Politics and Elections. 2 The Origins of Political Parties Madison’s view of “faction” First U.S. political parties: Federalists and Anti- Federalists.

Politics and Elections

2

The Origins of Political Parties

• Madison’s view of “faction”

• First U.S. political parties: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

• Battle began over a strong central government vs. states’ and individual rights

“Congressional Pugilists,” a 1798 political cartoon

3

The Origin of Political Parties: Hamilton vs. JeffersonHamilton

• Strong federal governmentJefferson

• Limited national authority• Rule by elite • Believed in ability of farmers

and common people to rule themselves• Loose interpretation of

Constitution • Strict interpretation of Constitution• Favored national bank

• Favored payment of national debt, not state debts

• Favored paying state debts • Opposed national bank• Supported merchants,

landowners, investors, wealthy• Tended to support France in

foreign affairs• Tended to support Britain in

foreign affairs• Followers formed the

Democratic-Republican Party, which eventually became the Democratic Party

• Followers formed the Federalist Party, which eventually became the Republican Party

4

The Evolution of Political Parties

• Federalist Party: first U.S. political party

• Democratic-Republicans formed in opposition to the Federalists

• Democratic Party developed from the Democratic-Republicans

• Whig Party arose to counter the Democratic Party

Andrew Jackson

Henry Clay

Daniel Webster

5

The Evolution of Political Parties (continued)

• The Republican Party rose from the ashes of the Whig Party

• The Democratic Party lost influence from its association with the Southern states during the Civil War

• The Republican Party became the dominant party in the second half of the 19th century

• The Democratic Party regained support via the reform movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries

An 1860 campaign poster for Abraham Lincoln

6

The Role of Political Parties

• Parties organize individuals with similar ideas who work to effect political change

• Citizens may freely choose their party affiliation, or opt to have none at all

• Parties can represent a wide variety of interests

• Parties aim to elect people to government who will help pass laws in their favor

7

Third Parties in a Two-Party System

• Usually form in opposition to one or both major parties

• Have had great influence without ever winning the presidency

• Bring attention to important public issues ignored by the major parties

• Complaints about third parties:

– They take votes away from major candidates with similar positions

– Supporting a third-party candidate “wastes” one’s vote

Third-party poster from the 1912 presidential campaign

8

Discussion Questions1. What are factions, and why did James Madison and many of

the other Founders distrust them?

2. Trace the development of the first political parties in the United States. What were these parties, when did they arise, who led them, and who were their major supporters?

3. What is the role of a political party? How do third parties usually form? Do you think they are good for the American political system? Why or why not?

9

The Constitutional Basis for Presidential Elections

• The Constitution’s Framers doubted the public’s ability to directly elect its leaders

• Article II: Electors from each state vote directly for president

• 1804: The 12th Amendment changed the electoral process to a presidential/vice-presidential ticket

Verifying the Electoral College vote in the House of Representatives, 1913

10

The Presidential Election Process

• The public votes for president in November every four years

• The members of the Electoral College cast the official votes for president the next month, in December

November 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

26 27 28 29 30 31 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 1 2 3 4 5 6

December 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

30 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

28 29 30 31 1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11

The Presidential Election Process (continued)

• Each state has a designated number of electors

• In most states, electoral votes are awarded on a “winner take all” basis; Nebraska and Maine use proportional distribution

• Out of 538 electoral votes, candidates need 270 to win election Electoral College votes by state

12

The Road to the White House

• “Throwing one’s hat in the ring”

• On the campaign trail:

– Campaigning

– Caucuses and primaries

– Nominating conventions

13

The Road to the White House (continued)

On the campaign trail:

• Nominating conventions

• Campaigning and more campaigning

• Presidential “debates”

• General election

14

Opinion Polls and Their Influence

• Questions designed to measure the views or attitudes of a certain population

• Use in the political sphere

• Effectiveness

– Margin of error

– Factors affecting accuracy

15

Opinion Polls and Their Influence (continued)

• Tendency to sway voters

– The “bandwagon effect”

– The “underdog effect”

• How much should candidates or elected officials react to polls?

Controversy surrounding opinion polls:

16

Discussion Questions

1. How did the 12th Amendment change the way in which presidents and vice presidents are elected?

2. Why did the Constitution’s Framers develop the Electoral College? What determines the number of each state’s electoral votes? Do you feel this is an effective system, or should voters have the ability to directly elect the president?

17

Discussion Questions

3. What does “throwing one’s hat in the ring” mean? Describe the steps of a candidate’s run for the presidency.

4. How do political officials use opinion polls? What are some controversial effects that such polls have on the political process? Do you think opinion polls serve a valid purpose for political officials and the public?

18

The Media as Political Tools

• The inexpensive “penny press” made newspapers available to everyone

• Early political parties sponsored newspapers to promote their message

• Radio as a tool for political communication

• President Franklin Roosevelt’s “fireside chats” FDR just after giving a “fireside chat”

19

Television as a Political Tool

Advertisers discover the power of television as a political tool

Opening shot of a television ad for presidential candidate Dwight Eisenhower

• “Eisenhower Answers America”: Political ads created during the 1952 election

• New techniques developed to portray political candidates as “larger than life”

20

Television as a Political Tool (continued)

• President Kennedy and his use of television

– Facing his doubters

– Presidential press conferences

• President Reagan: “The Great Communicator”

– Projected a presidential image and his values

– Staged appearances

21

Political Advertising

Attack advertising

• “Daisy Girl”: Lyndon Johnson’s 1964 presidential campaign

A shot of the “Daisy Girl” from LBJ’s 1964 ad

22

Political Advertising (continued)

Attack advertising• Willie Horton:

