Top Banner
Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J. Wolfers, and E. Zitwewitz. Using Prediction Markets to Track Information Flows: Evidence from Google. 2008.
42

Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Mar 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Jaylon Brimhall
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Prediction Markets

J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001.

B. Cowgill, J. Wolfers, and E. Zitwewitz. Using Prediction Markets to Track Information Flows: Evidence from Google. 2008.

Page 2: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Outline

• Introduction to prediction markets• Empirical Paper• Paper on Google and Information Flows• Current prediction markets

Page 3: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

What is the probability that Barack Obama wins the election?

Page 4: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

What is the probability that Barack Obama wins the election?

• Polls– Electoral college– Changes before election day– Bias

• Pundits– “Cheap Talk” Problem

• Forecasting– Individual context

Page 5: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

What is the probability that Barack Obama wins the election?

• New solution: Prediction Markets– A financial “futures” market where money is

exchanged based on the outcome

Page 6: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Winner Takes All (WTA) Market

• Contract has payoff of $0 or $1 based on outcome• Assumption: event has a clear outcome

Obama WinsProbability = p

Obama Loses Probability=1-p

Payoff=$1 Payoff=$0

Page 7: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Winner Takes All (WTA) Market• X is the payoff• P is the probability of the outcome occurring• Let the market price of a share equal c

E(X)=p

p 1-p

X=1 X=0

Page 8: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Winner Takes All (WTA) Market• Expected Profit for buyer:– Profit = Payoff – Cost– E(Profit) = E(X)-c– E(Profit) = p-c

• Multiple, exhaustive markets summing to 1 (no arbitrage)

• Assuming no risk aversion, expected returns should be equivalent in each of these markets

• P=c• The market price is the perceived probability of the

event occurring

Page 9: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Vote Share Market

• Contract pays $1*X, where X is the vote share of a candidate

• For example, the Bush contract in 2004 would have paid $50.70 (Bush won 50.7% of the vote)

• Bidders auction on contract• By similar logic as before, C=E(X)• The market price is the expected vote share

Page 10: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Other Market Types

• Can be used to determine entire probability distributions– For example, a contract can pay off the square of

the vote share– Market price= E(X^2)– Solve for variance

Page 11: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Other Market Types

• Can be used to determine joint distributions– For example, a series of contracts can trade based

on the probability of two events occurring– Market 1: Probability of Troop Withdrawal by 2010– Market 2: Probability of Obama Winning– Market 3: Probability of Troop Withdrawal by 2010

AND Obama Wins– Solve for P(Troop Withdrawal| Obama Victory)

Page 12: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Paper 1

J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election

Futures Markets Research, 2001.

Page 13: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Introduction

• Are prediction markets accurate?• When do prediction markets work?

Page 14: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Methodology

• Ran study on IEM• Continuous double auction market open 24

hours per day• Vote share or seat share market• Traders are overwhelmingly, “male, well-

educated, high income, and young”

Page 15: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Are Prediction Markets Accurate?

Page 16: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Are Prediction Markets Accurate?

• Benchmark: Polls• Short-term, prediction markets are at least as

good as polls– Compared price at midnight on night before

election with last day polls– Average prediction market error=1.49%– Average poll error=1.93%

Page 17: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Are Prediction Markets Accurate?

Page 18: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Are Prediction Markets Accurate?

• Long-term, prediction markets are superior to polls– No empirical methodology given for this assertion– Example from 1996 as worst performing short-term

prediction, yet relatively stable long-term prediction

Page 19: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Are Prediction Markets Accurate?

Page 20: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

When do prediction markets work?

• Necessary criteria– “Enough traders so that the aggregate of their

knowledge can forecast correctly the outcome of the election.”

– Effective market mechanism for revealing collective information

• Markets perform better when:– More active participants– Fewer contracts

Page 21: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

When do prediction markets work?

• Individual Bias– Most traders in a market are heavily biased• Often vote for what they WANT, versus what is LIKELY

– Marginal traders empirically tend to be much less biased

– Marginal traders set prices, not average traders

• Information– Traders have many sources of information• Polls, past results, analysis, etc.

