8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
1/16
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
2/16
340 L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354
Fig. 1. Pollution of the environment by inorganic and organic compounds.
2. Bioremediation and extra cellular enzymes
Bioremediation, either as a spontaneous or as a managed
strategy, is the application of biological processes for the
clean up of hazardous chemicals present in the environment.
The main bioremediation agents are plants, microor-
ganisms and plant–microorganisms associations. All are
effective agents in the transformation of organic pollutants
because their enzymatic components are powerful cata-
lysts, able to extensively modify structure and toxicological
properties of contaminants or to completely mineralize the
organic molecule into innocuous inorganic end products.
Furthermore, enzymes carry out processes for which no
efficient chemical transformations could have been devised.The degradative efficiency of biological processes, how-
ever, depends on the biodegradability of the contaminants.
It indicates the susceptibility of the contaminant to be de-
graded into less toxic products, and is strongly influenced by
the chemical structure, concentration and properties of the
contaminant, and by environmental conditions. As claimed
by Suthersan “A synthetic chemical that is not a product
of biosynthesis will be degraded only if an enzyme or an
enzyme system is able to catalyze the conversion of this
compound to an intermediate or a substrate able to partici-
pate in existing metabolic pathways” and also “The greater
the difference in structure of the xenobiotic form from the
compounds produced in nature, the less is the likelihood for
significant biodegradation” [2].
The most common contaminants can be classified on
the basis of their biodegradability. Pollutants like simple
hydrocarbons C1–C15, alcohols, phenols, amines, acids, es-
ters, and amides are very easily biodegraded. By contrast,
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hy-
drocarbons (PAHs) as well as pesticides are very difficult
biodegradable. Usually the most complex is the chemical
structure, the less biodegradable is the compound. Theo-
retical predictions of compounds biodegradability can be
usefully obtained by studies of molecular topology, i.e.
studies of the molecular structure of pollutants, occurrence
of branching, and types of atom-to-atom connections. The
molecular connectivity, that can be determined by the struc-
tural formula of the compound, can result of particular
significance in molecular topology studies [1].
In order to be biodegraded, contaminants must interact
with enzymatic systems in the degrading organisms. If sol-uble, they can easily enter cells, if insoluble, they must be
transformed into soluble or easily cell-available products.
The first effective step for cell-transformation of insoluble
substances, including xenobiotics and even plastic materials,
is usually the reaction catalyzed by ecto- and extra cellular
enzymes, which are deliberately released by the cells into
their nearby environment. The process can be quite rapid
for some natural compounds like cellulose or very slow for
many xenobiotics.
Extra cellular enzymes include a large range of oxidore-
ductases and hydrolases. Both these enzymes may explicate
a degradative function and transform polymeric substances
into partially degraded or oxidized products that can be eas-ily up-taken by cells (Fig. 2). These latter in turn provide to
their complete mineralization. For instance, partial oxidation
of recalcitrant pollutants such as PAHs by extra cellular ox-
idative enzymes give rise to products of increased polarity
and water solubility and thus with a higher biodegradability
[4].
Oxidoreductases, however, may also explicate a protective
function by oxidizing toxic soluble products into insoluble,
not yet cell-accessible, products (Fig. 2).
Tabatabai and Fu [5] demonstrated that several oxidore-
ductases and hydrolases were extractable in a free form from
soil, being the two classes of enzymes involved in the trans-formation of both xenobiotic molecules and natural prod-
ucts. Later, Nannipieri et al. [6] reviewed more extensively
the same topic. The authors underlined that enzyme-like
activities rather than purified enzymatic proteins could be
extracted from soil. The majority of these activities were
exhibited by humic–enzyme complexes, showing properties
often dissimilar from those of the free enzymes.
Fig. 2. Roles of extra cellular enzymes in cell metabolism.
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
3/16
L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354 341
2.1. Plant root extra cellular enzymes
Root-associated microorganisms often are assumed to be
the only effectors of the increased xenobiotic biodegrada-
tion occurring in the rhizosphere. An important contribution
can instead derive from the involvement of degradative en-
zymes released by plant roots in their surrounding environ-ment. These enzymes are usually wall-associated enzymes
and provide to partially transform substances in products
more easily up-taken by plant roots or rhizosphere microor-
ganisms.
Gramms et al. [7] followed the exudation of enzymes
by the roots of 12 plant species in non-sterile soils for 56
days. They demonstrated that several members of Fabaceae,
Gramineae and Solanaceae efficiently and considerably re-
leased both oxidases and hydrolases in the root regions of
the soil. Table 1 reports the amounts of peroxidase, laccase,
monophenol monoxygenase, and proteinase–lipase–esterase
activity, expressed as fluorescein diacetate hydrolase, re-
leased by some of the investigated plants. The enzymes were
of plant origin because the results were confirmed in ster-
ile soils. Furthermore, SDS–PAGE and the isolectrofocus-
ing of protein extracts from sterile and non-sterile cultures
of alfalfa and from the unplanted sterile soil confirmed that
the protein preparations from planted soils contained protein
fractions with features characteristic of alfalfa peroxidase
[7].
In another experiment, Chroma et al. [8] showed that, in
vitro, some cultures of plants of various species and mor-
phology transformed polychlorinated biphenyls as well as
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and that their activity was
ascribable to the production of a constitutive cell-wall asso-ciated peroxidase. The presence of PCBs, however, in other
cases was toxic to both the plant and its peroxidase produc-
tion.
Extra cellular plant peroxidases may exhibit different
functions depending on the pH values and the nature of the
electron donors. Recently, Harvey et al. [9] have demon-
strated that cultures of Ipometa batada produced a wide
range of peroxidases with isoelectric points between 3 and
Table 1
Extractable enzyme activities in non-sterile soil–root regions of plants grown for 56 days
Plant species Peroxidase (guaiacol,
mM min−1)
Laccase (ABTS,
M min−1)
Monophenol monoxygenase
(DL-DPOA, M min−1)
FDA hydrolase (fluorescein
diacetate, M min−1)
Control soil 0 0.14 0.48 0.034
Fabaceae
Alfaalfa 1984.7 48.6 33.1 0.30
Soybean 11.1 0.033 0.80 0
Gramineae
Grass mixture 443.3 196.3 79.3 4.34
Maize 2.6 0.074 0.61 0.004
Solanaceae
Tobacco 15.4 0.14 0.67 0.046
Tomato 0 0017 0 0
As modified from [7].
9. The enzymes were able to transform several hydroxy
benzoic acids, and the enzyme activity depended on the
pH and the nature of the electron donors. At pH 7.0, the
salicylhydroxamic acid was oxidized in its quinonic form,
whereas at pH 3.0 and in the presence of a secondary sub-
strate, such as NADH, it served as redox mediator, and
allowed the peroxidase-dependent oxidation of NADH.
2.2. Microbial extra cellular enzymes
2.2.1. Microbial oxidoreductases
In vivo microbial oxidoreductases are periplasmic en-
zymes associated with the cell surface of viable cells.
Their main sources are fungi such as wood-degrading ba-
sidiomycetes, terricolous basidiomycetes, ectomycorrizal
fungi, soil-borne microfungi, and actinomycetes.
A great interest is growing for the use of fungi as biore-
mediating agents [10–13]. Most fungi are robust organisms
and may tolerate higher concentrations of pollutants than
bacteria. In particular, white-rot fungi appear unique and at-
tractive organisms for the bioremediation of polluted sites
for several reasons [10,14]. They can be summarized as fol-
lows:
(1) White-rot fungi are ubiquitous organisms in natural
environments.
