POVERTY TRAP IN NIGERIA: THE INSTITUTION OF ZAKĀH AS A PANACEA By SURAJU, Saheed Badmus Department of Islamic Studies College of the Humanities Al-Hikmah University, Ilorin 08055758746/ 08189060612 [email protected]/[email protected]Abstract It is obvious that Nigeria, as a country, is faced with extremely difficult problems of poverty despite the abundance wealth which she is blessed and endowed with. Majority of Nigerians are wallowing in abject poverty despite the series of programmes and approaches launched by the government at all levels to alleviate the existing high rate of poverty in the country. These programmes, which were being sponsored with huge amount of money, have failed to ameliorate the situation. This means that, Nigeria has lost directions to the right measure of poverty alleviation. Hence, this paper looks into the historical trends of poverty in Nigeria and the various policies and programmes initiated by the government to tame this endemic malady. It reveals that concentration of wealth to some minorities in the country is the bedrock of poverty. The paper then concludes by suggesting and presenting the Islamic institution of Zakāh as a divine panacea to the problem of insufficiency and inadequacy of the basic needs of life; such as food, clothing and shelter. Keywords: Institution, Nigeria, Panacea, Poverty, Zakāh Introduction 1
26
Embed
POVERTY TRAP IN NIGERIA: THE INSTITUTION OF ZAKĀH AS A PANACEA
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
POVERTY TRAP IN NIGERIA: THE INSTITUTION OF ZAKĀH AS A PANACEA
By
SURAJU, Saheed BadmusDepartment of Islamic Studies
It is obvious that Nigeria, as a country, is faced with extremelydifficult problems of poverty despite the abundance wealth whichshe is blessed and endowed with. Majority of Nigerians arewallowing in abject poverty despite the series of programmes andapproaches launched by the government at all levels to alleviatethe existing high rate of poverty in the country. Theseprogrammes, which were being sponsored with huge amount of money,have failed to ameliorate the situation. This means that, Nigeriahas lost directions to the right measure of poverty alleviation.Hence, this paper looks into the historical trends of poverty inNigeria and the various policies and programmes initiated by thegovernment to tame this endemic malady. It reveals thatconcentration of wealth to some minorities in the country is thebedrock of poverty. The paper then concludes by suggesting andpresenting the Islamic institution of Zakāh as a divine panacea tothe problem of insufficiency and inadequacy of the basic needs oflife; such as food, clothing and shelter.
Silver, Coal, Bitumen and so on (Ali, 2011). Surprisingly, all
these resources have not brought about changes to both the economy
of the nation and the standard of living of the citizens because
they are being controlled by some set of people who are believed
to be the “higher class citizens”.
Thus, Nigerians believed to be lower class citizens are
living by the theory of the survival of the fittest which means
that only those that can manoeuvre their ways in the economic
struggle will live comfortably while those that cannot will
continue to wallow in poverty. This has become a serious
challenge and threat to both the government and the individual in
the area of national growth and development.
It is against the above backdrop that the trends of poverty
in Nigeria and the various policies initiated by the governments
to ameliorate the suffering of the masses in the country shall be
discussed. Also, the Islamic approach to rectify this anomaly as
well as the practical ways this can be implemented shall be
discussed.2
To accomplish this, the paper is divided into sections: the
abstract, the introduction, the conceptual definition, the trends
of poverty in Nigeria, the successive government effort at
alleviating poverty, the effects of poverty on Nigerians, the
Islamic approach to eradicating poverty through the institution of
Zakāh and the conclusion.
Conceptual Definition
It is pertinent at this juncture to briefly examine some
concepts which are integral to this discussion so as to enhance
the understanding of this topic. The concepts are trends, poverty,
institution, panacea and Zakāh.
Trends: A general direction in which a situation is changing
or developing. It could be economic, social or political trend.
Poverty: According to Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary
(2000: 901,910), it is the state of being poor while poor means
having very little money or not having enough money for basic
needs. It is insufficiency of means relative to human needs. In
the opinion of the United Nation (Wikipedia, 2012), poverty is the
lack of basic capacity to participate effectively in the society.
It means not having enough food and clothing for a family, not
having a school or clinic to go, not having the land to grow one’s
food or a job to earn one’s living, not having access to credit,
etc. It means insecurity, powerlessness and exclusion of
individuals, households and communities. It also means
susceptibility to violence, and it often implies living in a
marginal or fragile environment without access to clean water and
sanitation. In the submission of Atanda (2009:34), poverty is the
neediness, lackness, insufficiency, beggary, want and inadequacy
of basic needs of life and existence.
3
Institution: A custom or system that has existed for a long
time among a particular group of people. It is also any structure
or mechanism of social order and cooperation governing the
behaviour of a set of individual within a given community.
