Practical Considerations and Solutions for Temperature-Dependent S-Parameter Measurement for Accurate Parameter Extraction of Advanced RF Devices Advanced RF Devices Gavin Fisher, Application Engineer Andrej Rumiantsev, Product Marketing Manager
Practical Considerations and Solutions for Temperature-Dependent S-Parameter Measurement for Accurate Parameter Extraction of Advanced RF DevicesAdvanced RF Devices
Gavin Fisher, Application Engineer
Andrej Rumiantsev, Product Marketing Manager
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF characterisation systems
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Why On-Wafer Over-Temperature Test?
� Devices are increasingly temperature dependent
� RF device characterization and modeling need
S-parameters at several temperature and bias points
� Multiple temps between -40 and 125°C common
� ITRS predicts further extension of the temperature range
"Radio frequency and analog/mixed-signal technologies for wireless communications," International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, ITRS, p.
36, 2011.
Example of FoM: fT(T) and fMAX(T)
P. Chevalier, N. Zerounian, B. Barbalat, et al., "On the use of cryogenic measurements to investigate the potential of Si/SiGe:C HBTs for terahertz
operation," in Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting, 2007. BCTM '07. IEEE, 2007, pp. 26-29.
Motivation: Three Contradictions
� Temperature variation typically requires re-calibration at
every temperature
� Calibration standards are temperature dependent
– Calibration kit (ISS) must be treated appropriately*
� Continuously increasing demand for higher
New challenges hard to deal with
� Continuously increasing demand for higher
characterization frequencies (e.g. mmW range) and
measurement accuracy
A. Rumiantsev and R. Doerner, “Verification of wafer-level calibration accuracy at high temperatures ” in ARFTG Microwave Measurements
Conference-Spring, 71st, 2008, pp. 103-106.
"High-frequency, over-temperature measurements and modeling," in Application Note Beaverton, OR, USA: Cascade Microtech, Inc.
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF thermal test issues
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Intention of Investigation
� Re-visit application note of with modern equipment
and wider measurement range
Calibration / Measurement Issues and Solutions
Problem Solution
RF Standards temperature dependency
Maintain ambient or measure load resistance*)
Probes misplacement w.r.tstandards on transition
Re-adjuststandards on transition
Probe characteristics vary during the calibration process
Calibration duration to be kept as short as possible.
When is the system stable Use of WinCal stability measurements – automated reports possible
*) A. Rumiantsev, G. Fisher, R. Doerner. “Sensitivity Analysis of Wafer-Level over Temperature RF Calibration”, to be presented ARFTG-80th
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF characterisation systems
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Typical on Wafer Test System - Open
Typical on Wafer Test System - Closed
� PNA-X vector network
analyzer from Agilent
� Probe positioners
� Probe station with -60°C
to 300°C thermal systemto 300°C thermal system
� Calibration software
� SMU
� eVue digital vision system
� In a temperature
controlled lab
Engineering on Wafer Test System....
Typical on Wafer Test System
� 110 GHz Infinity probes
� 104-783 W Band ISS
� 1 mm 24 cm Cables
� Anti-moding absorber
13
� Torque wrench
Typical on Wafer Test System
� Dry, frost-free environment
� Auxiliary chucks
� Roll-out chuck
� Stable repeatable platen
� TopHat™
14
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF thermal test issues
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Mechanical Effects of Growth
� Probes grow / retract with temperature chuck in Z
and for E/W orientation in X
� Some movement in Y but comparatively minimal
� For significant thermal changes evaluate theta also
Mechanical Effects of Growth
� Initial contact set to 19370 at ambient
� Initial separation 474 um
Mechanical Effects of Growth
� Position of probes not varied on positioner
� Chuck temperature -40°C
Mechanical Effects of Growth
� Probe contact remade by adjusting chuck position only
� Probes marks are now 550 um apart 76 um delta
� Chuck needs to be raised 37 um higher
Temperature / Electrical Evaluation Work
� Probe equipped with
K thermocouples
and data logger
� Sensors attached to
probe body,
connector and mountconnector and mount
System Stability
� Instrumentation itself must be stable
� Use math / memory at selected IF bandwidth
� Temperature control essential
� For Agilent PNA-X “Error-corrected range 23°C ±3°C
with less than 1°C deviation from calibration”with less than 1°C deviation from calibration”
� Thermal system transitioning can effect room
temperature
System Stability
� System stability can also be measured by conducting a
cal and using a the WinCal monitoring function or by
sequentially conducting open re-measurements
� Example below takes a monitoring measurement every
5 minutes
System Stability Controlled 27°C
� System was stable for 1 hour at 27 degrees
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF characterisation systems
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Measured Electrical Effect of Thermal Transition
� Following calibration another method used WinCal
sequencing can be used to take repetitive
measurements in normal measurement window
� Of primary interest is to be able to see end of change
to determine if the system is stable
Measured Electrical Effect of Thermal Transition -40°C to -20°C
Measured Electrical Effect of Thermal Transition
� WinCal is also capable of showing differences from a
particular trace – Similar to monitoring measurements
Measured Electrical Effect of Thermal Transition -40°C to -20°C
Measured Electrical Effect of Thermal Transition
5
6
7
8
%
Difference in S11 at 95 GHz with TimeDuring -40°C to -20°C Transition, %
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
%
Time (Minutes)
Difference in S11 at 95 GHz
Measured Electrical Effect of Thermal Transition -40°C to 25°C
Temperature Variation S11 with Chuck / Probe -40°C to 25°C
AR2
Slide 31