(2) White-rot fungi are unique among eukaryotic or
prokaryotic microorganisms, because they posses
a very powerful extra cellular oxidative enzymatic
system: the lignin-degrading enzyme system (LDS),
which has broad substrate specificity and is able to ox-
idize several environmental pollutants [10,13]. Othernon-ligninolytic enzymes, like cellobiose dehydroge-
nases, may participate in the transformation of pol-
luting substances [11,12]. Cellobiose dehydrogenases
are usually secreted under non-ligninolytic condi-
tions when cellulose is the nutrient carbon, and either
directly or indirectly they may oxide several contami-
nants [11,12]. As a consequence, a vast range of toxic
environmental pollutants, including low soluble com-
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
4/16
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
5/16
L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354 343
thalene), that were not substrates of LiP action, suggested
that other enzymes (i.e. monoxygenases) could be involved
in the transformation of PAHs by the fungus [33].
2.2.2. Microbial hydrolases
The other microbial enzymes involved in the pollutant
transformation are hydrolases. Several bacteria and fungiproduce a group of extra or ecto cellular enzymes that in-
clude proteases, carbohydratases (e.g. cellulases, amylases,
xylanases, etc.), esterases, phosphatases and phytases. These
enzymes are physiologically necessary to living organisms.
Some of them (e.g. proteases and carbohydratases) catalyze
the hydrolysis of large molecules, such as proteins and car-
bohydrates, to smaller molecules for subsequent absorption
by cells. Others, like phosphatases and phytases, contribute
to the nutrition of plants and microbes by hydrolysis of or-
ganic P compounds into inorganic P, the only form of phos-
phorous available to plants and microbial cells.
Due to their intrinsic low substrate specificity, hydrolases
may play a pivotal role in the bioremediation of severalpollutants including insoluble wastes.
A list of microbial hydrolases involved in the transfor-
mation of natural and non-natural insoluble compounds,
their preferential substrates and main sources is reported
in Table 3. Keratinic wastes deriving from animal breed-
ing, processing and handling, as well as used paper prod-
ucts discarded by human population, may contribute largely
to enrich the environment with solid wastes. Singh [36]
showed that the C. keratinophilum fungus, isolated by a
waste site containing organic pollutants, was able to pro-
duce an extra cellular protease with an optimum proteolytic
activity against keratin substrates. As previously demon-strated by Kornillowicz-Kowalska [41], no clear correlation
was, however, observed between the rate of keratin degra-
dation and the enzyme production, thus indicating that other
non-enzymatic factors were involved. The author concluded
that the fungus and its proteolytic activity have a great po-
tential for the in situ bioremediation of keratinous wastes.
Table 3
Biodegradation of natural and non-natural insoluble materials by microbial hydrolases
Material Enzyme Source References
Natural materialsCellulose materials Cellulase Trichoderma resei, Penicillium funiculosum [34]
Chitin Chitinase Actinobacteria [35]
Keratin Keratinase Chysosporium keratinophilum [36]
Kraft pulp Xylanase, -xylosidase Sreptomyces thermoviolaceus [37,38]
Sewage sludge Protease, phosphatase Sulphate reducing bacteria [39]
Starch materials Amylase Bacillus licheniformis [40]
Non-natural materials
Nylon Nylon-degrading enzyme (MnP) Un-named white-rot fungus (+Mn and lactate) [43,44]
Poly(l-lactic acid) Depolymerase, alkaline protease Amycolatopsis, Bacillus sp. [45,46]
Polyacrylate Cellobiose dehydrogenase White-rot fungi [11]
Polyurethane Esterase Curvularia senegalensis (not wrf),
Corynebacterium, Comamonas acidovarans
[47–49]
Polyvinyl alcohol 2-4-Pentanedione esterase, laccase Pseudomonas vesicularis, Pycnoporus cinnabarinus [50,51]
An interesting use of cellulases was reported by van Wyk
[34], who demonstrated that cellulases from Penicillum funi-
colosum and Tricoderma resei transformed paper materials
of different origin (e.g. foolscap, filter, office, and newspa-
per and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)), and contributed
to the treatment of solid municipal wastes. Both cellulases
degraded all paper wastes though with a different efficiency.When the two fungal enzymes were tested in combination,
the susceptibility of the cellulose substrates to their hy-
drolytic degradation depended on the different ratio of the
two cellulases in the mixture (Fig. 3).
In a recent paper, Metcalfe et al. [35] investigated an ex-
tra cellular group of bacterial hydrolases: the chitinases, that
hydrolyze the 1–4 glycosidic bonds of chitin in soil. The
authors reported the first molecular ecological assessment
of chitinase diversity within a terrestrial environment. Their
results confirmed that actinobacteria are important effective
agents in chitin degradation in soil and that amendment ap-
plication such as sludge application may contribute to affect
the presence, the activity and diversity of these chitinases. Inparticular, the authors observed that an increase of enzyme
activity but a decrease of chitinase diversity occurred upon
sludge application.
That a prominent role in the hydrolysis of phytin by fungi
was explicated by an extra cellular phytase was demonstrated
in comparative studies on the relative efficiency of intra and
extra cellular phosphatases and phytases in six fungi [42].
The extra cellular phytases were found 60% more efficient
than their intracellular counterparts; whereas most of the
acid and alkaline phosphatase activity was found inside the
cell.
Pollutants of a great environmental concern are plastics,i.e. synthetic, man-made materials widely used in modern
society for several purposes. Polyurethanes, polyacrylates,
polylactides, nylon, starch polymers, and mixed composites
of different starting materials are widely applied in the med-
ical, automotive and industrial fields. These materials are
highly recalcitrant and when discarded in the environment,
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
6/16
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
7/16
L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354 345
waste treatment were previously reviewed by Nannipieri and
Bollag [55], Karam and Nicell [56] and Nicell [57].
As pointed out by the authors, cell-free enzymes can
offer several advantages over the use of microbial cells.
The most significant features of cell-free enzymes are their
unique substrate-specificity and catalytic power; their capa-
bility to act in the presence of many toxic, even recalcitrant,substances, and/or under a wide range of environmental
conditions, often unfavourable to active microbial cells (i.e.
relatively wide temperature, pH and salinity ranges, high
and low concentrations of contaminants); and their low
sensitivity or susceptibility to the presence of predators,
inhibitors of microbial metabolism, and drastic changes in
contaminant concentrations.
Table 4 illustrates a wide range of cell-free enzymes ap-
plied to the biodegradation of different pollutants.
Pesticides of different chemical nature, very recalcitrant
compounds like asphaltenes and PCBs, polychlorophe-
nols, PAHs and others toxic pollutants were successfully
transformed by oxidoreductases and hydrolases isolated byfungal, bacterial and plant cells. The majority of results
summarized in Table 6, however, have been obtained under
laboratory conditions. As it will be addressed below, several
causes concur to hamper and render difficult the use of iso-
lated enzymes as tools in the detoxifications of polluted sites.
