description

Produce a 1 Tesla Magnetic Field

Simulationand

Testing

Use an iron core with copper windings to produce an electromagnet. A Gauss meter to measure the magnetic field.

The payload structure will survive 50G forces with minimal deflections during launch.

Analysis SolidWorks will be used to subject our payload structure to a 50G uniform acceleration to measure deflections.

Probe Should Eject From the Payload Safely and Cleanly

Demonstration Probe will be against a spring, secured with a Wallops ribbon which is melted, releasing the probe.

Page 15: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

15

User Guide Compliance

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Type Quantitative Constraint

Physical Envelope CylindricalDiameter: 12 inchesHeight: 6 inches

Weight 15 lbf ± 0.5 lbf

Center of Gravity (COG) ±0.5in from axial center of RockSat-X plate

Power and Telemetry 10x 0-5V 16-bit A/D Lines1 parallel lineOne asynchronous lineOne redundant power line (28V)3 non-redundant power lines1 GSE power line (28V)1 Ah capacity

High Voltage No high voltage lines required.

Page 16: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

16

Sharing Logistics

o Who are we sharing with?o University of Northern Colorado

o The possibility of a communication system between the AstroX payload and the UNC payload is being considered.

o Plan for collaboration?o Email, phone, road-trips to Greeley and Boulder

o Communication with UNC on a weekly basis.

o Grant UNC access to the AstroX private website.

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 17: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

1710/27/2011

Subsystem Overview

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 18: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

18

Subsystem: Magnet source

o 100 seconds of activation

o Must Sit for 5 Days

o Must be reliable and safe.

o Must perform well.

10/27/2011

Score Performance Safety Reliabiltiy WeightWeighting factor 10 10 10 5Commercial electromagnet 250 2 8 10 10Rare earth magnet 290 10 5 10 8Custom designed electromagnet 260 10 8 5 6

Page 19: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

19

Subsystem: Wireless

o Must transmit data after reentry.

o Critical to success.

o Must be able to operate legally.

10/27/2011

Score Communication Range Reliablility Logistical ease AccessWeighting factor 10 10 5 5Pair of 900 Mhz Xbee 205 3 10 5 10STX2 transmitter 215 10 7 7 2Digi M10 255 10 7 7 10Spot communicator 220 10 7 5 5APPRS Packet radio 175 5 8 5 4

Page 20: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

20

Subsystem: Power Supply

o 3 Minutes of Power

o Must Sit for 5 Days

o Large, Quick Draw Needed

10/27/2011

Score Cost Safety Draw rate Weight Feasabiltiy ComplexityWeighting factor 5 10 8 5 10 7Super capacitor 295 8 8 1 7 9 6Batteries 218 3 6 5 5 5 4

Page 21: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

21

Subsystem: Heat Shielding

o Siliconeo Inexpensive

o Reliable

o Durable

10/27/2011

Score Safety Cost Durability Reliability Feasibility ComplexityWeighting Factor 3 8 9 9 9 8Thermal Soak 176 9 1 4 8 1 3Ablative 217 8 2 8 7 2 3Silicone 311 6 7 6 6 9 6

Page 22: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

22

Subsystem: Ejection System

o Spring w/Ribbono Safe

o Effective

o Simple

o Reliable

10/27/2011

Score Safety Cost Strength Reliability Weight Feasibility ComplexityWeighting Factor 3 8 9 9 8 9 8Scissor Lift 377 7 8 5 7 7 8 7Linear Actuator 317 8 3 7 8 6 6 4Spring w/ Ribbon 385 9 6 7 8 8 7 6

Page 23: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

23

Subsystem: Nose Geometry

o Nose Assemblyo Stable

o Create Drag To Reduce Plasma Buildup

10/27/2011

Score Cost Stabilization Drag Weight Feasibility ComplexityWeighting Factor 2 10 10 5 8 8Flat 196 3 9 1 2 9 1Conical 207 5 2 8 5 4 5Rounded 163 5 4 4 5 3 3

Page 24: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

24

Subsystem: Fin Attachment

o Strongo Must survive Reentry

o Create Drag to Stabilize Craft

o Must Be Inexpensive

10/27/2011

Score Cost Stabilization Strength Weight Feasibility ComplexityWeighting Factor 2 10 10 5 8 8Fin Can 202 5 5 3 8.00 4 5Mounted 240 3 5 8 8.00 6 2Machined 204 9 5 1 6 9 3Drag Tail 267 7 3 6 7 7 9

Page 25: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

25

Subsystem: Temperature sensor

ThermocouplePros• High temperature rangeCons• Additional hardware needed to

interface with controller

Integrated Chip Pros

• Cheap

• Easily interfaces with controller

Cons

• Poor temperature range

Score Range Precision Feasability CostWeighting factor 10 8 5 5Thermocouple 213 10 6 10 3Semiconductor 209 5 8 10 9

Page 26: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

2610/27/2011

Conceptual Model

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 27: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

2711/1/2010

Page 28: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

2810/27/2011

Electromagnet Modeling

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 29: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

Electromagnetic Equations

o Ampere’s Law:

Simplified to: Where B is the magnetic flux vector.

