Predicates and quantifiers

1

Predicates and quantifiers

Chapter 8Formal Specification using Z

2

Predicates

• A predicate is a logical statement that depends on a value or values. When a predicate is applied to a particular value it becomes a proposition. For example:

• prime(x)• depends on some numeric value of x• prime(7)• is a true proposition; the only devisors of 7 are 1 and 7.• Prime(6) is a false proposition; 6 can be divided by 2,3.• A predicate can be viewed as a propositional function, that

for some set of arguments returns to either true or false

3

Quantifiers

• Consider the following statements:• All cats have tails.• Some people like cake.• Everyone gets a break once in a while.• All these statements indicate how frequently

certain things are true. In predicate calculus we use quantifiers in this context.

4

Universal Quantifier

• The Universal Quantifier is written :

and is pronounced ‘for all’. It is often used in

the form : declaration | constraint predicate Which states the for the declarations given,

restricted to certain values (the constraint), the predicate holds.

5

Universal Quantifier• The constraint may be omitted.• The declaration introduces a typical element

that is then optionally constrained or restricted in some some way: For example:

i: | i < 10 i2 < 100

Which states that for all natural numbers less than 10 their square is less that 100 .

Separators

Constraint Predicate

6

Universal Quantifier• A universal quantifier can be viewed as a chain

of conjunctions. So: i: | i < 10 i2 < 100is equivalent to:02 < 100 12 < 100 92 < 100 If the set of values over which the variable is

universally quantified is empty, then the quantification is defined as true.

i: | 0 i < 0 i2 < 100is true.

7

Existential Quantifier• The Existential Quantifier is written :

and is pronounced ‘there exists’. It is often

used in the form : declaration | constraint predicate The declaration introduces a typical element

that is then optionally constrained or restricted in some way: For example:

i: | i < 10 i2 < 100

8

Existential Quantifier• There may be more than one value of i for

which this is true, in the previous example there are ten values, 0 to 9, that satisfy the predicate. Another example:

Even(x) k: k * 2 = xThe existential quantifier can be

considered as a chain of disjunctions (ors). If the set of values over which the variable is existentially quantified is empty, then the quantification is defined as false.

i: | 0 i < 0 i2 < 100

9

Unique Quantifier• The unique quantifier is similar to the

existential quantifier except that it states that there exists only one value for which the predicate is true. It is written as:

1

• An example:1i: | i < 1 0 i2 < 100 i2 > 80

10

Unique Quantifier• The previous unique quantifier example is

equivalent to saying that the predicate holds for i, but there is no value j for which it holds This is written as:

1i: | i < 1 0 i2 < 100 i2 > 80

1i: | i < 1 0 i2 < 100 i2 > 80

¬(j: | j < 1 0 i j j2 < 100 j2 > 80)

11

Counting Quantifier• Some notations use a counting quantifier that

counts for how many values of a variable the predicate holds. In Z this is not needed, we use set comprehension instead.

12

Set Comprehension

• Set Comprehension:• It is possible to give the value of a set by

giving a condition (a predicate) which must hold true for every member of the set. The general form is:

• {declaration | constraint expression}• SetA ::= {x: | Even(x) x*x}

13

Set Comprehension

• {declaration | constraint expression}• The declaration is for a typical element and

it gives the element’s name and type.• The constraint restricts the possible values

of the typical element. It is a logical expression which must be true for that value of the typical element to be included.

• The expression indicates the value to be held in the set

14

Set Comprehension

• SetA ::= {x: | Even(x) x*x}• The above defines a set of type integer. The

value of x is constrained to be even. Each element will be the square of an even integer.

• SetB ::= {x: | Even(x) x} • The above defines a set of type integer. The

value of x is constrained to be even. Each element will be an even integer.

15

Ranges of numbers

• We have already introduced m..n. This is shorthand for

• {i: | m i n i i}

16

Relationship between Logic and Set Theory

• There is a direct relationship between some of the operations of logic and operations on sets:

• [X] any set S,T: X• S T == {x:X | x S x T x}• S T == {x:X | x S x T x}• S \ T == {x:X | x S x T x}

17

Summary of Quantifier

x:T Pfor all x of type T, P is true.x:T Pthere exists an x of type T, such that P is true.1 x :T P

there exists a unique x of type T, such that P is true.

