8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
1/224
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND
COMPETENCY MAPPING
PROF. SHWETA MITTAL
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
2/224
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
3/224
Effective development of managers, McGregor wrote in a 1957
Harvard Business Reviewarticle, does not include coercing them
(no matter how benevolently) into acceptance of the goals of the
enterprise, nor does it mean manipulating their behavior to suit
organizational needs.
Rather, it calls for creating a relationship within which a man can
take responsibility for developing his own potentialities, plan for
himself, and learn from putting his plans into action.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
4/224
Druckers initial proposal of an MBO process to replace trait appraisals
and McGregors integration of a Theory Y approach into the
appraisal process produced a change in the way organizations went
about assessing the contributions of their members.
General Electric was singled out by McGregor as an example of a
company that was using an MBO/Theory Y approach to performance
appraisal.
GE conducted a truly scientific study in the early 1960s to test the
effectiveness of its annual, comprehensive appraisal approach.
It found that:
Criticism has a negative effect on achievement of goals.
Praise has little effect one way of the other.
Performance improves most when specific goals are established.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
5/224
Coaching should be a day-to-day, not a once-a-year activity.
Mutual goal setting, not criticism, improves performance.
Interviews designed primarily to improve a mans performance should not
at the same time weigh his salary or promotion in the balance.
Participation by the employee in the goal-setting procedure helps produce
favorable results.
These findings remain today as valid as they were when GE first developed
them.
Performance appraisal as a management tool spread quickly in the 1950s,
when about half of 400 employers surveyed reported using appraisal
systems.
Today, depending on the survey, somewhere between
three-quarters and nine-tenths of all companies use a formal performance
appraisal procedure.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
6/224
Armstrong and Baron (2004) observe that performance managementestablishes a shared understanding about what is to be achieved and an
approach to leading and developing people which will ensure that it is
achieved.
Performance management is a systematic and holistic approach to
identify critical dimensions of performance and to carry out activities
necessary to ensure that the missions , objectives , goals , vision , and
values of the organization are being met in an effective and efficient
Manner.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
7/224
According to Armstrong, PfM is a means of getting better results from
the organizations, teams and individuals by understanding and managing
performance within the agreed framework of planned goals andcompetency requirements. It is a process for establishing shared
understanding about what is to be achieved and an approach to
managing and developing people.
PfM Integrated Approach
Armstrong and Baron, defines PfM as a strategic and integrated approach
in delivering sustained success to organizations by improving
performance of people by developing the capabilities of teams and
individuals. These experts consider PfM as a strategic tool since it is
concerned with achievement of long-term organizational goals and
effective functioning of organizations in its external environment.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
8/224
PfM effects four types of integrations namely,
Vertical Integration :- Aligning objectives at organizational , individual ,
and team levels and integrating them for effective performance.
Functional integration :- It deals with focusing functional energies , plans,
Policies , and strategies onto tasks at different levels and parts of the
organization.
Human resource integration :- This ensures effective integration of
different subsystems of HR management to achieve the organizational goals
with optimum performance.
Goal integration :- It focuses on arriving at a congruence between the needs,
Aspirations, and goals of the managers with that of the goals and objectivesof the organization.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
9/224
Performance management is a continuous process of identifying ,
measuring, and developing the performance of individuals and teams
and aligning performance with the strategic goals of the organization.
EXAMPLES :- In Merrill Lynch , employees and managers set
employee objectives in the month of January.
Mid year reviews are taken.
Finally end of the year review incorporates feedback from several
sources, evaluates progress towards objectives and identifies areas
that need improvement. Managers also get extensive training on how to
set objectives and conduct reviews.
At Siemens , the performance management system is based
on three pillars : setting clear and measurable goals, implementing
concrete action, and imposing rigorous consequences.
A survey conducted by the consulting firm Watson Wyatt showed that
only 3 in 10 employees believe their companys performance review
system actually helped them improve their performance.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
10/224
Performance Management
is NOT
performance appraisal
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
11/224
PM is NOT performance appraisal
Performance Management
Strategic business considerations
Driven by line manager
Ongoing feedback
So employee can improve performance
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
12/224
PM is NOT performance appraisal
Performance AppraisalDriven by HR
Assesses employee Strengths &
Weaknesses
Once a year
Lacks ongoing feedback
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
13/224
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Performance management involves thinking through variousfacets of performance , identifying critical dimensions ofperformance, planning, reviewing and developing and enhancingperformance and related competencies.
It is simple, commonsensical and enjoyable.
Performance has many dimensions:-
1. Output or result dimensions
2. Input dimension
3. Time dimension
4. Focus dimension
5. Quality dimension
6. Cost dimension
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
14/224
Result and Output :- The most acceptable and visible as well as
measurable dimension of performance is result or the output. The sales
figures, customers numbers, financial targets etc are all stated in result
form. They are called key result areas.
Input Dimension :- The input dimension deals with the activities or tasks to
be accomplished by the individual. Performance equation says that any
individuals is a function of three sets of factors : ability or competence to
perform various tasks that lead to performance, motivation to carry on eachof these tasks or work efforts to carry out the tasks and the organizational
support one gets to carry out these tasks.
Time Dimension :- Performance can be defined for a task, for a day , for a
week, for a month , year or for life. The time period for performance is
important. Performance management is time bound as well as role specific.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
15/224
Focus :- The performance of a sales executive focus can be on market
Share , profits or new areas covered .
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
16/224
Difference between Performance Appraisal Systems and PMS
PAS PMS
Focus is on performance
appraisal and generation of
ratings.
Emphasis is on relative
evaluation of individuals.
Annual Exercise
Emphasis is on ratings and
Evaluation.
Focus is on performance
management.
Emphasis is on performance
improvements .
Continuous process.
Emphasis is on performanceplanning, analysis , review,
development and
improvements.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
17/224
PAS PMS
Rewards and recognition ofgood performance is an
important component.
Designed and monitored by
the HR department.
Ownership is mostly with the
HR department.
Defining and setting
performance standards is an
integral part.
Designed by the HR
department but could be
monitored by the respective
departments themselves.
Ownership is with linemanagers, HR facilitates its
implementation.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
18/224
PAS PMS
KPAs or KRAs are used as
planning mechanisms.
Developmental needs are
identified in the beginning of
the year on the basis of thecompetency requirements for
the coming year.
There are reviewmechanisms essentially to
bring performance
improvements.
KPAs and KRAs are used
for bringing in objectivity.
Developmental needs are
identified at the end of the
year on the basis of theappraisal of competency
gaps.
There are review
mechanisms to ensureobjectivity in ratings.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
19/224
Performance is what is expected to be delivered by an individual or
a set of individuals within a time frame. What is expected to be
delivered could be stated in terms of result or effort, tasks andquality , with specification of condition under which it is to be
delivered.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
20/224
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONSISTS OF THE
FOLLOWING :-
1.Defining performance taking into account all thecomplexities.
2.Planning performance both in terms of the input, output,
conditions under which these are to take place.
3.Analyzing performance and understanding what caused it
or contributed to it . Positively ? Negatively ?.
4. Developing capabilities to perform or the capability to give
inputs , possess competencies to convert the inputs intodesired output.
5. Monitoring and reviewing it.
6.Recognizing various dimensions of performance and
rewarding it where appropriate.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
21/224
OBJECTIVES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL THE
PAST
The appraisal system in most organizations are designedtoday to meet the following objectives :
1. To control employee behavior by using it as aninstrument for rewards, punishments and threats.
2. To make decisions regarding salary increases andpromotions .
3. To appraise people confidentially and generate dataabout employee for placement and promotion.
4. To identify the training and developmental needs of theemployees.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
22/224
NEW OBJECTIVES OF PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
Performance appraisal systems can serve the following purposes, if
designed properly:-
1. They can help each employee to understand more and more
about his role and become clear about his functions.
