1 Dear Linked in Members I could catch up with some interesting technical papers published by some leading Rubber Technologists across the World. Here they are edited for yr ready ref. Developments in Polymer Coatings for Dipped Goods By Bill Howe President, PolyTech Synergies LLC Canal Fulton, Ohio USA (Latex glove donning requires lubricious surfaces other than powders.)
Dear Linked in Members I could catch up with some interesting technical papers published by some leading Rubber Technologists across the World. Here they are edited for yr ready ref.
Developments in Polymer Coatings for Dipped Goods By Bill Howe President, PolyTech Synergies LLC Canal Fulton, Ohio USA
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Dear Linked in Members I could catch up with some interesting technical papers published by some leading Rubber Technologists across the World. Here they are edited for yr ready ref. Developments in Polymer Coatings for Dipped Goods By Bill Howe President, PolyTech Synergies LLC Canal Fulton, Ohio USA
(Latex glove donning requires lubricious surfaces other than powders.)
2
(Polymer coatings are applied on-line in properly designed dip tanks)
(The catheter industry has routinely used silicone lubricious coatings for
patient comfort)
The use of corn starch, calcium carbonate, and talc as slip agents for
dipped products has seen better days for those manufacturing these
processing products. Historically, these products of choice dominated
latex processing as an anti-tack and donning application agent. The
3
manufacturing of products using powders was generally quite simple to
control, and easy to apply during the manufacturing process. A simple
controlled dosage of powder in a water or alcohol slurry tank normally
produced acceptable results, followed by de-powdering through a
tumbling process. Products such as gloves, condoms, finger cots,
breathing bags, medical balloons, probe covers, and toy balloons all use
this approach routinely during the manufacturing process.
However, with the advent of heightened alerts of latex allergies in the
1990’s, it was determined that proteins could be spread by residual
airborne powder from using latex gloves, which in turn jeopardized latex
sensitized personnel who could potentially react to latex allergens. This
led to the growth of powderfree latex products, which was primarily
achieved through chlorination of the finished product. Powders were
still employed in the manufacturing process for purposes of anti-tack of
work-in-process inventory. The finished latex products were then
transferred to a chlorination room where separate processing equipment
enabled the product to be subjected to chlorine, which in turn removed
the processing powders, and altered the surface of the film, allowing for
improved donnability and/or lubricity of the product.
However, there were many disadvantages to chlorination as a choice to
achieve the feature of powderfree donnable products, such as:
• Controlling levels of chlorination during batch processing proved
challenging, yielding batches with different donnability
characteristics, frustrating manufacturers and end users.
4
• Thin film products such as medical gloves and finger cots,
required extensive downstream handling, adding to
manufacturing cost. These products required a two cycle
chlorination process – one for each side of the product, with a
manual turning operation in between. This was necessary
because the thin film characteristics did not allow the chorine
batch to penetrate the inside of the product successfully.
Exceptions to this problem are household gloves, and other
thicker film products which allowed the chlorine batch to properly
penetrate the inner layer using one cycle only.
• Chlorination tends to degrade and weaken latex film properties. At
times, the chlorination-associated glove degradation results in
poor glove donning. Also, chlorinated gloves tend to adhere to
each other as part of the packaging process, especially exam
gloves and finger cots, which are packed in bulk boxes or poly-
bags.
• Those attempting to reduce downstream manufacturing handling
cost by applying the chlorine on-line during the dipping process
were introduced to other challenges of harrowing proportions. It
was often difficult to find space within existing dip lines to achieve
this process. Furthermore, without absolutely impeccable
ventilation control of chlorine fumes from the on line tanks, dip
lines were subjected to extensive corrosiveness from the process.
Those companies attempting to maintain a clean process found
the exercise futile, as particles were generated from damaged
machine structure and form carrier components.
5
• The buying marketplace generally did not warm up to the yellow
appearance of the dipped product, especially for surgical gloves.
The color “white” was king and perceived to be a more pristine,
reliable product.
In the 1980’s, a patent was issued for Biogel, a hydrogel product that
continues in use today. This coating was developed by then London
International Group, primarily for surgical gloves. This ingenious
product led to what today is a wave of choices for powderfree dipped
products through slip coatings. Enough history – let’s get on to today’s
choices for anti-tack and donning coatings.
