Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6, p.1 (Dec., 2009) Kürşad YILMAZ Pre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles in Turkey Copyright (C) 2009 HKIEd APFSLT . Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2009). All Rights Reserved. Pre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles in Turkey Kürşad YILMAZ Department of Educational Administration Faculty of Education, Dumlupınar University Kütahya, TURKEY Email: [email protected]Received 17 Sept., 2009 Revised 7 Dec., 2009 Contents o Abstract o Introduction o Method o Results o Conclusion and Discussion o References Abstract The aim of this study is to determine Pre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles in Turkey. In addition, differences in pre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles by gender, and field of study were examined. In the study, the survey model was employed. The research data was gathered using the Attitudes
15
Embed
Pre-service secondary science and mathematics …...pre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers enrolled in the secondary school sciences master’s program (without thesis).
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6, p.1 (Dec., 2009)
Kürşad YILMAZPre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles in Turkey
Copyright (C) 2009 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2009). All Rights Reserved.
Pre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6, p.13 (Dec., 2009)
Kürşad YILMAZPre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles in Turkey
Copyright (C) 2009 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2009). All Rights Reserved.
classroom size, teacher perception of self-efficacy and the quality of
teacher-student interaction.
Classroom management styles of pre-service secondary science and mathematics
teachers do not differ according to department. In both dimensions, department
means of secondary education pre-service science teachers are very similar. The
fact that pre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers taught the
classroom management lesson in the same fashion could be influential in this
instance.
References
Akın, U. (2007). Examining teacher classroom management skills according to different
variables and assessing these skills in terms of teacher training. Paper presented at the XVI. National Educational Sciences Congress. Gaziosmanpaşa University. Turkey. September 5–7, 2007.
Altay, S. (2003). Research of the approaches of the primary school teachers about
responsible classroom management which is of the classroom management approaches. Unpublished master thesis, Marmara University, Turkey.
Brophy, J. (1987). Educating teachers about managing classrooms and students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC. April 20–24, 1987. ERIC ED285844.
Doğan-Burç, E. (2006). Elementary school teachers’ classroom management efficacy. Unpublished master thesis, Abant Đzzet Baysal University, Turkey.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 392–431). New York: MacMillan.
English, F. (1992). Educational administration: the human science. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Hanson, E. M. (2003). Educational administration and organizational behavior. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hoy, W. K. (1969). Pupil control ideology and organizational socialization: A further examination. The School Review Quarterly, 77(3–4), 257–265.
Hoy, W. K. (2001). Pupil control studies: a historical, theoretical, and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(5), 424–441.
Hoy, W. K., & Forsyth, P. (1986). Effective supervision: theory into practice. New York: Random House.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: theory, research, and
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6, p.14 (Dec., 2009)
Kürşad YILMAZPre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles in Turkey
Copyright (C) 2009 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2009). All Rights Reserved.
Kellough, R. D., & Kellough, N. G. (1999). Middle school teaching: a guide to methods
and resources. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
Kottkamp, R. B., & Mulhern, J. A. (1987). Teacher expectancy motivation, open and closed climate and pupil control ideology in high school. Journal of Research & Development
in Education, 20, 9–18.
Kuğuoğlu, Đ. H. (2004). Views and suggestions of pre-service teachers graduated from the
department of classroom teaching about their efficiency in classroom management,
according to their own perceptions. Paper presented at the XIII. National Educational Sciences Congress. Đnönü University. Turkey. July 6–9, 2004.
Lunenburg, F. C. (1983). Pupil control ideology and self-concept as a learner. Educational
Research Quarterly, 8 (3), 33–39.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Mankowsky, S. A. (2000). Bureaucracy and pupil control orientation
and behavior in urban secondary schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. April 24–28, 2000.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational administration: concepts and
Lunenburg, F. C., & Schmidt, L. J. (1989). Pupil control ideology, pupil control behavior and the quality of school life. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 22, 36–44.
Martin, N. K. & Yin, Z. (1997). Attitudes and beliefs regarding classroom management style:
Differences between male and female teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX. January 1997. Retrieved on May 15, 2009 from ERIC ED404738.
Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Baldwin, B. (1998). Construct validation of the attitudes and beliefs on classroom control inventory. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33 (2), 6–15.
McNeely, S. R., & Mertz, N. T. (1990). Cognitive constructs of pre-service teachers:
research on how student teachers think about teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. April 17-20, 1990. Retrieved on February 20, 2009 from ERIC ED331810.
Özata, O. (2004). Elementary school teachers’ classroom management efficacy in Karadeniz
Ereğli. Unpublished master thesis, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Turkey.
Pankake, A. (2006). Classroom management. In: English, F.W. (Edt.), Encyclopedia of
educational leadership and administration(pp. 148–150). California: SAGE.
Ponticell, J. A. (2006). Attitudes toward work. In: English, F. W. (Edt.), Encyclopedia of
educational leadership and administration. (pp. 62–63). California: Sage Publications Ltd.
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6, p.15 (Dec., 2009)
Kürşad YILMAZPre-service secondary science and mathematics teachers’ classroom management styles in Turkey
Copyright (C) 2009 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2009). All Rights Reserved.
Savran, A., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2003). Differences between elementary and secondary preservice science teachers’ perceived efficacy belies and their classroom management beliefs. The
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2 (4). Retrieved on December 20, 2008 from http://www.tojet.net/articles/243.htm.
Savran, A., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2004). Preservice science teachers’ orientations to classroom management. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 26, 124-130.
Savran, A., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2007). Turkish preservice science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 23(5), 664–675.
Savran, A., Çakıroğlu, J., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2006). Beliefs of Turkish pre-service elementary teachers regarding science teaching efficacy and classroom management. In: Mutua, K., Sunal, C. S. (Eds.), Crosscurrents and crosscutting themes, (pp. 213–227). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1993). Supervision: a redefinition. USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Skidmore, M. S. (2006). Theory x-theory y. In: English, F. W. (Edt.), Encyclopedia of
educational leadership and administration. (pp. 1018–1019). California: Sage Publications Ltd.
Terzi, Ç. (2001). Identifying the opinions of teachers on classroom management styles. Unpublished master thesis,Anadolu University, Turkey.
Turan, S. (2008). Basics of classroom management. In: Şişman, M., Turan, S. (Eds.), Classroom management (pp. 2–11). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
Walters, J., & Frei, S. (2007). Managing classroom behavior and discipline. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
Willover, D. J., Eidell, T. L., & Hoy, W. K. (1967). The school and pupil control
ideology.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Yalçınkaya, M., & Tonbul, Y. (2002). Perceptions and observations about the elementary school teachers’ classroom management efficacy. Ege Education Journal, 1(2), 96-108.
Yeşilyurt, E., & Çankaya, Đ. (2008). Determining teachers’ qualities in the aspect of classroom management. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 7(23), 274–295. Retrieved on December 20, 2008 from www.esosder.org.
Yılmaz, H. & Huyugüzel-Çavaş, P. (2008). The effect of the teaching practice on pre-service elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy and classroom management beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 45–54.
Zaremba, S. B., & Fluck, S. E. (1995). Gender and patterns of communication. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference on Undergraduate Teaching of Psychology, Ellenville, NY. March 22–24, 1995. Retrieved on February 20, 2009 from ERIC ED389378.