Plutopia Project

BUDAPESTI MŰSZAKI ÉS GAZDASÁGTUDOMÁNYI EGYETEM

BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS

SCIENCE WITHOUT BORDERS PROGRAMME

PLANNING LAND USE

AND TRANSPORT OPTIONS

URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

PLUTOPIA SIMULATION

ASHTON CÉSAR OLIVEIRA

IGOR JOSÉ RIBEIRO

TIAGO LEVI CARDOSO

Fall, 2014

Table of Contents OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................ 3

ADOPTED POLITICS ................................................................................................................ 3

CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3

BUS LANES AND BUS SERVICES ....................................................................................... 3

PARKING MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................... 3

TRAFFIC CALMING AND SAFETY ....................................................................................... 3

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND RESTRAINT ....................................................................... 3

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ................................................................................................. 4

MAINTENANCE EXPEDITURE ............................................................................................. 4

FINANCIAL DECISIONS ........................................................................................................ 4

YEAR #1 .................................................................................................................................... 4

YEAR #2 .................................................................................................................................. 14

ROAD PRICING CALCULATION ......................................................................................... 14

YEAR #3 .................................................................................................................................. 25

YEAR #4 .................................................................................................................................. 36

YEAR #5 .................................................................................................................................. 47

CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 59

3

OBJECTIVES

Given the initial conditions of Plutopia, the mayor and the ministers of finance and

transportation & environment have set the following main objectives (Table 1).

Area Main Objective

Environment Reduce pollution levels

Finances Guarantee the business development in the city

Politics Keep political approval for re-election

Transportation Increase the use of public transportation

Table 1 - Main Objectives in Plutopia Administration

The chosen approach was to use road pricing to decrease the modal split for car in the peak

hours, and to provide quality and cheap bus service, along with shifting of the development to

the outer zones. The indexes which are going to be evaluated are: average generalized cost of

trips by car (AGC-car-p), average generalized cost of non-car owners’ trips by bus (AGC-nco-

p), total fatalities (cas-fatal), value of index of business confidence (confindex), mode split for

car (mscar-p) and share of vote in election (vote).

ADOPTED POLITICS

CONSTRUCTION

Investments to increase the capacity of Link 5 in order to have a better flow of vehicles to the

outer links.

BUS LANES AND BUS SERVICES

Bus lanes will be used to improve speed of bus traffic, thus making public transportation more

attractive to people. Peak only, in the beginning, than all day.

PARKING MANAGEMENT

Since long-stay parking encourage the use of cars, higher parking fees will be applied.

TRAFFIC CALMING AND SAFETY

Gradually, investments in traffic safety and education will be funded.

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND RESTRAINT

Road pricing will be used as main (and only) method of traffic restraint, being effective to the

increase in costs of car trips.

4

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL

Restriction to certain developments per zone will be used for flux control.

MAINTENANCE EXPEDITURE

Annually investments are made to ensure the quality of the roads.

FINANCIAL DECISIONS

Higher taxes will be used to increase revenue, but later reduced as a populist measure. Money

transfers between capital and current accounts are essential.

YEAR #1

In order to have financial conditions to afford the initial cost of installing Road Price, the first

year was focused on gathering enough money. Therefore, the domestic taxes were raised to

20$ per head, and he commercial taxes were set to 420$ per 100 square meters, long-stay

parking fees were raised by 10%, and all active construction projects were shelved. Due to

slow speeds, bus lanes were installed on links 3, 4 and 5 (the first one works peak-only). On

proposit of reduce center links traffic, the land use for new properties was restricted in such

way to shift industrial development to the outer links, as seen in Error! Reference source not

found., creating a “brown zone”. All the available amount of money was transferred to the

capital account, in order to preserve money enough to the Road Pricing system installation.

Zone % Houses % Shops % Industry

1-6 50 50 0 7 50 50 30 8 50 50 50 9 40 50 80

10 30 50 90

After these decisions we had got the following report.

PEAK HOUR - INBOUND TRAFFIC PER SECTOR

LINK CAPACITY FLOWS SPEED

VEH. BUSES CARS BUSES CARS BUSES

1 2500 0 2567 19 10 10

2 2300 0 2696 19 9 7

3 2090 900 2934 19 7 10

4 2090 900 3404 19 6 9

5 2375 900 2956 19 10 8

5

6 2500 0 2636 19 13 7

7 2900 0 2330 19 18 7

8 3000 0 1800 19 23 9

9 2400 0 944 19 28 10

CC 1 2400 1507 5 23 14

CC 2 2600 1483 2 24 15

- OUTBOUND TRAFFIC PER SECTOR



1 2500 0 833 19 22 6

2 2300 0 282 19 26 10

3 2090 900 207 19 29 12

4 2090 900 660 19 29 15

5 2375 900 559 19 32 16

6 2500 0 600 19 32 24

7 2900 0 768 19 31 25

8 3000 0 702 19 32 26

9 2400 0 344 19 33 30

CC 1 2400 1507 5 23 14

CC 2 2600 1483 2 24 15

final RUN NO. 1

MORNING PEAK HOUR TRIP ENDS (HOME BASED)

ZONE ORIGINS DESTINATIONS MODE SPLIT

CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 1406 708 33991 0.54 0.12

II 3615 1041 19859 0.61 0.14

III 5759 1796 10640 0.63 0.12

IV 8248 2293 5860 0.65 0.10

V 11158 2284 5949 0.66 0.12

VI 11907 1752 6078 0.69 0.08

VII 13701 1558 5915 0.69 0.07

VIII 14564 904 7670 0.70 0.06

IX 11839 798 6305 0.70 0.05

X 12497 411 5972 0.71 0.04

TOTAL 94694 13546 108240 0.63 0.10

6

PEAK PERIOD TRIP CHARACTERISTICS

CAR BUS USER WALKER ALL

USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.65 3.62 3.25 0.81 3.32

AV IN-VEH-TIME / LEG

(MINS) 17.50 21.92 18.98 18.56

AV EXCESS TIME / LEG

(MINS) 2.44 14.63 14.63 10.13 5.73

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.10 0.59 0.56 0.22

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 3.12 8.35 5.94 2.39 4.26

THOUSANDS OF TRIPS /

DAY 68 20 9 11 108

THOUSANDS OF PAX. KM 248 73 29 9 360

final RUN NO. 1

OFF-PEAK HOUR - INBOUND TRAFFIC PER SECTOR



1 2500 0 1541 9 16 16

2 2300 0 1598 9 17 12

3 2200 0 1662 9 17 10

4 2090 900 2078 9 13 10

5 2375 900 1749 9 20 9

6 2500 0 1441 9 23 10

7 2900 0 1184 9 27 10

8 3000 0 922 9 30 11

9 2400 0 481 9 31 12

CC 1 2400 979 2 28 17

CC 2 2600 525 1 32 19




1 2500 0 407 9 23 7

7

2 2300 0 139 9 27 11

3 2200 0 115 9 29 16

4 2090 900 499 9 29 16

5 2375 900 390 9 32 17

6 2500 0 320 9 32 25

7 2900 0 344 9 32 27

8 3000 0 353 9 32 28

9 2400 0 179 9 33 31

CC 1 2400 979 2 28 17

CC 2 2600 525 1 32 19

final RUN NO. 1

MORNING OFF-PEAK HOUR TRIP ENDS (HOME BASED)


CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 675 415 15741 0.64 0.11

II 1736 610 8211 0.64 0.14

III 2765 1053 4418 0.65 0.13

IV 3959 1345 3122 0.66 0.10

V 5356 1339 3313 0.66 0.12

VI 5716 1027 3432 0.67 0.09

VII 6577 913 3463 0.68 0.07

VIII 6991 530 4153 0.67 0.06

IX 5683 468 3736 0.68 0.05

X 5999 241 3812 0.68 0.04

TOTAL 45458 7943 53401 0.66 0.10

OFF-PEAK PERIOD TRIP CHARACTERISTICS


USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.60 3.82 3.45 0.80 3.34


(MINS) 11.88 17.41 15.27 13.14


(MINS) 2.40 18.43 18.43 10.03 6.29

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.01 0.28 0.27 0.08

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 2.23 8.16 5.75 2.37 3.45

8


DAY 351 77 53 53 534


final RUN NO. 1

PARKING REPORT

ZONE PNR PUBLIC PUBLIC CHARGE CONGESTION

SPACES SPACES PARKING $/HR

LONG STAY

I 7000 6000 5047 0.25 ****

II 5500 5000 3550 0.10

III 4500 3500 777 0.07

IV 3500 2500 481 0.07

V 2750 2500 518 0.07

VI 3000 2500 1633 0.00

SHORT STAY

I 8000 7000 37820 0.00

II 5000 4500 5940 0.20

III 5000 4500 3290 0.10

IV 3500 2000 6010 0.00

V 2500 2000 7610 0.00

VI 2500 2000 7790 0.00

TOTAL REV $/DY = 14118 (LONG STAY) 2275 (SHORT STAY)

PUBLIC TRANSPORT REPORT

COMMERCIAL IMPLEMENTED

PEAK OFF-PEAK PEAK OFF-PEAK

FREQUENCY PER HOUR 19 9 19 9

FIXED FARE PART ($) 0.3000 0.1300 0.3000 0.1300

VARIABLE FARE PART ($/KM) 0.0800 0.0400 0.0800 0.0400

COST (K$) TO THE CITY 0 0

BUS FLEET 224 77

9

final RUN NO. 1

MEASURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE

LINK NOISE PARTICLES CO DAYTIME

P OP P OP P OP INDEX

1 3.6 3.0 3.7 2.9 3.8 3.0 3.1

2 3.4 2.7 3.3 2.6 3.4 2.6 2.8

3 3.3 2.6 3.2 2.4 3.3 2.5 2.6

4 3.5 2.7 3.4 2.6 3.6 2.7 2.8

5 3.3 2.5 2.9 2.2 3.1 2.3 2.4

6 3.1 2.2 2.6 1.8 2.7 1.9 2.1

7 3.0 1.9 2.3 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.8

8 2.6 1.6 1.8 1.1 1.9 1.2 1.4

9 1.8 1.0 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.9

RR 1 2.6 2.2 2.2 1.8 2.4 2.0 2.1

RR 2 1.7 1.0 1.3 0.9 1.6 0.9 1.0

LOCAL 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3

CITY 2.6 2.0 2.3 1.9 2.4 1.9 2.0

ACCIDENT REPORT FOR THE ENTIRE CITY

LINKS VEHICLE USER PEDESTRIAN

CASUALTIES CASUALTIES

FATAL SERIOUS SLIGHT FATAL SERIOUS SLIGHT

1 1 14 88 1 11 29

2 1 11 68 1 7 17

3 1 12 74 1 5 13

4 1 21 132 1 7 17

5 1 15 96 1 7 17

6 1 12 77 1 6 15

7 1 11 68 1 6 15

8 0 7 45 1 5 13

9 0 2 12 0 2 6

CC 1 0 3 18 0 3 6

CC 2 0 2 14 0 3 7

LOCAL 1 24 147 2 30 91

TOTAL 8 134 839 10 92 246

10

final RUN NO. 1

ACCESSIBILITIES AND PLANNING POLICY

ZONE % ACCESSIBILITY PROPORTION APPLICATIONS APPROVED

CAR USER NON CAR USER HOUSING RETAIL COMMERCIAL


I 68 99 61 55 0.50 0.50 0.00

II 69 99 61 55 0.50 0.50 0.00

III 71 97 52 48 0.50 0.50 0.00

IV 81 97 16 14 0.50 0.50 0.00

V 81 95 9 9 0.50 0.50 0.00

VI 82 91 5 5 0.50 0.50 0.00

VII 83 91 5 5 0.50 0.50 0.30

VIII 85 93 4 5 0.50 0.50 0.50

IX 82 88 3 4 0.40 0.50 0.80

X 79 87 3 3 0.30 0.50 0.90

LAND USE DATA

ZONE HOUSEHOLDS RETAIL FLOOR COMMERCIAL FLOOR

CAR NON CAR SPACE (KSQM) SPACE (KSQM)

OWNERS QWNERS NEW TOTAL NEW TOTAL NEW

I 1698 1149 38 34 -1 351 -11

II 4252 1689 70 15 0 210 -6

III 6781 2913 101 9 0 112 -3

IV 9685 3720 152 9 0 58 -2

V 13005 3707 202 10 0 59 -2

VI 13872 2852 296 10 0 60 -2

VII 15942 2539 371 11 1 63 3

VIII 16939 1479 472 12 1 85 6

IX 13862 1310 474 12 1 75 12

X 14481 673 387 13 1 72 14

TOTAL 110516 22030 2563 134 3 1144 9

11

final RUN NO. 1

PROJECT REPORTS

MAJOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS(K$)

PROJ DESCRIPTION INVESTMENT REQUIRED MAX STATUS

NO SO FAR INVESTMENT INVEST/YR

1 LINK 1 3000 PCU 2000 18000 10000 SHELVED

2 LINK 2 2800 PCU 0 15000 7500

3 LINK 3 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

4 LINK 4 2400 PCU 5000 5000 10000 SHELVED

5 LINK 4 3200 PCU 0 16000 8000

6 LINK 5 3000 PCU 0 8000 4000

7 LINK 6 3000 PCU 0 2000 1000

8 RR1 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

9 RR2 3000 PCU 0 12000 6000

10 RR1 INTERCHANGES 3000 PCU 0 22000 11000

11 PARKING ZONE 1 +1000 LS 0 3000 3000

12 PARKING ZONE 2 +1000 LS 0 2000 2000

13 PARKING ZONE 3 +1000 LS 0 1200 1200

14 PARKING ZONE 4 +1000 LS 0 1000 1000

final RUN NO. 1

CAPITAL ACCOUNT (K$)