18

Summary of Quantifier

{D | P t}The set of t’s declared by D where P is true.

19

Mixing Quantifiers

• What is the precedence or associativity used. Is forAll(x),forAll(y) equivalent to forAll(y),forAll(x)?

• Assuming standard notation, they are read left to right; two universal quantifiers following one another commute (just like multiplication a*b=b*a).

20

Mixing Quantifiers

• Likewise, if you have two existential quantifiers, they commute, because

• Exists(x),Exists(y), p(x,y)• is true if and only if• Exists(y),Exists(x), p(x,y)• is true.

21

Mixing Quantifiers• But if you have mixed universal and existential

quantifiers, you have to be careful. If you write

(x), (y), p(x,y)• that means that for each x, there exists a y, which

may depend on x, for which p(x,y) is true.• But if you write

(y), (x), p(x,y)• you are saying that there is a y which works for

any given x (including y=x), that make p(x,y) true.

22

Mixing Quantifiers

L e t t h e p r o p o s i t i o n a l f u n c t i o n g ( x , y ) b ed e f i n e d a s :

g ( x , y ) = x < y

W r i t e e a c h o f t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o p o s i t i o n s i nw o r d s a n d s t a t e w h e t h e r t h e y a r e t r u e o rf a l s e .

12

) ( ( , ) )) ( ( , ) )

x y g x yy x g x y

23

Mixing QuantifiersL e t t h e p r o p o s i t i o n a l f u n c t i o n g ( x , y ) b e d e f i n e d a s : g ( x , y ) = x < y W r i t e e a c h o f t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o p o s i t i o n s i n w o r d s a n d s t a t e w h e t h e r t h e y a r e t r u e o r f a l s e .

12

) ( ( , ) )) ( ( , ) )

x y g x yy x g x y

1 ) F o r a l l n a t u r a l n u m b e r s ( x ) t h e r e e x i s t s a y s u c h t h a t x < y . T h e s t a t e m e n t i s t r u e i f w e m a k e y = x + 1 . W e o n l y r e q u i r e t h e e x i s t e n c e o f o n e y t o m a k e t h e s t a t e m e n t t r u e . 2 ) T h e r e e x i s t s a n a t u r a l n u m b e r ( y ) s u c h t h a t f o r a l l x , x < y . T h e s t a t e m e n t i s f a l s e w h e n y = x . W e o n l y h a v e t o f i n d o n e y t h a t m a k e t h e s t a t e m e n t f a l s e .

24

Exercises

Let O(x,y) be the predicate (or propositional function) “x is older than y”. The domain of discourse consists of three people Garry, who is 30; Ellen who is 20; and Martin who is 35. Write each of the following propositions in words and state whether they are true or false.

25

Exercises

Let O (x,y) be the p ropositional function “x is o lder than y”. T he dom ain ofdiscourse consists of three people G arry, w ho is 30; E llen w ho is 20; and M artinw ho is 35 . W rite each of the fo llow ing propositions in w ords and state w hetherthey are true or false.

),( yxyOx),( yxyOx

),( yxyOx),( yxyOx

26

Exercises

Let O(x,y) be the propositional function “x is older than y”. The domain of discourseconsists of three people Garry, who is 30; Ellen who is 20; and Martin who is 35. Writeeach of the following propositions in words and state whether they are true or false.

),( yxyOx Everyone is older than everyone, False),( yxyOx Everyone is older than someone, False),( yxyOx Someone is older than everyone, False),( yxyOx Someone is older than someone else, True

27

Exercise

Determine whether each sentence 1-5 is a proposition. If it is a proposition write itsnegation.1. Waiter, will you serve the soup?2. Write a program to calculate the distance from A to B3. Four is greater than three.4. The cat is clever.5. Today is Christmas Day..

28

Exercise

Determine whether each sentence 1-5 is a proposition. If it is a proposition write itsnegation.1. Waiter, will you serve the soup? Answer No2. Write a program to calculate the distance from A to B Answer No3. Four is greater than three. Answer Yes. Four is not greater than three.4. The cat is clever. Answer Yes. The cat is not clever5. Today is Christmas Day. Answer Yes. Today is not Christmas The notion of a proposition here is intuitive and id not defined precisely. Roughlyspeaking, a proposition is a fact, which is either true or false. So sentences stating factsare considered to be propositions while commands or questions are not consideredpropositions.