Top Banner
C ree k D i tc h St Louis Crossing Old Saint Louis C r e e k E a s t Rugby Nortonburg W h i t e R i v e r Bethany F o r k Petersville Newbern Burnsville Grammer Azalia Waynesville R i v e r B r a n c h C r e e k B ran ch Cr e e k C r e e k B r a n c h C l if t y F a ll F o rk C re ek R i ve r £ ¤ 31 Cli f ty Cr eek M ud C r ee k Cl i f t y Cr e ek S i d n e y C at h eri ne Cree k Lick Creek D eni o s E a s t W olf A r m u t h Mount Healthy Waymansville B e ar C r e ek F l a t r o c k Ri ve r S a n d Bra n c h D uc k C reek W o lf C r e e k C o o k s Fo r k T h o m p s o n S l o u g h Prince W hite Cre e k W h ite C r ee k § ¨ ¦ 65 Nineveh H aw Cr eek L i t t l e S an d Cree k ¬ « 46 ¬ « 58 Creek B i g S l o u g h Buck Fis h er s H o rse Sloan S las h - L o e s c h D i t c h S a ddl e Cr e ek B uc k B r an c h M u dd y L i t t l e S a n d C r e e k T o ug h C r e ek D r i f t w oo d Cha m b e rs D itc h Grandview Lake Schaefer Lake Wood Lake Lutheran Lake F o r k W h i t e Tamerix Lake Lake Barbara Youth Camp Lake Harrison Lake Suhre Lake Fraternal Order Columbus Police Lake Lawsons Lake Echo Lake Twin Lakes C re e k Ogilville Garden City Taylorsville Walesboro F o r k ¬ « 11 White E a s t ¬ « 9 ¬ « 46 § ¨ ¦ 65 £ ¤ 31 £ ¤ 31 ¬ « 58 ¬ « 9 ¬ « 46 ¬ « 11 ¬ « 46 ¬ « 7 Elizabethtown Clifford Hartsville Hope Edinburgh Jonesville Columbus Columbus Camp Atterbury Grouse Ridge Public Fishing Area Driftwood Fishing Area Creek Creek Atterbury Fish and Wildlife Area S a n d C r e e k Br u s h C re e k § ¨ ¦ 65 Map Use and Disclaimer Statement Location Map Potentiometric Surface Map of the Unconsolidated Aquifers of Bartholomew County, Indiana ® Digital Elevation Model of Bartholomew County, Indiana Elevation (feet) 1017 518 § ¨ ¦ 65 £ ¤ 31 ¬ « 46 EXPLANATION 670
1

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE …6 4 0 6 5 0 5 7 0 640 6 1 0 5 8 0 5 7 0 6 6 0 65 0 7 0 0 6 6 0 65 0 5 8 0 6 9 0 670 650 6 2 0 C ree k 6 0 0 D i t c h 6 8 0 6 6 0 6 9 0 6 0 0 6

Jul 06, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE …6 4 0 6 5 0 5 7 0 640 6 1 0 5 8 0 5 7 0 6 6 0 65 0 7 0 0 6 6 0 65 0 5 8 0 6 9 0 670 650 6 2 0 C ree k 6 0 0 D i t c h 6 8 0 6 6 0 6 9 0 6 0 0 6

