Top Banner
Prague, 8-11 June 2009 Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674
31

Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Jul 06, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Page 2: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

1. Introduction2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester4. On-Line Diagnostic Methods for Surge Arrester5. TNB Experience6. Conclusion

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Outline of Presentation

Page 3: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Malaysia Isokeraunic Level –200 Thunder Days/Year

Lightning An Issue In Malaysia

Affects Reliability of MV Bare Overhead Line System

Conductor Having Highest Failure Rate

10/94

Lightning in Malaysia

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Page 4: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Lightning in Malaysia

10Mean kA (+)

77Max kA(+)

4Min kA (+)

23Mean kA (-)

295Max kA(-)

4Min kA (-)

172.29Expfactor

21Mean kA

295Max kA

4Min kA

8.20524Density

15.9% Positive

1828Count (+)

9681Count (-)

11509Count Ground Stroke Density Statistics for Malaysia in 2007

Dominated by Negative Stroke

Min = 4 kAMax = 295 kAMean = 21kA

Page 5: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Lightning in MalaysiaMV Overhead Lines Failures Cause by Lightning

Typical Major Causes for MVOH System Breakdown in TNB

3%6%

9%

10%

11%

27%

34%

TRANSIENTLIGHTNINGAGEINGTREESANIMALSPOOR CONTACTTHUNDERSTORM

Page 6: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Lightning in MalaysiaTypical 33kV Surge Arrester Used in TNB Distribution

131kV96kV58kVMaximum Residual Voltage @ In09

168kV

24kV

NER/PC

125kV

24kV

22kV

22kV

Class 1

125A @ 2000μsec

100kA

98kV

10kA

9.6kV

NER

21kA

75kV

50Hz

12kV

11kV

11kV

Line Discharge Class13

Long Duration Current Impulse12

High Current Impulse11

221kVHousing Lightning Impulse Withstand10

Nominal Discharge Current (In)08

29kVMax. Cont. Op. Voltage (MCOV)07

NEREarthing System06

Prospective Short-Circuit Current05

170kVLightning Impulse Withstand Level 04

Frequency03

36kVMaximum Voltage02

33kVNominal Voltage01

33kVMandatory SpecificationNo.

Page 7: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

S/A Failures in TNB DistributionSurge Arrester Failure Statistics

Typical Root Cause to Surge Arrester Failure in TNB Based on Frequency

6%

6%

6%

19% 63%

LightningAgeingProtection MaloperationAnimalOthers

Page 8: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Disconnector Expulsed & Dislodged from Damaged S/A Ensuring Disconnection from Healthy System

• Failed Disconnector Tail Causes Transient Tripping as Current Flows Through to Ground

• Detecting Failed S/A Becomes a Challenge

• Undetected Failed S/A a Liability to Asset

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

S/A Failures in TNB DistributionSurge Arrester Disconnector Tail Failure

Page 9: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Due to Moisture Ingress ~ Corrosion at Disconnector Tail ⇒ Inability to Dislodge

• Use of PVC Disconnector Tail ~ PVC Hardened ⇒Only Partial Disconnection

Failed Disconnector

Tail

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

S/A Failures in TNB DistributionSurge Arrester Disconnector Tail Failure

Page 10: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Exposure to Moisture Leakage through End Fitting

• Usually Related to Wrapped or Slip-in Design – Earlier Technology

• Revision of Technical Specification ~ Use of Polymeric Direct Mould Design to Avoid Voids between Polymeric Housing & Active Parts

• Engineering Practice Update ~ Use of Flexible Copper Braid Instead of PVC Insulated Jumpers

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

S/A Failures in TNB DistributionMoisture Leakage & Contamination

Page 11: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Silicone Housing

MO Varistor

Fiber Glass WrappingImpregnated with

Epoxy Resin

Wrap Design with Epoxy Resin

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

S/A Failures in TNB DistributionMoisture Leakage & Contamination

Direct Mould Design

MO Varistors

Direct Moulded SiliconeOn MO Varistor

Fiber Glass Loop

Page 12: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Higher Requirement for Nominal Discharge Current, Line Discharge Class & BIL for Highly Prone Lightning Areas

