Poli 103A: California Politics Lecture 1 March 29, 2005.

Poli 103A: California Politics

Lecture 1March 29, 2005

Course Introduction and Progressivism I: The Recall

Today’s version of Progressive institutions •1911 device with ambiguous criteria: corruption

vs. dissatisfaction. Second oldest profession.

Campaigning in a complex environment•Wholesale vs. retail politics. Media in megastate

Effects on Policy?•Clear reaction against Gray Davis, car tax, and

deregulation. Vision for the future not clear.

Course Introduction and Progressivism I: The Recall

What this course is not about

What this course is about

Course plan and logistics

What This Course is Not About

How to be a good citizen.

•Preface. “We believe that increased participation by an informed citizenry in the politics of California is vitally needed…”

Power and Politics in California,

John H. Culver and John C. Syer, 1980





An Introduction to American Politics

•Begins with the Constitution

•Under a fixed set of rules, leaders react to an ever more complex society

•Consensus on the basic features of our political system and what there is to learn

What This Course Is About What you need to know in Sacramento

Mixture of political science research and political journalism

A state where the rules constantly change and no consensus tells us what to teach you

Course Plan and Logistics Part I: Political Institutions in Flux Part II: The Politics of Diversity Part III: Perspectives on Policy

Theme A: Cycles in California Politics Theme B: What Makes CA Different? Theme C: How Do We Know What We

Know?

Course Plan and Logistics Midterm on May 3: 25% of grade

Paper due on May 26: 30% of grade•Initiative campaign plan or policy analysis

Final on June 9: 40% of grade

“Section” attendance and participation: 5% of grade

Course Plan and Logistics Short biographies to begin each class:

•Extra credit on midterm

•Required on final

Last half hour is discussion section:•You must attend four over the quarter

•Be ready to discuss the readings

The Progressive Legacy I: Recall

The Purpose Behind the Process

All About Arnold•Getting on the Ballot

•Campaign Finance

•Analyzing the Results

Popular Feedback on Populism


A 1911 constitutional amendment pushed (along with initiative and referendum) by Gov. Hiram Johnson, the recall:•Was justified as a way to attack the graft

and corruption of the time.

•Does not specify the type of misdeed that it punishes; a “recallable offense” is whatever a majority says it is.

The Purpose Behind the Process:Wall of Shame

Targets of Progressive reformers:•Sen. Marshall Black (R-Santa Clara,1913)

•Sen. Edwin Grant (D-San Franciso, 1914)

Casualties of the Speakership fight:•Assm. Paul Horcher (R-Los Angeles, 1995)

•Assm. Doris Allen (R-Orange, 1995)


To recall a statewide officer:•Gather signatures of registered voters

equal in number to 12% of the last vote for that office.

•In five counties, gather signatures equal in number to 1% of that county’s vote.

To recall a legislator:•Equal in number to 20% of district vote.

The Purpose Behind the Process:The Dual Ballot

Yes or no vote on whether to recall the official in question.

Takes a majority (50% + 1 vote) to win.

All qualified replacement candidates appear on the same ballot.

Only takes a plurality (most votes) to win.


The 135 replacement candidates got on the ballot with 65 signatures and $3500.

All About ArnoldGetting on the Ballot

Recall petitions have been circulated for every governor, but none had qualified till Davis.

From Feb. 5th to April 24th, recall proponents collected about 100,000 signatures.

They needed to collect 897,156 valid signatures within 160 days.

All About ArnoldGetting on the Ballot

Congressman Darrell Issa (R-Vista) decided to lend his considerable financial resources to the race on April 24th, and eventually gave $3 million.

“I don’t think we took it at all seriously until Darrell Issa gave the money.” – Davis advisor Steve Smith.

July: 841,000 voluntary signatures, 1,319,000 through gatherers and mail.

All About Arnold:Campaign Finance

Unlike federal races, California’s campaigns used to have no limits on the size of contributions.

Proposition 34 limited contributions to $21,200. Loopholes:•No limits on “independent expenditures.”

•Candidates allowed to shift funds raised in old days to new campaigns

All About Arnold:Campaign Finance

Davis’ advantage: •Technically, he was opposing an initiative,

which cannot be corrupted, so contributions unlimited.

Schwarzenegger’s advantage:•Who needs contributions when you’re

rich? Gave himself $10 million and declared that he would arrive in Sacramento not owing anyone.

All About Arnold:$80 Million in 77 Days

Candidate Total Contributions

Gray Davis $17 million

Arnold Schwarzenegger $21.9 million

Cruz Bustamante $12.4 million

Independent Expend. $24.1 million

All About Arnold:Analyzing the Results

Recall Ballot 61.2% turnout. “Yes” won with

55.4% of the vote. About a quarter of

Democrats, 45% of Latinos, and 48% of union members supported recall.

Replacement Ballot Arnold won with

48.6% of the vote, a 17% margin of victory.

He attracted 23% of Democrats and 31% of Latinos.

All About Arnold: Analyzing the ResultsDemocrats Did Not Abandon Gray

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3/3/

2003

3/17

/200

3

3/31

/200

3

4/14

/200

3

4/28

/200

3

5/12

/200

3

5/26

/200

3

6/9/

2003

6/23

/200

3

7/7/

2003

7/21

/200

3

8/4/

2003

8/18

/200

3

9/1/

2003

9/15

/200

3

9/29

/200

3

OverallSupport forRecall (%)

DemocraticSupport forRecall (%)

RepublicanSupport forRecall (%)

All About Arnold:Party Registration

Blue: More than 54% Democratic Registration

White: 44%-54% Democratic

Red: Less than 44% Democratic Registration

All About Arnold:Support for the Recall

Blue: Less than 50% Support for Recalling Gray Davis

White: 50%-65% Support

Red: More than 65% Support for Recalling Gray Davis

All About Arnold:Turnout Shift Toward Republicans Was Temporary

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1998

Prim

ary

1998

Gen

eral

2000

Prim

ary

2000

Gen

eral

2002

Prim

ary

2002

Gen

eral

2003

Recall

2004

Prim

ary

Est

imat

ed P

erce

ntag

e of

All

Vot

ers

RegisteredDemocrats

RegisteredRepublicans

All About Arnold: Duverger’s Law Kicks In

Duverger’s Law: Because voters behave strategically, American-style races always come down to two parties/candidates.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Arnol

d Sch

warze

negge

r (R)

Cruz

Busta

man

te (D

)

Tom M

cClin

tock

(R)

Peter

Mig

uel C

amej

o (G

rin)

Ariann

a Huf

fingt

on (In

d)

Peter

V. U

eber

roth

129

Oth

er C

andi

date

s

ElectionResult

SeptemberTimes Poll


Public Policy Institute of California poll


Poli 103A: California Politics Lecture 1 March 29, 2005.

Documents

logistics slide

grade slide

populism slide

course plan

course introduction

politics of california

california politics

retail politics