640

650

570

640

610

580

570

660

650

700

660

650

580

690

670

650

620

Creek

600

Ditch

680660

690

600

670

630

640

660640

610

680

670660

610600

570 590

St LouisCrossing

Old SaintLouis

Creek

East

600

610590

640

610

640650

660650

640

670

640

610

600

590

580

Rugby

Nortonburg

600

580

570

580

630

590

610

610

640

620

620

620

600

680670

660

650

640

WhiteRive r

630

650

640

620

600

650

630

620

610

640

640

630

660

650

660

640

620

Bethany Fork

630

620

600

590

630

630

630 620

6

6

1

34

1

2 1

7

1

Petersville

Newbern

Burnsville

2

6

2

3

7

1

3

5

4

1

1

7

6

1

5

6

54

5

9

23

4

2

4

8

1

7

3

5

245

4

4

3

5

9

9

5

3

3

7

5

4

1

2

7

2

8

9

4

9

9

5

3

8

2

3

8

2

8

9

8

1

3

9

3

8

2

2

3

2

6

8

4

6

1

8

8

6

9

5

9

2

9

7

3

1

2

6

7

1

3

6

7

1

8

7

6

7

12

13 18

11

12

18

13

11

30

12

11

32

13

18

11

33

23

17

12

11

31

28

24

11

33

19

22

24

25

34

11

16

16

28

24

11

21

26

10

15 13

25

34

1210

12

11

21

11

34

15

16

20

29

29

16

33

27

35

22

16

28

19

15

25

10

11

11

25

32

17

31

20

13

31

15

22

17

21

24

11

13

25

12

27

14

10

21

26

21

14

36

20

13

36

19

22

24

12

27

18

25

17

28

16

32

20

34

36

36

32

29

10

30

13

13

22

27

31

23

27

22

15

30

13

31

17

27

36

26

15

36

33

16

33

35

35

23

15

30

21

10

22

14

13

29

18

11

29

35

14

35

30

28

32

12

28

28

26

34

32

27

12

35

24

36

15

12

24

34

31

35

15

24

27

33

30

33

23

32

25

25

15

13

17

12

15

25

34

23

35

26

10

23

10

19

24

23

22

17

18

29

35

20

23

34

28

10

21

26

23

14

26

26

16

18

21

36

35

10

14

14

24

17

12

10

23

26

14

CR 525 E

CR 1025 E

CR 300 S

CR 60 E

CR 1125 E

CR 100 N

Base Line Rd

Grammer

Azalia

Waynesville

CR 1025 E

CR 400 S

CR 750 E

CR 1050 E

CR 800 S

CR 300 E

34

14

19

13

14

10

14

22

17

36

3634

20

32

29

23

26

25

10

14

22

15

33

20

18

19

14

1716

27

16

30

27

15

34

12

26

14

22

29

20

35

31

27

10

19

1817

15

24

13

36

25

18

19

30

31

18 16

10

1112

15

Rive r

B ranc

h

Creek

CR 950 N

CR 550 W

Branch Creek

CR 700 N

650

630

Cree k

Branch Cl ifty

FallF

ork

Creek

River

£¤31

CliftyCreek

MudCre

ek

Clifty

Creek

S idney

Catherine Creek

Lick Creek

Denios

East

WolfAr

muth

MountHealthy

WaymansvilleBe

arCr

eek

Flatr

ockRiv

er

Sand Branch

Duck

Creek

Wolf Creek

Cooks

Fork

ThompsonSlough

Prince

White Creek

White Creek

§̈¦65

Nineveh

HawCr

eek

Little

Sand Creek

¬«46

¬«58

Creek

BigSlo

ugh

Buck

Fisher

s

Horse

Sloan

Slash

-Lo e

s chDi

tch

Saddle Creek

Buck Branch

Muddy

Little

Sand

Creek

To ugh Creek

Driftwood

ChambersDitch

GrandviewLake

SchaeferLake

WoodLake

LutheranLake

ForkWhite

TamerixLake

LakeBarbara

YouthCampLake

HarrisonLake

SuhreLake

CR 425 E

Fraternal OrderColumbus

Police Lake

LawsonsLake

EchoLake

TwinLakes

CR 200 E

CR 950 N

CR 900 N

Cre ek

CR 900 E

630

630

630

Ogilville

GardenCity

CR 650 E

CR 100 W

CR 1000 E

CR 700 S

CR 200 S

CR 550 N

CR 550 S

CR 200 S

CR 800 N

CR 350 E

CR 500 E

CR 350 E

CR 100 E

CR 200 W

610

620630

Taylorsville

CR 600 N

CR 750 S

CR 100 W

CR 600 E

CR 250 W

CR 500 N

CR 250 E

CR 25 E

CR 400 E

CR 75 S

CR 250 N

CR 700 S

CR 800 W

CR 700 N

CR 600 S

Youth Ca m p Rd

CR 50 W

CR 100 S

CR 700 N

CR 50 N

CR 650 S

CR 600 E

CR 400 N

CR 400 W

CR 450 N

CR 300 S

CR 750 W

Walesboro

Fork

580

CR 700 W

CR 425 E

CR 750 W

CR 500 W

CR 300 E

CR 350 W

CR 500 N

CR 850 W

CR 475 E

CR 850 S

¬«11

CR 500 S

CR 1000 E

CR 1100 E

White

East

CR 450 N

¬«9

¬«46

§̈¦65

£¤31

£¤31

¬«58

¬«9

¬«46

¬«11

¬«46

¬«7

Elizabethtown

Clifford

Hartsville

Hope

Edinburgh

Jonesville

Columbus

Columbus

CampAtterbury

GrouseRidge PublicFishing Area

DriftwoodFishing

Area

R. 5 E. R. 6 E.

R. 6 E. R. 7 E.

R. 7 E. R. 8 E.

T. 11 N.T. 10 N.

T. 10 N.T. 9 N.

R. 6 E. R. 7 E.

R. 4 E. R. 5 E.

T. 9 N.T. 8 N.

T. 8 N.T. 7 N.

T. 8 N. T. 7 N.

T. 9 N.T. 8 N.

T. 10 N.T. 9 N.

R. 4 E. R. 5 E.

R. 5 E. R. 6 E.

R. 7 E. R. 8 E.T. 11 N.T. 10 N.

Creek

Creek

Atterbury Fishand

WildlifeArea

Sand Cre ek

Brush

Creek

§̈¦65

POT ENT IOMET RIC SU RFACE MAP OF T HE U NCONSOL IDAT EDAQU IFERS OF BART HOL OMEW COU NT Y, INDIANA

Micha el R. Penc e, Go vernorDep artm ent o f Natura l Resourc esCa m ero n F. Clark, DirectorDivisio n o f Water Potentio m etric Surfa c e Ma p 48-A