INHERITED BALANCE 8558

INTEREST ON DEPOSITS, (RATE = 4%) 342

CENTRAL GOVT GRANT 5199

TOTAL INCOME 5541

EXPENDITURE ON ENGINEERING PROJECTS -200

ROAD MAINTENANCE -3900

BUS LANE CAPITAL -90

CAR PARK CAPITAL WORKS -250

PARK AND RIDE CAPITAL WORKS 0

TRAFFIC RESTRAINT CAPITAL WORKS 0

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CAPITAL WORKS 0

SAFETY AND TRAFFIC CALMING CAPITAL WORKS 0

TOTAL OUTGOINGS -4440

NET TRANSFER 7450

12

BALANCE 17109

CURRENT ACCOUNT (K$)



LOCAL TAXATION, (RATE = 20$/HEAD/YR) 5199

COMMERCIAL TAXATION, (RATE = 420$/PROPERTY/YR) 531

PARKING REVENUE 4212

ROAD USER FEES 0

PARK AND RIDE REVENUE 0

GOVERNMENT TAX ON ROAD PRICING REVENUE 0

TOTAL INCOME 10457

ADMINISTRATIVE AND STAFF COSTS -5000

SUBSIDY TO BUS COMPANY 0

CAR PARK OPERATION COSTS -1730

PARK AND RIDE OPERATIONS 0

TRAFFIC RESTRAINT OPERATION 0

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OPERATION COSTS 0

SAFETY CAMPAIGNS 0

BUS LANE OPERATION COSTS -15


NET TRANSFER -7450

BALANCE 9138

final RUN NO. 1

RESOURCE COSTS (M$)

THIS PREVIOUS INTEREST TOTAL

YEAR YEARS ON PREV

YEARS

TRAVELLER TIME 444 439 18 901

RESOURCE COSTS OF ACCIDENTS 9 9 0 18

COSTS OF CAR OWNERSHIP 88 85 3 177

CAR OPERATING COSTS 53 50 2 105

BUS OPERATING COSTS 10 12 0 22

CAR PARK LAND RENTAL 18 18 1 37

INTEREST ON CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 0 0 0 1

POLICY OPERATION AND ADMIN COSTS 5 5 0 10

TOTAL 627 618 24 1271

CURRENT VALUE OF CAPITAL ASSETS (M$) 102

13

PUBLIC OPINION REPORT

PROTESTS AT LONG STAY PARK CHARGES

COMMERCIAL TAX PAYERS PROTEST

BUS USERS PROTEST NOT ENOUGH BUSES IN THE PEAK

BUS USERS PROTEST NOT ENOUGH OFF PEAK BUSES

PROTEST AT SHORTAGE OF LONG STAY PARK SPACES

PROTESTS OVER PEAK PERIOD CONGESTION

PROTESTS OVER BUSES SLOW SPEED IN PEAK

AT ELECTIONS YOU WOULD GET 41 % OF THE VOTE

INDEX OF BUSINESS CONFIDENCE = 75

Indexes Year 0 Year 1

AGC-car-p 3.23 3.12

AGC-ncp-p 6.37 5.94

cas-fatal 18.00 18.00

confindex 78.00 75.00

env-city 2.30 2.00

mscar-p 0.64 0.63

sp-av-p 12.00 13.00

sp-min-p 5.00 6.00

Vote 35.00 41.00

14

YEAR #2

We starting year 2 investing in buses mobility. So for that, all day lanes were installed in links

1,2,3, 6 and 7. An amount of 3950$ were invested in maintenance. In the bus services we

changed the fares and the frequencies as well to:

Peak buses: 36 buses per hour from 0.27 $+0.08 $/km

Off-peak buses: 16 buses per hour from 0.14$+ 0.04 $/km

We also invested 10 k$ in education aiming to contain the increase of fatalities. To introduce

road pricing calculations were made.

ROAD PRICING CALCULATION

The road pricing used in this simulation was calculated in order to be a consequence of what

the traffic jam costs to the city. The results of such calculation were approximately used in the

politics of road pricing.

In order to determine the expected average speed for the calculations, a mathematical

extrapolation was done using the data of the “peak hour - inbound traffic per section” from the

full output report of Pluto. The simplified model is a linear regression based on the occupation

rate of the roads (PCU/capacity) and the relative speed (real speed/maximum speed).

Then, the SMEED method was applied, using the linear regression for determination of speed,

and data from the “peak period trip characteristics” about the average distances, fees and

generalized cost.

After taking this model in mind we introduced a value of 0.34 $ in Link 4.

