Pp 5.1 standohyd competition comparison incl drf

04/12/23 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

STANDOHYD BASECOAT

Standohyd CompetitionComparison


Competition Comparison


Competition Comparison

The results presented are based on factual data taken from Technical Data Sheets, and the practical findings of Standox Technicians and customers in evaluation of these products in six different countries.

Spain, Germany, Netherlands, Germany, UK and Standox International Training.


Standox Glasurit Nexa PPGSikkens RM DuPontStandohy

dSeries

90Autowav

eAquabas

eEnvirobas

e Onyx HD CromaxName

64 58 59 63 66 53 67No of

Toners

Binder Urethane Disp Urethane ResinWB Acryl Resin Microgel Urethane ResinUrethane ResinUrethane Acrylate

VOC g/l 250 - 410 420110 - 130 ? 480 420

100 - 420

Shelf Life 24 months -

18 months No limit

36 months

24 months

Mixed life 6 months

6 months

24 - 36 h

3 months - 7 days

24 months

Mix ratio

100 - 10% 2:1

100-10/20 10:1:1 100:30 100:60 RFU

Competitors - System Overview

No of Coats

0.5 + 1 + 0.25 2 + 0.5 2 + 1 to 2

1 + 0.5 + 0.25 2 to 4

1 to 3 + 0.5 2 + 0.25


1.0 0.5 0.25

STA

ND

OX

0.51.0 0.25NEX

A

1.01.0 0.25

Du

Pon

t

1.0 1.0 0.50.5

SIK

KEN

S

1.0 1.0 0.5

GLA

SU

RIT

1.01.0 1.0 0.5

PP

G-R

MApplication – Number of Spray Passes


STA

ND

OX

0.51.0 0.25NEX

A

1.01.0 0.25

Du

Pon

t

1.0 1.0 0.50.5

SIK

KEN

S

1.0 1.0 0.5

GLA

SU

RIT

1.01.0 1.0

PP

G-R

M

Number of Spray Passes “Work & Wait” Time (Front end, no dryers.

From TDS)

11 min

19 min

0 min

22 min

24 min

26 min

1.0 0.5 0.25

STA

ND

OX


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low

Standohyd DuPontSikkensPPGNexaGlasurit

Competitive System Characteristics

Activity compared


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Ease of application (full panel) Full panel


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Overspray absorption Full panel


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Sand-ability / de-nib Full panel


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Mottling - clouding Full panel


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Aluminium appearance Full panel


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Opacity covering power Full panel


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Material consumption (Ford Mondeo Bonnet and wing) Green Pearl

460g

635g676g

510g524g

486g

Full panel


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low

Standohyd SikkensNexaPPGGlasuritDuPont


Total rating for all compared properties

54

45

3740

35

53

Best Worst

Full panel



Part IIFade out area


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Ease of application fade out (gold metallic) Fade out


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Cloudiness of fade out area Fade out


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Silver halo / band Fade out


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Aluminium structure Fade out


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low



Flop tone of the blend area Fade out


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low

Standohyd Sikkens PPGGlasuritDuPont Nexa


Total rating for all compared properties

40

35

40

3027

35

Best Worst

Fade out


10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

High

Low

Standohyd Sikkens PPGNexaGlasurit DuPont


Total rating for all compared properties full panel and fade out

9480 77 70

62

88

Best Worst


Strengths and Weaknesses

StrengthsBright clean silver colour tonesApplication is near fool-proofSilver colours sand-able wet or dryNot difficult to blend on small repairs

WeaknessesVery poor overspray absorptionSilver colours settle in the canAll non-Silver colours are poor performingOpacity not consistentSensitive to spray gun choice (WSB too small)High material consumptionMixing accuracy when using concentrated toners

90 Line


StrengthsBasecoat can be sandedBright Silvers have a good-fine effectUse of coagulant

WeaknessesMultiple coats requiredHigh material consumptionDry control coat can shift the final colour tonePoor opacity for many coloursClouding/mottling possible with light colours

Wave 21



StrengthsOpacity goodBlending not difficultGood metallic appearance

WeaknessesBasecoat remains very sticky can not tak-wipeNo chance to de-nibMixing very complicatedShort mixed pot lifeOpacity not as good as Standox

Aquabase



StrengthsGood to sprayFast inter coat flash off until multiple coats usedGood to dry de-nibGood overspray absorption

WeaknessesVery poor opacity on some colours (reds)Large colour change wet to dry (reds are pink then red)Metallic colours can appear to sparkle/glitter

Envirobase



StrengthsColour documentation

WeaknessesLong process timesMultiple coatsDifficult for blend-in/fade outColour accuracy to the vehicle



StrengthsColour documentationBasecoat can be masked for two-tone coloursReady to use (no-mixing)One visit application

WeaknessesMaterial consumptionEnd flash off can be long without blow-dryers

Cromax



StandohydStrengthsEasy to applyVery good opacityOne visit applicationCan be de-nibbed and tak wipedGood to fade outLow material consumption

WeaknessesSome Silver colours can appear glittery Dirty colour tonesBits in the filter can be seen after straining


Pp 5.1 standohyd competition comparison incl drf

Technology

t e r n

t s p r e s e n t e

s h e e t s

n d s t

n e t h e r

o n d e o b o n n e

s e d o n f

e n f r o