Top Banner
1 End Effector Selection and Design End Effector Types General Design Practices Specific Design Criteria Case Studies
27
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ppt End Effector Design

1

End Effector Selection and Design

• End Effector Types

• General Design Practices

• Specific Design Criteria

• Case Studies

Page 2: Ppt End Effector Design

2

End Effector Types

• Mechanical Grippers

• Negative Pressure (vacuum)

• Magnetic

• Hooks

• Ladles (scoops liquid or powder)

• Others (electrostatic)

Page 3: Ppt End Effector Design

3

End Effector Types- Mechanical Grippers

• Parallel Grippers

– Most common

– More accurate

Page 4: Ppt End Effector Design

4

End Effector Types- Mechanical Grippers

• Parallel Grippers

– Most common

– More accurate

• Angular Gripper

– Limited space

– Clearance

• Toggle Gripper

– High mechanical

advantage

– Over centering

Page 5: Ppt End Effector Design

5

End Effector Types- Mechanical Grippers

• External Grippers

• Internal Grippers

Page 6: Ppt End Effector Design

6

• Vacuum

– Suction Cups

– Edge grip

– Specialty

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Flat

Shaped

Bellows

Rough

Surfaces

Page 7: Ppt End Effector Design

7

• Vacuum

• Bernoulli (non-contact)

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Page 8: Ppt End Effector Design

8

• Vacuum

• Bernoulli

• Coanda (high flow, low pressure)

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Page 9: Ppt End Effector Design

9

• Vacuum

• Bernoulli

• Coanda (high flow, low pressure)

• Specialty

– Vacuum/pressure (Coreflow)

– Vacuum/ultrasonic (Zimmerman-Schlip)

End Effector Types- Negative Pressure

Page 10: Ppt End Effector Design

10

General Design Practices

• Minimize weight- affects robot performance– Material selection

– Lightening holes

• Minimize size– Helps minimize weight

– Reduce cantilever load and moment of inertia

– May conflict with flexibility

• Maximize rigidity– Improves positional accuracy and repeatability

– Reduce vibrations

• Maximize holding force– Reliably hold part (without damage)

– Orient part to maximize force in direction of motion

• Maintenance and form factor change considerations

Page 11: Ppt End Effector Design

11

Specific Design Criteria

• Work piece analysis (objects to be handled)

• Process Analysis

• Design Considerations

Page 12: Ppt End Effector Design

12

Work Piece Analysis

• Work piece Dimensions and tolerances

– Determines size and weight of end effector

• Material, stiffness, cost

– Can single tool handle size and shape variation of work piece?

– Is compliance required?

• PV Wafer stack not parallel due to wedge shape of wafers

Page 13: Ppt End Effector Design

13

Work Piece Analysis

• Material and physical properties– Use gripper, vacuum or magnet?

– Permissible contact points• Semiconductor: 3mm exclusion zone

• Hard disk: ID clamp zone, OD chamfer

• PV wafers: contact top surface but minimal edge contact

– Permissible grip forces• High force on PV wafer surface creates micro-cracks

• Need to control force and clamping speed?

– Weight and balance of part• Quantity and location of grip points

– Surface finish and shape• Vacuum for smooth flat surfaces, mechanical gripper for round parts

• Surface texture and condition (oily, sticky)

Page 14: Ppt End Effector Design

14

Process Analysis

• Manual or automated– Take tool to part or part to tool?

• Range and quantity of parts– Hard disk tools require multiple form factors (48, 65, 78, 84, 95mm)

– Automated or manual tool change

• Presentation and disposition– Position and orientation at pickup and drop-off

– Dimensional clearances to avoid interferences

Page 15: Ppt End Effector Design

15

Process Analysis

• Sequence of events and cycle time requirements– Number of end effectors

– batch processing

• Environment– Cleanliness

– Temperature (environment or workpiece)

– Atmospheric or Vacuum

– Chemicals

– Vibration and shock

• In process inspection requirements– Add gauging to end effector

– Compatibility with inspection process

Page 16: Ppt End Effector Design

16

Design Considerations

• Cost

• Flexibility

• Changeover

• Safety (lost of power, collision)

• Handling of damage product

• Sensing

– Part sensing

Page 17: Ppt End Effector Design

Case Studies

Page 18: Ppt End Effector Design

18

Case Studies

• Vacuum end effector- Hot wafers

• Bonded wafers

• Picking wafer from blind pocket

• PV cell handling- high speed

• PV cell handling- perforated wafers

Page 19: Ppt End Effector Design

19

Hot Wafers- Vacuum End Effector

• Problem: How to pick up a hot wafer with a cold vacuum end effector?– Wafer deforms (warps) due to temperature gradient and breaks vacuum.

• Solution: a paddle type end effector with a low thermal mass insert made from low thermal conductivity material.

Page 20: Ppt End Effector Design

20

Hot Wafers- vacuum end effector

Quartz

Insert

O-ring

Spring

Page 21: Ppt End Effector Design

21

Warped Wafers- vacuum end effector

• Problem: Bonded wafers are often deformed (warped or bowed).– Edges are sharp and brittle and can not be handled with edge grip end

effectors

– Will not hold vacuum with rigid vacuum pads

• Solution: compliant vacuum pads

Page 22: Ppt End Effector Design

22

Warped Wafers- vacuum end effector

Vacuum

pads

Pad snaps onto a ball

shaped receptor and

“rocks” +/-1deg

Page 23: Ppt End Effector Design

23

Top Surface, Non-contact Pick-up

• Problem: How to pick up a wafer from a blind pocket- without touching top surface

• Vacuum will not work

• Solution:

• Bernoulli gripper creates low pressure for pickup

• Edge support prevents contact with wafer surface

Page 24: Ppt End Effector Design

24

Top Surface, Non-contact Pick-up

Bernoulli

gripper

housing

Wafer contacts housing

only at the edge

Page 25: Ppt End Effector Design

25

PV wafer handling

• Problem: How to pick up and drop off PV wafers at 3600pph without damage

– Off flat belt

– Off stationary coinstack

– Cycle time is limited by pickup and dropoff- not robot speed

• Solution:

– High flow low vacuum, generate at point of use

• Rapid pickup, low stress on wafer

– Built-in blowoff for quick release of wafer

– Rigid, large contact surface for high holding force with non-marking wafer support

Page 26: Ppt End Effector Design

26

PV wafer handling

• Videos

– High speed pickup and dropoff

– Slow motion of pickup and dropoff

– 7200pph (for alternative subtrate)

Page 27: Ppt End Effector Design

27

PV wafer handling- Fragile

• Problem: Pick up highly fragile partially perforated wafers off coinstack.– Wafers stick together through

surface tension

– Vacuum applied on top wafer leaks through and holds on to wafers below

• Solution:– Add blowoff nozzle to separate

cells

– Change vacuum pattern with compliant seal in non-perforated cell area