The three- and four-ring polycyclic aromatic hydrocar-
bons anthracene, phenanthrene, pyrene and fluoranthene
were in vitro-oxidized by extra cellular lignin peroxidase,
manganese peroxidase and laccase, prepared from the white
rot fungus Nematoloma frowardii and by mush-room ty-
rosinase (Tyr) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) [58]. LiP
transformed 58.6% of anthracene and 34.2% of pyrene,whereas 31.5% of anthracene and 11.2% of pyrene were ox-
idized by MnP. In the presence of the mediating substances
veratryl alcohol (for LiP), reduced glutathione (GSH) (for
MnP), and ABTS (for L, Tyr, HRP), the transformation of
Table 4
Biodegradation of pollutants by cell-free enzymes
Pollutant Enzymes Source Properties References
Anthracene, pyrene LiP, MnP, laccase Nematoloma forwardii High (veratryl alcohol) [58]
Asphaltenes Chloroperoxidase Cladariomyces fumago High activity in organic solvents [59,60]
Carbofuran, carbaryl Carbamate hydrolase Achromobacter sp.,
Pseudomonas sp.
Cytosolic, high specificity [61,62]
Cyanides Cyanidase, cyanide hydratase Alcaligenes denitrificans, several
fungi
Usually inducible, very stable in
immobilized form
[63–66]
Estrogenic chemicals MnP, laccase Trametes versicolor 70–100% transformation [67]
Nitrile compounds Nitrilase, nitrile hydratase,
amidase
Nocardia sp., Rhodococcus sp.,
Fusarium solani
High stability up to 60 ◦C and
pH 6.0–11.0
[68]
PCP, DDT, PCBs, lindane Dehalogenases, laccase Several microorganisms Sensitivity to SH-agents,
stereospecificity
[54,69]
Phenols, PAH MnP, LiP, laccase,
chloroperoxidases, peroxidase
White-rot fungi Very versatile under different
operational conditions
[57,70–72]
Pyrethroids, parathion,
coumaphos, diazinon
Agrobacterium, Pseudomonas sp.,
Flavobacterium sp., Nocardia sp.,
Bacillus cereus
High stability at 50 ◦C and pH
5.5–10.0
[73–75]
DDT: dichloro diphenyl tricholorethane. For other compounds and enzyme symbols see Table 2.
Table 5
Biodegradation of phenols by cell-free laccase from Cerrena unicolor
Substrate –(OH) Substituent Substrate
decrease (%)
o-Cl-phenol 1 −1Cl 18
p-Cl-phenol 1 −1Cl 20
2,4-DCP 1 −2Cl 66
p-Tyrosol 1 –CH2CH2OH 73
o-Tyrosol 1 –CH2CH2OH 28
m-Tyrosol 1 –CH2CH2OH 11
Catechol 2 – 100
Resorcinol 2 – 40
Methylcatechol 2 –CH3 76
Hydroxytyrosol 2 –CH2CH2OH 86
Pyrogallol 3 – 100
Gallic acid 3 –COOH 98
From [70,71].
PAHs was enhanced in most cases. Furthermore, studies
performed with PAH-derivatives, known as intermediates or
potential dead-end-products of microbial PAHs metabolism,
demonstrated that the hydroxylated PAHs metabolites were
oxidized by all the oxidoreductases, whereas PAH-quinones
and oxo-metabolites were not transformed.
The studies by Bollag and co-workers (for a detailed list
see Table 2 and reported references in [18]) and Gianfreda
and co-workers [70,71,76–78] have demonstrated that lac-
cases from different fungal origins were capable of removing
a large variety of phenols and the efficiency was strictly de-
pendent on the chemical structure of the phenol, the type and
the number of substituents on the aromatic ring (Table 5).
An interesting application of fungal oxidases with es-trogenic chemicals was shown by Tsutsumi et al. [67].
Estrogenic chemicals are man-made chemicals that mimic
the effects of hormones (particularly estrogens). Like nat-
ural estrogens they can bind to the estrogen receptor and
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
8/16
346 L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354
Fig. 4. Bisphenol (BPA) and nonylphenol (NP) disappearance by oxidoreductases from various origins (from [67]).
regulate the activity of estrogen responsive genes. Such
effects have raised concern that prolonged exposure to
environmentally relevant concentrations of these chem-
icals may adversely affect reproduction in wildlife and
humans.
Bisphenol A (2, 2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) propane; BPA)
and nonylphenol (NP) are widely used in a variety of
industrial and residential applications, and are suspected
of having estrogenic (endocrine-disrupting) activity. As
shown in Fig. 4 both BPA and NP disappeared within
1 h-treatment with a MnP, isolated and partially purified
from the strain P. chrysosporium ME-446. A laccase, par-
tially purified from T. versicolor IFO7043, also removed
BPA by 70% and NP by 60%, and the addition of the
mediator 1-hydroxybenzentriazole (HBT) in the reaction
system greatly improved the laccase potential. Analysis by
gel permeation chromatography indicated oligomers as themain products of BPA and NP enzymatic transformation
[67].
The greatest concern for the biodegradation of estrogenic
chemicals is aimed at the removal of their estrogenic ac-
tivity. In vitro screening tests for chemicals with hormonal
activities using yeasts [79] were utilized to evaluate the es-
trogenic activity of BPA or NP after the enzymatic action
[67]. Both Mn peroxidase and laccase removed the estro-
Fig. 5. Decrease of bisphenol (BPA) and nonylphenol (NP) estrogenic activities by oxidoreductases from various origins (from [67]).
genic activities of BPA and NP within 12 h. Similar results
were obtained within 6 h with laccase in the presence of HBT
(Fig. 5). The overall results led the authors to explain the
BPA and NP transformation mechanisms as due to the poly-
merization and partial degradation of the chemicals brought
about by enzymatic oxidation [67].
Another interesting application of cell-free enzymes is
the use of the so-called nitrile-degrading enzymes capable
of degrading nitrile compounds [68]. Nitrile compounds
are widespread in the environment. They comprise some
of plant origins, such as cyanoglycosides, cyanolipids, rici-
nine, phenylacetonitrile, etc. Nitrile compounds are also
extensively used in chemical industries to produce a variety
of polymers and other chemicals. Other different nitrile
compounds are used as feedstock, solvents, extractants,
pharmaceuticals, drug intermediates (chiral synthons), pes-
ticides (dichlobenil, bromoxynil, ioxynil, buctril), or asintermediates in the organic synthesis of a variety of differ-
ent compounds (e.g. amines, amides, amidines, carboxylic
acids, esters, aldehydes, ketones and heterocyclics).Most ni-
triles are however highly toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic
in nature (Pollak et al. [80]). If present in the environment at
high concentrations they may cause severe diseases in hu-
mans. Consequently, efforts have been made to control their
release in the environment, and/or to remove them from it.
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
9/16
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
10/16
348 L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354
Table 6
Effects of co-substrates on bentazon transformation by oxidoreductases
Humic monomers Laccaseb
(pH 4.0)
Peroxidasec
(pH 3.0)
Bentazona 0 6
+Catechol 100 95
+Ferulic acid 9 19
+Guaiacol 10 9
+Protocatechiuc acid 40 65
+Pyrogallol 0 0
+Resorcinol 2 0
+Syringaldeyde 39 49
+Vanillic acid 6 94
+Caffeic acid 59 27
Modified from [86].a One mM for all the compounds.b From Polyporus pinsitus. Incubation with 4 Units ml−1 for 24h at
25 ◦C.c From horseradish. Incubation with 6 Units ml−1 for 24 h at 25 ◦C.
references therein). The nature of polymeric products as wellas the possible mechanisms involved in the process was ad-
dressed. These model system studies were aimed at achiev-
ing a basic understanding of the possible mechanisms for
oxidative coupling reactions occurring in natural soils and
sediments [85].