2. They can be instruments in helping each employee to understandhis own strengths and weaknesses with respect to his role and
functions in the company.
3. They can help in identifying the developmental needs of each
employee with respect to his role and functions.
4. They can increase mutuality between each employee and hissupervising officer.
5. They can be mechanisms of increasing communication between
employee and his supervising officer.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
23/224
6. They can be instruments to provide an opportunity for the employee for self
reflection and individual goal setting so that individual planned and monitored
development takes place.
7. They can play a role in helping every employee internalize the culture , norms
and values of the organization .
8. They can help in preparing employees for performing higher level jobs.
9. They can be instruments in the creation of a positive and healthy climate in
the organization that drives to give their best and enjoy doing so.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
24/224
A SUGGESTED FORMAT
In order to achieve these objectives the appraisalformat should have the following components:-
1. Identification of key performance areas and target
setting through periodic discussions between each
employee and his boss.
2. Identification of qualities required for the present and
future jobs in the company.
3. Self appraisal by the appraisee.
4. Performance analysis to identify factors that have
facilitated and factors that have hindered performance.
5. Performance discussion and counseling to understand
each other and assist each other.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
25/224
6. Identification of training needs.
7. Action planning and goal setting for future.
8. Final assessment by the supervising officer for administrative purposes.
SEQUENTIAL STEPS
The following sequences of activities is suggested for using the components
outlined so far :
1. In the beginning of the year every employee sits with his supervisor and
identifies his individual KPAs and sets challenging targets for the next year.
2. At the end of the year the employee appraises his performance on these
KPAs and targets as well as pre identified behaviors included in theappraisal format.
3. He then passes on his form to his supervisor. His supervisor reflects about the
performance of his appraisee and make his notes and comments. He then calls
the appraisee for the discussion.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
26/224
4. During the performance discussion they exchange notes, comments, etc and try to
understand and help each other. They also identify the development needs of the
appraisee and set goals for the next period.
5. The supervisor then gives his final ratings and recommends about the
developmental needs. He shows these to the appraisee and takes his comments if
needed and passes these on to the personnel department through his supervisor.
6. The personnel or HRD department uses these for training , rewards and other
activities.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
27/224
THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND REWARD
SYSTEMS
A performance management system can make thefollowing important contributions :-
Motivation to perform is increased
Self esteem is increased
Managers gain insight about subordinates :-Developing productive relationships with colleagues isa key competency for managers.
The definitions of job and criteria are clarified
(behavior and results )
( Specific criteria)
Self insight and development are enhanced
Administrative actions are more fair and appropriate.
Organizational goals are made clear.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
28/224
Employees become more competent.
There is better and more time differentiation between good
and poor performers.
Supervisors views of performance are communicated more
clearly. ( There is greater accountability in how managersDiscuss performance expectations and provide feedback. Both
assessing and monitoring the performance of others are listed
as key competencies for managers)
Organizational change is facilitated. e.g :- IBM (1980s)
Motivation commitment and intentions to stay in the
organization are enhanced.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
29/224
COMMENT ON THIS STATEMENT
Randy Pennington , president of Pennington PerformanceGroup . The truth is that the culture change is driven by a
change in performance. An organizations culture cannot be
installed. It can be guided and influenced by policies,
practices , skills and procedures that are implemented and
reinforced. The only way to change the culture is to changethe way individuals perform on the daily basis.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
30/224
DISADVANTAGES /DANGERS OF POORLY
IMPLEMENTED PM SYSTEMS
The negative consequences associated with low quality andpoorly implemented systems are :-
1. Increased turnover :- They can leave physically or withdrawpsychologically.
2. Use of misleading information
3. Lowered self esteem
4. Wasted time and money5. Damaged relationships
6. Decreased motivation to perform
7. Employee burn out and job dissatisfaction
8. Unjustified demands on managers and employees resources.
9. Varying and unfair standards and ratings
10. Emerging biases
11. Unclear rating system
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
31/224
Purposes of PM Systems:
Overview
Strategic
AdministrativeInformational
Developmental
Organizational maintenanceDocumentational
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
32/224
Strategic Purpose
Link individual goals with
organizations goals
Communicate most crucial businessstrategic initiatives
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
33/224
Administrative Purpose
Provide information for making
decisions re:
Salary adjustments
Promotions
Retention or termination
Recognition of individual performance
Layoffs
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
34/224
Informational Purpose
Communicate to Employees:
Expectations
What is importantHow they are doing
How to improve
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
35/224
Developmental Purpose
Performance feedback/coaching Identification of individual strengths and weaknesses
Causes of performance deficiencies
Tailor development of individual career path
Feedback is an important component of a well implemented performance management system.
Organizations should strive to create a feedbackculture that reflects support for feedback ,including feedback that is non threatening and isFocused on behaviors and coaching to helpinterpret the feedback provided.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
36/224
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE PURPOSE :- Important
component of workforce planning effort is the talent inventory, which
is information on current resources ( e.g., skills, abilities,
promotional potential, and assignment Histories of currentemployees). Performance management systems are the
primary means through which accurate talent inventories can be
assembled.
DOCUMENTATIONAL :-PMS allow for the documentation ofimportant administrative decisions.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
37/224
An Ideal PM System:
14 Characteristics
1. Congruent with organizational strategy
2. Thorough
3. Practical
4. Meaningful
5. Specific
6. Identifies effective/ ineffectiveperformance
7. Reliable
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
38/224
An Ideal PM System:
14 Characteristics (continued)
8. Valid
9. Acceptable and Fair
10.Inclusive11.Open (No Secrets)
12.Correctable
13.Standardized
14.Ethical
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
39/224
Congruent with organizational
strategy
Consistent with organizations strategy
Aligned with unit and organizational
goals
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
40/224
Thorough
All employees are evaluated
All major job responsibilities are
evaluated Evaluations cover performance for
entire review period
Feedback is given on both positive andnegative performance
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
41/224
Practical
Available
Easy to use
Acceptable to decision makers Benefits outweigh costs
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
42/224
Meaningful
Standards are important and relevant
System measures ONLY what employee cancontrol
Results have consequences Evaluations occur regularly and at
appropriate times
System provides for continuing skill
development of evaluators
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
43/224
Specific
Concrete and detailed guidance to
employees
Whats expected How to meet the expectations
Id tifi
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
44/224
Identifies
effective and ineffective
performance
Distinguish between effective and
ineffective
Behaviors
Results
Provide ability to identify employees
with various levels of performance
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
45/224
Reliable
Consistent
Free of error
Inter-rater reliability
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
46/224
Valid
Relevant (measures what is important)
Not deficient (doesnt measure
unimportant facets of job) Not contaminated (only measures what
the employee can control)
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
47/224
ACCEPTABILITY AND FAIRNESS :-
Distributive justice , which includes perception of theperformance evaluation received relative to the work
performed, and perceptions of the rewards received
relative to the evaluation received.
Procedural justice :- It includes perceptions of theprocedures used to determine the ratings as well as the
procedures used to link ratings with rewards.
Good systems are inherently disdiscriminatory.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
48/224
Acceptable and Fair
Perception of Distributive Justice Work performed Evaluation received
Reward
Perception of Procedural Justice
Fairness of procedures used to: Determine ratings
Link ratings to rewards
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
49/224
Inclusive
All participants must be given a voice inthe process of designing andimplementing the system.