AR2 It will be nice if you could make a better graph out of here: font size 24pt, better readable... Andrej Rumiantsev, 10/24/2012
Transition +27°C to +75°C S11 Variation
Transition +27°C to +75°C S11 Variation
AR3
Slide 33
AR3 It will be nice if you could make a better graph out of here: font size 24pt, better readable... Andrej Rumiantsev, 10/24/2012
Variation in Phase +25°C to +75°C S11, Degrees
Phase Change +27°C to +75°C Transition
AR4
Slide 35
AR4 It will be nice if you could make a better graph out of here: font size 24pt, better readable... Andrej Rumiantsev, 10/24/2012
Variation in ISS Temperature
AR5
Slide 36
AR5 It will be nice if you could make a better graph out of here: font size 24pt, better readable... Andrej Rumiantsev, 10/24/2012
Variation in ISS Temperature
AR6
Slide 37
AR6 It will be nice if you could make a better graph out of here: font size 24pt, better readable... Andrej Rumiantsev, 10/24/2012
Temperature Variation of Probe Body / Mount
27 °C
Calibrations
-40 °C
-20 °C
0 °C
jn1
Slide 38
jn1 Andrej Rumiantsev 24-Oct-12It will be nice if you could make a better graph out of here: font size 24pt, better readable... jnakaya, 10/31/2012
Thermal transient – 40°C Calibration
� Calibration duration approximately 2 min,
32 frequency points, 100 Hz IF bandwidth
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF characterisation systems
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Over-Temperature Calibration Approach
Device Measurement Procedure
� Reduced set of -40,-20,0,27,75,125°C measurements
� Instrument set up for speed
– 100 Hz IF (20 or lower preferred)
– 32 points segmented– 32 points segmented
� Biasing done manually for single device 0.85 Vb and 1
Vc for all temp points (peak fmax). Automation possible
with sequencing
� LRRM calibration was used
Device Measurement Procedure
� Devices measure cold and biased
� Open and Short de-embedding
structures measured for all
temperatures
� Measurements done in raw and � Measurements done in raw and
corrected
� Raw measurements allow post
calibration manipulation with
different calibration sets
Probe Adjustment
� Load - Probe geometry
adjusted for each temp point
� ISS pre-aligned before
adjustment
� Best results
– Probes at temperature– Probes at temperature
– Move to ISS and adjust
– Move back to wafer until
stable once again
– Full-auto cal at ISS
– Time delay can be
frustrating...
Device Measurement Procedure
� Make sure LRRM is set to calculate Load inductance at
110 GHz
WinCal Speed Improvements
� Repeatability and Validation tests turned off
� Validation can be carried out over wafer using “post-correct reflect” – no measurement required
� Monitoring was left off but this could be done as soon as probes over wafer or correct Raw cal open
Multi-Temperature Calibration Validation
� All calibrations were valid
� Use view data items and drag renamed % to new report
Dealing with Probe Movement
� Probe movement during the cal can effect thru delay
If open validation fails thru delay can be adjusted
Failed Monitoring after DUT Measurements (125°C)
� Likely calibration was just too slow
� Calibration period less that 1:30 a must
Good Monitoring before and after DUT Measurement (75°C)
� If only measuring 1 device monitor after DUT measurement
Technique to Reduce Drift Effects
� Calibrate at higher than required temperature to suit
expected temperature drop
� Re-monitor at desired temperature set point
� Simulated here - chuck temp was at 113°C for 125°C
calibration
Actual device Masons Gain Measurements –Correct Calibration
Actual Device Masons Gain Measurements –Ambient Calibration Applied to Raw Data
Actual Device data – Effect of Different Calibration Applied to the Same Data
Using WinCal to View Differences in Measurements with the Same Calibration
Using WinCal to Compute
Using Wincal to Compute Differences in Measurements from the Same Calibrations
Calibration Error Bound Variation
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF characterisation systems
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Effect of Load Resistance Variation
� 27 calibrations loaded
� Error terms compared by varying load resistance by 1%
� At 125°C load measured 50.75 Ώ using 4156
Variation in Error Bounds with RL Variation for 1% and 2% Load Variation
A Different Approach – Load at DUT Temp
� Assumes that worst variation is load resistance
� Currently the subject of ARFTG paper development
“Sensitivity Analysis of Wafer-Level over Temperature RF
Calibration" to be submitted to 80th ARFTG
� Load resistance measured using parametric instrument� Load resistance measured using parametric instrument
A Different Approach – Load at DUT Temp
� Temperature still changes – Absorber raised ISS from
chuck
� Further experiments to evaluate this approach required
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF characterisation systems
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Use of WinCal for PPR and Parameter Extract
� Measurements of DUT various, Open pads and Short
pads to be in same Report
� WinCal can perform PPR on the fly for all DUT
measurements if required
Use of WinCal for PPR and Parameter Extract
� Preferred is to use Math ScratchPad to product
individual data items – useful for swapping with other
reports
Agenda
� Why on-wafer thermal?
� Investigation background
� RF characterisation systems
� Mechanical effects of temperature transition – probe
and chuck growthand chuck growth
� Measured electrical effect of thermal transition
� Suggested practical calibration approach with real life
data
� Effect of load resistance variation
� How to use WinCal XE to calibrate, de-embed and
measurement data
� Conclusion
Conclusion
� Accuracy of on-wafer over-temperature RF
measurements up to 110 GHz can be improved
� High-speed calibration with monitoring after
stabilisation is the recommended method
� Different calibration required per temperature� Different calibration required per temperature
� Reduce instrument IF bandwidth to highest tolerable,
use low number of points
� WinCal repeatability / verification is not needed
during calibration process over ISS
� WinCal greatly aids the calibration process
Any Questions?
Thank you for attending.
For questions, please contact:
Gavin Fisher, Application EngineerGavin Fisher, Application Engineer
+44-121-2860170