Panacea: Something that will solve all the problems of a
particular situation. It is a solution or remedy for all
difficulties.
Zakāh: It is an Arabic word from the root Za-ka-a (Cowan,
1974), which indicates two basic meaning; one relating to purity
and someone or something from evil deeds and characteristics as
well as filth sins while the other is growth which is increase and
progressive development in strength towards maturity and to expand
in capacity in order to fulfill those beneficial functions for
which one is created (Abu Salmān, 2013). According to Abdalati
(1996: 95), it is the annual amount in kind or cash which a Muslim
with means must distribute among the rightful beneficiaries. It is
the act of setting aside a portion of your wealth for the needy
and poor (Al-Maududi, 1985:197).
The Trends of Poverty in Nigeria
Poverty has been a serious challenge to its victims in
Nigeria. It has humiliated and demoralized them as well as made
life worrisome for them to habitate. In his submission on this,
Ukpong (1996) as quoted by Adibe (2012) says:
Poverty has earned recognition in the extent of itsravaging society and the affairs of humanity at theinternational, national and local levels… The needexists now for urgent actions towards its eradicationand control… Indeed, poverty is a snare. It isdehumanizing…
As regards the trends of poverty in Nigeria, it has been
noted that eighty per cent (80%) of Nigerians lives in abject4
poverty which gives rise to societal corruption of all kinds, thus
making it difficult to be checked and controlled. Corruption has
become a policy nationally approved indirectly at the federal,
state and local levels of the Nigerian system of government, as a
result of poverty. The majority of Nigerians are living under $1
per day which denotes inequality in income distribution. While
half (1/2) of the citizens live under $2 daily as two-thirds (2/3)
are struggling to survive under $1.25 per day. Thus Nigeria, as
claimed by Popoola and Olaniyan (2011), is rated among the 25
poorest countries in the world. According to El-Rufai (2011),
poverty has been in the country around fifty years ago when the
nation’s economic growth bypasses the poor and benefits a narrow
band of Nigerians.
Moreso, poverty has become a cancer that has eaten deeply
into all the sectors in the country and affected the efficiency of
these sectors be it educational, social, health or economic
sector. It has made it difficult for Nigerians to differentiate
between lawful and unlawful means of acquiring wealth. They are
unable to satisfy their basic needs of life because wealth is
concentrated in the hands of the minority.
Moreover, the standard of education is drastically low as a
result of poverty which hinders the good performances of the
students. According to Adebayo (2005), the nation’s educational
sector remains in a state of doldrums. Majority of the students
depend on machineries to pass their examinations as many schools
lack conducive academic environment for their students despite the
exorbitant fees they charge on each student which in most cases,
parents cannot afford. And in the case of the free education in
some states, classrooms are over crowded with pupils or students
5
which brings no fruit because such classrooms are usually
difficult to manage.
In addition, as a result of the high level of poverty in the
country, unemployment rate is increasing vastly which has given
rise to increase in armed robbery and kidnapping, which have
become a quick alternative way of alleviating poverty for robbers
and kidnappers who are unemployed and poor. A lot of people,
especially the youths, are engaging in money rituals using either
their parts of the body or others’ in order to relieve themselves
of the distress of poverty.
The social amenities in the society are outdated and risky.
Globally, Nigeria has been ranked third on the list of countries
that their citizens have inadequate water supply and sanitation
facility (Business Day, 2012). This made Igali, the Permanent
Secretary, Federal Ministry of Water Resources to lament thus:
Nigeria has obtained third position as one of theworld’s poorest countries in gaining access to water andsanitation… The challenge is critical as women andchildren trek long distances to fetch water from streamsand ponds which are most times contaminated.
Furthermore, the manifestation of poverty in Nigeria occurs
in various sectors such as health where many hospitals cannot
boast of adequate infrastructure and this has affected the
deliverance of adequate health services. This trend has also
manifested in the lives of many Nigerian graduates who are
aimlessly roaming the street with nothing to lay their hands upon
as only few of them are able to secure government jobs while the
majority are struggling to get private jobs.
The energy factor is nothing to write home about. Most
industries have closed down due to lack of adequate energy supply
while some have shifted their bases to other neighboring
6
countries. According to Ogunyiola (2011), only 10% of the rural
households and 40% of the country’s total population have access
to uninterrupted electricity. The trends have been statistically
reported by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) as cited by
Webby (2012) thus:
a. In 1980, 17.1 million people were in abject poverty
b. In 1985, 34.7 million people were in absolute poverty, i.e.
