Top Banner

of 16

PQCNC: Kamath presentation

May 30, 2018

Download

Documents

kcochran
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    1/16

    Accuracy at Birth: Improving

    Birth Certificate Data

    Beena Kamath, MD, MPH

    April 27, 2010

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    2/16

    Team

    Beena Kamath, MD (Study Lead)

    Michael Marcotte, MD (Director, QualityMaternity Medicine, Good Samaritan Hospital)

    Roni Christopher (QIC) Edward Donovan, MD (PI-OPQC)

    Carolyn Slone, RN (Antepartum)

    Jennifer Brodbeck, RN (Labor and Delivery)

    Meg James, RN (Manager of Special CareObstetrics)

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    3/16

    Sentinel Event

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    4/16

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    5/16

    Gestational age

    Clinical decisions

    Research questions

    Intervention programs for at risk infants

    If the vital statistics are incomplete orinaccurate, risk status, clinical factors, or

    outcomes will not adequately reflect thepopulation being studied.

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    6/16

    Birth certificates

    From Gould, et al. Incomplete Birth Certificates: A Risk Marker

    for Infant Mortality, 2002.

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    7/16

    Measuring Gestational Age

    LMP Problems with recall Different menstrual cycles

    Ultrasound Compared to references that may not reflect natural variation in

    population Measures size, not time (Mustafa, et al., 2001)

    Clinical (maturational assessment) Not accurate below 28 weeks gestation (Donovan, et al., 1999) Over-estimates age for preterms, thereby underestimating rates

    of prematurity (Alexander, et al., 1992)

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    8/16

    Different results Methods of estimating GA can lead to disparate results, resulting in

    systematic biases

    Post-term birth rates

    Clinical (1.2%) vs. LMP (6.4%)

    Wingate, et al., 2007

    Ultrasound (1.1%) vs. LMP (10.1%) Dietz, et al., 2007

    Rates of prematurity Clinical (7.9%) vs. LMP (9.9%)

    Wingate, et al., 2007

    Ultrasound (7.9%) vs. LMP (8.7%) Dietz, et al., 2007

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    9/16

    Learning from Observations

    (Following the Gestational Age on the Birth Certificate)

    Baby born

    Delivery log printed fromOB TV

    Gestational age transcribed

    directly from OB TV to birth

    certificate worksheet

    What is goingon in OB TV?

    Form completed for

    State & Federal Govt

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    10/16

    Problems with OB TV

    Referral from

    Outside OB

    Pregnant momarrives to GSH

    Is ACOG formAvailable?

    Yes

    No Alternative methods toconfirm GA: asking

    mother herself,

    calling practice

    Document GA

    in OB TV with

    best data

    NICU record

    of GA

    Birth certificate

    record of GA

    OB database

    record of

    GA

    Perinatal Database

    record of GA

    Since OB TV is the source formultiple repositories of

    information, it makes sense to

    make sure OB TV is accurate.

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    11/16

    OB TV Screen Shot

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    12/16

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    13/16

    Our AIM

    To improve the reliability of gestational agerecorded in OB TV from 25% to 75% for GoodSamaritan Hospital by January 31, 2010 in the

    population of women with prenatal care who arepregnant with an infant at least 20 weeksgestation

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    14/16

    ReliabilityatBirth:GestationalA

    geRecordinginO

    BTrace

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    09/01/09 (n=24)09/05/09 (n=11)09/09/09 (n=25)09/13/09 (n=13)09/17/09 (n=18)09/21/09 (n=21)09/25/09 (n=17)09/29/09 (n=19)10/03/09 (n=24)10/07/09 (n=25)10/11/09 (n=13)10/15/09 (n=09)10/19/09 (n=23)

    10/23/09 (n=26)10/27/09 (n=19)10/31/09 (n=16)11/04/09 (n=20)11/08/09 (n=12)11/12/09 (n=21)11/16/09 (n=27)11/20/09 (n=17)11/24/09 (n=25)11/28/09 (n=16)12/02/09 (n=25)12/06/09 (n=11)12/10/09 (n=19)

    12/14/09 (n=21)12/18/09 (n=24)12/22/09 (n=27)12/26/09 (n=05)12/30/09 (n=17)01/03/10 (n=09)01/07/10 (n=19)01/11/10 (n=21)01/15/10 (n=22)01/19/10 (n=18)01/23/10 (n=13)01/27/10 (n=12)01/31/10 (n=08)02/04/10 (n=15)02/08/10 (n=16)02/12/10 (n=17)02/16/10 (n=22)02/23/10 (n=23)

    Day(withn

    umberofDeliveries)

    Percentage of Pregnancy Records with Reliabl

    DailyPerce

    ntage

    MedianCenterline

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    15/16

    Overall Learning/Challenges

    Process is complex.

    Learning OB TV system and people on theground.

    Dealing with attitudes about change. Each community practice has different reasons/

    disincentives for not completing ACOG form andsending it in correctly.

  • 8/9/2019 PQCNC: Kamath presentation

    16/16

    Questions??