Top Banner
Prague 2004
16

Prague 2004

Feb 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Dorti Widita

Prague 2004. Plant Data. Kilns 2 x 1,300 tpd clinker Vertical Coal Mill 15 tph Cement Mills 3 x 100 tph + 1 x 30 tph Own Quarries for Marl, Limestone and Sand Reserves of Raw Materials: Approximately 30 Years for marl and limestone Insulation Material Production Plant RMC Plant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Prague 2004

Prague 2004

Page 2: Prague 2004

Plant Data Kilns 2 x 1,300 tpd clinker

Vertical Coal Mill 15 tph

Cement Mills 3 x 100 tph + 1 x 30 tph

Own Quarries for Marl, Limestone and Sand

Reserves of Raw Materials: Approximately 30 Years for marl and limestone

Insulation Material Production Plant

RMC Plant

Number of Employees: 574

Page 3: Prague 2004

Location of “USJE”

• Located in the southeastern part of Skopje

• 3.5 km. from the center of the town

• Surrounded by civilian houses

Page 4: Prague 2004

The location of the factory brings up the:

ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONQUESTION

Page 5: Prague 2004

The manufacturing of the cement influences the environment

• Excavation of the raw materials changes the landscape• Transportation of the raw materials as a source of dust• The production of clinker has the biggest impact on

the environment– Big usage of energy– Air emissions ( dust, SO2, NOx, CO…)

• Storage of clinker, grinding of clinker and packing of cement are also dust sources

Page 6: Prague 2004

The environmental impact of the working processes of “USJE” has been

mitigated through the technicaltechnical and technologicaltechnological

interventions

Page 7: Prague 2004

These improvements are accomplishedaccomplished through the years

• 1993 – Two concrete silos for clinker (25000 tones each) with a closed belt

conveyer and a complete dedusting system

• 1993 – Electrostatic precipitator for clinker cooler (each kiln has it)

• 1997 – Gasification of the boiler room for production of steam

Page 8: Prague 2004

• 1999 – Bag filters for cement mills 4, 5 & 6

• 1999 – Bag filter for rotary Kiln No. 3

• 2001 – Vertical mill for petcoke, with bag filter and system for fire protection

• 2003 – Bag filter for rotary Kiln No. 4

• 2004 – Puzzolana substituted by Fly Ash

Page 9: Prague 2004

Continuous Emissions Monitoring

• Installation of a network which connects all measuring instruments– Instruments for dust measurement installed on:

• Coal Mills• Cement Mills• Raw Mill Preparation• Exhaust Gases

– Instruments for measurement of SO2, NOx, and flow installed on:

• Stack

Page 10: Prague 2004

• August 2004 – integration of all “in – situ” signals in the network (company “SICK” has installed the software program

“MEAC 2000”)

• ON – LINE regular reporting on a 30 min basis

Page 11: Prague 2004

Trial use of shredded tyres as an alternative fuel in rotary Kiln No. 4

Phase 1:Phase 1: Getting necessary permissions

Phase 2:Phase 2: ACTION PLAN – Internal preparation of the plant

Phase 3:Phase 3: Experimental testing:

15th – 17th September 2004

Phase 4:Phase 4: Results from the testing

Page 12: Prague 2004

Environmental Legislation

• Current Law in force– Limit values:

• SO2 = 400 mg/Nm3 ( mean 67,9-USJE )

• NOx = 1300 mg/Nm3 (mean 834,6-USJE)

• Dust = 50 mg/Nm3 (mean 15,8-USJE)

• Proposed version that is in Parliamentary procedure adjusted to the EU Law

Page 13: Prague 2004

To comply with BAT

• Raw materials handling and storage– Pre-blending system– Excess clinker storage

• Fuel preparation– Bag filter for the horizontal coal mill

• Process– Process optimisation

– NOx reduction

Page 14: Prague 2004

To comply with BAT

• Process (cont.)– Electricity use optimisation– ESP reconstruction or bag filters for cement

mills– Bag filters for clinker coolers– Noise reduction

• EMS establishing– ISO 14000

Page 15: Prague 2004

Cost/Benefit Analysis for BAT compliance

• Estimated total Investment costs 6.100.000 (consultants estimation)

• Estimated Difference in Operation Costs - 475.000 year (consultants estimation)

(Only SNCR increases operation costs)

Page 16: Prague 2004

Conclusion

1. Applying BAT will have an impact on the competitiveness of the company due to a long pay-back period

2. The impact can be minimised by allowing a reasonable number of years for successive investment