43%
c. In 1992, 39.2 million people were in abject poverty
d. In 1996, 67.1 million people were in absolute poverty
e. In 2004, 68.7 million people lived in absolute poverty
f. In 2010, 112.47 million people were victims of abject
poverty
In 2013, as claimed by Hamzah and Suraju (2013:4), the
percentage of people living in complete poverty have increased to
64% of neighbourhood due to the number of people that were
displaced by the 2012 flood disaster which affected 30 out of the
36 states in the country. This, perhaps, may continue to increase
if nothing is done to check it as reported by the BBC News (2012)
that the National Bureau of Statistics had predicted such.
To this end, the Nigerian government has tried to initiate
several policies, programmes and strategies targeted at
alleviating the problems of poverty but instead of ameliorating
the suffering of the masses, they rather aggravate the people’s
worries and sorrows.
Governmental Approach to Eradicating Poverty in Nigeria
Seeing the threat poverty has been posing on the standard of
living of Nigerians and political stability as well as economic
growth of the nation, Nigeria’s governments had been embarking on7
series of initiatives to combat poverty, the enemy of progress.
The war against poverty had started as far back as 1972 during the
regime of General Yakubu Gowon. He initiated the National
Accelerated Food Production Programme (NAFPP) and the Nigerian
Agricultural and Cooperative Bank (NACB) which he devoted to
agricultural services. However, these policies turned out to be an
elephant project. Thus, the struggle against poverty continues.
In 1976, the then military government headed by General
Olusegun Obasanjo came out with another policy tagged Operation
Feed the Nation (OFN) which was publicised among the rural
farmers. The policy was financed with huge amount of money and
effort so as to get the rural farmers educated on farming skills.
According to Chinedu and Ogwu (2008), the success of this
programme was only in creating awareness of food shortage and the
need to tackle the problem.
Another programme was put in place after the failure of
Operation Feed the Nation (OFN) by Alhaji Shehu Shagari in 1979.
Shehu Shagari’s Green Revolution Programme was charged with the
duties of reducing food importation and increasing local food
production. However, the programme ended up in wasting two billion
naira tax payers’ money in 1983 (Chinedu and Ogwu, 2008).
Besides, during his reign in 1984, General Muhammad Bukhari
initiated another policy of Go Back to Land with variations in
different states of the country in order to suit their needs.
Although the programme recorded some achievement, it did not last
long due to government overthrow by the military coup (Salisu,
2011).
In 1986, General Ibrahim Babangida introduced a programme
tagged the Directorate of Food, Roads and Rural Infrastructure
(DFRRI) which was meant to provide good roads, electricity,8
drinkable water and toilet facilities for those living in the
rural areas. This programme could not achieve its aims and
objectives due to the lack of effective standard for project co-
ordination and harmonization between the policy, i.e., DFRRI, and
the government (Ekong, 1997:558-559). General Babangida also
established the National Directorate for Employment (NDE) to
create employment opportunities for the youths. This NDE
programme, according to Lewu (n.d), had four main programmes:
Vocational Skills Development, Special Public Workers, Small Scale
Enterprises and Agriculture. He also established financial
institutions like People’s Bank of Nigeria (PBN) and Community
Bank, but both did not live to their expectations. Likewise, his
wife, Mariam Babangida, organised Better Life Programme for the
rural women which later became a programme for the rich women
while the rural women were dying of hunger, thirst, child labour,
diseases and so on.
Furthermore, in 1993, the Family Support Programme (FSP) and
the Family Economic Advancement Programme (FEAP) were set up by
the then Military President, General Sani Abacha and his wife, who
took the country as a means of acquiring wealth for their family.
It was reported by Tell Magazine (1998) as quoted by Chinedu and
Ogwu (2008) thus:
FSP gulped over N10 billion of tax payers’ money at atime her husband, Abacha, was retrenching happilesscivil servants nationwide.
All the aforementioned programmes were established during the
period of military governments in Nigeria before the inception of
civilian governments.
In the democratic era of President Olusegun Obasanjo, some
programmes were also introduced to combat poverty that is
9
dehumanizing the citizens. Some of these programmes include
Poverty Alleviation Programme (PAP) in the year 2000 and National
Poverty Eradication Programme (NAPEP) in the year 2001 which was
used to replace PAP when it failed to improve rural
electrification and water supply as well as creating job
opportunities. Also, Universal Basic Education (UBE) and National
Economic Empowerment Development Strategy (NEEDS) were
established.
The efforts did not stop with the government alone. The non-
governmental organizations also contributed their own quota in
reducing poverty in the country by establishing different
programmes in different states of the nation which include the
Grassroots Empowerment Network (GEN), the Life Above Poverty
(LAPO), Health System Development Fund (HSDF), Country Women
Association of Nigeria (COWAN), The Transparency in Nigeria (TIN)
and so on (Atanda, 2009 and Adebayo, 2005).