Represents concerns of all involved When system is created, employees
should help with deciding What should be measured
How it should be measured
Employee should provide input onperformance prior to evaluation meeting
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
50/224
Open (No Secrets)
Frequent, ongoing evaluations and
feedback
2-way communications in appraisalmeeting
Clear standards, ongoing
communication
Communications are factual, open,
honest
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
51/224
Correctable
Recognizes that human judgment is
fallible
Appeals process provided
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
52/224
Standardized
Ongoing training of managers to
provide
Consistent evaluations across People
Time
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
53/224
Ethical
Supervisor suppresses self-interest
Supervisor rates only where she has
sufficient information about theperformance dimension
Supervisor respects employee privacy
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
54/224
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
PROCESS
There are six steps involved in the performance
management process :-1.Prerequisites
2.Performance planning3.Performance execution
4.Performance Assessment
5.Performance Review
6.Performance Renewal & Recontracting
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
55/224
Performance Management ProcessPerformance Management Process
Performance
Review
Performance
Renewal and
Recontracting
PPerformance
Assessment
P Performance
Execution
Performance
PlanningPrerequisites
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
56/224
1. Prerequisites :- There are two prerequisites that are required before a
performance management system is implemented :-
A) Knowledge of the organizations mission and strategic goals
B) Knowledge of the job in question
Strategic planning allows an organization to clearly define its purpose or reason for
existing, where it wants to be in future, the goals it wants to achieve, and the
strategies it will use to attain these goals.
The important objective of any PMS is to enhance each employees contribution tothe goals of the organization.
The second important prerequisite is to understand the job in question. This is
primarily done by job analysis.
As a result of a job analysis, we obtain information regarding the tasks carried outand the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs ) required of a particular job.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
57/224
Job descriptions are a key prerequisite for any performancemanagement system because they provide the criteria
(i.e. yardsticks) that will be used in measuring performance.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
58/224
2. Performance Planning :- In the beginning of each performancecycle, the supervisor and the employee meet to discuss , and
agree upon , what needs to be done and how it should be done.
This performance planning discussion includes a consideration of
both results and behaviors as well as a developmental plan.
Results refer to what needs to be done or the outcomes an employee
must produce. A discussion of results needs to include key
accountabilities, specific objectives for each accountability andperformance standards.
P f Pl i
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
59/224
Performance Planning:
Results
Key accountabilities
Specific objectives
Performance standards
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
60/224
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
61/224
Specific Objectives
The objectives are that the
employee will achieve as part of
each accountability.
Objectives are statements of
important and measurable
outcomes.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
62/224
Performance Standards
Yardstick to evaluate how wellemployees have achieved each
objective
Information on acceptable andunacceptable performance.
P f Pl i
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
63/224
Performance Planning:
Behaviors
How a job is done
P f Pl i
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
64/224
Performance Planning:
Competencies
Measurable clusters of KSAs
Critical in determining how results willbe achieved
Examples of competencies arecustomer service , written or oralcommunication, creative thinking anddependability
P f Pl i
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
65/224
Performance Planning:
Development Plan
Areas for improvement
Goals to be achieved in each area
of improvement
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
66/224
3. Performance Execution :- At the performance
execution stage , the following factors must be
presented :-
Employee Responsibility
Commitment to goal achievement
Ongoing performance feedback and coaching
Communication with supervisor
Collecting and sharing performance data.
Preparing for performance reviews
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
67/224
Supervisory have primary responsibility over the following
issues :-
Observation and documentation
Updates
Feedback
Resources
Reinforcement
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
68/224
EXAMPLE :- Lockheed Martin Corporation , PMS includes
the active participation of both employees and their
supervisors.
Employees write their own performance management
objectives based on organization and unit objectives. Then ,
managers approve the objectives and are encouraged to give
ongoing feedback about the progress toward meeting theobjectives.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
69/224
4. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT :- In the assessment phase, both the employee
and the manager are responsible for evaluating the extent to which the desired
behaviors have been achieved.
There are many sources to collect performance information
( e.g. peers, subordinates ), in most cases the direct supervisor provides the
information.
M lti l A t A
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
70/224
Multiple Assessments Are
Necessary
Employee involvement in the process is
used for the following purposes :-
Increase employee ownership
Increase commitment
Provide informationEnsure mutual understanding
Performance Review
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
71/224
Performance Review
Overview of Appraisal Meeting
The performance review stage involves the meeting
between the employee and the manager to review theirassessments.
Past
Behaviors and results
Present Compensation to be received
Future New goals and development plans
P f R l d
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
72/224
Performance Renewal and
Recontracting
Same as/different from Performance
Planning
Uses insights and information from
previous phases
Cycle begins again
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
73/224
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
74/224
Phase I Planning
Setting Performance Objectives
Employees and managers meet to clarify expected outcomes
for the year and set objectives that link the employees job to
department and campus objectives. Objectives define what
employees are expected to accomplish. Managers and
employees should aim to define S.M.A.R.T. objectives.
Specific
Measurable
AttainableRelevant
Timely
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
75/224
Phase II Check-In
Once performance objectives are set, managers shouldcheck in regularly with employees to discuss the status of
objectives and to provide feedback based on observations
of an employees performance. It is equally important to
provide feedback on areas of success as on those
requiring improvement.
Phase III Assessment
The performance assessment summarizes the employee's
contributions over the entire appraisal period (usually oneyear). It may occur as often as is necessary to
acknowledge the employee for accomplishments and to
plan together for improved performance
DEFINING PERFORMANCE AND CHOOSING A
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
76/224
DEFINING PERFORMANCE AND CHOOSING A
MEASUREMENT APPROACH
Performance management systems usually includemeasures of both behaviors ( what an employeedoes ) and results ( the outcomes of an employeesbehavior ). The definition of performance does notinclude the results of an employees behaviors, but
only the behaviors themselves.The characteristics of the behaviors are :-
1. Evaluative :- It means that such behaviors can bejudged as negative , neutral or positive for individualand organizational effectiveness.
2. Multidimensional :- It means that there are manydifferent kinds of behaviors that have the capacity toadvance ( or hinder ) organizational goals.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
77/224
EXAMPLE
Consider a set of behaviors that can be grouped under the
general label contribution to effectiveness of others in the
work unit.
This set of behaviors can be defined as follows :
Works with others within and outside the unit in a manner
that improves their effectiveness; shares information and
resources; develops effective working relationships: builds
consensus; constructively manages conflict.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
78/224
DETERMINANTS OF PERFORMANCE
A combination of 3 factors allows some people to perform at
higher levels than others :1.Declarative knowledge
2. Procedural knowledge
3. Motivation
Declarative knowledge is information about facts and things ,
including information regarding a given task's requirements , labels
, principles, and goals.
Procedural knowledge is a combination of knowing what to do and
how to do it and includes cognitive, physical , perceptual, motor ,
and interpersonal skills.
Motivation involves 3 types of choices
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
79/224
1. Choice to expend effort.
2. Choice of level of effort
3. Choice to persist in the expenditure of that level of efforts.
The three determinants have a multiplicative relationship,
Such that,
Performance = Declarative knowledge * Procedural knowledge*Motivation.
Deliberate practice involves the following 5 steps:-
1. Approach performance with the goal of getting better
and better.
2. While performing , focus on what is happening and why u are
Doing things the way u do.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
80/224
3. When the task is finished, seek performance feedback
from expert sources and the more sources the better.