Key RequirementsKey RequirementsKey RequirementsKey Requirements to Considerto Considerto Considerto Consider
Allegiance Healthcare (Cardinal Health), in its informative on-line
bulletin on “Powder Coatings for Powderfree Medical Gloves”, offers
some basic advice on preparing for the use of coating technologies for
latex products. The polymer design must consider the following
requirements:1
1. It must adhere to the underlying rubber latex substrate and offer
durability and good donning characteristics.
2. It must be resistant to chlorination and the vigorous post-forming
processing steps that can include rinsing, extraction, and drying.
3. It should not degrade after sterilization.
6
In Bill Williams’ (Research and Development Manager – Best
Manufacturing Co.) article from an earlier Rubber Asia article on “The
Science of Donning Coatings”, he states that donning coatings actually
serve two purposes. In addition to the obvious use discussed, which is
as a slip coating for donning latex products, he suggests that a second
purpose is to provide additional barrier properties. A properly applied
barrier film in some cases may reduce the affects of type 1 and type 4
allergic reactions. Agents such as anti-microbial agents, Aloe Vera and
vitamin E can be incorporated into the coating for improved benefit to
the end user. This is an excellent example of how differentiated the latex
glove business has become since the turn of the millennium.
In today’s highly differentiated product world of latex medical and
industrial products, the development of donning coatings can in be
applied to many substrate materials including natural rubber, nitrile,
1 “Research & Technology Supporting Your Decisions”,www.allegiance.net, p.1. 2 Fung Bor Chen, “Overview of Powder-Free Technology and Materials”, 2004 International Latex Conference – Akron, Ohio. 3 Y.S.T. Yeh, “Powder-free gloves with a silicone impregnated cross-linked polyurethane inner coating and method of making same, “US Patent Application No. 20020029402, March 14, 2002. 4 Y.S.T. Yeh, “Powder-free gloves with a silicone impregnated cross-linked polyurethane inner coating and method of making same, “US Patent Application No. 20020029402, March 14, 2002.
mportant Facts about Latex and Latex Gloves
Natural Rubber Latex Gloves - Made from a Renewable Resource Natural rubber (NR) latex gloves are natural products. They are derived from NR latex obtained from the Hevea Brasiliensis tree when the bark is tapped (Figure 1). This is unlike all synthetic gloves, which are made from petrol chemicals.
18
Figure 1. Natural rubber latex collected in a cup after skillful tapping of the bark of a Hevea Brasiliensis tree.
Raw NR Latex This is a milky fluid comprising 25%-40% of rubber hydrocarbon in the form of particles suspended in an aqueous serum together with a few percent of other non-rubber substances such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, sugars, some metals, fatty acids, and other substances, known as the non-rubber fraction. The remaining major component is water.
NR Latex Concentrate Latex collected from the tree after tapping is concentrated generally by centrifugation, to remove much of the aqueous components. The concentrated latex with about 60% dry rubber content (or drc) is then usually preserved with ammonia to combat bacterial growth. The resulting latex concentrate becomes the starting material for all natural rubber latex products, whether by dipping (for gloves, balloons, condoms, catheters, baby soothers, rubber tubing, toys and dental dams) or other processes such as foaming (for latex foam to sponge), or extrusion (for latex thread, more commonly known as "elastic").
Steps in the Manufacturing Process
The manufacture of most NR latex gloves follow roughly the same sequence. However, many manufacturers include processing steps that reduce the level of protein in their gloves. The typical glove manufacturing process is as follows:
19
The salient features of the above manufacturing processes include the following:
Dipping: Liquid latex concentrate is mixed with various compounding chemicals and is introduced into one of the tanks in the processing line. Clean, dry formers in the shape of hands are immersed first in a coagulant and then in the latex mix for appropriate dwell time to give the desired latex film thickness. The coagulant is applied to facilitate the deposition of a layer of latex on the formers.
Wet-gel leaching and beading: The thin latex film on each former is partially dried and leached briefly in clean water to remove the water-soluble materials. Beading also is introduced at this stage to give each glove a rolled bead or rim at the open end.
Drying and curing: The gloves are then dried and vulcanized. Drying and vulcanization or curing of the gloves are usually done in hot-air ovens, initially at lower temperatures of 80ºC, and then at higher temperatures of 100º-140º C where necessary.