Indexes Year 0 Year 1 Year 2

AGC-car-p 3.23 3.12 3.14

AGC-ncp-p 6.37 5.94 5.20

cas-fatal 18.00 18.00 17.00

confindex 78.00 75.00 75.00

env-city 2.30 2.00 2.10

mscar-p 0.64 0.63 0.60

sp-av-p 12.00 13.00 14.00

sp-min-p 5.00 6.00 7.00

vote 35.00 41.00 21.00

15

final RUN NO 2




1 2375 900 2272 36 11 16

2 2185 900 2532 36 9 14

3 2090 900 2821 36 8 12

4 2090 900 3041 36 7 12

5 2375 900 2697 36 12 11

6 2375 900 2461 36 14 11

7 2755 900 2230 36 19 10

8 3000 0 1715 36 24 11

9 2400 0 896 36 28 13

CC 1 2400 1502 8 23 14

CC 2 2600 1646 3 23 14




1 2375 900 540 36 24 7

2 2185 900 173 36 27 10

3 2090 900 201 36 29 14

4 2090 900 496 36 30 17

5 2375 900 496 36 32 18

6 2375 900 624 36 32 19

7 2755 900 835 36 31 20

8 3000 0 759 36 31 28

9 2400 0 378 36 33 31

CC 1 2400 1502 8 23 14

CC 2 2600 1646 3 23 14

final RUN NO. 2



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 1499 659 33226 0.53 0.11

II 3754 968 19446 0.57 0.13

16

III 5986 1669 10449 0.59 0.12

IV 8550 2132 5781 0.62 0.09

V 11481 2124 5873 0.62 0.11

VI 12246 1634 6007 0.65 0.08

VII 14073 1455 6305 0.67 0.06

VIII 14953 847 8330 0.68 0.06

IX 12237 751 7465 0.68 0.05

X 12783 386 7310 0.69 0.04

TOTAL 97564 12626 110190 0.60 0.09



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.70 3.66 3.27 0.81 3.39


(MINS) 16.33 17.39 15.09 16.49


(MINS) 2.42 13.23 13.23 10.08 5.73

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.28 0.56 0.53 0.34

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 3.14 7.26 5.22 2.38 4.17


DAY 66 25 9 10 110


17

final RUN NO. 2




1 2375 900 1462 16 16 16

2 2185 900 1508 16 17 15

3 2090 900 1565 16 17 13

4 2090 900 2027 16 14 13

5 2375 900 1705 16 20 12

6 2375 900 1407 16 23 12

7 2755 900 1122 16 28 12

8 3000 0 896 16 30 14

9 2400 0 466 16 31 15

CC 1 2400 1045 3 27 16

CC 2 2600 487 1 32 19




1 2375 900 396 16 23 8

2 2185 900 143 16 27 11

3 2090 900 124 16 29 15

4 2090 900 546 16 29 17

5 2375 900 441 16 32 18

6 2375 900 375 16 32 19

7 2755 900 364 16 32 20

8 3000 0 386 16 32 29

9 2400 0 197 16 33 31

CC 1 2400 1045 3 27 16

CC 2 2600 487 1 32 19

final RUN NO. 2



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 723 387 15295 0.61 0.10

18

II 1810 569 8062 0.61 0.13

III 2886 981 4412 0.63 0.12

IV 4122 1253 3164 0.64 0.09

V 5535 1248 3360 0.64 0.10

VI 5904 960 3495 0.65 0.07

VII 6785 855 3670 0.66 0.06

VIII 7210 498 4446 0.66 0.06

IX 5900 441 4203 0.66 0.05

X 6163 227 4351 0.67 0.04

TOTAL 47039 7418 54457 0.64 0.09



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.61 3.78 3.41 0.80 3.37


(MINS) 11.78 15.41 13.70 12.70


(MINS) 2.40 15.56 15.56 9.99 6.02

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.01 0.29 0.28 0.09

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 2.22 7.10 5.03 2.36 3.38


DAY 346 98 52 49 544


19

final RUN NO. 2

PARKING REPORT



LONG STAY

I 7000 6000 5753 0.25 **

II 5500 5000 2632 0.10

III 4500 3500 709 0.07

IV 3500 2500 439 0.07

V 2750 2500 429 0.07

VI 3000 2500 1438 0.00

SHORT STAY

I 8000 7000 35580 0.00

II 5000 4500 5630 0.20

III 5000 4500 3180 0.10

IV 3500 2000 5900 0.00

V 2500 2000 7480 0.00

VI 2500 2000 7670 0.00






FIXED FARE PART ($) 0.2700 0.1400 0.2700 0.1400



BUS FLEET 380 138

20

final RUN NO. 2




1 4.1 3.2 3.6 2.9 3.5 2.9 3.1

2 3.9 2.9 3.3 2.6 3.2 2.6 2.8

3 3.9 2.8 3.3 2.4 3.2 2.4 2.7

4 4.0 3.0 3.3 2.6 3.3 2.7 2.9

5 3.9 2.8 3.0 2.2 2.9 2.3 2.6

6 3.6 2.4 2.7 1.9 2.7 1.9 2.2

7 3.5 2.1 2.5 1.5 2.4 1.5 1.9

8 3.4 1.9 2.0 1.2 1.9 1.2 1.6

9 2.7 1.4 1.2 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.1

RR 1 2.7 2.3 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.0 2.1

RR 2 1.8 0.9 1.4 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.0

LOCAL 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3

CITY 2.9 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.3 1.9 2.1





1 1 11 72 1 10 25

2 1 10 64 1 6 16

3 1 12 76 1 5 13

4 1 19 121 1 6 16

5 1 15 94 1 7 17

6 1 13 81 1 6 16

7 1 12 74 1 6 16

8 0 8 50 1 6 14

9 0 2 14 0 3 7

CC 1 0 3 21 0 3 7

CC 2 0 3 18 0 3 8

LOCAL 1 24 147 2 30 92

TOTAL 8 132 832 10 91 247

21

final RUN NO. 2





I 67 99 60 53 0.50 0.50 0.00

II 68 99 59 53 0.50 0.50 0.00

III 72 97 50 46 0.50 0.50 0.00

IV 84 97 16 15 0.50 0.50 0.00

V 81 94 9 10 0.50 0.50 0.00

VI 81 90 5 5 0.50 0.50 0.00

VII 82 89 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.30

VIII 82 91 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.50

IX 80 87 5 5 0.40 0.50 0.80

X 80 86 4 3 0.30 0.50 0.90

LAND USE DATA




I 1807 1081 41 33 -1 340 -11

II 4428 1588 74 15 0 204 -6

III 7064 2735 106 9 0 109 -3

IV 10065 3495 155 9 0 57 -2

V 13434 3483 206 10 0 57 -2

VI 14336 2688 300 11 0 58 -2

VII 16460 2396 376 11 1 66 3

VIII 17495 1400 478 13 1 91 6

IX 14407 1243 479 13 1 87 12

X 14909 637 393 14 1 86 14

TOTAL 114407 20746 2606 138 4 1154 10

22

final RUN NO. 2

PROJECT REPORTS

EXPENDITURE ON TRAFFIC CALMING THE LOCAL NETWORK SO FAR IS 10 K$

ROAD PRICING IS IN OPERATION ,

FEES ($/DAY) FOR LINKS 1 TO 9 AND THE TWO RING ROADS ARE:

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




1 LINK 1 3000 PCU 2000 18000 10000 SHELVED

2 LINK 2 2800 PCU 0 15000 7500

3 LINK 3 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

4 LINK 4 2400 PCU 5000 5000 10000 SHELVED

5 LINK 4 3200 PCU 0 16000 8000

6 LINK 5 3000 PCU 0 8000 4000

7 LINK 6 3000 PCU 0 2000 1000

8 RR1 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

9 RR2 3000 PCU 0 12000 6000


11 PARKING ZONE 1 +1000 LS 0 3000 3000

12 PARKING ZONE 2 +1000 LS 0 2000 2000

13 PARKING ZONE 3 +1000 LS 0 1200 1200

14 PARKING ZONE 4 +1000 LS 0 1000 1000

23

final RUN NO. 2





TOTAL INCOME 5985

EXPENDITURE ON ENGINEERING PROJECTS 0


BUS LANE CAPITAL -120

CAR PARK CAPITAL WORKS 0


TRAFFIC RESTRAINT CAPITAL WORKS -22000


SAFETY AND TRAFFIC CALMING CAPITAL WORKS -10


NET TRANSFER 5992

BALANCE 3006







ROAD USER FEES 5410



TOTAL INCOME 15922


SUBSIDY TO BUS COMPANY -6705



TRAFFIC RESTRAINT OPERATION -200


SAFETY CAMPAIGNS 0



NET TRANSFER -5992

BALANCE 5398

RESOURCE COSTS (M$)

24


YEAR YEARS ON PREV

YEARS









TOTAL 637 1271 50 1960





PROTESTS AT LACK OF SHORT STAY PARK SPACES

PROTESTS OVER PEAK PERIOD CONGESTION

DRIVERS PROTEST ABOUT TRAFFIC RESTRAINT MEASURES



25

YEAR #3

As we can see from the results, the road pricing reduced the congestions in the links and

increased the price to the car trip. We had contained the long stay parks congestion problem

and the cost of the trip to the bus users become significantly lower, that’s probably the reason

that justify that more people are using bus ( as can be seen looking at mscar-p indicator). The

votes were reduced a lot, but as defined before, we know that would happen, the mayor and

the ministers just choose a populist solution. Based on this results, calculations were made to

road pricing, and we decided to introduce in 2 more links to increase the speed of the changes.