Despite all these fascinating but money-consuming policies,
Nigerians are still wallowing in unstable electricity, undrinkable
water supply, uncirculated health care services and education,
income inequality, political instability, bad roads, etc., which
have caused and brought unpalatable effects on both individuals
and the society at large.
10
Effects of Poverty on Nigeria
i. Poverty has led many Nigerians to commit infanticide and
abortion even though they know their illegality but they have
been forced to perpetrate these evils as a result of poverty.
ii. Insecurity is the order of the day in Nigeria. Innocent
people are being killed in the nooks and crannies of the
country. Series of kidnapping have been reported with huge
amount of money demanded as ransom.
iii. Poverty has promoted violent unionism, industrial
strikes, hooliganism, robbery and house-breaking.
iv. Poverty has led many Nigerians, especially the youths
into money rituals through which many citizens have been
reported missing and if eventually found, they are either
dead or useless for themselves, their families and the
society.
v. Due to extreme poverty, bribery and corruption has become the
order of the day to majority of the citizens.
vi. Prostitution, on the part of the female youths, has
become a means of accumulating wealth from the minority who
are controlling the nation’s wealth and resources.
It should be noted here that, the poverty victims do the
above mentioned points to relieve themselves of the distress and
humiliation of this endemic malady. Hence, it is high time Nigeria
implemented the right measure of bridging the gap between the rich
and the poor in order to allow the circulation of wealth in the
society.
Islamic Approach to Poverty Alleviation
In Islam, it is believed that Allah has not created man to
live in absolute poverty. He does not recognise poverty and
11
suffering as well as laziness as confirmed by the following
Quranic verses:
He it is Who made the earth subservient to you; so walk inthe paths thereof and eat of His provision. And to Himwill be Resurrection (Q67:15).
Also in Q2:268, Allah confirms this as He says:
Satan threatens you with the prospect of poverty and bidsyou to be niggardly whereas God promises you Hisforgiveness and bounty; and God is infinite, all-knowing.From the above quoted verses, it can be deduced that Islam does
not condone poverty and laziness as they are from Shaitān as
promised and Allah has warned the believers not to give in to its
temptation by avoiding his paths and taking him as manifest enemy.
The Qur’ān says:
O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and good on theearth, and follow not the footsteps of Shaitān. Verily, heis to you an open enemy. Q 2:168.The above verse is a clear proof that Islam encourages and
commands man to find a lawful means of avoiding poverty and
insufficiency as well as commanding him not to trek the paths of
evil in alleviating or eradicating poverty which are done through
unlawful sources of earning like bribery and corruption, robbery,
cheating, looting, prostitution, rituals, embezzling public funds
and so on. This can further be strengthened by the prayer of the
Prophet (S.A.W) against poverty when he said:
O Allah! I seek your protection from infidelity andpoverty (Abu Dawud, and Vol.4/324).
In another narration, it reads thus:O Allah! I seek Your protection from poverty,insufficiency and debasement (Abu Dawud, vol. 2/91).Moreso, it is an indisputable fact that man is not equal
physically and economically as planned by Allah. By this, the
strong has been commanded to cater for the weak and the rich to
12
show mercy on the poor. In order to realize this, Islam has laid
down some measures through which the weak, handicapped and the
poor can be assisted in lawful and honourable ways. These measures
include the institution of Baitu’l-Māl (Public Treasury), Kharāj (Land
Tax), Jizyah (Poll Tax), Sadaqah (Voluntary Charity). However, the
focus of this paper is on the institution of Zakāh as a mechanism
for dealing with poverty as a catastrophe.
Zakāh as a Panacea for Poverty in Nigeria
Zakāh as an institution is legalised in Islam for the purpose
of taking care of the less-privileged ones who cannot afford their
basic needs. It is a means of decentralising the wealth and
resources of the country. By this, the wealth and resources are
circulated to the nooks and crannies of the nation justly. Through
the institution of Zakāh, the security of a nation and individual
as well as resources or properties can be developed and sustained.
Thus, Zakāh, according to Al-Azhariy as quoted by Qardawi (1994:
1/38):
purifies and cleanses the soul of the poor as well asincreasing him in provision and sustenance… Zakāh notonly purifies the property of the contributor but alsopurifies his heart from selfishness and greed. It alsopurifies the heart of the recipient from envy andjealousy as well as hatred to the contributor.From the above quotation, it can be inferred that Zakāh can
be a means to put an end to insecurity of lives and properties
which are caused by poverty due to the selfishness, greed and
miserliness of the rich people towards the poor. Thus, the
institution of Zakāh can be used as a solution to these ludicrous
attitudes if collected from the right personalities and
distributed to the rightful beneficiaries who have been mentioned
in the Glorious Qur’ān thus:
13
Alms are for the poor and the needy and those employed toadminister the funds and for those whose hearts have been(recently) reconciled (to truth); for those in bondage andin debt; in the cause of Allah; and for the wayfarerordained by Allah. And Allah is full of knowledge andwisdom (Q9:60).Moreover, the sole aims of this institution in Islam is to
promote standard welfare in the society, to reduce if not
eliminate the suffering of the masses, to fix love and cooperation
among the people, to reduce or eliminate tyranny, hatred, poverty
and crimes as well as ignorance by providing necessary facilities
that will assist in achieving these aims (Siddique, 2008: 137).