20
Post-cure leaching or dry-film leaching: The cured gloves are immersed in clean water tanks to remove more water-soluble substances, particularly proteins on the surface of the gloves.
Powdered gloves: The leached gloves are dipped into cornstarch powder slurry to pick up a coat of lubricant that makes them easier to don. They are then further dried.
Glove stripping: This is the final operation on the production line - removal of gloves from the formers. This is often carried out manually, frequently with the assistance of compressed air, but an automatic stripping system is becoming more common.
Powder-free gloves: Latex gloves with very little or no powder lubricant can be prepared by either (i) chlorination or (ii) polymer coating. While chlorination oxidizes the outer rubber surface to eliminate tackiness and reduce the residual soluble protein content, polymer coating involves replacing powder with a suitable lubricating coat on the glove surface. Both processes can be carried out on-line, without the powder-coating step, or off-line by washing first the finished powdered gloves, then subjecting them to the chlorination or polymer-coating treatment.
Removing Glove Proteins Protein Status in Latex
When subjected to ultracentrifugation at approximately 59,000 gmax, latex can be separated into three main fractions: (i) top rubber hydrocarbon fraction, (ii) the ambient serum (known as C-serum) in which all rubber particles are suspended, and (iii) the denser bottom non-rubber particle fraction, particularly lutoids, which contain yet another serum (known as B-serum).
• Yip E. & Cacioli P, The manufacture of gloves from natural rubber latex, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2002; 110: S3-14
Like all plant materials, Hevea latex contains proteins. Of the approximately 1% of total proteins present in the latex system, about one-quarter are found on rubber particle surfaces (i), the remaining three-quarters are in the non-rubber phase [fractions (ii) and (iii)] of the latex, and they are mostly water soluble (Figure 3).
21
Figure 3. Freshly collected Hevea Brasiliensis latex separated into its three main fractions upon ultra centrifugation at 59,000 gmax.
When processed into latex concentrate, considerable amounts of the soluble proteins are removed. Further conversion of the latex concentrate into gloves removes more of these proteins through the leaching and washing steps. Therefore, the remaining levels of soluble proteins - or the residual extractable proteins implicated in allergic reactions - are markedly low. Depending on which manufacturing process is used, the level of residual extractable protein can vary widely.
• Dalrymple S.J. and Audley G.B. "Allergenic proteins in dipped products: Factors influencing extractable protein levels," Rubber Developments, 1992; 45(2/3):51
• Yunginger J.W., Jones R.T., Fransway A.F., et al. "Extractable proteins in disposable medical gloves and other rubber products," J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1994; 93: 836
• Ng K.P, Yip E., Mok K.L. "Production of Natural Rubber Latex Gloves with Low Extractable Protein Content: Some Practical Recommendations," J. nat. Rubber Research, 1994; 9:8795.
22
Latex Allergens Not all proteins in the residual extractable fraction cause the allergic reaction. Although to date 13 proteins (mostly soluble) in raw Hevea latex have been reported to be possible allergens as defined by their display of IgE antibody binding activities, it is unlikely that all of them would be present in the finished products after processing.
• Alenius H., Turjanmaa K. and Palosuo T. "Natural rubber latex allergy," Occup. Environ, Med, 2002; 59: 419-424;
Cross Reactivity “Close structural similarities between any two allergens from divergent sources can produce similar allergic reactions in sensitive patients, and is termed cross-reactivity or cross-sensitization. Ingestion of some foods could produce allergic symptoms in patients sensitive to latex proteins due to the presence of these common or cross-reactive protein allergens, such as in the case of avocado, banana, chestnut and kiwi. However, it is important to note that not all food-allergic individuals are sensitive to latex, and not all patients with latex allergies will have problems with these foods. A study of binding patterns of IgE antibodies from the blood sera of individuals, who were not latex allergic but who had reactions to fruits, supported this. The study findings also showed that multiple bindings could occur between latex serum proteins and IgE from many who reacted to extracts of fruits but not to latex gloves. On the other hand, more specific and fewer bindings to latex protein were observed by those who were skin tested positive to latex glove extracts.”
