GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (APRIL 2012)
PROPOSED BUILDING
WALLFORT CITY RING ROAD NO. 1
BHATAGAON, RAIPUR, CHATTISGARHFOR M/S CHATTISGARH PROJECT PVT. LTD.
Table of Contents
Item Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM 1
2.1 Exploration Scope 1 2.2 Subsurface Conditions 2 2.3 Groundwater Levels 3
3.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 4
3.1 Foundation Protection 5
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES 6
ANNEXURES 7
Figure 1: Borehole Location Plan Borehole Logs Laboratory Test Results References/Calculations
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (APRIL 2012) PROPOSED BUILDING
WALLFORT CITY RING ROAD NO. 1
BHATAGAON, RAIPUR, CHATTISGARH
FOR M/S CHATTISGARH PROJECT PVT. LTD.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Chattisgarh Project Pvt. Ltd. plans construction of a building in Raipur, Chattisgarh. The
proposed building will consist of a single basement, ground and up to 10 upper floors. The
work of geotechnical investigation was awarded to M/s. Earth Engineering. The field work
and laboratory tests for the geotechnical investigation were completed by Earth Engineering
in April 2012. This report prepared by Geocon International Pvt. Ltd. presents results of the
geotechnical investigation along with foundation recommendations for the proposed
building.
2.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM
2.1 Exploration Scope
Ten Boreholes (BH-1 to BH-10) were completed for the project as illustrated on the Borehole
Location Plan in the Annexure.
2
2.2 Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface profile at this site generally consists of residual soils underlain by Bedrock.
Encountered soil/rock layers are described below;
LAYER I: RESIDUAL SOILS
Residual soils, consisting mostly of Brown sandy clay with boulders, were encountered from
the ground surface in the boreholes. This layer is formed by the complete in-place
disintegration of parent bedrock material to texture of soils. Based on Standard Penetration
Tests (SPT), consistencies of the cohesive soils within this layer was stiff. The lower
boundary of this layer was encountered at depths between 1.5m and 4.5m below ground
surface.
LAYER II: MUDSTONE / LIMESTONE BEDROCK
Brown Mudstone or Limestone bedrock was encountered at depths between 1.5m and 4.5m
below ground surface in the boreholes. The bedrock was typically highly weathered. Core
Recoveries varied between 22% and 95%, generally improving with depth, while Rock
Quality Designation (RQD) ranged between 0 and 80%. Compressive strength of rock core
samples, based on point load index tests and Unconfined Compression Tests on rock
3
samples ranged between 22 kg/cm2 and 1073 kg/cm2. The boreholes were terminated in
this bedrock layer at depths between 6.5m and 10.0m below ground surface.
2.3 Ground water Levels
Groundwater accumulation in boreholes was monitored during and after completion of
drilling activities. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the boreholes. Seasonal and
annual fluctuations in ground water levels can be expected.
4
3.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Bedrock was encountered at depths between 1.5m and 4.5m below ground surface at this
site. Soft weak Mudstone bedrock was encountered in boreholes BH-6 and BH-7.
Spread/raft foundations for proposed building with single basement supported on this soft
weathered bedrock, can be designed for a maximum gross allowable bearing capacity of 50
t/m2.
Hard limestone bedrock was encountered in the remaining boreholes. Spread foundations
for proposed building near these remaining boreholes can be designed for a much higher
gross allowable bearing capacity of 300 t/m2.
The exact areas of soft rock and hard rock should be delineated upon excavation of building
foundations, if the above two separate bearing capacities are adopted.
Minimum footing width should be 1.0m. Maximum settlement of foundations will be less
than 12mm. Modulus of subgrade reactions of 4,000 t/m3 and 30,000 t/m3 can be utilized
for design of foundations installed on soft rock and hard rock, respectively.
5
3.1 Foundation Protection
Results of chemical analysis on groundwater samples enclosed in the Annexure, indicate
that the site falls under Class 1 for sulphate and chloride concentrations (As per IS456 and
as per CIRIA Sp. Publication No. 31). A ‘mild’ Exposure Condition was assigned to this site.
Therefore only following normal precautions are recommended to protect subsurface
concrete and reinforcement.
Type of Cement: OPC or PPC
Minimum Grade of Reinforced Concrete: M20
Minimum Cement Content for spread footings: 300 kg/m3
Maximum Water Cement Ratio: 0.50
Minimum Cover to Reinforcement: 50mm
6
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
The sub-surface investigation was completed generally as per IS: 1892-1979. The field
investigation was carried out using a rotary machine. Casing was used to support sides of
borehole until sufficiently stiff strata was encountered. Standard Penetration Tests (i.e.
