Top Banner
Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED June 2011
14

Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Jacquelyn Holly
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening

Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements

Craig R. Jones, CHPFran Szrom, CHP

UNCLASSIFIED

June 2011

Page 2: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

2UNCLASSIFIED

Disclaimer

The appearance of a manufacturer’s equipment does not imply endorsement of the equipment by the Army, DOD, or the

Federal Government.

Page 3: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Individual Screened– General-Use: 0.25 μSv (25

μrem) per screening

– Limited-Use: 0.01 mSv (1 mrem) per screening

– 0.25 mSv (25 mrem) per year

• Operator’s/Bystanders Annual Limit

– 1 mSv (100 mrem) per year

• Inspection zone – operators and bystanders outside inspection zone during screening

Introduction to Personnel Security Screening Systems

3UNCLASSIFIED

Page 4: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Purpose: Evaluate potential dose to the individual being screened

• Field measurements

– ANSI N43.17-2009 methodology (Reference Effective Dose)

• Energy correction, Dose conversion factors

– No estimate of eye or skin doses with survey instruments

• Dosimeter study requires

– Very large number of screenings

– Automated method for initiating screenings

– Using DDE as a surrogate for Reference Effective Dose

4UNCLASSIFIED

Background

Page 5: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

Test Setup – Repetitive Screening

5UNCLASSIFIED

• System 1:– Robotic solution

– 93,105 screenings

– ~ 2 weeks

• System 2:– Software solution

– 8,627 screenings

– < 1 week

Page 6: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

Test Setup - Phantoms

6UNCLASSIFIED

Page 7: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Maximum DDE per screening:

– 4,200 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.045 μSv (4.5 μrem)

• Average DDE per screening:

– 3,559 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.038 μSv (3.8 μrem)

• Minimum DDE per screening:

– 2,560 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.027 μSv (2.7 μrem)

7UNCLASSIFIED

System 1: Deep Dose Equivalent

Screenings to Reach 0.25 mSv (25 mrem)Annual Weekly Daily

Max DDE 5,542 107 15

Avg DDE 6,540 126 18

Min DDE 9,092 175 25

Page 8: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Maximum LDE per screening:

– 8,450 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.091 μSv (9.1 μrem)

• Average LDE per screening:

– 6,226 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.067 μSv (6.7 μrem)

• Minimum LDE per screening:

– 4,710 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.051 μSv (5.1 μrem)

8UNCLASSIFIED

System 1: Lens Dose Equivalent

Screenings to Reach 15 mSv (1500 mrem)Annual Weekly Daily

Max LDE 165,275 3,178 454

Avg LDE 224,329 4,314 616

Min LDE 296,513 5,702 815

Page 9: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Maximum SDE per screening:

– 15,050 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.162 μSv (16.2 μrem)

• Average SDE per screening:

– 10,552 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.113 μSv (11.3 μrem)

• Minimum SDE per screening:

– 7,420 μSv/93,105 screenings = 0.080 μSv (8.0 μrem)

9UNCLASSIFIED

System 1: Shallow Dose Equivalent

Screenings to Reach 50 mSv (5 rem)Annual Weekly Daily

Max SDE 309,319 5,948 850

Avg SDE 441,163 8,484 1,212

Min SDE 627,392 12,065 1,724

Page 10: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

System 2

10UNCLASSIFIED

Page 11: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Maximum DDE per screening:

– 540 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.063 μSv (6.3 μrem)

• Average DDE per screening:

– 416 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.048 μSv (4.8 μrem)

• Minimum DDE per screening:

– 250 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.029 μSv (2.9 μrem)

11UNCLASSIFIED

System 2: Deep Dose Equivalent

Screenings to Reach 0.25 mSv (25 mrem)Annual Weekly Daily

Max DDE 3,994 77 11

Avg DDE 5,184 100 14

Min DDE 8,627 166 24

Page 12: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Maximum LDE per screening:

– 650 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.075 μSv (7.5 μrem)

• Average LDE per screening:

– 516 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.060 μSv (6.0 μrem)

• Minimum LDE per screening:

– 280 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.033 μSv (3.3 μrem)

12UNCLASSIFIED

System 2: Lens Dose Equivalent

Screenings to Reach 15 mSv (1500 mrem)Annual Weekly Daily

Max LDE 199,085 3,829 547

Avg LDE 250,785 4,823 689

Min LDE 462,161 8,888 1,270

Page 13: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Maximum SDE per screening:

– 780 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.090 μSv (9.0 μrem)

• Average SDE per screening:

– 577 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.067 μSv (6.7 μrem)

• Minimum SDE per screening:

– 280 μSv/8,627 screenings = 0.033 μSv (3.3 μrem)

13UNCLASSIFIED

System 2: Shallow Dose Equivalent

Screenings to Reach 50 mSv (5 rem)Annual Weekly Daily

Max SDE 553,013 10,635 1,519

Avg SDE 747,574 14,376 2,054

Min SDE 1,540,536 29,626 4,232

Page 14: Potential Doses to Individuals Screened with Whole-Body Security Screening Systems: OSL Dosimeter Measurements Craig R. Jones, CHP Fran Szrom, CHP UNCLASSIFIED.

• Both systems evaluated comply with the ANSI/HPS N43.17-2009

dose per screening limit for general-use

• DDE is comparable to the Reference Effective Dose (ANSI/HPS

N43.17-2009)

• The annual number of screenings per individual is limited by the

DDE/Reference Effective Dose, not LDE or SDE.

14UNCLASSIFIED

Summary

Dose per Screening (μSv (μrem))

  Avg DDE Ref Eff Dose

System 1 0.038 (3.8) 0.033 (3.3)

System 2 0.048 (4.8) 0.046 (4.6)