Increases and/or decreases of the pollutant transformation
measured as both polymerization or mineralization of the
target pollutant were detected. Kim et al. [86] demonstrated
that the transformation of bentazon, a very recalcitrant herbi-
cide, by laccase or peroxidase may be completely annulled,
or greatly enhanced, by the co-presence of a variety of sub-
stances that are precursors of humic materials (Table 6).In our studies we have also demonstrated that for exam-
ple the 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) decrease by laccases
from different origins (i.e. Cerrena unicolor , Trametes vil-
losa) may be differently affected by the co-presence of
one or two other chlorophenols such as 4-chlorophenol or
2,4,6 thriclorophenol (Table 7) [87]. The 2,4-DCP-laccase
mediated decrease can also be affected by the presence of
its parent precursor, 2,4D, another phenol such as catechol,
or simazine, that is usually supplied to soil in combination
with 2,4D (Table 7) [71]. In another study, enhancing or
depressing effects of a laccase from Rhus vernicifera on
catechol transformation were measured in a model system
of four phenols (catechol, methylcatechol, tyrosol and hy-
droxytytrosol) [78]. Binary, ternary, and quaternary aqueous
phenolic mixtures were investigated (Table 7). The model
system simulates a typical wastewater deriving from an
olive oil factory. In Mediterranean countries, large quan-
tities of wastewater with a high content of phenolic sub-
stances are usually produced as characteristic by-products
of olive-oil production. The main constituents are usually
the compounds used in the model system.
Differentiated effects on the enzyme activity were also ob-
served by the presence of a polluting substance non-substrate
of the enzyme. Investigations performed under laboratory
Table 7
Substrate removal and residual enzymatic activity after laccase action
Substrate Substrate
decrease (%)∗Laccase
activity (%)
Single phenols Cerrena unicolor
2,4-DCP 66 34
Tyrosol 11 88
Resorcinol 40 76Methylcatechol 76 24
Hydroxytyrosol 86 18
Pyrogallol 100 89
Gallic acid 98 83
Phenol mixtures Trametes villosa
2,4-DCP 66 34
+4-CP 56 56
+2,4,6-TCP 58 58
+2,4-D 82 20
Cerrena unicolor
+Catechol 77 20
+Simazine 46 30
+4-CP + 2,4,6-TCP 50 35
+2,4-D + Simazine 0 95+Catechol + Simazine 39 60
+2,4-D + Catechol 100 0
Rhus vernicifera
Catechol 58 70
+Methylcatechol (M) 38 11
+Tyrosol (T) 100 66
+Hydroxytyrosol (H) 99 27
+M + T 16 9
+T + H 95 29
+M + H 56 10
+M + T + H 63 11
The substrate decrease values have been normalized by laccase units.
From [70,71,78,87].
conditions with acid phosphatase from sweet potato a typ-
ical, extra or ecto cellular enzyme, and pesticides such as
carbaryl, atrazine, and glyphosate demonstrated that the ac-
tivity of the enzyme was depressed by atrazine and carbaryl
(40 and 34% of activity reduction, respectively), whereas no
effects were measured with glyphosate [88].
A key factor possibly affecting the pollutants transfor-
mation is the availability of the polluting substance to the
detoxifying agent, that is its bioavailability [89]. Bioavail-
ability is affected by both the inherent properties of the
pollutants (i.e. concentration, molecular structure, water or
organic solubility) and the characteristics of the environ-
ment where they occur.
In soil, several properties such as the amount of or-
ganic matter, the thickness of silt and clay beds, the pres-
ence of dissolved organic matter, the soil aggregation and
sub-superficial heterogeneity can all influence the bioavail-
ability of pollutants [90].
Adsorption and/or entrapment of pollutants on/into or-
ganic and inorganic soil colloids and in soil matrix further
complicate the whole system, and can limit the amount of
pollutant available to microbial cells and their extra cel-
lular enzymes. Their limiting effect can be greater toward
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
11/16
L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354 349
isolated enzymes. Aging processes can also lead to a sig-
nificant reduction of pollutants bioavailability, because of
their sequestration from diffusion into sites within sorbing
matrices or entry into nanopores, both not easily accessible
to large molecules as enzymatic proteins [91].
4.2. Enzyme-derived disadvantages
Disadvantages to the in situ application of extra cellular,
cell-associated or cell-free enzymes may also arise from the
enzymes.
Enzymes may lose their activity upon pollutant transfor-
mation. In the experiments on phenols previously shown in
Tables 5 and 7, the residual activity of laccase was measured
after phenol transformation under standard conditions [71].
The results indicated that the enzyme partially, or totally,
lost its catalytic activity (Table 7). The reduction of activ-
ity was quite dependent on the type of phenol, the entity
of its transformation, and the combination of the phenolsin the mixture. Usually, the higher the phenol concentra-
tion, the more pronounced was the loss of laccase activity.
Measurements of residual laccase activities made in experi-
ments performed with increasing concentrations (from 0 to
0.4 mM) of 2,4-DCP ruled out a possible inhibitory effect
on laccase activity by 2,4-DCP. Indeed, activity tests per-
formed on samples filtered with filters that specifically ad-
sorb 2,4-DCP gave activity values similar to those obtained
without sample filtration. The authors explained their results
as due to the a progressive entrapment and/or adsorption of
active enzyme molecules within/on phenol polymeric aggre-
gates as they formed [70]. These processes may represent
the main mechanism of inactivation because they hinder the
interaction between the substrate and the enzyme [92].
In the soil, enzymes are present in complex, three-
dimensional assemblages of mineral and organic particles
that will restrict their mobility and affect their activity
(Fig. 6) [6,93–95]. Enzyme molecules can be adsorbed, im-
mobilized, or entrapped in such matrices giving rise to the
so-called “naturally immobilized enzymes” [94]. Inactiva-
tion or degradation of enzymatic molecules may also take
Fig. 6. Soil bound enzymes.
Fig. 7. Removal of 2,4-DCP by laccase in the presence of clays, clay-humic
complexes, sand and soils. M: Na-montmorillonite; AM: montmorillonite
covered by different amounts of OH aluminum species (AM3 and AM18,
loading 3 and 18 mmol of Al per gram of montmorillonite); HA: a humic
acid.
place. As a consequence, changes in their kinetics, stabil-
ity and mobility will occur [96]. These latter, in turn, will
determine the operating range of enzymes in soil around
microorganisms and enzymes.
Investigations were performed to evaluate the effective-
ness of laccases from different origins towards the 2,4-DCP
removal when in the presence of different soil components
[70,71,76,77,97]. A montmorillonite (M), a montmorillonite
covered by different amounts of OH aluminum species
(AM3 and AM18, loading 3 and 18 mmol of Al per gram
of montmorillonite), a humic acid (HA), a combination of
HA and AM18, sand and soils with different organic mattercontents were utilized. As respect to the control, i.e. the
enzymes alone, soil components differently affected the
2,4-DCP-laccase activity (Fig. 7). Strong depressing effects
were measured in the presence of montmorillonite, AM18and the combination AM18 +HA. When soils were used,
the reduction of laccase activity increased by increasing the
organic matter content of soils [97].