SPT) were carried out in soil in accordance with IS 2131-1981. Using this procedure, a 2”
outside diameter split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil by 63.5 kg. weight falling through
75 cm height. After an initial set of 15cm, the number of blows required to drive the sampler
an additional 30 cm, is known as the “penetration resistance” or “N value”.
When SPT refusal was obtained in hard strata, rock coring was done using diamond bit and
double tube core barrel to obtain rock samples. Percent Rock Core Recovery and Rock
Quality Designation (%RQD) were determined. % RQD = 100 x Sum of length of rock
pieces in cms, each having lengths greater than 10cms/Total length of core run.
Sincerely,
GEOCON INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.
__________________________________ Jaydeep Wagh B.E., M.S., P.E. (Geotechnical)
REFERENCES
1) Foundation Analysis and Design, J.E. Bowles, McGraw Hill Publication, 5th Edition, 1996.
2) Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual.
3) Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 2nd
Edition, Terzaghi K. and Peck R. B., John Willey and Sons, 1967.
4) Foundation Design Manual, N. V. Nayak, 5th Edition, 1996.
5) IS:6403-1981, Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations on Soils.
8
SAMPLE CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY
FOR FOUNDATIONS ON HIGHLY WEATHERED BEDROCK (BOREHOLES BH-6 AND BH-7)
________________________________________________ GL +0.0m
Layer I, Residual soils (Clay) ________________________________________________ -1.5m to -2.5m Layer II, Highly Weathered Mudstone Bedrock
(Assuming Highly weathered Bedrock to be a very dense granular soil.)
Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity = qu = cNc + q (Nq – 1) + 0.5 B γNγ sγ (Refn. 5, Table 4-1)
Where, q = Overburden Pressure (i.e. submerged unit weight x depth of foundation) c = Cohesion B = Minimum Width of foundation = 1m
γ’ = submerged unit weight of soil = 1.80
Nc, Nq, Nγ = Terzaghi’s Bearing capacity factors
Sc, sq, sγ = Shape factors = Conservatively assumed as 1.2, 1.2, and 0.6, respectively D = Depth of Footing below basement top = 1.5m
Minimum SPT N value obtained in boreholes = 50 Corresponding friction angle = 40
o (Reference No. 5)
Corresponding Nc=75, Nq=64, Nγ=109 (Reference 5, IS:6403-1981);
Substituting these values in the above equation; q ultimate =qu =[0x75x1]+[1.5x1.8x(64-1)x1]+[0.5x1x0.8x109x0.6]= 0+150+25 = 175 t/m
2
q safe = qu/F.S. = 175/2.5 = 70 t/m2
Restricted to 50 t/m2 to limit settlements as shown below.
9
CALCULATION OF SETTLEMENTS OF FOUNDATIONS (3M X 3M) EXERTING
PRESSURE OF 50 T/M2:
Net pressure exerted by foundations = 50 t/m2 – weight of soil removed by basement = 45 t/m2
From Reference No. 1:
Settlement = S q BE
mI Is
s f=−
0
21'
µ
Where, q0 = Footing Pressure = 45 t/m2 B’ = B/2 (Where B is the width of pressure distribution
� = Poisson’s ratio = 0.3 E = Modulus of Elasticity Is = Influence Factor (Obtained from Table 5-2, Reference No. 1) If = Depth Factor (Obtained from Figure 5-7, Reference No. 1)
m = 4 for center of footing
Very conservatively assuming weathered bedrock within the full influence zone of footings: E value for over-consolidated sand = 105(N)+4000 (Reference No. 1) Therefore, for a SPT N value of 50, E=9,250 t/m2
L’ = 3/2 =1.50, B’ = 3/2 = 1.5, H=6m, and D=3.5m Therefore, M=L/B=1; and N=H/B’=4 and D/B=1.1
Corresponding, Is = 0.43, Conservative If = 1.0 (From Table 5-2, Reference 1)
Settlement of Layer = S1 = 0.143.049250
3.015.145
2
xxxxx−
= 0.014m = 14mm
From IS8009:
Due to Depth Factor, Settlement = 0.8 x 14mm = 12mm
Therefore, Total Settlement = 12mm
������������
��� �������������
� ���
WALLFORT HEIGHT