The Prophet has been reported to have said on the authority of Ali
that:
Allah has enjoined upon rich Muslims a due to be takenfrom their properties corresponding to the needs of thepoor among them. The poor will never suffer fromstarvation or lack of clothes unless the rich neglecttheir due. If they do so, Allah will surely hold themaccountable and punish them severely (Recorded byTabrani), quoted from (Sambo and Hijab 1998:97).It can be concluded based on the above quoted Hadith that the
poor and the needy will not be dehumanized by poverty in a society
if the institution of Zakāh is established and grounded.
Similarly, it will provide job opportunities for both the weak and
the strong in the society, thereby ameliorating people’s condition
of hardship occasioned by poverty.
Collection and Distribution of Zakāh
The collection and distribution of Zakāh can be done through
the following means based on the content of Q9:103 which reads:
“Take alms of their wealth and make them pure and clean…”. This is
also based on the practice of Prophet Muhammad, his Companions and
14
the explanation of the Muslim Scholars. Thus, it can be done by
either of the following:
a. The Islamic State: This is a state that is governed by the
rules and regulations of Islam in line with the Qur’ān,
Sunnah and the consensus of the Muslim Scholars. It is the
responsibility of this state to collect and distribute the
Zakāh by the order of the Imām, i.e., the leader of the state
or his deputy (Al-‘Uthaymin, 2007:3/9). This is why the
Prophet, as the head of the state, said:
Surely, Allah has ordained on them sadaqah (i.e.,Zakāh) to be taken from the rich and distributed tothe poor (Bukhari, Hadith no 1548).
This, according to Shacarāwī (2009: 203), is the best because
it saves the recipient from being humiliated or disgraced if it is
to be taken or collected individually from the rich. However, in
the absence of an Islamic state then the Islamic scholars are
charged with those responsibilities.
b. The Islamic Scholars: The Islamic Scholars are the heirs of
Prophet. Thus, it is incumbent on them to find a way of
collecting and distributing Zakāh in their locality just as
they struggle to build mosques in every locality for Salāh
(prayer) in a secular environment. The Islamic scholars
should form a body of trustees or Muslim Councils of Affairs
as it is done in Ghana (Shaanin Zongo, 2011). The membership
should be based on the following qualities:
Sincerity Honesty Knowledge Dedication and DevotionThis responsibility on the Islamic scholars calls for the
coalition of the Muslim organizations so as to make it a reality.
15
However, it becomes the duty of individual rich Muslims to
deducted their Zakāh by themselves and distribute it in the absence
of this body of trustees.
(c) Individual Distribution: This is allowed in the absence of
the first two categories mentioned above. However, it will
not bring out the aims and objectives of the institution of
Zakāh in the society. It also shows the degeneration of the
concept and practice of Islamic Baitu’l-Māl as well as the
decline in the practice of Islamic Law (Rahmatullah, 2010).
It should, however, be noted that collection of Zakāh is not
only from money but also from gold, silver, copper, livestock,
farm produce, merchandise for business, shares and bonds, rented
houses and shops and so on (Oloso, 2008: 123-127). All these
assets of Zakāh are expected to reach a certain limit technically
known as Nisāb which differs based on the various assets. The nisāb
is to be owned continuously for a period of one lunar year from
which the payable amount of Zakāh (i.e., 2.5% if it is money, gold
or silver) is deducted and disbursed to the rightful
beneficiaries. And in the case of farm produce that has reached
nisāb (i.e., 5 awsuq), 5% will be given out if it is an irrigated
land and 10% of the land or farm is watered by rain (Ismacil,
1997:1/482). On the cows that have reached thirty in number, the
Zakāh is a year old calf and in every forty cows, a two-year old
calf will be taken as Zakāh.