• Hasma H., Shahnaz M., Yip E., Azizsah M., Mok K.L. and Nasuruddin B.A. "Binding Patterns of IgE Antibodies in Sera of Rubber Tappers to Fresh Hevea Latex Serum Proteins," J. Rubber Research, 1998; 1(3): 146-153
23
Allergenicity of Latex Gloves The allergenic potential of latex gloves can be measured in-vivo by skin-prick testing (SPT) on latex-allergic subjects, or in-vitro by specific IgE antibody-inhibition immunoassays. The SPT method is known to be more specific and more sensitive than the IgE binding techniques. However, all of these methods are relatively sophisticated, and require further improvements, and they are also expensive to perform. The presently preferred method is the quantification of total proteins using the modified Lowry micro-assay, which is technically easy and possible to standardize as well as cost effective. However, the test is not allergen specific. Nevertheless, significant correlations between residual total extractable protein content and the allergen levels of extracts of NR latex gloves based on both serological IgE specific inhibition immunoassays, and the SPT testing, have been established. Latex gloves with high residual extractable protein contents are associated with positive SPT or high allergen contents. Latex gloves with very low residual extractable proteins, on the other hand, tend to have very low or negligible SPT reactions by latex sensitive subjects.
24
Figure 4. Total extractable protein content (as measured by modified Lowry assay) of latex gloves and percentage negative skin prick test response shown by latex sensitive subjects. (Ref: Yip E., Turjanmaa K., Ng K.P. and Mok K.L. "Residual extractable proteins and allergenicity of
natural rubber products," J. nat. Rubber Research, 1994; 9: 79-86;)
Figure 5. Total extractable protein content and allergen level of 46 lots of latex gloves, as determined by modified Lowry test and IgE latex specific ELISA-inhibition respectively. (Ref:
Yip E., Palosuo T., Alenius H., and Turjanmaa K. "Correlations between total extractable proteins and allergen levels of natural rubber latex gloves," J. nat. Rubber Research, 1997; 12: 120
25
This method, although non-allergen specific, offers a technically easy and standardizable method that is very helpful in product developments and improvements.
• Yip E., Turjanmaa K., Ng K.P. and Mok K.L. "Allergic Responses and Levels of Extractable Proteins in NR Latex Gloves and Dry Rubber Products," J. nat. Rubber Research, 1994; 9: 7986;
• Yip E., Palosuo T., Alenius H., and Turjanmaa K. "Correlation Between Total Extractable Proteins and Allergen Levels of Natural Rubber Latex Gloves," J. nat. Rubber Research,12: 120-130;
• Palosuo T., Makinen-Kiljunen S., Alenius H., Reunala T., Yip E. and Turjanmaa K. "Measurement of natural rubber latex allergen levels in medical gloves by allergen-specific IgE-ELISA-inhibition, RAST inhibition, and skin prick test," Allergy, 1998; 53: 59-67;
• Beezhold D., Pugh B., Liss G. and Sussman G. "Correlation of protein levels with skin prick test reactions in patients allergic to latex," J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 1998; 98: 1097-1162;
• Yip E. and Sussman G. L. "Allergenicity of latex gloves with reference to protein sensitive individuals in a Canadian population," J. nat. Rubber Research, 2000; 3: 129-141.
Protein Reduction - Product Improvement Residual extractable protein content of gloves can now be reduced from as high as 1,000µg/g of gloves to a low of less than 50 µg/g using improved manufacturing technologies, which include:
o Use of low-protein latex concentrates o Proper leaching protocols o Chemical or enzymatic deproteinization o Chlorination o Polymer-coating
26
AUTOMATIC STRIPPING OF GLOVES IN A HIGH VOLUME PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT - A TECHNICAL PRESENTATION AT MARGMA GLOVE CONFERENCE; K-L, MALAYSIA; 1999 – By: By: William L. Howe President PolyTech Synergies LLC 8751 Mardel Ave. NW Canal Fulton, OH 44614 USA (P) 330 854 6715
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Probably no innovation in the 1990's for automation in the glove manufacturing sector has impacted productivity of manufacturing plants like that of technology for automatic stripping of gloves. The purpose of this paper is to inform and prepare the reader for the following;
1. Identification of the critical evaluation factors before investing in technology for automatic stripping.
2. he general techniques employed today for successful automatic stripping of gloves.
3. ealistic expectations for commissioning and performance of the technology.
