1 Port of Rotterdam Minimising dwell times Port Development and Logistics Jakarta October 10th, 2011 By: Capt. Kees. J. Weststrate Sr. Project Manager Port of Rotterdam International 2 Private business Port of Rotterdam Investment responsibility in Rotterdam 3 Top 20 World ports, 2010 Unit: Gross weight x 1 million metric tons - *) Ports combined in 2006 1) Including river trade – 2) Freight tons (= 0,920 metric tons) – 3) Short ton (= 0,907 metric tons) Validity of comparison is limited due to differences in definitions 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 S h an g h a i 1 ) N in g bo &Z h ou s h a n *) Si n ga p o re 2 ) Rott e rdam Ti a njin Guangzhou Qin g dao Dalian Hong K ong 1) Bu s a n 2) Qi nh u a n gd a o S o ut h L o uisia n a H o us to n Sh e nzhen Rizhao Los An gele s Nagoya 2) Port Hedland An twe rp Ch i ba 4 European ports, 2010 Unit: x 1 million tons (m) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 R ot t e rdam ( NL ) A n twerp ( B E) H a m b urg (DE) Marseilles (FR) Amsterdam (NL) Novossiysk ( R U) Le H avre (FR ) Primors k (RU) A l g ecir a s (ES ) B r em en ( D E ) C on st a n t z a( R O ) St. P et er s bu r g ( RU ) Va l e n ci a ( E S) D un kir k( F R ) Ge n oa (IT ) L o ndon (GB) B a rcelona(ES) Ze e brug g e (BE) Wilhe m shaven (DE) Zeeland Seaports (NL) Ghent (BE )
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Port of RotterdamMinimising dwell timesPort Development and LogisticsJakarta October 10th, 2011
By: Capt. Kees. J. WeststrateSr. Project ManagerPort of Rotterdam International
2
Private business
Port of Rotterdam
Investment responsibility in Rotterdam
3
Top 20 World ports, 2010
Unit: Gross weight x 1 million metric tons - *) Ports combined in 2006
1) Including river trade – 2) Freight tons (= 0,920 metric tons) – 3) Short ton (= 0,907 metric tons)
Validity of comparison is limited due to differences in definitions
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Shanghai 1)
Ningbo&
Zhoushan*)
Singapore2)
Rotterdam
Tianjin
Guangzhou
Qingdao
Dalian
Hong
Kong
1)
Busan
2)
Qinhuangdao
SouthLouisian
a
Houston
Shenzhen
Rizhao
LosAngeles
Nagoya
2)
Port Hedland
Antw
erp
Chiba
4
European ports, 2010
Unit: x 1 million tons (m)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Rotterdam(NL)
Antwerp(B
E)
Hamburg
(DE)
Marseilles
(FR)
Amsterdam
(NL)
Novossiysk(RU
)
LeHavre
(FR)
Primorsk
(RU)
Algeciras(ES)
Bremen
(DE)
Constantza(RO
)
St. Petersburg(R
U)
Valencia(ES)
Dunkirk(FR
)
Genoa
(IT)
London(G
B)
Barcelona(ES)
Zeebrugge(BE)
Wilhem
shaven(DE)
ZeelandSeaports
(NL)
Ghent (BE
)
2
5
Segmentsfigures 2010
23.3%
25.4%
26.1%
5.5%
17.7%
Crude oil
Mineral oil products &
Dry bulk
Containers
Breakbulk
other liquid bulk
6
Nautically unsurpassable!
12.500 TEUDraft 15,50 m
8.000 TEUDraft 14,50 m
4.800 TEUDraft 13,50 m
Rotterdam can handle any vesselfully loaden at any time.Now and in the future
Antwerp 12,50 m
Hamburg 12,80 m
Rotterdam > 16 m
Amsterdam 13,70 m
7
Nautical order, safety and security
Traffic management, enforcement of Port Bye-laws,prevention and incident response
8
Nautical accessibility
Directly on the North Sea,with 24/7 unrestrictedaccess
Unparalleled turnaroundtimes
Port Sailing timepilot to berth
Rotterdam Maasvlakte 2 hours
Hamburg 12 hours
Antwerp 12 hours
Key characteristics
3
3
9
po
rto
fro
tterd
am
.co
m
RadioDirectionFinder
Schouwen
Maasvlakte
Wassenaar
index 10
Radar + radio communication (VHF)
index
12
4
13 14
15
State-of-the-art Port Community System
What?
A neutral and reliable information hub for all logisticalinformation in the port
Why?
To align, improve and simplify the exchange of information
Advantages
Simple and efficient information exchange
Optimized logistical processes
Cost reduction
Key characteristics
3
More info at: www.portbase.com16
with Portbasewith Portbasewithout Portbasewithout Portbase