The Zakāh to be given on sheep or goats is a sheep or goat if
it is between 40 and 120 sheep. And when it reaches 200 sheep, the
Zakāh is 2 sheep. Then, in every additional hundred of sheep or
goats there is one additional sheep to the Zakāh while the Zakāh
of a camel is presented below in a tabular form as explained by
Hallaq (2007: 602-606) and Al-Qardawi (1994): 16
Livestock
Range ofthe Nisābin number
Rate of Zakāh
Camel 5-9 I sheep/Goat.10-14 2 sheep/ Goats.15-19 3 sheep/Goats.20-24 4 sheep/Goats.25-35 A year old she-camel that the mother is pregnant
(Bint Makhād).36-45 A two year old she-camel that the mother is
milky (Bint Labūn).46-60 A three year old she—camel that can carry load
and be ridden (Hiqqah).61-75 A four year old-she-camel that is going to five
years (Jadhacah).76-90 2, two year old she-camel that the mother is
milky (Bintā Labūn)91-120 2, three-year old she-camel that can carry load
(Hiqqatān).121 and above
In every 40 camels, a two year old she-camel andevery 50 camel a three year old she-camel.
It can be deduced from the above table that the animal to be
given out as Zakāh is the female species so as to reproduce for
the recipient who, by this, can also posses numbers of cattle.
Thus, self-dependence, sufficiency and development will be
promoted and enhanced (Hamzah and Suraju, 2013:10).
Zakāh Distribution Scheme
The Qur’ān has laid down eight (8) categories of people that
benefit from the institution of Zakāh in other of preference
according to Q9:60. This, along with the explanation of the
Islamic scholars, forms the basis for Zakāh Distribution Scheme.
These beneficiaries of Zakāh are:
i. Al-Fuqarā’ – The poorii. Al-Masākīn – The Needyiii. Al-cāmilīna calayhā – The Collectors and Distributors iv. Al-Mu’allafatu Qulūbuhum – Those whose hearts are made to
embrace Islam.
17
v. Fi-r-Riqāb – Emancipating the slavesvi. Al-Ghārimīn – The Debtorsvii. Fis-Sabīlillahi – In the cause of Allahviii. Ibnu-s-Sabīl – The Wayfarer
On the above list of beneficiaries, the Islamic scholars have
explained how Zakāh can be distributed in a way that the aims and
objectives will be utmostly and justly achieved.
With regards to Fuqarā’ and Masākīn, the majority of Islamic
scholars, which include Imām Mālik, Shāfici and Hambali, defined
Faqīr (the singular of Fuqarā’) as the one who has no wealth or
income for himself and his dependents (Az-Zuhayli; 2007: 3/296).
According to Ismacil (1998: 1/496), a Faqīr is a person that has
nothing to eat from a day or a year. While a Miskīn is the one who
has wealth and income but not sufficient enough for his life and
dependants (Al-cUthaymin, 2007:68). In the opinion of Hanafi School
of thought (Al-Kāsānī, 1989:2/125) both Faqīr and Miskīn are
similar in meaning and condition with peculiarities.
Undoubtedly, it is these two categories that are being used
in the society as the agents of insecurity and violence. This is
because a hungry man is an angry man. Hence, Zakāh can be given to
prevent the people in these categories from creating incongenial
atmosphere for others. By this, they need to be given continuously
till they meet their basic needs or assist them in buying tools
and instruments for their vocational skills so as to be self-
employed.
More so, the institution of Zakāh can be used to create job
opportunities for the jobless Nigerians in different locations
under the third category of zakāh beneficiaries. This, in Quranic
usage, is called al-cāmilīna calaihā – The Zakāh workers – which are
divided into two units; Collectors unit and Distributors Unit.
18
According to Qardāwī (1994), these two groups receive Zakāh not
because of their need, but for the services they render to both
the institution and the society (Az-Zuhayli, 2007: 3/298).
Furthermore, this institution can be used to stop people,
with bad intentions against Islam and the Muslims, from executing
their evil thoughts. This category of people, according to Az-
Zuhayli (2007), includes both the Muslims who are weak in faith
and the non-Muslims whom their goodness or wellbeing is expected
for the community or their evils are being afraid of.
In addition, the proceeds of Zakāh can be given to those in
captivity so as to liberate them since slavery is against the
nature of humanity. However, the absence of slavery in the
contemporary world makes some Islamic scholars to conclude that
these Zakāh proceeds should be allocated to the Muslim prisoners
of war who have been enslaved under the disbelievers’ government
(Al-Qardawī, 1994) or those who have been jailed because of their
inability to pay their fines (Saminu, 2012:46).
Moreover, the institution of Zakāh will also serve as a
relief for Nigerians who are in debt which are incurred with
acceptable and genuine reasons under Sharī‘ah. According to Ismacil
(1997: 1/500), the debt should be incurred for a recommended act
and not to commit sins such as drinking alcohol, smoking cigarette
or India hems and so on. In his own submission, Saminu (2012: 46)
gives some other provisions, for using Zakāh proceeds to pay off
the debt of the debtors, thus:
i. If the debtor is liable to be imprisoned for not repaying
his debt.
ii. If the debt is to achieve social reform such as the money
paid as blood money (ad-Diyah) or compensation for damages
19
shouldered by a person to bring reconciliation between two
or more people.
iii. If it is a debt incurred by guaranteeing the repayment of
another person’s debt.