The immobilization of enzymes on soil components
affected the response of the enzyme to the presence of sub-
stances extraneous to the reaction substrates, as well. When
the influence of carbaryl, atrazine, and glyphosate was
tested on acid phosphatase immobilized on organic (tan-
nic acid), inorganic (montmorillonite) and organo-mineral
(Al(OH) x-tannic acid-montmorillonite ) complexes a dif-
ferent behavior as respect to the free enzyme was observed
[88]. Different causes were invoked by the authors to ex-
plain their results. They related to: (i) the “state” of the
enzyme if free or immobilized on soil components, that
makes the whole system homogenous or heterogeneous; (ii)
the nature of interactions occurring between the enzyme and
the immobilizing support; (iii) the conformational changes
achieved by the enzymatic protein upon immobilization;
and (iv) the influence of the microenvironment created by
the support in the surrounding of the protein [88,95].
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
12/16
350 L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354
As regards to isolated enzymes, a drawback that greatly
hampers their practical application is the cost of enzymes
isolation and purification. Given the best producer of the se-
lected enzyme, the production of a purified enzyme requires
long and expensive isolation and purification procedures.
Furthermore, very low amounts of the purified protein
are usually obtained thus rendering the whole process toocostly for practical applications. Alternative inexpensive
technologies, using for instance agricultural wastes as the
carbon source, may be adopted to increase the growth of
the enzyme-producing microorganisms and to significantly
reduce the cost of enzyme production [98]. Even if the
enzymes are available at very low costs, their use in soil
as free proteins may be hindered by their short life in an
inhospitable environment such soil [54,55,94].
An interesting, low-cost alternative to the use of pu-
rified enzymes can be the utilization of plant material
loading enzymatic activities and proved to be effective
in the detoxification of polluting substances. As it is the
case of the results obtained in the investigations performedwith minced horseradish roots [99,100] and olive husk, a
by-product of olive oil production showing phenoloxidase
activity [101,102], used for the successful transformation
of phenolic pollutants.
Improvements in the production of isolated enzymes may
also derive from molecular technologies. Production of an-
imal and plant enzymes could be performed by means of
genetically modified microorganisms or plants [103,104].
The range of sophisticated modern molecular technolo-
gies now available has provided the researcher with an im-
mensely enhanced choice of potential enzyme sources. For
example, an increasing knowledge of several aspects of theenzymology and molecular biology of the powerful extra
cellular oxidative system (LDS) of fungi is now available
[10,13]. The major genes encoding LiPs, MnPs, and laccases
were cloned and sequenced. The regulation of expression
of the key ligninolytic genes were studied, and the X-ray
crystallographic structures of the LiP and MnP isozymes are
now known and available. These advancements should lead
to the successful genetic engineering of white-rot fungi and
their enzyme systems. Most advantageous bioremediation
strategies for treating contaminated sites can thus possibly
be planned and applied.
The engineering of microbes and enzymes may also help
to improve bioremediation, particularly when the applica-
tion on a large-scale of the selected biological catalyst is
hampered by the low rate of pollutant degradation [105].
As claimed by Chen and Mulchandani [106], recent advan-
tages in genetic and molecular techniques have offered new
chances to modify microbes or enzymes to function as “de-
signer biocatalysts” in which certain required qualities from
different organisms are brought together in a single catalyst
to perform specific bioremediation.
An example is that regarding the transformation of
organophosphates by the so-called “live biocatalysts” [106].
Organophosphates, like parathion, paraoxon, diazinon,
coumaphos, and malathion, are among the most toxic pesti-
cides used in agriculture. They are easily degraded by two
bacterial hydrolases, organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH)
and organophosphorus acid anydrase (OPA), giving rise to
less toxic compounds and further degradable by biological
and chemical processes.
Organophosphate hydrolase is an enzyme produced andisolated by several soil microorganisms, including many
Pseudomonas strains. It is very effective in degrading
these compounds but its practical application is hindered
by the high cost of its purification. By contrast, the use
of whole-cells producing the enzyme can be more cost
effective, but their use is restricted by transport barrier of
organophosphates across the cell membrane [107,108].
Parathion and paraoxon were efficiently detoxified with
OPH anchored and displayed on the cell surface of Es-
cherichia coli. The recombinant whole-cells with surface-
expressed OPH were obtained using the same system used
for the expression of -lactamase on E. coli [108]. The sys-
tem is made by the fusion of the N-terminal lipoprotein se-quence (Lpp), the domain of the pore-forming protein OmpA
and the enzyme. The Lpp directs the Lpp–OmpA–OPH fu-
sion to the outer membrane and the OmpA domain is able
to pass through the lipid by-layer and to localize the enzyme
on the cell surface (Fig. 8). These “live biocatalysts” dis-
played about seven times higher activity than E. coli whole-
cells expressing similar amounts of intracellular OPH, thus
demonstrating the higher efficiency of the enzyme when
acting outside the cell. Furthermore, the enzyme showed a
higher stability to both temperature (100% of activity upon
30 day-incubation at 37 ◦C) and organic solvents.
Enzymes immobilized on natural and synthetic supportsof different nature and through different immobilization
mechanisms have been often proposed as efficient catalytic
tools to overcome several disadvantages linked to the use of
free enzymes [54,55]. Immobilized enzymes have usually
a long-term and operational stability, being very stable to-
ward physical, chemical, and biological denaturing agents.
Furthermore, they may be reused and recovered at the end
of the process. While the use of immobilized enzymes
is widely diffused in several applicative fields, including
environmental applications [55–57,109], their large-scale
application in the bioremediation of polluted soils is not
reported, at least to our knowledge.
The potential of enzymes for bioremediation purposes can
greatly increase by the use of microorganisms and their en-
zymes from extreme environments. Enzymes from both ther-
mophilic and psycrophilic microorganisms usually display
some unusual and particular features that may render them
potential, powerful catalysts for the degradation of pollut-
ing chemicals ([110] and references therein, [111]). Ther-
mophiles and psycrophiles have to adapt themselves to live
and survive under extreme environmental conditions [112].
As a consequence, specialized enzymatic proteins, particu-
larly stable to different denaturing agents, and with elevated
catalytic activity, are produced.
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
13/16
L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354 351
Fig. 8. Parathion detoxification by organophosphate hydrolase (OPH) anchored and displayed on the cell surface of E. coli (from [106]). Lpp: lipoprotein;OmpA: pore forming protein.
The molecular, structural, kinetic and genetic properties of
such enzymes have been in most cases elucidated. Cloning
and expression of genomic related information in heterol-
ogous, fast-growing meshophiles, like E. coli, has allowed
an increased, much less cheaper commercial production of
thermophilic enzymes [113–115]. An increasing knowledge
of cold-adapted enzymes properties is now being develop-
ing, as well [110].
Many industrial applications have benefited from the useof these enzymes. More challenges and potential advantages
may also be envisaged for their application in biotechnol-
ogy including bioremediation ([110] and references therein,
[111]).
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, several extra cellular enzymes, either as
cell-associated or cell-free enzymes, may behave as powerful
catalysts in the biodegradation of harmful pollutants. How-
ever, their large-scale application for remediation of polluted
soils is still limited. This may derive from several drawbacks
and disadvantages depending on both the pollutants and the
enzymes. For instance, the simultaneous presence of several
polluting substances in a contaminated site with synergistic,
often negative, effects on the enzyme efficiency, the high
costs associated with the isolation and purification of free
enzymes, the low stability of enzymes to the harsh condi-
tions of soil all concur to restrict the wide use of enzymes as
remediating agents of polluted soils. Although immobilized
enzymes may present a high stability under soil conditions,
they are not widely applied in the remediation of polluted
soils.