Ma p generated by Reub en Q. ArvinIDNR, Divisio n o f Water, Reso urc e Assessm ent Sectio n

We request that the fo llo wing a genc y b e a c kno wled ged in pro d ucts d erived fro m this m a p : Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f Natura l Reso urc es, Divisio n o f Water.T his m a p was c o m p iled by sta ff o f the Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f Natura l Resourc es, Divisio n o f Water using d ata b elieved to be reaso na b ly a c curate. Ho wever, a d egree o f error is inherent in a ll m a p s. T his pro d uct is d istributed “as is” witho ut warra nties o f a ny kind , either expressed o r im p lied . T his m a p is intend ed fo r use o nly at the published sc a le.

Map Use and Disclaimer Statement T his m a p is created fro m severa l existing sha p efiles. T o wnship a nd Ra nge L ines o f Ind ia na (line sha p efile, 20020621), L a nd Survey L ines o f Ind ia na (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20020621), a nd County Bound aries o f Ind ia na (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20020621), are fro m the Ind ia na Geo lo gic a l Survey a nd b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. Ro a d s (T IGER a nd INDOT ) (line sha p efile, 2005) is fro m the Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f T ra nsp o rtatio n a nd b ased o n a 1:100,000 sc a le. Inc o rp o rated Bo und aries in Ind ia na (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20060501) is fro m the Gra p hics a nd Engineering Sectio n, Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f T ra nsp o rtatio n. Hydro gra p hy, Strea m s (NHD) (line sha p efile, 20081218), Rivers (NHD) (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20081218), a nd L a kes (NHD) (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20081218) are fro m the U .S. Geo lo gic a l Survey a nd b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. Ma na ged L a nd s IDNR IN (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20100920) is fro m the Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f Natura l Resourc es a nd b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. Digita l Elevatio n Mo d el im a ge is d erived fro m the Ind ia na Ortho/L iDAR Statewid e Co llectio n Pro gra m (2011). Bartho lo m ew County U nc o nso lid ated No Aquifer Materia l o r L im ited Data (p o lygo n sha p efile, Korinek, 2014; Revised 2019, Resourc e Assessm ent) a nd Po tentio m etric Surfa c e Co nto urs o f the U nc o nso lid atedAquifers o f Bartho lo m ew County, Ind ia na (line sha p efile, Korinek, 2014; Revised 2019,Reso urc e Assessm ent) are b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le.

Location Map

Potentiometric Surface Map of the Unconsolidated Aquifersof Bartholomew County, Indiana