Under the seventh category, the proceeds of zakāh can be used
to cater for the social amenities of the masses such as
construction of good roads, building of hospitals, schools and
mosques, even though it is the opinion of the minority (Ismacil:
1997:1/501 and Oloso, 2008:128). According to Al-Qaradawi (n.d.
61-70), the phrase “fi sabīli-’l-llahi” which means Jihad as agreed upon by
the four schools of thought is a wide term that may be
educational, social, economic, political and journalistic. Thus,
Zakāh can be spent for the well being of the people in a society,
especially in the absence of physical war. In his opinion, al-cUthaymin (2007:69) postulates that it can be given to the students
of Islamic knowledge to buy books, clothes and pay school fees and
so on.
The institution of Zakāh can also be used to meet the need of
a traveller who needs money to complete his journey or return him
to his destination. However, some conditions have been laid down
by the Islamic scholar before giving Zakāh to a wayfarer. These
include:
a. The journey should not be in the disobedience of Allah
(Ismacil: 1997:1/501)
b. If the traveller becomes poor on his journey (Oloso,
2008:128)
c. If there is nobody to borrow him money at the period.
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that, the
institution of Zakāh is capable of taming Nigerians’ poverty if
20
judiciously implemented. Some countries of the world like Saudi
Arabia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Qatar, and so on have always practiced
this. Thus, Nigeria can borrow a leaf from these countries in
order to sustain her economy. By implementing the institution of
Zakāh, wealth and resources will flow from higher concentration to
lower concentration. It will also save the lower class citizen
from the injustice of paying tax from their insufficient salaries
and not enjoining any social amenities or welfarism from the tax
collectors.
21
Conclusion
It has been established from the discussion so far that
majority of the Nigerians are wallowing in absolute poverty since
independence as a result of the concentration of wealth and
resources in the hands of the minority in the country.
Furthermore, the paper has examined the efforts of the government
in combating poverty which have not yielded any fruitful result
other than embezzlement of funds. The institution of Zakāh has
been presented and suggested as a divine panacea to this endemic
malady. The ways to or of what? and those that can benefit from
the scheme have equally been extensively discussed.
It is against the above that this paper is recommending that
the government should constitute a committee which should comprise
the Islamic scholars, representatives from farmers and bankers
association as well as businessmen at the three levels of
government, i.e., Federal, state and local levels. The committee
should be saddled with the responsibility of deciding the kinds of
people to be in each category of the beneficiaries of Zakāh. For
instance, the first category which is al-Fuqarā’ – the poor- may
include the orphans, widows, old age both man and woman, those
affected with any disaster, especially fire or water and so on
while the second category may include sick person in the hospital
who needs to settle their hospital bills and the like. This
spelling out of those that fall under each category will assist
the smooth distribution of the Zakāh without any form of
injustice.
The committee should think of empowerment scheme for those
beneficiaries that have acquired some vocational skills by
assisting them in getting machines or instruments of their skills
so as to be self independent and free from collecting Zakāh in the22
subsequent years. It should also think of organizing seminars,
workshops and trainings to cater for and empower those that have
no vocational skills so as to relieve them of dependence on
others.
With the above scheme, we hope the suffering of the masses
will be ameliorated and there will be both individual and national
development.
23
ReferencesAbdalati, H. (1996). Islam in Focus. USA: American Trust Publication.Abu Dawud, S. (n.d.) Sunan Abī Dāwud. (n.p.): Dāru ‘l-FikrAbu Salman, D. (2013). “Zakat: Charity Required for Personal Salvation and
Muslim Revival”.http://abussalmandiyauddeenberle.wordpress.com/. Accessedon 7th April, 2013.
Adebayo, R.I. (2005). “Poverty Alleviation Strategies in Nigeria: A Lesson from theInstitution of Zakāt”. Being a paper presented at a NationalWorkshop on Islamic Political Thought and Institution atBayero University between 24th and 26th August, 2005.
Adibe, J. (2012). “Poverty Alleviation in Nigeria: which way Nigeria?.http://www.holler africa.com/showarticle.php?artId=268&catId=1&page=1 . Accessed on 21st November, 2012.