So, in the link 2: 0.15$, link 3:0.45 $ and in the link 4:1.00 $ were introduced. Taking on count

the very high number of fatalities in the link four we invested 10 k$ in general education and

more 50K$ specifically on this link.

3900$ were spent in maintenance. The fares of buses were changed to Peak: 0.21$+0.03$/km

and Off-Peak: 0.13$+ 0.02$/km. The frequency was the same of the last year to peak (36) and

one more to off-peak (17)

Indexes Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

AGC-car-p 3.23 3.12 3.14 3.37

AGC-ncp-p 6.37 5.94 5.20 4.89

cas-fatal 18.00 18.00 17.00 18.00

confindex 78.00 75.00 75.00 73.00

env-city 2.30 2.00 2.10 2.10

mscar-p 0.64 0.63 0.60 0.56

sp-av-p 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00

sp-min-p 5.00 6.00 7.00 11.00

vote 35.00 41.00 21.00 13.00

26




1 2375 900 2004 36 13 16

2 2185 900 2036 36 13 14

3 2090 900 2285 36 11 11

4 2090 900 2326 36 12 10

5 2375 900 2257 36 15 9

6 2375 900 2188 36 16 9

7 2755 900 2125 36 19 8

8 3000 0 1641 36 24 9

9 2400 0 859 36 29 10

CC 1 2400 1046 6 28 17

CC 2 2600 2063 2 19 11




1 2375 900 520 36 24 6

2 2185 900 105 36 27 9

3 2090 900 152 36 29 12

4 2090 900 286 36 31 15

5 2375 900 474 36 33 17

6 2375 900 703 36 31 18

7 2755 900 991 36 30 19

8 3000 0 874 36 30 26

9 2400 0 441 36 32 29

CC 1 2400 1046 6 28 17

CC 2 2600 2063 2 19 11

final RUN NO. 3



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 1582 615 32404 0.47 0.11

II 3876 903 18999 0.52 0.14

III 6184 1556 10240 0.54 0.12

IV 8811 1988 5693 0.58 0.09

V 11760 1981 5786 0.59 0.11

VI 12550 1529 5926 0.62 0.08

VII 14409 1363 6689 0.64 0.06

VIII 15316 796 8974 0.65 0.06

27

IX 12613 707 8610 0.65 0.05

X 13052 362 8632 0.66 0.04

TOTAL 100152 11801 111953 0.56 0.09



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.82 3.79 3.41 0.81 3.50


(MINS) 14.81 19.00 16.19 16.15


(MINS) 2.40 13.23 13.23 10.10 6.08

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.73 0.32 0.31 0.52

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 3.37 7.01 4.89 2.38 4.36


DAY 63 30 8 11 112


28

final RUN NO. 3




1 2375 900 1443 17 17 16

2 2185 900 1483 17 17 15

3 2090 900 1538 17 17 13

4 2090 900 2026 17 14 12

5 2375 900 1699 17 20 11

6 2375 900 1400 17 23 11

7 2755 900 1121 17 28 11

8 3000 0 915 17 30 13

9 2400 0 474 17 31 14

CC 1 2400 1089 3 27 16

CC 2 2600 529 1 32 19




1 2375 900 400 17 23 7

2 2185 900 151 17 27 11

3 2090 900 136 17 29 14

4 2090 900 581 17 28 17

5 2375 900 476 17 32 18

6 2375 900 412 17 32 19

7 2755 900 402 17 32 20

8 3000 0 432 17 32 28

9 2400 0 222 17 33 31

CC 1 2400 1089 3 27 16

CC 2 2600 529 1 32 19



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 768 363 14873 0.62 0.10

II 1881 534 7924 0.62 0.13

III 3001 919 4411 0.63 0.11

IV 4276 1174 3211 0.64 0.09

29

V 5707 1171 3411 0.65 0.10

VI 6090 903 3564 0.65 0.07

VII 6993 805 3882 0.66 0.06

VIII 7433 470 4741 0.66 0.05

IX 6121 418 4669 0.66 0.05

X 6334 214 4890 0.66 0.03

TOTAL 48603 6972 55575 0.64 0.09



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.64 3.88 3.51 0.80 3.43


(MINS) 11.77 15.94 14.17 12.86


(MINS) 2.40 15.35 15.35 10.00 5.98

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.01 0.21 0.20 0.06

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 2.22 6.95 4.89 2.36 3.35


DAY 355 104 49 48 556


30

final RUN NO. 3

PARKING REPORT



LONG STAY

I 7000 6000 3886 0.25

II 5500 5000 1448 0.10

III 4500 3500 618 0.07

IV 3500 2500 422 0.07

V 2750 2500 420 0.07

VI 3000 2500 1407 0.00

SHORT STAY

I 8000 7000 34830 0.00

II 5000 4500 5570 0.20

III 5000 4500 3200 0.10

IV 3500 2000 6030 0.00

V 2500 2000 7630 0.00

VI 2500 2000 7850 0.00






FIXED FARE PART ($) 0.2100 0.1300 0.2100 0.1300



BUS FLEET 302 129

31

final RUN NO. 3




1 4.0 3.2 3.4 2.9 3.3 2.9 3.1

2 3.7 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.8

3 3.7 2.8 3.0 2.4 2.9 2.4 2.7

4 3.7 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9

5 3.6 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.5

6 3.5 2.5 2.6 1.9 2.5 1.9 2.2

7 3.5 2.2 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.9

8 3.3 2.0 2.0 1.2 1.9 1.2 1.6

9 2.6 1.5 1.2 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.1

RR 1 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1

RR 2 1.9 1.0 1.7 0.9 2.1 0.9 1.1

LOCAL 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3

CITY 2.9 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.1





1 1 11 73 1 10 24

2 0 9 55 1 6 14

3 1 10 65 1 5 12

4 1 15 97 1 6 14

5 1 14 90 1 6 16

6 1 14 86 1 6 16

7 1 14 89 1 7 17

8 0 10 61 1 6 16

9 0 3 17 0 3 8

CC 1 0 3 16 0 2 6

CC 2 0 5 32 0 4 11

LOCAL 1 29 174 3 35 108

TOTAL 7 137 855 11 96 262

32

final RUN NO. 3





I 80 100 58 51 0.50 0.50 0.00

II 78 100 57 51 0.50 0.50 0.00

III 83 97 48 44 0.50 0.50 0.00

IV 92 95 15 14 0.50 0.50 0.00

V 76 92 9 10 0.50 0.50 0.00

VI 75 89 5 5 0.50 0.50 0.00

VII 77 89 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.30

VIII 80 91 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.50

IX 79 87 4 5 0.40 0.50 0.80

X 75 85 4 4 0.30 0.50 0.90

LAND USE DATA




I 1911 1021 44 32 -1 330 -10

II 4593 1497 75 15 0 198 -6

III 7328 2576 105 9 0 106 -3

IV 10419 3293 152 10 0 55 -2

V 13837 3283 203 10 0 55 -2

VI 14778 2541 295 11 0 56 -2

VII 16957 2268 368 12 1 69 3

VIII 18035 1328 468 13 1 97 6

IX 14937 1183 469 14 1 98 12

X 15327 604 384 15 1 99 13

TOTAL 118122 19594 2562 142 4 1163 10

33

final RUN NO. 3

PROJECT REPORTS

EXPENDITURE ON SAFETY EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS SO FAR IS: 20 K$