b yGinger C. Korinek

Divisio n o f Water, Resourc e Assessm ent Sectio nDec em b er 2014

Bartho lo m ew County, Ind ia na is lo c ated in south-c entra l Ind ia na b o und ed by Bro wn, Jo hnso n, Shelby, Dec atur, Jennings, a nd Ja c kso n c o unties to the west, no rthwest, no rth, east, southeast, a nd south, resp ec tively. T he c o unty is situated c o m p letely within the East Fork White River Basin.T he Potentio m etric Surfa c e Ma p (PSM) o f the unc o nso lid ated aquifers o f Bartho lo m ew Co unty is m a p p ed by c o ntouring the elevatio ns o f 779 static water levels rep o rted o n well rec o rds rec eived prim arily o ver a 50-year p erio d . T hese wells are c o m p leted in unc o nso lid ated aquifers at vario us d ep ths a nd typ ic a lly und er c o nfined c o nd itio ns (b o und ed by im p erm ea b le la yers a b o ve a nd b elo w the water bearing fo rm atio n). Ho wever, so m e wells are c o m p leted in unc o nfined settings with water bearing fo rm atio ns not b o und ed by im p erm ea b le la yers. T he p o tentio m etric surfa c e is a m easure o f the pressure o n water in a water bearing fo rm atio n, o r aquifer. Water in a n unc o nfined aquifer is at atm o sp heric pressure a nd will no t rise in a well a b o ve the to p o f the water bearing form atio n. In c o ntrast, water in a c o nfined aquifer, whic h is und er hydro static pressure, will rise in a well a b o ve the to p o f the water bearing fo rm atio n. Static water level m easurem ents in ind ivid ua l wells used to c o nstruct c o unty p o tentio m etric surfa c e c o ntours are ind ic ative o f the water level at the tim e o f well c o m p letio n. T he ground water level within a n aquifer c o nsta ntly fluctuates in resp o nse to ra infa ll, eva p o tra nsp iratio n, ground water m o vem ent, a nd pum p a ge. T herefo re, current site-sp ec ific c o nd itio ns m a y d iffer due to lo c a l or seaso na l variatio ns in m easured static water levels. Bec ause fluctuatio ns in ground water are typ ic a lly sm a ll, static water levels c a n be used to c o nstruct a genera lized PSM. Ground water flo w is natura lly fro m areas o f rec harge to ward areas o f d isc harge. As a genera l rule, but c erta inly no t a lwa ys, gro und water flo w a p p ro xim ates the o verlying to p o gra p hy a nd intersects the la nd surfa c e at m a jo r strea m s. T he c o nto urs were d eterm ined b a sed o n the a m o unt o f d a ta a nd the d egree o f c ha nge in water levels between wells.T he p o tentio m etric surfa c e c o ntours are m a p p ed p rim arily fo r the up p er 100 feet o f the unc o nso lid a ted m ateria ls a nd utilize d ata fo r wells 100 feet o r less in d ep th. When sha llo w d ata is sp arse or una va ila b le in a n area, d eep er wells are used to c o m p lem ent the m a p p ing. T he western ed ge o f Bartho lo m ew County a nd o ver m ost o f the eastern third o f the c o unty ha ve a lim ited unc o nso lid ated ground water aquifer p o tentia l. U nc o nso lid ated p o tentio m etric surfa c e elevatio n c o ntours ha ve no t b een extend ed to the eastern o r western ed ges o f Bartho lo m ew County. Ad d itio na l areas o f lim ited ground water aquifer p o tentia l ha ve been m a p p ed using large d ia m eter buc ket wells. T hese unc o nso lid ated d ep o sits are typ ic a lly very thin, genera lly less tha n 50 feet in thic kness. Ab o ut o ne-fo urth o f the wells in the c o unty are large d ia m eter b o red (buc ket wells) that pro d uc e fro m thin sea m s o f c o arse-gra ined m ateria l. T yp ic a lly these wells are c o nstructed at d ep ths o f 35 to 50 feet with either 30 or 36 inc h d ia m eter p o ro us c asing.Data c o llected to generate the PSM were sta nd ard ized a nd va lid ated fo r a c cura c y. U niversa l Tra nsverse Merc ator (U T M) c o o rd ina tes for the water wells were either p hysic a lly o bta ined in the field , d eterm ined through a d d ress geo c o d ing, or d eterm ined b ased o n water well rec o rds. T he lo c atio n o f the m a jo rity o f the water well rec o rds used to m a ke the PSM were field verified . Elevatio n d ata were d erived fro m a d igita l elevatio n m o d el b ased o n L iDAR. Qua lity c o ntro l/qua lity assura nc e pro c ed ures were utilized to refine o r rem o ve d ata where erro rs were rea d ily a p p arent.Potentio m etric surfa c e c o ntours are d evelo p ed b a sed o n the static water levels fro m the unc o nso lid a ted aquifer system s a nd d isp la yed here with 10-fo o t c o nto urs a nd 50-fo o t ind ex c o ntours. Potentio m etric surfa c e c o ntours in Bartho lo m ew Co unty ra nge fro m a high o f 700 feet m ea n sea level (m sl) in the east, to a lo w o f 570 feet m sl in the so uth. Ground water flo w d irectio n is genera lly to wards the m a jo r dra ina ge with a n o vera ll so uthern flo w. T he c o unty PSM c a n b e used to d efine the regio na l ground water flo w p ath a nd to id entify signific a nt areas o f ground water rec harge a nd d isc harge. County PSM’s represent o vera ll regio na l c hara c teristics a nd are no t intend ed to b e a substitute fo r site-sp ec ific stud ies.

®1 0 10.5 Mile

1 0 10.5 Kilo m eter

Digital Elevation Model of Bartholomew County, Indiana

Elevation (feet)1017

518

County Ro a d

Interstate§̈¦65

U S Highwa y£¤31

State Ro a d ¬«46

EXPLANATION

Strea m

L ine o f equa l elevatio n, in feet a b o ve m ea n sea levelPotentio m etric Co nto ur interva l 10 feet

670

No Aquifer Materia lor L im ited Data

L a ke & River

Munic ip a l Bo und ary

DNR Ma na ged L a nd s

U S Fed era l Ma na ged L a nd s