4. Build mental models of your job, your situation andyour organization.
5. Repeat steps1-4 continually and on an ongoing basis.
IMPLICATIONS FOR ADDRESSING PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS
Performance management system need not only to measure
performance but also to provide information about the source of
any performance deficiencies.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
81/224
PERFORMANCE = declarative knowledge * Procedural knowledge * Motivation
FACTORS DETERMINING PERFORMANCE
Declarative
knowledge
Procedural
knowledge
Motivation
Facts Cognitive skill Choice to
perform
Principles Psychomotor
skill
Level to
effort
Goals Physical skill Persistenceof effort
Interpersonal
skill
PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONS
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
82/224
Performance is multidimensional .It means that there is a need to
consider many different types of behaviors to understand performance.
Two types of behaviors or performance facets stand out :
Task performance
Contextual performance
Task performance is defined as :-
Activities that transform raw materials into the goods and services that
are produces by the organization.
Activities that help with the transformation process by replenishing the
supply of raw materials , distributing its finished products, or providingimportant planning , coordination , supervising, or staff functions that
enable the organization to function effectively and efficiently.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
83/224
Contextual performance is defined as those behaviors that
contribute to the Organizations effectiveness by providing agood environment in which task performance can occur.
Contextual performance includes behaviors such as the following :-
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
84/224
Contextual performance includes behaviors such as the following :
Persisting with enthusiasm and exerting extra effort as necessary to
complete ones own task activities successfully.
Volunteering to carry out task activities that are not formally part of the job.
Helping and cooperating with others.
Following organizational rules and procedures.
Endorsing , supporting , and defending organizational objectives.
TASK PERFORMANCE CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE
VARIES FAIRLY SIMPLEROLE PRESCRIBED NO ROLE PRESCRIBED
ANTECEDENT:KSA PERSONALITY
The reasons why both task and contextual performance
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
85/224
The reasons why both task and contextual performance
dimensions should be included in performance management
System :-
1. Global competition is raising the levels of efforts required
of employees.
2. There is a need to offer outstanding customer service.
3. Many organizations are forming employees into teams.
Interpersonal cooperation is a key determinant of team
effectiveness.
4. Both task and contextual performance in the performance
management system provides an additional benefit.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
86/224
EXAMPLE :- TRW Automotive Inc., one of the worlds largest
automotive suppliers and one of the top financial performers
in the industry.The majority of the TRW behaviors actually focus on
contextual performance.
Specifically , the TRW behaviors emphasize many of the
elements of contextual performance including trust and
teamwork.
The case of O2 Ireland, Irelands second largest mobile
phone operator. Headquartered in Dublin. O2s PMS includes
Task related facets centered in hard metrics regardingproductivity as well as contextual related facets such as
involvement in staff socialization and contribution to team
Development.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
87/224
O2 concluded that this focus on both task and contextual
performance has led to higher levels of customer service andemployee satisfaction.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
88/224
Job Performance in Context
A performer
(individual or
team)
In a given
situation
Engages in
certain
behaviors
That
produce
variousresults
TRAIT BEHAVIOR RESULTS
Approaches to Measuring
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
89/224
Approaches to Measuring
Performance
Trait Approach
Emphasizes individual traits of
employees
Behavior Approach
Emphasizes how employees do the job
Results Approach
Emphasizes what employees produce
Trait Approach
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
90/224
Trait Approach
Emphasis on individual
Evaluate stable traits
Cognitive abilities Personality
Based on relationship
between traits &
performance
Trait Approach (continued)
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
91/224
Trait Approach (continued)
Appropriate if Structural changes planned for
organization
Disadvantages Improvement not under individuals
control
Trait may not lead to Desired behaviors or
Desired results
Behavior Approach
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
92/224
Behavior Approach
Appropriate if Link between behaviors and results is
not obvious
Outcomes occur in the distant future Poor results are due to causes
beyond the performers control
Not appropriate if above conditions are not present
Results Approach
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
93/224
Results Approach
Advantages: Less time
Lower cost
Data appear objective
RESULTS APPROACH
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
94/224
RESULTS APPROACH
The result approach is most appropriate under the following circumstances :-
Workers are skilled in the needed behaviors :- An emphasis on results isappropriate when workers have the necessary knowledge and skills to do the work.
Behaviors and result are obviously related :- Certain results can be
obtained only if a worker engages in certain specific behaviors.
Results show consistent improvement over time :- When results improveconsistently over time, it is an indication that workers are aware of the behaviors
needed to complete the job successfully.
There are many ways to do the right job :- When there are different ways in
which one can do the tasks required for a job, a result approach is appropriate.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
95/224
Shaping the Bell Right
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
96/224
Vitality Curve
The Normal Distribution Curve is used as tool inmeasuring human capacities, Pioneered by the
leader Jack Welch former CEO of GE
It is a differentiation tool used to assess an
employees performance and promotability Jack called it as Vitality Curve'. Also known as
- Dead mans Curve
- Forced ranking- Rank and yank
- Up or Out
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
97/224
Grading the curve
The employee force is ranked into a 20-
70-10 bucket.
Where 20 percent are rated as 'excellent
70 percent as the vital - back bone of
the company
10 percent as bottom-feeders
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
98/224
Cont..
Illustratively, it is to show appraisers that,
1. Not more than 10% should be promoted
in each department
2. Least 10% must be weeded out for low
performance;
3. The rest being rated from average, good
to very good.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
99/224
The Dead Mans Curve
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
100/224
Also referred to as 9 Block
Advantages of Vitality Curve in
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
101/224
Advantages of Vitality Curve in
PAM
It brings objectivity to the PAM process
It helps in normalization of the appraisalprocess
It lends itself to predictable performancepatterns
It guides appraisers on how to follow anuniform rating process/pattern
It helps management in planned attrition and inpredicting promotions/job enlargements/jobenrichments/rewards/incentives, etc.
C
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
102/224
Cont..
It systematically identifies high performers for
commensurate rewards and identifies low/weak
performers for training/forced attrition.
On a predictive index, it provides a bird's eye
view of the uniform, systematic performance
patterns across grades/levels/functions in the
organization.
Disadvantages of Vitality Curve in
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
103/224
Disadvantages of Vitality Curve in
PAM
It seems rigid and impractical, especially forsmall/medium. It may reduce organizationalflexibility.
It does not promote 'performance adjustments'
It makes 'extreme raters" skeptical since it doesnot allow them to rate as they wish causinganxiety or discontentment
It may be difficult to simulate/follow sinceoutstanding performers or weak performers maynot essentially be 10%-20% , year-on- year.
C t
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
104/224
Cont..
The methodology may not be easily understoodby all appraisers
Training inadequacy in appraisers may yielddisastrous results
Implementation may be difficult since HR has toensure constant compliance.
Being a 'forced-distribution' method, it may facedissent from appraisers
It may not adjust well with skill/managerialdemand-supply situations
Arguments against the use of
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
105/224
Arguments against the use of
vitality curve in PAM Unethical - Forcing a certain section of employees
every year is unethical says Praneet Mehrish, CountryHuman Resource Director, ST Microelectronics Ltd.
Subjective - Since the bell curve is applied, not acrossall the employees, but to individual department / team/ function, there is a good chance that the worst in thehigh performing group may be better than the best inan average performing group. Finally, the company may
be left with low performers, while losing some goodones, says Hari Mohan Jha, VP (HR), ITC WelcomeGroup Hotels
C t
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
106/224
Cont..