• Lightning in Malaysia Mean = 20kA

• Thermal Capabilities to Allow Shorter Cool Down Time to 60 °C

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

S/A Failures in TNB DistributionExcessive Magnitude & Duration of Lightning Surge

Page 13: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Considered EOL After 25 to 30 Successful Full Rated Discharge (10 kA) + Numerous Lower Discharge Rating

• Manufacturer’s Recommendation = 15 to 30 Years Depending on Usage

• Which One’s More Accurate?

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Surge Arrester Diagnostic PlanSurge Arrester End of Life

Page 14: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Consider the Following Ageing Factors:

• Chronological Age

• Cumulative Service Stress

• Abnormal Event Stress

• Technical Obsolescence

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Surge Arrester Diagnostic PlanSurge Arrester End of Life

Page 15: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Impulse Frequency Flashover Voltage Test• Power Frequency Sparkover Voltage Test• Leakage Current Detection Method• Insulation Resistance Test• Infrared Thermography• Partial Discharge Method (New)

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Surge Arrester Diagnostic PlanSuggested Tests & Diagnostic Tools

Page 16: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Leakage Current Detection• Infrared Thermography• Partial Discharge

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Surge Arrester Diagnostic PlanOn-Line Diagnostic Tools - Preferred

Page 17: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Damaged Surge Arrester Loses Characteristic as Insulator at Power Frequency Voltage

• Presence of Leakage Current > 1 mA for Typical MOV Gapless Surge Arrester

• Develop into Earth Fault

• Causing Transient Tripping

• Measurement of High Leakage Current on Bare S/A Down Lead Raises Safety IssuesMohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

On-Line DiagnosticsLeakage Current Detection Method

Page 18: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Moisture Ingress Reduces Resistance of S/A• Failed S/A Allows Higher Leakage Current• Heating of S/A• Higher Temperature between 10°C to 20°C Compared

to Healthy S/A

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

On-Line DiagnosticsInfra Red Thermography

Page 19: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

CESI Recommended Thermographic Severity Level

Severity Level

Overheating Range Action Required Time Frame

4 > 35°C Immediate 0

3 10°C - 35°C Short Interval 1 – 2 wks

2 5°C - 9°C Medium Interval 4 – 8 wks

1 2°C - 4°C Notification 24 wks

0 < 1°C No Action 48 wks

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

On-Line DiagnosticsInfra Red Thermography

Page 20: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Used for Insulation Integrity

• Determine Health of MOV Blocks

• Utilizes Contact Method Using Ultra Wide Band Radio Frequency to Detect Noise Level Produced by Partial Discharge within MOVMohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

On-Line DiagnosticsPartial Discharge Method

Page 21: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Partial Discharge Method

dB Intensity Correlation to PD Severity LevelSeverity

LevelPD Activity

LevelAction

RequiredTime Frame

(Month) dB Level

1 Nil Nil 12 – 18 < 332 Moderate Retest 12 34 – 403 Medium Repair / Replace 6 41 – 47

4 Medium High Repair / Replace 3 48 – 52

5 High Repair / Replace 1 53 – 59

6 Very High Stop Operation / Replace Immediate > 60

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

On-Line Diagnostics

Page 22: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Infrared Thermography in TNB Distribution

• Mainly for Transformers & Switchgears• Also for Loose Contact on Overhead Lines• Seldom Used on S/A ~ Passive & Static• CESI Recommends Hot Spot Detection for:

• Conductors• Supports• Bases• Dead End Tension• Suspension Clamps

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

TNB Distribution Experience

Page 23: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Partial Discharge Field Trial in TNB Distribution

• Field Trial Done in Perak, Selangor, Pahang• Perak Location

• 33kV MFM – Damai Laut Line• 33kV MFM – Pantai Remis Line• 33kV Pantai Remis – Trong Line• 22kV Overhead Lines in Bidor