0.00 0.15 0.45 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXPENDITURE (K$) SO FAR ON NETWORK SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IS

FOR LINKS 1 TO 9 : 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0

FOR THE TWO RINGROADS AND THE LOCAL NETWORK: 0 0 0




1 LINK 1 3000 PCU 2000 18000 10000 SHELVED

2 LINK 2 2800 PCU 0 15000 7500

3 LINK 3 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

4 LINK 4 2400 PCU 5000 5000 10000 SHELVED

5 LINK 4 3200 PCU 0 16000 8000

6 LINK 5 3000 PCU 0 8000 4000

7 LINK 6 3000 PCU 0 2000 1000

8 RR1 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

9 RR2 3000 PCU 0 12000 6000


11 PARKING ZONE 1 +1000 LS 0 3000 3000

12 PARKING ZONE 2 +1000 LS 0 2000 2000

13 PARKING ZONE 3 +1000 LS 0 1200 1200

14 PARKING ZONE 4 +1000 LS 0 1000 1000

34

final RUN NO. 3





TOTAL INCOME 5526

EXPENDITURE ON ENGINEERING PROJECTS 0


BUS LANE CAPITAL 0

CAR PARK CAPITAL WORKS 0


TRAFFIC RESTRAINT CAPITAL WORKS -4000




NET TRANSFER 12283

BALANCE 12870







ROAD USER FEES 18130



TOTAL INCOME 27397







SAFETY CAMPAIGNS -10



NET TRANSFER -12283

BALANCE 5317

35

final RUN NO. 3

RESOURCE COSTS (M$)


YEAR YEARS ON PREV

YEARS









TOTAL 652 1958 78 2689





PROTESTS AT LACK OF SHORT STAY PARK SPACES

DRIVERS PROTEST ABOUT TRAFFIC RESTRAINT MEASURES



.

36

YEAR #4

The fourth year was the first one that we introduced so-called populist measures. The

domestic and commercial taxes were reduced to its initial fare, 15$ per inhabitant and 400$

per sqm commerce, and the long stay parking fee was reduced by 9%. In this year we also

decided to initiate the only construction in our 5-years project investing 4000 K$ in the Link 5 to

increase its capacity to 3000 pcu/hr. Bus fares were cheapened to fixed fares of 0.19$ in peak

hours and 0.1$ off-peak with a frequency of 35 and 17 buses respectively. We heavily invested

in safety measures as well, 50K$ in Traffic Calming, 20K$ in Education, 10K$ per link and

50K$ specifically on link 4 which is by far the most dangerous. The maintenance expenditure

was of 3950K$.