However, exploration of extreme environments, exploita-
tion of genome using advanced technologies, and protein
engineering have opened new frontiers for the production
and application of enzymes. As mentioned by Burton [84]
these achievements has lead to the point where rather than
develop a purpose for an enzyme, it is possible to design
and develop an enzyme for a purpose. This fascinating per-
spective has to resolve a still opened question: what should
be the features of an enzyme to be suited for remediation of soils?
Finally, a successful management or remediation of a con-
taminated site should make the site environmentally agree-
able and usable for some acceptable purposes. This means to
adopt appropriate cleanup criteria and determine what con-
stitutes an environmental acceptable endpoint.
Acknowledgments
This research was partly supported by European Commu-
nity, Project INCO-MED Contract no. ICA3-2002-10021.The authors are grateful to Dr. Luigi Pagano for his help
in the preparation of figures and to Dr. Anna Maria Woods
for her technical help in editing the paper in respect to the
English language and style. DiSSPA Contribution no. 0062.
References
[1] Alexander M. Biodegradation and bioremediation. San Diego:
Academic Press; 1999.
[2] Suthersan SS. In situ bioremediation. Remediation engineering:
design concepts. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1999.
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
14/16
352 L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354
[3] Iwamoto T, Nasu M. Current bioremediation practice and
perspective. J Biosci Bioeng 2001;92:1–8.
[4] Meulenberg R, Rijnaarts HHM, Doddema HJ, Field JA.
Partially oxidized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons show an
increased bioavailability and biodegradability. FEMS Microbiol Lett
1997;152:45–9.
[5] Tabatabai MA, Fu M. Extraction of enzymes in soil. In: Stotzky G,
Bollag J-M, editors. Soil biochemistry, vol. 7. New York: MarcelDekker; 1992. p. 197–227.
[6] Nannipieri P, Sequi P, Fusi P. Humus and enzyme activity. In:
Piccolo A, editor. Humic substances in terrestrial ecosystems.
London: Elsevier Science; 1996. p. 3–328.
[7] Gramms G, Voigt KD, Kirsche B. Oxidoreductase enzymes liberated
by plant roots and their effects on soil humic material. Chemosphere
1999;38:1481–94.
[8] Chroma L, Mackova M, Kucerova P, Der Wiesche C, Burkhard
J, Macek T. Enzymes in plant metabolism of PCBs and Ps. Acta
Biotechnol 2002;22:35–41.
[9] Harvey PJ, Xiang M, Palmer JM. Extra cellular enzymes in
the rhizosphere. In: Proceedings of the Inter-Cost Workshop on
Soil—Microbe—Root Interactions: Maximising Phytoremediation/
Bioremediation, Grainau, Germany, 23—25 May 2002.
[10] Reddy CA. The potential for white-rot fungi in the treatment of pollutants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1995;6:320–8.
[11] Cameron MD, Aust SD. Degradation of chemicals by reactive
radicals produced by cellobiose dehydrogenase from Phanerochaete
chrysosporium. Arch Biochem Biophys 1999;367:115–21.
[12] Cameron MD, Timofeevski S, Aust SD. Enzymology of
Phanerochaete chrysosporium with respect to the degradation of
recalcitrant compounds and xenobiotics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
2000;54:751–8.
[13] Pointing SB. Feasibility of bioremediation by white-rot fungi. Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol 2001;57:20–32.
[14] Bumpus JA. White-rot fungi and their potential use in soil
bioremediation processes. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G, editors. Soil
biochemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1993. p. 65—100.
[15] Reddy CA, D’Souza TM. Physiology and molecular biology of
the lignin peroxidases of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. FEMS
Microbiol Rev 1994;13:137–52.
[16] Higuchi T. Biodegradation mechanism of lignin by white-rot
basidiomycetes. Biotechnology 1993;30:1–8.
[17] Wariishi H, Valli K, Gold MH. Maganese(II) oxidation by
manganese peroxidase from the basidiomycete Phanerochaete
chrysosporium. J Biol Chem 1992;267:23688–95.
[18] Gianfreda L, Xu F, Bollag J-M. Laccases: a useful group of
oxidoreductive enzymes. Bioremediat J 1999;3:1–25.
[19] Bourbonnais R, Paice MG, Freiermuth B, Bodie E, Borneman S.
Reactivities of various mediators and laccases with kraft pulp and
lignin model compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63:4627–
32.
[20] Pointing SB, Jones EBG, Vrijmoed LLP. Optimization of laccase
production by Pycnoporus sanguineus in submerged liquid culture.Mycologia 2000;92:139–44.
[21] Pointing SB, Vrijmoed LLP. Decolorization of azo and tri-
phenylmethane dyes by Pycnoporus sanguineus producing laccase
as the sole phenoloxidase. World J Microbiol Biotechnol
2000;16:317–8.
[22] Archibald FS, Paice MG, Jurasek L. Decolorization of kraft
bleachery effluent chromophores by Coriolus (Trametes) versicolor .
Enzyme Microb Technol 1990;12:846–53.
[23] Limura Y, Hartikainen P, Tatsumi K. Dechlorination of
tetrachloroguaiacol by laccase of white-rot basidiomycete Coriolus
versicolor . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1996;45:434–9.
[24] Bumpus JA. Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989;55:
154–8.
[25] Bogan BW, Lamar RT. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading
capabilities of Phanerochaete laevis HHB-1625 and its extra cellular
ligninolytic enzymes. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62:1597–603.[26] Zeddel A, Majcherczyk A, Hutterman A. Degradation of
polychlorinated biphenyls by white-rot fungi Pleurotus ostreatus
and Trametes versicolor in a solid state system. Toxicol Environ
Chem 1993;40:225–66.[27] Novotny C, Vyas BRM, Erbanova P, Kubatova A, Sasek V. Removal
of various PCBs by various white-rot fungi in liquid cultures. Folia
Microbiol 1997;42:136–40.[28] Alleman BC, Loan BE, Gilbertson RL. Degradation of
pentachlorophenol by fixed films of white-rot-fungi in rotating tube
bioreactors. Water Res 1995;29:61–7.[29] Lin JE, Wang HY, Hickey RF. Degradation kinetics of
pentachlorophenol by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biotechnol
Bioeng 1990;35:1125–34.[30] Bumpus JA, Tatarko M. Biodegradation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene by
Phanerochaete chrysosporium: identification of initial degradation
products and the discovery of a TNT-metabolite that inhibits lignin
peroxidase. Curr Microbiol 1994;28:185–90.[31] Donnelly KC, Chen JC, Huebner HJ, Brown KW, Autenrieth
RL, Bonner JS. Utility of four strains of white-rot fungi for the
detoxification of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in liquid culture. Environ
Toxicol Chem 1997;16:1105–10.[32] Scheibner K, Hofrichter M. Conversion of aminonitrotoluenes by
fungal manganese peroxidase. J Basic Microbiol 1998;38:51–9.[33] Sutherland JB, Selby AL, Freeman JP, Evans FE, Cerniglia CE.
Metabolism of phenanthrene by Phanerochaete chrysosporium.
Appl Environ Microbiol 1991;57:3310–6.[34] van Wyk JPH. Saccharification of paper products by cellulase from
Penicillium funiculosum and Trichoderma reesei. Biomass Bioeng
1999;16:239–42.[35] Metcalfe AC, Krsek M, Gooday GW, Prosser JI, Wellington EMH.
Molecular analysis of a bacterial chitinolytic community in an
upland pasture. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:5042–50.[36] Singh CJ. Optimization of an extra cellular protease of
Chrysosporium keratinophilum and its potential in bioremediation
of keratinic wastes. Mycopathologia 2002;156:151–6.