4. To spur creative thinking and planning for related downstream automation, connected to production machine auto strip devices.
In general, this paper will address techniques for unsupported thin gauge gloves, with brief mention of techniques for household gloves and supported industrial work gloves.
2.0 TECHNIQUES
27
The writer and his company have identified and/or designed for five (5) different techniques for automatic stripping. These techniques can also be considered for dipped products other than gloves, such as bags, condoms, catheters, balloons, etc. Selection technique for each application will depend upon many factors, which will be identified and briefly described in Section 3.0 of this presentation.
2.1 Pressure Pad / Rotating Brushes
This technique is used primarily for a "straight-off " stripping of a dipped product. For the glove industry, one will find this technique utilized for stripping of supported industrial work gloves.
Typically, a pair of cushioned pads (to protect ceramic formers) would encase the glove former as it passes, using a two axis motion (squeeze and drop), which through pressure, will enable the glove to loosen and free from the mold, for deposition onto a conveyor or tote bin.
A similar technique uses a pair of rotating brushes, which encase the former. The brush technique typically involves the use of one axis motion only (brush rotation) to accomplish the strip. However, a second axis can be added to accommodate different size formers entering the same brush system. This second axis is often accomplished with the use of compressed air or mechanical spring, to enable the brush to adjust to the differing former diameters.
The rotating brush technique is seldom employed with glove stripping, and is more conducive to " straight-off " stripping of symmetrical dipped products, such as condoms and toy balloons (See Figure 2. 1. 1).
2.2 Water Jet
Though not a popular choice for glove stripping, the use of water jets can enable gloves to be automatically removed from molds, if the "straight-off" method is desired. The primary disadvantage of this approach is that the glove becomes wet, which necessitates more attention to glove collection and downstream drying.
28
The writer has specified the use of water jet systems for back-up stripping, when requested. In this format, the actual automatic stripping is first conducted by "dry" means in the main stripping station. If gloves are missed (which is a normal occurrence), the water jet(s), located in the former washing station, would eject gloves from the mold onto a screen inside a containment tank. Normally, the gloves removed using this back up technique, are considered as Scrap.
The use of water stripping is more common for use with symmetrical products such as condoms and toy balloons.
2.3 100% Compressed Air
If removing unsupported gloves via a "straight-off" technique, the most reliable method is by compressed air, which typically requires significant volume and pressure to accomplish the strip. If the manufacturer is chlorinating both glove sides downstream, this method can be employed successfully. Otherwise, the texture of the mold is transferred over to the inside of the glove, which is typically not the preferred result. Furthermore, the outside of the glove when used, would represent the side of the glove having seen most effects of the protein wash station. This means that the inside of the glove, which is next to the user's skin, would be the side not seeing the effects of the protein wash.
The use of "straight-off" technique via air has the advantage of being a low cost in capital investment. However, operational costs are typically considered as high.
2.4 Combination Air/Mechanical
The technique patented by the writer's company, combines the use of compressed air and mechanical grasp, which has been designed for reversing the glove during the pick to minimize downstream product handling.
An artist rendering of the concept can be seen in Figure 2.4. 1. The technique is most commonly employed with continuous chain lines. A key consideration is that of line speed and the ability to synchronize the
29
apparatus with the movement of the line. The system shown accomplishes that with mechanical gearing in conjunction with the conveyor chain. A second method for synchronization would be to accomplish this electronically by communicating pulses to the conveyor drive motor.
This technique (first proven in production in the late 1980's), uses a three (3) step approach as follows;
• First, engage a set of fingers to "hold" the glove at the middle finger area of the former.
• During the engagement of the mechanical finger, a blast of air is enacted at the cuff area (effective for both beaded and non-beaded gloves) so that the film begins to move down the mold. The "holding" device prevents the fingers from inflating, which in conjunction with the air blast, allows the cuff area to reverse on itself, with the cuff area surrounding the mechanical fingers.
• Thirdly, the mechanical "grasp" fingers cam away from the former, leaving the glove cuff free to be removed with a final set of rotating brushes into a vacuum delivery system or moving conveyor. This effectively fully reverses the glove.
This technique has been considered an effective approach in stripping natural rubber latex gloves. I believe it fair and accurate to say that this specific technology has had limited success in conjunction with other polymers, such as nitrile and neoprene.
