One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Improve Hurricane Improve Hurricane Protection to the Protection to the IHNC Partnering IHNC Partnering Update Brief Update Brief August 21, 2007
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable
1
Improve Hurricane Improve Hurricane Protection to the IHNC Protection to the IHNC Partnering Update BriefPartnering Update Brief
August 21, 2007
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable2
Interim Project Update
Permanent Solution Project Update
Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Process
Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA)
Agenda
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable3
No option achievable before Hurricane season 2009 Raising the walls
Constructability challenges Limited Right of Way and room for construction
8.5 miles total of floodwalls and gates 4.2 miles South of I-10 overpass on IHNC
Impacts on commercial industry Temporary Barge Gate
Constructability challenges Akin to permanent structure
Potential for NEPA impacts Impacts on navigation
Constrictions Potential for NEPA impacts Impacts on navigation Real Estate
Interim Protection Challenges
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable4
Barge Gate Reviewing designs based on updated 100yr elevation design criteria
Differential head, Impact loads Required Real Estate owned by NASA, Port of New Orleans
Allows for expedited real estate acquisition process ERDC optimizing channel opening for velocity and navigation
Goal is to eliminate center pier and one bulkhead Eases navigation and environmental impact concerns
MVN/HPO Environmental determining best method to achieve NEPA compliance – ERDC analysis is crucial
HPO Contracting determining best expedited means for contract mechanisms MVN H&H modeling inundation maps for 4 scenarios (Current conditions, With
Barge Gate, Walls S of I-10 at el. 15’, All walls on IHNC at el. 15’) Working in conjunction with A-E to refine cost, all aspects of design and
construction schedules, and ways to expedite delivery Final Schedule and Cost analysis to be complete once refined designs are
complete – joint HPO/A-E effort Goal remains all efforts complete NLT 31 AUG 07
Interim Protection Path Ahead
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable5
100-yr IHNC Project
Provide a 100-year Level of Protection to the IHNC from
Hurricane-Induced Storm Surges by the 2011 Season
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable6
Project Status
Advertised Phase One July 2nd
Short-listed to the four most qualified firms: Tetra Tech, EC, Inc Kiewit Federal Group, Inc Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc Washington Group International, Inc/Interbeton, Inc JV
Next step – Phase Two Draft RFP
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable7
Timeline (est.)
Issue Notice to Proceed for Construction 1 Sept 08
Phase 1 – Request for Proposals
NEPA / IER complete June 08
PCA Amended (if needed) per 30% Design
Amended PCA Executed
Real Estate Acquisition complete by Dec 08
Phase 2 – Request for Proposals (Issue Sept 07)
Award Design-Build Construction Contract Mar 08
Contractor Prepares 30% Design by June 08
Complete by 1 Jun 2011
Construction
Final Funding Notification
Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) Negotiation
PCA Executed Feb 08
Contractor Completes Design
Phase II RFP Issued Sept 24, 2007
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable8
Draft RFP Process Issue draft RFP to local sponsor and short-
listed firms this week
Meet individually with firms 4-6 Sept
Meet with local sponsor Sept 11th to review Draft RFP comments
Final RFP pre-release meeting with local sponsor Sept 18th
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable9
Phase II Proposals
Open to all alternatives
No navigation requirement on the MRGO Will modify if Congress doesn’t act Concept design complete for deep-draft nav
No assumptions for Seabrook
Bayou Bienvenue must remain open
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable10
Alternative A
IHNC Alternative Concepts
Alternative B
Alternative C Alternative D
Alternative A
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable11
NEPA Alternatives
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable12
Evaluation Criteria
Most Probable Schedule
Technical Solution
Management Approach
Most Probable Lifecycle Cost
Socioeconomic Plan
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable13
Technical Performance Specs
100-year design elevations
Navigable structures
Barriers (walls, levees, etc.)
Minimize OMRR&R
Training Requirements
Environmental Requirements
Construction Management & Safety
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable14
Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA)
Project is fully funded by U.S. Government
USACE shall afford the Non-federal sponsor (DOTD/ SLFPAE) the opportunity to review and comment on all aspects of the project
Non-federal sponsor responsibilities: Provide all non-federal government lands Secure commandeering order(s) (if available) to all private lands Operate, maintain, repair, rehabilitate, replace project
Hold and save the Government free from damages
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable15
Questions/Comments