• High Level of Uncertainty• All Measured S/A Healthy

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

TNB Distribution Experience

Page 24: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Partial Discharge Field Trial in TNB Distribution

• Pahang Location• 33kV Tg Batu – Rompin Line• 33kV Rompin – Tg Gemuk Line• 33kV Jengka – Lepar Utara Line• 33kV Muadzam Shah – Selancar Line• 33kV Jerantut – Kuala Tahan Line• 33kV PPU Cini Distribution Substation

• High Level of Uncertainty• Mostly Measured S/A Healthy

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

TNB Distribution Experience

Page 25: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Location Position R Y BJRNT-HTLG 001 Incoming 25.6 dB 22.3 dB 17.1 dB

JRNT-HTLG 001 Outgoing 22.0 dB 16.0 dB 23.0 dB

JRNT-HTLG 217 Incoming 17.0 dB 25.7 dB 18.5 dB

JRNT-HTLG 246 Incoming 17.3 dB 16.4 dB 20.2 dB

JRNT-HTLG 248 Incoming 17.5 dB 20.2 dB 28.3 dB

JRNT-HTLG 248 Outgoing 25.6 dB 58.3 dB 22.6 dB

JRNT-HTLG 264 Incoming 31.7 dB 35.6 dB 26.5 dB

JRNT-HTLG 264 Outgoing 25.6 dB 38.5 dB 17.5 dB

BMS-SEL 001* Outgoing 26.3 dB 27.3 dB 26.7 dB

BMS-SEL 128 Incoming 08.0 dB 12.0 dB 16.7 dB

BMS-SEL 133 Incoming 10.4 dB 13.3 dB 10.2 dB

BMS-SEL 133 AR Incoming 15.5 dB 12.6 dB 11.6 dB

BMS-SEL 133 AR Outgoing 07.5 dB 08.2 dB 10.4 dB

BMS-SEL 196* Incoming 23.0 dB 34.4 dB 14.6 dB

BMS-SEL 199 AR Incoming 12.3 dB 12.6 dB 12.0 dB

BMS-SEL 199 AR Outgoing 22.0 dB 16.3 dB 20.0 dB

JENG-FLU 001 Incoming 09.2 dB 08.7 dB 10.0 dB

JENG-FLU 001 Outgoing 10.2 dB 14.1 dB 14.1 dB

JENG-FLU 002* Incoming 11.0 dB 04.7 dB 10.8 dB

JENG-FLU 004* Incoming 14.0 dB 11.8 dB 16.7 dB

JENG-FLU 054 Incoming 09.6 dB 13.3 dB 13.5 dB

JENG-FLU 181 Incoming 27.5 dB 27.1 dB 38.8 dB

JENG-FLU 199 Incoming 24.4 dB 26.9 dB 29.2 dB

JENG-FLU PPU Incoming 26.7 dB 10.6 dB 11.6 dB

Location Position R Y BC-CT 001 PPU C Incoming 13.5 dB 17.7 dB 12.7 dB

C-CT 002 Incoming 19.8 dB 56.3 dB 57.9 dB

C-CT 002 Outgoing 24.0 dB 21.3 dB 17.3 dB

C-CT 059 Incoming 19.2 dB 23.4 dB 12.2 dB

PPU CT AR Incoming 16.1 dB 21.0 dB 20.4 dB

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

TNB Distribution ExperiencePartial Discharge Field Trial in TNB Distribution

Page 26: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Partial Discharge Field Trial in TNB DistributionTB-KR 001 Incoming 02.5 dB 02.5 dB 01.0 dB