Investment capital cost and operational cost for this technology are considered in the moderate range.
2.5 Full Mechanical Pick Technique
Common sense would inform us that the best motion to simulate for automatic stripping would be that of the human motion. This technique involves the automation simulation of that thought. An example of such a technique can be seen in Figures 2.5. 1. The device normally employs the use of 3 axes for both batch machine and chain machine applications.
30
The key to its success is that of accurately engaging the "finger grasp mechanism" to the bead on the glove or inside the cuff of the glove. This accuracy is often accomplished by a roll down brush followed by mechanical finger engagement in the cuff area, followed by a roll up brush back over the fingers. The two mechanical fingers are now positioned between the glove film and the former. After this first step is accomplished, the mechanism can be moved vertically in a downward stroke, to effectively reverse the glove and remove it from the mold.
This technique has more universal appeal to different types of polymers, including natural rubber latex, nitrile, neoprene, and PVC.
However, the primary disadvantage to this technology is that capital acquisition cost is typically high. Furthermore, on going maintenance costs make for moderate to high operational cost as well.
This technique is adaptable to both batch dipping systems or chain dipping systems.
3.0 CRITICAL FACTORS FOR SUCCESS
The following factors must be evaluated before advancing into the design and implementation phase of automatic stripping. A brief commentary on each factor will assist the reader in evaluation of his or her own factory situation.
3.1 Type of Machine
Two primary types of dipping units are employed in production manufacturing - batch and continuous chain. The technique used for automatic stripping will differ in accordance with the general overall type or machine employed. General access into tile former rack or individual former is a consideration and must be evaluated.
A batch machine often employs the use of pallets measuring 1.5 by 3.0 meters, containing a dense former pack. The key to consider automatic stripping in this environment is accessibility to all formers. The best condition for batch machines are those whereby individual former
31
"strips" (containing several formers) separate from the pallet, which enables free and clear access for the automation.
The key consideration for chain lines is that of former orientation and chain speed. For nonrotating former chain lines, orientation of the molds are already accomplished, making for an ideal auto stripping condition. However, rotating former lines, which are the most common type used in Asian factories, require the adaptation of a former orientation system when entering into .the automatic device. This can be accomplished with a "carrier spoke" or "D" cam device (machined flat surface on a round bar), both of which contact and slide across a frictionless surface to stabilize the mold.
3.2 Type of Glove and Sizing
In general, supported gloves utilize the "straight-off" techniques and unsupported gloves necessitate the "glove reversal" techniques available. However, there are some exceptions to unsupported gloves, which can mandate "straight-off" approach.
In general, ambidextrous gloves are easier to strip than hand specific ones, considering the reversal technique. The protruding thumb on a surgical glove former can make for a stubborn strip, unless employing the proper technique. Another consideration for hand specific gloves is that of straight finger versus curved finger design. The most challenging combination would be that of a curved finger surgical-mold, produced on a continuous chain conveyor. It can be accomplished but generally by using the full mechanical pick technique described in Section 2.5, which can involve a sizable investment in capital.
3.3 Type of Polymer
The type of polymer employed will also greatly sway the selection technique. A general order of automatic stripping complexity by glove polymer list for unsupported gloves, in the opinion of the writer, is as follows, listed from easiest to hardest;
Easiest 1 Natural rubber latex
32
2 PVC
3 Nitrile
4 Neoprene
5 Styrene butadeine
6 Silicone
Hardest 7 Polyurethane
3.4 Former Shape and Texture
Mention has already been made for the consideration of ambidextrous gloves (formers) versus hand specific gloves (formers). However, another key to auto stripping successfully, lies in the former shape and texture.
For natural rubber exam gloves, a more "tapered" mold shank from cuff to wrist area, functions better for certain strip techniques, particularly the combination air and mechanical approach. The other key area of the mold is that of the thumb orientation or protrusion. A more gradual 1, sloping" thumb allows the glove to work its way over the mold more easily, versus a sharp bend at this area.
A lesser consideration, at least for natural rubber products, is that of glove texture. In general, all former surfaces can adapt well for unsupported natural rubber glove former textures employed, including unglazed, spray bisque, and glazed. However, for synthetic polymers such as silicone and polyurethane, a glazed former surface will perform more consistently for removal techniques, both manual and automatic.