Indexes Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

AGC-car-p 3.23 3.12 3.14 3.37 3.33

AGC-ncp-p 6.37 5.94 5.20 4.89 4.62

cas-fatal 18.00 18.00 17.00 18.00 18.00

confindex 78.00 75.00 75.00 73.00 76.00

env-city 2.30 2.00 2.10 2.10 2.10

mscar-p 0.64 0.63 0.60 0.56 0.56

sp-av-p 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00

sp-min-p 5.00 6.00 7.00 11.00 11.00

vote 35.00 41.00 21.00 13.00 45.00

37

final RUN NO 4




1 2375 900 1962 35 13 16

2 2185 900 1981 35 13 14

3 2090 900 2197 35 11 12

4 2090 900 2234 35 12 11

5 2137 810 2155 35 14 10

6 2375 900 2083 35 17 9

7 2755 900 2038 35 20 9

8 3000 0 1622 35 24 9

9 2400 0 846 35 29 11

CC 1 2400 1045 8 28 17

CC 2 2600 2108 2 18 11




1 2375 900 521 35 24 6

2 2185 900 111 35 27 9

3 2090 900 165 35 29 13

4 2090 900 312 35 31 16

5 2137 810 509 35 32 17

6 2375 900 751 35 31 18

7 2755 900 1044 35 29 19

8 3000 0 960 35 30 25

38

9 2400 0 489 35 32 29

CC 1 2400 1045 8 28 17

CC 2 2600 2108 2 18 11

4065 8

39

final RUN NO. 4



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 1654 578 31501 0.47 0.11

II 3975 847 18505 0.51 0.13

III 6342 1458 10004 0.54 0.12

IV 9017 1864 5588 0.58 0.09

V 11975 1858 5683 0.58 0.10

VI 12789 1438 5827 0.61 0.07

VII 14675 1284 7040 0.63 0.06

VIII 15608 752 9575 0.64 0.06

IX 12927 670 9700 0.64 0.05

X 13264 342 9895 0.64 0.04

TOTAL 102226 11091 113317 0.56 0.09



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.83 3.87 3.49 0.81 3.54


(MINS) 14.72 18.52 15.84 15.98


(MINS) 2.40 13.26 13.26 10.10 6.20

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.70 0.19 0.19 0.46

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 3.33 6.69 4.62 2.38 4.28


DAY 63 32 8 10 113


40

final RUN NO. 4




1 2375 900 1418 17 17 16

2 2185 900 1451 17 18 15

3 2090 900 1504 17 18 14

4 2090 900 2013 17 14 13

5 2137 810 1682 17 19 12

6 2375 900 1382 17 23 12

7 2755 900 1110 17 28 11

8 3000 0 926 17 29 13

9 2400 0 478 17 31 14

CC 1 2400 1125 3 26 16

CC 2 2600 567 1 31 19




1 2375 900 402 17 23 8

2 2185 900 158 17 27 11

3 2090 900 146 17 29 14

4 2090 900 612 17 28 17

5 2137 810 507 17 31 18

6 2375 900 445 17 32 19

7 2755 900 437 17 32 20

8 3000 0 476 17 32 28

9 2400 0 245 17 32 30

CC 1 2400 1125 3 26 16

CC 2 2600 567 1 31 19

543 8

41

final RUN NO. 4



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 812 342 14484 0.62 0.10

II 1951 502 7801 0.62 0.12

III 3112 864 4416 0.63 0.11

IV 4425 1104 3260 0.64 0.09

V 5876 1101 3465 0.64 0.10

VI 6276 852 3634 0.65 0.07

VII 7201 760 4092 0.65 0.06

VIII 7659 445 5035 0.66 0.05

IX 6343 397 5127 0.66 0.04

X 6509 203 5420 0.66 0.03

TOTAL 50165 6569 56734 0.64 0.08



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.67 3.94 3.57 0.80 3.48


(MINS) 11.81 15.80 14.10 12.88


(MINS) 2.40 15.35 15.35 10.03 6.05

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.04

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 2.23 6.71 4.68 2.36 3.33


DAY 361 113 47 46 567


42

final RUN NO. 4

PARKING REPORT



LONG STAY

I 7000 6000 3578 0.23

II 5500 5000 1208 0.09

III 4500 3500 596 0.06

IV 3500 2500 407 0.06

V 2750 2500 400 0.06

VI 3000 2500 1342 0.00

SHORT STAY

I 8000 7000 33900 0.00

II 5000 4500 5480 0.20

III 5000 4500 3200 0.10

IV 3500 2000 6100 0.00

V 2500 2000 7710 0.00

VI 2500 2000 7970 0.00






FIXED FARE PART ($) 0.2400 0.1300 0.1900 0.1000



BUS FLEET 331 138

43

final RUN NO. 4




1 4.0 3.2 3.4 2.9 3.3 2.9 3.1

2 3.7 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.8

3 3.6 2.8 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.6

4 3.6 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9

5 5.6 4.8 4.2 3.8 2.6 2.3 3.7

6 3.5 2.5 2.6 1.9 2.5 1.9 2.2

7 3.5 2.2 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.9

8 3.3 2.0 2.0 1.3 2.0 1.2 1.7

9 2.6 1.5 1.2 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.1

RR 1 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1

RR 2 2.0 1.0 1.7 0.9 2.1 0.9 1.1

LOCAL 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3

CITY 3.0 2.2 2.3 2.0 2.2 1.9 2.1





1 1 11 72 1 9 23

2 0 8 53 1 5 14

3 0 10 63 1 5 12

4 1 15 95 1 5 14

5 1 14 89 1 6 16

6 1 13 85 1 6 16

7 1 14 89 1 7 18

8 1 10 65 1 7 17

9 0 3 18 0 3 8

CC 1 0 3 17 0 2 6

CC 2 0 5 34 0 4 11

LOCAL 1 28 171 3 35 106

TOTAL 7 134 851 11 94 261

44

final RUN NO. 4





I 82 100 56 50 0.50 0.50 0.00

II 79 100 55 50 0.50 0.50 0.00

III 84 95 47 43 0.50 0.50 0.00

IV 91 94 14 14 0.50 0.50 0.00

V 75 91 9 10 0.50 0.50 0.00

VI 72 88 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.00

VII 76 87 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.30

VIII 78 90 6 6 0.50 0.50 0.50

IX 76 86 5 5 0.40 0.50 0.80

X 74 84 5 4 0.30 0.50 0.90

LAND USE DATA




I 2015 965 48 31 -1 320 -10

II 4758 1413 81 15 0 192 -6

III 7590 2430 115 10 0 103 -3

IV 10768 3106 163 10 0 53 -2

V 14238 3099 216 11 0 53 -2

VI 15226 2405 311 12 1 54 -2

VII 17463 2149 387 12 1 73 3

VIII 18591 1262 490 14 1 103 6

IX 15482 1127 490 14 1 110 12

X 15760 574 403 16 1 113 13

TOTAL 121891 18530 2705 145 4 1174 10

45

final RUN NO. 4

PROJECT REPORTS





0.00 0.15 0.45 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


FOR LINKS 1 TO 9 : 10 10 10 100 10 10 10 10 10





1 LINK 1 3000 PCU 2000 18000 10000 SHELVED

2 LINK 2 2800 PCU 0 15000 7500

3 LINK 3 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

4 LINK 4 2400 PCU 5000 5000 10000 SHELVED

5 LINK 4 3200 PCU 0 16000 8000

6 LINK 5 3000 PCU 4000 4000 4000 ACTIVE

7 LINK 6 3000 PCU 0 2000 1000

8 RR1 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

9 RR2 3000 PCU 0 12000 6000


11 PARKING ZONE 1 +1000 LS 0 3000 3000

12 PARKING ZONE 2 +1000 LS 0 2000 2000

13 PARKING ZONE 3 +1000 LS 0 1200 1200

14 PARKING ZONE 4 +1000 LS 0 1000 1000

46

final RUN NO. 4





TOTAL INCOME 6022



BUS LANE CAPITAL 0







NET TRANSFER 0

BALANCE 10482










TOTAL INCOME 25191










NET TRANSFER 0

BALANCE 6447

47

final RUN NO. 4

RESOURCE COSTS (M$)


YEAR YEARS ON PREV

YEARS









TOTAL 676 2689 108 3472





As seen by the results, our decisons in the fourth year resulted in the increase of votes, as

wanted, the trip cost of non-car users continued to decrease but the results of the car mode

split and car user trip cost were not satisfactory.

YEAR #5

Proceeding with the populist measures we drastically reduced taxations to 5$ per inhabitant

and 150$ per sqm commerce, and a huge investment in safety was made as 100K$ for Traffic

Calming, 150 K$ for Education Campaigns, 350K$ to links 4 and 7, 200K$ for the other links

and 500K$ for local roads were invested. The bus fares on peak and off-peak hours were

reduced to 0.10 $ with a frequency of 36 and 16 respectively. Despite the populism we kept

our road pricing project by raising to 0.2$ the toll in Link 2 and adding a 0.1$ toll on link 5 as

well as finishing the construction at the same link. This way, we got the following results.