[37] Garg AP, McGarthy AJ, Roberts JC. Biobleaching effect forStreptomyces thermoviolaceus xylanase preparations on birchwood
kraft pulp. Enzyme Microbial Biotechnol 1996;18:261–7.[38] Christov LP, Prior BA. Repeated treatments with Aureobasidium
pullulans hemicellulases and alkali enhance biobleaching of sulphite
pulps. Enzyme Microb Biotechnol 1996;18:244–50.[39] Whiteley CG, Heron P, Pletschke B, Rose PD, Tshivhunge S,
Van Jaarsveld FP, et al. The enzymology of sludge solubilisation
utilising sulphate reducing systems. Properties of proteases and
phosphatases. Enzyme Microbial Technol 2002;31:419–24.[40] Copinet A, Bliard C, Onteniente JP, Couturier Y. Enzymatic
degradation and deacetylation of native and acetylated strach-based
extruded blends. Polym Degrad Stabil 2001;71:203–12.[41] Kornillowicz-Kowalska T. Studies on the decomposition of keratin
wastes by saprotrophic microfungi. I. Criteria for evaluating
keratinolytic activity. Acta Mycol 1997;32:51–79.[42] Tarafdar C, Yadav RS, Niwas R. Relative efficiency of fungal intra-
and extracellular phosphatases and phytase. Plant Nutr Soil Sci
2002;165:17–9.[43] Deguchi T, Kakezawa M, Nishida T. Nylon degradation by lignin-
degrading fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63:329–31.[44] Deguchi T, Kitaoka Y, Kakezawa M, Nishida T. Purification
and characterization of a nylon-degrading enzyme. Appl Environ
Microbiol 1998;64:1366–71.[45] Nakamura K, Tomita T, Abe N, Kamio Y. Purification and
characterization of an extra cellular poly(l-lactic acid) depolymerase
from a soil isolate. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:345–53.[46] Oda Y, Yonetsu A, Utakami T, Tonomura K. Degradation of
polylactide by commercial proteases. J Polym Environ 2000;8:29–
32.
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
15/16
L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354 353
[47] Crabbe JR, Campbell JR, Thompson L, Walz SL, Schultz WW.
Biodegradation of a colloidal ester-based polyurethane by soil fungi.
Int Biodeter Biodegr 1994;33:103–13.
[48] Kay MJ, McCabe RW, Morton LHJ. Chemical and physical changes
occurring in polyester polyurethane during biodegradation. Inter
Biodet Biodegrad 1993;31:209–25.
[49] Nakajima-Kambe T, Shigeno-Akutsu Y, Nomura N, Onuma F,
Nakahara T. Microbial degradation of polyurethane, polyester
polyurethanes and polyether polyurethanes. Appl Microbiol
Biotechnol 1999;51:134–40.
[50] Kawagoshi Y, Fujita M. Purification and properties of the polyvinyl
alcohol-degrading enzyme 24-pentanedione hydrolase obtained from
Pseudomonas vesicularis var. povalolyticus. World J Microbiol
Biotechnol 1998;14:95–100.
[51] Larking DM, Crawford RL, Christie GBY, Lonergan GT. Enhanced
degradation of polyvinyl alcohol by Pycnoporus cinnabarinus
after pretreament with Fenton’s reagent. Appl Environ Microbiol
1999;65:1798–800.
[52] Howard GT. Biodegradation of polyurethane: a review. Int Biodeter
Biodegrad 2002;49:245–52.
[53] Langsford ML, Gilkes NR, Sing S, Moser B, Miller Jr RC, Warren
RAJ, et al. Glycosylation of bacterial cellulases prevents proteolytic
cleavage between functional domains. FEBS Lett 1987;225:163–7.[54] Gianfreda L, Bollag J-M. Isolated enzymes for the transformation
and detoxification of organic pollutants. In: Burns RG, Dick
R, editors. Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and
applications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002. p. 491—538.
[55] Nannipieri P, Bollag J-M. Use of enzymes to detoxify pesticide-
contaminated soils and waters. J Environ Qual 1991;20:510–7.
[56] Karam J, Nicell JA. Potential application of enzymes in waste
treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 1997;69:141–53.
[57] Nicell JA. Environmental applications of enzymes. Interdisci
Environ Rev 2001;3:14–41.
[58] Guenther T, Sack U, Hofrichter M, Laetz M. Oxidation of PAH
and PAH-derivatives by fungal and plant oxidoreductases. J Basic
Microbiol 1998;38:113–22.
[59] Fedorak PM, Semple KM, Vazquez-Duhalt R, Westlake DWS.
Chloroperoxidase-mediated modifications of petroporphyrins andasphaltenes. Enzyme Microb Technol 1993;15:429–37.
[60] Mogollon L, Rodriguez R, Larrota W, Ortiz C, Torres R.
Biocatalytic removal of nickel and vanadium from petroporphyrins
and asphaltenes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1998;70-72:765–77.
[61] Derbyshire MK, Karns JS, Kearney PC, Nelson JO. Purification
and characterization of an N -methylcarbamate pesticide hydrolyzing
enzyme. J Agric Food Chem 1987;35:871–7.
[62] Mulbry WW, Eaton RW. Purification and characterization of the
N -methylcarbamate hydrolase from Pseudomonas strain CRL-OK.
Appl Environ Microbiol 1991;57:3679–82.
[63] Basheer S, Kut OM, Prenosil JE, Bourne JR. Kinetics of enzymatic
degradation of cyanide. Biotechnol Bioeng 1992;41:465–73.
[64] Basheer S, Kut OM, Prenosil JE, Bourne JR. Development
of an enzyme membrane reactor for treatment of cyanide-
containing wastewaters from the food industry. Biotechnol Bioeng1993;39:629–35.
[65] Barclay M, Hart A, Knowles CJ, Meenssen JCL, Tett VA.
Biodegradation of metal cyanides by mixed and pure cultures of
fungi. Enzyme Microb Tehcnol 1998;22:22.
[66] Lynch JM. Resilience of the rhizosphere to anthropogenic
disturbance. Biodegradation 2002;13:21–7.
[67] Tsutsumi Y, Haneda T, Nishida T. Removal of estrogenic activities
of bisphenol A and nonylphenol by oxidative enzymes from lignin-
degrading basidiomycetes. Chemosphere 2001;42:271–6.
[68] Banerjee A, Sharma R, Banerjee UC. The nitrile-degrading
enzymes: current status and future prospects. Appl Microbiol
Biotechnol 2002;60:33–44.
[69] Beaudette LA, Ward OP, Pickard MA, Fedorak PM. Low surfactant
concentration increases fungal mineralization of a polychlorinated
biphenyl congener but has no effect on overall metabolism. Lett
Appl Microbiol 2000;30:155–60.[70] Gianfreda L, Sannino F, Filazzola MT, Leonowicz A. Catalytic
behavior and detoxifying ability of a laccase from the fungal strain
Cerrena unicolor . J Mol Catal B: Enzymatic 1998;14:13–23.[71] Filazzola MT, Sannino F, Rao MA, Gianfreda L. Effect of various
pollutants and soil-like constituents on laccase from Cerrena
unicolor . J Environ Qual 1999;28:1929–38.[72] Bollag J-M, Shuttleworth KL, Anderson DH. Laccase-mediated
detoxification of phenolic compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol
1988;54:3086–91.[73] Coppella SJ, Cruz ND, Payne GF, Pogell BM, Speedie MK, Karns
JS, et al. Genetic engineering approach to toxic waste management
case study for organophosphate waste treatment. Biotechnol Progr
1990;6:76–81.[74] Mulbry WW. Selective deletions involving the organophosphorus
hydrolase gene adpB from Nocardia strain B-1. Microbiol Res
1998;153:213–7.[75] Sutherland T, Russel R, Selleck M. Using enzymes to clean pesticide
residues. Pest Outlook 2002;13:149–51.[76] Filazzola MT, Sannino F, Gianfreda L. The influence of biological
agents on the behaviour of pollutants in soil. Fresinius Environ Bull
1998;7:484–9.
