Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 1 Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Assessments at Nuclear Power Plant Sites Yannis F. Dafalias, Ph.D. Department of Mechanics, National Technical University of Athens Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis Mahdi Taiebat, Ph.D., P.Eng. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 1Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Assessments at Nuclear Power Plant Sites
Yannis F. Dafalias, Ph.D.Department of Mechanics, National Technical University of Athens
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis
Mahdi Taiebat, Ph.D., P.Eng.Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 2Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Recent Research Solicitation from NRC of the USA
• Investigation and Modeling of Element-Level Soil Behavior under Multi-Dimensional Loading- Solicitation Number: 04-10-147
- Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Office: Office of Administration
- Location: Division of ContractsAppendix A: "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10CFR Part 50, General Design Criterion (GDC) 2, "Design Bases for Protection Against Natural Phenomena," requires, in part, that nuclear power plant structures, systems, and components (SSCs) important to safety must be designed to withstand the effects of natural phenomena (such as earthquakes) without loss of capability to perform their safety functions. This includes not only the effects of shaking, but also possible shear or volumetric deformations in the underlying geologic foundation materials.Regulatory Guide 1.198, "Procedures and Criteria for Assessing
Seismic Soil Liquefaction at Nuclear Power Plant Sites,"provides guidance on seismic assessments, but currently provides minimal guidance on how to conduct deformation assessments.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 3Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Outline
• Simple explanation of liquefaction
• Extensive photographic exposition of liquefaction catastrophes
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 4Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Liquefaction
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 5Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 6Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
1964 Niigata earthquake (photo: NISEE)
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 7Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
1964 Niigata earthquake (photo: NISEE)
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 8Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Surface rupture: Taiwan
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 9Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Surface rupture: Taiwan
• Surface ruptures during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake caused extensive damage to civil infrastructure in Taiwan.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 10Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Surface rupture: Taiwan
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 11Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Surface rupture: Taiwan
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 12Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Surface rupture: Taiwan
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 13Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Adapazari - Liquefaction Effects on Shallow Foundations
• Widespread damage to buildings occurred throughout Adapazari, Turkey, during the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. A major cause of damage was liquefaction of the recent alluvial deposits that underlaid large portions of the city. The result was excessive settlements and bearing capacity failures for countless buildings, most of which were supported on shallow foundations.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 14Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Adapazari - Liquefaction Effects on Shallow Foundations
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 15Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Tanks on Liquefied Ground
• The 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan in which various liquefaction effects on tanks and their foundations were observed.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 16Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Dakai Subway Collapse
• The collapse of the Dakai subway during the 1995 Kobe EQ was the first case of a subway station collapsing due to an earthquake. This case history has since been widely analyzed for its lessons on seismic soil-structure interaction effects.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 17Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Liquefaction Damage to Ports in Kobe, Japan
• Port and waterfront facilities in Kobe, Japan, suffered extensive damage due to liquefaction during the 1995 Kobe earthquake. The problem was pervasive because the majority of the waterfront facilities were reclaimed lands consisting of loose to medium-dense cohesionless fills.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 18Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Liquefaction Damage to Ports in Kobe, Japan
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 19Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Liquefaction Damage to Ports in Kobe, Japan
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 20Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Lower San Fernando Dam - Liquefaction-induced Failure of the Upstream Slope
• The upstream slope of the Lower San Fernando Dam, in California, failed due to liquefaction during the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. The dam was constructed by "hydraulic filling," which involves mixing the fill soil with a large amount of water, transporting it to the dam site by pipeline, depositing the soil and water on the embankment in stages, and allowing the excess water to drain away. The fill that remains is loose, and is subject to liquefaction as the result of earthquake shaking.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 21Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Lower San Fernando Dam - Liquefaction-induced Failure of the Upstream Slope
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 22Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Lower San Fernando Dam - Liquefaction-induced Failure of the Upstream Slope
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 23Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Consequences of liquefaction
• Loss of bearing support
• Settlements – can be uniform in some cases, but are mostly abrupt and non-uniform
• Floatation of buried structures, such as underground tanks
• Loss of lateral support [piles extending to or through the liquefied soil layer(s)]
• Increased lateral pressures against retaining structures, such as quay walls
• Lateral spreads (limited lateral movements)
• Lateral flows (extensive lateral movements)
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 24Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Fundamentals of liquefaction behavior
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 25Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Basics
• Triaxial setting:
- At critical state
Loading of saturated sands
Stress paths for monotonic drained loading with constant p' and undrained loading (constant volume shearing) of saturated loose-
of-critical and dense-of-critical sands
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 26Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 45Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Constitutive Model ValidationConstant-p cyclic triaxial tests - Toyoura sand
Experiment Simulation Experiment Simulation
Data: Pradhan et al. (1989)
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 46Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Fully Coupled u−p−U Finite Element
• Formulation: Zienkiewicz and Shiomi (1984), Argyris and Mlejnek (1991)- u – displacement of solid skeleton (ux,uy,uz)- p – pore pressure in the fluid- U – displacement of fluid (Ux,Uy,Uz)
• Equations:- Mixture Equilibrium Equation:
- Fluid Equilibrium Equation:
- Flow Conservation Equation:
• Features:- Takes into account the physical velocity proportional damping- Takes into account acceleration of fluid- Is stable for nearly incompressible pore fluid
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 47Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Liquefaction-Induced Isolation of Shear Waves
10m soil column – level ground
Permeability=10-4 m/s
Finite element model
Free drainage from surface
Analysis:
Self-weight & shaking the base
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 48Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Void ration vs. Time Acceleration vs. Time
Uniform Layered Uniform Layered
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 49Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Centrifuge test data Finite Element (FE) analysis
(mathematical model)
Analysis
• Match the results of “centrifuge test” with “FE analysis”
• Parametric study on the calibrated FE model for different EQ, soil properties, etc.
Dafalias & Taiebat (NTUA, UCD, UBC) Democritus , July 2011 50Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards Mitigation at NPP Sites
Conclusion
• Nuclear Power Plant construction is of enormous complexity• Increased safety design is required • Earthquake induced liquefaction is a catastrophic natural hazard• Assessment and remediation requires advanced methods of analysis • Predominant methods are
- centrifuge physical modeling
- laboratory sample experimental data
- inelastic constitutive modeling of soil
- numerical dynamic analysis of earthquake event
• Final hazard assessment can be made within degrees of approximation• Even the most advanced methods cannot predict the unexpected• Choice of site is of paramount safety importance