Not compatible for small teams - Logically too, such amodel cannot work for a very small group of extremelyhigh or low performers for the simple reason that itforce-fits them into predefined compartments. If itworks, it can work only for a large, randomly selectedsample, says Madhukar Shukla, Professor, XLRI
Dysfunctional work environment - Bell curve methodmay increase productivity and pave growth
opportunities for good performers, it also creates asense of fear among those who remain behind says EdLawler of Enron
B f B ll th C
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
107/224
Before you Bell the Curve..
Use objective parameters for the performanceappraisal system.
Confront the employee. There could be reasonfor his / her poor performance.
Shift the onus of improvement onto theemployee, but offer your assistance if needed.
Follow up frequently.
Finally, document all performance-related
conversations you have had with the employeein order to have important evidence on yourside if he or she contests the termination.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
108/224
Balanced Scorecard
A new approach to strategic management was
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
109/224
A new approach to strategic management was
developed in the early 1990's by Drs. Robert
Kaplan (Harvard Business School) and DavidNorton. The balanced scorecard approach
provides a clear prescription as to what
companies should measure in order to
'balance' the financial perspective.Balanced Scorecard is the Management
System that enables organisation to clarify
their vision and strategy and translate them
into action.It provides feedback on bothinternal process abd external outcomes in
order to continously improve strategic
performance and results.
Kaplan and Norton describe Balanced Scorecard
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
110/224
Kaplan and Norton describe Balanced Scorecard
as: Balanced scorecard retains traditional financial
measures. But financial measures tell the story ofpast events, an adequate story for industrial age
companies for which investments in long-term
capabilities and customer relationships were not
critical for success. These financial measures areinadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the
journey that information age companies must make
to create future value through investment in
customers, suppliers, employees, processes,technology, and innovation.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
111/224
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
112/224
Financial Perspectives
Customer
Perspectives
Learning and Growth
perspectives
Business Process
PerspectivesVision andStrategy
Explanation of the 4 perspectives
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
113/224
Explanation of the 4 perspectives
Financial Perspectives:
Revenue Growth, Profit
Cost Reduction
Productivity Improvement
Asset Utilization
Investments
Learning and Growth perspective
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
114/224
Learning and Growth perspective
Learning and growth constitute the essentialfoundation for success of any knowledge-worker organization.
Employee training and corporate cultural
attitude related to both individual andcorporate self-improvement.
It includes things like mentor and tutors,within the organization as well as ease ofcommunication among workers that allowsthem to readily get help on a problem when itis needed.
It includes technological tools highperformance work system
Learning and growth Perspective
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
115/224
Core Measurement
Enablers
Staff
Competencies
Technology
InfrastructureClimate of
Action
Results
Employee
Retention
Employee
Productivity
Employee
Satisfaction
Business Process Perspective
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
116/224
p
Critical internal process in which organization must deal. Theseprocesses enable to deliver the value propositions to customersand satisfy stake holders expectations.
Innovation Process
- Product Design
- Product Development
- Process Implementation Operating Process
- Manufacturing
- Marketing
- After Sale Service
Customer Perspective
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
117/224
Customer Perspective
Due to increasing realization of customerfocused and customer satisfaction in any
organization therefore developing the metrics
for satisfaction customers should be analyzed
in terms of kind of customers and kind ofprocesses for which we are providing a
product or service to those customers groups.
In todays business scenario Customer is the
king
Customer perspective
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
118/224
Customer Satisfaction
Customer Retention
New Customer Acquisition
Customer Profitability
Market Share
Measures of value Proposition to customer
- Short Lead Time
- On Time Delivery
- Innovative Products
- Anticipating Needs
Customer Perspective Core Measure
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
119/224
Customer Perspective Core Measure
Market Share
CustomerProfitability
Customer
Satisfaction
CustomerAcquisition
CustomerRetention
Summary
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
120/224
Summary
FinancialPerspective
Customer
Perspective
Internal
Process
Learning and
Growth
Revenue
CustomerLoyalty
On TimeDelivery
Process QualityProcess Cycle
Time
Employee Competitiveness
SL.NO. PERSPECTIVE MEASURES
1 FINANCIAL * Return on Investment
* Revenue per employee
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
121/224
2 CUSTOMER *Customer Satisfaction
*Customer Loyalty
* Total cost to customer
* Price relative to competition
* Hours spent with customer
*Market Share
3INTERNAL PROCESS
* Response time (From Reception to Bed)* Quality of services rendered.
* Bill Processing time
* Bill Processing accuracy
*Cost of unutilized capacity.
4 LEARNING & GROWTH * Absenteeism
* Turnover rate* Employee Productivity
* Training Hours
* Leadership Development
* Percentage of employees with advanced degrees.
* Average years of service
* Number of cross-trained employees
* Internal communication rating
Challenges in Executing Strategy
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
122/224
Challenges in Executing Strategy
Financial Management
ToolsBalance Sheets
Income Statements
Statement of Cash Flow
People Management
Tools
MBOTraining Programs
HRIS
360 Feedback
Customer Management
ToolsC R M
Customer Segment AnalysisCustomer Surveys
Process Management
ToolsSix Sigma
Supply Chain Management
TQMStrategy Management
Tools
???
The Balanced Scorecard
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
123/224
Train and Communicate Strategy
The Balanced Scorecard
Set goals, select performance measures and linkmeasures to incentives
Set target for each goal and re-deploy resources to
activities and initiatives to achieve targets
Provide feedback on performance and
learn from results
Feed
Forward
Learning
The Balanced Scorecard
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
124/224
The Balanced Scorecard
A robust tool but keep it simple!
Makes strategy tangible everyones job!
Tracks whats important hits and misses
Measurement-lead management
Provides feedback for short-term course
corrections and long-term learning
Balanced Scorecard Perspectives
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
125/224
Balanced Scorecard Perspectives
A. Financial
How do we succeed financially?
B.B. CustomerCustomer
How do we appear to our customers?
C.C. Internal ProcessInternal ProcessAt what processes must we excel?
D.D. Learning and GrowthLearning and GrowthHow do we sustain our ability to change and grow?
We Use the Scorecard to Articulate Strategic
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
126/224
Knowledge, Skills, Systems, and ToolsKnowledge, Skills, Systems, and Tools
FinancialFinancialResultsResults
To Build the Strategic Capabilities..
Needed to Deliver UniqueSets of Benefits to Customers...
To Drive FinancialSuccess...
And Realizethe Vision
Equip our People...
InternalInternal
CapabilitiesCapabilities
CustomerBenefits
Hypotheses in Cause-effect Terms
Balanced Scorecard Perspectives
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
127/224
Balanced Scorecard Perspectives
How do we Objectives Measures Targets Init iatives
appear to our
Stockholders?
inancial
How do we Objectives Measures Targets Initiatives
appear to our
Customers?
sto erAt what internal Objectives Measures Targets Initiatives
processes must
we excel?
nternal B siness ProcessVision
&
Strategy
How do we Objectives Measures Targets Initiatives
sustain our
ability to change
& grow?
earning and ro t
Cascading Scorecards
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
128/224
to Build Alignment
Organization
Business
Unit
Business
Unit
BusinessUnit
Teams
Individual Contributors
Sound Long-Term
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
129/224
FinancialSoundFiscalMgmt
BudgetingLong-TermInvestment
Strategy
Customer The Value
Proposition
Internal Process
Learning & Growth
The Value Proposition
Product/ServicesPrice SelectionQuality Availability
RelationshipPartnershipServices
BrandImage
InnovationNew learningPartnerships
Future needs
Operational ExcellenceAdmin excellenceNetwork of supplier for
Products & servicesAdaptability
Customer MgmtDeepen Knowledgeabout customer
AttractRetainGrow Relationship
Climate for ActionPersonal Growth
CompetenciesFunctional ExcellenceLeadership SkillsStrategic Readiness
Scorecard Information
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
130/224
Information Type Are. Example is
Strategies High Level Goals Increase Market Share
Objectives Measures of actionplans
Increase CustomerSatisfaction
Measures Indicates success or
failure
Average Customer Rating
(scale of 1-10)
Targets Desired level of
performance for ameasure
Achieve 9.9 of 10 Average
Customer Rating
Initiatives Management actions
taken to achieve target
Train CSR Staff in Problem
Resolution Skills
Perspective: Financial / Customer / Internal Process / Learning&Growth
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
131/224
The TCS Model
Source: Human Capital Vol.9 No.12 May 2006 Redefine the HR Agenda
Vision
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
132/224
Vision
Global Top 10 by 2010 in the IT Industry
Mission Customer delight by providing best-in-
class consulting, IT solutions & services
and also delivering value and joy to all
stakeholders.