TB-KR 028 Incoming 03.1 dB 34.0 dB 06.9 dB

TB-KR 041 Incoming 04.0 dB 04.0 dB 01.0 dB

TB-KR 110 Incoming 40.0 dB 17.1 dB 17.7 dB

TB-KR 131-01 Incoming 05.1 dB 00.2 dB 26.7 dB

TB-KR 131-10* Incoming 03.1 dB 10.4 dB 05.1 dB

TB-KR 148 Incoming 15.9 dB 18.5 dB 14.1 dB

TB-KR 180 Incoming 23.2 dB 28.3 dB 29.7 dB

TB-KR 216 Incoming 20.4 dB 24.2 dB 22.8 dB

TB-KR 231 Incoming 11.4 dB 13.1 dB 07.8 dB

TB-KR 267 Incoming 22.8 dB 26.1 dB 18.7 dB

TB-KR 275 Incoming 26.2 dB 23.8 dB 24.4 dB

TB-KR 306 Incoming 32.4 dB 24.2 dB 24.4 dB

TB-KR 357 Incoming 24.6 dB 21.3 dB 26.6 dB

TB-KR 362 Incoming 21.0 dB 21.1 dB 26.1 dB

TJBU-SGCG 01 Incoming 06.3 dB 02.9 dB 02.5 dB

TJBU-SGCG 22/1 Incoming 02.9 dB 01.0 dB 02.9 dB

TJBU-SGCG 27/1 Incoming 10.6 dB 04.9 dB 14.1 dB

TJBU-SGCG 27/3 Incoming 10.2 dB 13.3 dB 13.5 dB

TJBU-SGCG 27/4 Incoming 06.3 dB 03.5 dB 11.6 dB

RMPN-TGCK 013 Incoming 23.6 dB 24.9 dB 20.8 dB

RMPN-TGCK 081 Incoming 27.3 dB 32.0 dB 27.5 dB

RMPN-TGCK 081 Outgoing 0.98 dB 07.2 dB 21.6 dB

RMPN-TGCK 133 Incoming 23.1 dB 18.0 dB 11.6 dB

RMPN-TGCK 169 Incoming 0.96 dB 0.96 dB 0.96 dB

RMPN-TGCK 181 Incoming 10.4 dB 25.1 dB 39.1 dB

RMPN-TGCK 181 Outgoing 24.2 dB 25.3 dB 22.6 dB

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

TNB Distribution Experience

Page 27: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

• Interpretation of Results from TNB Pahang• 159/168 Measured as Healthy S/A• 6/168 having Moderate PD – 12 months• 3/68 having Medium High PD – 3 months

•PD Testing on S/A New ~ Hi-Uncertainty Level• But ~ Better Control for Replacement Strategy• Provide Tangible Reliability Status of OHL• Allow Better Budget Prioritization

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

TNB Distribution ExperiencePartial Discharge Field Trial in TNB Distribution

Page 28: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

TNB Distribution ExperienceInsulation Resistance Test on Faulty Surge Arrester

SA 04

SA 03

SA 02

SA 01

Arrester Specimen

1704

1873

3482

1851

Impedance (GΩ)No.

Source: TNB Research

Page 29: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

1. Low Confidence Level as PD Measurement for Surge Arrester is New

2. Question in Accuracy of PD Measurement ~ Comparative Study with IR Thermography & Leakage Current Necessary

3. Off-Line & Lab Testing Unable to Confirm Surge Arrester Failure

4. Diagnostic Tools Giving Tangible Measurement Gives Educated Guess on Surge Arrester Health

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Conclusion

Page 30: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

5. Allows Techno-Economic Planning i.e. Replacement & Retirement Strategy & Budgeting Priority

6. Gives Opportunity for Structured Condition Monitoring Basis and End-of-Life Evaluation for Surge Arrester

Mohd Faris Ariffin – TNB Malaysia Session 1 Paper ID 0674

Conclusion

Page 31: Prague, 8-11 June 2009 - CIRED · 2018-09-10 · Prague, 8-11 June 2009 1. Introduction 2. Surge Arrester Failures in TNB Distribution 3. Diagnostic Assessment Plan for Surge Arrester

Prague, 8-11 June 2009

Contacts:[email protected]

Ir. Mohd Faris AriffinEngineering Dept., Distribution Division,TNB

Level 11, Wisma TNBNo. 19, Jln Timur

46200 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MALAYSIA

Tel: +603-79679183 Fax: +603-79572895

94/94