3.5 Glove Sizing Management
This factor may not affect many of the participants of this conference. In general, most current chain lines in Asia are dedicated to one glove size only. This is the most simplistic condition under which to address automatic glove stripping. Some of these machines (rotating form - over and under chain), may employ one size former on one line side, with another size former on the other machine side. This also represents a favorable condition.
33
However, larger volume machines (the writer's company has designed machines with volumes up to 60,000 pieces per hour) typically contain several gloves sizes on the same system. Therefore, two further considerations must be given to this condition;
1. The technique employed must be able to adapt to different former sizes coming through the system.
2. After, the automatic strip is. accomplished, size sortation must be considered, which can be accomplished manually by a single operator, or by additional automatic means.
3.6 Polymer Formulation
One word of caution to anyone considering implementation of automatic stripping technology to their plant - be prepared to aller your latex and coag formulations, if necessary. The writer is not qualified to comment on specifies of formulation adjustment. However, we have more often than not, seen our customer base require some modification to their formulation to avoid glove tearing (if using compressed air source as part of the technique) and ease of release from the mold. The amount of mold release in the coag may require adjustment.
3.7 Current Level of Formulation Reliability and Equipment Reliability
This is key - key - key. The writer cannot emphasize enough the importance of consistent glove production in a manual stripping environment, before investing in automatic technology. Inconsistent formulation management in film properties from day to day, machine to machine, etc. can allow the auto strip technology to work some days, and falter on other days. For example, if the level of calcium carbonate in the coag fluctuates, auto strip effectiveness can plummet.
On the machine side, one important performance statistic is that of "good beads (rolled cuffs)". If the bead roller unit on the machine misses beads from time to time, you can expect the auto strip device to do the same. If the system oven performance fluctuates thus causing the general state of curing to decrease, auto stripping performance will
34
suffer. In general, auto stripping works best with a more highly cured glove.
You should consider yourself a candidate for automatic stripping technology only if your day to day machine and formulation performance is consistent and reliable.
4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNOLOGY
The candidate for automatic stripping technology, after determining that they meet all prerequisites for institution of the automation, must be prepared to exercise patience during implementation.
Initially, the first phase of the evaluation, which is proper identification of technology, should occur by an on site study on the part of the automation provider. After thorough assessment of the application and other factors, expect a design phase to ensue, even in the event the automation provider has already supplied technology to other firms. As insinuated throughout this paper, every plant can differ in machine conveyance, type, speed, and especially formulation. The state of glove cure at the strip station is crucial for reliable performance.
After this phase, the automation equipment is fabricated and assembled for installation at the user's plant. Installation of the technology normally would require from 3 to 7 days to complete.
The commissioning phase of the technology is the area whereby the user needs to exercise patience. Several adjustments to the technology are typically necessary. As previously mentioned, it may by imperative for the formulation to change to assist reliable take off of the glove.
Itemized below for the reader's review is a representation of a typical schedule for an automation program;
Phase One Technology Identification 2 to 6 weeks Phase Two Engineering Design 3 to 9 weeks Phase Three Build Equipment 8 to 10 weeks
35
Phase Four Install Equipment 2 to 3 weeks Phase Five Commission and Debug to 12 weeks TOTAL PROGRAM 20 to 40 weeks
5.0 I A CHALLENGE FROM THE AUTHOR
The writer encourages the reader to not limit the prospects of their plant to automatic stripping alone. Without question, the implementation of auto strip technology will make for significant productivity improvements in your operation.
However, my challenging question to the reader is this - why limit your thinking to that of glove removal only? Today, in the USA, few glove manufacturing plants remain due to many reasons, the primary one being competitive forces and productivity improvements over the last 15 years in Asian operations.
The plants that remain active and successful in the USA, in general, are successful for one reason - they have nearly removed all plant labor from the manufacturing process. This means they not only strip gloves automatically in a reliable fashion, but after stripping automatically sort gloves, and automatically convey them to the packing room, automatically moving them through any tumble drying necessary, and automatically counting and orienting the gloves, into an automatic packing operation.
The writer has not only seen the advent of this technology, but has been intimate with it in concept and design. My challenge to you is to have this vision for your factory. This is not"drawing board fluff" -it is reality for the 20th century and beyond.