Shareholder
ValueFINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
133/224
Human Capital
Effectiveness
Human Resource
Efficiency
Employee
delight
Customer
delight
Manage Operating
efficiency
Manage Customer
relationships
Deliver world
class services
Team
Integration
Leadership
Competencie
sCultural Climate
Strategic Alignment
/Motivation
Work Capability
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE
INTERNAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE
LEARNING & GROWTH PERSPECTIVE
Keys to Success
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
134/224
Keys to Success
Educate your Executive and Teams
Devise the right metrics
Follow through to completion
Start smallsmall! Report immediately
Dont over measure
Getting Started Customize Your BSC
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
135/224
Getting Started Customize Your BSC
1. Describe the strategy burningplatform?
Strategy Map
2. Measure the strategy Develop the measures; critical data points
3. Manage the strategy
Gather detailed information about themeasure and initiative
The Successful Scorecard
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
136/224
The Successful Scorecard
Is a dynamic process
continues to set higher targets and achieves them
Define jobs strategically
from the perspective of where it fits in with thestrategic business goals
Supports joint decision
making about what you do/dont do based on
strategic goals
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
137/224
Questions?
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
138/224
PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL METHODS
What to Evaluate?
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
139/224
Traits Measures Are an assessment of what the employee is, not
what the employee actually does.
Behavior-based measures
Focus on what an employee does and what theemployee should do differently.
Results-based measures
Focus is on accomplishments or outcomes that can
be measured objectively. Problems occur when
results measures are difficult to obtain, outside
employee control, or ignore the means by which
the results were obtained.
How to Evaluate?
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
140/224
How to Evaluate?
Relative Assessment
Employees are measured against other
employees and ranked on their distance from
the next higher to the next lower performing
employee.
Absolute Measurement
Employees are all measured strictly byabsolute performance requirements or
standards of their jobs.
Comparative
Ranking
P i d C i
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
141/224
Appraisal
Methods
Paired Comparison
Forced Distribution Absolute
Critical Incident
Narrative Essay
Checklist Graphic Rating Scale (GRS)
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales
(BARS)
Behavioral Observation Scales (BOS) Forced Choice
Objectives
Management By Objectives (MBO)
COMPARATIVE METHODS
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
142/224
COMPARATIVE METHODS
Ranking
Alternation Ranking
Paired Comparison
Forced Distribution
Alternation ranking
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
143/224
g
ADVANTAGES
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
144/224
Its advantages include ease of administration and
explanation.
DISADVANTAGES
The how and why u have rated A better than B is not
questioned.
There is no attempt to fractionalize what is being appraised
into component elements.
It is subject to the halo and recency effects.
PAIRED COMPARISON METHOD
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
145/224
The paired comparison method is a systematic method
where each employee is compared with all other employeesin the group, for each trait, one at a time.
PAIRED COMPARISON:
For the trait Creativity
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
146/224
For the trait Creativity
_+++EESHWAR
+_++DILIP
_++_CHARLES
____BHAVANA
__++ARUP
EESHWARDILIPCHARLES
BHAVANA
ARUP
MERITS
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
147/224
Simplest method
Need no specialist knowledge or skill
Complete ranking of all employees
Demerits
Time consuming and cumbersome for appraisers.
Suitable for small organization with limited number of
employees.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
148/224
FREE ESSAY
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
149/224
It is a narrative appraisal method and is
based on absolute standards
It describes an employee's actions ratherthan indicating an actual rating
The intent is to allow the rater more flexibility
than other rating methods do.
The Process
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
150/224
A job is broken up into various general
dimensions. Each dimension is followed by
some space where the rater has to write an
essay on that dimension
These essays concentrate on performance
strengths and weaknesses, identify
developmental needs and also suggest courses
of remedial action These essays can either be composed alone or
in collaboration with the appraisee
Narrative Forms
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
151/224
Final appraisalsare frequentlywritten in a
narrative form Supervisor rates
employee bydescribing thebehaviour relatedto each factor
The appraiser takes note of these factors :-
1 Job knowledge and skills exhibited by the appraisee
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
152/224
1. Job knowledge and skills exhibited by the appraisee
while performing his job.
2. Appraisees relationship with other employees and Manager.
3. Appraisees personality traits and attitude toward his job, peers
, manager and the organization.
4. Appraisees understanding and commitment to organizations
goals and objectives; and
5. Appraisees potential for future organizational roles.
MERITS
1 M l d l ti f l k d f
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
153/224
1. More closed evaluations of employees work and performance.
2. Employee performance and work behaviors are documentedin detail.
3.Facilitates design of performance improvement programme
with ease given ready availability of performance records.
DEMERITS
1. Incorrect sentence construction can give a different
impression.
2. Maintaining a diary for noting performance of employees
on regular basis increases cost of supervision and reduced
time for performing critical managerial activities.
3. Honesty of appraiser in recording and reporting employee
performance is central to the effectiveness of this method.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
154/224
CRITICAL INCIDENT METHOD
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
155/224
Critical incidents are behaviors that result in goodor poor job performance.
The rater records all such incidents and the
ratees involvement in it.
The rater plays the role ofObserver rather than
Judge.
For eg.I saw Mishra closing the steam line valve at
the instant the pipeline burst. We could save a
lot of lives due to the above factor.
The critical incident method makes the supervisor think about
the subordinates appraisal all during the year
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
156/224
(so the rating does not reflect the employees most recent
performance).
The critical incident method provides the list which has
numerous examples of what specifically the subordinate
can do to eliminate deficiencies.
The downsize of this method is that without numerical rating ,
this method is not too useful for comparing employees or for
salary decision.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
157/224
ADVANTAGES
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
158/224
1. The evaluation is based on actual job behavior. The approach
has descriptions in support of particular ratings of an employee.
2. Job related feedback to the ratee is also easy.
3. It also reduces the recency bias, if raters record incident
throughout the rating period.
4. This approach can increase the chances that the subordinate
will improve because they learn more precisely what is
expected of them.
LIMITATIONS
1 Negative incidents are generally more noticeable than
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
159/224
1.Negative incidents are generally more noticeable than
positive ones.
2. The recording of incidents is a chore to the supervisor and
may be put off and easily forgotten.
3. Overly close supervision may result.
4. Managers may unload a series of complaints about
incidents during an annual performance review session.
CHECKLIST & WEIGHTED
CHECKLIST
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
160/224
CHECKLIST
This method requires the rater to select
statements or words that describe the
employees performance or characteristics.
Checklists consist of groups of statements that
pertain to a given job.
Raters check statements most representative
of the characteristics and performance of anemployee.