Page 22: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Conclusion

• Under reasonable criteria, prediction markets are effective

Page 23: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Paper 2

B. Cowgill, J. Wolfers, and E. Zitwewitz. Using Prediction Markets to Track

Information Flows: Evidence from Google. 2008.

Page 24: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Introduction

• Uses internal prediction market at Google• Examines efficiency of the market– Conclusion: Relatively efficient with persistent

biases

• Observes demographic and location information on traders and studies the trends– Conclusion: location matters

Page 25: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Google’s Prediction Market

• Internal WTA market for Google employees only• 1,463 employees participated (about 15% at the

time) in 25-30 markets– Not a random sample

• Trades were about:– Google-related events (release dates, sales targets)– “Fun” markets: not Google related

• Trades took place in “Goobles,” which could convert into raffle tickets for prizes

Page 26: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Differences to Consider

• Public vs. Private– Inside information

• Real money vs. Fake money– Do the incentives line up?

Page 27: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

• Favorite Bias– Outcomes that are likely to occur are overpriced– Counter-intuitive: in presence of liquidity

constraints, greater risk can be taken in long-shots versus favorites

– Methodology: break all contracts into 20 bins based on price, and calculate probability for events in that bin.

Biases: The Efficiency of Google’s Markets

Page 28: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Biases: The Efficiency of Google’s Markets

Page 29: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

• Extreme Aversion– Traders misjudge very small probabilities– Counteracts favorite bias at extremes– Also present in Intrade and larger markets

Biases: The Efficiency of Google’s Markets

Page 30: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

• Short Aversion– Traders prefer to hold long positions versus short

positions– Evidence: more arbitrage opportunities exist

where trades sum to more than one than less than one

Biases: The Efficiency of Google’s Markets

Page 31: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

• Optimism– Outcomes that are good news for Google are

overpriced– This effect is magnified on days after the stock

rises– Particularly true in new hires -> traders get

smarter over time– Impact on theory of entrepreneurship

Biases: The Efficiency of Google’s Markets

Page 32: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Measuring the Transmission of Information

• What affects how people trade?– Demographic trends– Intrinsic sentiments such as optimism– Information

• How is information distributed across an organization?

Page 33: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Measuring the Transmission of Information: Methodology

• Observe the impact of holdings other players on a single trader’s holdings

• Uses differences-and-differences OLS method at time of trade

• Ultimate regression (trying to estimate beta):Holdingsof stock sby trader i

Holdingsof stock s

by trader k

Vector of demographic similarities of traders i and k

Error term

Trade Fixed Effect

Page 34: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Measuring the Transmission of Information: Results

• Demographic trends have little effect.• Friendships have little effect.• Professional relationships and functional

position have strong effects.• Proximity has major effects• Limitation: Like-minded people tend to be

proximate– Solution: use people who switch offices

Page 35: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Contributions to Other Literature

• Social Networks– How is information exchanged?• Caveat: what information is being exchanged?

• Behavioral Finance– Psychological biases– Information insights based on local activities

• Entrepreneurship– Consistent optimism among new employees

Page 36: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Other Prediction Markets Applications

Page 37: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Other Empirical Uses• Terrorism Future Markets• Event forecasting (Wolfers)– Looking at the impact of the likelihood of war in Iraq on oil

futures, etc.• Incorporating general election preferences in primary

elections(Wolfers)– Looking at the conditional probability of each candidate

winning the general election given that they clinch the nomination?

• How does the election effect financial market prices? (Wolfers)– Intrade and futures fluctuation on election day in 2004

Page 38: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Will Barack Obama Win the Election?

• Popular vote share (IEM)• State-by-state probabilities (Intrade.com)• Electoral vote ranges (Intrade.com)• Overall Probability (Intrade.com)

Page 39: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Current Democratic Vote Share Prediction = $54.10

Page 40: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.
Page 41: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.
Page 42: Prediction Markets J. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. Nelson and T. Rietz, Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research, 2001. B. Cowgill, J.

Current Price = $63.60