Ali, H. (2011). “Nigerian States and their National Resources”http://www.nairaland. com /724526. Retrieved on 5th
December, 2012Al-Bukhari, M. I. (n.d). Sahih al-Bukhari. Beirut: Daru’l-Jil.Al-Kasani, A. M. (1989). Badā’icu-s-sanā’ici.Al-Maududi, A. (1985). Let us be Muslims. United Kingdom: Islamic
Foundation.Al-Qardawi, Y. (1994). Fiqh al-zakāh. Vol. 1 (11) Cairo: Maktabah
Wahbah.Al-cUthaymīn, M.S (2007). Sharhu Bulūghi’l-Marām min ‘adillati’l ahkām. Vol
iii (vi). Beirut: Dāru’l-Kutubi’ l-cIlmiyyah.Al-cUthaymin, M. S. (2007). Al-Majmūcu’l-Fiqhī-th-thamīn Cairo:
Mu’assasatu’l-Mukhtār.Ash-Shacrāwī, M. M. (2009). Al-Fatāwa. Cairo: Dāru-t-Tawfiqiyyah li-t-
Turāth.Atanda, Y.F. (2009). “Zakāt as a Means of Eradicating Poverty in Our Society: A
Case Study of Ilorin Metropolis”. Being an unpublished Long Essaysubmitted to the Department of Islamic Studies, Al-HikmahUniversity, Ilorin.
Az-Zuhayli, W. (2007). Al-Fiqhu’l-Islāmī wa ’adillatuhu. Damascus: Dāru’l-Fikr
BBC News. (2012). “Nigerians Living in Poverty Rise to Nearly 61%”http://m.bbc.co.uk/ news/world_africa_17015873. Retrievedon 10th December, 2012.
Boomie, O. (2002). “Motherland Nigeria: Agriculture and Animals”.http://www.mother landnigeria.com/agriculture.html/.Retrieved on 5th December, 2012
Business Day Newspaper (2012). “Nigeria Ranks 3rd Globally in Poor WaterSanitation Access”.http://www.businessdayonline.com/NF/index.php/news/latest/37510_nigeira_ranks_3rd_globally_in_poor_water_sanitation_access. Accessed on 3rd May, 2013.
Chinedu, L. and Ogwu, A. (2008). “Poverty Relief: More programs, more pains”.http://nigeriaworld.com/articles/2008/feb/083.html.Accessed on 11th December, 2012.
Cowan, J.M. (1974). A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic. Beirut andLondon: Librairie Duliban MacDonald and Evan Ltd.
Ekong, C.N. (1997). Framework for Building a Sustainable Poverty AlleviationStrategies. Nigerian Economic Society (NES).
El-Rufai, (2011). “Nigeria: Rich Country, Poor People” in This Day Live.http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/nigeria_rich_country_poor_peoplle/96703. Retrieved on 6th December, 2012.
Hallaq, M.S.H (2007). Fiqh According to Qur’ān and Sunnah. Vol.1 (II).Riyadh: Darussalam.
Hamzah, A. and Suraju, S.B (2013). “Taming Poverty: Language, Zakāt andNational Development”. Being a paper presented at the 1st
Humanities Conference of the College of the Humanities, Al-Hikmah University, Ilorin between May 12th and 15th 2013.
Ismacil, M. B. (1997). Al-Fiqhu’l-Wādih mina’l-kitāb was-Sunnah calā’l-Madhāhibi’l-Arbacah. Vol. 1(iii). Cairo: Dāru’l-Manār.
Lewu, M.A.Y (n.d). “A Critical Appraisal of Poverty Alleviation Programmes inNigeria” in Babatolu, J.S and Gbad, Ikuejube (ed.),Perspectives on Contemporary Socio-Political andEnvironmental Issues in Nigeria. Ondo: School of Arts andSocial Sciences, Adeyemi College of Education.
Ogunyiola, S. (2011). Energy Crisis in Nigeria.http://perpetualminds.com/. Retrieved on 21st November,2012.
Oloso, K.K. (2008). “Zakat as a Prime Poverty Alleviator” in Zakariyau Oseni(ed.) Fluorescence of Arabic and Islamic Studies in
Nigeria: Festerift in Honour of Professor Wahab O.A. Nairu.Ibadan: FEBN Publishers Plc.
Popoola, L. and Olaniyan, O. (Eds). (2010) 50 years of Nationhood:Experiences in and prospects for sustainable Development inNigeria – Introduction and Overview. Ibadan: University ofIbadan Center for Sustainable Development.
Rahmatullahi, (2010). “Zakat Distribution System, must be reformed”.http://twocircles.net/2010aug/zakat_distribution_system_must_be_reformed_dr_rahmatullahi.html. Accessed on 3rd May, 2013.
Salisu, S. (2011). “Why Poverty Remains High”.http://www.nigeriaintel.com/0211/11/12/why_poverty_emains_high/. Accessed on 10th March,2014.
Sambo, B. and Hijab, M. (1998). Islamic Studies for Junior Secondary School.Lagos: Islamic Publication Bureau.
Saminu, I. (2012). Zakah Collection and Distribution: A Case Study ofZamfara State Collection, Distribution and Endowment Board.Being a Long Essay Submitted to the Department of IslamicStudies, Al-Hikmah University Ilorin.