STEPS IN CONSTRUCTIONGenerate a large no of beha io ral
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
161/224
Generate a large no. of behavioural
statements relevant to work These should represent all levels of
effectiveness
Rules to follow
Express only one thought per statement
Use understandable terminology
Eliminate double negatives
Express thoughts simply and clearly
MERITS
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
162/224
1. It is economical.
2. It is easy to do the administration.3. The rater doesn't require much of the training.
4. It is standardized.
DISADVANTAGES
1. It doesn't allow the rater to give up relative ratings
2. The use of improper weights.
3. Misinterpretations of checklist items.
When points are allotted to the checklist , the technique
becomes a weighted checklist.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
163/224
GRAPHIC RATING SCALE
(GRS)
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
164/224
(GRS)In a Graphic Rating Scale, the rater assesses a
ratee on performance-related characteristics and
personality characteristics,
ie. factors like quantity of work, dependability, job
knowledge, cooperativeness, ability to lead,
interpersonal skills, etc. by using a rating scale.
A graphic rating lists traits ( such as quality and reliability ) and
a range of performance values ( from unsatisfactory
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
165/224
to outstanding ) for each trait.
The supervisor rates each subordinate by circling or checking
the score that best describes his or her performance for each
trait. The assigned values for the traits are then totaled.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
166/224
Issues in constructing GRS
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
167/224
Selecting the characteristics to evaluate
Deciding the number of points on the scale
Scaling the characteristics
Providing descriptions for each criteria andeach point on the scale
MERITS
1 It is easy to use
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
168/224
1. It is easy to use.
2. It is easy to understand3. Many employees can be evaluated.
DEMERIT
1. The rater can be biased.2. There is an implication that a high score on one factor
can compensate for a low factor on another.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
169/224
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
170/224
FORCED CHOICE SCALE
What is the Forced Choice Method
?
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
171/224
?
A rating technique specially designed to increaseobjectivity and to decrease biasing factors inratings.
It comprises of the use of statements that aregrouped into sets according to certain statisticalproperties.
Rater is forced to select from each group of
statements a subset (usually 2) of thosestatements that are most descriptive of eachratee.
For eg.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
172/224
Aim of lesson is clearly presented Repeats questions to whole class before
answering
Conducts class in orderly manner
At ease before class
Is patient with slow learners
Lectures with confidence Keeps interest and attention of class
Acquaints class with lesson objective inadvance
Forced-Choice Format
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
173/224
Items for forced-choice scales are arrangedaccording to two statistical properties of each of
the statement.
Favourability Index (FI)
Discriminability Index (DI)
Discriminability Index DI
Favorability Index - FI
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
174/224
y
FI = Indicates the extent to which a statement
reflects the niceness, attractiveness, orsocial
desirabilityof the behaviour or characteristic it
describes.
DI = Reflects the extent to which a statement
describes a behaviour or a characteristic that
distinguishes superior employees from others.
Forced Choice Scale
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
175/224
A tetrad of four statements is provided
In the tetrad all the 4 statements have equal
favourability
2 statements have significantly greater
discriminating power than the other 2.
DI & FISTATEMENT DI FI
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
176/224
At ease before class 0.53 2.35
Conducts class in orderly manner 1.20 2.22
Repeats questions to whole class before
answering0.57 2.29
Aim of lesson is clearly presented 1.14 2.38
STATEMENT DI FI
Is patient with slow learners 1.15 2.82
Lectures with confidence 0.54 2.75
Keeps interest and attention of class 1.39 2.89
Acquaints class with lesson objective in
advance0.79 2.85
Advantages of the method
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
177/224
Difficulty in deliberately distorting ratings in
favor of or against particular individuals
because raters have no idea which statements
of each group will ultimately result in higher (or
lower) ratings.
Research has proved that ratings from thismethod were a more valid measure of real
worth than ratings from other formats usedearlier.
Why is it not popular among
raters?
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
178/224
Raters prefer other methods as with this method
they cannot determine whether they are rating
their best people high or their worst people low. Inability to make an evaluation or a direct rating
can be frustrating to raters.
ASSESSMENT CENTRE METHOD
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
179/224
This method is used to test candidates in social situation,using a variety of procedures and number of assessors. The
most important feature of the assessment centre is job
related simulations.
Assessment centers are used for the following purposes:-
1. To measure the potential for first level supervisors, sales
and upper management positions, and also for higher
levels of management for development purposes.
2. To determine the individual training and development needs
of employees.
3. To select recent college students for entry level positions.
4. To make an early determination of potential.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
180/224
4. To make an early determination of potential.
6. To assist in implementing affirmative action goals.
MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT CENTRES
A management assessment centre is a two to three day
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
181/224
simulation in which 10 to 12 candidates perform realistic
management tasks under the observation of experts whoappraise each candidates leadership potential.
Typical simulated exercise include :-
The in- basket
Leaderless group discussion
Management games
Individual presentations
Objective testsThe interview
DEMERITS
1. Assessment centers are costly.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
182/224
y
2. Assessment centre staff are often influenced by subjective
elements such as personality of the candidates.
3. The approach involves real hazards i.e. examination
taking syndrome.
4. Employees who receive a poor report from the centre may
react in negative ways.
A well conducted assessment centre can and does achieve
better forecasts of future performance and progress than other
methods of appraisal.
The reliability, content validity , and predictive are said to behigh in the assessment centers.
BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED
RATING SCALES (BARS)
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
183/224
Developed by Patricia Cain Smith and LorneKendall
A series of continuous graphic rating scales
arranged vertically
Behavioural descriptions exemplifying various
degrees of each dimensions serve as anchors
on the scale
Designed to allow superiors to be morecomfortable while giving feedback
BARS Dimension:Quality of GroupBARS Dimension:Quality of Group
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
184/224
y p
Member Input
y p
Member Input
Group member does little work and offersno valuable ideas or feedback
Effective
Ineffective
Group member has read all agreed-uponMaterial and gives valuable ideas.
Group member participates in discussions,though not always prepared
5
4
3
2
1
Group member has read some agreed-upon material
Group member does not attend any meeting
The Steps in BARS development
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
185/224
GENERATE CRITICAL INCIDENTS :Ask
persons who know the job (job holders,
supervisors) to describe specific illustrations of
effective and ineffective performance.
DEVELOP PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONS :
Have them cluster the incidents into a smaller
set of 5 or 10 performance dimensions, and
define each dimension.
The Steps in BARS development
(contd.)
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
186/224
REALLOCATE INCIDENTS :Another group ofpeople who also know the job then reallocate
the original critical incidents.
They get the cluster definitions and the critical
incidents in a jumbled manner
They reassign each incident to the cluster they think
it fits best.
A
critical incident is retained if some percentage(usually 50% to 80%) of this second group assigns it
to the same cluster as did the first group.
The Steps in BARS development
(contd.)
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
187/224
SCALE THE INCIDENTS : the second group
then rates the behavior described by the
incident as to how effectively or ineffectively it
represents performance on the dimension ( 7-to 9-point scales are typical)
DEVELOP A FINAL INSTRUMENT : choose
about 6 or 7 of the incidents as the dimensions
behavioral anchors.
ADVANTAGES :- While more time consuming than other
appraisal tools, BARS seems to have some advantages :-
1 A more accurate gauge :- People who know and do the job
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
188/224
1. A more accurate gauge :- People who know and do the job
and its requirements better than anyone develop the BARS.This should produce a good gauge of job performance.
2. Clearer standards :- The critical incidents along the scale
make clear what to look for in terms of superior performance, average
performance , and so forth.
3. Feedback :- The critical incidents make it easier to explain the ratings
to appraises.