[77] Sannino F, Filazzola MT, Violante A, Gianfreda L. Fate of herbicides as influenced by abiotic and biotic mechanisms.
Chemosphere 1999;39:333–41.[78] Rao MA, Sannino F, Gianfreda L, Bollag J-M. Oxidative
transformation of phenols in aqueous mixtures. Water Res
2003;37:3205–15.[79] Nishikawa J, Saito K, Goto J, Dakeyama F, Matsuo M, Nishihara
T. New screening methods for chemicals with hormonal activities
using interaction of nuclear hormone receptor with coactivator.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1999;154:76–83.[80] Pollak P, Romender G, Hagedorn F, Gelbke H-P. In: Elvers B,
Hawkins S, Schulz G, editors. Ullman’s encyclopedia of industrial
chemistry, vol. A17. 5th ed. Weinheim: Wiley/VCH; 1991. p. 363—
376.[81] Wyatt J, Knowles C. Microbial degradation of acrylonitrile waste
effluents: the degradation of effluents and condensates from themanufacture of acrylonitrile. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 1995;35:227–
48.[82] Battistel E, Bernardi A, Maestri P. Enzymatic decontamination of
aqueous polymer emulsions containing acrylonitrile. Biotechnol Lett
1997;19:131–4.[83] Freyssinet G, Peleissier B, Freyssinet M, Delon R. Crops resistant
to oxynils: from the laboratory to the market. Field Crops Res
1996;45:125–33.[84] Burton SG. Development of bioreactors for application of
biocatalysis in biotransformation and bioremediation. Pure Appl
Chem 2001;73:77–83.[85] Bollag J-M, Dec J. Characterization of the interaction between
xenobiotic residues and humic substances. In: Clapp CE, et al.,
editors. Humic substances and chemical contaminants. Madison,
WI: SSSA; 2001. p. 155—64.[86] Kim J-E, Wang C, Bollag J-M. Interaction of reactive and inert
chemicals in the presence of oxidoreductases: reaction of the
herbicide bentazon and its metabolites with humic monomers.
Biodegradation 1998;8:387–92.[87] Bollag J-M, Chu R, Rao MA, Gianfreda L. Enzymatic
oxidative transformation of chlorophenol mixtures. J Environ Qual
2003;32:62–71.[88] Sannino F, Gianfreda L. Pesticide influence on soil enzymatic
activities. Chemosphere 2001;22:1–9.[89] Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Biores
Technol 2000;74:63–7.[90] Gianfreda L, Nannipieri P. Basic principles, agents and feasibility
of bioremediation of soil polluted by organic compounds. Minerva
Biotecnol 2001;13:5–12.
8/9/2019 Pleurotus s00231
16/16
354 L. Gianfreda, M.A. Rao / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 339–354
[91] Alexander M. Aging, bioavailability and overestimation of risk from
environmental pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 2000;34:4259–65.
[92] Nakamoto S, Machida N. Phenol removal from aqueous solutions by
peroxidase-catalyzed reaction using additives. Water Res 1992;1:49–
54.
[93] Burns RG. Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in
microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 1982;14:423–7.
[94] Gianfreda L, Bollag J-M. Influence of natural and anthropogenic
factors on enzyme activity in soil. In: Stotzky G, Bollag J-M,
editors. Soil Biochemistry, vol. 9. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996.
p. 123—94.
[95] Gianfreda L, Rao MA, Sannino F, Saccomandi F, Violante A.
Enzymes in soil: properties, behaviour and potential applications.
In: Violante A, Huang PM, Bollag J-M, Gianfreda L, editors. Soil
mineral-organic matter-microorganism interactions and ecosystem
health development in soil science, vol. 28B. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
2002. p. 301—28.
[96] Nannipieri P, Gianfreda L. Kinetics of enzyme reactions in
soil environments. In: Huang PM, Senesi N, Buffle J, editors.
Environmental particles: structure and surface reactions of soil
particles. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 449—79.
[97] Gianfreda L, Bollag J-M. Effect of soils on the behaviour of
immobilized enzymes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1994;58:1672–81.[98] van Beilen JB, Li Z. Enzyme technology: an overview. Curr Opin
Biotechnol 2002;13:338–44.
[99] Dec J, Bollag J-M. Use of plant material for the decontamination of
water polluted with phenols. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994;44:1132–9.
[100] Roper JC, Dec J, Bollag J-M. Using minced horseradish roots for
the treatment of polluted waters. J Environ Qual 1996;25:1242–7.
[101] Greco Jr G, Toscano G, Ciuffi M, Gianfreda L, Sannino F.
Dephenolisation of olive mill waste-waters by olive husk. Water
Res 1999;33:3046–50.
[102] Toscano G, Colarieti ML, Greco Jr G. Oxidative polymerisation
of phenols by a phenol oxidase from green olives. Enzyme Microb
Technol 2003;33:47–54.
[103] OECD. Biotechnology for clean industrial products and processes.
Paris, France: OECD; 1998.
[104] Hood EE. From green plants to industrial enzymes. Enzyme Microb
Technol 2002;30:279–83.
[105] Chen W, Brhlmann F, Richins RD, Mulchandani A. Engineering
of improved microbes and enzymes for bioremediation. Curr Opin
Biotechnol 1999;10:137–41.
[106] Chen W, Mulchandani A. The use of live biocatalysts for pesticide
detoxification. Trend Biotechnol 1998;161:71–6.
[107] Hung S-H, Liao JC. Effects of ultraviolet light irradiation
in biotreatment of organophosphates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol
1996;56:37–47.
[108] Richins RD, Kaneva I, Mulchandani A, Chen W. Biodegradation
of organophosphorus pesticides by surface-expressed
organophosphorus hydrolase. Nat Biotechnol 1997;15:984–7.
[109] Durán N, Rosa MA, D’Annibale A, Gianfreda L. Applications
of laccases and tyrosinases (phenoloxidases) immobilized on
different supports: a review. Enzyme Microb Technol 2002;31:907–
31.
[110] Gerday C, Aittaleb M, Bentahir M, Chessa J-P, Claverie P, Collins T,
et al. Cold-adapted enzymes: from fundamentals to biotechnology.
Trends Biotechnol 2000;18:103–7.
[111] Haki GD, Rakshit SK. Developments in industrially importantthermostable enzymes: a review. Biores Technol 2003;89:17–
34.
[112] Rothschild LJ, Mancinelli RL. Life in extreme environments. Nature
2001;409:1092–101.
[113] Hough D, Danson M. Extremozymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol
1999;3:39–46.
[114] Ikeda M, Clark D. Molecular cloning of extremely thermostable
esterase gene from hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus
in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998;57:624–9.
[115] Bruins ME, Janssen AE, Boom RM. Thermozymes and their
applications: a review of recent literature and patents. Appl Biochem
Biotechnol 2001;90:155–86.