48

Indexes Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

AGC-car-p 3.23 3.12 3.14 3.37 3.33 3.33

AGC-ncp-p 6.37 5.94 5.20 4.89 4.62 4.44

cas-fatal 18.00 18.00 17.00 18.00 18.00 17.00

confindex 78.00 75.00 75.00 73.00 76.00 94.00

env-city 2.30 2.00 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10

mscar-p 0.64 0.63 0.60 0.56 0.56 0.56

sp-av-p 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 16.00

sp-min-p 5.00 6.00 7.00 11.00 11.00 12.00

vote 35.00 41.00 21.00 13.00 45.00 51.00

final RUN NO 4




1 2375 900 1962 35 13 16

2 2185 900 1981 35 13 14

3 2090 900 2197 35 11 12

4 2090 900 2234 35 12 11

5 2137 810 2155 35 14 10

6 2375 900 2083 35 17 9

7 2755 900 2038 35 20 9

8 3000 0 1622 35 24 9

9 2400 0 846 35 29 11

49

CC 1 2400 1045 8 28 17

CC 2 2600 2108 2 18 11




1 2375 900 521 35 24 6

2 2185 900 111 35 27 9

3 2090 900 165 35 29 13

4 2090 900 312 35 31 16

5 2137 810 509 35 32 17

6 2375 900 751 35 31 18

7 2755 900 1044 35 29 19

8 3000 0 960 35 30 25

9 2400 0 489 35 32 29

CC 1 2400 1045 8 28 17

CC 2 2600 2108 2 18 11

4065 8

50

final RUN NO. 4



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 1654 578 31501 0.47 0.11

II 3975 847 18505 0.51 0.13

III 6342 1458 10004 0.54 0.12

IV 9017 1864 5588 0.58 0.09

V 11975 1858 5683 0.58 0.10

VI 12789 1438 5827 0.61 0.07

VII 14675 1284 7040 0.63 0.06

VIII 15608 752 9575 0.64 0.06

IX 12927 670 9700 0.64 0.05

X 13264 342 9895 0.64 0.04

TOTAL 102226 11091 113317 0.56 0.09



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.83 3.87 3.49 0.81 3.54


(MINS) 14.72 18.52 15.84 15.98


(MINS) 2.40 13.26 13.26 10.10 6.20

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.70 0.19 0.19 0.46

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 3.33 6.69 4.62 2.38 4.28


DAY 63 32 8 10 113


51

final RUN NO. 4




1 2375 900 1418 17 17 16

2 2185 900 1451 17 18 15

3 2090 900 1504 17 18 14

4 2090 900 2013 17 14 13

5 2137 810 1682 17 19 12

6 2375 900 1382 17 23 12

7 2755 900 1110 17 28 11

8 3000 0 926 17 29 13

9 2400 0 478 17 31 14

CC 1 2400 1125 3 26 16

CC 2 2600 567 1 31 19




1 2375 900 402 17 23 8

2 2185 900 158 17 27 11

3 2090 900 146 17 29 14

4 2090 900 612 17 28 17

5 2137 810 507 17 31 18

6 2375 900 445 17 32 19

7 2755 900 437 17 32 20

8 3000 0 476 17 32 28

9 2400 0 245 17 32 30

CC 1 2400 1125 3 26 16

CC 2 2600 567 1 31 19

543 8

52

final RUN NO. 4



CAR NO CAR CAR WALK

I 812 342 14484 0.62 0.10

II 1951 502 7801 0.62 0.12

III 3112 864 4416 0.63 0.11

IV 4425 1104 3260 0.64 0.09

V 5876 1101 3465 0.64 0.10

VI 6276 852 3634 0.65 0.07

VII 7201 760 4092 0.65 0.06

VIII 7659 445 5035 0.66 0.05

IX 6343 397 5127 0.66 0.04

X 6509 203 5420 0.66 0.03

TOTAL 50165 6569 56734 0.64 0.08



USER

CO NCO

AV DISTANCE / LEG

(KMS) 3.67 3.94 3.57 0.80 3.48


(MINS) 11.81 15.80 14.10 12.88


(MINS) 2.40 15.35 15.35 10.03 6.05

AV FARES & FEES

PAID ($) / LEG 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.04

AV BEHAVIOURAL COST

(GENERALISED $) 2.23 6.71 4.68 2.36 3.33


DAY 361 113 47 46 567


53

final RUN NO. 4

PARKING REPORT



LONG STAY

I 7000 6000 3578 0.23

II 5500 5000 1208 0.09

III 4500 3500 596 0.06

IV 3500 2500 407 0.06

V 2750 2500 400 0.06

VI 3000 2500 1342 0.00

SHORT STAY

I 8000 7000 33900 0.00

II 5000 4500 5480 0.20

III 5000 4500 3200 0.10

IV 3500 2000 6100 0.00

V 2500 2000 7710 0.00

VI 2500 2000 7970 0.00






FIXED FARE PART ($) 0.2400 0.1300 0.1900 0.1000



BUS FLEET 331 138

54

final RUN NO. 4




1 4.0 3.2 3.4 2.9 3.3 2.9 3.1

2 3.7 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.8

3 3.6 2.8 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.6

4 3.6 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9

5 5.6 4.8 4.2 3.8 2.6 2.3 3.7

6 3.5 2.5 2.6 1.9 2.5 1.9 2.2

7 3.5 2.2 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.9

8 3.3 2.0 2.0 1.3 2.0 1.2 1.7

9 2.6 1.5 1.2 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.1

RR 1 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1

RR 2 2.0 1.0 1.7 0.9 2.1 0.9 1.1

LOCAL 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3

CITY 3.0 2.2 2.3 2.0 2.2 1.9 2.1





1 1 11 72 1 9 23

2 0 8 53 1 5 14

3 0 10 63 1 5 12

4 1 15 95 1 5 14

5 1 14 89 1 6 16

6 1 13 85 1 6 16

7 1 14 89 1 7 18

8 1 10 65 1 7 17

9 0 3 18 0 3 8

CC 1 0 3 17 0 2 6

CC 2 0 5 34 0 4 11

LOCAL 1 28 171 3 35 106

TOTAL 7 134 851 11 94 261

55

final RUN NO. 4





I 82 100 56 50 0.50 0.50 0.00

II 79 100 55 50 0.50 0.50 0.00

III 84 95 47 43 0.50 0.50 0.00

IV 91 94 14 14 0.50 0.50 0.00

V 75 91 9 10 0.50 0.50 0.00

VI 72 88 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.00

VII 76 87 5 6 0.50 0.50 0.30

VIII 78 90 6 6 0.50 0.50 0.50

IX 76 86 5 5 0.40 0.50 0.80

X 74 84 5 4 0.30 0.50 0.90

LAND USE DATA




I 2015 965 48 31 -1 320 -10

II 4758 1413 81 15 0 192 -6

III 7590 2430 115 10 0 103 -3

IV 10768 3106 163 10 0 53 -2

V 14238 3099 216 11 0 53 -2

VI 15226 2405 311 12 1 54 -2

VII 17463 2149 387 12 1 73 3

VIII 18591 1262 490 14 1 103 6

IX 15482 1127 490 14 1 110 12

X 15760 574 403 16 1 113 13

TOTAL 121891 18530 2705 145 4 1174 10

56

final RUN NO. 4

PROJECT REPORTS





0.00 0.15 0.45 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


FOR LINKS 1 TO 9 : 10 10 10 100 10 10 10 10 10





1 LINK 1 3000 PCU 2000 18000 10000 SHELVED

2 LINK 2 2800 PCU 0 15000 7500

3 LINK 3 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

4 LINK 4 2400 PCU 5000 5000 10000 SHELVED

5 LINK 4 3200 PCU 0 16000 8000

6 LINK 5 3000 PCU 4000 4000 4000 ACTIVE

7 LINK 6 3000 PCU 0 2000 1000

8 RR1 3000 PCU 0 15000 7500

9 RR2 3000 PCU 0 12000 6000


11 PARKING ZONE 1 +1000 LS 0 3000 3000

12 PARKING ZONE 2 +1000 LS 0 2000 2000

13 PARKING ZONE 3 +1000 LS 0 1200 1200

14 PARKING ZONE 4 +1000 LS 0 1000 1000

57

final RUN NO. 4





TOTAL INCOME 6022



BUS LANE CAPITAL 0







NET TRANSFER 0

BALANCE 10482










TOTAL INCOME 25191










NET TRANSFER 0

BALANCE 6447

58

final RUN NO. 4

RESOURCE COSTS (M$)


YEAR YEARS ON PREV

YEARS









TOTAL 676 2689 108 3472





59

CONCLUSION

Political and financial approaches were used in a mixed way to improve life at Plutopia. Higher

taxes helped gathering money to invest in road pricing, which lead to traffic reduction and

modal split shifting to public transportation. On the political side, the land use shifting directed

development and traffic to outer links, improving environmental indexes and, indirectly, quality

of life. Populist political decisions were important to raise voting rate while big changes

occurred.

Plutopia Project

Documents