4. Independent dimensions :- Systematically clustering the critical
incidents into five or six performance should help to make theperformance dimensions more independent of one another.
5. Consistency :- BARS based evaluation seem to be relatively reliable
, in that different raters appraisals of that same person tend to be
similar.
Disadvantages
1 A specific deficiency is that the behaviors used are activity
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
189/224
1. A specific deficiency is that the behaviors used are activity
oriented rather than results oriented.
2.It is time consuming and expensive to create BARS.
MANAGEMENT BY
OBJECTIVES
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
190/224
The use of Management By Objectives was first
widely advocated in the 1950s by the noted
management theorist Peter Drucker.
MBO methods of performance appraisal are
results-oriented i.e., they seek to measure
employee performance by examining the extent
to which predetermined work objectives have
been met.
In the 90s, Peter Drucker put the significance of this organization
management method into perspective, when he said: "It's just another tool.
It is not the great cure for management inefficiency... Management by
Objectives works if you know the objectives 90% of the time you don't
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
191/224
Objectives works if you know the objectives, 90% of the time you don t
Management by objectives (MBO) is a systematic and organized approach
that allows management to focus on achievable goals and to attain the
best possible results from available resources.
It aims to increase organizational performance by aligning goals and
subordinate objectives throughout the organization. Ideally, employees get
strong input to identify their objectives, time lines for completion, etc. MBO
includes ongoing tracking and feedback in the process to reach objectives.
Management by Objectives (MBO) was first outlined by Peter Drucker in
1954 in his book 'The Practice of Management'.
Tohelp protectyour privacy, PowerPointprevented thisexternalpicturefrom being automatically downloaded. Todownload and display thispicture, click Optionsin theMessageBar, and then click Enableexternalcontent.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
192/224
1. Develop overall organizational
goals
MBO PROCESS
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
193/224
2. Establish specific goals for variousdepartments subunits and individuals
3. Formulate action plans
4. Implement plans and maintain self-control
5. Review progress periodically
6.Appraise performance
1. Develop overall organizational Goals: - The first step in the
process of MBO in an organization is to establish verifiable
objectives which are based on the mission and vision of the
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
194/224
organization . These are the strategic goals which are set bythe top management and address the targets to be achieved
by the whole organization.
2. Establish specific goals or objects for various Departments
and Individuals: - The goals are set for the various positionsat various levels. In this stage the superiors formulate the
objectives that they plan to achieve in their own department.
Most of the times the organization follow the top down
approach just described, some organizations even go for
the bottom up approach, in which goals are suggested by
the lower levels what they believe they can achieve.
3.Formulate Action Plans: - An action plan describes what is
to be done, where, when, how and by whom to achieve the
objectives. Action plan helps in accessing the feasibility of
hi i th l S b di t ll d l th l
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
195/224
achieving the goals. Subordinates usually develop themselve
with the support of their supervisors.
4.Implement and maintain self- control :- When the goals are
set and action plans determined , individuals should be
given enough freedom to carry out their activities. Butsupervisors need to be kept informed about the progress and
any difficulty that arise.
5.Review Progress Periodically: - MBO ensures periodic
meetings between the superiors and the subordinates toreview the progress towards the accomplishment of targets
of the subordinate. It is important that the plans are
implemented and the targets will be achieved.
6.Appraise Performance :- The appraisal focuses on what
extent the goals are achieved as well as on the shortfalls .
It also ponder what are the reasons of not accomplishing
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
196/224
the expected goals and what measures can be taken toovercome them.
Goals and plans for the next cycle may also be discussed
at this point.
Strengths of MBO
MBO aids in planning by making managers establish their
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
197/224
own goals.
MBO helps in Improving the communication between both
management and employees, because both can express their
views on what objectives they can and cannot accomplish.
MBO helps in making everybody aware of the organization's
goals.
With MBO the evaluation process becomes fairer
because people are measured on specified targets and
their performance in achieving goals of the organization.
With specific objectives laid out, suggestions from all levels
of management can be obtained.
M ill h l id f th it l f th i
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
198/224
Managers will have clearer idea of the vital areas of their
responsibility and the standards that are required. Hence,
allowing them to focus and utilize their resources.
MBO creates a participatory work environment to help
employees become more involved. In this way, everysubordinate in the organization is more motivated.
It provides a practical approach to analyze training needs
and opportunities for growth on the basis of measurement of
performance against standards.
Weaknesses
MBO process requires too much time, effort and paperwork
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
199/224
in setting goals, objectives and energy to implement thewhole system effectively.
Some managers set unrealistic objectives, placing pressure
for performance at the expense of employees.
Generally the main barrier to effective MBO is lack of
support from top-management, and it is easily stalled by
authoritarian managers.
Before MBO can be implemented, many changes have to be done in the
organization, including the control procedures and the general style of the
management.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
200/224
The support needed to achieve goal achievement is too often not enoughfor some managers. managers may be inadequately trained to set goals
and coach employees when necessary.
It is difficult to establish measurable objectives for certain jobs.
There is too much emphasis on short term performance and losing sightof long-term objectives.
It is may be used by some supervisors as a control devise that intimidates
rather than motivates subordinates.
It may tend to introduce inflexibility in the organization.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
201/224
360 Degree Feedback System
A 360- degree feedback, system collects performance
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
202/224
g , y p
information from multiple parties including ones subordinatesPeers, supervisor and customers and self. These systems are
called 360 degree systems because information is gathered
from individuals all around the employee.
In 360 degree appraisal a gap analysis is conducted to
examine the areas for which there are large discrepancies
between self perceptions and the perceptions of others.
The 360- degree feedback system is most helpful when it isused for developmental purposes only and not for
administrative purposes.
360 degree make them aware of that there is a problem with
a competency is a very good first step, but a good 360- degree
feed back system also provides concrete suggestions
about what to do to improve competencies.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
203/224
about what to do to improve competencies.
360 degree feedback systems are not necessarily beneficial
for all individuals and organizations.
Example :- Individuals who are high on self efficacy are more
likely to improve their performance based on feedbackreceived from peers compared to individuals low on
self efficacy.
The effect of receiving feedback from multiple sources is
most beneficial for individuals who perceive there is a need
to change their behavior , react positively to feedback,believe change is feasible, set appropriate goals to improve
their performance, and take concrete actions that lead to
performance improvement.
In terms of organizational characteristics , 360 degree system
Work best in organizations that have cultures that support
open and honest feedback.
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
204/224
These systems work best in organizations that have
participatory , as opposed to authoritarian , leadership style in
which giving and receiving feedback is the norm and is
regarded as valuable.
Example :- Patent Office of UK
The most comprehensive type of multi-source feedback is
360-degree feedback, which involves an employees customer
, peer, direct reports, self and manager.
The other degrees are represented
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
205/224
The other degrees are represented
Peer/Co-workers Manager
Customer Direct
Reports/Subordinates
Extent of multi-source feedback
Organizations often choose the source of feedback based
on the criticality of performance interaction. This is also based
on the strategy and values of the organization. IBM, for
example, opts to use customer feedback as opposed to usingall sources to provide additional inputs. In an organization
where teamwork may be critical, the inputs of peers often
Become necessary and are used extensively.
90 (Assessment by manager) Most companies with a
performance management system in place use this mode of
Feedback
8/8/2019 PMCMfinal-224
206/224
180 (Assessment by manager and peer) Tata Communications
ICICI
Coca Cola
270 (Assessment by manager, peer and direct report)
Wipro InfoTech
360 (Assessment by manager, peer, direct report and customer)
ITC
EXAMPLE
360 system, designed for employ