N is the number of turns.

L is the length, and I is the current.

is μ μo * μr, where μo is the permeability of free space (4πE-7 H/m), and μr is the permeability of soft iron (200).

10/27/2011 29

Page 30: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

30

Electromagnet Matlab Code

o Equations implemented in matlab.

o Takes variety of parameters including: diameter, length, wire gauge and internal battery resistance.

o Another script loops through available parameters building potential electro magnets.

11/1/2010

Page 31: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

31

Preliminary Matlab results

11/1/2010

1 14 27 40 53 66 79 92 1051181311441571701831962092222352482612742873003133263393523653783914044174304434564690

5

10

15

20

25

30

weightteslacoilcurrent

Page 32: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

3210/27/2011

Prototyping Design

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 33: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

33

Subsystem: Risk Matrix/Mitigation

11/1/2010

Consequence

RSK1RSK3 RSK2

RSK5

RSK4

Possibility

o RSK1: Probe fails to be released.

o RSK2: Radio signal not acquired before splash down.

o RSK3: Probe fails during reentry.

o RSK4: Fins shear during reentry.

o RSK5: Recovery system fails.

Page 34: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

34

Prototyping Plan

o Electromagneto Fabricate and Test

o Ejection Systemo Fabricate and Test

o Parachute Systemo Fabricate and Test

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Prototyping will begin later this month and carry into next semester

Page 35: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

3510/27/2011

Project Management Plan

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 36: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

36

Organizational Chart

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Project ManagerShawn Carroll

Team LeaderTal Wammen

Physics Faculty AdvisorDr. Paul Johnson

Engineering Faculty AdvisorDr. Rob Erikson

Aeroframe/Probe HousingJonathan MeltonJeffrey WattersJoe Backstrom

Andrew HellquistEric Robinson

Advanced Heat Shield SystemMichael Stephens Joe Backstrom

Jonathan Melton Andrew HellquistColin Lucas Alex Antonacci

Jeffrey Watters Matthew LehmitzEric Robinson Bryan Overcast

Payload Ejection SystemMichael StephensMarshall MooreBryan OvercastAlex Antonacci

Electrical Power SystemMichael StephensMarshall Moore

Matthew LehmitzColin Lucas

Page 37: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

37

Mechanical Schedule

o Major Mechanical Milestones:o Design Freeze at CDR (11/29/2011)

o Blueprints submitted for manufacturing by CDR

o Mechanical prototype constructed mid-January, 2012

o Mechanical prototype fully tested by end of January, 2012

o Impact and submersion testing

o Electromagnet Testing

o Plasma Testing

o Structural Testing

o Drop Testing

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 38: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

38

Electrical Schedule

o Major Electrical Milestones:o Electrical Schematics completed by CDR (11/29/2011)

o Components ordered by end of November

o Electrical assembly and testing starting this month

o Control function test

o Telemetry and SD card output test

o Fully functioning payload by early next semester

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 39: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

39

Budget

o Mass Budget (14 lbs)o Structure (4lb)

o Probe Housing (1lb)

o NASA Structure (3lb)

o Probe (6.5lb)

o Electromagnet (5lb)

o Aeroshell(1lb)

o Parachute(0.5lb)

o Ejection System (0.5lb)

o Electrical System (2lb)

o Battery(1lb)

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Page 40: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

40

Budget

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Device Price Qty TotalXbee 54.95 1 54.95 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9099Antenna 9.95 1 9.95 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/5587.2 V NiMH Battery 19.99 1 19.99 http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/WTI0001P?I=LXXUP0&P=8Thermocouple 10 2 20 http://www.adafruit.com/products/270Amplifier 10 2 20 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/307SD card holder 2 1 2Power mosfets 4 1 4Arduino MegaNichrome wire 17.32 1 17.32 http://www.amazon.com/Nickel-Chromium-0-0320-Diameter-Length/dp/B000FMUF3A/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1318867750&sr=8-1PC boards 33 1 33

Xbee 54.95 1 54.95 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9099Antenna 9.95 1 9.95 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/5587.2 V NiMH Battery 19.99 2 39.98 http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/WTI0001P?I=LXXUP0&P=8Thermo couple 10 2 20 http://www.adafruit.com/products/270Amplifier 10 2 20 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/3079V 2 2 4 WalmartIron core 15 1 15Copper wire 138 1 138PC boards 33 1 33Rare earth magnet 417 1 417

Total 933.09

AHHS

Payl

oad

Page 41: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

41

Work Breakdown Structure

10/27/2011 Presenter: Tal Wammen

Advanced Heat Shield System

Payload Ejection System (PES)Aeroframe/Probe Housing

• Finalize Schematics• Design Freeze at CDR• Order Parts by End of Fall Semester• Build Circuits• Test Systems

• Finalize Design• Design Freeze at CDR• Order Parts by End of Fall Semester• Build Prototype• Test prototype

• Finalize Design• Design Freeze at CDR• Submit Work Request• Test Prototype

Page 42: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

4210/27/2011

Conclusions

1

2

3

4

5

6

Page 43: Preliminary Design Review Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,

Questions?