Predictability and Prediction of Tropical Intra-Seasonal Oscillation (TISO) Xiouhua (Joshua) Fu International Pacific Research Center (IPRC) University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii Collaborators: Bin Wang, Bo Yang, Qing Bao NOAA 32 nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
30
Embed
Predictability and Prediction of Tropical Intra-Seasonal Oscillation (TISO)
Predictability and Prediction of Tropical Intra-Seasonal Oscillation (TISO). Xiouhua (Joshua) Fu. International Pacific Research Center (IPRC) University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii. Collaborators: Bin Wang, Bo Yang, Qing Bao. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Predictability and Prediction of Tropical Intra-Seasonal Oscillation (TISO)
Xiouhua (Joshua) Fu
International Pacific Research Center (IPRC) University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii
Collaborators: Bin Wang, Bo Yang, Qing Bao
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Global Impacts of TISO
The TISO
Boreal-winter MJO
Boreal-summer ISO
Eastward
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Intra-Seasonal Variability
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Signal CPL Forecast Error
[ATM: 17 days; CPL: 24 days]Fu and Wang et al. 2007, JAS
Air-sea Coupling Extends the Predictability of TISO
ATM Forecast Error
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
+Wang and Xie (1998)
Air-Sea Coupling Processes
Specific Questions to be Addressed
How will different surface boundary conditions (five different SST settings) affect the TISO predictability (with “perfect” model assumption)? What are the best SST configurations for TISO hindcasts and operational forecasts? What is the “practical” predictability of TISO in a dynamical model (IPRC_HcGCM)?
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Fu et al. (2007), MWR, In press
IPRC/UH Hybrid coupled GCM (IPRC_HcGCM)
Atmospheric component: ECHAM-4 T30L19 AGCM (Roeckner et al. 1996) Ocean component: Wang-Li-Fu intermediate upper ocean model (0.5ox0.5o) (Wang et al. 1995; Fu and Wang 2001)
Wang, Li, and Chang (1995): upper-ocean thermodynamics McCreary and Yu (1992): upper-ocean dynamics Jin (1997) : mean and ENSO (intermediate fully coupled model) Zebiak and Cane (1987): ENSO (intermediate anomaly coupled model)
Fully coupling without heat flux correction Coupling region: Tropical Indian and Pacific Oceans (30oS-30oN) Coupling interval: Once per dayFu et al. 2003; Fu and Wang 2004 (TISO)
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Ensemble ExperimentsWith Five Different SST Settings
Experiment Name
SSTs Used in 90-day Forecasts
CPL SST directly forecasted by interactive air-sea coupling (Tier-one)
ATM Daily SST from the coupled control run after removing 20-90-day variability ( “smoothed” SST)
ATMp Daily SST from the coupled control run is linearly interpolated to the “smoothed” SST within first 10-day forecast (damped persistent SST)
ATMf Daily SST anomaly from coupling to a slab mixed-layer ocean (ML depth = 30 m) is added to the “smoothed” SST
ATMd Ensemble-mean daily SST from the CPL forecasts (Tier-two)
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Experimental Design 2 TISO events (boreal-summer) in a coupled control run (Targets) 4 phases for each TISO event (Starting points) 10 ensemble forecasts starting from each phase of selected events under five different SST settings (80 forecasts per SST setting)
Data Processing TISO: 20-90-day filtered daily rainfall
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Boreal-summer Rainfall over (65oE-120oE)
Targets
Coupled Forecasts (CPL)
Atmosphere-only Forecasts (ATM)
Ten-ensemble-mean
Event-I Event-II
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Ensemble means
ATM/ATMp: 30 days CPL/ATMd: 42 days
ACC
TISO Predictability Measured by ACC
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
(Tier-1/Tier-2)
An MJO event observed during TOGA-COARE1993, Jan. 01-Feb. 10 (boreal-winter)
A monsoon ISO event2006, Jun. 11-Jul. 11 (boreal-summer)
Initialized with NCEP reanalysis 100-ensemble forecasts for each event
TISO Forecast Experiments with IPRC_HcGCM
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
OLRU-850VP-200
MJO Events Observed during TOGA-COARE
1992
1993
Vitart et al. (2007)
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
VP-200Vitart et al. (2007)
Dec. 31,1992
Feb. 1,1993
MJO Forecasted by ECMWF Operational Seasonal Forecast System
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Rainfall
MJO Forecasted by the IPRC_HcGCM
Observation With default cumulus scheme
With revised cumulus scheme
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
OLR
(U850 -U200)
MJO Forecasted by the IPRC_HcGCM
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Atmosphere-only Forecast With revised cumulus scheme
An Experimental Forecast of Monsoon ISO
Boreal-summer Rainfall over (65oE-120oE)
NOAA 32nd CDPW, Tallahassee, Oct 22-26, 2007
Summary
The TISO predictability in IPRC/UH_HcGCM reaches about 40 days averaged over the Southeast Asia. The predictability in the atmosphere-only model is about 30 days. Interactive air-sea coupling extends the TISO predictability by about 10 days.
Tier-two system could reach similar TISO predictability as tier-one system, suggesting that using observed high-frequency SST for TISO hindcasts and using interactive air-sea coupling and forecasted daily SST for real-time forecasts are good options. The optimistic side of this TISO forecast experiment suggests that some current dynamical models are ready to carry out intraseasonal forecast and will provide useful information for extended weather forecast.