George H.W. Bush’s 1988 presidential campaign

The “infomercial” • Ross Perot’s

1992 presidential campaign

Bush’s “Willie Horton” ad

Perot campaigning on

television

23

Political Advertising (continued)• Attack ads stir strong

emotions—positive in supporters, negative in opponents

• Contain some basis in truth

• Criticized for being unfair and emphasizing the trivial

• Becoming informed is the best defense against manipulation

A poster from the 1800s attacking

Whig presidential

candidate Zachary

Taylor

24

New Media in Politics and Government

• The potential of “new media”

• Web sites, e-mail, and blogs promote better communication between the government and the public

• Virtual political campaignsThe home page of the U.S. House of Representatives

25

New Media in Politics and Government (continued)

• Virtual political campaigns have also made raising money much easier

• The impact of new media on politicians, policy, and the public

Barack Obama’s Web site during his 2008 presidential campaign

26

Discussion Questions1. How did 19th-century political parties get their messages to

the public when the established papers wouldn’t carry them? What factors made this possible?

2. How did radio give FDR an advantage over past presidents in promoting his policies?

3. How were the visual techniques in the political advertisements entitled “Eisenhower Answers America” as effective in promoting Dwight Eisenhower as the answers he gave?

4. How did Presidents Kennedy and Reagan use television as an effective tool for promoting their policies?

27

Discussion Questions5. What are attack ads? Do you think they are an effective

means of campaigning? Do you think they are fair?

6. How has the Internet-based new media created a different relationship between political officials and voters?

7. How has the Internet changed the ways in which political campaigns operate?

8. Why must politicians and citizens effectively learn a new set of skills to utilize new media?

28

Direct Legislation

• Initiative: Citizens vote on new laws or amendments to a state’s constitution

• Referendum: Citizens vote to keep or reject legislation already passed

• Recall: Citizens decide whether to remove a public official from office before that official’s term expires

Arnold Schwarzenegger first became governor of California

through a recall election

29

Direct Legislation (continued)

Advantages of direct legislation:

• Strengthens popular sovereignty

• Counterbalances the influence of special-interest groups

• Serves to better inform the public about important issues

Disadvantages of direct legislation:

• Undermines the system of representative government

• Forces legislators to take the “safe route” on controversial issues

• May be influenced by special-interest groups

30

Election Reform

Instances of U.S. election reforms:

• The secret ballot

– Also called the “Australian ballot”

– Became widespread in the U.S. after 1884 election

• Direct election of senators

– Began in the state of Oregon

– Became federal law with the 17th Amendment

31

Reforming the Electoral College

Eliminate the Electoral College altogether:• The candidate with the popular majority (and at least 40

percent of the total vote) wins the election• A runoff election or congressional vote needed if no

candidate reaches 40 percentProposals to reform the Electoral College:

• Winner of each congressional district receives its electoral vote; winner of the most districts gets state’s two “senatorial” votes (as currently done in Maine and Nebraska)

• Distribute electoral votes proportionally by percentage of popular vote

32

Reforming the Electoral College (continued)

Arguments for reform:

• The simplicity of a proportional system

• Every vote carries equal weight

• Presidents have been elected without winning the popular vote

Arguments for keeping the current system:

• Promotes political stability by encouraging ideologically broad-based campaigns

• Provides for a “majority rule” rather than a minority of 40 percent

• Close elections in several states could prolong the final results and cause bitter disputes and/or lawsuits

33

Campaign Finance Reform

• In the U.S., a mixture of public and private money funds presidential elections.

• Private funding of elections:

– Pro: Any individual or entity can contribute to a campaign

– Con: Contributions often carry an expectation of something in return, promoting corruption

• Public funding of elections

– Pro: Levels the financial playing field

– Con: Takes away people’s ability to exercise free speech by giving money to a candidate they support

34

Campaign Finance Reform (continued)

• In U.S., private funding makes up the largest percentage of political campaign financing

• Two categories of private funding:

– “Hard money”—Contributed by individuals or organizations to support candidates or promote issues

– “Soft money”—Raised and distributed by political action committees to promote a candidate or issue

• Concern raised over the large amounts of money, especially “soft money”

• Buckley v. Valeo (1976) limited campaign contributions but not spending

35

Campaign Finance Reform (continued)

Efforts at campaign finance reform:

• Ross Perot and the Reform Party (1992 and 1996)

• Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (the “McCain-Feingold Act” 2002)

– Banned “soft money” donations to political parties

– Limited advertising by private and nonprofit entities

– Restricted parties’ use of funds for “issue ads”

• Survived Supreme Court scrutiny in McConnell v. FEC (2003)

36

Election Controversies: Gerrymandering

• First used in 1812 Massachusetts election

• Named for Governor Elbridge Gerry

• Newly drawn districts resembled a salamander

• Done to create an advantage in upcoming senatorial election

37

Election Controversies: Modern Redistricting

• State legislatures can change district boundaries every ten years

• Majority parties redraw legislative districts to create an electoral advantage

• Tends to discourage political competition and increases voter apathy

• Proposals for discouraging the process

Diagram illustrating how gerrymandering works

38

Election Controversies: Electronic Voting Machines

• Interest has grown in electronic voting since 2000 election

• Proponents say more reliable, less expensive, and more flexible than punch card machines

• Critics say unreliable, susceptible to fraud, and no accurate paper trail

39

Discussion Questions1. What are the three methods of direct legislation? After

reviewing their advantages and disadvantages, do you think they have a positive or negative effect on the legislative process?

2. What political and election reforms have been implemented or proposed in the United States since the mid-1800s? Which do you think is the most important, and why?

3. What is “gerrymandering”? Do you think it has a positive or negative effect on the political process?

4. Why have voting machines generated such controversy in recent years?